Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
565573
doi:10.1093/intimm/dxr056
Advance Access publication 27 July 2011
Abstract
In neuromyelitis optica (NMO), B-cell autoimmunity to aquaporin-4 (AQP4) has been shown to be
essential. However, the role of T cells remains ambiguous. Here, we first showed an increase in
CD691 activated T cells in PBMCs during NMO relapses. Next, T-cell responses to AQP4 and myelin
peptides were studied in 12 NM0 patients, 10 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and 10 healthy subjects
(HS). Four hours after adding 1 of 28 overlapping AQP4 peptides, a mixture of AQP4 peptides
(AQP4-M) or one of six distinct myelin peptides to 2-day cultured PBMC, CD69 expression on CD41
T cells was examined. Data were analyzed by paired t-test, frequency of samples with 3-fold increase
of CD69 on CD41 cells (fSI3) and mean stimulation index (mSI). The T-cell response to AQP4-M was
significantly increased in NMO (fSI3 5 10/12, mSI 5 5.50), with AQP4 (1130) and AQP4 (91110)
representing the two major epitopes (AQP4 (1130), fSI3 5 11/12, mSI 5 16.0 and AQP4 (91110),
fSI3 5 11/12, mSI 5 13.0). Significant but less extensive responses to these two epitopes were also
observed in MS and HS. Significant reactivities against AQP4 (2140), AQP4 (6180), AQP4 (101120),
AQP4 (171190) and AQP4 (211230) were exclusively found in NMO. In addition, responses to AQP4
(81100) were higher and more frequently detected in NMO, without reaching statistical significance.
Interestingly, among the six myelin peptides studied, proteolipid protein (95116) induced
a significant T-cell response in NMO (fSI3 5 7/12, mSI 5 4.60). Our study suggests that cellular as well
as humoral responses to AQP4 are necessary for NMO development and that the immune response to
myelin protein may contribute to disease pathogenesis.
Keywords: aquaporin-4, CD69, neuromyelitis optica, proteolipid protein, T cell
Introduction
Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) was originally characterized as
a variant of multiple sclerosis (MS) that mainly attacks the
optic nerves and spinal cord. The disease concept of NMO
is now being refined by the discovery of serum autoantibodies to aquaporin-4 (NMO-IgG or anti-AQP4 IgG) that are absent in MS (1, 2). Accumulating evidence has indicated that
NMO-IgG is not merely a biomarker for NMO but acts as
a key player in the pathogenesis of NMO (3, 4). Distribution
of NMO lesions, where Ig is deposited, can be partly
explained by localization of AQP4 (5). Loss of AQP4 and of
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences and Division of Clinical
Research, National Hospital Organization, Nagasaki Kawatana Medical Center, Nagasaki 859-3615, Japan
2
Department of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
3
Department of Neurology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama 350-8550, Japan
4
Institute for Experimental Immunology, Euroimmun, 23560 Lubeck, Germany
5
Institute for Neuroimmunology and Clinical Multiple Sclerosis Research, Center for Molecular Neurobiology Hamburg (ZMNH),
University Medical Center Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
6
Department of Neurology, Kitano Hospital Medical Research Institute, 2-4-20 Ohgimachi, Kita-ku, Osaka 530-848 0, Japan
Solubility
AQP4 (120)
AQP4 (1130)
AQP4 (2140)
AQP4 (3150)
AQP4 (4160)
AQP4 (5170)
AQP4 (6180)
AQP4 (7490)
AQP4 (81100)
AQP4 (91110)
AQP4 (101120)
AQP4 (111130)
AQP4 (121140)
AQP4 (131150)
AQP4 (141160)
AQP4 (151170)
AQP4 (161180)
AQP4 (171190)
AQP4 (181200)
AQP4 (191210)
AQP4 (201220)
