Matter of Public Record

Hereby served this day 28th August 2013

Awareness of Truth.
http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/JCO%2fDocuments%2fSpeeches%2fbeatsonj040608.pdf

A quiet constitutional upheaval has been occurring in this country since 1998. That
year saw the enactment of the Human Rights Act and the devolution legislation for
Scotland, Northern Ireland and to a lesser degree, Wales. These developments have
led to new interest in the judiciary. Today, however, I am primarily concerned with
events since June 2003 when the government announced the abolition of the office of
Lord Chancellor, bringing to an end a position in which a senior member of the Cabinet
was also a judge, Head of the Judiciary, and Speaker of the House of Lords. The
government also announced the replacement of the Judicial Committee of the House
of Lords by a United Kingdom Supreme Court.
These events led to the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 (hereafter CRA) and to the
Lord Chief Justice becoming Head of the Judiciary of England and Wales. The 2003
changes and the new responsibilities given to the Lord Chief Justice necessitated a
certain amount of re-examination of the relationship between the judiciary and the two
stronger branches of the state --- the executive and the legislature. Moreover, in the
atmosphere of reform and change, branded as modernisation, not all have always
remembered the long accepted rules and understandings about what judges can
appropriately say and do outside their courts. Others have asked whether the rules
and understandings remain justified in modern conditions. The pressures to which
my title refers arise because of the view of some that judges should be more engaged
with the public, the government, and the legislature than they have been in the past.
The Opportunities arise from the need to develop constitutionally appropriate rules
for such engagement. But before turning to these I must say something about the
constitutional importance of the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary.

Page 1 of 15

What is it that we know as fact from the actions of due diligence and observation, which we can
rely upon as fact?
From the document from recognised official source, namely the office of the judiciary and duly
recognised as a sub office of H.M. Parliaments and governments Plc.
http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/JCO%2fDocuments%2fSpeeches%2fbeatsonj040608.pdf The Rt.
Hon. Lord Justice Sir Jack Beatson FBA noted that
The aim of this paper is to try to offer a definition of the state that is sensitive to these
difficulties. More particularly, it seeks to develop an account of the state that is not subject to
the problems that beset alternative explanations that have been prominent in political theory.
The main points it defends are these.
1) The state should not be viewed as a form of association that subsumes or subordinates all
others.
2) The state is not an entity whose interests map closely onto the interests of the groups and
individuals that fall under its authority, but has interests of its own.
3) The state is, to some extent at least, an alien power; though it is of human construction, it is
not within human control.
4) The state is not there to secure peoples deepest interests, and it does not serve to unify
them, reconcile them with one another, bring their competing interests into harmony, or realize
any important good! Such as justice, freedom, or peace. While its power might be harnessed
from time to time, that will serve the interests of some not the interests of all. 5) The state is
thus an institution through which individuals and groups seek to exercise power (though it is
not the only such institution); but it is also an institution that exercises power over individuals
and groups. 6) The state is, ultimately, an abstraction, for it has no existence as a material
object, is not confined to a particular space, and is not embodied in any person or collection of
persons. The state exists because certain relations obtain between people; but the outcome of
these relations is an entity that has a life of its own, though it would be a mistake to think of it
as entirely autonomous and to define the state is to try to account for the entity that exists
through these relations.
The concept of the state
A state is a form of political association or polity that is distinguished by the fact that it is not
itself incorporated into any other political associations, though it may incorporate other such
associations. The state is thus a supreme corporate entity because it is not incorporated into
any other entity, even though it might be subordinate to other powers (such as another state
or an empire). One state is distinguished from another by its having its own independent
structure of political authority, and an attachment to separate physical territories. The state is
itself a political community, though not all political communities are states. A state is not a
nation, or a people, though it may contain a single nation, parts of different nations, or a
number of entire nations. A state arises out of society, but it does not contain or subsume
society. A state will have a government, but the state is not simply a government, for there
exist, many more governments than there are states. The state is a modern political
construction that emerged in early modern Europe, but has been replicated in all other parts of
the world. The most important aspect of the state that makes it a distinctive and new form of
political association is its most abstract quality: it is a corporate entity.
HM PARLIAMENTS AND GOVERNMENTS PLC is a recognised incorporation or legal
embodiment by an act of registration and is recognised as the principal legal body with sub
offices and officers.
MR LEGAL PERSON is also a recognised legal embodiment, by an act of registration and is
recognised as a legal embodiment by that act of registration by the name MR LEGAL PERSON
and is also the principal of that legal embodiment.
The status of principal embodiments are, equal as they were both created by the same act of
registration as a legal embodiment. As all principal embodiments are recognised as equal in
status, equal state, equal standing then,

