Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Chapter 8
INTERMEDIARIES
REGULATION
On 15 January 2005 the Financial Services Authority became the regulatory entity overseeing the activities of insurance agents, as a
result of the Financial Services & Markets Act 2000.
The FSA has four statutory objectives:
(a) to maintain market confidence in the financial system;
(b) to increase public awareness;
(c) to ensure consumer protection; and
(d) to prevent and reduce financial crime.
The FSA has eleven Core Principles for Business with which authorised entities should comply:
1. A firm must conduct its business with integrity.
2. A firm must conduct its business with due skill, care and diligence.
3. A firm must take reasonable care to organise and control its affairs responsibly and effectively, with adequate risk
management systems.
4. A firm must maintain adequate financial resources.
5. A firm must observe proper standards of market conduct.
6. A firm must pay due regard to the interests of its customers and treat them fairly.
7. A firm must pay due regard to the information needs of its clients, and communicate information to them in a way which is
clear, fair and not misleading.
8. A firm must manage conflicts of interest fairly, both between itself and its customers and between a customer and another
client.
9. A firm must take reasonable care to ensure the suitability of its advice and discretionary decisions for any customer who is
entitled to rely upon its judgment.
10. A firm must arrange adequate protection for clients assets when it is responsible for them.
11. A firm must deal with its regulators in an open and cooperative way, and must disclose to the FSA appropriately anything
relating to the firm of which the FSA would reasonably expect notice.
The FSA also has certain Threshold Conditions which must be met by an agent, as follows:
The FSA must be satisfied that the firm has adequate resources. Adequacy of resources is not just about financial resources. The FSA
also looks at whether the firm has adequate management and staff, both in terms of quantity and quality.
Robert Merkin
In December 2001 it was decided that the FSA would regulate the sale and administration of general insurance contracts. The FSA
subsequently produced several Consultation Papers as part of its due process, with the intention of liaising with the relevant markets
in order to produce a set of rules that reflected not only the standards and practices of those markets but also to provide either a better
deal or greater certainty for the consumer of insurance and reinsurance products. Following receipt and consideration of all responses
the FSA has produced an appropriate set of rules. The predominant rule book for matters of insurance is entitled Insurance: Conduct
of Business Source Book (abbreviated to ICOB), set out in seven sections and directing the user to the appropriate sections of other
rule books where appropriate. ICOB implements various provisions contained in the IMD, the Distance Mediation Directive, the
Consolidated Life Directive, the Third Non-Life Directive and the Fourth Motor Insurance Directive. ICOB applies to any insurance
intermediary, which is defined as a firm carrying on an insurance mediation activity, i.e. one which deals with the regulated activities
specified in the Regulated Activities Order and includes those parties assisting in the administration and performance of a contract of
insurance. ICOB does not apply to reinsurance contracts but it does apply to agents carrying out reinsurance mediation activities.
In addition other requirements may need to be discharged, including, for example, those in the Training and Competence
Sourcebook, to the effect that its employees are competent; that its employees remain competent for the work they do; that its
employees are appropriately supervised; that its employees competence is regularly reviewed; and that the level of competence is
appropriate to the nature of the business.
The beauty of the system from the FSAs point of view is that if it considers that a broker is doing something which the FSA feels
it should not be doing, but that activity does not fall squarely as a breach of a specific regulation, it may be able to call upon the Core
Principles to discipline the broker.
(3) What is the effect of the liquidation of the reinsured on a reinsurance contract concluded after that liquidation, and are there any
remedies available to the reinsurer against the reinsured or its broker?
(4) Does the ratification by the reinsured of the contract placed by the broker in excess of his authority automatically exonerate the
broker from acting unlawfully?
(5) What is an agent to insure?
(6) Can a broker ever be liable for non-disclosure or misrepresentation to the reinsurer?
(7) Would a material fact of the reinsured known by the postboy of the broker be attributed to the reinsured and therefore be
disclosable to the reinsurer?
(8) Does the fraud of the broker upon the reinsured, which impacts on the reinsurance, have any effect on the validity of the
reinsurance?
Robert Merkin
(9) What steps should a broker take to ensure that he is not responsible for the collection of claims many years after placement?
(10) What should a broker do when faced with an ambiguity in his instructions?
(11) Should a broker accept his instructions at face value or should he check that they reflect the actual needs of the reinsured?
(12) Should a broker convey to the reinsured every doubt that he may have about the intended security of the reinsurer, or should
he make an overall decision as to its solvency?
(13) How much reinsurance law should a broker know?
(14) For what purpose does a broker receive payment, and from whom?
(15) What is the maximum period within which legal proceedings should be commenced for a broker who has failed to pass on all
material information, which has resulted in avoidance of the contract by the reinsurer?
Robert Merkin