Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
BOOKLET
CA VINOD KUMAR MAVILLA
Nil;
where the total income exceeds Rs. 2,50,000 but 10% of the amount by which the total income
does not exceed Rs. 5,00,000
exceeds Rs. 2,50,000
where the total income exceeds Rs.5,00,000 but Rs.25,000 plus 20% of the amount by which the
does not exceed Rs.10,00,000
total income exceeds Rs.5,00,000;
where the total income exceeds Rs.10,00,000
Amendment
For senior citizens (being resident individuals of the age of 60 years or more but
less than 80 years)
where the total income does not exceed Rs.
Nil;Year
Financial
3,00,000
where the total income exceeds Rs.3,00,000 but
does not exceed Rs.5,00,000
Amendment
For resident individuals of the age of 80 years or more at any time during the
previous year
No Amendment
where the total income does not exceed Rs.
5,00,000
Nil;
Financial
Year
where the total income exceeds Rs.5,00,000
but 20%
of the amount by which the total income
does not exceed Rs.10,00,000
exceeds Rs.5,00,000;
where the total income exceeds Rs.10,00,000
01
Income Tax
(2) Firm/LLP
02
No Amendment
30%
No Amendment
30%
No Amendment
(5) Company
No Amendment
BEFORE AMENDMENT
AFTER AMENDMENT
Reason: Taking into consideration the appreciation in the value of house property and the
increased cost of finance
Income Tax
03
Answer
Mr. Rajesh purchased a residential house property for self-occupation at a cost of Rs.30 lakh
on 1.6.2013, in respect of which he took a housing loan of Rs.24 lakh from Punjab National
Bank@11% p.a. on the same date. Compute the eligible deduction in respect of interest on
housing loan for A.Y.2014-15 and A.Y.2015-16 under the provisions of the Income-tax Act,
1961, assuming that the entire loan was outstanding as on 31.3.2015 and he does not own
any other house property.
Particulars
Rs.
For A.Y.2014-15
(i)
(ii)
1,50,000
70,000
For A.Y.2015-16
(I)
2,00,000
(ii)
30,000
Note - In this case, Mr. Rajesh is entitled to deduction under section 80EE, in addition to
deduction under section 24(b) since
(1) the loan is sanctioned by Bank of India, being a financial institution, during the period
between 1.4.2013 and 31.3.2014;
(2) the loan amount sanctioned is less than Rs. 25 lakh;
(3) the value of the house property is less than Rs. 40 lakh;
(4) he does not own any other residential house property.
In the case of a
domestic company
AFTER
AMENDMENT
Income Tax
04
REASON
CLARIFICATION
Compute the admissible deduction under section 32AC for A.Y.2014-15 & A.Y.2015-16 in
each of the following cases Manufacturing company
A Ltd.
B Ltd.
C Ltd.
D Ltd.
E Ltd.
F Ltd.
G Ltd.
Answer
Manufacturing
company
80
70
60
75
105
70
70
P.Y.2013-14
A Ltd.
B Ltd.
C Ltd.
D Ltd.
E Ltd.
F Ltd.
G Ltd.
P.Y.2014-15
80
70
60
75
105
70
70
P.Y.2014-15
22
25
30
25
15
30
40
22
25
30
25
15
30
40
A.Y.2014-15
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
15.75
Nil
Nil
Under
subsection
A.Y.2015-16
15.30
Nil
4.5
Nil
2.25
4.5
16.5
(1)
(1A)
(1)
(1A)
(1)
Income Tax
05
AFTER
AMENDMENT
REASON
3. Capital asset in respect of which deduction under section 35AD has been
claimed to be used for specified business for a period of eight years
BEFORE
AMENDMENT
Under section 35AD, the time period for which capital assets
on which deduction has been claimed and allowed, have to be used for
the specified business, has not been specifically provided.
AFTER
AMENDMENT
Income Tax
REASON
06
ABC Ltd. is a company having two units Unit A carries on specified business of setting up
and operating a warehousing facility for storage of sugar; Unit B carries on nonspecified
business of operating a warehousing facility for storage of edible oil. Unit A commenced
operations on 1.4.2013 and it claimed deduction of Rs.100 lacs incurred on purchase of two
buildings for Rs.50 lacs each (for operating a warehousing facility for storage of sugar) under
section 35AD for A.Y.2014-15. However, in February, 2015, Unit A transferred one of its
buildings to Unit B.
Examine the tax implications of such transfer in the hands of ABC Ltd.
