Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Prepared for:
Mr. S. Bharadhwaj
Instructor of Marketing Research
Great Lakes Institute of Management
Prepared by:
Group A11
FT NUMBER
FT151019
FT151031
FT151018
FT151035
FT151065
FT151083
FT151046
FT151042
NAME
TANMOY BOSE
ANAGHA
ANUJ
ATRAYEE BHATTACHARYA
NAVRAJ
VIDIT
RANJEET MATHEW
MANIKANDAN
Contents
Abstract: .................................................................................................................................................. 3
The Literature Review: ............................................................................................................................ 4
Research methodology: .......................................................................................................................... 5
Qualitative Research: .............................................................................................................................. 5
In-depth Interview .............................................................................................................................. 6
Focus Group Study ............................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
Hypothesis............................................................................................................................................... 7
Quantitative Research: ........................................................................................................................... 7
Data Analysis ............................................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.
Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................. 19
Exhibits .................................................................................................................................................. 19
Abstract:
They are volunteers and partners. Ambassadors, advocates, and donors. Mentors to current students
and lifelong learners. They live in different parts of the globe and work in every field imaginable.
They embody the values, the knowledge, and the passion of the University, and its commitment to
serve the world. They are the Alumni. The alumni plays the role of a former student, an Institutional
Ambassador, Mentor and coach to new incoming students, Community representative, fundraiser and
at many a times Business partner.
Alumni are truly the most important asset to any B-School as the very essence of business starts with
building network into networth and alumni represents an important connecting link in this. The more
older a B-School, the more stronger is its alumni base and all this is possible because of alumni
engagement activities devised by the School. All the efforts in alumni engagement should yield
success stories and in the process increase the spirit of the B-School. The approach to alumni
engagement is to promote a sense of continuing education by facilitating conversations about the
work world, B-School, and work/life balance. The goal is to build an engagement programme such
that the dual role : (i) Value to the institution and (ii) Value to the alumni/alumnus can be achieved.
It is worth noting that not every alum believes that his/her School helped in the best possible way and
might not connect well during all alumni engagement activities. Thus it becomes a prime importance
to plan the alumni engagement programmes in such a way so as to bring together all the alumnus and
the current students on a common platform. An impressive alumni engagement programme should be
able to overcome few barriers such as : Time, Distance, Commitments to job and family, Not knowing
anyone, Value proposition, Fear of solicitation and lack of interest in the Institution.
There are a number of ways in which the alumni engagement can be increased and which are followed
in most of the B-Schools. Few of them are :
The purpose of this study is to find out the important factors which result into better alumni
engagement and also to find the most important amongst them. The methodology to study this is
through qualitative research in which alums of different B-Schools will be contacted to get
information on the ways their alma mater still maintains the bond with them and ways which the
alumnus thinks it can be improved further.
Research methodology:
Data type
: Primary Data
Research tool
Sample Units
Sampling Method
: Stratified Sampling
Assumptions:
Qualitative Research:
In-depth Interview
For Qualitative Analysis we implemented the method of In-depth interview. We got in touch with
around 7 Alumni across different B-Schools including IIM-A, Great lakes, Army Institute of
Management, SCIT, SIMC. Each interview lasts around 15-30 minutes. Through these interviews we
could get insights on what could be the possible factors of which would drive the Alumni engagement
in B-School
Based on the literature review and in-depth interview, our finding is that below are the reasons for the
alumni to participate:
1. Career opportunities
A lot of alumni respondents keep in touch with the b-school for career opportunities and
services, guidance and prospects to them.
2. Networking platform
The events conducted by the alumni stakeholder group increase network opportunities with
and for the group. This creates solid platform for forming business partnership and mutually
beneficial relationship with each other.
3. Invitation to B-School Events
Alumni attending B-school events will increase the face-to-face networking opportunities
with and for this group, thereby creating a solid foundation for the implementation of a
relationship.
4. B-School reputation
It has been observed that alumni of reputed B-schools take pride in keeping in touch with
their B-schools.
5. Experience in college as a student
Those who had good memories about the B-school show tendency to engage more with the Bschool later.
6. Location and Timing of Alumni meets
Location and timing of alumni meet plays important role in alumni attending B-school alumni
events. It could be due to factors like work, family etc.
Independent Variable:
Certain factors that influence alumni engagement identified are
Nostalgia
Career Opportunities
Networking
College Communication
Career Opportunities
Alumni meets
College Reputation
Dependent Variable:
Alumni Engagement
Hypothesis:
Based on the above mentioned independent and dependent variables, we have formed the
following hypothesis which we would test in our scope of study:
Quantitative Research:
Methodology:
The factors identified based on the Qualitative research and the literature survey, was used as an
input to the quantitative research. We rolled out our questionnaire a week before we started our
analysis on the data. We had a total of 23 questions.