AQP4 (211230)
AQP4 (221240)
AQP4 (231250)
AQP4 (241260)
AQP4 (251270)
AQP4 (261280)
AQP4 (271290)
AQP4 (281300)
AQP4 (291310)
AQP4 (301318)
AQP4 (309323)
MOG (1328)
MOG (145160)
PLP (95116)
PLP (139154)
PLP (185209)
MBP (8399)
MSDRPTARRWGKCGPLCTRE
GKCGPLCTRENIMVAFKGVW
NIMVAFKGVWTQAFWKAVTA
TQAFWKAVTAEFLAMLIFVL
EFLAMLIFVLLSLGSTINWG
LSLGSTINWGGTEKPLPVDM
GTEKPLPVDMVLISLCFGLS
SLCFGLSIATMVQCFGH
IATMVQCFGHISGGHINPAV
ISGGHINPAVTVAMVCTRKI
TVAMVCTRKISIAKSVFYIA
SIAKSVFYIAAQCLGAIIGA
AQCLGAIIGAGILYLVTPPS
GILYLVTPPSVVGGLGVTMV
VVGGLGVTMVHGNLTAGHGL
HGNLTAGHGLLVELIITFQL
LVELIITFQLVFTIFASCDS
VFTIFASCDSKRTDVTGSIA
KRTDVTGSIALAIGFSVAIG
LAIGFSVAIGHLFAINYTGA
HLFAINYTGASMNPARSFGP
SMNPARSFGPAVIMGNWENH
AVIMGNWENHWIYWVGPIIG
WIYWVGPIIGAVLAGGLYEY
AVLAGGLYEYVFCPDVEFKR
VFCPDVEFKRRFKEAFSKAA
RFKEAFSKAAQQTKGSYMEV
QQTKGSYMEVEDNRSQVETD
EDNRSQVETDDLILKPGVVH
DLILKPGVVHVIDVDRGEEK
VIDVDRGEEKKGKDQSGE
EKKGKDQSGEVLSSV
RALVGDEVELPCRISP
VFLCLQYRLRGKLRAE
AVRQIFGDYKTTICGKGLSATV
HCLGKWLGHPDKFVGI
SIAFPSKTSASIGSLCADARMYGVL
ENPVVHFFKNIVTPRTP
Soluble
Soluble
Soluble
Soluble
Insoluble
Soluble
Soluble
Soluble
Soluble
Soluble
Soluble
Soluble
Insoluble
Soluble
Soluble
Soluble
Insoluble
Soluble
Soluble
Insoluble
Soluble
Soluble
Soluble
Soluble
Soluble
Soluble
Soluble
Soluble
Soluble
Soluble
Soluble
Soluble
Soluble
Soluble
Soluble
Soluble
Soluble
Soluble
diagnostic criteria for NMO may not be fulfilled (8). This new
strategy has led to the opticospinal type of MS, prevalent in
East Asia, to be identified as NMO disorder spectrum (1, 8).
The underlying molecular mechanisms of NMO remain to
be fully elucidated. While the role of NMO-IgG has been well
recognized, that of T cells in NMO has not yet been established. However, T-cell help is necessary for B cells to mount
an antibody responses against AQP4, a protein antigen.
T cells and antibodies are reported to work together and in
conjunction can induce or enhance the disease process in
some myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-induced
experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) models
(9). Eventually, T cell-induced EAE in addition to Ig at the
induction phase generated lesions similar to NMO in structure
and distribution (4).
In this study, we provide evidence that T cells are activated during NMO relapses and that T-cell reactivity to
AQP4 and to proteolipid protein (PLP) in NMO is increased.
Hence, we propose that T-cell autoimmunity and autoantibodies are important for the development of NMO.
Fig. 1. (a) Frequencies of CD4+CD69+ and CD4 CD69+ T cells were longitudinally monitored in NMO1 from January 1, 2006 to December 4,
2009. Arrows indicated relapses. (b) Frequencies of CD4+CD69+ T cells are shown in remissions and relapses of NMO1-3. (c) Frequencies of
CD69+CD4 T cells are shown in remissions and relapses of NMO1-3. (d) Ratio of CD4+CD69+ cells to CD4 CD69+ cells in the CD3 fraction is
shown.
567
Fig. 2. Frequencies of NMO1 CD69+ cells in CD4+ T cells in response to antigenic stimulation. (a) The indicated antigen was added to freshly
isolated PBMCs. This stimulation non-specifically down-regulated CD69 expression on CD4+ T cells or decreased CD4+CD69+ T cells.
(b) PBMCs were rested for 2 days before the indicated antigen was added.
569
Fig. 3. Frequencies of CD69+ cells in CD4+ T cells in response to AQP4 and PLP (95116). PBMCs were isolated from NMO, MS and HS. The
cells were rested for 2 days. AQP4-M, a single AQP4 peptide or PLP (95116), was added. Four hours later, frequencies of CD4+ CD69+ T cells
were analyzed. Asterisk indicates statistically significant T-cell activation (P < 0.05).
