Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
INTRODUCTION
The uptake of L-arginine and other cationic amino
acids occurs through a family of membrane transporters
systems, which include at least 5 distinct groups in human1:
the Na+-independent systems (y+, y+L, b0+, b+) and the
Na+-dependent system including B0+.2 The y+ system is also
recognized as a family of cationic amino acid transporters
(CAT) with 5 members, whose transport activity maintain
the Na+ independence, they are sensitive to trans-stimulation, and its activity is altered by changes in the membrane
potencial.3,4 Likewise, system y+L comprises at least 2 distinct heteromeric amino acid transporters [the glycoprotein
4F2 heavy chain (4F2hc) combined with either amino acid
transporter (AT) carrier y+LAT1 or y+LAT2].3 In primary
cultures of differentiated human endothelium, it has been
demonstrated that L-arginine transport is mediated by
human CAT-1 (hCAT-1) and hCAT-2B,4 and system y+L
and B0+.5
Nitric oxide (NO) is an endothelial-derived vasodilator
molecule produced by the conversion of L-arginine into
L-citrulline via a family of nitric oxide synthases (NOS),
which include the Ca2+-calmodulindependent isoform present in endothelium (eNOS).6,7 Interestingly, in several cell
types, L-arginine transport has been considered to be a ratelimiting factor for NO synthesis.5,8,9 Thus, in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), a mature model of
endothelial cells, the eNOS activity is coupled to the L-arginine transport through hCAT-1 or hCAT-2B5 and the y+L5
system; results that were replicated also in porcine pulmonary artery endothelial cells (PAEC)10 and in endothelial
cells from human placental microvessels11 and human
saphenous veins.12 Therefore, L-arginine uptake via CATs
and y+L is required for NO synthesis in differentiated endothelial cells.
Human endothelial progenitor cells (hEPC) derived
from bone marrow are involved in vascular repair13,14
through the homing into sites of vascular injury, where they
elicit angiogenic, prosurvival, and anti-inammatory effects
and through their differentiation in mature endothelium.
Others and we have previously described that hEPC
undergo differentiation in culture. For example, on the third
day (hEPC-3d), hEPC are positive for CD34, CD133, and
Oct4 markers, which represents an immature phenotype,
whereas at day 14 (hEPC-14d), hEPC lose the expression
of those surface molecules and express membrane markers
of mature endothelium, such as vascular endothelial growth
www.jcvp.org |
439
Daz-Prez et al
factor receptor 2.15,16 Accordingly, hEPC exhibited a differential expression and activity of the equilibrative and concentrative nucleoside transporters15 showing that the cell
differentiation affects the expression and function of membrane-associated transporters. Moreover, it has been
described that NO and eNOS participates in the neovascularization process via mobilization of progenitor cells from
brown marrow stem cell niches to the peripheral circulation.17 Interestingly, eNOS activity has been described in
progenitor endothelial cells,18,19 and eNOS expression is
required for mobilizing EPC from bone marrow toward
the circulation.20 Due to the dependence of L-arginine transport for NO synthesis in differentiate endothelium, we wonder whether this mechanism is present in hEPC. Therefore,
we aimed to characterize the L-arginine transport and NO
synthesis in hEPC during 2 stages of differentiation (3 and
14 days of culture).
METHODS
Isolation and Culture of hEPC
hEPC were isolated as described previously.15,16,21
Briey, fresh human peripheral venous blood was collected
from eight healthy female volunteers (25-30 y), non-smokers,
not receiving any medication and without any clinical diagnosis. This protocol was conducted according to the protocols
dened by the Declaration of Helsinki Ethic Committee, and
informed consent was signed by every volunteer participating
in this study. The total peripheral blood mononuclear cells
fraction was isolated by gradient centrifugation using Ficoll
Histopaque (Sigma Chemical, Sigma Chemical Co, St Louis,
MO), plated (1.5 106 cells/cm2) on bronectin-coated
culture dishes (Sigma), and cultured (378C, 5% CO2) up to
passage 1 in primary culture medium (PCM) composed of
endothelial growth medium (GIBCO BRL Life Technologies,
Bethesda, MD), 5 mM D-glucose, 15% fetal calf serum,
10 mg/mL of human vascular endothelial growth factor
A (VEGF-A) and 100 U/mL penicillinstreptomycin. PCM
was changed every 3 days, and hEPC were selected as cells
attached to bronectin-coated plates. In addition, experiments
were performed as described previously in hEPC cultured for
3 days (hEPC-3d) or 14 days (hEPC-14d)15,16 after cell starving (12 hours) using PCM containing 2% of serum without
growth factors.