We have used the 5-point Likert scale for the survey. The format of scale was from
Strongly Disagree (1) to Strongly Agree (5).
In a weeks time we could collect more than 150 responses. We used the survey data and SPSS tool
for further analysis. Also we performed the following steps in the below mentioned order to test the
data1. Test of reliability (Cronbach alpha)
To check the validity of internal consistency, that is, how closely related a set of items are as
a group we calculated Cronbach Alpha.The responses which required reverse scoring,
were reverse scored After collecting the first 40 responses the Cronbach alphas were
calculated for all constructs to check the reliability of the questions and scales.We
used the value of alpha at 0.6 as the threshold value and rejected any variable which had a
score below that.
2. Test of Multicollinearity
For further analysis of the data we performed a test of multi-collinearity was performed on
each of the variables using SPSS.
3. Factor Analysis
As we found multi-co linearity amongst the independent variables, we performed a Factor
analysis to extract components for further analysis
4. Regression Analysis
After extracting the factors we finally performed a regression analysis to test the
relationship between the DV and the IVs. We also calculated interaction terms between the
IVs and applied Mean-centring Theorems remove co linearity between the interaction
terms
Results:
1. Test of reliability (Cronbach alpha)
After performing the Cronbach alpha test we found the following results:
Dependent Variable-Amluni Engagement
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
N of Items
Alpha
.714
N of Items
Alpha
.745
N of Items
Alpha
.750
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
N of Items
Alpha
.713
N of Items
Alpha
.696
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
N of Items
Alpha
.732
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
N of Items
Alpha
.879
10
The final data for each construct was generated by taking the mean of the responses for
the questions of that construct.
Interaction among Network and Alumni Variables were supposedly assumed. An
interaction term AlumniNetwork is created.
The output of the bivariate- co-linearity test was the following:Correlations
Nostalgi
Carrer
College
College
Alum Networkin
a-Var1
Opportuniti
Reputatio
Communicati
ni
es- Var2
n- Var5
on- Var6
Meet
g- Var3
AlumniNetw
ork
sVar4
Pearson
Correlati
.502
**
.608
**
.329
**
.470
**
.431
**
.484
**
on
NostalgiaVar1
Sig. (2-
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
116
116
116
116
116
116
116
**
tailed)
N
Pearson
Correlati
Carrer
Opportunities
- Var2
.502
.592
**
.640
**
.602
**
.664
**
.714
**
on
Sig. (2tailed)
N
.000
116
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
116
116
116
116
116
116
**
Pearson
Correlati
College
ReputationVar5
.608
**
.592
.560
**
.636
**
.633
**
.682
**
on
Sig. (2tailed)
N
.000
.000
116
116
116
11
.000
.000
.000
.000
116
116
116
116
Pearson
Correlati
College
Communicati
on- Var6
.329
**
.640
**
.560
**
1 .641
**
.579
**
.681
**
on
Sig. (2tailed)
N
.000
.000
.000
116
116
116
.000
.000
.000
116
116
116
116
**
Pearson
Correlati
.470
**
.602
**
.636
**
.641
.623
**
.881
**
on
Alumni
Meets-Var4
Sig. (2tailed)
N
.000
.000
.000
.000
116
116
116
116
.000
.000
116
116
116
**
Pearson
Correlati
.431
**
.664
**
.633
**
.579
**
.623
.900
**
on
NetworkingVar3
Sig. (2tailed)
N
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
116
116
116
116
116
.000
116
116
**
Pearson
Correlati
.484
**
.714
**
.682
**
.681
**
.881
**
.900
on
AlumniNetwor
k
Sig. (2tailed)
N
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
116
116
116
116
116
116
12
116
Thus we perform Mean Centering of the given data and we try to remove the multi
collinearity due to the interaction term. But even after performing Mean Centring of the
data for Alumni Network we find that the Correlation due to the interaction variable is still
significant.
