Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Luton et al.
[45]
[54]
METHOD OF EXTRUDING
STRENGTHENED
4,647,304
gzzlmgnResgggai?dpglfmerng
y
' '
ABS
TR ,
[22]
[57]
3/1987
Apr. 4, 1989
[73] Asslgnee'
Date of Patent:
4,818,481
Cr
Mar. 9, 1987
[51]
[52]
[58]
I2- = R02 + Kx
419/13; 419/41
_
[56]
References cued
U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
3,874,938
4,297,l36
Pickens et al. . . . . . .
point x along the major axis of the die ori?ce from its
entry plane, R0 is the radius of the billet, and K is an
arbitrary mumm
. . . . .. 419/11
US. Patent
Apr. 4, 1989
Sheet 2 of 12
4,818,481
com
hm2<>OZ
I/.-/.
5uzl2pu.om
Tnmb.nx._
/|l
omak.zut
_
_
_
_
02.8m8w8.a
com
00*
can
com
on:
N950E
US. Patent
Apr. 4, 1989
Sheet 3 0f 12
Figure 3
4,818,481
US. Patent
Apr. 4, 1989
Sheet 4 0f 12
I-
u2e3mt-1zca.; <RM1z_2.D5_3<
4,818,481
com00*con
TMYEnx
o$3.52
COM00F
con
cQv
Dd"
con
CON
cow
w959. .
US. Patent
Apr. 4, 1989
Sheet 5 of 12
4,818,481
com
TJWEnx
JL/
c38
.o
00M00'
lI
com
com
Dd"
cow
com
DON
cow
m ak z h
, m950E
US. Patent
Apr. 4, 1989
u2n3EtI-zC.S? <NmpzI_2t.Ilj;<
Sheet 6 0f 12
I-.- I
MI
_|
I
2nn//
x
lam<//Iunt-E
com
4,818,481
com
DdW
/|
con
Il
DON
_
_
_
_
comoov.cow0
0u.mekumzwh
m025E
00?
US. Patent
Apr. 4, 1989
Sheet 8 of 12
4,818,481
c6a0on*m
TATEnx
.m0akmnih
OONcop
/.
com
cow
DdW
com
com
cop
m0.52m
US. Patent
Apr. 4, 1989
Sheet 9 0f 12
lOnm
Figure 9b
4,818,481
US. Patent
Apr. 4, 1989
Sheet 10 0f 12
4,818,481
US. Patent
Apr. 4, 1939
Sheet 11 of 12
IZX
FIG.H
4,818,481
US. Patent
Apr. 4, 1989
Sheet 12 0f 12
FIG.|2
4,818,481
4,818,481
porosity.
free of texture.
cles;
low interparticle spacing (<200nm);
35
energy mill, such as the Szeguari attritor. Such a pro 45 aluminum powder particles. This dispersion strength
ened aluminum material, commonly known as sintered
cess is taught in US. Patent No. 3,591,362 for produc
practice.
In order to produce aluminum dispersion strength
ened materials without the disadvantages of the sintered
powder materials, mechanical alloying methods were
used. Such techniques generally produce a more homo
geneous material and offer more accurate and precise
4,818,481
where
45
R is the radius of the die contour at any given point x
plane;
symbols).
FIG. 2 is a plot of the 0.2% proof stress versus tem
50
4,818,481
and kinetics are favorable for the formation of ex 25 1300 C. Preferred are oxy-nitrides and oxides. Such
aluminum oxy-nitride.
4,818,481
Ni, Ti, Zr, Co, Cu, and Mn. Additives to aluminum and 5 bly no more than about 5 times, and most preferably no
the amounts added are well known in the art.
along the major axis of the die ori?ce from the entry
' 25
given by:
4,818,481
10
degrees.
In general, the present invention is practiced by plac
gether.
Comparative Example B
where
R is the radius of the die contour at any given point X
along the major axis of the die ori?ce from its entry 50
plane;
TABLE I
4 CREEP RUPTURE DATA FOR NOVAMET IN 9052-F
Temperature
Applied Stress
C.
MPa
177
232
232
68.9
51.8
68.9
232
275
275
103.4
51.8
68.9
Time to Rupture
h
332+
2592+
242
0.7
1004
6.4
TABLE II
CREEP RUPTURE DATA FOR NOVAMET IN 9021-F T-651
Temperature
Applied Stress
C.
MPa
Comparative Example A
177
232
232
232
275
275
275
103.4
68.9
86.1
102.4
51.8
68.9
75.8
600+
3264+
4642
13.2
5230+
1121
377.8
Time to Rupture
4,818,481
11
TABLE II-continued
Temlfgame
Applifiiasmss
Tmem Rupture
275'
861
05
'
12
TABLE IV
TABLE III
.