Page 2 of 15

The principal legal embodiment by the name MR LEGAL PERSON is equal to but not
greater or less than an any other principal legal embodiment such as HM
PARLIAMENTS AND GOVERNMENTS PLC
MR LEGAL PERSON is therefore not subordinate to HM PARLIAMENTS AND
GOVERNMENTS PLC and HM Parliaments and governments Plc which has no
recognisable authority over MR LEGAL PERSON

MR LEGAL PERSON is therefore not legally subject to, or legally obliged to observe or recognise
any policies held by any other principal legal embodiment unless there is an agreement in
place, entered into under full disclosure between the two principal legal embodiments.
As it is recognised that, the Judiciary is a sub office of HM PARLIAMENTS AND GOVERNMENTS
PLC notably as separate principal legal embodiment from the principal legal embodiment of
MR LEGAL PERSON Then it would also be correct to observe that, the principal legal
embodiment MR LEGAL PERSON is greater in status than the Judiciary and all its sub officers
and officials.
We the principal legal embodiment, do not recognise any authority which we are not subject to,
or have legally agreed to be subject to, or by oath.
We the principal legal embodiment, do not recognise any alleged authority imposed upon us by
a subordinate office within a separate principal legal embodiment.
We the principal legal embodiment, do not consent to pay demands for money imposed upon
us by a separate principal legal embodiment or its subordinate office or officers, without a
prearranged agreement or contract with full disclosure entered into in full knowledge and
understanding by written consent.
We the principal legal embodiment, do not recognise any pre existing obligations imposed upon
us by a separate principal legal embodiment or its subordinate office or officers and any
obligations which have been assumed without full disclosure are therefore and hereby
rescinded with immediate effect add in perpetuity.
We the principal legal embodiment, do not recognise the principal legal embodiment HM
PARLIAMENTS AND GOVERNMENTS PLC as a governing body, we have not agreed to be
governed and we do not require those services. We are quite capable of governing ourselves.
We do not know you, we do not care to know you, we find there are no redeemable qualities
about you. You are a disgrace to this once great nation. A nation which you have financially
raped and pillaged: You have no valid legal claim against us and we refuse to enter into Joinder
with you.
We the principal legal embodiment, do not recognise the subordinate office of borough council
as a governing body, we have not agreed to be governed and we do not require there services.
We are quite capable of governing ourselves. We do not know you, we do not care to know
you, and we find there are no redeemable qualities about you. You are a disgrace to this once
great nation. A nation which you have financially raped and pillaged: You have no valid legal
claim against us and we refuse to enter into Joinder with you.
We the living principal legal embodiment do not recognise the subordinate office of the
judiciary or ministry of justice or any subordinate judges, Magistrates, Bailiffs or Police. You
have been observed to be nothing more than strong arm malicious, enforcement office without
any regard for the truth or justice or the well being of this nation. We do not know you, we do
not care to know you, and we find there are no redeemable qualities about you. We find you
are a disgrace to this once great nation. A nation which you have financially raped and
pillaged: You do not have any authority over us as you claim as you are a subordinate servant
to another equal but not greater than principal legal embodiment which is recognised as
dead. Any authority claimed by you is only as a sub officer or servant of another legal person
that is dead. You have no authority over us and to claim such would be the actions of a
clinically insane person.

Page 3 of 15

It is also duly recognised that you do not have the authority to sign any legal document against
us, in the form of a warrant or liability orders. You do not have the authority it is not lawful let
alone to sign the document and would create a reverse liability if you did so. To do so would
also be a violation of the fraud act 2006 if this was to cause any form of loss to another person.
To grant an application for a warrant or liability order gives the illusion that a warrant or liability
order has been signed and is valid when in fact neither have been signed but to create the
deception that they have been allegedly signed in itself is another Act of fraud and a violation
of the Fraud Act 2006. No further documentation of enforcements is subsequently signed and
any enforcement would then cause a loss and a violation of the said Act by an act of deception.
It has been established at a tribunal which creates a legal/lawful precedence case number WI
05257F that.
The Acts and statutes of HM Parliaments and Governments PLC can only be given force of law
by the consent of the governed. What is mandatory in the first instance is the consent of the
governed which must also be presentable as fact. As the consent of the governed is not
presentable as fact, then the Acts and statutes of HM Parliaments and Governments PLC
cannot be acted upon in any way which would cause loss to the governed. What is mandatory
in this instance is the presentable agreements of sixty three and a half million allegedly
governed to be in place before an Act or Statute can be acted upon.

