Ghar Vapasi and Dealers in falsehood Part #1

Elite member of IM (Intellectuals Mafia) wrote an article condemning recent event of

Ghar Vapasi. Yes such sort of event must be condemned by every Indian; but before
that we must go into depth of entire Ghar Vapasi row. Author quoted Vivekanand Ji
to Gandhi Ji in order to abuse Hinduism in the country. He also went on to say that
that Ambedkar left Hinduism with announcement that -- I was born a Hindu, that
was not in my hands, but I will not die a Hindu.Debate over conversion going in this
from so long that these IM failed to find that the various Hindu organization they are
abusing for conversion issue are the one who were demanding anti-conversion law
throughout the country and when from the floor of the house distinguish member
of parliament proposed anti-conversion law it was Christian organization which was
not in favor of the anti-conversion law
Selective Quotes of Babasaheb
IM(Intellectuals mafia) are in habit of quoting greatest personalities of land
selectively.
Author also mentioned that In the debate the word used is converting others.
Where is the place for people volunteering and adopting another religion, like
Ambedkar and so many others?
If author discussion the grave danger of conversion in this country and if he is
quoting the Babasaheb then he must also discuss Why Babasaheb didnt converted
to Christianity of Islam?
Dr. Ambedkar writes: "Indian Christians like all other Indians are divided by race, by
language and by caste. Their religion has not been a sufficiently unifying force as to
make difference of language, race and caste as though they were mere distinctions.
On the contrary, their religion which is their own cement is infected with
denominational differences. The result is that Indian Christians are too disjointed to
have a common aim, to have a common mind, and to put a common endeavour."
Source:- DC Ahir: Why Dr. Ambedkar rejected Christainity; B;lumoon Books; P. 66
Babasaheb even stated that conversion to Christianity or Islam means denationalization of the depressed. After his proclamation to left Hinduism, Nizam of
Hyderbad offered him money to convert to Islam along with his followers.
"If the depressed classes embrace Christianity or Islam they not go out of the Hindu
religion, but also they go out of the Indian culture. Conversion to Christianity or
Islam would de-nationalise the depressed classes", he said.
Source:- Dnahanjay Keer,: Dr. Ambedkar, Life and Mission, Bombay, 1954, p.270 :
The Times of India, Bombay, 24 July, 1936

Babasaheb stated about the fall of Buddhism in India although something else has
been circulated by ISI (Indian Secular Intellectuals) regarding fall of Buddhism in
India; but that is different story altogether we will stick to conversion issue in India.
Dr. BR Ambedkar writes, There is no doubt that the fall of Buddhism in India was
due to the invasions of the Musalmans. Islam came out as the enemy of the But.
The word But as everybody knows is an Arabic word and means an idol. Not many
people however know what the derivation of the word But is. But is the Arabic
corruption of Buddha. Thus the origin of the word indicates that in the Muslim mind
idol worship had come to be identified with the religion of the Budhha.On the issue
of destruction of Buddhist monasteries he writes, The Musalman invaders sacked
the Budhhist Universities of Nalanda, Vikramasila, Jagaddala, Odantapuri to name
only a few. They razed to the ground Budhhist monasteries with which the country
was studded.Babasaheb further writes, Such was the slaughter of the Budhhist
priesthood perpetrated by the Islamic invaders. The axe was struck at the very root.
For by killing the Budhhist priesthood Islam killed Budhhism.
Source:- Ahir, DC; Dr. Ambedkar on Islam; Chap II; Muslim Onslaught on Budhhism;
P. 17, Quoted from Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches, Unpublished
Writings, Bombay, 1987 and P. 21

Lokmanya Tilak to DNA studies and Aryan Invasion theory

Author wrote How is ancestry important in ones faith and the citizenship today? Do

we have to trace our ancestry to decide todays faith? Where will this lead us?The
theory of evolution apart the latest DNA studies show that humans beginning is
from South Africa. The coming of Aryans to India from Arctic zone (Lokmanya Tilak )
to that Aryans were original inhabitants of India is a perpetual debate, with more
heat than light in it.
Author quoted that Humans beginning from Africa and we are indigenous people of
this land is perpetual debate but the author who is pointing towards DNA studies of
some sort fails to go through the latest research of Cellular and Molecular biology
centre Hyderabad.
As per researcher The study effectively puts to rest the argument that south
Indians are Dravidians and were driven to the peninsula by Aryans who invaded
North India, said Prof Singh, a molecular biologist and former chief of Centre for
Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad.

Even Babasaheb rejected this theory Babasaheb as Ambedkar was popularly

known as wrote: The theory of invasion is an invention. This invention is necessary
because of a gratuitous assumption that the Indo-Germanic people are the purest of
the modern representation of the original Aryan race. The theory is perversion of
scientific investigation. It is not allowed to evolve out of facts. On the contrary, the
theory is preconceived and facts are selected to prove it. It falls to the ground at
every point.

