Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 2

1. Exh.ibit A : PDEA Office Order No.

2005-10-12 (Authenticated) To prove that during the


date of arrest and seizure, arresting officers were detailed with Bukidnon Provincial
Office by the PDEA to enforce Republic Act 9165.
2. Exhibit B: Mug Shot of Accused MARK ANTHONY C. GONZAGA taken in Malaybalay
City CIDG after arrest: To identify that the person pointed out by Confidential Informant
as selling drugs is the same person arrested by PNP MCPS
3. Exhibit C: Picture of Marked Money (2 pcs. 100.00 Bills) used in transaction together
with cellophanes of alleged marijuana leaves: 1. To prove that the transaction took
place as narrated by Witness; 2. To prove the identity of Marked Money and Drugs
recovered from Accused
4. Exhibit D: Joint Affidavit of Apprehension: To prove that the Accused was arrested in
accordance with the Chain of Custody required in Drug Cases
5. Exhibit E: Photo of Marked Money: To prove that the Marked Money used in the
transaction is the same money recovered from Accused
6. Exhibit F: Inventory Receipt (Issued 26 June 2007 in Malaybalay City): To prove that
the items mentioned therein were recovered from Accused
7. Exhibit G 1: Memorandum Request for Laboratory Examination of suspected
marijuana: 1. To prove that the items seized from Accused were the same items
subjected to Laboratory Examination; 2. To prove that law enforcement officers (a)
complied with the procedure prescribed by law after arrest of Accused and (b) within
the period of time prescribed by law
8. Exhibit G 2: Memorandum Request for Ultraviolet (UV) Powder Dusting of certain
100.00 Money Bills for use in buy-bust operations: To prove that the two (2) money bills
seized from Accused were Marked Money bills for use in buy-bust operations
9. Exhibit H 1: Sworn Chemical Test of Urine Sample from Accused (Chem. Rep. No.
DTCRIM-25-2007B): To prove the use of marijuana by Accused prior to arrest and
seizure
10. Exhibit H 2: Sworn Chemical Test Report of Contents of Transparent Plastic Bags
Containing Alleged marijuana seized from Accused (Chem. Rep. No. D-29-2007B): 1.
To prove that the items recovered from Accused were duly received by the Laboratory

Examiner upon prior request for examination by the PNP MCPS; 2. To prove that
transmittal of request, processing and testing was carried out by the Laboratory
Examiner within the period prescribed by law; 3. To prove that the items recovered
from Accused were marijuana leaves (qualitative test); 4. To prove that these were the
very same marijuana seized from Accused during the buy-bust operation; 5. To prove
the quantity thereof (quantitative test)
11. Exhibit H 3: Sworn Ultraviolet (UV) Radiation Test Report of Money Bills and Living
Person (Both Hands) of Accused MARK ANTHONY C. GONZAGA (Chem. Rep. No.
C-07-2007B): 1. To prove that the money recovered from Accused is the same money
previously Marked by entrapping officers before the transaction; 2. To prove that
Accused did receive such money in consideration of the sale of the drugs

Вам также может понравиться