Discussion
Although the role of T cells in NMO has begun to attract the
interest of researchers, the body of knowledge on this matter
remains substantially smaller than that for humoral factors.
Moreover, specific human T-cell epitopes associated with
NMO pathogenesis have yet to be reported.
In this study, we demonstrated that T-cell activation is related to disease activity, as evidenced by up-regulated
CD69 expression in freshly isolated peripheral blood T cells
of NMO patients. One can argue that other factors contribute to T-cell activation. Especially, infection can be a candidate for inducing T-cell activation because infection can
precede NMO relapses. However, apparent infection was
not associated with the relapses analyzed here. Although
only NMO1 had chronic urinary infection, exacerbations of
571
NMO
Mean (SI)
MS
SI > 3 (%)
Mean (SI)
2.60
0.65
2.50
0.96
0.71
0.43
0.54
0.75
1.80
5.30
1.50
0.97
0.38
0.71
0.49
1.10
0.75
0.57
1.00
0.49
0.43
0.55
0.42
0.73
0.52
0.46
0.50
0.45
0.48
0.74
0.72
1.80
0.70
0.74
0.64
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
1.80
0.40
1.50
0.65
0.41
0.21
0.42
0.46
1.80
3.50
0.99
0.61
0.27
0.24
0.28
0.68
0.27
0.37
0.89
0.15
0.24
0.23
0.26
0.77
0.52
0.21
0.34
0.29
0.21
0.51
0.25
1.40
0.56
0.41
0.27
(0.246.10)
(0.001.50)
(0.586.30)
(0.252.10)
(0.291.40)
(0.140.78)
(0.081.30)
(0.251.50)
(0.185.20)
(1.1011.00)
(0.142.70)
(0.252.50)
(0.000.77)
(0.361.10)
(0.000.77)
(0.152.00)
(0.321.10)
(0.141.20)
(0.433.00)
(0.280.66)
(0.140.78)
(0.250.96)
(0.000.77)
(0.002.40)
(0.001.60)
(0.180.71)
(0.081.10)
(0.081.00)
(0.190.83)
(0.071.60)
(0.331.00)
(0.445.40)
(0.002.00)
(0.321.60)
(0.080.93)
4/12
0/11
3/11
0/7
0/7
0/7
0/7
0/7
2/7
8/12
0/7
0/11
0/7
0/7
0/7
0/7
0/7
0/7
0/7
0/7
0/7
0/7
0/7
0/7
0/7
0/7
0/7
0/7
0/7
0/9
0/9
1/12
0/9
0/9
0/9
(33.3)
(0.0)
(27.3)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(28.6)
(66.7)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(8.3)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
1.50
0.53
2.20
1.50
0.97
0.85
0.81
0.93
3.00
6.30
2.10
0.62
0.66
0.81
1.00
2.20
1.40
1.10
0.91
0.79
0.88
0.82
0.53
0.74
0.69
0.64
0.64
0.61
0.58
0.97
0.94
2.30
0.87
0.83
0.81
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
0.64
0.20
0.91
0.92
0.67
0.65
0.39
0.88
3.40
6.60
1.70
0.30
0.47
0.50
0.90
1.60
0.89
0.86
0.60
0.49
0.69
0.40
0.29
0.43
0.35
0.39
0.35
0.24
0.23
0.88
0.68
1.70
0.57
0.70
0.59
SI > 3 (%)
(0.752.60)
(0.190.85)
(0.553.20)
(0.303.50)
(0.302.40)
(0.302.30)
(0.301.20)
(0.143.10)
(0.3410.00)
(0.4817.00)
(0.385.00)
(0.271.30)
(0.301.80)
(0.191.70)
(0.263.30)
(0.474.50)
(0.203.10)
(0.413.10)
(0.302.30)
(0.271.60)
(0.232.30)
(0.221.50)
(0.141.00)
(0.221.40)
(0.301.20)
(0.201.50)
(0.191.40)
(0.251.10)
(0.200.85)
(0.203.40)
(0.292.60)
(0.976.80)
(0.261.90)
(0.162.70)
(0.162.20)
0/10
0/9
2/9
1/9
0/9
0/9
0/9
1/9
3/9
5/9
2/9
0/9
0/9
0/9
1/9
3/9
1/9
1/9
0/9
0/9
0/9
0/9
0/9
0/9
0/9
0/9
0/9
0/9
0/9
1/10
0/10
1/10
0/10
0/10
0/10
(0.0)
(0.0)
(22.2)
(11.1)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(11.1)
(33.3)
(55.6)
(22.2)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(11.1)
(33.3)
(11.1)
(11.1)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(10.0)
(0.0)
(10.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
(0.0)
The frequency of CD69+ cells in CD4+ T cells was determined 4 h after antigenic stimulation after by flow cytometry. SI was calculated in
comparison with non-stimuated CD4+ T cells. Bold values indicate that T cell responses were statistically significant.