Answer
Since the capital asset, in respect of which deduction of Rs.50 lacs was claimed under section
35AD, has been transferred by Unit A carrying on specified business to Unit B carrying on nonspecified business in the P.Y.2014-15, the deeming provision under section 35AD(7B) is
attracted during the A.Y.2015-16.
Particulars
Rs.
50,00,000
5,00,000
45,00,000
4. Assessees claiming investment linked deduction under section 35AD not eligible
to claim exemption under section 10AA
BEFORE
AMENDMENT
AFTER
AMENDMENT
Income Tax
REASON
5.
07
BEFORE
AMENDMENT
AFTER
AMENDMENT
It has now been clarified that for the purposes of section 37(1),
any expenditure incurred by an assessee on the activities relating to
corporate social responsibility referred to in section 135 of the
Companies Act, 2013 shall not be deemed to have been incurred for
the purpose of business and hence, shall not be allowed as deduction
under section 37.
REASON
AFTER
AMENDMENT
REASON
Income Tax
08
AFTER
AMENDMENT
REASON
BEFORE
AMENDMENT
AFTER
AMENDMENT
REASON
XYZ Ltd. made the following payments in the month of March 2015 to residents without
deduction of tax at source. What would be the tax consequence for A.Y.2015-16, assuming
that the resident payees in all the cases mentioned below, have not paid the tax, if any, which
was required to be deducted by XYZ Ltd.?
Particulars
Rs.
1.
15,00,000
2.
70,000
3.
Directors remuneration
25,000
Income Tax
09
Would your answer change if XYZ Ltd. has deducted tax on the above in April, 2015 from
subsequent payments made to these persons and remitted the same in July, 2015?
Answer
Non-deduction of tax at source on any payment on which tax is deductible as per the
provisions of Chapter XVII-B would attract disallowance under section 40(a)(ia). Therefore,
non-deduction of tax at source on salary payment on which tax is deductibleunder section 192
and non-compete fees and directors remuneration on which tax is deductible under section
194J, would attract disallowance@30% of sum paid under section 40(a)(ia). Therefore, the
amount to be disallowed under section 40(a)(ia) while computing business income for
A.Y.2015-16 is as follows
Particulars
Disallowance
u/s 40(a)(ia) @
30% of sum paid
1.
Salary
[tax is deductible under section 192]
2.
70,000
21,000
3.
25,000
7,500
15,00,000
4,50,000
4,78,500
If the tax is deducted and paid in the next year i.e., P.Y.2015-16, the amount of Rs. 4,78,500
would be allowed as deduction while computing the business income of A.Y.2016-17.
8. Uniform amount of presumptive income from each goods carriage, whether heavy
goods carriage or other than heavy goods carriage [Section 44AE]
BEFORE
AMENDMENT
Rs 5,000
Rs 4,500
AFTER
AMENDMENT
REASON
Income Tax
10
Mr. X commenced the business of operating goods vehicles on 1.4.2014. He purchased the
following vehicles during the P.Y.2014-15. Compute his income under section 44AE for
A.Y.2015-16.
Type of Vehicle
Number
Date of
purchase
1.
2
1
10.4.2014
15.3.2015
2.
3
1
16.7.2014
2.1.2015
3.
2
1
29.8.2014
23.2.2015
Would your answer change if the two light goods vehicles purchased in April, 2014 were put to
use only in July, 2014?
Answer
Since Mr. X does not own more than 10 vehicles at any time during the previous year 2014-15,
he is eligible to opt for presumptive taxation scheme under section 44AE. Rs. 7,500 per month
or part of month for which each goods carriage is owned by him would be deemed as his
profits and gains from such goods carriage.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Number of
Vehicles
Date of purchase
No. of months
No. of vehicles
[(1) (3)]
10.4.2014
12
24
15.3.2015
16.7.2014
27
2.1.2015
29.8.2014
16
23.2.2015
Total
73
10
Therefore, presumptive income of Mr. X under section 44AE for A.Y.2015-16 is Rs.5,47,500,
being 73 Rs. 7,500.
The answer would remain the same even if the two vehicles purchased in April, 2014 were put
to use only in July, 2014, since the presumptive income of Rs.7,500 per month has to be
calculated per month or part of the month for which the vehicle is owned by Mr. X.
Income Tax
11
Capital Gains
1. Income arising from transfer of security by a foreign portfolio investor (FPI)
characterized as capital gains [Section 2(14)]
BEFORE
AMENDMENT
AFTER
AMENDMENT
2.