440
| www.jcvp.org
hEPC3d Km
hEPC14d Vmax
hEPC3d Vmax hEPC14d Km
Statistical Analysis
RESULTS
Characterization of hEPC in Cultures
441
Daz-Prez et al
FIGURE 1. L-arginine transport in endothelial progenitor cells (hEPC). [3H]L-arginine transport (4 mCi/mL) was evaluated in the
presence of increasing concentrations of L-arginine (0500 mM) in hEPC-3d (A) and hEPC-14d (B). In C and D, Eadiee Hofstee
transformation of transport data from A and B, respectively. C1 and C2 are referred to component 1 and component 2,
respectively. V/S is L-arginine transport rates. The results are representative of 4 independent experiments each 1 in triplicate.
Values are mean 6 S.E.M.
442
| www.jcvp.org
FIGURE 2. Kinetic analysis of L-arginine transport for medium and high affinity components. hEPC cultured for 3 days (A, C) or
14 days (B, D) were used for L-arginine transport assays. [3H] L-arginine transport (4 mCi/mL) was evaluated with increasing
L-arginine concentrations: 0500 mM for medium affinity (A, B) and 040 mM for high affinity components (C, D). Results are
representative of 4 independent experiments each 1 in triplicate. Values are mean 6 S.E.M.
443
Daz-Prez et al
hEPC-3d
y+ (component 1)
y+L (component 2)
hEPC-14d
y+ (component 1)
y+L (component 2)
Km
(mM)
Vmax
[pmol (mg Protein)-1min-1]
Transport Capacity
(Vmax/Km)
[pmol (mg Protein)-1min)-1M)]
I/hEPC3d/hEPC14dF
85.1 6 4.0
4.8 6 1.1
0.12 6 0.001
0.004 6 0.0003
0.0014 6 0.005
0.0008 6 0.0002
95.1 6 8
6.1 6 2.4
13.5 6 1.1*
1.6 6 0.17*
0.14 6 0.04*
0.26 6 0.07*
100 6 20*
300 6 63*
L-arginine saturable transport was determined as described in Methods. Values are means 6 Standard Error (n = 12).
*P , 0.05 v/s valores correspondientes en clulas hEPC-3d. I/hEPC3d/hEPC14dF is the relative contribution of differentiation to changes in maximal transport capacity (Vmax/Km) of
L-arginine transport (see Methods).
FIGURE
3. Characterization
of
L-arginine transport mediated by
system y+ in hEPC. hEPC-3d (A)
and hEPC-14d (B) were used for
L-arginine transport assays. hEPC
were preincubated (+) with NEM
(100 mM, 30 minutes) alone or with
L-leucine (1 mM, 10 minutes). Then
L-arginine transport assays were
performed at 5 mM () or 100 mM
(n) (4 mCi/mL) as described in
Methods. Values correspond to
mean 6 S.E.M (n = 3), *P , 0.05 in
hEPC-14d v/s without NEM and
L-leucine. **P , 0.04 in hEPC-3d v/s
without NEM and L-leucine.
444
| www.jcvp.org
FIGURE
4. Characterization
of
L-arginine transport assays mediated
by system y+L in hEPC. hEPC were
cultured for 3 days [hEPC-3d, (A)] or
for 14 days [hEPC-14d, (B)]. For
L-arginine transport assays, hEPC
were exposed to Krebs solution with
sodium (+), or to a Krebs solution
where Na+ was replaced by
N-methylglucamine-HCl (-). In parallel experiments, transport assay
was also performed in cells
preincubated in Krebs (30 minutes)
with (+) or without (-) L-Leucine
(1 mM). Then L-arginine transport
assays were performed at 5 mM ()
or 100 mM (n) (4 mCi/mL)
as described in Methods. Values
represents mean 6 S.E.M (n = 3),
*P , 0.05 v/s values with Na+ and
without L-leucine in hEPC-3d and
hEP-14d.
a signicant decrease in L-citrulline formation only in hEPC14d (Fig. 7A). In parallel experiments, NO formation
assessed by the probe DAF-FM-DA conrms that only
hEPC-14d was able to synthesize NO in response to histamine (Fig. 7B), an effect also reverted by L-NAME.
DISCUSSION
This study demonstrated that hEPC are able to transport
L-arginine and synthetize NO. Accordingly, at least 2
2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
445
Daz-Prez et al
446
| www.jcvp.org
differentiation. Despite functional experiments showed a higher activity of component 1 (ie, hCAT1) in hEPC-14d than
hEPC-3d (about 100-fold), the mRNA and protein levels
for hCAT-1 were similar in hEPC cultured for 3 and 14 days.
This apparent controversy could be associated with the transporter availability in the cell membrane (ie, localization of functional transporter in the cells). Information regarding hCAT-1
translocation is limited; however, previous studies38 demonstrated that external stimuli-like insulin induces a higher expression of hCAT-1 in the plasmatic membrane, which was
associated to a high L-arginine transport in HUVECs (ie, differentiated endothelium). Nevertheless, further studies should be
carried out to prove this issue in hEPC.