PARTICLE SIZE
10
Temperature
Strain Rate/
Yield Stress
Alumina
Particle
Standard
Aspect
"C.
MPa
Content %
Size pm
Deviation
Ratio
10-3
103
10-3
10-3
10-3
10-3
412
410
340
176
113
72
3
7
10
15
14.6
15.5
19.6
17.9
12.7
13.0
15.9
14.9
.612
.591
.565
.617
25
125
175
225
275
325
3
3
3
3
3
3
x
x
X
X
x
x
375
3 X 10*3
52
425
3 X 10-3
34
15
Results
325, 375 and 425 C. The 0.2% offset proof stress was
determined for each of the test samples and these data
are tabulated in Tables V, VI and VII and plotted
against the test temperature in FIGS. 4 to 6. In addition,
observations were made on the microstructures of the 35 aluminum 3% alumina alloy were swaged to a 70%
45
Temperature
Strain Rate/
Yield Stress
'C.
MPa
10-3
10-3
1o3
10-3
10-3
10-3
10~3
10-3
450
443
373
223
206
163
110
105
25
125
175
225
275
325
375
425
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
><
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
ous ?ow of dry argon and then removed from the mill.
The powders were screened to remove particles greater
than 250 um and then charged into aluminum cans
TABLE VI
COMPRESSION TEST DATA FOR
ALUMINUM/OXYNITRIDE-7% ALUMINA AS HIPPED
Temperature
Strain Rate/
Yield Stress
C.
MPa
25
125
3 x 10-3
3 X 10-3
511
493
175
3x 10-3
- 443
22s
275
325
375
425
3
3
3
3
3
x
x
x
x
x
103
1o3
1o~3
10-3
10-3
223
196
146
104
105
4,818,481
13
14
TABLE v11
TABLE IX-continued
c.
MPa
25
3 x 10-3
504
125
175
3 x 10-3
3 x 10-3
495
451
225
275
325
375
42s
3
3
3
3
3
323
206
163
99
105
x
x
x
x
X
10-3
10-3
10-3
103
10-3
TABLE VIII
ALUMINUM/OXYNITRIDE-3%
ALUMINA AS EXTRUDED AND SWAGED
Applied Stress
Time to Rupture
C.
MPa
232
232
34.5
68.9
10,986
5,491+
232
103.4
215 +
275
51.8
275
68.9
452 +
275
103.4
310+
Yield Stress
MPa
10-3
10-3
10-3
10-3
207
163
140
135
3
3
3
3
x
x
x
x
Results
Comparison of the data in Tables V to VII and repre
15 sented in FIGS. 4 to 6 show that the alloys prepared in
10,773
Strain Rate/
C.
275
325
375
425
Temperature
Temperature
truded at 450 C. at ram speed of 5 mm/s into round 35 trol recrystallization and grain growth at high tempera
bars 18 mm in diameter. Samples of material cut from
tures, resulting in an L extremely uniform grain Size,
these bars were prepared as 7.2 X 5.1 mm diameter com
typically 0.05 pm in diameter. This compares with the
conventionally mechanically alloyed material, of Com
pression samples and tested in the manner described
parative Example B, where no evidence for these ?ne
above. These data are given in Table IX and the 0.2%
dispersoids was found and the grain size is non-uniform
proof stress as a function of temperature is shown in
FIG. 8.
and the mean grain diameter is typically 0.5 pm.
The fact that the high temperature strength, in partic
For each extruded rod, a sample was cut perpendicu
ular is imparted by the ultra-fine aluminum oxy-nitride
lar to the extrusion axis and was analyzed for texture by
particles, is the observation that the 0.2% proof stress
use of a Rigaku DMAX-II-4 diffractometer combined
with an automatic pole ?gure device. Data were col 45 versus temperature curves, for alloys containing 3%,
7% and 15% of the added alumina, overlap almost
lected for the <200>reflection. The Decker method
exactly. In other words, the proof stress of the alloys,
was employed in transmission and the Schultz method
prepared by the present invention, exhibit the same
in re?ection so that the entire pole ?gure could be ob
strength at all temperature independent of the amount
tained (R. D. Cullity, Elements of X-ray Diffraction,
of alumina that is initially added to the mill. This effect
Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass, 1967, pp. 285-295).
is explained by realizing that the Strength level provided
As shown in FIG. 12, the pole ?gure obtained on the
ALUMINUM/OXYNITRIDE-3%
ALUMINA AS EXTRUDED AND SWAGED
Temperature
Strain Rate/
Yield Stress
C.
MPa
10~3
103
10-3
10-3
456
443
373
253
25
125
175
225
3
3
3
3
x
x
x
x
55