Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Examiner upon prior request for examination by the PNP MCPS; 2. To prove that
transmittal of request, processing and testing was carried out by the Laboratory
Examiner within the period prescribed by law; 3. To prove that the items recovered
from Accused were marijuana leaves (qualitative test); 4. To prove that these were the
very same marijuana seized from Accused during the buy-bust operation; 5. To prove
the quantity thereof (quantitative test)
11. Exhibit H 3: Sworn Ultraviolet (UV) Radiation Test Report of Money Bills and Living
Person (Both Hands) of Accused MARK ANTHONY C. GONZAGA (Chem. Rep. No.
C-07-2007B): 1. To prove that the money recovered from Accused is the same money
previously Marked by entrapping officers before the transaction; 2. To prove that
Accused did receive such money in consideration of the sale of the drugs