Nationalism vs Secularism and RSS

Author said three types Nationalisms competed with each others during freedom
struggle; but author failed to explain why Muslim Nationalism shaped up in this
country during the freedom struggle? Dear author it is ISI circle which created divide
amongst the society and used RSS as anti-Muslim agent in order to foster your own
vested interest.
Let me quote Fazle Ahmed which throws light over Indian Secularism (author fails to
understand that version of Indian Nationalism as per his perception is infested
Secularism which never wants country to be united).
In his book My eleven years with Fakhrudin Ali Ahmed, Mr. Fazle Ahmed
Rehmaney provides an interesting case which throws great light on the psychology
of secularism. During the Emergency days, when members of the Jamat-e-Islami
were put in the same jail as the members of the RSS, the former began to discover
that the latter were no monsters as they were made to believe by nationalist
propaganda; therefore they began to think better of their Hindu brothers. This sent
alarm into the heart of their secularists and nationalists. Maulavis belonging to
Jamait-Ul-Ulema-e-Hind met the President and reported to him about the growing
rapport between the leaders of the two communities. This stunned the President
and he said that this carried two ominous future for Congresite Muslim leaders.
He also promised that he would speak to Indiraji about this dangerous
development and ensure that Muslims remain Muslim
Missionaries Conversion
Author try to state in his article that there are few cases of missionaries conversions
in Indian and by and large most of them are voluntarily. But author fails to explain
from Niyogi Commission to forced conversions in India.
Let us look into Niyogi Commission to conversion in North-East (Just one case) from
discussion point of view; though there are hundreds of such case studies.
Will seculars ever debate Niyogi Commission report?

The committee gave the following recommendations:

Those missionaries whose primary objective is proselytisation should be

asked to withdraw, and the large influx of foreign missionaries should be
checked;

The use of medical and other professional services as a direct means of

making conversions should be prohibited by law;

Attempts to convert by force or fraud or material inducements, or by taking

advantage of a persons inexperience or confidence or spiritual weakness or
thoughtlessness, or by penetrating into the religious conscience of persons
for the purpose of consciously altering their faith, should be absolutely
prohibited;

The Constitution of India should be amended in order to rule out propagation

by foreigners and conversions by force, fraud and other illicit means;

Legislative measures should be enacted for controlling conversion by illegal

means;

Rules relating to registration of doctors, nurses and other personnel

employed in hospitals should be suitably amended to provide a condition
against evangelistic activities during professional service;

Circulation of literature meant for religious propaganda without approval of

the State Government should be prohibited.

(Goel 1998, 163-164)

Will Seculars ever question the religious conversion in North-east?
Now let us check the facts regarding religious conversion by allurement and
inducement. During 1991-2001 period Christianity and Islam grew rapidly in North
Eastern part of the country. The North-Eastern states of India have witnessed
exponential growth in the population of Christians as well as Muslims. Assam
predominately became Muslim, and Nagaland, Mizoram and Manipur turned
predominantly Christian. We also saw the decadal growth of Hindus as well as
Buddhist in the northeast states.

Between 1991-2001, there was 44.7% growth in Christian Population in

North-Eastern Region.

Assam is the most populated state of the northeast. In between 1991-2001,

there was 29.3% growth in Muslim Population and 32.5% in Christian
Population. An alarming fact is that the Buddhist population declined by
-20.3%.

There was decadal growth of Hindus in several districts of Assam, especially

in Bongaigaon, Dhubri, Kokrajhar, Barpeta, Nalbari and Darrang.

There was whopping 130.9% growth in Christian Population and 73.4%

growth in Muslim Population of Arunchal Pradesh.

There was 69.2% growth in Christian Population as well as 69.6% in Muslim

Population of Nagaland.

There was -5.2% decadal growth in Hindu population of Manipur. However, at

the same time, Christians grew by 36.6% and Muslims by 43.1%.

Mizoram recorded 122.5% growth in Muslims populations and 30.7% growth

in Christian population. However, at the same time, Hindus recorded decadal
growth of -9.3%.

Tripura recorded 120.5% growth in Christian Population and 29.5 percent

growth in Muslim population. However, Buddhist population recorded a
decadal growth of -22.9%.

Meghalaya recorded 42.1% growth in Christians population and Muslims

grew by 61.4%.

Northeastern states excluding Assam recorded 50.6% growth in Christians

and 42.4% growth in Muslims.

Source: Census Data 1991-2001.

In Kandhamal, kings see power shift to landless - Home - livemint.com

In 1991, there were 70,000 Christians in Kandhamal. By 2001, the number

had exploded 66% to 117,950.

Under the Orissa Freedom of Religion Act, all conversions have to be reported
to the district magistrate and collector.

