Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Electrical Engineering
and Computer Science
58/1 (2014) 2327
doi: 10.3311/PPee.6993
Abstract
When the spans of an overhead line are large (for instance
over 400 metres) the conductor curve cannot be considered as a
parabola, since in that case the difference in comparison to the
catenary cannot be neglected. At such times the exact calculation has to be applied, i.e. the conductor curve has to be considered as a catenary (hyperbolic cosine). The catenary based calculation does not have limitations, it can be used for small and
large spans as well, but in comparison to the parabola method
it is significantly more complicated. This article shows the way
of derivation of new equations for the conductor and sag curves
based on a known catenary constant, which refers to the chosen conductor type, span length, tension and temperature of the
overhead line. The shown formulas ensure exact computing of
the conductor height and sag at any point of the span, avoiding errors generated by the approximation of the catenary by a
parabola.
1 Introduction
The catenary based calculation is generally used for high voltage overhead line (OHL) design, but in case of a medium or low
voltage network it is rarely done. A typical high voltage OHL is
shown in Figure 1.
Keywords
overhead lines catenary sag conductor curve inclined
span levelled span
Alen Hatibovic
The existing professional literatures give a complete procedure for solving the equation of state and determination of the
catenary constant [2]. However, a coordinate system which has
an origin set at the vertex point of the conductor curve is generally in use, so the distance toward the left-hand or right-hand
side support of the span is measured from the vertex, in both directions with a positive sign [7]. This method is mathematically
not optimal for OHL design. For that reason this article uses a
new coordinate system with an origin set on the line of the lefthand side support, on the elevation of the bottom of the lowerstanding support of the span. This way, the y-coordinate of the
conductor curve presents the conductor height related to the xaxis, but its x-coordinate presents a horizontal distance from the
2014 58 1
23
x
c, x (, )
(2)
c
In order to present the conductor curve in a mathematically
convenient coordinate system for OHL design, the catenary
curve y2 has to be appropriately replaced both horizontally and
vertically [6], as it is shown in Figure 3 . The inclined span
has been deliberately chosen instead of the levelled one, so the
developed algorithm will be universal.
The following symbols are used in Figure 3:
A(0; h1 ) left-hand side suspension point
B(S ; h2 ) right-hand side suspension point
y(x) =
x x MIN
+ y MIN ,
2c
xx MIN
c xxMIN
e c + e c
c + y MIN ,
2
x [0, S ]
x [0, S ]
(4)
(5)
All three equations are universal, i.e. they can be applied for
inclined and levelled spans as well, but for a concrete usage the
vertex point, i.e. the lowest point of the curve has to be determined previously. In comparison to the parabolic (quadratic)
equation for the conductor curve there is a significant difference,
since it can be defined even without knowing the vertex point of
the conductor curve [4].
2 Determination of the vertex point
The coordinates of the catenarys vertex point can be determined on the basis of the following input data: S , h1 , h2 , c. By
points A and B two equations in two unknowns can be written,
then the first equation has to be subtracted from the second one.
24
x MIN
c + y MIN
c
S x MIN
h2 = c ch
c + y MIN
c
S x
x MIN
MIN
h2 h1 = c ch
ch
c
c
h1 = c ch
(6)
(7)
(8)
Alen Hatibovic
By the help of the identity (9) [8, 10] x MIN can be defined as
(11).
x+y
xy
sh
2
2
S 2x MIN
S
h2 h1 = 2c sh
sh
2c
2c
h2 h1
S
x MIN = c arsh
2
2c sh(S /2c)
ch(x) ch(y) = 2 sh
(9)
(10)
(11)
arsh
y MIN = h1 2c sh
2 2c
2c sh(S /2c)
(12)
(13)
(14)
Since the x MIN and y MIN are determined, the basic equation
(4) for the conductor curve can be completed to (15), but the final catenary equation is given by the expression (16). The actual
interval is [0, S ].
y(x) = 2c sh2
x x MIN
x MIN
+ h1 2c sh2
, x [0, S ] (15)
2c
2c
(
y(x) = 2c sh
(
2 1
sh
2
2
"
#)
1
S
h2 h1
x + c arsh
2c
2
2c sh(S /2c)
"
#)!
S
h2 h1
arsh
+ h1 ,
2c
2c sh(S /2c)
x [0, S ]
yline =
(17)
x [0, S ]
(18)
(16)
x [0, S ]
D(x) =
h2 h1
x + h1
S
x x MIN
c ch
+ c y MIN ,
c
x [0, S ]
(19)
The sag curve is shown in Figure 4. Differently to the conductor curve it has a maximum point.
3.2 Location of the maximal sag
Finding the first derivative of (19) and then solving the equation (21), the maximal sag location (xc ) within the span is obtained, then given by (24).
d D(x) h2 h1
x x MIN
=
sh
dx
S
c
d D(x)
= 0 xc
dx
h2 h1
xc x MIN
sh
=0
S
c
h2 h1
xc = x MIN + c arsh
S
"
#
S
h2 h1
h2 h1
xc = + c arsh
arsh
2
S
2c sh(S /2c)
2014 58 1
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
25
if
h1 < h2
q>0
(26)
x2 > x1
(29)
Dmax =
x>0
sh2
"
#
h2 h1 S
h2 h1
h2 h1
arsh
+ arsh
2S
2c
2c sh(S /2c)
S
!