On the other hand, the characterization of the high
afnity system was carried out with transport experiments
performed at 5 mM of L-arginine in the presence of L-lysine
but without sodium. As reported in undifferentiated cells29,30
and in differentiated cells such as human peripheral blood
mononuclear cells39,40 or HUVEC,5 our study suggests functional presence of y+L system in both hEPC-3d and hEPC14d. Remarkably, transport activity associated to this system
was about 300 times higher in hEPC-14d compared with
3 days cultured cells. In addition, mRNA levels of 4F2hc
were the highest expressed in both stages of differentiation.
In contrast, we could not detect the mRNA for y+L1 or y+L2
in hEPC-14d. In fact, cells on the 14th day of culture lose the
expression (ie, mRNA levels) of y+L1 that was observed on
the third day of culture. Unfortunately, there are not specic
antibodies for y+L1 or y+L2 commercially available, and then
we do not know whether changes observed in mRNA levels
are correlated with protein translation. However, because
transport activity related with this high afnity system is
increased in hEPC-14d, we can speculate that either translation or protein migration toward the membrane of the y+L
member(s) might be increased in those cells.
Elevated levels of L-arginine are necessary for cell
growth and cell differentiation.29 In this regard, other reports
have shown an increase in the y+L system activity and
a decrease in the y+ system activity, as a phenomena associated with the differentiation of monocytes into macrophages28
or with the proliferation of primary culture of monocytes
isolated from mouse bone marrow.41 Therefore, it is expected
that during cell maturation of progenitor cells, L-arginine
transporters activity changes, probably according to the phenotype of the differentiated mature cell. Among other possibilities, it is feasible that high L-arginine transport in hEPC14 may correspond to the capacity of NO synthesis.
Regarding this issue, we found that eNOS activity and
NO bioavailability were higher in hEPC-14d than in hEPC3d. These results agree with previous reports20,21 where the
eNOS activity has been described in progenitor endothelial
cells. Functional signicance of eNOS expression in hEPC is
under investigation. However, eNOS-/- mice exposed to
VEGF showed no mobilization of EPC from bone marrow
toward the blood circulation,20 suggesting that eNOS is
required by EPC-mediated regeneration.
In addition, higher L-arginine transport, NO and eNOS
activity in hEPC-14d than hEPC-3d, might suggest that
L-arginine inux in involved in the generation of NO in hEPC.
www.jcvp.org |
447
Daz-Prez et al
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank Dr Luis Sobrevia from Ponticia
Universidad Catlica de Chile, for donating cationic amino
acid transport antibodies.
REFERENCES
1. Chin-Dusting JP, Willems L, Kaye DM. L-arginine transporters in cardiovascular disease: a novel therapeutic target. Pharmacol Ther. 2007;
116:428436.
2. Mann GE, Yudilevich DL, Sobrevia L. Regulation of amino acid and
glucose transporters in endothelial and smooth muscle cells. Physiol Rev.
2003;83:183252.
3. Closs EI, Simon A, Vkony N, et al. Plasma membrane transporters for
arginine. J Nutr. 2004;134:2752S2759S.
448
| www.jcvp.org
4. Sobrevia L, Abarza F, Nien JK, et al. Differential placental macrovascular and microvascular endothelial dysfunction in gestational diabetes.
Placenta. 2001;2:S159S164.
5. Arancibia-Garavilla Y, Toledo F, Casanello P, et al. Nitric oxide synthesis requires activity of the cationic and neutral amino acid transport
system y+L in human umbilical vein endothelium. Exp Physiol. 2003;
88:699710.
6. Moncada S, Palmer RM, Higgs EA. Nitric oxide: physiology, pathophysiology, and pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev. 1991;43:109142.
7. Frstermann U. Nitric oxide and oxidative stress in vascular disease.
Pugers Arch. 2010;459:923939.
8. Cui H, Chen B, Chicoine LG, et al. Overexpression of cationic amino
acid transporter-1 increases nitric oxide production in hypoxic human
pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol.
2011;38:796803.
9. Sala R, Rotolo BM, Colla E, et al. Two-way arginine transport in human
endothelial cells: TNF-a stimulation is restricted to system y+. Am J
Physiol. 2002;282:C134C143.
10. Palmer RM, Ashton DS, Moncada S. Vascular endotelial cells synthesize
nitric oxide from L-arginine. Nature. 1998;333:664666.
11. Dye J, Lawrence L, Linge C, et al. Distinct patterns of microvascular
endothelial cell morphology are determined by extracellular matrix composition. Endothelium. 2004;11:151167.