"Once the collector makes sure that the conversion is not being done under
any pressure, the person is free to convert," says Krishnan Kumar, the
collector of Kandhamal. But this is almost never actually practised.

When the number of Christians grew by almost 47,950, "only two were done
with the mandatory approval of the collector", Kumar said.

One reason conversions are not reported is because to do so means Panos

would lose scheduled caste statusand lose their allotment of reservations in
government jobs.

"Panos convert to Christianity without telling the government to get benefits

from missionaries. Then they use their SC certificate to get government jobs
as well..." says sub-collector Pradipta Kumar.

Some government officials say that the Kandhas, who make up 52% of the
population, own less than 10% of the district land. Others contest the figure
and say it is as high as 60%, but the exact data was unavailable.

Author in his personal bias failed to mention following evidence related to

Missionary conversion in India. He goes on to say that yes we have few events of
Christian conversions but by and large most of conversions are voluntarily. Dear
distinguish member of ISI (Indian Secular Intellectuals) or IM (Intellectuals Mafia)
can you please explain the Joshua Project and 10/40 Windows? I want to bring to
you kind attention the menace of missionaries conversion in this country. Presenting
missionaries conversion as voluntarily is misnomer. VK Shashikumar exposed
everything related to missionaries conversion issue in India, it also expose you
intellectual hypocrisy in a rejoinder titled Preparing for the harvest
A new mood of aggressive evangelism has been emanating from America. Wellfunded, superbly networked, backed by the highest of the land, seized of its moral
supremacy, it has India as one of its key targets, reveals VK Shashikumar in a
disturbing expos.
Quoting Vivekakand Ji out of Context
Author wrote concerned it took place mainly due to the caste oppression, as
pointed out by Swami Vivekananda and to prove his point he quoted
Vivekakand Ji out of context. Now let us analyses from where author picked up out
of context quote and what is the real context of Vivekanand Ji.
I am quoting full quote with the actual context of Vivekanand Ji so that reader
himself can decided the dishonestly of author.
Source of quotes is a letter Vivekakand ji wrote to Shri Haridas Viharidas Desai. I
urge my readers to read the entire letter and decided the context especially why
Hindus converted to Islam out o Hinduism.

But the Lord is great, the vengeance came sooner or later, and they who sucked the
life-blood of the poor, whose very education was at their expense, whose very
power was built on their poverty, were in their turn sold as slaves by hundreds and
thousands, their wives and daughters dishonoured, their property robbed for the
last 1,000 years, and do you think it was for no cause?
Why amongst the poor of India so many are Mohammedans? It is nonsense to say,
they were converted by the sword. It was to gain their liberty from the . . .
zemindars and from the . . . priest, and as a consequence you find in Bengal there
are more Mohammedans than Hindus amongst the cultivators, because there were
so many zemindars there. Who thinks of raising these sunken downtrodden
millions? A few thousand graduates do not make a nation, a few rich men do not
make a nation. True, our opportunities are less, but still there is enough to feed and
clothe and made 300 millions more comfortable, nay, luxurious. Ninety per cent of
our people are without education who thinks of that? these Babus, the socalled patriots?
Either embrace Islam or pay JIZYAH how secular wow?
After the advent of Islam in India the rulers offered Indian people either embrace
islam or pay JIZYAH though authors also claims that people converted to Islam due
to anticipation for reward by Muslim kings but fails to discuss JIZYAH IN INDIA and
Jizyah-collector.
QD Mughth ad-Dn told SulTn 'Al'u 'd-Dn Khalj: 'If the Jizyah-collector ask a
Hindu for silver, the latter should offer gold in all humility. If the collector wishes to
spit into his mouth, the latter should open his mouth without demur, so as to enable
the former to spit into it.
Source:- Diy' ad-Dn Baran, Tarkh-i Firozshhi, Sayyid Athar Abbas Rizwi, selected
Hindi tr., in his Khalj-Kalna Bhrata, Aligarh, 1955, p. 70.

HARSH NARAIN wrote Like everywhere else, in India, too, a large number
of non-Muslims chose Islam for fear of Jizyah. Froz Shh Tughluq promulgated an
ordinance imposing Jizyah on the Hindus including the BrhamaNa-s and exempting
them therefrom on conversion. He writes that as a result of the ordinance 'the
Hindus thronged in clusters after clusters and groups after groups and were glorified
by the glory of Islam. And likewise to this day of ours, they come from far and wide,
embrace Islam, and Jizyah is off from them.' (fawj fawj wa jam'at jam'at Hund
madand wa ba sharf-i Islm musharraf shudand. Wa hamchunn il yawmi-n
hdh az aTrf m yand, wa mn m rand, wa jizyah az Ishn dr m shawad.)

Source--Firoz Shah Tughluq, FuthHt-i Firozshh, ed. by Shaikh Abdur Rashid,

Aligarh, 1954, pp. 16-17.

(to be continued)