and flow cytometry-based technique using peptide-MHC tetramers as reviewed by (13). The results differ greatly
depending on the methodology used. While old tissue
culture-based technique showed about one autoantigenspecific T cell per 106 to 107, earlier reports showed
frequencies >1 per 104 cells. It was described that MHC tetramer-based assays do not work for autoreactive HLA class
II-restricted T cells, probably due to low-affinity TCR recognition of autoantigens that fall below the threshold of assay
sensitivity (13). Our method has been shown to be as easy
and sensitive as any other previous method to detect autoreactive response. Although reactive CD69 expression was
not guaranteed to proceed the steps for cell proliferation or
cytokine production and it remains unkown how 2 days of
culture induced population change, the data obtained in this
study are reasonable and persuading as discussed below.
The potential population change in the unstimulated 2-day
culture tempers our presumption that 13.9% of CD4+ T cells
can be reactivated by AQP4 in vivo during the relapse stage
of NMO1 with largest lesions observed in this study. However, we do believe that the finding that a considerable portion of the activated T cells in the relapse state had the
AQP4-M
5.50 6 3.40 (1.7015.00) 10/12 (83.3)
AQP4 (120)
1.10 6 1.00 (0.003.40)
1/12 (8.3)
AQP4 (1130)
16.00 6 12.00 (1.7040.00) 11/12 (91.7)
AQP4 (2140)
4.80 6 5.20 (0.7520.00)
6/12 (50.0)
AQP4 (3150)
2.10 6 2.60 (0.259.60)
2/12 (16.7)
AQP4 (5170)
1.00 6 0.64 (0.002.50)
0/12 (0.0)
AQP4 (6180)
2.10 6 1.20 (0.655.00)
1/12 (8.3)
AQP4 (7490)
1.10 6 0.78 (0.002.90)
0/12 (0.0)
AQP4 (81100) 14.00 6 28.00 (0.51101.00) 5/12 (41.7)
AQP4 (91110)
13.00 6 9.80 (1.0036.00) 11/12 (91.7)
AQP4 (101120)
6.00 6 7.30 (1.0028.00)
8/12 (66.7)
AQP4 (111130)
1.60 6 1.50 (0.135.40)
2/12 (16.7)
AQP4 (131150)
1.40 6 0.64 (0.352.60)
0/12 (0.0)
AQP4 (141160)
1.20 6 0.89 (0.003.10)
1/12 (8.3)
AQP4 (151170)
1.40 6 0.80 (0.352.60)
0/12 (0.0)
AQP4 (171190)
7.00 6 9.10 (1.0034.00)
7/12 (58.3)
AQP4 (181200)
2.20 6 1.70 (0.335.90)
3/12 (25.0)
AQP4 (201220)
1.60 6 1.50 (0.245.50)
1/12 (8.3)
AQP4 (211230)
2.20 6 1.00 (0.703.80)
3/11 (27.3)
AQP4 (221240)
0.97 6 0.55 (0.242.00)
0/11 (0.0)
AQP4 (231250)
1.20 6 0.59 (0.322.00)
0/11 (0.0)
AQP4 (241260)
1.60 6 0.80 (0.753.30)
1/11 (9.1)
AQP4 (251270)
1.10 6 0.52 (0.462.10)
0/11 (0.0)
AQP4 (261280)
1.40 6 1.20 (0.004.30)
1/11 (9.1)
AQP4 (271290)
1.00 6 0.71 (0.342.60)
0/12 (0.0)
AQP4 (281300)
1.10 6 0.44 (0.252.00)
0/12 (0.0)
AQP4 (291310)
1.40 6 1.40 (0.004.30)
2/12 (16.7)
AQP4 (301318)
1.10 6 0.80 (0.242.60)
0/12 (0.0)
AQP4 (309323)
1.10 6 0.81 (0.002.90)
0/11 (0.0)
MOG (1328)
1.60 6 1.10 (0.373.80)
