Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
www.elsevier.com/locate/addr
FibroGen, Inc., 225 Gateway Boulevard, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA
b
FibroGen Europe, Medipolis, FIN-90230 Oulu, Finland
Received 16 July 2003; accepted 26 August 2003
Abstract
The tools of recombinant protein expression are now being used to provide recombinant sources of both collagen and
gelatin. The primary focus of this review is to discuss alternatives to bovine collagen for biomedical applications. Several
recombinant systems have been developed for production of human sequence collagens. Mammalian and insect cells were
initially used, but were thought to be too costly for commercial production. Yeast have been engineered to express high levels of
type I homotrimer and heterotrimer and type II and type III collagen. Co-expression of collagen genes and cDNAs encoding the
subunits of prolyl hydroxylase has lead to the synthesis of completely hydroxylated, thermostable collagens. Human types I and
III collagen homotrimers have been expressed in transgenic tobacco plants, while transgenic mice have been engineered to
produce full-length type I procollagen homotrimer as well as a a2 (I) homotrimeric mini-collagen. Most recently, a transgenic
silkworm system was used to produce a fusion protein containing a collagenous sequence. Each of these transgenic systems
holds great promise for the cost-effective large-scale production of recombinant human collagens. As seen in other recombinant
expression systems, transgenic silkworms, tobacco, and mice lack sufficient endogenous prolyl hydroxylase activity to produce
fully hydroxylated collagen. In mice and tobacco, this was overcome by over-expression of prolyl hydroxylase, analogous to
what has been done in yeast and insect cell culture. In addition to recombinant alternatives to bovine collagen, other sources
such as fish and sponge collagen are discussed briefly. Recombinant gelatin has been expressed in Pichia pastoris and
Hansenula polymorpha in both non-hydroxylated and hydroxylated forms. Pichia was shown to be a highly productive system
for gelatin production. The recombinant gelatins produced in yeast are of defined molecular weight and physio-chemical
properties and represent a new biomaterial not previously available from animal sources. Genetic engineering has made great
progress in the areas of recombinant collagen and gelatin expression, and there are now several alternatives to bovine material
that offer an enhanced safety profile, greater reproducibility and quality, and the ability of these materials to be tailored to
enhance product performance.
D 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Recombinant collagen; Recombinant gelatin; Yeast; Transgenic animals and plants; Prolyl hydroxylase; Hydroxyproline
1548
Contents
1.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.1. Characteristics of collagens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.2. Prolyl hydroxylase and collagen synthesis . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Recombinant collagens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.1. Expression in yeast . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.1.1. Characterization of recombinant collagen from P. pastoris.
2.2. Transgenic systems for expression of recombinant collagen . . . .
2.2.1. Expression in tobacco . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2.2. Expression in mice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2.3. Expression in silkworms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.3. Expression in E. coli . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Formulations of collagen for drug delivery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1. Collagen sponges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2. Collagen membranes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3. Collagen stents and vascular graft coatings . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4. Non-recombinant alternatives to bovine collagen . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.1. Fish collagen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.2. Sponge collagen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.3. Non-recombinant human collagen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5. Characteristics of gelatins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.1. Recombinant gelatins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.2. Production of gelatins in plants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.3. Gelatins as substrates for cell attachment . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.4. Gelatins as coatings for microcarriers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acknowledgements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1. Introduction
Collagens and gelatins are widely used in drug
delivery and pharmaceutical applications, as well as
in many medical devices [1 3]. Today, these materials
come from animal sources. In excess of 50,000 metric
tons of collagen and gelatin are used in medical
applications annually. These materials serve a variety
of functions as implants, hemostats, device coatings,
and stabilizers for biologics. There are increasing
concerns with the continued use of animal-derived
collagens and gelatins [4]. The concerns have several
facets, including issues of biocompatibility, the ability
of tissue-derived collagens and gelatins to transmit
pathogenic vectors including prions, and finally, product homogeneity and the degree to which collagen and
gelatins can be considered well-characterized biological materials is questionable [2,5]. These concerns
have spurred interest in the development of alternate
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1548
1548
1549
1550
1550
1551
1553
1554
1555
1555
1556
1556
1556
1558
1558
1558
1558
1559
1559
1559
1559
1562
1563
1563
1564
1564
materials including the development of new, nonanimal sources of collagens and gelatins.