Page 4 of 15

It has been presented here that with a case number and documented evidence that the above
premise which also proves conclusively that ALL tax inclusive of but not limited to, council tax,
income tax, bedroom tax, road licence fees, duty on beer, wine, cigarettes and fuel, VAT all
constitute a violation of the fraud Act 2006 as it causes a loss to the legal person in every
instance.
These violations have and will continue to have a catastrophic effect on a nations prosperity.
We have created an example, although it be simple as a simple demonstration when extended
out to encompass every commercial activity the costs have become a horrendous financial
burden to the people of this nation, yourselves included. Please refer to supplemental
document: Loaf of Bread on Morrisons Shelf.

Further Catastrophic Commercial Losses Due to Bank Fraud

What is a Bank Loan ?
The issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or
later is the people versus the banks. Lord Acton (http://www.larryhannigan.com/bankloan.htm)
MORTGAGE SUMMARY
Borrower Signs the Banks Loan Contract and Mortgage
Borrowers Signature transforms the Loan Contract into a Financial Instrument worth the Value of the
agreed Loan Amount
Bank Fails to Disclose to Borrower that the Borrower Created an Asset
Loan Contract (Financial Instrument) Asset Deposited with the Bank by Borrower
Financial Instrument remains property of Borrower since the Borrower created it
Bank Fails to Disclose the Banks Liability to the Borrower for the Value of the Asset
Bank Fails to Give Borrower a Receipt for Deposit of the Borrowers Asset
New Money Credit is Created on the Bank Books credited against the Borrowers Financial Instrument
Bank Fails to Disclose to the Borrower that the Borrowers Signature Created New Money that is
claimed by the Bank as a Loan to the Borrower
Loan Amount Credited to an Account for Borrowers Use
Bank Deceives Borrower by Calling Credit a Loan when it is an Exchange for the Deposited Asset
Bank Deceives Public at large by calling this process Mortgage Lending, Loan and similar
Bank Deceives Borrower by Charging Interest and Fees when there is no value provided to the
Borrower by the Bank
Bank Provides None of own Money so the Bank has No Consideration in the transaction and so no True
Contract exists
Bank Deceives Borrower that the Borrowers self-created Credit is a Loan from the Bank, thus there
is No Full Disclosure so no True Contract exists
Borrower is the True Creditor in the Transaction. Borrower Created the Money. Bank provided no
value.
Bank Deceives Borrower that Borrower is Debtor not Creditor
Bank Hides its Liability by off balance-sheet accounting and only shows its Debtor ledger in order to
Deceive the Borrower and the Court
Bank Demands Borrowers payments without Just Cause, which is Deception, Theft and Fraud
Bank Sells Borrowers Financial Instrument to a third party for profit
Sale of the Financial Instrument confirms it has intrinsic value as an Asset yet that value is not credited to
the Borrower as Creator and Depositor of the Instrument

