Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
I. I NTRODUCTION
Multiplexing
transmission
c 2013 IEEE
0090-6778/13$31.00
LI et al.: INTERCARRIER INTERFERENCE IMMUNE SINGLE CARRIER OFDM VIA MAGNITUDE-KEYED MODULATION FOR HIGH SPEED AERIAL . . .
N
1
k=0
(1)
659
N1
k=0
(2)
N1
k=0
(3)
N
1
xl l S(l k) + nk ,
(4)
l=0,l=k
k = 0, 1, . . . , N 1 ,
where the first term is the desired signal component ykd =
xk k S(0), the second term is the ICI component
ykICI =
N
1
xl l S(l k) ,
(5)
l=0,l=k
S(0)
S(1)
... S(1 N )
S(1)
S(0)
... S(2 N )
S=
(8)
..
..
..
..
.
.
.
.
S(N 1) S(N 2)
S(0)
660
SC-OFDM receiver.
SC-OFDM transmitter.
rl =
(9)
1
xk S(k l)
(11)
N
k=0
N 1
2
2
+ nl
wi i exp j l i exp j k i
N
N
i=0
where l = 0, 1, ..., N 1
where wi denotes the combining weight. By assuming EqualGain Combining (EGC) scheme has been applied [22], we
have wi = 1. It is clear that the lth decoded data symbol rl
contains a desired signal component, given by (11) with k = l
as
N 1
2
1
2
d
rl = xl S(0)
i exp j l i exp j l i
N
N
N
i=0
N 1
1
xl S(0)
i
N
i=0
(12)
LI et al.: INTERCARRIER INTERFERENCE IMMUNE SINGLE CARRIER OFDM VIA MAGNITUDE-KEYED MODULATION FOR HIGH SPEED AERIAL . . .
10
=0.0
=0.1
=0.2
=0.3
=0.4
=1
=3
=7
=15
|S(lm)|
10
10
10
Fig. 3.
30
20
10
0
lm
10
20
661
30
1
N
N
1
xk S(k l)
(13)
k=0,k=l
N 1
i=0
2
2
.
i exp j l i exp j k i
N
N
(14)
(16)
OFDM
SCOFDM
1
ICR
662
0.5
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
ICI P ower
.
Desired Signal P ower
(18)
(19)
N
1
xl S(l k) + nk
l=0,l=k
(20)
where S(:, k) is used to denote all elements in the k th column
of S. Considering desired and undesired signal components
separately, the corresponding power in the desired signal
component xk S(0) is
E[ |Desired Signal|2 ] = E |xk S(0)|2 ,
(21)
LI et al.: INTERCARRIER INTERFERENCE IMMUNE SINGLE CARRIER OFDM VIA MAGNITUDE-KEYED MODULATION FOR HIGH SPEED AERIAL . . .
663
(22)
1
1
S(k, l, ) = IDFT(k, :) D() DFT(:, l) , (25)
N
N
where
2
2
2
IDFT(k, :) = ej N k0 , ej N k1 , . . . , ej N k(N 1)
,
ICROF DM
E[ |ICI|2 ]
=
E[ |Desired Signal|2 ]
N 1
E[ | l=0,l=k xl S(l k)|2 ]
=
E[ |xk S(0)|2 ]
(23)
=
N 1 cos 2
N (k l + ) j sin N (k l + )
1 1 exp [j2(k l + )]
=
N 1 exp j 2
N (k l + )
N 1
2
1
exp j (k l + )
=
N
N
l=0
S(k, l, ) =
N1
2
2
1
2
exp j k exp j exp j l .
N
N
N
N
l=0
(24)
j 2 0
e N
D() =
1N
ej N 1
..
.
ej N (N 1)
N N
T
2
2
2
DFT(:, l) = ej N l0 , ej N l1 , . . . , ej N l(N 1)
1N
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
664
(30)
= Q1 0, SN R + 1 Q1 2 SN R, SN R /2 ,
(31)
where Q1 is the Marcum Q-Function [32] defined as
2
2
1
xM e(x + )/2 IM1 (x)dx ,
QM (, ) = M1
(32)
where In (x) is a modified Bessel function of the first kind
[33]. It can also be written in series form as
k
2
2
QM (, ) = e( + )/2
Ik () . (33)
k=1M
L1
P (
xk = m|xk = m)P (xk = m)
m=0
L1
P (
xk = m|xk = m)/L
m=0
= Q1 (0, 0.5)/L
+
L2
m=1
(35)
(34)
where = Signal
=
(L1)(2L1) , and the
N oise P ower
resultant MKM BER can be approximated using the following
(37)
LI et al.: INTERCARRIER INTERFERENCE IMMUNE SINGLE CARRIER OFDM VIA MAGNITUDE-KEYED MODULATION FOR HIGH SPEED AERIAL . . .