1.1. Characteristics of collagens
The collagen family has been well described (for a
review, see Prockop and Kivirikko [6]). This section
provides a brief discussion of collagens, focusing on
their physical structure and properties. In humans, 25
distinct collagen types have been identified to date on
the basis of protein and/or DNA sequence information. A list of collagen types and some tissues in
which they are found is provided in Table 1.
Medical applications of collagens utilize preparations containing certain types of collagen in a
ratio that reflects the composition of the tissue from
which the collagen was isolated. For example, a
commercial scale process has been developed for
the extraction of collagen from bovine hides [7].
Tissues
Type I
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
Type
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
XI
XII
XIII
XIV
XV
XVI
XVII
XVIII
XIX
XX XXV
1549
1550
2. Recombinant collagens
Recombinant collagens have been produced by
transfected mammalian cells [20 25], insect cells
[26 30], yeast [31 36], Escherichia coli [37], transgenic tobacco [38 41], mice [42,43], and silkworms
[44]. Of the various cell types evaluated, only mammalian cells transfected with a collagen gene and not
P4H genes expressed hydroxylated full-length collagens [26 30]. The level of expression achieved in
mammalian cells ranged from 0.6 to 20 mg/l, and up
to 40 mg/l was achieved in insect cells. However, this
level of expression is too low to make these systems
viable for commercial manufacturing. Furthermore,
the production cost of a cell culture process can be
5 10-fold higher than the fermentation process used
for other cell types, such as yeast or E. coli [45]. In all
other systems, a common problem encountered was
the inability of the host cells to provide sufficient P4H
activity to fully hydroxylate the expressed collagen. A
multigene expression technology has been developed
to co-express collagen and P4H and is described in
US patent 5,593,859 [19]. The use of Pichia pastoris
as a host for expression of recombinant collagen using
the multigene expression technology has been described by Vuorela et al. [34] and others [35,36].
2.1. Expression in yeast
Any collagen type can be expressed using the
multigene expression technology. For example, recombinant collagen types I IV, VII, IX, XIII, XV,
and XVIII have been expressed in P. pastoris with
P4H [34 36] (unpublished data). P. pastoris strains
for commercial production of recombinant human
type I, II, and III collagens have been selected based
Type I collagen
Type II collagen
Type III collagen
1.1
0.7
1.5
1551
1552
1553
Fig. 3. Analysis of triple helical structure and melting temperature by circular dichroism spectropolarimetry. Purified samples of recombinant
type I collagen (A, D), recombinant type III collagen (B, E), and bovine type I collagen (C, F) were diluted to 200 Ag/ml with 200 mM sodium
phosphate, pH 7.0. Aliquots of 200 Al were analyzed in 1-mm quartz cuvettes using a Jasco Model J-715 CD spectropolarimeter with a Peltier
controlled sample holder (Easton, MD). Samples were scanned over the wavelength range 190 250 nm, plotting molar ellipticity as a function
of wavelength (left side). Five scans were averaged for each sample. Melting temperature (Tm) analysis was performed by scanning from 15 to
65 jC at a scan rate of 1 jC/min and monitoring at 221 nm. The Tm was taken from the midpoints of the sigmoidal curves as determined using
Jasco Spectra Managerk software (right side).
Fig. 2. Size exclusion chromatography analysis of collagen. Approximately 50 Ag of recombinant human type I collagen (Panel A), recombinant
human type III collagen (Panel B), and bovine type I collagen (Panel C) were fractionated on a Bio-Sil SEC 400-5 column (3007.8 mm;
BioRad, Hercules, CA) in 2 M guanidine HCl at a flow rate of 1 ml/min and absorbance was monitored at 220 nm. Peaks areas were integrated
to determine the percent monomer (retention time 8.8 min) and oligomer (retention time 7.8 min or greater). The peak in Panel B eluting at 13.8
min corresponds to the included volume and contains the hME used to reduce the disulfide bonds in type III collagen.