2. Period of holding of units of debt oriented mutual fund and unlisted securities, to
qualify as a long-term capital asset, increased from more than 12 months to more
than 36 months [Section 2(42A)]
BEFORE
AMENDMENT
AFTER
AMENDMENT
REASON
AFTER
AMENDMENT
Income Tax
12
AFTER
AMENDMENT
AFTER AMENDMENT
REASON
1. There have been controversial judicial views interpreting a residential house to mean
more than one residential house on the reasoning that singular includes plural
under the General Clauses Act.
2. Further, another issue which emerged before the Courts was whether investment in a
residential house situated outside India would qualify for exemption under these
sections.
3. Since the real intent of law was to allow capital gains exemption for investment in one
residential house situated in India
Income Tax
13
7. Maximum investment in bonds of NHAI & RECL, out of capital gains arising from
transfer of one or more capital assets during a financial year, restricted to Rs50
lakhs, irrespective of whether the investment is made in the same financial year or
in the subsequent financial year or both [Section 54EC]
BEFORE AMENDMENT
AFTER AMENDMENT
REASON
The period available for investing in NHAI/RECL bonds is six months from the date of transfer,
and the restriction of Rs 50 lakh is in relation to a financial year, it was possible for assessees
transferring an asset or assets on or after 1st October in a financial year, to invest Rs 50 lakh in
the same financial year and Rs 50 lakh in the next financial year (within six months from the
date of transfer) and claim an exemption of upto Rs 1 crore under section 54EC. This was,
however, not in accordance with the real intent of law to restrict the maximum
exemption to Rs 50 lakh.
Notification of Cost Inflation Index for F.Y.2014-15 [Notification No. 31/2014 dated
11.06.2014] - 1024
Mr. Ram, working as a CEO with ABC Ltd., furnishes the following particulars of assets
transferred by him during the P.Y.2014-15
Type of Vehicle
Date of
transfer
Rs.
1.
13/1/2015
1,45,00,000
2.
14/2/2015
2,00,000
3.
14/2/2015
75,000
4.
14/2/2015
65,000
5.
14/2/2015
75,000
Income Tax
14
Mr. Ram made the following investments, out of the capital gains arising on sale of residential
house Particulars
Rs.
1.
35,00,000
2.
25,00,000
3.
40,00,000
4.
30,00,000
Answer
Compute the total income and tax liability of Mr. Ram for A.Y.2015-16, if his salary income
(computed) is Rs. 24 lakh and interest on fixed deposits with banks is Rs.1 lakh. Assume that
he has contributed Rs.1,50,000 to PPF and paid medical insurance premium of Rs.12,000 to
insure his health.
Cost Inflation Index of F.Y.1999-2000: 389; F.Y.2009-10: 632; F.Y.2012-13: 852; F.Y.2014-15:
1024.
Computation of total income of Mr. Ram for A.Y.2015-16
Particulars
Rs.
Salaries
24,00,000
19,52,800
1,00,000
44,52,800
1,50,000
12,000
Total Income
1,62,000
42,90,800
Rs.
3,85,560
5,33,900
9,19,460
27,584
9,47,044
Income Tax
15
Residential house
Gross Sale consideration
Less: Indexed cost of acquisition [15,56,000 1024/389]
Less: Exemption under section 54
Investment in one residential house (it is more beneficial
to claim exemption in respect of investment in residential
flat at Pune)
Investment in bonds of NHAI/RECL (aggregate
(2) &
(4)
(3)
(5)
Rs.
1,45,00,000
40,96,000
1,04,04,000
35,00,000
50,00,000
19,04,000
Nil
75,000
50,000
25,000
75,000
51,200
23,800
Rs.
19,27,800
25,000
19,52,800
Income Tax
16
AFTER
AMENDMENT
REASON
Mr. H has acquired a residential house property in Delhi on 1st April, 2001 for Rs.22,00,000
and decided to sell the same on 3rd May, 2004 to Mrs.P and an advance of Rs.70,000 was
taken from her. The balance money was not paid by Mrs. P and hence, Mr. H has forfeited the
entire advance sum. In April, 2014, he once again entered into negotiations for sale of the said
property to Mr.Y, and received Rs.2 lakh as advance, but the transfer did not materialize and
hence, the advance was forfeited. On 3rd March, 2015, he finally sold this house to Mr. S for
Rs.95,00,000. In the meantime, on 4th February, 2015, he had purchased a residential house
in Faridabad for Rs.28,00,000 and made full payment for the same. However, Mr.H does not
possess any legal title till 31st March, 2015, as such transfer was not registered with the
registration authority.
Mr.H had purchased another old house in Madurai on 14th October, 2014 from Mr. X, an Indian
resident, by paying Rs.25,00,000 and the purchase was registered with the appropriate
authority.