12. Visigalli R, Bussolati O, Sala R, et al. The stimulation of arginine transport by TNFalpha in human endothelial cells depends on NF-kappaB
activation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1664:4552.
13. Ii M, Nishimura H, Iwakura A, et al. Endothelial progenitor cells are
rapidly recruited to myocardium and mediate protective effect of ischemic preconditioning via imported nitric oxide synthase activity.
Circulation. 2005;111:11141120.
14. Bauer SM, Goldstein LJ, Bauer RJ, et al. The bone marrow-derived
endothelial progenitor cell response is impaired in delayed wound healing from ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:134141.
15. Guzmn-Gutirrez E, Sandoval C, Nova E, et al. Differential expression
of functional nucleoside transporters in non-differentiated and differentiated human endothelial progenitor cells. Placenta. 2010;31:928936.
16. Fernandez P, Jara C, Aguilera V, et al. Adenosine A2A and A3 receptors
are involved in the human endothelial progenitor cells migration.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2012;59:397404.
17. Ozyaman B, Ebner P, Niesler U, et al. Nitric oxide differentially regulates proliferation and mobilization of endothelial progenitor cells but not
of hematopoietic stem cells. Thromb Haemost. 2005;94:770772.
18. Hur J, Yoon CH, Kim HS, et al. Characterization of two types of endothelial progenitor cells and their different contributions to neovasculogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24:288293.
19. Qiao W, Niu L, Liu Z, et al. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase as a marker
for human endothelial progenitor cells. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2010;221:
1927.
20. Aicher A, Heeschen C, Mildner-Rihm C, et al. Essential role of endothelial nitric oxide synthase for mobilization of stem and progenitor cells.
Nat Med. 2003;11:13701376.
21. Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A. Isolation of putative progenitor
endothelial cells for angiognesis. Science. 1997;275:964967.
22. Casanello P, Sobrevia L. Intrauterine growth retardation is associated
with reduced activity and expression of the cationic amino acid transport
systems y+/hCAT-1 and y+/hCAT-2B and lower activity of nitric oxide
synthase in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Circ Res. 2002;91:
127134.
23. Flores C, Rojas S, Aguayo C, et al. Rapid stimulation of L-arginine
transport by D-glucose involves p42/44(mapk) and nitric oxide in human
umbilical vein endothelium. Circ Res. 2003;92:6472.
24. Devs R, Angelo S, Chvez P. N-Ethylmaleimide discriminates between
two lysine transport systems in human erythrocytes. J Physiol. 1993;468:
753766.
25. Devs R, Boyd CA. Surface antigen CD98(4F2): not a single membrane
protein, but a family of proteins with multiple functions. J Membr Biol.
2000;173:165177.
26. Searle A, Gmez-Rosso L, Meroo T, et al. High LDL levels are associated with increased lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) activity
on nitric oxide synthesis and reactive oxygen species formation in human
endothelial cells. Clin Biochem. 2011;44:171177.
37. Krotova KY, Zharikov SI, Block ER. Classical isoforms of PKC as
regulators of CAT-1 transporter activity in pulmonary artery endothelial
cells. Am J Physiol. 2003;284:L1037L1044.
38. Gonzlez M, Gallardo V, Rodrguez N, et al. Insulin-stimulated L-arginine
transport requires SLC7A1 gene expression and is associated with human
umbilical vein relaxation. J Cell Physiol. 2011;226:29162924.
39. Rotoli BM, Bussolati O, Sala R, et al. INFgamma stimulates arginine
transport through system y+L in human monocytes. FEBS Lett. 2004;
571:177181.
40. McCord N, Ayuk P, McMahon M, et al. System y+ arginine transport
and NO production in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in pregnancy
and preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2006;47:109115.
41. Martn L, Comalada M, Marti L, et al. Granulocyte-macrophage colonystimulating factor increases L-arginine transport through the induction of
CAT2 in bone marrow-derived macrophages. Am J Physiol. 2006;290:
C1364C1372.
42. Kar S, Kavdia M. Modeling of biopterin-dependent pathways of eNOS
for nitric oxide and superoxide production. Free Radic Biol Med. 2011;
51:14111427.
43. McDonald KK, Zharikov S, Block ER, et al. A caveolar complex
between the cationic amino acid transporter 1 and endothelial nitric-oxide
synthase may explain the "arginine paradox". J Biol Chem. 1997;272:
3121331216.
44. Fleming I, Busse R. Molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation of
the endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Am J Physiol. 2010;284:R1R12.
45. Cui B, Huang L, Fang Y, et al. Transplantation of endothelial progenitor
cells overexpressing endothelial nitric oxide synthase enhances inhibition
of neointimal hyperplasia and restores endothelium-dependent vasodilatation. Microvasc Res. 2011;81:143150.
www.jcvp.org |
449