Page 5 of 15

Bank Hides truth from the Borrower, not admitting Theft, nor sharing proceeds of the sale of the
Borrowers Financial Instrument with the Borrower
The Borrowers Financial Instrument is Converted into a Security through a Trust or similar arrangement
in order to defeat restrictions on transactions of Loan Contracts
The Security including the Loan Contract is sold to investors, despite the fact that such Securitization is
Illegal
Bank is not the Holder in Due Course of the Loan Contract
Only the Holder in Due Course can claim on the Loan Contract
Bank Deceives the Borrower that the Bank is Holder in Due Course of the Loan Contract
Bank makes Fraudulent Charges to Borrower for Loan payments which the Bank has no lawful right to
since it is not the Holder in Due Course of the Loan Contract
Bank advanced none of own money to Borrower but only monetized Borrowers signature
Bank Interest is Usurious based on there being No Money Provided to the Borrower by the Bank so that
any interest charged at all would be Usurious
Thus BANK LOAN TRANSACTIONS ARE UNCONSCIONABLE!
Bank Has No True Need for a Mortgage over the Borrowers Property, since the Bank has No
Consideration, No Risk and No Need for Security
Bank Exploits Borrower by demanding a Redundant and Unjust Mortgage
Bank Deceives Borrower that the Mortgage is needed as Security
Mortgage Contract is a second Financial Instrument Created by the Borrower
Deposit of the Mortgage Contract is not credited to the Borrower
Bank Sells the Borrowers Mortgage Contract for profit without disclosure or share of proceeds to
Borrower
Sale of the Mortgage Contract confirms it has intrinsic value as an Asset yet that value is not credited to
the Borrower as Creator and Depositor of the Mortgage Contract
Bank Deceives Borrower that Bank is the Holder in Due Course of the Mortgage
Bank Extorts Unjust Payments from the Borrower under Duress with threat of Foreclosure
Bank Steals Borrowers Wealth by intimidating Borrower to make Unjust Loan Payments
Bank Harasses Borrower if Borrower fails to make payments, threatening Legal Recourse
Bank Enlists Lawyers willing to Deceive Borrower and Court and Exploit Borrower
Bank Deceives Court that Bank is Holder in Due Course of Loan Contract and Mortgage
Banks Lawyers Deceive and Exploit Court to Defraud Borrower
Bank Steals Borrowers Mortgaged Property with Legal Impunity
Bank Holds Borrower Liable for any outstanding balance of original Loan plus costs
Bank Profits from Loan Contract and Mortgage by Sale of the Loan Contract, Sale of the Mortgage, Principal
and Interest Charges, Fees Charged, Increase of its Lending Capacity due to Borrowers Mortgaged Asset
and by Acquisition of Borrowers Mortgaged Property in Foreclosure. Bank retains the amount of increase to
the Money Supply Created by the Borrowers Signature once the Loan Account has been closed.
Borrower is Damaged by the Banks Loan Contract and Mortgage by Theft of his Financial Instrument Asset,
Theft of his Mortgage Asset, Being Deceived into the unjust Status of a Debt Slave, Paying Lifetime Wealth
to the Bank, Paying Unjust Fees and Charges, Living in Fear of Foreclosure, and ultimately having his
Family Home Stolen by the Bank.
Thus the BANK MORTGAGE BUSINESS IS UNCONSCIONABLE.
Further to the corrupt management and administration from our alleged government whos principle task
from its inception which was to create a economically stable environment for the people of this nation to live

Page 6 of 15

in peace and to prosper which was the original purpose when the Barrons of this nation forcefully instructed
King John to give the Royal seal of approval to the Great Charter. It is shown here that this nation has also
suffered additional commercial losses due to the fraudulent activities of the banking world.
What is wrong with this country

This Nation has suffered extensive and horrendous financial damage at the hands of those that we
entrusted with the financial wellbeing of this nation in the form of a duly elected government and the
complete commercial tyranny that has crept into being over the past number of years.

This financial tyranny has been enforced by the countrys judiciary to support the financial tyranny of
the above stated duly elected government.

If this was not bad enough this nation has also suffered the same horrendous treatment from the
banking cartels.

Due to the above commercial tyranny, we the people of this nation, have lost our industry to foreign
interests, our service industry, our livelihoods and our homes

We will tolerate this no longer.

The Corrective Process

We the people who also recognise ourselves now as the Barons and Baronesses of this land as recognised
when the Barons tried to remedy the actions of King John by forcing King John in 1215 to place the Royal
Seal of approval on the Great Charter after he had fleeced the Nation and the Barons took back financial
control of this great land. We the barons demand that our Public Servants recognised as the constabulary
take the following actions:

The judges, the judiciary, the parliamentary members, the bailiffs, the civil enforcement officers are
all guilty of fraud and should be arrested, charged and incarcerated for their crimes against the
people of this nation.
All the directors of the banks who are currently operating in this country and are guilty of fraud are to
be arrested and duly charged and incarcerated for the crimes against the people of this nation.
All assets of the alleged government and the banks to be ceased and the relative companies
foreclosed and re-appropriated under new management.