Determine the taxable capital gain arising from above transactions in the hands of Mr.H for
Assessment Year 2015-16.
Cost Inflation Index - 2001-02: 426; 2004-05: 480; 2013-14: 939; 2014-15:1024.
Income Tax
17
Answer
Rs.
95,00,000
51,20,000
43,80,000
28,00,000
15,80,000
Notes:
1. Computation of indexed cost of acquisition
Particulars
Cost of acquisition
Less: Advance taken in the previous year 2004-05 and forfeited __
Rs.
22,00,000
70,000
21,30,000
51,20,000
2. Advance of Rs.2 lakh taken by Mr. H in April, 2014, which was forfeited due to the
transaction not materializing, is taxable under section 56(2)(ix). Hence, such amount
would not be reduced to compute the indexed cost of acquisition while computing capital
gains on sale of the property in March, 2015.
3. In order to avail exemption of capital gains under section 54, one residential house should
be purchased within 1 year before or 2 years after the date of transfer or constructed
within a period of 3 years after the date of transfer. In this case, Mr.H has purchased the
residential house in Faridabad within one year before the date of transfer and paid the full
amount as per the purchase agreement, though he does not possess any legal title till
31.3.2015 since the transfer was not registered with the registration authority. However,
for the purpose of claiming exemption under section 54, holding of legal title is not
necessary. If the taxpayer pays the full consideration in terms of the purchase agreement
within the stipulated period, the exemption under section 54 would be available. It was so
held in Balraj v. CIT(2002) 254 ITR 22 (Del.) and CIT v. Shahzada Begum (1988) 173 ITR
397 (A.P.).
4. The Finance (No.2) Act, 2014 has clarified that exemption under section 54 can be availed
only in respect of one residential house. It would be more beneficial for Mr. H toclaim
exemption in respect of the Faridabad house since the cost of the same is higher than the
cost of the Madurai house.
Income Tax
18
AFTER AMENDMENT
REASON:
In order to channelize household savings, the limit of deduction allowed under
section 80C has been raised from Rs 1 lakh to Rs 1.50 lakh.
Answer
Mr. A, employed with ABC Ltd., has deposited Rs.1,20,000 in public provident fund. He has
paid life insurance premium of ` 15,000 on the policy taken on 1.5.2012 to insure his life (Sum
assured Rs. 1,20,000). He has deposited ` 30,000 in a five year term deposit with bank. He
has also contributed ` 1,20,000, being 10% of his salary, to the notified pension scheme of the
Central Government. A matching contribution was made by ABC Ltd. Compute the deduction
available to him under Chapter VI-A for A.Y.2015-16.
Deduction available to Mr. A under Chapter VI-A for A.Y.2015-16
Section
Particulars
Rs.
Rs.
80C
80CCE
Aggregate donations under section 80C and
80CCD(1), Rs. 2,50,000, but restricted to
80CCD(2) Employer contribution to notified pension scheme
Aggregate Deduction
1,50,000
1,00,000
2,50,000
1,50,000
1,20,000
2,70,000
Income Tax
19
AFTER AMENDMENT
REASON
Examine the applicability of the provisions for tax deduction at source under section 194DA in
the above cases (I) Mr.X, a resident, is due to receive Rs.4.50 lakhs on 31.3.2015, towards maturity proceeds
of LIC policy taken on 1.4.2012, for which the sum assured is Rs.4 lakhs and the annual
premium is Rs.1,25,000.
(ii) Mr.Y, a resident, is due to receive Rs.2.20 lakhs on 31.3.2015 on LIC policy taken on
1.4.2010, for which the sum assured is Rs.2 lakhs and the annual premium is Rs.35,000.
(iii) Mr.Z, a resident, is due to receive Rs.95,000 on 1.10.2014 towards maturity proceeds of
LIC policy taken on 1.10.2010 for which the sum assured is Rs.90,000 and the annual
premium was Rs.19,000.
Income Tax
20
Answer
(I)
Since the annual premium exceeds 10% of sum assured in respect of a policy taken on
1.4.2012, the maturity proceeds of Rs.4.50 lakhs are not exempt unde section 10(10D)
in the hands of Mr.X. Therefore, tax is required to be deducted@2% under section
194DA on the maturity proceeds of Rs.4.50 lakhs payable to Mr.X.
(ii) Since the annual premium is less than 20% of sum assured in respect of a policy taken
before 1.4.2012, the sum of Rs.2.20 lakhs due to Mr.Y would be exempt under section
10(10D) in his hands. Hence, no tax is required to be deducted at source under section
194DA on such sum payable to Mr.Y.
