Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
GHH-final-pages.indd 1
12/29/14 2:32 PM
The greatest crop breeders the world has ever known were unquestionably the pre-European-invasion Native Americans. While our Old
World ancestors took wild grass and made bigger grass (wheat, rye, oats,
barley, rice), our New World ancestors took a wild grass called teosinte
and transformed it into maize. One ear of maize contains not double, or
triple, the amount of food in a seed head of teosintebut closer to 50
times the amount. Indeed, maize is so vastly more productive than any
wild grass, and so different in its fruit, the corncob, that until 2004 and
easier DNA analysis3 many top scientists argued it could not possibly have
been derived from teosinte. Genetic fingerprinting proved it was, and that
it had been bred, selected, and created by pre-Columbian Native Americans. Those peoples also gave us potatoes, pumpkins, squash, all beans but
soy and fava, turkeys, tomatoes, peppers, amaranth, quinoa, and more.
They did it as villages, and it wasnt just the medicine men who were
interested in the crops: Entire villages harvested and selected; found the
best every year, and carefully planted it the next; and cheered the changes
and improvements.
By contrast, modern expertsgovernment projects, corporations,
entrepreneursdo not create truly new crops. They have made considerable
and important incremental improvements in the crops and farm systems that
our ancestors gave us. In no case, however, have modern experts duplicated
the astonishing achievements of the original common people.
Do you think the various governments, non-governmental agencies,
and philanthropists of the world will address the looming food crisis effectively? Its not a matter of whether they can; the power and resources
probably exist. But will they?
I dont see much chance of that happening. Over the course of writing
this book, Ive seen my estimate of any such chance drop several percentage points. Thats why Im working with neohybrid hazelnut production,
and why Ive written this book.
Neohybrid hazelnuts are a genuinely new kind of crop requiring an
entirely new kind of growing system. Our ancestors could not have adopted
this path, but we have tools and knowledge they did not. This can be a successful new food and commodity. But it cannot be developed by a university.
It cannot be grown by governments. It will take common folks, following
their own pathsand working together. Farmers and the common people
used to thinkand actfor themselves. We need to start doing that again.
GHH-final-pages.indd 2
12/29/14 2:32 PM
GHH-final-pages.indd 3
12/29/14 2:32 PM
was so steep that logging it couldnt be done casually. And because of that
discouragingly steep slope, the native plant community was mostly intact.
There were enough big sugar maples that we could make maple syrup and
sell it. We did, which is how I made the acquaintance of Helen and Scott
Nearing. (The Maple Sugar Book is the best education I know of on the
history of maple sugarand everything else, for that matter.)
We also found beautiful native orchids. Shooting star, rare out in
prairie but sometimes found under limestone cliffs. It was quite natural,
and pure fun, to make a list of the native plants on our land. But there
were some things missing, including hazels. I looked hard, but there were
no hazels. It wasnt hard to guess why some species were missing. We had
rented out the 90-some tillable acres to a regular farmer neighbor. The
rent money paid the taxes on the farm as well as a good chunk of the
contract for deed every year. We discovered that our back hill (mostly in
contours of corn and hay then) didnt have the topsoil on it that it should
have, according to the USDA soil survey maps (dating from the 1950s)
wed looked at before buying the place. The map said the back hill had
between 12 and 18 inches of black topsoil covering it. But in 1976-ish, a
full foot of that black topsoil was gone. At best, the land had 0 to 6 inches
left. Most of the hill now looks pale brown if plowedthe color of subsoil.
We were horrified. I knew what this meant. Agriculture was changing
this land into desert at tremendous speed. This incredibly rich farmland,
which should feed us all foreversome of the best in the worldwas
being utterly destroyed. And this was not some random faraway global
problem; this was right here. My problem. So I thought: Im sitting here
with this fancy education aimed right at this problem. I need to use it. If
nobody ever starts working on it, it will certainly never get better. Its a bad
habit of mine; if theres a problem right in front of me that I have the
ability to attack, then I feel its my responsibility to attack it. (Thats also
how The American Chestnut Foundation came to exist: luckily for all,
Charles Burnham shared my responsibility quirk.)
My neighborsfor hundreds of miles aroundwere farmers. They
needed crops they could grow that wouldnt wreck the land and that
would allow them to support their families. So I began to wonder: What
used to grow here, before the plow? I once saw a map of Minnesotas
original vegetation, based at least partly on the plants used by the original
land surveyors as monument trees for property lines and corners. Known
as the Marschner Map for the man who spent untold hours putting it
together, it now exists in multiple versions, each one carefully bringing
the correct names of the different vegetation types up to date, so they
differ tremendously from one to the next. The version I first saw said most
of the land around my farm, and widely common across the region, was
oak-hazel savannah. All the newer versions mention the hazels too.
4
GHH-final-pages.indd 4
12/29/14 2:32 PM
H a z e l s , H y b ri d H a z e l s , an d N e o h y b ri d H a z e l s
GHH-final-pages.indd 5
12/29/14 2:32 PM
GHH-final-pages.indd 6
12/29/14 2:32 PM
H a z e l s , H y b ri d H a z e l s , an d N e o h y b ri d H a z e l s
FIGURE 1-2. The line of hazels behind Philip are all half sibs from one female parent. All the same age (about seven
years old); the difference in the one outstandingly tall bush is apparent. There may be multiple explanations for this.
One is that the tall bush bears very few nuts. In our experience, the most robust bushes bear the fewest nuts.
perhaps, or more spread out. Old wood usually bears less and less over
time. In apple, grape, and older hazel fields, this is addressed by pruning.
Every plant is pruned every year, for grapes and traditional hazels; at least
every other year for apples.
Rather than incessant pruning, which requires skilled labor, neohybrid hazels are selected for one of the outstanding features of hazels
wild ancestors: When you cut them down entirelyor burn them to the
ground in a wildfirethey grow back very strongly with fresh, new shoots.
The North American Midwest oak savanna is found everywhere along the
transitions from eastern deciduous forest to prairies, from Mississippi
to northern Minnesota. In Missouri and moving north, hazel becomes
increasingly common; the land from mid-Illinois and Iowa northward has
often been designated oak-hazel savanna. These are fire-based biomes;
without frequent fire, they become forest. The American hazels that live
there must be able to withstand having their tops burned off at any time
of year, because prairie fires can be started by lightning or by humans who
need to drive game.
Humans have harvested European hazel for fuel and building materials for tens of thousands of years by a method called coppicing, which
7
GHH-final-pages.indd 7
12/29/14 2:32 PM
GHH-final-pages.indd 8
12/29/14 2:32 PM
H a z e l s , H y b ri d H a z e l s , an d N e o h y b ri d H a z e l s
GHH-final-pages.indd 9
12/29/14 2:32 PM