1554
Table 3
Specifications for recombinant human type I collagen
Analytical assays
Specifications
Appearance (visual)/
solubility
pH
SDS PAGE with
reference standard
Western blot
Protein concentration
Fibrillogenesis
Hydroxyproline
Purity
Host cell protein
Host cell DNA
Bioburden
Endotoxin by LAL
Heavy metals
1555
Fig. 5. Co-expression of type III collagen and prolyl 4-hydroxylase subunits in tobacco cells. The expression of recombinant type III collagen
and the a and h subunits of prolyl 4-hydroxylase were demonstrated by Western blot analysis. Extracts from individual calli were run on 4
20% Tris glycine gels, transferred to PVDF membrane, and blotted with rabbit anti-human type III procollagen (Chemicon, AB764), P4H h
subunit and P4H a subunit antibodies (left panel). Recombinant type III collagen purified from cell extracts was subjected to amino acids
analysis (right panel). The results are expressed as number of residues per 1000 amino acids. P OHhydroxyproline; K OHhydroxylysine.
1556
remaining challenge would be to affect the specificity of hypdroxyproline incorporation and the authors
speculated this may be possible using genetic
approaches.
1557
Fig. 6. Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of recombinant human collagen type I (RhC I) sponge and bovine collagen I sponge (Instat,
Ethicon, Johnson & Johnson).
Fig. 7. Tissue response to subcutaneous-implanted (SQ) recombinant human collagen type I sponge and commercial bovine collagen
I sponge (Instat). Sponges (11 cm) were implanted into Wistar rats
subcutaneously. The implants were explanted 3 days after
implantation and examined histologically by H&E staining.
1558
Fig. 9. HUVEC attachment on DACRONR vascular graft coated with bovine type I collagen, recombinant human type III collagen (RhCII) or
no coating (control).
1559
5. Characteristics of gelatins
Gelatin is denatured collagen and is typically
isolated from bovine or porcine skin or bone by acid
or base extraction [88]. Regardless of the process
used, gelatin preparations consist of a distribution of
1560
A second approach to recombinant gelatin production is to intentionally direct the recombinant system
to generate a specified fragment of any selected
collagen a chain. Werten et al. [94] discusses the
Fig. 10. Schematic representation of recombinant human gelatin fragments expressed in P. pastoris (Panel A) and analysis by SDS PAGE
(Panel B). Panel A: Bars representing different recombinant human gelatin fragments indicate the relative location of the fragment within the
helical domain of the human a1 (I) chain, similarly colored bar share the same N-terminal sequence. The numbers to left of each bar represent
the calculated isoelectric point, based on the amino acid sequence. The numbers to the right of each bar indicate the number of amino acids in
the fragment. Panel B: Conditioned media from Pichia strains expressing various fragments were analyzed by SDS PAGE on a 10 20%
Tricine gel and stained with Gelcode blue. *Gelatin made by thermal hydrolysis from recombinant type I collagen expressed in P. pastoris.
1561
Specifications
Appearance (visual)/
solubility
SDS PAGE with
reference standard
Protein content
Purity-SDS gels/
densitometry
Host cell protein
Host cell DNA
Bioburden
Endotoxin by LAL
N-terminal sequence
Heavy metals
Moisture
1562
Fig. 11. Attachment of cultured Vero cells in vitro. Costar Maxi-adsorb 96-well plates were coated with 10 Ag of protein in carbonate buffer at
pH 10. Cells were added at 4104 per well and allowed to attach for 2 h at 37 jC. Plates were washed and incubated with WST-1 reagent
(Roche), and cell numbers were estimated by measuring optical density at 450 nm. Vit-bovine type I collagen (Vitrogen; Cohesion); BSA
bovine serum albumin used as a negative control; 10, 16, 25, 50, 62 kDacorresponds to the size of the gelatin fragment used to coat the wells.
1563
1564
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Elaine Lee for help
in preparation of this manuscript. This work was
funded in part by NIH grant R01 AR45879.
[16]
[17]
[18]
References
[1] W. Friess, Collagen-biomaterial for drug delivery, Eur. J.
Pharmacol. 54 (1998) 54113 54136.
[2] L. Lachman, H.A. Liverman, J.L. Kaing (Eds.), The Theory
and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy, Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, 1986.