(iii) Even though the annual premium exceeds 20% of sum assured in respect of a policy
taken before 1.4.2012, and consequently, the maturity proceeds of Rs.95,000 would not
be exempt under section 10(10D) in the hands of Mr.Z, the tax deduction provisions
under section 194DA are not attracted since the maturity proceeds are less than Rs.1
lakh.
2. Enabling provision for deductor to file correction statement and for processing of
correction statement so filed [Sections 200 & 200A
BEFORE
AMENDMENT
AFTER
AMENDMENT
REASON
Income Tax
21
AFTER
AMENDMENT
Clause (i) of section 201(3) which provides time limit of two years
for passing order under section 201(1) for cases in which TDS statement
have been filed, has been omitted.
REASON
BEFORE AMENDMENT
AFTER AMENDMENT
RESONE
1. Notice under section 148 may be issued for reassessment up to six years from the end
of the relevant assessment year for which the income has escaped assessment.
2. Therefore, section 148 allows reopening of cases of one more preceding previous year
than specified under section 201(3)(ii).
3. On account of this difference in time limit, an order under section 201(1) cannot be
passed in respect of defaults relating to TDS which comes to the notice during
search/reassessment proceeding in respect of previous year which is not covered
under section 201(3)(ii) but covered under section 148.
4. Therefore, in order to align the time limit provided under section 201(3)(ii) and section
148, the time limit provided under section 201(3)(ii) for passing order under section
201(1) has been extended by one more year.
Income Tax
22
AFTER
AMENDMENT
Section 140 provides that the return under section 139 shall be signed
and verified in the manner specified therein for different categories of
persons.
AFTER
AMENDMENT
1. section 140 has been amended to provide that the return shall be
verified by the persons specified therein.
2. Consequently, the words sign and verify, wherever they have
been used in section 140, have been substituted by the word
verify.
3. Further, the words sign or signing, wherever they have been
used in section 140, have been replaced by verify or verifying.
REASON
Indirect Tax
Central Excise Duty
E-payment of excise duty mandatory for all assessees irrespective of the duty paid
during previous year
BEFORE AMENDMENT
AFTER AMENDMENT
where an assessee had paid an excise 1. Every assessee shall electronically pay the
duty of Rs 1 lakh or more including the
duty through internet banking.
amount paid by utilization of CENVAT 2. However, the Assistant/Deputy Commissioner
credit, in the preceding financial year, he
of Central Excise may for reasons to be
was required to deposit the excise duty
recorded in writing, allow the assessee to
liable to be paid by him electronically
deposit excise duty by any mode other than
through internet banking.
internet banking.
2. Importer issuing CENVATable invoices now required to obtain registration
BEFORE AMENDMENT
Not required to obtain
registration
AFTER AMENDMENT
An importer who issues an invoice on which
CENVAT credit can be taken is also required to obtain such
registration.
Thus, such importer will have to obtain registration
as a 'registered importer' with the central excise authorities
to pass on the credit on the imported goods.
Customs Duty
1.
Relevant date for determination of rate of duty and tariff valuation for imports
through a vehicle to be the date of arrival of vehicle where bill of entry is filed prior
to the arrival of the vehicle [Section 15(1)]
Particulars
Relevant date
BEFORE AMENDMENT
Goods entered for home
consumption under section
46
23
Indirect Tax
Particulars
24
Relevant date
AFTER AMENDMENT
Goods entered for home
consumption under section 46
2. Relevant date for determination of rate of duty and tariff valuation for imports
through a vehicle to be the date of arrival of vehicle where bill of entry is filed prior
to the arrival of the vehicle [Section 15(1)]
BEFORE AMENDMENT
AFTER AMENDMENT
3.
Bill of entry to be filed prior to the delivery of import report if the vehicle in which
the goods have been imported is expected to arrive within 30 days [Section 46(3)]
BEFORE AMENDMENT
AFTER AMENDMENT
Indirect Tax
25
SERVICE TAX
1.
Service tax to be levied on sale of space or time for advertisements in all media
except print media [Section 66D(g)]
BEFORE
AMENDMENT
AFTER
AMENDMENT
2.
BEFORE
AMENDMENT
AFTER
AMENDMENT
3.
BEFORE
AMENDMENT
AFTER
AMENDMENT
Indirect Tax
4.
