Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 15

Case 3:15-cv-00047-BR

Document 1

Filed 01/09/15

Page 1 of 15

Robert T. Cruzen, OSB 080167 Email: rob.cruzen@klarquist.com James E. Geringer, OSB 951783 Email: james.geringer@klarquist.com Kristen L. Reichenbach, OSB 115858 Email: kristen.reichenbach@klarquist.com KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP 121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600 Portland, Oregon 97204 Telephone: 503-595-5300 Facsimile: 503-595-5301

Attorneys for Plaintiff Williston Financial Group LLC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

PORTLAND DIVISION

WILLISTON FINANCIAL GROUP LLC, a Delaware Company,

v.

Plaintiff,

OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Minnesota Corporation,

Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-cv-00047

COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Case 3:15-cv-00047-BR

Document 1

Filed 01/09/15

Page 2 of 15

Plaintiff Williston Financial Group LLC (“Plaintiff” or “WFG”) for its Complaint for

Trademark Infringement against Defendant Old Republic National Title Insurance Company

(“Defendant” or “Old Republic”) states and alleges as follows:

INTRODUCTION

1. This is a classic case of trademark predation in the world of electronic advertising.

Defendant Old Republic has deliberately used Plaintiff’s famous “WFG” trademark and name to

sell directly competing services, by running an advertisement that uses WFG’s name and

federally registered trademark in a manner that is certain to cause confusion and mistake among

consumers in Oregon and elsewhere.

PARTIES

2. Plaintiff WFG is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of

business at 12909 SW 68th Parkway, Suite 350, Portland, OR 97223. WFG conducts business in

this District.

3. Upon information and belief, Defendant Old Republic is a Minnesota corporation

organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota with its principal place of

business at 400 Second Ave. S, Minneapolis, MN 55401.

4. Upon information and belief, Defendant owns, maintains, and operates the

website http://www.oldrepublictitle.com, through which Defendant markets and promotes its title

insurance services for sale in this District.

5. Upon information and belief, Defendant directs its advertising toward this

District, where it transacts business through or as “Old Republic Title Company of Oregon.”

Upon information and belief, Defendant owns and controls Old Republic Title Company of

COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT

Page 1

Case 3:15-cv-00047-BR

Document 1

Filed 01/09/15

Page 3 of 15

Oregon, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Oregon with its

principal place of business at 1 Southwest Columbia Street, Suite 560, Portland, OR 97258.

JURISDICTION

6. This action arises under the Trademark Laws of the United States, 15 U.S.C. §

1051 et seq. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over WFG’s claims pursuant to 15 U.S.C.

§ 1121(a) and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338.

7. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant because the claims against

Defendant arise from activity Defendant has directed toward residents of this District. Upon

information and belief, Defendant has engaged in substantial and not isolated activities within

the State of Oregon by selling and/or offering title insurance and related services in Oregon

through Old Republic Title Company of Oregon and/or Defendant’s website, including through

use of the infringing advertisement detailed herein.

BACKGROUND FACTS

8. WFG is the sole owner of the following U.S. trademark registrations (among

others):

 

Trademark

Registration Number

Issue Date

 

WFG

4,372,515

July 23, 2013

WFG TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY

   

A

WILLISTON FINANCIAL GROUP COMPANY & design

4,376,456

July 30, 2013

WFG NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY

   

A

WILLISTON FINANCIAL GROUP COMPANY & design

4,376,455

July 30, 2013

WFG NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A WILLISTON FINANCIAL GROUP COMPANY & design

4,379,546

August 6, 2013

COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT

Page 2

Case 3:15-cv-00047-BR

Document 1

Filed 01/09/15

Page 4 of 15

Trademark

Registration Number

Issue Date

WFG & design

4,379,540

August 6, 2013

WFG & design

4,362,002

July 2, 2013

WFG TITLE ADVISOR PRESENTED BY WFG NATIONAL TITLE & design

4,395,372

September 3, 2013

WFG TITLE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA A WILLISTON FINANCIAL GROUP COMPANY & design

4,500,945

March 25, 2014

These marks are sometimes collectively referred to herein as the “Federally Registered WFG

marks” or as “the WFG marks.”

9. WFG has used the mark “WFG” (Registration No. 4,372,515) in commerce in

connection with title insurance services (among other services) since at least January 1, 2010.