[3] C.H. Lee, A. Singla, Y. Lee, Biomedical applications of
collagen, Int. J. Pharm. 221 (2001) 1 22.
[4] D.M. Asher, The transmissible spongiform encephalopathy
agents: concerns and responses of the United States regulatory agencies in maintaining the safety of biologics, Dev.
Biol. Stand. 100 (1999) 103 118.
[5] J.W. Wilesmith, J.B.M. Ryan, M.J. Atkinson, Bovine spongiform encephalopathy: epidemiological studies on the origin,
Vet. Rec. 128 (1991) 199 203.
[6] D.J. Prockop, K.I. Kivirikko, Collagens: molecular biology,
diseases, and potentials for therapy, Annu. Rev. Biochem. 64
(1995) 403 434.
[7] L. Cooperman, D. Michaeli, The immunogenicity of injectable collagen: I. A 1-year prospective study, J. Am. Acad.
Dermatol. 10 (1984) 638 646.
[8] K.I. Kivirikko, Collagen biosynthesis: a mini-review cluster,
Matrix Biol. 16 (1998) 355 356.
[9] M. Sakaguchi, S. Inouye, Systemic allergic reactions to gelatin included in vaccines as a stabilizer, Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 53
(2000) 189 195.
[10] M.P. Bernard, M.L. Chu, J.C. Meyers, F. Ramirez, E.F.
Eikenberry, D.J. Prockop, Nucleotide sequences of compli-
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
mentary deoxyribonucleic acids for the proa1 chain of human type I procollagen. Statistical evaluation of structures
that are conserved during evolution, Biochemistry 22 (1983)
213 223.
T. Shirai, S. Hattori, M. Sakaguchi, S. Inouye, A. Kimura, T.
Ebihara, S. Irie, Y. Nagai, H. Hori, The complete cDNA
coding sequence for the bovine proalpha2(I) chain of type
I procollagen, Matrix Biol. 17 (1998) 85 88.
W. de Wet, M. Bernard, V. Benson-Chanda, M.L. Chu, L.
Dickson, D. Weil, F. Ramirez, Organization of the human
pro-a2(I) collagen gene, J. Biol. Chem. 262 (1987) 32 36.
Zyderm Collagen Implant, Package Insert, Collagen Aesthetics (International), Palo Alto, CA, 2002.
H. Lindsley, M. Mannik, P. Bornstein, The distribution of
antigenic determinants in rat skin collagen, J. Exp. Med. 133
(1971) 1309 1324.
M. Sakaguchi, H. Hori, S. Hattori, S. Irie, A. Imai, M. Yanagida, H. Miyazawa, M. Toda, S. Inouye, IgE reactivity to
alpha1 and alpha2 chains of bovine type 1 collagen in children with bovine gelatin allergy, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.
104 (1999) 695 699.
J. Myllyharju, K.I. Kivirikko, Identification of a novel proline rich peptide-binding domain in prolyl 4-hydroxylase,
EMBO J. 18 (1999) 306 312.
E.J. Miller, S. Gay, The collagens: an overview and update,
Methods Enzymol. 82 (1982) 3 32.
R.A. Berg, D.J. Prockop, Thermal transition of a non-hydroxylated form of collagen. Evidence for a role for hydroxyproline in stabilizing the triple-helix of collagen, Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun. 52 (1973) 115 120.
D.J. Prockop, L. Ala-Kokko, A. Fertala, A. Sieron, K.I. Kivirikko, A. Geddis, T. Pihlajaniemi, inventors; Thomas Jefferson University and FibroGen, assignees. Synthesis of
human procollagens and collagens in recombinant DNA systems. US Patent 5 593 859. January 14, 1997.
A.E. Geddis, D.J. Prockop, Expression of human COL1A1
gene in stably transfected HT1080 cells, Matrix 13 (1993)
399 405.
A. Fertala, A.L. Sieron, A. Ganguly, S.W. Li, L. Ala-Kokko,
K.R. Anumula, D.J. Prockop, Synthesis of recombinant human procollagen II in a stably transfected tumor cell line
(HT1080), Biochem. J. 298 (1994) 31 37.