26
Rate of exchange under section 67A to be determined as per GAAP [Section 67A]
BEFORE
AMENDMENT
AFTER
AMENDMENT
The new rule 11 lays down that the rate of exchange would be the
rate applicable as per the generally accepted accounting principles on the
date when point of taxation arises in terms of Point of Taxation Rules,
2011.
5.
BEFORE
AMENDMENT
AFTER
AMENDMENT
6.
Point of taxation under reverse charge to be the payment date or the first day
occurring immediately after three months from the date of invoice, whichever is
earlier
BEFORE
AMENDMENT
The first proviso to rule 7 laid down that if the payment is not made within 6
months of the date of invoice, point of taxation will be determined as if rule
7 does not exist.
AFTER
AMENDMENT
With reference to the position of service tax law as applicable on or after 01.10.2014, what
would be the point of taxation and due date of payment of service tax in each of the following
independent cases:
S. No.
Date of invoice
Date of payment
(i)
15.10.2014
10.11.2014
(ii)
20.10.2014
15.02.2015
Note: In both the above cases, service tax has been paid by the service recipient (a private
limited company) under section 68(2) of the Finance Act, 1994.
Indirect Tax
27
Answer
Rule 7 of Point of Taxation Rules, 2011 provides that point of taxation in respect of
persons required to pay tax as recipients of service in respect of services notified under section
68(2) of the Finance Act is the date of payment. However, with effect from 01.10.2014, first
proviso to rule 7 has been substituted to lay down that where the payment is not made within a
period of 3 months of the date of invoice, point of taxation will be the date immediately following
the said period of 3 months.
Further, in case of a corporate assessee, due date of e-payment of service tax payable
for a month is the 6th day of the month immediately following the said month. With effect from
01.10.2014, e-payment has been mandatory for all assessees. Thus, in the light of aforesaid
provisions, point of taxation and due dates in the following cases will be:
S.
No.
Date of
invoice
Date of payment
Point of
taxation
Due date of
payment
(i)
10.11.2014
06.12.2014
(ii)
20.01.2015
06.02.2015
7.
New exemptions
Indirect Tax
28
Exemptions rationalized
9.
BEFORE
AMENDMENT
AFTER
AMENDMENT
EFFECT
10. Concept of auxiliary education services done away with and exemption restricted
to only few specific services
BEFORE
AMENDMENT
AFTER
AMENDMENT
Indirect Tax
29
Exemptions withdrawn
1.
BEFORE
AMENDMENT
AFTER
AMENDMENT
Answer
With reference to the position of service tax law as applicable on or after 01.08.2014,
determine the applicability of service tax in each of the following independent cases:
(i) External asset management services received by Reserve Bank of India from overseas
financial institutions.
(ii) Service provided by an Indian tour operator to Mr. B, a Japanese National, for a tour
conducted in Europe.
(iii) Services provided to a Higher Secondary School affiliated to CBSE Board by an IT
company in relation to development of a software to be used for enhancing the quality of
classroom teaching.
(i)
Exempt. With effect from 11.07.2014, services received by Reserve Bank of India from
outside India in relation to management of foreign exchange reserves have been
exempted from service tax. External asset management services received by Reserve
Bank of India from overseas financial institutions is a specialized financial service in the
course of management of foreign exchange reserves [Mega Exemption Notification No.
25/2012 ST dated 20.06.2012 amended].
(ii) Exempt. With effect from 11.07.2014, services provided by an Indian tour operator to a
foreign tourist in relation to a tour wholly conducted outside India have been exempted
from service tax [Mega Exemption Notification No. 25/2012 ST dated 20.06.2012
amended].
(iii) Taxable. With effect from 11.07.2014, only the following specific services provided TO an
educational institution (which provides education covered under negative list of services)
have been exempted from service tax:
(i) transportation of students, faculty and staff;
(ii) catering, including any mid-day meals scheme sponsored by the Government;
(iii) security or cleaning or house-keeping services performed in such educational
institution;
Indirect Tax
30
(iv) Services relating to admission to, or conduct of examination by, such institution.
Services by way of education up to higher secondary or equivalent fall within the
purview of negative list of services. Thus, the education provided by the Higher
Secondary School is not liable to tax. However, the services of a development of
software provided to it are not covered under any of the specific services given
above. Thus, the same will be liable to service tax [Mega Exemption Notification
No. 25/2012 ST dated 20.06.2012 amended].
Abatement Notification amended
1. Only service providers need to satisfy the condition of non- availment of credit for
availing abatement in case of GTA service
BEFORE
AMENDMENT
AFTER
AMENDMENT
2.
BEFORE
AMENDMENT
AFTER
AMENDMENT
Indirect Tax
3.