N=256
determined by
FHFH | |r||2 ) ,
= arg min(||x
x
0.9
0.8
x
MKM+SCOFDM
PSK+SCOFDM
2ary
4ary
8ary
0.7
CDF
0.6
MKM+OFDM
0.3
PSK+OFDM
0.2
0.1
0
Fig. 5.
(39)
0.5
0.4
665
10
15
PAPR(dB)
20
25
TABLE I
C OMPARISON OF PAPR ( D B) FOR D IFFERENT S YSTEM C ONFIGURATIONS
Configuration
Maximum
Minimum
Average
OFDM+BPSK
OFDM+2MKM
SC-OFDM+BPSK
SC-OFDM+2MKM
13.76
22.15
0
4.59
4.38
19.78
0
2.01
7.34
21.06
0
3.02
OFDM+QPSK
OFDM+4MKM
SC-OFDM+QPSK
SC-OFDM+4MKM
12.54
22.80
0
5.42
5.29
21.27
0
3.07
7.81
22.16
0
4.11
OFDM+8PSK
OFDM+8MKM
SC-OFDM+8PSK
SC-OFDM+8MKM
12.24
23.03
0
5.70
5.29
21.92
0
3.45
7.81
22.53
0
4.48
666
10
10
10
10
8ary
OFDM+PSK
SCOFDM+PSK
MCCDMA+PSK
SCOFDM+MKM
10
2
BER
BER
10
4ary
10
10
10
10
2ary
10
OFDM+8QAM
SCOFDM+8QAM
MCCDMA+8QAM
SCOFDM+8MKM
10
6
SNR(dB)
10
12
Fig. 6. AWGN channel: BER vs. SNR for OFDM & SC-OFDM with binary
modulations, N = 64 subcarriers, and = 0.3.
10
0.2
0.4
0.2
0.6
0.4
0.6
0.8
0.8
1
1
Fig. 8. AWGN channel: BER vs. for OFDM & SC-OFDM using N = 64
subcarriers, SN R = 10 dB, and indicated modulation order.
10
10
BER
10
10
10
8
10
SNR(dB)
12
14
16
18
10
10
BER
10
10
10
10
SNR(dB)
15
20
LI et al.: INTERCARRIER INTERFERENCE IMMUNE SINGLE CARRIER OFDM VIA MAGNITUDE-KEYED MODULATION FOR HIGH SPEED AERIAL . . .
BER performance in AWGN channel when max=0.4
667
10
10
R EFERENCES
2
BER
10
10
10
10
15
SNR(dB)
20
25
30
Fig. 9. Multipath fading channel: BER vs. SNR for OFDM & SC-OFDM
with binary modulation, N = 16 subcarriers, and max = 0.4.
[1] S. Hara and R. Prasad, Multicarrier Techniques for 4G Mobile Communications, 1st edition. Artech House, 2003.
[2] W. M. Jang, L. Nguyen, and P. Bidarkar, MAI and ICI of synchronous
downlink MC-CDMA with frequency offset, IEEE Trans. Wireless
Commun., vol. 5, pp. 693703, Mar. 2006.
[3] T. R. Wang, J. G. Proakis, E. Masry, and J. R. Zeidler, Performance
degradation of OFDM systems due to Doppler spreading, IEEE Trans.
Wireless Commun., vol. 5, pp. 14221432, June 2006.
[4] Y. Zhao and S.-G. Haggman, Intercarrier interference self-cancellation
scheme for OFDM mobile communication systems, IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 49, pp. 11851191, July 2001.
[5] A. Seyedi and G. Saulnier, General ICI self-cancellation scheme for
OFDM systems, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 54, pp. 198210, Jan.
2005.
[6] H.-G. Ryu, Y. Li, and J.-S. Park, An improved ICI reduction method
in OFDM communication system, IEEE Trans. Broadcasting, vol. 51,
pp. 395400, Sept. 2005.
[7] Z. Jianhua, H. Rohling, and Z. Ping, Analysis of ICI cancellation
scheme in OFDM systems with phase noise, IEEE Trans. Broadcasting,
vol. 50, pp. 97106, June 2004.
[8] S.-M. Tseng, Y.-C. Kuo, and Y.-T. Hsu, Turbo ICI cancellation and
LDPC decoding for OFDM systems, in Adv. Technol. Commun.,
pp. 405408, Oct. 2008.
[9] R. Zhou, X. Li, V. Chakravarthy, B. Wang, and Z. Wu, Inter-carrier
interference self-cancellation in synchronous downlink MC-CDMA system, in Proc. 2009 IEEE International Conf. Wireless Commun. Mobile
Comput., pp. 739743.
[10] X. Li, R. Zhou, V. Chakravarthy, S. Hong, and Z. Wu, Total intercarrier
interference cancellation for OFDM mobile communication systems, in
Proc. 2010 IEEE Consumer Commun. Netw. Conf., pp. 15.
