Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Background background
The question of whether children should wear a uniform to school always makes for a lively
debate, and not only among students! In some countries school uniform is normal and most
schools make their students wear one.
Britain is the most obvious example of this, but in many other countries with strong links to
Britain uniform often has to be worn to school - examples include Australia, Ireland, New
Zealand, Singapore, Hong Kong, South Africa and many other African countries. Uniform is
also required at almost all schools in Japan. In other countries, particularly in continental Europe,
the USA and Canada, uniform is very rare in state-funded schools, although private schools may
have one. Debates about school uniform have been going on for decades in different countries
and districts, but during the 1990s state schools in the USA began to adopt uniforms. At first
uniform rules were seen as a way of stopping children dressing in gang colours in troubled urban
areas. Later, claims that introducing uniform leads to better discipline and educational results
encouraged other school districts and schools to make a change. Both the Clinton and Bush
administrations have been in favour of school uniforms. Other countries have picked up on this
trend - for example, there has been talk of making German children wear uniforms. This topic
looks at a very large number of arguments about uniforms. Not all of these will apply in every
country or school, so take care only to select the ones that are relevant for your debate. The
proposition (affirmative or government) side here is arguing for uniforms to be scrapped, but the
case could easily be reversed if your debate is about introducing uniforms instead.
[Edit]
[
]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[Edit]
Yes
No
Uniform is a social leveller - it makes all the
children at a school equal no matter what their
family background or income. If students can
choose their own clothes, then the rich kids
compete to show off their expensive designer
labels and costly sneakers (trainers). Children
from poorer families get picked on for not
being able to afford lots of pricey outfits.
Schools in the USA have used uniform to
overcome the problem of students wearing
gang colours if they were allowed to choose
their own clothes. Clothes with particular
colours or symbols marked rival groups of
students out as linked to street gangs. This
often led to fighting inside and outside the
classroom. If everyone has to wear the same
clothes to school, this problem is removed.
[Edit]
[
]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[Edit]
No
Yes
[Edit]
[
]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[Edit]
Yes
No
[Edit]
[
]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
Yes
[Edit]
[
]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
No
[ ]
[Edit]
Yes
[Edit]
[
]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[Edit]
Yes
No
[Edit]
[
]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[Edit]
Yes
No
[Edit]
[
]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[Edit]
Yes
Schools waste a lot of time trying to enforce
uniform rules. Because children dont like
wearing uniform, they fight against it in many
clever ways (e.g. shortening skirts, wearing
non-regulation shoes and hosiery, tying their
ties in funny ways, etc.). Schools in the US
often allow parents an opt-out from uniform,
which means teachers have to check what list a
child is on at the start of every lesson.
[ ]
[Edit]
No
Students will always kick against the system,
whatever that is. If there is a dress code instead
of a uniform, they will try to bend those rules
instead. For example, how short a skirt is too
short? Are crop-tops allowed? What about hats
or hoods which hide the students face? Most
problems of enforcing uniform rules in the
USA are because uniform is voluntary, or
students are allowed an opt-out from it. If
uniform must be worn by everyone there is
much less confusion and enforcing the rules is
quicker and simpler.
[Edit]
[
]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[Edit]
Yes
No
[Edit]
[
]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[Edit]
Yes
No