School of Engineering

http://img.scoop.it/uYvVq2Sxz6Z5movFdDfMDzl72eJkfbmt4t8yenImKBXEejxNn4ZJNZ2ss5Ku7Cxt
(04/09/2014)

Module Title:

Computational Fluid Dynamics.

Module Code:

6ME505

Coursework Assignment No: 1

Assignment Title:

CFD Analysis Concept

Weighting:

60%

Page 1 of 7

School of Engineering
Introduction
Undertaking this assignment will enable you to understand, establish and
apply the principles of Fluid Dynamics in solving engineering problems. It will
also allow application of this knowledge through the use of flow analysis
software to conduct engineering design analysis. Undertaking this assignment
should help you to understand fully the basic principles of Fluid Dynamics in
their applications and their effectiveness in computerised programmes; data
analysis and the interpolation process and interpretation of numerical
information, as well as developing sufficient mathematic and data analysis
skills.

Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of this assignment, the student should be able to:-

1.
2.

Critically evaluate the concepts of fluid mechanics .

Critically evaluation of the principles of CFD (Computational Fluid
Dynamics) to the requirements of the mechanical industry.

The Brief
Part 1 modelling (10% of weighting)
You will be asked to model, research and analyse the wing with Star CMM+
using variation conditions.
The wing could be modelled on the SolidWorks and Imported to Star CMM+
or alternatively it can be drawn direction to the Star CMM+.
The wing sketch would be provided and the student needs to modify
accordingly to meet students own scenario.
Each student will have different scenario and depends on their unique student
ID based on the rules below:
The rules:
If you student ID number is 100123456 therefore:

The last digit will determine the NACA profile camber:

o 1 2 will use NACA 1 series
o 3 4 will use NACA 2 series
o 5 6 will use NACA 3 series
o 7 8 will use NACA 4 series
o 9 0 will use NACA 5 series
The second last digit will determine the maximum chamber position

Page 2 of 7

School of Engineering

o 1 2 will use Max Camber 10%

o 3 4 will use Max Camber 20%
o 5 6 will use Max Camber 25%
o 7 8 will use Max Camber 35%
o 9 0 will use Max Camber 40%
The third last digit will determine the thickness
o 1 2 will use Thickness 10%
o 3 4 will use Thickness 15%
o 5 6 will use Thickness 20%
o 7 8 will use Thickness 25%
o 9 0 will use Thickness 30%
The fourth last digit will determine the angle of attack
o 1 2 will use 1 degree angle of attack
o 3 4 will use 1.5 degree angle of attack
o 5 6 will use 1.75 degree angle of attack
o 7 8 will use 2 degree angle of attack
o 9 0 will use 2.5 degree angle of attack

Your task will be

To conduct a research on the Wing analysis using CFD on journal
paper or other sources (WIKIPEDIA is NOT allowed)
To create the wing profile based on your student ID
To prepare the wing profile based on your scenario
Part 2 CFD setup and analysis (35% weighting)
Your task will be:
To create a setup for the wing using Star CMM+
To run the simulation where the velocity is 90 km/h
You need to consider the following:
The mesh size (geometry preparation)
The physics setup
Boundary condition
Solver settings
Post processing
Is there any better way to improve your setting?
Hint: you really need to consider more scenarios rather than stick to one
solution
Part 3 Result and critical analysis (35% weighting)
Please print and discuss all the results achieved, based on:
a) Geometric displayer

Page 3 of 7

School of Engineering
Scalar displayer
c) Vector displayer
d) Streamline displayer
Hint: Please conduct a critical analysis - do NOT just discuss the images
b)

Part 3 Conclusion (20% weighting)

Flow analysis, using Computational Fluid Dynamics, has been widely used in
many engineering disciplines. Based on your results, discuss the following
points:
a)
b)
c)
d)

The method of simulation construction during the analysis.

Possible mistakes that could be made when conducting simulation.
Conclusion
Recommendations for the system design to achieve the aim and
objectives set

Example for the report layout: (please note this is ONLY an example)
Cover
Content page
Abstract
Introduction
Modelling technique
CFD technique process
Variation / Alternative analysis
Critical Analysis
Conclusion
Recommendation
References
Appendix

Reading Materials
Module lecture and support notes.
Computational fluid dynamics : the basics with applications by Anderson,
John David
Computational fluid dynamics : an introduction for engineers by Abbott, M.
B. (Michael Barry), 1931-; Basco, D. R
Note: These sources are guides only to commonly available material.
Students will also be expected to consult other relevant source
material.

