Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
University of California Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The
Journal of Musicology.
http://www.jstor.org
Commentary
Philo on Music
SIEGMUND
LEVARIE
PHILO
ON MUSIC
God invests the seventh day with dignity to celebrate the completion of the whole world. Philo doubts "whether anyone could adequately celebrate the properties of the number 7, for they are beyond
all words. Yet the fact that it is more wondrous than all that is said
about it is no reason for maintaining silence."2 The number 7 is a
"bringer of perfection." It is "absolutely harmonious and ... the
source of the most beautiful musical arrangement [diagrdmmatos]
which contains all the intervals [harmonias]:the fourth, fifth, and octave; and the arithmetic, geometric, and harmonic progressions [analogias] as well. The mathematical table is formed out of the numbers
6, 8, 9, 12. Now 8:6 is as 4:3, the interval [harmonia]of the fourth; 9:6
is as 3:2, the interval of the fifth; 12:6 is as 2:1, that of the octave."
Philo lists "all these qualities and more" related to the "marvelous
nature" of the number 7 but returns, here and elsewhere, to stressing
its influence by way of music, one of the "noblest of sciences."
The virtues of the quantity 7 are explained by the "beautiful
sounds" of the musical world-the opposite of the approach modern
physicists would take. For Philo, numbers are symbols of deeper
truths, best revealed through music. He asks, "why are there io commandments? io high holidays? a fast on the loth day of the period of
Atonement?" (De specialibus legibus II, 200). Again he refers to the
musical intervals mentioned above, adding that lo "also contains the
ratio of 9:8 [the wholetone], so that it sums up fully and perfectly the
leading truths of musical science, and for this reason [italics mine] io
has received its name of the all-perfect."
Such statements are not startling in a world oriented toward
sound and music rather than sight and touch. Philo lived in a period
of decisive spiritual change. In the Old Testament, God is a voice. He
creates the world by saying, "Let there be." He speaks to mortals but
does not show himself. In the New Testament, God becomes visible.
He appears on this earth. Most of Philo's metaphors and allegories are
still acoustical. "For as the lyra or any musical instrument is out of
tune [ekmeles]if even one tone and nothing more be false [apodos],but
in harmony when a single plucking produces consonant sounds, so it
is the same way with the instrument of the soul which is dissonant
[asymphonon]when stretched too far by rashness toward the highest
pitch or when it is relaxed beyond measure by cowardice and loosened toward the lowest" (De ebrietate116).
2
The English text throughout this essay is that of the Loeb Classical Library (12
volumes), with modifications based on my own translation from the Greek. The modifications affect particularly, but not exclusively, musical terms which understandably
troubled the otherwise superior philologists.
125
THE JOURNAL
126
OF MUSICOLOGY
PHILO
ON MUSIC
sound and unshapen noise because it is ruled by the mind, its herald
and interpreter"
Having praised the human voice as the "chief and most perfect of
all instruments" which sets "a pattern made ready beforehand for the
instruments that were to be fashioned artificially," Philo turns to the
structure of the ear (De posteritateCaini 103 ff., probably leaning on
Cicero's similar exposition in De natura deorum II, 159): "Nature
turned [the ear] with her lathe, and made it spherical, drawing circles
within circles, lesser within larger, in order that the sound that approached it might not escape and be dispersed outside of it, but that
the thing heard might be collected and enclosed within by the circles,
and being as it were poured through them, be conveyed into the
receptacles of the mind. We see here at once a model for the theatres
seen in thriving cities, for theatres are constructed in exact imitation
of the shape of the ear." Along the same lines, Philo explains that the
windpipe in the human throat is structured precisely so as to be able
to sing all genera, modes, and intervals, by step or skip. Instruments
are merely imitations of this natural model. But both voice and instruments must be controlled by our mind. "Forjust as an instrument
put into the hands of an unmusical person is tuneless, but in the
hands of a musician answers to the skill which he possesses and becomes tuneful, in exactly the same way speech or sound set in motion
by a worthless mind is without tune, but when set going by a worthy
one is discovered to be in perfect tune." Elsewhere he comments: "It
is our business not to practice music unmusically" (Quod deteriuspotiori
insidiari solet 17-18).
Metaphor and analogy provide a ready link to musical practices.
Tone qualities and behavior set a model for human qualities and
behavior. Musical instruments are proportionally marked off to give
each tone its fitting pitch and adapt it so as to sound well together with
other tones. Similarly man should apportion his actions in "proper
sections" (De sacrificiisAbelis et Caini 74). The soul must be set "like a
lyra musically, not with high and low tones but with the knowledge of
moral opposites . . . not stretching it to excessive heights nor yet relaxing and loosening the harmony of virtues and things naturally
beautiful, but keeping it ever at a proper tension, striking it and
accompanying it on a stringed instrument in tune" (Quod Deus immutabilis sit 24).
The last, incidental phrase creates a concrete image of a performance practice: instrumental support of a vocal monody. A similar
situation is described, again incidentally, in Philo's report on his legation to Gaius (De legatione ad Gaium 42). He found the emperor so
"fascinated by the music of kithara and choral singers [that he] occa-
127
THE JOURNAL
128
OF MUSICOLOGY
PHILO
ON MUSIC
careful metrical arrangements to fit the various turns and counterturns. After him others take over as they are arranged and in the
proper order while all the rest listen in complete silence except when
they have to chant the closing lines and closing sections [ephymnia],for
then they all, men and women, lift up their voices. When everybody
has finished his hymn, young men bring in the supper ... after which
they hold the sacred vigil conducted in the following way. They rise all
up together and standing in the middle of the refectory they first
form themselves into two choirs, one of men and one of women, the
leader and director chosen for each being the most honoured
amongst them and also the most musical. Then they sing hymns to
God composed of many meters and melodies, sometimes chanting
together, sometimes antiphonally, hands and feet keeping time in
accompaniment, and rapt with enthusiasm they execute now the music of the processional, now of the epodes (stdsima)and of the strophes
and antistrophes of the dances. Then when each choir has done its
part in the feast, having drunk as in the Bacchic rites of the strong
wine of God's love, they mix and both together become a single choir"
(De vita contemplativa64 ff.).
The description of the final music of the scene raises some questions. In classical Greek drama, four centuries before Philo, the chorus was governed by an established structure. One half of the entire
group made a poetical, musical statement, the strophe or turn. The
other half answered with a parallel counterstatement, the antistrophe
or counterturn. Then they joined for a crowning summation, the
epode or stand (stasimon).Did Philo list the closing stasimonbefore the
strophes to convey a sense of the "rapt enthusiasm" of the feast? Or
did his generation no longer pay much attention to the classical choric
behavior? Or did Philo merely mix what he remembered of the formal arrangement of a Greek drama with his clear view of the two
choirs organized by Moses at the Red Sea? Perhaps the Therapeutae
themselves had merged the two traditions, just as Philo throughout
his work had tried to reconcile Platonic thought and Old Testament
authority.
In his comprehensive study of Philo, Harry Austryn Wolfson
shows that the philosopher conceived of three definite laws of nature:
the law of opposites which states that all things in the world are
divided into two equal though opposite parts; the law of the harmony
of opposites which establishes an equilibrium; and the law of the
perpetuity of the species which wills that nature should run a course
that brings it back to its starting point.3 Musicians sensitized to the
3
332 ff.
129
THE
JOURNAL
OF MUSICOLOGY
130