1/12 (8.3)
MOG (145160)
1.60 6 0.79 (0.753.30)
1/12 (8.3)
PLP (95116)
4.60 6 4.40 (1.1017.00)
7/12 (58.3)
PLP (139154)
1.20 6 0.61 (0.372.70)
0/12 (0.0)
PLP (185209)
1.30 6 1.00 (0.293.80)
1/12 (8.3)
MBP (8399)
1.20 6 0.72 (0.002.40)
0/12 (0.0)
HS
NMO
HLA-DRB1
HLA-DPB1
AQP4 (2140)
AQP4 (91110)
AQP4 (101120)
AQP4 (171190)
0101
0401
0405 or 0410
0802
0803
0901
1302
1401
1405
1406
1501
1502
Unidentified
0201
0202
0401
0402
0501
0901
1401
Unidentified
0/2
1/1
5/8
3/5
3/3
2/3
1/4
0/1
0/1
1/1
7/11
3/6
2/5
6/9
1/2
2/5
0/4
7/13
2/5
1/1
5/10
(0.0%)
(100.0%)
(62.5%)
(60.0%)
(100.0%)
(66.7%)
(25.0%)
(0.0%)
(0.0%)
(100.0%)
(63.6%)
(50.0%)
(40.0%)
(66.7%)
(50.0%)
(40.0%)
(0.0%)
(53.8%)
(40.0%)
(100.0%)
(50.0%)
0/1
0/1
2/7
0/5
1/3
0/2
0/3
0/1
1/1
0/1
4/10
1/6
1/4
4/8
2/2
0/5
0/3
2/10
1/5
0/1
2/9
(0.0%)
(0.0%)
(28.6%)
(0.0%)
(33.3%)
(0.0%)
(0.0%)
(0.0%)
(100.0%)
(0.0%)
(40.0%)
(16.7%)
(25.0%)
(50.0%)
(100.0%)
(0.0%)
(0.0%)
(20.0%)
(20.0%)
(0.0%)
(22.2%)
1/2
1/1
5/8
3/5
3/3
1/3
3/4
1/1
0/1
1/1
8/11
5/6
5/6
6/9
1/2
3/5
2/4
10/13
4/5
1/1
9/11
(50.0%)
(100.0%)
(62.5%)
(60.0%)
(100.0%)
(33.3%)
(75.0%)
(100.0%)
(0.0%)
(100.0%)
(72.7%)
(83.3%)
(83.3%)
(66.7%)
(50.0%)
(60.0%)
(50.0%)
(76.9%)
(80.0%)
(100.0%)
(81.8%)
0/1
1/1
3/7
1/5
3/3
0/2
1/3
0/1
1/1
1/1
4/10
1/6
1/4
4/8
2/2
2/5
0/3
3/10
1/5
1/1
3/9
(0.0%)
(100.0%)
(42.9%)
(20.0%)
(100.0%)
(0.0%)
(33.3%)
(0.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(40.0%)
(50.0%)
(25.0%)
(50.0%)
(100.0%)
(40.0%)
(0.0%)
(30.0%)
(20.0%)
(100.0%)
(33.3%)
0/1
1/1
3/7
1/5
2/3
0/2
0/3
1/1
1/1
1/1
4/10
3/6
0/4
6/8
2/2
2/5
0/3
4/10
2/5
1/1
1/9
(0.0%)
(100.0%)
(42.9%)
(20.0%)
(66.7%)
(0.0%)
(0.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(40.0%)
(50.0%)
(0.0%)
(75.0%)
(100.0%)
(40.0%)
(0.0%)
(40.0%)
(40.0%)
(100.0%)
(11.1%)
0401
0405 or 0410
0802
0803
1302
1406
1501
1502
Unidentified
0201
0202
0401
0501
0901
1401
Unidentified
1/1
2/2
1/1
3/3
1/1
1/1
5/5
2/2
2/3
5/5
1/1
1/1
4/4
1/1
1/1
4/5
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(66.7%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(80.0%)
0/1
2/2
0/1
1/3
0/1
0/1
4/5
1/2
1/3
3/5
1/1
0/1
2/4
1/1
0/1
2/5
(0.0%)
(100.0%)
(0.0%)
(33.3%)
(0.0%)
(0.0%)
(80.0%)
(50.0%)
(33.3%)
(60.0%)
(100.0%)
(0.0%)
(50.0%)
(100.0%)
(0.0%)
(40.0%)
1/1
1/2
1/1
3/3
1/1
1/1
4/5
2/2
3/3
4/5
1/1
1/1
4/4
1/1
1/1
5/5
(100.0%)
(50.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(80.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(80.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
1/1
2/2
1/1
3/3
1/1
1/1
4/5
0/2
1/3
3/5
1/1
1/1
3/4
0/1
1/1
3/5
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(80.0%)
(0.0%)
(33.3%)
(60.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(75.0%)