( "
#)!
h2 h1
1
h2 h1
1
S
+ sh2
arsh
arsh
2
S
2 2c
2c sh(S /2c)
(37)
(38)
The previous expression is a formula for calculating the maximal sag of the catenary conductor curve in an inclined span.
Similarly, formulas (39) and (40) for the other characteristic sags
can be defined by the use of the basic sag equation (19).
Mid-span sag:
(30)
D(S /2) =
(31)
(32)
x < sh(x)
h2 h1
xc x MIN
xc + h1 c ch
+ c y MIN
S
c
Dmax = 2c
#
"
h2 h1
h2 h1
1
2c sh2 arsh
2
2
2c sh(S /2c)
#)!
( "
1 S
h2 h1
sh2
arsh
2 2c
2c sh(S /2c)
(39)
(36)
"
#
h2 h1 S
h2 h1
D(x MIN ) = 2c
arsh
+
2S
2c
2c sh(S /2c)
(
)!!
1
h2 h1
S
sh2
arsh
,
2 2c
2c sh(S /2c)
(33)
0 x MIN S
(40)
4 Levelled spans
if
h1 > h2
q<0
(34)
if
h1 = h2
q=0
(35)
26
In a levelled span the suspension points are on the same elevation (h1 = h2 = h). Actually, it is a simplification of an inclined
span. In this special case the equations for the conductor curve
(41), (42), (43) are simpler than the adequate ones in an inclined
span, since the lowest point (44) of the conductor is located at a
mid-span.
Alen Hatibovic
x S /2
S
+ h,
ch
c
2c
!
x S /2
S
y(x) = 2c sh2
sh2
+ h,
2c
4c
!
y(x) = c ch
y(x) =
x [0, S ]
(41)
x [0, S ]
(42)
"
#
S
xS /2 2
S 2
c xS /2
e 2c e 2c
e 4c e 4c
+ h,
2
x [0, S ]
(43)
S
MIN ; h 2c sh2
2
4c
S
(44)
x [0, S ]
(45)
x [0, S ]
(46)
xS /2
#
xS /2 2
S 2
c S
D(x) = e 4c e 4c e 2c e 2c
, x [0, S ] (47)
2
Dmax = D(S /2) = D(x MIN ) = 2c sh2
S
4c
(48)
5 Future work
maximal sag, mid-span sag and low point sag. On the basis
of the presented catenary sag formulas the last three sags are
different in an inclined span, but they are all equal in a levelled
span.
The following very important feature of the catenary is identified: the sag function of its curve replaced from interval [0, S ]
to [S /2, S /2] is an even function in case of a levelled span, but
in an inclined span it is neither an even nor odd function. Comparing it to the parabola this is another special difference, since
the adequate feature of the latter function says [5]: the parabolic
(quadratic) sag function of its curve replaced from interval [0, S ]
to [S /2, S /2] is an even function both in case of levelled and
inclined spans.
References
1 Sag-Tension Calculation Methods for Overhead Lines, CIGR Technical
Brochure No. 324, (2007). CIGR WG B2-12.
2 Douglass DA, Thrash R, Sag and Tension of Conductor, Taylor & Fransis
Group LLC., 2006.
3 Hatibovic A, Determination of the Lowest Point of the Conductor in Inclined Spans Based on a Known Maximal Sag of the Parabola, CIRED
22nd International Conference on Electricity Distribution, (2013), 14, DOI
10.1049/cp.2013.0583.
4 Hatibovic A, Integral Calculus Usage for Conductor Length Determination
on the Basis of Known Maximal Sag of a Parabola, Periodica Polytechnica
Electrical Engineering, 56(2), (2012), DOI 10.3311/PPee.7076.
5 Hatibovic A, Parabolic Equation for Conductor Sag in Levelled and Inclined
Spans, 13th International Conference on Energetics-Electrical Engineering,
(2012), 8489.
6 Larson R, Hosteler R, Edwards BH, Essential Calculus Early Transcendental Functions, Houghton Mifflin Company, 2008.
7 Rashid MH, Power Electronics Handbook, Elsevier, 2011.
8 Weir MD, Hass J, Thomas Calculus, Pearson, 2010.
9 http://adattar.vmmi.org/konyvek/220/03_halmazok,_relaciok,
_fuggvenyek.pdf.
10 http://perso.univ-rennes1.fr/maximilian.bauer/AN1/
fonctions_hyperboliques.pdf.
6 Conclusions
Beside the determination of the new equations for the conductor and sag curves some characteristic differences between
the catenary and parabola have been revealed. Pre-eminently it
should be mentioned that the method referring to defining the
equation for the conductor curve significantly differs in the case
of parabolic and catenary approach. While for the catenary the
coordinates of the vertex point are necessary initial data, for
parabola they are not.
It has been shown that by the use of the new catenary equation
the direction of the catenarys maximal sag movement from the
mid-span can be determined with symbolic computation.
By the help of the basic sag equation provided in the article
for sag calculation at an arbitrary point of a span, the special
sag formulas are obtained for computing of characteristic sags:
Equations for Conductor and Sag Curves of an Overhead Line
2014 58 1
27