It is stated under Article 45 of the Magna Carter and we quote We will elect into the position of Judge,
Magistrates, Bailiff, Sheriff, Marshall, Constable, all those that understand the law and wish to mind it well
Where it is duly recognised in this quotation that the we in this quotation are the barons.
If any member of the constabulary feel that they are inadequate in understanding our capability then they
should remove their badge of office and quit the force. Those that remain are charged with the above tasks
and are answerable only to the people of this Nation and no other.
We the people of this nation recognise the recent worldwide exposure of the treason and tyranny that has
been committed against every person on the planet and that due to the recent UCC filings submitted on
public record that all Governments, Banks & Courts have been Foreclosed. The Foreclosure flyer with a
brief description and guidance to further information is enclosed.

The contents of this document are un-contestable facts, what is recognised as facts is truth and what is truth
is law.

Page 7 of 15

YOU HAVE BEEN SERVED ORDERS TO UNDERTAKE BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE BARONS AND THE
PEOPLE OF THIS NATION.

Without Prejudice All Rights reserved

David Ward
Melanie Batty
David Batty
Carl Cunningham

Dated:
.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

There is a loaf of bread on Morrisons Shelf.

There is a loaf of bread on Morrisons shelf. But it didnt just appear there by magic, the loaf of
bread started its journey on John (ME) the farmers farm. Whoops, hang on a minute, John (me)
the farmer pays council tax on his hard standing and that council tax is added to the cost of the
loaf of bread. So John the farmer rises early in the morning to plough the field and plant some
grain. Just hold it right there. In the tractor there is red diesel fuel and that fuel carries a fuel
duty of 36% plus the vat on the duty plus the vat on the diesel and all that tax goes to the cost
of the loaf of bread. So now john has ploughed the field to plant the grain but the grain is not in
the ground yet, the grain has to be sawed.
So john the farmer fires up the tractor again to saw the grain. Just hang on. In the tractor there
is red diesel fuel and that fuel carries a fuel duty of 36% plus the vat on the duty plus the vat
on the diesel and all that tax goes to the cost of the loaf of bread.
Now the grain is sawed and is in the ground and John the farmer has to wait three of six
months whilst the grain grows and is ready for harvesting. Wight a minute, John the farmer
pays council tax on his hard standing and that council tax is added to the cost of the loaf of
bread.
So now it is time for harvesting, John the farmer fires up the big, monster combine harvester
and harvests the field. Woes stop. In the combine harvester there is red diesel fuel and that
fuel carries a fuel duty of 36% plus the vat on the duty plus the vat on the diesel and all that
tax goes to the cost of the loaf of bread. Now John the farmer has a big pile of hay and a whole
pile of grain, so john the farmer calls up Bob the haulage truck driver to carry the grain to the
grain storage silo. Stop the bus right there. Bob haulage truck driver drives a truck on the
road, now this has white diesel fuel in the tank and whit diesel fuel carries a duty of 80% plus
the vat on the duty plus the vat on the diesel and all that tax goes to the cost of the loaf of
bread. Also Bob haulage truck driver pays road tax to drive on the road, also Bob haulage
truck driver pays lives in a house and pays council tax and all that tax goes to the cost of the
loaf of bread.
It gets better the grain has now been delivered to the grain storage silo. Stop. The grain
storage silo company pays commercial council tax and all the employees of that company live
in houses and they all pay domestic council tax and all that tax is added to the cost of the loaf
of bread. Are we beginning to see a trend here? So the grain sits in the storage silo until it is