A. Fichard, E. Tillet, F. Delacoux, R. Garrone, F. Ruggiero,
Human recombinant a1(V) collagen chain-homotrimeric assembly and subsequent processing, J. Biol. Chem. 272 (1997)
30083 30087.
S. Frischholz, F. Beier, I. Girkontaite, K. Wagner, E. Poschl,
J. Turnay, U. Mayer, K. von der Mark, Characterization of
human type X procollagen and its NC-1 domain expressed as
recombinant proteins in HEK293 cells, J. Biol. Chem. 273
(1998) 4547 4555.
M. Chen, F.K. Costa, C.R. Lindvay, Y.-P. Han, D.T. Woodley, The recombinant expression of full-length type VII collagen and characterization of molecular mechanisms
underlying dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, J. Biol. Chem.
277 (2002) 2118 2124.
E. Tillet, H. Wiedemann, R. Golbik, T.-C. Pan, R.-Z. Zhang,
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
[39]
[40]
[41]
[42]
[43]
[44]
[45]
[46]
[47]
1565
1566
[48]
[49]
[50]
[51]
[52]
[53]
[54]
[55]
[56]
[57]
[58]
[59]
[60]
[61]
[62]
[63]
[64]
[65]
[93]
[94]
[95]
[96]
[97]
[98]
[99]
[100]
[101]
[102]
[103]
[104]
1567
Nakayama, Non-antigenic and low allergenic gelatin produced by specific digestion with an enzyme-coupled matrix,
Biol. Pharm. Bull. 21 (1998) 330 334.
R.W. Moskowitz, Role of collagen hydrolysate in bone and
joint disease, Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 30 (2000) 87 99.
M.W.T. Werten, T.J. van den Bosch, R.D. Wind, H. Mooibroek, F.A. de Wolf, High-yield secretion of recombinant
gelatins by Pichia pastoris, Yeast 15 (1999) 1087 1096.
E.C. de Bruin, F.A. de Wolf, N.C. Lane, Expression and
secretion of human alpha 1 (I) procollagen fragment by Hansenula polymorpha as compared to Pichia pastoris, Enzyme
Microb. Technol. 26 (2000) 640 644.
E.C. de Bruin, M.W.T. Werten, C. Laane, F.A. de Wolf,
Endogenous prolyl 4-hydroxylation in Hansenula polymorpha and its use for the production of hydroxylated recombinant gelatin, FEMS Yeast Res. 1 (2002) 291 298.
A.J. Brake, J.P. Merryweather, D.G. Coit, U.A. Heberlein,
F.R. Masiarz, G.T. Mullenbach, M.S. Urdea, P. Valenzuela, P.
Barr, Alpha-factor-directed synthesis and secretion of mature
foreign proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81 (1984) 4642 4646.
M.W.T. Werten, W.H. Wisselink, T.J. Jansen-van den Bosch,
E.C. de Bruin, F.A. de Wolf, Secreted production of a custom-designed, highly hydrophilic gelatin in Pichia pastoris,
Protein Eng. 14 (2001) 447 454.
I. Goldberg, A.J. Salerno, T. Patterson, J.I. Williams, Cloning
and expression of a collagen-analog-encoding synthetic gene
in Escherichia coli, Gene 80 (1989) 305 314.
H. Hori, S. Hattori, S. Inouye, A. Kimura, S. Irie, H.
Miyazawa, M. Sakaguchi, Analysis of the major epitope of
the a2 chain of bovine type I collagen in children with bovine gelatin allergy, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 110 (2002)
652 657.
T. Nakagawa, P. Pawelek, F. Grimmel, Extracellular matrix
organization modulates fibroblast growth and growth factor
responsiveness, Exp. Cell Res. 182 (1989) 572 582.
S.L. Schor, Cell proliferation and migration on collagen substrata in vitro, J. Cell Sci. 41 (1980) 159 175.
D. Carey, Control of growth and differentiation of vascular
cells by extracellular matrix proteins, Annu. Rev. Physiol. 53
(1991) 161 177.
B. Montagnon, J.C. Vincent-Falquet, B. Fanget, Thousand
litre scale microcarrier culture of Vero cells for killed polio
virus vaccine: promising results, Dev. Biol. Stand. 55 (1984)
37 38.