Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Authorized licensed use limited to: Nanchang University Trial User. Downloaded on March 16, 2009 at 00:55 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
III. SOFT MAGNETIC COMPOSITE MATERIALS IN
ROTATING ELECTRICAL MACHINES
Electrical steel lamination is the most commonly used core
material in electrical machines. Electrical steels are typically
classified into grain-oriented electrical steels and non-oriented
electrical steels. Typical applications for grain-oriented steels
are power transformer cores whereas non-oriented steels are
broadly used in different kinds of rotating electrical machines.
Electromechanical steels currently used in the manufacture of
electrical machines posses high induction of magnetic
saturation (Bs~2T), low coercive force (Hc< 100A/m), and they
are characterized by low total losses [2] and [4]. Electrical
sheet steels have been the dominant choice for the soft iron
components in electrical machines subject to time varying
magnetic fields. The new soft iron powder metallurgy
materials can be considered as an alternative for magnetic core
Fig .4. B-H characteristics of laminated steel and SMC.
of the electrical machines. The basis for soft magnetic
composites is bonded iron powder developed by Hoganas of
Sweden [5] as shown in Fig. 3. The powder is coated, pressed IV. THE 2D NUMERICAL FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS
into a solid material using a die, and heat-treated to anneal and
The time stepped finite element analysis is the most
cure the bond.
accurate method available to obtain the magnetic
characteristics in an electromagnetic device. In this paper a
two-dimensional finite element analysis has been carried out
on the two machines depicted in table I using FEA based CAD
package MagNet 6.22.1
Configuration -1 Configuration -2
Fig. 3. Iron powder after (a) coating and (b) compression. Laminated sheet steel rotor
Soft Magnetic Composite (SMC) rotor
(M19)
The B-H characteristics of M19 silicon steel and SMC
material SOMALOY 500, shown in Fig. 4, reveals that
although the SMC has inferior relative permeability when The following assumptions are made in determining the
compared with lamination steel it still posses the following magnetic field distribution inside the motor using finite
desirable characteristics [3]. element analysis [6].
a. The outer periphery of the stator can be treated as a zero
a. Reduced copper volume as a result of increased fill factor vector potential line with the magnetic field outside the
and reduced end winding length and reduced copper loss stator is negligible.
as a result of the reduced copper volume, b. Magnetic materials of stator and rotor are isotropic and the
b. Reduced high frequency tooth ripple losses since the SMC magnetization curve is single valued.
has essentially very low eddy current losses, c. Magnetic vector potential (A) and current density (J) has
c. Potential for reduced air gap length as a result of the tight only z-directed components.
tolerances maintained in manufacturing SMC material, d. End effects are neglected.
d. Modular construction allows the possibility of easy
removal of an individual modular unit for quick repair or The fine mesh has been employed to enhance the accuracy
replacement, of the results that has been obtained .The meshed structure of
e. Stator is easily recyclable since the stator can again be the model is depicted in Fig. 5.
compressed back into powered form with pressure and the
copper windings readily removed.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Nanchang University Trial User. Downloaded on March 16, 2009 at 00:55 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
table II. The computational results show that there is a 4%
difference in weight of the all SMC material configuration in
comparison with all sheet steel configurations which has a
profound impact in machines of bigger size thus resulting a
substantial saving in the usage of material for all SMC
configuration, which leads to lower production cost.
TABLE II MASS OF ACTIVE PARTS OF MOTOR CONFIGURATIONS
Total 4.26
(Yoke +Poles) rotor 0.323 0.311
rotor X10 -5
Shaft of
rotor Lstk .π .rsh 2 9.74
X10 -6
0.074 0.074
Yoke of
stator Lstk .π .(r32 − r2 2 ) 9.27
X10 –5
0.704 0.677
Poles of 4.49
stator N s .t s .d s .Lstk X10 -5
0.341 0.328
Total 1.38
(Yoke +Poles) stator 1.046 1.006
stator X10 -4
0.348
2⋅ h ⋅ b ⋅ L ⋅N 3.88X10-
Winding
c c stk s 5
Total
(Stator + Rotor) 18 X10 -5 1.718 1.666
motor
% Difference in Weight between configurations with conventional
machine (ie. Configuration 1) 4%
Authorized licensed use limited to: Nanchang University Trial User. Downloaded on March 16, 2009 at 00:55 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
level of torque obtained, while the torque-to-weight ratio is APPENDIX
23% higher than configuration-2, the all SMCs.
Configuration 1 2
Authorized licensed use limited to: Nanchang University Trial User. Downloaded on March 16, 2009 at 00:55 from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.