WFG continues to use the mark “WFG” in commerce in connection with title insurance services

among other services.

10. WFG has used the marks of Registration No. 4,379,546 and No. 4,376,455 (for

“WFG NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY A WILLISTON FINANCIAL GROUP

COMPANY” and “WFG NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY A WILLISTON FINANCIAL

GROUP COMPANY,” respectively) in commerce in connection with title insurance services

(among other services) since June 18, 1974. WFG continues to use these marks in commerce in

connection with title insurance services among other services.

11. WFG has used the mark of Registration No. 4,376,456 (“WFG TITLE

INSURANCE COMPANY A WILLISTON FINANCIAL GROUP COMPANY”) in commerce

in connection with title insurance services (among other services) since at least January 1, 2010.

COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT

Page 3

Case 3:15-cv-00047-BR

Document 1

Filed 01/09/15

Page 5 of 15

WFG continues to use this mark in commerce in connection with title insurance services among

other services.

12. WFG has used, and continues to use, in commerce in connection with the sale of

its title insurance and other services, the following trade names (among others): “WFG,” “WFG

Title,” “WFG Title Insurance.” These trade names are sometimes collectively referred to herein

as “WFG’s trade names.”

13. WFG has used, and continues to use, the WFG marks and WFG’s trade names on

its website, http://national.wfgnationaltitle.com, in connection with its sale and promotion of title

insurance services among other services.

14. WFG has expended considerable time, effort, and money to promote the WFG

marks and WFG’s trade names in connection with title insurance services among other services.

As a result of these efforts, and the substantial and continuous use of these marks and trade

names by WFG, consumers of such services in this District and elsewhere associate the WFG

marks and WFG’s trade names with WFG.

15. WFG has acquired valuable goodwill in connection with its services. This

goodwill is associated with the WFG marks and with WFG’s trade names.

16. Upon information and belief, using Google’s “AdWords” program, Defendant has

caused the following advertisement to appear (the red oval has been added to aid the reader).

This advertisement is referred to herein as “Defendant’s WFG Ad.” (See also Ex. A.)

COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT

Page 4

Case 3:15-cv-00047-BR

Document 1

Filed 01/09/15

Page 6 of 15

Case 3:15-cv-00047-BR Document 1 Filed 01/09/15 Page 6 of 15 17. As shown above, Defendant’s WFG

17. As shown above, Defendant’s WFG Ad appears at the top of Google search

results when a consumer searching for WFG’s title services enters the phrase “wfg title” into the

Google search box.

18. Defendant’s WFG Ad prominently displays, at the top of the ad, a hyperlinked

phrase: “WFG Title Insurance – OldRepublicTitle.com.” Below the hyperlinked phrase “WFG

Title Insurance – OldRepublicTitle.com,” the ad lists the website “www.oldrepublictitle.com/”

and the statements “Find the Right Title Insurance for you. Talk to a Representative!” The

bottom line of Defendant’s WFG Ad includes the following four hyperlinks: “The Company,”

“Careers,” “History” and “Strengths.”

19. Clicking on the hyperlinked phrase “WFG Title Insurance –

OldRepublicTitle.com” directs the Internet browser to the domain www.oldrepublictitle.com.

Specifically, the Internet browser is directed to a web page with an address that begins:

www.oldrepublictitle.com/landingpages/custom-quote-google

herein as the “Old Republic landing page.”

COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT

This page is referred to

Page 5

Case 3:15-cv-00047-BR

Document 1

Filed 01/09/15

Page 7 of 15

20. The screenshot below shows a portion of an Old Republic landing page that is

displayed when the hyperlinked phrase “WFG Title Insurance – OldRepublicTitle.com” in

Defendant’s WFG Ad is clicked. (See also Ex. B (Exhibit B includes a copy of the full page).)

also Ex. B (Exhibit B includes a copy of the full page).) 21. The Old Republic

21. The Old Republic landing page includes an advertisement for title insurance and a

form for requesting a “custom quote.” The form can be filled out and submitted online “to an

Old Republic Title rep.” The landing page prominently displays Defendant’s name, “Old

Republic National Title Insurance Company,” in the upper left corner.