Correlations
Nostalg
Carrer
College
College
MCNetw
MCAlu
MCAlumniNet
Communicat
ork
mni
work
es- Var2
ion- Var6
on- Var5
Pearson
Correlati
.502
**
.608
**
.329
**
.430
**
.470
**
-.284
**
on
NostalgiaVar1
Sig. (2-
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.002
116
116
116
116
116
116
116
**
tailed)
N
Pearson
Correlati
Carrer
OpportunitiesVar2
.502
.592
**
.640
**
.664
**
.602
**
-.220
on
Sig. (2tailed)
N
.000
116
.000
.000
.000
.000
.017
116
116
116
116
116
116
**
Pearson
Correlati
College
ReputationVar5
Sig. (2tailed)
.592
.560
**
.633
**
.636
**
-.411
**
.000
.000
116
116
.000
.000
.000
.000
116
116
116
116
116
**
Pearson
Communicatio Correlati
n- Var6
**
on
N
College
.608
.329
**
.640
**
.560
on
13
.579
**
.641
**
-.229
Sig. (2tailed)
N
.000
.000
.000
116
116
116
.000
.000
.013
116
116
116
116
**
Pearson
Correlati
.430
**
.664
**
.633
**
.579
.623
**
-.418
**
on
MCNetwork
Sig. (2tailed)
N
.000
.000
.000
.000
116
116
116
116
.000
.000
116
116
116
**
Pearson
Correlati
.470
**
.602
**
.636
**
.641
**
.623
-.407
**
on
MCAlumni
Sig. (2tailed)
N
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
116
116
116
116
116
.000
116
116
**
Pearson
Correlati
-.284
**
-.220
-.411
**
-.229
-.418
**
-.407
on
MCAlumniNet
work
Sig. (2tailed)
N
.002
.017
.000
.013
.000
.000
116
116
116
116
116
116
116
From above table we find Multi Collinearity due to interaction term and independent
variable still exists. Thus we avoid using the mean centred data and interaction terms for
factor and regression analysis
14
3. Factor Analysis:
The result of the factor analysis as performed in SPSS was following:
Communalities
Initial
College Communication-
Extraction
1.000
.795
Alumni Meets-Var4
1.000
.977
Networking- Var3
1.000
.732
Nostalgia-Var1
1.000
.922
1.000
.794
1.000
.746
Var6
Initial Eigenvalues
Loadings
Loadings
ent
Total
% of
Cumulativ
Variance
e%
Total
% of
Cumulativ
Variance
e%
Total
% of
Cumulativ
Variance
e%
3.730
58.172
58.172
3.730
58.172
58.172
2.323
38.722
38.722
1.727
14.119
72.291
1.727
14.119
72.291
1.527
25.447
64.168
1.508
10.461
82.752
1.508
10.461
82.752
1.115
18.583
82.752
.406
6.760
89.512
.370
6.162
95.674
.260
4.326
100.000
15
Component Matrix
Component
1
College Communication-
.769
-.451
.028
Alumni Meets-Var4
.760
.097
.625
Networking- Var3
.820
-.206
-.130
Nostalgia-Var1
.697
.638
-.172
.833
-.184
-.257
.842
.179
-.067
Var6
Since the factor nostalgia was contributing to both the components we performed a factor rotation
which resulted in the following rotated matrix:
Component
1
College Communication-
.829
.036
.327
Alumni Meets-Var4
.307
.278
.898
Networking- Var3
.766
.307
.225
Nostalgia-Var1
.178
.924
.192
.801
.371
.118
.530
.603
.318
Var6
3) to be filled
4. Regression Analysis:
17
18
Conclusion
Exhibits
Exhibit 1: Questionnaire for Survey
1) How often do you go to Alumni Meets?
Always
Often
Sometimes
Rarely
Never
Often
Sometimes
Rarely
Never
3) Are you Updated with the Current Activities of your the Alma Matter?
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
4) Would you be willing or are already mentoring the current students of your college?
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Agree
Agree
7) If given a chance would you like revisit your college for reviving memories?
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
9) Does college's alumni portal update you with the current events, job opportunities etc?
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
10) You are satisfied with your college's Placement office in providing you your desired job?
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
11) You find opportunities of getting referred by the Alumni of your college?
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
12) Your college facilitates entrepreneurship ventures that you wish to carry?
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
13) You agree that your college has contributed to your professional network?
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
14) Alumni groups on college Portals allow you to be in regular touch with friends and seniors?
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Agree
20
17) Your college organizes enough alumni meets so as to result into higher engagement?
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
18) You agree there is any positive outcome from the alumni meets?
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
19) You agree the college takes enough steps to ensure that most of the alumni are present in the
meets?
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Agree
Agree
22) You will be more participative if your college was ranked higher?
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
23) Do you agree that your college hosts topnotch events(Cultural,technical,etc), which adds to your
college reputation?
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Agree
25) You get timely invites from your college for guest lectures and events?
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagre
26) Your College regularly updates the contact details of the alumni?
Strongly Agree
Agree
22
Disagree
Strongly Disagree