Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1.
Implementation of UFR load shedding based on average load as per CERC order
in Petition No. 263/MP/2012 on 19.12.13
As per para no 13 of CERC order in Petition No. 263/MP/2012 on 19.12.13:
Quote
We have heard the parties and perused the pleadings. We are in agreement with the
petitioner that there is a need to review and estimate the actual load on the feeders and
the constituents should consider average load in the feeders for computation of target
relief on identified feeders. As sufficient load relief has not been achieved, the
respondents are directed to identify more feeders for installation of UFR and df/dt
relays and submit the details to SRPC.
Unquote
At present, UFR load shedding based on maximum load is implemented in NER. When
UFR based load shedding are required, load of identified feeders are not generally at peak
load. As such sufficient load relief will not be achieved for system requirement. NER
beneficiaries are accordingly requested to compute average load of identified feeders
where UFRs are installed and to identify additional feeders for installation of UFRs to
fulfil the target based upon average load.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Furnishing request of shut down of the element, which was approved by NERPC,
by Indenting Agency(ISTS licensees/STUs/Generating Companies) to NERLDC
Planned shutdown approved by NERPC shall be considered for implementation by
NERLDC on D-3 basis. If an outage is to be availed on say 10 th of the month, the
shutdown availing agency would reconfirmed to NERLDC on 7th of the month by 1000
Hr. This practice is necessary to ensure optimal capacity utilisation and the time required
for associated system study/coordination by/amongst RLDC/NLDC.
8.
9.
10.
11.
The following figures taken from minutes of 99 th OCCM and *2014-15 LGBR of
NER. These figures to be reviewed.
A. Peak Demand in MW
SN.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
State
Ar. Pradesh
Assam
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Tripura
NER
Sep14
Oct14
Nov14
Dec14
139
136
125
125
1350
1380
1435
1450
135
140
135
135
310
86
335
87
350
90
345
80
100
140
120
125
260
310
270
250
2380
2528
2525
2460
*Jan15
B. Peak Availability in MW
SN.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
12.
State
Ar. Pradesh
Assam
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Tripura
NER
Sep14
Oct14
Nov14
Dec14
101
130
120
118
1045
122
993
874
867
134
115
118
401
91
95
415
91
290
80
276
79
86
75
75
300
295
285
281
2155
2145
1839
1814
*Jan15
These data required for preparation of various reports & computation of TTC-ATC of
NER-ER Corridor.
The following figures taken from minutes of 998th OCCM and *2014-15 LGBR of
NER. These figures to be reviewed.
A. Off Peak Demand in MW (0800 Hr)
SN.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
State
Ar. Pradesh
Assam
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Tripura
NER
Sep14
Oct14
Nov14
Dec14
77
868
81
202
57
72
175
1460
75
856
84
201
57
84
202
1485
69
890
81
210
59
72
176
1555
69
899
81
207
52
75
163
1470
Nov14
115
831
104
276
76
70
279
1751
Dec14
114
835
105
264
76
71
274
1740
*Jan15
State
Ar. Pradesh
Assam
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Tripura
NER
Sep14
121
903
114
437
89
83
284
1955
Oct14
121
914
114
390
84
78
284
1910
*Jan15
These data required for preparation of various reports & computation of TTC-ATC of
NER-ER Corridor.
13.
Name of State
Ar. Pradesh
Assam
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Tripura
NER
Sep14
70
825
65
145
36
60
120
1321
Oct14
70
790
65
170
43
65
120
1323
Nov14
65
660
65
175
43
55
110
1173
Dec14
65
680
65
175
40
55
120
1201
*Jan15
Sep14
Oct14
Nov14
Dec14
*Jan15
69
583
78
268
50
56
148
1252
58
534
72
231
46
52
147
1130
47
461
64
158
39
38
134
941
43
454
59
148
36
34
138
914
Availability in MU:
SN.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Name of State
Ar. Pradesh
Assam
Manipur
Meghalaya
Mizoram
Nagaland
Tripura
NER
These data required for preparation of various reports & computation of TTC-ATC of
NER-ER Corridor