Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
www.elsevier.com/locate/engstruct
Abstract
This paper presents an experimental investigation of aluminum alloy circular hollow sections subjected to pure axial compression between
fixed ends. The specimens were fabricated using 6063-T5 and 6061-T6 heat-treated aluminum alloy. The test program included 29 column tests
which were separated into 4 test series of different type of aluminum alloy and cross-section geometry. Each test series contained at least 5 columns
with both ends transversely welded to aluminum end plates using the Tungsten Inert Gas welding method, and 2 columns without welding of end
plates. Hence, the effects of welding on aluminum alloy columns could be investigated. The specimen length ranged from 300 to 3000 mm in
order to obtain a column curve for each test series. The observed failure modes for the column tests include yielding, overall buckling, and material
yielding in the heat-affected zone. The test strengths were compared with the design strengths predicted by the American, Australian/New Zealand
and European specifications for aluminum structures. The purpose of this paper is to present the test results of aluminum alloy circular hollow
section columns with and without transverse welds, and to check the accuracy of the design rules in the current specifications.
c 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Aluminum alloys; Buckling; Column; Experimental investigation; Heat-affected zone; Structural design; Transverse welds
1. Introduction
Aluminum tubular members are used in curtain walls, space
structures and other structural applications, and these members
can be joined by welding. The aluminum tubular members
are normally manufactured by heat-treated aluminum alloys,
because heat-treated alloys have notably higher yield stress than
non-heat-treated alloys. The advantages of using aluminum
alloys as a structural material are the high strength-to-weight
ratio, lightness, corrosion resistance and ease of production.
However, when heat-treated aluminum alloys are welded, the
heat generated from the welding reduces the material strength
significantly in a localized region, and this is known as the
heat-affected zone (HAZ) softening. It is assumed that the heataffected zone extends 1 in. (25.4 mm) to each side of the
centre of a weld [1]. In the case of the 6000 Series alloys, the
heat generated from the welding can locally reduce the parent
metal strength by nearly half [2]. The effects of welding on
Corresponding author. Tel.: +852 2859 2674; fax: +852 2559 5337.
208
Nomenclature
A
COV
D
E0
kc
gross area;
coefficient of variation;
overall diameter of CHS;
initial Youngs modulus;
coefficient for compression members in the
AS/NZS Standard;
L
length of specimen;
le
effective length of specimen;
n
exponent in the RambergOsgood expression;
unfactored design strength of non-welded colPAA
umn calculated using material properties obtained from tensile coupon tests for American
Aluminum Design Manual;
25
unfactored design strength of welded column
PAA,w
calculated using material properties obtained
from tensile coupon tests of 25 mm gauge length
for American Aluminum Design Manual;
PAS/NZS unfactored design strength of non-welded column calculated using material properties obtained from tensile coupon tests for Australian/New Zealand Standard;
25
unfactored design strength of welded column
PAS/NZS,w
calculated using material properties obtained
from tensile coupon tests of 25 mm gauge length
for Australian/New Zealand Standard;
unfactored design strength of non-welded column
PEC9
for Eurocode 9;
PEC9,w unfactored design strength of welded column
calculated using non-welded material properties
for Eurocode 9;
experimental ultimate load of column (test
PExp
strength);
mean value of tested-to-predicted load ratio;
Pm
ry
radius of gyration for the CHS section;
t
thickness of section;
measured column overall geometric imperfecx
tions about x-axis at mid-length;
measured column overall geometric imperfecy
tions about y-axis at mid-length;
elongation (tensile strain) at fracture;
f
c
local buckling coefficient specified in the Eurocode 9;
heat-affected zone (HAZ) softening factor specihaz
fied in the Eurocode 9;
static 0.2% proof stress; and
0.2
u
static ultimate tensile strength.
numerical results for aluminum columns having longitudinal
and transverse welds.