31
BEFORE
AMENDMENT
AFTER
AMENDMENT
4.
BEFORE AMENDMENT
AFTER AMENDMENT
5.
BEFORE
AMENDMENT
CENVAT credit on inputs, capital goods and input services, used for
providing the taxable service, has not been taken under the provisions of
CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.
AFTER
AMENDMENT
Allow CENVAT credit on input service of another tour operator, which are
used for providing the taxable service.
6.
BEFORE
AMENDMENT
AFTER
AMENDMENT
7.
BEFORE
AMENDMENT
AFTER
AMENDMENT
Indirect Tax
8.
32
E-payment of service tax mandatory for all assessees irrespective of the tax paid
during previous year
BEFORE
AMENDMENT
AFTER
AMENDMENT
Every assessee shall electronically pay the service tax payable by him,
through internet banking. However, the jurisdictional Assistant / Deputy
Commissioner of Central Excise may for reasons to be recorded in writing,
allow the assessee to deposit service tax by any mode other than internet
banking.
9.
Service receiver and provider to pay equal service tax on non-abated value in case
of renting of motor vehicle
BEFORE
AMENDMENT
AFTER
AMENDMENT
Percentages of service tax payable by the service provider and the service
receiver from 60%:40% to 50% each.
Answer
XY Travels Pvt. Ltd., located in New Delhi, is engaged in providing services of renting of
motorcab and discharges its service tax liability by availing abatement granted under
Notification No. 26/2012 ST dated 20.06.2012. Value of services rendered by the company
during the month of October, 2014 is Rs.5,50,000 (before availing abatement).
The company has sub-contracted part of its services to YZ Cabs Pvt. Ltd., which is also
engaged in providing services of renting of motorcab. Total value of such sub-contracted
services is Rs.50,000 and service tax payable thereon is Rs.6,180.
Determine the net service tax liability of XY Travels Pvt. Ltd. (to be paid in cash) for the
month of October, 2014.
Computation of net service tax liability (to be paid in cash) of XY Travels Pvt. Ltd. for
October, 2014
Particulars
Rs.
Value of services
5,50,000
3,30,000
2,20,000
27,192
2,472
24,720
Indirect Tax
33
Notes
1. Notification No. 26/2012 ST grants abatement of 60% in respect of services of renting of
motorcab.
2. With effect from 01.10.2014, Notification No. 26/2012 ST has been amended to provide
that up to 40% CENVAT credit of input service of renting of a motorcab provided by a subcontractor to the main contractor (providing service of renting of motorcab) could be
availed by the main contractor if the sub-contractor is paying service tax on full value i.e.,
no abatement is being availed by sub-contractor. This credit will be available even if the
main contractor pays the service tax on abated value. Since YZ Cabs Pvt. Ltd. has paid
service tax on full value (Rs.50,000 x 12.36% = Rs. 6,180), XY Travels Pvt. Ltd. can avail
credit upto Rs.2,472 (40% of Rs. 6,180).
3. Since XY Travels Pvt. Ltd. is a company, reverse charge provisions will not apply in its
case. Further, provisions of partial reverse charge will not apply in case of YZ Cabs Pvt.
Ltd. also, as in its case services are provided in similar line of business.
With reference to the position of service tax law as applicable on or after 01.10.2014,
determine the net service tax liability to be paid in cash in each of the following independent
cases:
(I) Value of services provided by a radio taxi operator is Rs.1,00,000. The operator does not
avail CENVAT credit on inputs, capital goods and input services used for providing the
said service. It intends to avail abatement, if any, granted for such service.
(ii) Value of services provided by a Company running air-conditioned buses for point to point
travel is Rs.5,00,000. The buses do not stop to pick or drop the passengers
during the journey. The Company does not avail CENVAT credit on inputs, capital goods
and input services used for providing the said service. It intends to avail abatement, if
any, granted for such service. The Company has sub-contracted part of its services to
another Company running air-conditioned buses for point to point travel. Total value of
such sub-contracted services is Rs.50,000 and service tax payable thereon is ` 6,180.
(iii) Value of services provided by a Company running non air-conditioned buses for point to
point travel is Rs.1,00,000. The buses do not stop to pick or drop the passengers during
the journey. The Company does not avail CENVAT credit on inputs, capital goods and
input services used for providing the said service. It intends to avail abatement, if any,
granted for such service.