Page 8 of 15

called upon by the flower mill. Just hang on. Thats even more commercial council tax and all
that tax is added to the cost of the loaf of bread. Thats absolutely correct the tax man just
loves the tax.
So the flour mill calls up Bob the haulage truck driver to carry the grain to the flower mill. Stop,
my ears are bleeding and my brain hurts. No Pain no gain knowing the truth is a painful
experience and if you cant stand the pain go back to sleep and keep paying the tax. Are you
insane? Arent we all, we have been doing this insanity for donkeys years, now shut up and
take it. Nooooo. Bob the haulage truck driver drives a truck on the road, now this has white
diesel fuel in the tank and whit diesel fuel carries a duty of 80% plus the vat on the duty plus
the vat on the diesel and all that tax goes to the cost of the loaf of bread. Also Bob haulage
truck driver pays road tax to drive on the road, also Bob haulage truck driver pays lives in a
house and pays council tax and all that tax goes to the cost of the loaf of bread. Why, why,
Why. Shut up and take it. OMG No.
Now the grain is at the flower mill. Stop plies no, I cant take any more. Shut up and take it,
take it, take it, take the pain what doesnt kill you will only make you stronger. The flower mill
company pays commercial council tax and all the employees of that company live in houses
and they all pay domestic council tax and all that tax is added to the cost of the loaf of bread.
Whimper! Somebody has to pay the tax man now take it.
Having made the grain into flower now the flower is ready to go to another storage depot. St-Suck it up!! The flower mill calls Bob the haulage truck driver to carry the flower to the storage
depot. Bob the haulage truck driver drives a truck on the road, now this has white diesel fuel in
the tank and whit diesel fuel carries a duty of 80% plus the vat on the duty plus the vat on the
diesel and all that tax goes to the cost of the loaf of bread. Also Bob haulage truck driver pays
road tax to drive on the road, also Bob haulage truck driver lives in a house and pays council
tax and all that tax goes to the cost of the loaf of bread.
The storage depot company pays commercial council tax and all the employees of that
company live in houses and they all pay domestic council tax and all that tax is added to the
cost of the loaf of bread. Do you have a gun? Somewhere:
Now the bakery has an order for some bread so they call Bob to collect the flower from the
storage depot and take it to the bakery. Not saying anything anymore. Bob the haulage truck
driver drives a truck on the road, now this has white diesel fuel in the tank and whit diesel fuel
carries a duty of 80% plus the vat on the duty plus the vat on the diesel and all that tax goes to
the cost of the loaf of bread. Also Bob haulage truck driver pays road tax to drive on the road,
also Bob haulage truck driver pays lives in a house and pays council tax and all that tax goes to
the cost of the loaf of bread.
The bakery company pays commercial council tax and all the employees of that company live
in houses and they all pay domestic council tax and all that tax is added to the cost of the loaf
of bread. Can I find that gun? No, youre not allowed a gun its against legislation, besides you
might just use it to shoot the tax man, and we cant have that now: can we? Silence:
So the bakery calls up Bob to take the bread to Morrisons. Silence: Bob the haulage truck
driver drives a truck on the road, now this has white diesel fuel in the tank and whit diesel fuel
carries a duty of 80% plus the vat on the duty plus the vat on the diesel and all that tax goes to
the cost of the loaf of bread. Also Bob haulage truck driver pays road tax to drive on the road,
also Bob haulage truck driver lives in a house and pays council tax and all that tax goes to the
cost of the loaf of bread.
Morrisons is a that company pays commercial council tax and all the employees of that
company live in houses and they all pay domestic council tax and all that tax is added to the
cost of the loaf of bread. What you looking for in that draw? Nothing:
Where you going? Theres a peaceful occupy Downing Street on today I thought I would keep
them company: Whats that in your pocket? Nothing: Well dont be too long, you have work to
do so you can keep paying the tax man: And when you get old youre going to need plenty of
money to spend on the grandkids, things like mobile phones and Xboxs and computer games:
The door closes.
Now the first question is how much is the tax on a loaf of bread when it is still on the shelf? The
tax man has already had more than he should. He does not care if it is sold or it goes stale. It