The purpose of this paper is firstly to present a test
program on fixed-ended aluminum alloy circular hollow section
columns with and without transverse welds; and secondly, to
compare the test strengths with the design strengths predicted
using the American Aluminum Design Manual (AA) [1],
Table 1
CHS column test series
Test series
Material
Dimension D t (mm)
N-C1
N-C2
H-C1
H-C2
6063-T5
6063-T5
6061-T6
6061-T6
50 1.6
50 3.0
50 1.6
50 3.0
209
Table 5
Measured specimen dimensions for Series H-C2
Table 2
Measured specimen dimensions for Series N-C1
Specimen
Thickness t
(mm)
Diameter D
(mm)
Length L
(mm)
Area A
(mm2 )
Specimen
Thickness
t (mm)
Diameter
D (mm)
Length
L (mm)
Area
A (mm2 )
N-C1-NW-L300
N-C1-NW-L1000
1.58
1.55
50.0
49.9
299.5
1000.9
239.9
235.4
H-C2-NW-L300
H-C2-NW-L1000
3.05
3.06
49.7
49.7
300.3
1000.6
446.1
448.7
N-C1-W-L300
N-C1-W-L1000
N-C1-W-L1650
N-C1-W-L2350
N-C1-W-L3000
1.54
1.55
1.55
1.54
1.57
49.9
49.9
50.0
49.9
49.9
300.3
1000.8
1649.8
2347.2
3000.3
234.5
235.4
236.3
234.4
238.3
H-C2-W-L300
H-C2-W-L1000
H-C2-W-L1650
H-C2-W-L2350
H-C2-W-L3000
3.05
3.04
3.06
3.05
3.06
49.7
49.7
49.7
49.7
49.9
299.8
999.0
1649.0
2349.2
2999.7
446.8
445.5
447.7
445.7
449.9
Mean
COV
1.55
0.008
49.9
0.001
236.2
0.008
Mean
COV
3.05
0.002
49.7
0.001
447.2
0.004
Table 3
Measured specimen dimensions for Series N-C2
Specimen
Thickness t
(mm)
Diameter D
(mm)
Length L
(mm)
Area A
(mm2 )
N-C2-NW-L300
N-C2-NW-L1000
3.06
3.05
49.8
49.8
299.7
1000.3
449.6
447.9
N-C2-W-L300
N-C2-W-L300-R
N-C2-W-L1000
N-C2-W-L1650
N-C2-W-L2350
N-C2-W-L3000
3.05
3.06
3.06
3.04
3.05
3.05
49.8
49.8
49.8
49.8
49.8
49.8
300.2
300.1
999.6
1649.6
2350.0
2999.5
448.3
449.3
449.0
446.8
447.7
447.7
Mean
COV
3.05
0.002
49.8
0.000
448.3
0.002
Thickness t
(mm)
Diameter D
(mm)
Length L
(mm)
Area A
(mm2 )
H-C1-NW-L300
H-C1-NW-L1000
1.56
1.56
50.1
50.2
299.8
1000.2
238.3
237.9
H-C1-W-L300
H-C1-W-L1000
H-C1-W-L1650
H-C1-W-L2350
H-C1-W-L3000
1.54
1.53
1.53
1.55
1.55
49.9
49.9
50.0
50.1
50.0
301.1
999.6
1649.8
2350.5
2999.6
233.1
232.7
232.9
235.6
236.0
Mean
COV
1.55
0.009
50.0
0.002
235.2
0.010
210
E0
(GPa)
0.2
(MPa)
u
(MPa)
f
(%)
N-C1-W
N-C1-NW
N-C2-W
N-C2-NW
73.0
66.7
71.6
67.1
71.3
194.6
75.3
185.9
120.9
214.4
109.7
207.7
9.9
10.0
6.9
10.4
8
17
9
8
H-C1-W
H-C1-NW
H-C2-W
H-C2-NW
72.6
67.1
71.7
70.2
92.5
286.7
94.3
278.9
148.3
310.1
161.2
284.3
10.7
10.7
10.9
11.7
16
29
16
34
211
Table 7
Measured overall geometric imperfections at mid-length
Specimen
x /L
y /L
N-C1-NW-L1000
N-C1-W-L1000
N-C1-W-L1650
N-C1-W-L2350
N-C1-W-L3000
1/3028
1/7881
1/12 991
1/18 482
1/47 249
1/1969
1/5254
1/1732
1/36 963
1/11 812
N-C2-NW-L1000
N-C2-W-L1000
N-C2-W-L1650
N-C2-W-L2350
N-C2-W-L3000
1/3750
1/39 354
1/3511
1/12 336
1/59 046
1/1432
1/7871
1/24 589
1/15 420
1/3149
H-C1-NW-L1000
H-C1-W-L1000
H-C1-W-L1650
H-C1-W-L2350
H-C1-W-L3000
1/562
1/1968
1/11 809
1/2080
1/23 619
1/1514
1/8745
1/6495
1/2892
1/665
H-C2-NW-L1000
H-C2-W-L1000
H-C2-W-L1650
H-C2-W-L2350
H-C2-W-L3000
1/3750
1/7866
1/11 804
1/4111
1/3149
1/1640
1/5244
1/854
1/8408
1/2249
column. The bottom end plate of the specimen was then bolted
to the special bearing, and the bearing was restrained in the
same way as the non-welded column tests. Hence, the welded
column specimens were considered as fixed-ended column
tests. It should be noted that the testing conditions of the
welded and non-welded columns were identical, except for
the transverse welds which were introduced at the ends of the
welded column.