(0.0%)
(100.0%)
(60.0%)
1/1
2/2
1/1
2/3
0/1
1/1
4/5
1/2
0/3
4/5
1/1
1/1
3/4
1/1
1/1
1/5
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(66.7%)
(0.0%)
(100.0%)
(80.0%)
(50.0%)
(0.0%)
(80.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(75.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(20.0%)
Table 4. Comparison of T-cell epitope between HLA-DR15 carrier and non-carrier and between HLA-DP5 carriers and
non-carrier
HLA
Total
HLA-DRB1
HLA-DPB1
NMO
HLA-DRB1
HLA-DPB1
AQP 4(1130)
AQP4 (2140)
AQP4 (91110)
AQP4 (101120)
AQP4 (171190)
15 carrier
15 negative
Unidentified
05 carrier
05 negative
Unidentified
9/16
5/11
2/5
7/13
4/9
5/10
(56.3%)
(45.5%)
(40.0%)
(53.8%)
(44.4%)
(50.0%)
5/15
1/9
1/4
2/10
3/9
2/9
(33.3%)
(11.1%)
(25.0%)
(20.0%)
(33.3%)
(22.2%)
12/16
7/11
5/6
10/13
5/9
9/11
(75.0%)
(63.6%)
(83.3%)
(76.9%)
(55.6%)
(81.8%)
5/15
4/9
1/4
3/10
4/9
3/9
(33.3%)
(44.4%)
(25.0%)
(30.0%)
(44.4%)
(33.3%)
7/15
3/9
0/4
4/10
5/9
1/9
(46.7%)
(33.3%)
(0.0%)
(40.0%)
(55.6%)
(11.1%)
15 carrier
15 negative
Unidentified
05 carrier
05 negative
Unidentified
6/6
3/3
2/3
4/4
3/3
4/5
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(66.7%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(80.0%)
5/6
0/3
1/3
2/4
2/3
2/5
(83.3%)
(0.0%)
(33.3%)
(50.0%)
(66.7%)
(40.0%)
5/6
3/3
3/3
4/4
2/3
5/5
(83.3%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(100.0%)
(66.7%)
(100.0%)
4/6
3/3
1/3
3/4
2/3
3/5
(66.7%)
(100.0%)
(33.3%)
(75.0%)
(66.7%)
(60.0%)
5/6
2/3
0/3
3/4
3/3
1/5
(83.3%)
(66.7%)
(0.0%)
(75.0%)
(100.0%)
(20.0%)
to AQP4 may be due to past infection with common pathogens, which conferred immunological memory to a part of
AQP4 via molecular mimicry (17), or to other, as yet
unknown mechanisms (13). Although the presence of
AQP4-specific T cells in the natural repertoire may be independent of NMO pathogenesis, another possibility is that
the breakdown of tolerance for AQP4 and subsequent
induction of AQP4-specific T cells is a step in the early
HLA-DPB1
AQP4 (1130)
Funding
Research Grant on Intractable Diseases (Neuroimmunological Diseases) from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare,
Japan.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Etsuko Ogushi for her technical support. The
authors declare no conflicting financial interests.
References
1 Lennon, V. A., Wingerchuk, D. M., Kryzer, T. J. et al. 2004. A serum
autoantibody marker of neuromyelitis optica: distinction from
multiple sclerosis. Lancet 364:2106.
2 Lennon, V. A., Kryzer, T. J., Pittock, S. J., Verkman, A. S. and
Hinson, S. R. 2005. IgG marker of optic-spinal multiple sclerosis
binds to the aquaporin-4 water channel. J. Exp. Med. 202:473.