22. Clicking on the hyperlink “The Company” in Defendant’s WFG Ad directs the

browser to the following web page: http://www.oldrepublictitle.com/newnational/Index.asp?

gclid=COCzqMWNgMMCFVJhfgodEQUAgw.

COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT

Page 6

Case 3:15-cv-00047-BR

Document 1

Filed 01/09/15

Page 8 of 15

23. Clicking on the hyperlink “Careers” in Defendant’s WFG Ad directs the browser

to the following web page: http://www.oldrepublictitle.com/careers/?gclid=CP

UNrfgodPTQA1w.

3OaNgMMCF

24. Clicking on the hyperlink “History” in Defendant’s WFG Ad directs the browser

to the following web page: http://www.oldrepublictitle.com/newnational/about/index.asp?gclid=

CPCF1veNgMMCFY-VfgodclQAmA.

25. Clicking on the hyperlink “Strengths” in Defendant’s WFG Ad directs the

browser to the following web page: http://www.oldrepublictitle.com/newnational/about/

strengths.asp?gclid=COL29IaOgMMCFRFhfgodTFMAmA.

26. Upon information and belief, Defendant owns, maintains and operates the website

http://www.oldrepublictitle.com in connection with the sale of title insurance services.

27. The phrase “WFG Title Insurance” used in Defendant’s WFG Ad includes

WFG’s mark “WFG.” The phrase “WFG Title Insurance” used in Defendant’s WFG Ad also

includes WFG’s trade names “WFG,” “WFG Title” and “WFG Title Insurance.”

28. The phrase “WFG Title Insurance” used in Defendant’s WFG Ad is confusingly

similar to the WFG marks and/or to WFG’s trade names.

29. Defendant’s WFG Ad uses the phrase “WFG Title Insurance –

OldRepublicTitle.com.” This use juxtaposes WFG’s trade name with Defendant’s website

www.oldrepublictitle.com. The positioning of WFG’s trade name separated from Defendant’s

website by a hyphen creates the impression in the consumer viewing Defendant’s WFG Ad that

WFG and Defendant are affiliated, connected or otherwise associated, and/or that WFG sponsors

or approves of Defendant’s services.

COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT

Page 7

Case 3:15-cv-00047-BR

Document 1

Filed 01/09/15

Page 9 of 15

30. Defendant’s WFG Ad uses the phrase “WFG Title Insurance –

OldRepublicTitle.com” as a hyperlink that directs the consumer to a website promoting and

marketing Defendant’s services. The linking of WFG’s trade name to Defendant’s website

creates the impression in the consumer viewing Defendant’s WFG Ad that WFG and Defendant

are affiliated, connected or otherwise associated, and/or that WFG sponsors or approves of

Defendant’s services.

31. Defendant’s WFG Ad uses the phrase “The Company” as a hyperlink that directs

the consumer to a website promoting and marketing Defendant’s services. The use of “The

Company,” in singular form, under the title “WFG Title Insurance – OldRepublicTitle.com,”

mistakenly suggests that WFG and Defendant are associated.

32. The inclusion of the phrase “The Company” in Defendant’s WFG Ad causes a

consumer viewing Defendant’s WFG Ad to be confused, mistaken or deceived as to whether

“The Company” refers to WFG and/or Defendant, and/or whether WFG and Defendant are

otherwise affiliated, connected or otherwise associated, and/or whether WFG sponsors or

approves of Defendant’s services.

33. Defendant’s WFG Ad is used in connection with the same kind of services as

WFG: namely, title insurance services. Defendant’s use of WFG’s trade name and the “WFG”

mark in the ad is likely to cause confusion and mistake because the associated services are of the

same kind.

34.

Defendant’s WFG Ad targets consumers searching for “wfg title.” Defendant’s

WFG Ad targets the same class of consumers as WFG when using the WFG marks and WFG’s

trade names. Defendant’s use of the ad is to market to the consumers interested in buying title

insurance services from WFG.

COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT

Page 8

Case 3:15-cv-00047-BR

Document 1

Filed 01/09/15

Page 10 of 15

35. Defendant’s use of WFG’s trade names and the “WFG” mark in the ad is likely to

cause confusion, mistake, and/or deception—including but not limited to initial confusion,

mistake and deception—of consumers, potential consumers, and others as to the affiliation,

connection or association of WFG with Defendant, and infringes WFG’s trade name and/or

WFG’s mark.