Strain gauges were attached in the axial direction at the
mid-lengths of the 300 mm length columns. Three laser
displacement transducers were used to measure the axial
shortening of the specimens. Displacement control was used to
drive the hydraulic actuator at a constant speed of 0.1 mm/min.
The use of displacement control allowed the tests to be
continued into the post-ultimate range. A data acquisition
system was used to record the applied load and the readings of
the laser displacement transducers, as well as the strain gauge
readings at regular intervals during the tests.
2.5. Measured overall geometric imperfections
Initial overall geometric imperfections were measured on
all specimens prior to testing, except for the short specimens
of 300 mm in length. The overall geometric imperfection
measurements comprised the flexural imperfections about both
the x- and y-axes of the CHS specimen. After the specimen
was properly positioned in the test rig, an axial force of
approximately 1 kN was applied to hold the specimen in place.
Theodolites were then used to obtain readings at the mid-length
and near both ends of the specimen. The measured overall
geometric imperfections at mid-length about the x-axis (x )
and y-axis ( y ) normalized with respect to the specimen length
(L) are shown in Table 7. The maximum measured overall
geometric imperfections at mid-length were 1/1732, 1/1432,
212
Table 8
Comparison of test strengths with design strengths for Series N-C1
Specimens
Test
Comparison
Non-welded
PExp (kN)
PExp /PAA
PExp /PAS/NZS
PExp /PEC9
N-C1-NW-L300
N-C1-NW-L1000
48.5
45.9
1.04
1.08
1.16
1.12
1.07
1.11
Welded
PExp (kN)
25
PExp /PAA,w
25
PExp /PAS/NZS,w
PExp /PEC9,w
N-C1-W-L300
N-C1-W-L1000
N-C1-W-L1650
N-C1-W-L2350
N-C1-W-L3000
35.9
30.3
27.9
21.4
17.3
2.15
1.86
1.87
1.61
1.43
2.41
2.02
1.86
1.61
1.43
1.33
1.22
1.32
1.46
1.69
Mean
COV
1.78
0.156
1.87
0.203
1.40
0.129
Test
Comparison
Non-welded
PExp (kN)
PExp /PAA
PExp /PAS/NZS
PExp /PEC9
N-C2-NW-L300
N-C2-NW-L1000
102.4
86.1
1.20
1.10
1.37
1.16
1.24
1.14
Welded
PExp (kN)
25
PExp /PAA,w
25
PExp /PAS/NZS,w
PExp /PEC9,w
2.06
1.92
1.99
1.65
1.35
1.22
2.30
2.15
2.16
1.65
1.35
1.22
1.40
1.31
1.44
1.28
1.33
1.56
1.70
0.208
1.80
0.256
1.39
0.073
N-C2-W-L300
N-C2-W-L300-R
N-C2-W-L1000
N-C2-W-L1650
N-C2-W-L2350
N-C2-W-L3000
Mean
COV
69.4
65.1
65.1
48.6
35.3
28.3
Test
Comparison
Non-welded
PExp (kN)
PExp /PAA
PExp /PAS/NZS
PExp /PEC9
H-C1-NW-L300
H-C1-NW-L1000
75.9
71.7
1.11
1.16
1.25
1.17
1.13
1.20
Welded
PExp (kN)
25
PExp /PAA,w
25
PExp /PAS/NZS,w
PExp /PEC9,w
H-C1-W-L300
H-C1-W-L1000
H-C1-W-L1650
H-C1-W-L2350
H-C1-W-L3000
47.2
39.0
36.8
25.3
17.0
2.18
1.88
1.97
1.52
1.17
2.45
2.03
1.97
1.52
1.17
1.43
1.35
1.68
1.85
1.91
Mean
COV
1.74
0.228
1.83
0.270
1.64
0.151
213
Table 11
Comparison of test strengths with design strengths for Series H-C2
Specimens
Test
Comparison
Non-welded
PExp (kN)
PExp /PAA
PExp /PAS/NZS
PExp /PEC9
H-C2-NW-L300
H-C2-NW-L1000
129.6
119.6
1.04
1.06
1.16
1.07
1.06
1.10
Welded
PExp (kN)
25
PExp /PAA,w
25
PExp /PAS/NZS,w
PExp /PEC9,w
H-C2-W-L300
H-C2-W-L1000
H-C2-W-L1650
H-C2-W-L2350
H-C2-W-L3000
88.0
84.5
66.9
44.6
33.0
2.09
2.10
1.85
1.42
1.21
2.34
2.24
1.85
1.42
1.21
1.44
1.56
1.63
1.77
1.97
Mean
COV
1.73
0.232
1.81
0.274
1.68
0.123
Fig. 4. Axial load versus shorting for specimens N-C2-L2350 and H-C2L2350.