3 Saadoun, S., Waters, P., Bell, B. A., Vincent, A., Verkman, A. S.
and Papadopoulos, M. C. 2010. Intra-cerebral injection of neuromyelitis optica immunoglobulin G and human complement
produces neuromyelitis optica lesions in mice. Brain 133:349.
4 Bradl, M., Misu, T., Takahashi, T. et al. 2009. Neuromyelitis optica:
pathogenicity of patient immunoglobulin in vivo. Ann. Neurol. 66:630.
5 Pittock, S. J., Weinshenker, B. G., Lucchinetti, C. F., Wingerchuk,
D. M., Corboy, J. R. and Lennon, V. A. 2006. Neuromyelitis optica
brain lesions localized at sites of high aquaporin 4 expression.
Arch. Neurol. 63:964.
6 Misu, T., Fujihara, K., Nakamura, M. et al. 2006. Loss of aquaporin4 in active perivascular lesions in neuromyelitis optica: a case
report. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 209:269.
7 Roemer, S. F., Parisi, J. E., Lennon, V. A. et al. 2007. Patternspecific loss of aquaporin-4 immunoreactivity distinguishes neuromyelitis optica from multiple sclerosis. Brain 130:1194.
8 Wingerchuk, D. M., Lennon, V. A., Lucchinetti, C. F., Pittock, S. J.
and Weinshenker, B. G. 2007. The spectrum of neuromyelitis
optica. Lancet Neurol. 6:805.
9 Krishnamoorthy, G., Lassmann, H., Wekerle, H. and Holz, A. 2006.
Spontaneous opticospinal encephalomyelitis in a doubletransgenic mouse model of autoimmune T cell/B cell cooperation.
J. Clin. Invest. 116:2385.
10 Wingerchuk, D. M., Lennon, V. A., Pittock, S. J., Lucchinetti, C. F.
and Weinshenker, B. G. 2006. Revised diagnostic criteria for
neuromyelitis optica. Neurology 66:1485.
11 Polman, C. H., Reingold, S. C., Edan, G. et al. 2005. Diagnostic
criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the McDonald
Criteria. Ann. Neurol. 58:840.
12 Lu, M., Lee, M. D., Smith, B. L. et al. 1996. The human AQP4 gene:
definition of the locus encoding two water channel polypeptides in
brain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93:10908.
13 Sospedra, M. and Martin, R. 2005. Immunology of multiple
sclerosis. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 23:683.
14 Ohashi, T., Yamamura, T., Inobe, J., Kondo, T., Kunishita, T. and
Tabira, T. 1995. Analysis of proteolipid protein (PLP)-specific
T cells in multiple sclerosis: identification of PLP 95-116 as an
HLA-DR2, w15-associated determinant. Int. Immunol. 7:1771.
15 Illes, Z., Kondo, T., Yokoyama, K., Ohashi, T., Tabira, T. and
Yamamura, T. 1999. Identification of autoimmune T cells among in
vivo expanded CD25+ T cells in multiple sclerosis. J. Immunol.
162:1811.
16 Bieganowska, K. D., Ausubel, L. J., Modabber, Y., Slovik, E.,
Messersmith, W. and Hafler, D. A. 1997. Direct ex vivo analysis of
activated, Fas-sensitive autoreactive T cells in human autoimmune
disease. J. Exp. Med. 185:1585.
17 Benoist, C. and Mathis, D. 2001. Autoimmunity provoked by
infection: how good is the case for T cell epitope mimicry? Nat.
Immunol. 2:797.
18 Nelson, P. A., Khodadoust, M., Prodhomme, T. et al. 2010.
Immunodominant T cell determinats of aquaporin-4, the autoantigen associated with neuromyelitis optica. PLoS One 5:e15050.
19 Kampylafka, E. I., Routsias, J. G., Alexopoulos, H., Dalakas, M. C.,
Moutsopoulos, H. M. and Tzioufas, A. G. 2011. Fine specificities of
antibodies against AQP4: epitope mapping reveals intracellular
epitopes. J. Autoimmun. 36:221
20 Matsuoka, T. S., Suzuki, S. O., Suenaga, T., Iwaki, T. and Kira, J. I.
2011. Reappraisal of aquqporin-4 astrocytopathy in Asian neuromyelitis optoca and multiple sclerosis patients. Brain Pathol. doi:
10.1111/j.1750-3639.2011.00475.x.
573