Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
GROUP MEMBERS:
1) NURFAZILA BINTI MOHD FAUZI
2) NURULHIDAYAH BINTI ABDUL JALIL
3) NUR FATIN BT ABDUL RAHAMAN
4)
CE094112
CE094202
CE093472
TABLE OF CONTENT
NO
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
CONTENT
Summary/Abstract
Objective
Theory
Apparatus
Procedure
Data and Observations
Results and Analysis
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Appendices
PAGE
3
3
4-5
6
7
8-9
10
11
12
12
13
SUMMARY/ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE
1. To determine the pressure head, velocity head and static head
and compare it with Bernoullis Theorem.
2. To compare the theoretical total head with experimental total
head.
3. To observe the conservation of energy through the varying of
diameter along a tube used.
THEORY
3
HT = total head
m
V = velocity
m/sec
P = pressure
Newton/m3
Z = Elevation
m
G = Acceleration dur to gravity
=
9.81 m/sec2
3
= Density
kg/m
(1)
(2)
(3)
(6) (7)
(4) (5)
(8)
FLOW
(Total head)
D5=19.6mm
D7=25.2mm D8=28mm
If point 1 and point 2 are different diameters, then and V 1 and V2 are
different. This is demonstrated by difference in manometer water
levels between point 1 and point 2. At the same time we can
compare total head at any point along the Venturi tube using total
head probe whose total head is shown on tube no. 7:
OR
APPARATUS
PROCEDURE
Diamete
r
(mm)
Diamete
r
(m)
Volum
e
(m)
0.0280
C/Sectio
n
(m)
( x 10 )
6.16
28.0
21.0
0.0210
3.46
0.004
14.0
0.0140
1.54
0.004
16.8
0.0168
2.22
0.004
19.6
0.0196
3.02
0.004
22.4
0.0224
3.94
0.004
25.2
0.0252
4.99
0.004
28.0
0.0280
6.16
0.004
0.004
10
Time
(s)
15
20
28.0
0
28.0
0
28.0
0
28.0
0
28.0
0
28.0
0
28.0
0
28.0
0
17.0
0
17.0
0
17.0
0
17.0
0
17.0
0
17.0
0
17.0
0
17.0
0
12.0
0
12.0
0
12.0
0
12.0
0
12.0
0
12.0
0
12.0
0
12.0
0
Q
(m/s) ( x10 )
10
15
20
1.43
2.35
3.33
1.43
2.35
3.33
1.43
2.35
3.33
1.43
2.35
3.33
1.43
2.35
3.33
1.43
2.35
3.33
1.43
2.35
3.33
1.43
2.35
3.33
10
Velocity
(m/s)
15
20
0.23
2
0.41
3
0.92
9
0.64
4
0.47
4
0.36
4
0.28
7
0.23
2
0.38
1
0.96
2
2.16
2
1.05
9
0.77
8
0.59
6
0.47
1
0.38
1
0.54
1
0.96
2
2.16
2
1.50
0
1.10
3
0.84
5
0.66
7
0.54
1
Total Head
HT (m)
10
15
20
0.22
6
0.22
6
0.22
0.28
4
0.28
4
0.28
0.37
5
0.37
5
0.37
10
Velocity Head
Hv (m)
15
20
2.74 x 10
7.40 x 10
0.015
8.69 x 10
0.023
0.047
0.044
0.119
0.238
0.021
0.057
0.115
0.011
0.031
0.062
6.72 x 10
0.018
0.036
4.20 x 10
0.011
0.023
2.74 x 10
7.40 x 10
0.015
10
Static Head
Hs (m)
15
20
0.218
0.267
0.348
0.208
0.252
0.319
0.145
0.124
0.072
6
0.22
6
0.22
6
0.22
6
0.22
6
0.22
6
4
0.28
4
0.28
4
0.28
4
0.28
4
0.28
4
5
0.37
5
0.37
5
0.37
5
0.37
5
0.37
5
0.150
0.148
0.149
0.184
0.203
0.232
0.194
0.220
0.264
0.226
0.284
0.375
0.202
0.235
0.295
Observations.
1. At any flow rate, manometer recording (static head) at tube No.8 is lower than tube No.1 despite Venturi tube
diameter is the same. This difference represents friction loss between point 1 and point 8.
2. As total head probe is slowly moving from point No.1 and point No.8, the total head probe reading at tube
No.7 slowly decrease. This also demonstrates friction loss as the total head probe move along the length of
the Venturi tube.
10
DISCUSSION
From this experiment, we have venturi tube with different
diameter along the tube or in other words varying cross section.
From the data and observation, we can see that varying diameter
along the venturi tube will affect the changes of elevation tube and
also its total head and static head. Besides that, different diameter
along the tube will have different velocity. The smallest diameter
along the tube which is at point no. 3 has bigger velocity due to the
equation Q= AV, which is cross section (area) of the tube, is
inversely proportional with velocity.
At any flow rate, manometer recording of tube no.1 and no.8
is different even though they have same diameter (cross section).
This happen because of the friction loss between tube no.1 and
no.8. As total head probe is slowly moving from point No.1 and
point No.8, the total head probe reading at tube No.7 slowly
decrease. This also demonstrates friction loss as the total head
probe move along the length of the Venturi tube.
There are lots of difficulties faced and errors that might
occurred when the experiment is conducted. Firstly, the reading
value from the experiment is not too accurate. This might happen
due to the unstable equipment and influence of touching. Therefore,
to eliminate this error we have to make sure that the manometer
tube is free from any air bubble before taking the data because this
air bubble will surely affect the result. Furthermore, we are advised
to repeat our experiment at least 3 times and take the average
value. Secondly, parallax error also might occur because the
manometer tube is placed quite low. So, make sure that our eyes
11
CONCLUSION
From this experiment, our objectives which are to determine
the pressure head, velocity head and static head and compare it
with Bernoullis Theorem, to compare the theoretical total head with
experimental total head and to observe the conservation of energy
through the varying of diameter along a tube used are achieved. In
conclusion, different/varying diameter along the tube will affect the
changes of elevation tube, its total head, static head and also the
velocity. The theoretical total head and experimental total head are
slightly different because some errors are occurs and friction loss.
From this experiment we also can conclude that, when the
diameter along the tube is big, the water velocity will decrease in
order to maintain a constant flow rate. This decreasing means that
kinetic energy has also decrease and therefore pressure energy
must increase to counter balance the change.
REFERENCES
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernoulli's_principle
12
APPENDICES
Figure 2: Venturi
13
14
15
16