Answer
(I) With effect from 01.10.2014, clause (o) of section 66D has been amended by Finance
(No.) Act, 2014 to remove the service of transportation of passengers by radio taxis from
the ambit of negative list of services. Thus, travel by radio taxis or radio cabs, whether or
not air-conditioned, has been made liable to service tax w.e.f. 01.10.2014. However, an
abatement of 60% has been extended to transport of passengers by a radio taxi from the
same day by inserting a new entry 9A in Notification No. 26/2012 ST dated 20.06.2012.
The abatement would be available if CENVAT credit on inputs, capital goods and input
services, used for providing the taxable service, has not been taken under the provisions
of CENVAT Credit Rues, 2004. Thus, in the given case, since CENVAT credit on inputs,
capital goods and input services is not being availed by the radio taxi operator, he can
claim the abatement of 60% which will make the effective rate of service tax as 4.944% [40
x 12.36%]. Thus, service tax liability to be paid in cash will be ` 4,944 [` 1,00,000 x
4.944%]. In this case, entire service tax liability will have to be paid in cash as benefit of
CENVAT credit cannot be availed.
Indirect Tax
34
(ii) With effect from 11.07.2014, Mega Exemption Notification No. 25/2012 ST dated
20.06.2012 has been amended to restrict the exemption available to transport of
passengers by contract carriages for purposes other than tourism, conducted tour,
charter or hire to transport of passengers by non air-conditioned contract carriages only.
Thus, transport of passengers by air-conditioned contract carriages has been made liable
to service tax with effect from 11.07.2014. However, an abatement of 60% has been
extended to transport of passengers, with or without accompanied belongings, by a
contract carriage other than motorcab from the same day by inserting a new entry 9A in
Notification No. 26/2012 ST dated 20.06.2012. The aforesaid abatement would be
available if CENVAT credit on inputs, capital goods and input services, used for providing
the taxable service, has not been taken under the provisions of CENVAT Credit Rues,
2004.
In the given case, the buses are contract carriages since they are used for point to point
travel and they do not stop to pick or drop the passengers during the journey. Thus, the
passenger transportation services provided in air-conditioned buses (contract carriages)
by the Company would be liable to service tax. Further, since the Company does not avail
CENVAT credit on inputs, capital goods and input services, it can claim the abatement of
60% which will make the effective rate of service tax as 4.944% [40 x 12.36%]. Thus,
service tax liability to be paid in cash will be Rs.24,720 [Rs.5,00,000 x 4.944%].
It is to be noted that whereas credit of input service received by a person engaged in
providing services of renting of motorcab from a sub-contractor has been allowed with
effect from 01.10.2014 under entry 9 of Notification No. 26/2012 ST dated 20.06.2012, the
same is not allowed for contract carriages other than motorcab under entry 9A. Therefore,
entire service tax liability of Rs.24,720 will have to be paid in cash.
10. Slab rate of interest introduced for delayed payment of service tax
BEFORE
AMENDMENT
failure to pay service tax by the prescribed due date attracted simple
interest @ 18% p.a. for the period by which such crediting of tax or any part
thereof was delayed.
AFTER
AMENDMENT
prescribe slab rates of interest which would vary with the extent of delay.
The new rates of interest for delayed payment of service tax are as follows:
Extent of delay
Up to 6 months
18%
Indirect Tax
35
Determine the interest payable under section 75 of Finance Act, 1994 on delayed payment of
service tax from the following particulars:
Service tax payable
Rs.60,500
06.11.2014
Date of payment
06.01.2016
Answer
Note: Turnover of services in the preceding financial year was Rs.80 lakh.
Section 75 of Finance Act, 1994 levies simple interest on failure to pay service tax by the
prescribed due date for the period by which such crediting of tax or any part thereof is delayed.
With effect from 01.10.2014, Notification No. 12/2014 ST dated 11.07.2014 has been issued to
prescribe new slab rates of interest for delayed payment of service tax.
Therefore, the interest payable under section 75 will be computed as under:
Computation of interest payable under section 75
Particulars
Delay from 06.11.2014
- 05.05.2015
Interest (Rs.)
Total Interest
15,730
Since the turnover of the services in the preceding financial year is more than Rs.60 lakh
concession of 3% on applicable rate of interest cannot be availed.
CENVAT CREDIT
1. Credit on inputs and input services to be availed within 6 months of the date of
invoice.
2. Availability of Credit of Input Service in Reverse Charge
Full Reverse Charge
After payment of Service tax to the
Government
3. Condition of reversal of credit on failing to pay value of input service and service tax
within 3 months of the date of invoice not to apply in case of full reverse charge.
4. Credit reversed on account of non-receipt of export proceeds within the specified or
extended period can be re-availed if export proceeds are received within one year
from the specified or extended period [Rule 6(8)]