[11] H. Minn, P. Tarasak, and V. Bhargava, OFDM frequency offset estimation based on BLUE principle, in Proc. 2002 IEEE Veh. Technol.
Conf. Fall, vol. 2, pp. 12301234.
[12] A. J. Coulson, Maximum likelihood synchronization for OFDM using a
pilot symbol: analysis, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 19, pp. 2495
2503, Dec. 2001.
[13] M. Morelli and U. Mengali, An improved frequency offset estimator
for OFDM applications, IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 3, pp. 7577, Mar.
1999.
[14] H. Kobayashi, T. Fukuhara, H. Yuan, and Y. Takeuchi, Proposal of
single carrier OFDM technique with adaptive modulation method, in
Proc. 2003 IEEE Veh. Technol. Conf. Spring, vol. 3, pp. 19151919.
[15] A. Czylwik, Comparison between adaptive OFDM and single carrier
modulation with frequency domain equalization, in Proc. 1997 IEEE
Veh. Technol. Conf. Spring, vol. 2, pp. 865869.
[16] J. Tubbax, B. Come, L. V. der Perre, L. Deneire, S. Donnay, and
M. Engels, OFDM versus single carrier with cyclic prefix: a systembased comparison, in Proc. 2001 IEEE Veh. Technol. Conf. Fall,
vol. 2, pp. 11151119.
[17] D. Falconer, S. L. Ariyavisitakul, A. Benyamin-Seeyar, and B. Eidson,
Frequency domain equalization for single-carrier broadband wireless
systems, IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 40, pp. 5866, Apr. 2002.
[18] N. Benvenuto and S. Tomasin, On the comparison between OFDM
and single carrier modulation with a DFE using a frequency-domain
feedforward filter, IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 50, pp. 947955, June
2002.
[19] C. R. Nassar, B. Natarajan, Z. Wu, D. Wiegandt, S. Zekavat, and
S. Shattil, Multi-Carrier Technologies for Wireless Communications.
Springer, 2001.
[20] D. A. Wiegandt, Z. Wu, and C. R. Nassar, High-throughput, high performance OFDM via pseudo-orthogonal carrier interferometry spreading
codes, IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 51, pp. 11231134, July 2003.
[21] D. A. Wiegandt, Z. Wu, and C. R. Nassar, High-performance carrier
interferometry OFDM WLANs: RF testing, in Proc. 2003 IEEE International Conf. Commun., vol. 1, pp. 203207.
[22] A. Chandra, Diversity Combining for Digital Signals in Wireless Fading
Channels: Analysis and Simulation of Error Performance. LAP Lambert
Academic, 2011.
[23] J. van de Beek, M. Sandell, and P. Borjesson, ML estimation of time
and frequency offset in OFDM systems, IEEE Trans. Signal Process.,
vol. 45, pp. 18001805, July 1997.
668
Vasu D. Chakravarthy (M98) is a Senior Electronics Engineer at Air Force Research Laboratories
(AFRL), Sensors Directorate (SN), EW Techniques
Development and Analysis Branch, and also serves
as an adjunct faculty at Wright State University,
Dayton OH. He received his B.S in Electrical Engineering from University of Illinois at Chicago
in 1988, M.S and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering
from Wright State University in 1998 and 2008
respectively. Dr. Chakravarthy has been with AFRL
since 1996 with an experience background in RF
data links, Digital Receivers, Software GPS receivers and Communication
Countermeasures. Research interest includes physical layer waveforms and
signal processing algorithms related to Digital and Wireless Communications,
issues related to Dynamic Spectrum Access, Cognitive Radio, Cognitive
Jamming and Software Defined Radio technologies.
Michael A. Temple (SM02) Professor of Electrical
Engineering, Department of Electrical and Computer
Engineering, (AFIT/ENG); BSE, Southern Illinois
University, Edwardsville IL, 1985; MSE, Southern
Illinois University, 1986; Ph.D., Air Force Institute
of Technology, 1993. Dr. Temples research interests
include passive emitter identification, tracking and
location using RF Distinct Native Attribute (RFDNA) fingerprinting and complex waveform generation using a Spectrally Modulated, Spectrally Encoded (SMSE) framework to improve digital communication efficiency. His sponsored research efforts in Command, Control,
Communications and Intelligence (C3I) and Electronic Warfare (EW), as
adopted by and/or transitioned to agencies within the US Department of
Defense, has provided over $2M in R&D technology benefit. Dr. Temple
has been a senior member of IEEE since January 2002.
Zhiqiang Wu (M02) was born in Guiyang, China,
in 1973. He received the B.S. degree from Beijing
University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China, in 1993, the M.S. degree from Peking
University, Beijing, in 1996, and the Ph.D. degree
from Colorado State University, Fort Collins, in
2002, all in electrical engineering. Currently, he
serves as an Associate Professor in the Department
of Electrical Engineering, Wright State University,
Dayton, OH.