Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1
1
In the race for the growth of income, only a few countries have succeeded in
overcoming middle income trap (MIT).
Growth trend in international comparison and middle income trap
Income
Income
Population
Population
30,000
USD
50
million
26,205 50m.
USD
Republic of Korea
Source: IMF(2013), Growth Slowdowns and the Middle-Income Trap
Note: t=0 is defined as the year when the GDP per capita for a particular
country reached 3000 U.S. dollars in PPP terms.
Trade
balance
USD 311 m.
USD 40.16 b.
Export
volume
31m.
363b.
IT
Export
item
Fish,
plywood,
fabrics,
etc.
Automobile
Shipbuilding
Steel
Petrochemical
5th largest
Top
shipbuilder
Global
top-level
5th largest
Top in TV,
Semiconductor
chips,
smartphone
Korea Institute for
Development Strategy
Major obstacles to sustainable growth in Korea were industrial dispute and wage hike.
In that course, Korea had to face the critical point of breaking the gourd, which was
successfully overcome in a rare case.
The rise of income and industrial dispute in Korea
Number of disputes
Current USD
25000.00
4000
3500
GDP per capita
20000.00
3000
Frequency of labor
dispute
2500
15000.00
2000
10000.00
1500
1000
5000.00
500
0.00
In line with the rise in income, human desires change, and at the stage of eyes,
most countries fall behind due to mutual conflict and dispute struggling for more
dividend from one another.
Cause of the MIT: Four stages of human desire
Human Desire
Relative
deprivation
Seek less work,
luxurious life
Work hard
Follow govt
Spiritual
satisfaction
Stage of
brain
Stage of
eyes
Stage of
arms & legs
Stage of
mouth
Income
At the risk of breaking the gourd at the stage of eyes, Korean government launched
bold strategies to ensure sustainable growth.
The policy package for not breaking the gourd at the stage of eyes
II. Upgrade of
labor skills and
techniques for
productivity
increase
I. Diversification
of
competitiveness
sources
IV. Development
of institutions for
sound industrial
relations
Beyond the common knowledge and expectation, President Park Chung Hee ran
the risk of big investment for the future competitiveness sources, which provided a
sound base for sustained economic growth.
I. Diversification of competitiveness sources
Intl criticism:
No economic
feasibility
Global top-level
competitiveness
: the fifth
producer in the
world
All right. If proper education or training is provided, we Koreans can do as the Western
people and Japanese do. -Korean government
II. National drive for training technicians and labor skills for enhancing productivity
Presidential
commitment
Model Technical
High School
Expansion of the
model
Outcome
Renovation of
labor market
Faced with serious labor disputes at the stage of eyes, Korean government realized the
importance of transparency in business management and responsibility of enterprises,
and has taken a series of policy package consecutively.
III. Transparency in business accounting & activities
Institutional
development
Consequences
Under a circumstance of massive unemployment, Korea thought that the best human right
of labor lies in providing employment, rather than in having decent labor institutions in
favor of labor.
ILO Standard
Progression
Consequence
The last six decades of Koreas economic development was the history of struggling and
mediation among unions, employees, and the government with many trials and errors.
IR Laws
Effects
Consequences
US Military Rule
(1945-47)
Wagner Act
Pro-union institution
Syngman Rhee
(1948-60)
Taft-Hartley Act
Struggle against
ideological unions
Post-war economic
recovery
Suspension of labor
activity
Under martial law
Financial Crisis
(1997) and after
Adjustment of laws
Allow 3rd party
engagement
Allow one company multiunions
Indigenous IR system
In accordance with ILO
standard
11
With the philosophy that the best welfare of the labor is employment, Korean government
concentrated its full capacity on founding of industrial development, sacrificing all others, and
standing out to international pressure over IR institution.
Current USD
30,000
3000
20,000
2000
10,000
1000
0
0
1960
IP
IR
LP
BT
1970
Light
industry
Base
industry
1980
HCI drive
1990
2000
OECD membership
Market opening
2010
IMF crisis
Prohibit labor
dispute
Authoritative
regime
Enterprise union
TVET
Kumoh THS
TQS, PES
TAR
NTS
National tasks
Conditions
Population:
253,609,643
Territory:
1,811,569 sq
km
Islands:
13,466
High living
standard for the
people
National
integration
Sustainable &
equitable
growth
13
Ethnics: 360
Defense capacity
Sound base of
manufacturing
industry
Rich resources may cause an easy falling into the middle income trap in Indonesia. However,
the reward of overcoming the trap will be great, not comparable with any other countries.
Market
accessibility
Resource
accessibility
Economic
Growth
Wage
competitive
ness
14
Over-evaluation
High wage cost
Exchange Rate
Labor intensive
industry in a form
of FDI
Stakeholders
Economic Growth
Under a circumstance of massive unemployment, the best welfare and human right of the
labor is employment.
Sound industrial
base
Reduction of
unemployment rate
FDI
P.IV Diversified
competitiveness
sources
P.II Indigenous IR
institutions
Unemployment rate
under target figure
P.III Settlement of
economic
transparency
P.III Economic
transparency
P.II Peaceful IR
15
Renovation of
labor market
16
. Develop indigenous
IR institutions
Development of
indigenous
labor
institutions
17
Tax
administration
reform
. Transparency in business
accounting & activities
. Diversification of
competitiveness sources
other than wage
Peaceful IR
This might be the right time for Indonesian people to make resolution and design a
grand plan for not breaking the gourd, and securing sustainable growth in the long-run.
20
21
The flag of the Asian Games was handed over from Incheon Korea
to Jakarta Indonesia in October 2014.
22
Jordan
Investment Board
Amman, Jordan
UNECA*
Addis Ababa,
Ethiopia
Ministry of Planning,
Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq
Federal Ministry of
Science &Technology
Abuja, Nigeria
Mongolian
Development Institute
Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
Economic Research
Institute
Astana, Kazakhstan
Ministry of Agriculture,
Animal Industry &
Fisheries,
Kampala, Uganda
Ministry of Industry
Quito, Ecuador
KDS HQ
Seoul, Korea
Joaquim Chissano
Foundation
Maputo, Mozambique
ASEAN Foundation*
Jakarta, Indonesia
* Currently under discussion for cooperation
23
Thank you!
Seung-Hun Chun, Ph.D.
sychun@kds.re.kr
24