Submission Requirements
Page 4 of 7

School of Engineering
The assignment will need to be approximately 3000 words in length. There
will be 1% penalty for every 50 words over. The assignment will need to be
submitted online including all files including SolidWorks, Star CMM+. Further
Instruction will be given.
The Model and Flow simulation must be designed, conducted and owned by
the student
Submission Date: See front sheet
The assignment report must be handed in to the Online submission on or
before the date of submission.
Submission Details
Specific details for the submission of assignments will be provided with the
assignment brief. There are no automatic right to late submission, with a capped
mark of 40%. However, the University acknowledges that there may be
circumstances which prevent students from meeting deadlines and there are now
three distinct processes in place to deal with differing student circumstances:
1)
Assessed Extended Deadline (AED)
Students with disabilities or long term health issues are entitled to a Support Plan.
The Support Plan will outline any adjustments to assessments which are required to
accommodate an individual students needs. For further details refer to the link
below:
http://www.derby.ac.uk/studentatozHE/support-plans
2)
Exceptional Extenuating Circumstances (EEC)
The EEC policy applies to situations where serious, unforeseen circumstances
prevent the student from completing the assignment on time or to the normal
standard. Students who submit a successful EEC claim will usually be required to
complete a different assessment to that which was originally set. All EEC claims will
be considered by Faculty/UDC panels, which will convene on a monthly basis.
For further details refer to the link below:
http://www.derby.ac.uk/eec
3)
Late Submission up to One Week
Covering unexpected and severe disruption to study, where circumstances do not
require the additional time allowed for by an EEC, the Late Submission process
enables students to complete their existing assessment up to one week late, without
a cap on the grade. Requests for late submission will be made to the relevant
Subject Manager in the School who can authorise an extension of up to a maximum
of one week. The Subject Manager will expect to see compelling evidence that such
an extension is appropriate.
REGULATIONS
This module conforms fully to the UG regulatory framework as outlined in the student
handbook. The grading scale applies to Levels 3, 4, 5 and 6 in the University Credit
Framework. The descriptors are typical characteristics of the standard of work

Page 5 of 7

School of Engineering
associated with each grade, and are given in details by level. Please refer to the 3Rs
document - Section J - for a comprehensive view of this scale.

STUDY ETHICS
You are expected to abide by the rules and regulations of the University in all aspects
of your conduct. Specifically, with regard to assessment, you should consider
Sections J and Q of the Rights, Responsibilities and Regulations document
available on the University web site
HEALTH & SAFETY
The majority of the teaching and learning for this module will be classroom based. A
classroom based Risk Assessment has been has been carried out by the University
identifying significant hazards and risks within this environment. These will be
communicated to you by the lecturer during the first lecture / session.
PLAGIARISM
An academic offence is committed when a student tries to gain improper advantage
for her/himself, or not following the Academic Regulations, concerning any part of the
assessment process. Please refer to the 3Rs statement on:
THE UNDERGRADUATE GRADING SCALE
The grading scale applies to Levels 3, 4, 5 and 6 in the University Credit Framework.
The descriptors are typical characteristics of the standard of work associated with
each grade, and are given in details by level. Please refer to the 3Rs document for a

LECTURE/TUTORIAL /LABORATORIES GUIDANCE

The module will be structured with lecturers and tutorials. You will be expected to
attend all the lectures and those tutorial sessions indicated by the lecturer. The
assessment may require students to perform self directed study/activity and the
lecturer may not necessarily be present at all of these sessions.
Undergraduate Marking Scale: This scale applies to Levels 3, 4, 5 and 6 in the
University Credit Framework. The descriptors are typical characteristics of the
standard of work associated with each range of marks. The descriptors are
illustrative and for guidance only. They are not comprehensive. A mark of 40% is
regarded as a minimum pass.

Page 6 of 7

School of Engineering

Page 7 of 7