214
shown in Tables 811 for Series N-C1, N-C2, H-C1 and HC2, respectively. The test strengths are also compared with the
column design curves obtained from the three specifications, as
shown in Figs. 58. For the non-welded columns, it can be seen
that the design strengths predicted by the AA, AS/NZS and EC9
specifications are conservative, as shown in Tables 811. The
load ratios PExp /PAA , PExp /PAS/NZS , and PExp /PEC9 ranged
[1.041.20], [1.071.37] and [1.061.24] respectively, for all
series.
For the welded columns, it is shown that the design strengths
25 ) and AS/NZS (P 25
predicted by the AA (PAA,w
AS/NZS,w )
specifications are quite conservative, as shown in Tables 811.
For the 6063-T5 normal strength aluminum alloy of Series
25
and
N-C1, the mean value of the load ratios PExp /PAA,w
25
PExp /PAS/NZS,w
are 1.78 and 1.87, with the corresponding
COV of 0.156 and 0.203, respectively. For Series N-C2, the
25
25
and PExp /PAS/NZS,w
mean value of the load ratios PExp /PAA,w
are 1.70 and 1.80, with the corresponding COV of 0.208 and
0.256, respectively. Similar results were obtained for the 6061T6 high strength aluminum alloy of Series H-C1 and H-C2, as
shown in Tables 10 and 11, respectively.
The design strengths predicted by the EC9 Code (PEC9,w )
are also conservative for all welded columns. It is shown
that the design strengths predicted by the EC9 Code for the
welded columns of 6061-T6 high strength aluminum alloy are
relatively more conservative than the welded columns of 6063T5 normal strength aluminum alloy, as shown in Tables 811.
This could be due to a conservative value of haz being used for
6061-T6 aluminum alloy. For the normal strength aluminum
alloy of Series N-C1 and N-C2, the mean values of the load
ratio PExp /PEC9,w are 1.40 and 1.39, with the corresponding
COV of 0.129 and 0.073, respectively. For the high strength
aluminum alloy of Series H-C1 and H-C2, the mean values
of the load ratio PExp /PEC9,w are 1.64 and 1.68, with the
corresponding COV of 0.151 and 0.123, respectively. It can
be seen that the design strengths predicted by the EC9 Code
are less conservative compared with the AA and AS/NZS
specifications for the welded columns.
5. Conclusions
A test program on aluminum alloy circular hollow
section fixed-ended columns has been presented. The test
program consisted of column specimens with and without
transverse welds. Overall initial geometric imperfections
of the specimens were measured. A comparison of the
column test strengths with the design strengths predicted
by the American, Australian/New Zealand and European
specifications for aluminum structures has been presented.
The design strengths predicted by the three specifications
are conservative for non-welded columns, whereas the design
strengths predicted by the three specifications are even more
conservative for welded columns compared with non-welded
columns. Generally, the design strengths predicted by the
European Code are less conservative than the design strengths
predicted by the American and Australian/New Zealand
specifications for aluminum circular hollow section columns
containing transverse welds.
Acknowledgment
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Asia Aluminum
Manufacturing Company for supplying the test specimens.
[6]
References
[8]
[7]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
215