36. Consumers, potential consumers, and others are likely, at least initially, to believe

that Defendant’s website and associated services are sponsored by, or affiliated with, or

approved by, WFG.

37. Upon information and belief, Defendant’s WFG Ad is, and has been, displayed to

consumers at least throughout the United States in response to a search for “wfg title” using the

Google search engine since at least as early as December 4, 2014.

38. Defendant has had constructive notice of the registration of the WFG marks since

the date of issuance of each such registration.

39. Upon information and belief, Defendant had actual knowledge of WFG’s trade

names, including at least “WFG,” “WFG Title” and “WFG Title Insurance,” at the time

Defendant adopted and began using the ad.

40. Upon information and belief, Defendant does not have a federal trademark

registration for “WFG,” “WFG Title,” or “WFG Title Insurance” alone or in combination with

any other word or phrase.

41. Defendant’s use of WFG’s trade names and WFG’s mark “WFG” or any

confusingly similar name or mark is unauthorized by WFG.

42. Upon information and belief, Defendant has profited from its wrongful acts.

COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT

Page 9

Case 3:15-cv-00047-BR

Document 1

Filed 01/09/15

Page 11 of 15

43. Upon information and belief, Defendant adopted and used WFG’s mark and name

in commerce with the willful intent to trade off of WFG’s goodwill and reputation by associating

Defendant’s website www.oldrepublictitle.com and Defendant’s title insurance services with

WFG’s title insurance services to create a likelihood of consumer confusion in the marketplace.

44. Upon information and belief, Defendant intentionally wrote the WFG Ad in a

manner that would cause consumer confusion, mistake or deception as to the affiliation,

connection or association of WFG with Defendant, and/or as to the sponsorship or approval of

Defendant’s services by WFG. The WFG Ad author meant to use WFG’s name and mark to

cause mistake and confusion so that Defendant would win customers from its competitor WFG.

COUNT I

Violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1114

45. WFG incorporates by reference each of the foregoing allegations.

46. Defendant’s acts violate 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1).

47. The WFG marks listed above are distinctive and owned exclusively by WFG.

48. Defendant has used and continues to use the mark “WFG” in the accused

advertisement in connection with the sale, offering for sale, and advertising of Defendant’s title

insurance services, which are identical or nearly identical to the services listed in WFG’s Federal

Registration of the “WFG” mark.

49. Defendant’s unauthorized use of the “WFG” mark in the accused advertisement is

likely to cause confusion, mistake or deception as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or

approval of the services of Defendant because others are likely to believe Defendant’s services in

some way are connected with, sponsored by, licensed by, affiliated with, or otherwise associated

with WFG.

COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT

Page 10

Case 3:15-cv-00047-BR

Document 1

Filed 01/09/15

Page 12 of 15

50. Defendant’s activities constitute an infringement of WFG’s federally registered

“WFG” mark in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1).

51. The phrase “WFG Title Insurance” used in the accused advertisement is

confusingly similar to the WFG marks.

52. Defendant has used and continues to use the phrase “WFG Title Insurance” in the

accused advertisement in connection with the sale, offering for sale, and advertising of

Defendant’s title insurance services, which are identical or nearly identical to the services listed

in WFG’s Federal Registrations of the WFG marks.

53. Defendant’s unauthorized use of the phrase “WFG Title Insurance” in the accused

advertisement is likely to cause confusion, mistake or deception as to the source, sponsorship,

affiliation, or approval of the services of Defendant because others are likely to believe

Defendant’s services in some way are connected with, sponsored by, licensed by, affiliated with,

or otherwise associated with WFG.

54. Defendant’s activities constitute an infringement of one or more of the Federally

Registered WFG marks in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1).

55. Upon information and belief, Defendant knowingly and intentionally engaged in

the infringement of one or more of the Federally Registered WFG marks.

56. Upon information and belief, Defendant’s activities are likely to damage WFG’s

reputation and goodwill among consumers and to divert sales and opportunities away from WFG

and to Defendant.

57. Upon information and belief, Defendant’s acts of infringement have caused and,

unless enjoined, will continue to cause WFG to sustain monetary damages, loss, and injury in an

amount to be determined in this action.

COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT

Page 11

Case 3:15-cv-00047-BR

Document 1

Filed 01/09/15

Page 13 of 15

58. WFG is without an adequate remedy at law. Defendant’s use of the WFG marks

and/or any confusingly similar variation of the WFG marks has caused and/or is likely to cause

irreparable injury to WFG, and unless Defendant is enjoined by this Court, WFG will continue to

suffer irreparable injury.

COUNT II

Violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)

59. WFG incorporates by reference each of the foregoing allegations.

60. Defendant’s acts violate 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a).

61. The WFG marks listed above, and the trade names “WFG,” “WFG Title,” and

“WFG Title Insurance,” are distinctive and owned exclusively by WFG.

62. Defendant has used the trade name “WFG” and/or “WFG Title” and/or “WFG

Title Insurance” in connection with the sale of title insurance services, which are identical or

nearly identical to the services with which WFG has used the name.

63. Defendant is not authorized to use WFG’s trade name, marks or any confusingly

similar name or mark that implies that Defendant is in any way associated or affiliated with

WFG.

64. Defendant’s use of “WFG” and/or “WFG Title” and/or “WFG Title Insurance” in

the accused advertisement is likely to confuse consumers into believing that the services offered

by Defendant originated from, are authorized by, or are somehow affiliated with WFG.

65. Defendant’s use of the name “WFG” and/or “WFG Title” and/or “WFG Title

Insurance” in the accused advertisement is likely to cause confusion, mistake or deception as to

the source, sponsorship, affiliation or approval of the services of Defendant because others are

COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT

Page 12

Case 3:15-cv-00047-BR

Document 1

Filed 01/09/15

Page 14 of 15

likely to believe Defendant’s services in some way are connected with, sponsored by, licensed

by, affiliated with, or otherwise associated with WFG.

66. Upon information and belief, Defendant’s use of the name “WFG” and/or “WFG

Title” and/or “WFG Title Insurance” was made with actual knowledge of WFG’s rights in these

trade names.

67. Upon information and belief, Defendant knowingly and intentionally engaged in

the infringement of WFG’s trade name.

68. Upon information and belief, Defendant’s activities are likely to damage WFG’s

reputation and goodwill among consumers and to divert sales and opportunities away from WFG

and to Defendant.

69. Upon information and belief, Defendant’s acts of infringement have caused and,

unless enjoined, will continue to cause WFG to sustain monetary damages, loss, and injury in an

amount to be determined in this action.

70. WFG is without an adequate remedy at law. Defendant’s use of WFG’s trade

name “WFG” and/or “WFG Title” and/or “WFG Title Insurance” has caused and/or is likely to

cause irreparable injury to WFG, and unless Defendant is enjoined by this Court, WFG will

continue to suffer irreparable injury.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Williston Financial Group LLC prays for the following relief:

A. A judgment for WFG against Defendant on all claims of this Complaint;

B. A grant of preliminary and permanent injunction against Defendant and all

persons in active concert or participation with it, enjoining it from using WFG’s trade name,

COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT

Page 13

Case 3:15-cv-00047-BR

Document 1

Filed 01/09/15

Page 15 of 15

mark or any confusingly similar variation of WFG’s trade name or mark, in connection with title

insurance services;

C. A judgment awarding WFG compensatory damages as a result of Defendant’s

actions, together with interest and costs;

D. A judgment requiring Defendant to account for and pay to WFG all profits

wrongfully derived by Defendant through its unlawful acts set forth herein, together with interest

and costs;

E. An award to WFG of its costs (including expert fees), disbursements, and

reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred in this action, together with interest, including prejudgment

interest, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117 and the equity powers of this Court; and

F. Such other and further relief as may be deemed just and appropriate.

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 38(b), Plaintiff requests a trial by jury on all issues properly

triable by a jury.

Dated: January 9, 2015

COMPLAINT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT

Respectfully submitted,

By:

s/ Kristen L. Reichenbach

Robert T. Cruzen, OSB 080167 Email: rob.cruzen@klarquist.com James E. Geringer, OSB 951783 Email: james.geringer@klarquist.com Kristen L. Reichenbach, OSB 115858 Email: kristen.reichenbach@klarquist.com KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP 121 S.W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600 Portland, Oregon 97204 Telephone: 503-595-5300 Facsimile: 503-595-5301

Attorneys for Plaintiff Williston Financial Group LLC

Page 14