Page 9 of 15

does not matter who pays for the bread weather the purchaser is employed or unemployed its
all the same to the tax man. So how much is the tax value on a loaf of bread on Morisons
shelf?
If all the tax was removed from the loaf of bread just leaving the cost of each loaf inclusive of
all the growing, manufacture and transport costs, even allowing for some profit for all the
processes involved how much would it cost? The answer to that question will astonish you.
These calculations have been made by two chartered accountants burning the midnight oil and
plenty of coffee. Coffee, cool: Heres the answer.
85% of the cost of the loaf of bread is nothing but TAX: This means that if a loaf of bread costs
1 then the price on the shelf should be 15p. Ouch! Isnt that amazing? Now take this
example and apply it across the board. From a lollypop to a colour TV,
to the tarmac on the road, to the cost of a house or a car. A 20K car would now be say 3K.
Doesnt that sound good, a 100K house would cost 15K. This is an economically valid
example. Let it sink in for a while. -----------------Theres more. We pay 24% of our income out of our gross earning to the NHS. I know if you
are employed you only pay 8% but you boss pays 16% and who do you think earns that 16%?
You do, you pay your part of your bosses 24% as well. Now the NHS pays for a lot of things
such as Hospitals and staff and medication and ambulances and unemployment from the
department of works and pensions. And I hear the words so what well all that money is spent
and the taxman rakes back in 85% of it: Thats 85% that will never return to the NHS. Now you
can also say that our tax is necessary because it pays for the police and the schools and the
bin men and the park keeper and fire brigade: Well this is also true but as that money is spent
the taxman rakes back in 85%. Now the question is when do you get the value of that money?
And the answer in never: Never, ever, ever and if you can find it then let me know.
Theres more. This means that the only money you get to keep is the 15%. Oh s---t yes. That
15% pays for everything ells, your home and furnishings, the car, the holiday, the food, on and
on. Yes you live your life on 15% and that is a fact, oh yes and some credit cards. Now that is
a very sobering thought. This is exactly the reason why we are all broke. So what is it that the
tax man does that makes him worth so much of your life energy???? Anybody please let me
know.
Theres more. The opposite side of the coin! The cost of a 100K house is 15K you could save
up for that in say 5 years on minimum wage and buy the house cash with no mortgage.
Having a mortgage means you pay for three houses and only get to keep one. So you would
save the cost of two houses, thats money back in your pocket that the bank will never see.
Minimum wage would be equal to current day paying tax say 50 per hour. You could buy your
car cash, no loan. We would be a cash rich nation in no time at all and the banks would just be
a service to move our cash around as usual. There would be no national debt. We would have
roads that do not wreck our cars. Let the mind wonder. And dont forget that all tax is illegal, it
contravenes the bills of exchange act and is an act of fraud without the consent of the
governed, and the consent of the governed is not a presentable fact.
So the last observation is? Is it really the Bad Banks that are the problem, and I am not making
any excuses for the Banksters, or is the much larger problem the local and central government
and the tax.

Whats wrong with the world?

What is wrong with the world and what can we do about it?

Page 10 of 15

BANKS & GOVERNMENTS

FORECLOSED WORLDWIDE
The One Peoples Public Trust (OPPT) announced the foreclosure of the worlds banks and governments
on
December 25th 2012 stemming from prior investigation into massive fraud across the entire system:
http://i-uv.com/oppt-absolute/oppt-initial-investigation/
What happened?
The OPPT posed to the worlds Banks and Governments:
1. that they had by deceptive acts and practices been stealing from the people for hundreds of years, and;
2. nothing stood between the Creator and each of the Creators creations,

Page 11 of 15

and gave due opportunity to rebut both statements. They could not and did not. To understand this fully
please read
the Declaration of Facts at http://i-uv.com/oppt-absolute/original-oppt-ucc-filings/> UCC Filings > 2012 ptII >
Declaration of Facts. Here are two excerpts:
Government Charters Cancelled: (Refer: DECLARATION OF FACTS: UCC Doc # 2012127914 Nov 28 2012)
...That any and all CHARTERS, inclusive of The United States Federal Government, UNITED STATES,
STATE
of ...", Inclusive of any and all abbreviations, idem sonans, or other legal, financial or managerial forms, any
and
all international equivalents, inclusive of any and all OFFICES, inclusive of any and all OFFICERS, PUBLIC
SERVANTS, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, TREATIES, CONSTITUTIONS, MEMBERSHIP, ACTS, and any and all
other contracts and agreements made thereunder and thereby, are now, void, worthless, or otherwise
cancelled,
unrebutted; ...
Bank Charters Cancelled: (Refer: TRUE BILL: WA DC UCC Doc# 2012114776 Oct 24 2012)
Declared and ordered irrevocably cancelled; any and all charters for Bank of International Settlements (BIS)
members thereto and thereof including all beneficiaries, including all certain states of body owning,
operating,
aiding and abetting private money systems, issuing, collection, legal enforcement systems, operating
SLAVERY
SYSTEMS commandeering lawful value by unlawful representation...
Orders to Cease and Desist:
Attention is drawn to DECLARATION AND ORDER: UCC Doc # 2012096074, Sept. 09 2012, duly
reconfirmed and
ratified by COMMERCIAL BILL UCC Doc. No. 2012114586 and TRUE BILL UCC Doc. No.2012 114776
which states:
Volunteers within the military ... to arrest and take into custody any and all certain states of body, their
agents,
officers, and other actors, regardless of domicil by choice, owning, operating, aiding and abetting private
money
systems, issuing, collection, legal enforcement systems, operating SLAVERY SYSTEMS against the several
states citizens, ..., and Repossess all private money systems, tracking, transferring, issuing, collection,
legal
enforcement systems operating SLAVERY SYSTEMS...
...all beings of the creator shall forthwith assist all Public Servants identified herein, to implement, protect,
preserve and complete this ORDER by all means of the creator and created as stated herein, by, with, and
under your full personal liability...
Search document numbers listed at the Washington DC UCC Registry: https://gov.propertyinfo.com/DCWashington/
What does this mean to you?
Are you paying a debt to a foreclosed entity..? e.g. mortgage, credit card, car loan?
OPPT has foreclosed on hierarchy. No one stands between you and your creator... not even Government.
Because a CEASE AND DESIST order exists, you are free to offer terms and conditions to individuals acting
on behalf
of a foreclosed Bank or Government, by issuing a Courtesy Notice.
What does this mean to Banks & Governments?

Page 12 of 15

All beings now act in the capacity of individual entities without a corporate safety net and with full personal
liability for
each and EVERY ACTION THEY TAKE under common law, protected and preserved by public policy UCC 1103, and
Universal law, the governing law laid out in the OPPT UCC filings. (Refer: WA DC UCC Ref Doc #
2012113593)
Should any individual pursue any actions on behalf of a foreclosed Bank or Government, causing another
individual
any damage as herein described, they in their individual and unlimited capacity are absolutely liable. Such
actions may
result in the receipt of a Courtesy Notice.
Courtesy Notice

Page 13 of 15

The Courtesy Notice contains the information of this flyer and offers terms and conditions for future dealings.
Whereas Banks and Governments have been foreclosed worldwide... Acts, Statutes, Codes, Courts,
Executive
Orders etc were thereby foreclosed, thus without a lawfully binding contract -individual to individual, no
instrument
exists to compel performance.
The Courtesy Notice offers new terms to any individual of a foreclosed entity for their acceptance and the
method of
acceptance is clearly defined.
Individuals are now downloading and sending Courtesy Notices worldwide; 64,000 were downloaded in the
first two
days following release in early Feb 2013. See http://www.i-uv.com
What is the UCC -Where and to whom does it apply?
The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) is the bible of commerce and used world wide, but sometimes in
disguise.
UCC is not taught in law schools; it is used in high level banking and government corporations. Accordingly
most
lawyers, attorneys and magistrates know nothing about UCC and will argue it has no application.
1. Executive Order 13037 dated 04 Mar 1997 defined humans as capital. See:
http://americankabuki.blogspot.com.au/2013/03/us-citizens-defined-as-property-of.html
2. UCC Doc # 0000000181425776 filed 12 Aug 2011 evidences sale of US citizens in transaction between
The
Federal Reserve System and The United States Department of the Treasury 1789 for $14.3 trillion. (Linked
above)
3. UCC Doc #2001059388 evidences the template the Federal Reserve Bank of New York uses to secure
the
collateral in major banks around the world... including chattel paper, goods and the unborn young of animals.
See
http://www.mediafire.com/view/?3yh79cjnzcwzu0s
Those who would regard the UCC as irrelevant outside the US are thereby claiming former funding
arrangements with
the Federal Reserve Bank of New York null and void.
Due Diligence
Given the usage of UCC filings in the upper levels of government and banks worldwide, due diligence is a
necessity.
If there is a dispute, error, or falsity make AND deliver a duly verified sworn DECLARATION OF REBUTTAL
to the
duly verified, sworn and REGISTERED OPPT DECLARATION OF FACTS, point by point, with specificity and
particularity, with full responsibility and liability, under the penalty of perjury under any law you identify, that
the
forgoing is true and accurate, signed by your wet-ink signature.
To date, no such rebuttal has been registered.
Further Research
Radio shows:

Page 14 of 15

http://i-uv.com/media/radio-shows/
All People Declared Free of Debt (Refer Notice of Declaration of Absolute Truth UCC# 2013032035)
The final filing of the OPPT occurred on March 18, 2013. This document terminated all remaining man-made
entities
and returned all people of this planet to absolute freedom. In this document the creator is referred to as
"absolute
essence" and all creations people are referred to as "absolute essence embodied".
Article VI states..."I duly verify, with full responsibility and liability, by DECLARATION OF ORDER, that
eternal
essence IS made transparent and known by the DO'ing of any and all embodiment of eternal essence in
eternal
essence's universe, IS free and free of debt, unrebutted."
This means THERE IS NO DEBT.
You have no debt... No one has debt... it is done.

Page 15 of 15