1

The Sociological Turmoil of Race, Ethnicity, & Tribe throughout the

Underdeveloped World
Omar Alansari-Kreger

What happens when an entire race is classified as undesirable by official

channels throughout much of the underdeveloped world? That undermined race
becomes easy to exploit because they are entirely defenseless. They are turned into
national enemies and serve as a common scapegoat for a marginalized societys
problematic woes. What doesnt immediately resonate is that a punitive policy that is
directed toward those that are racially undesirable does nothing to solve the greater
issue at hand which specifically concerns itself with a humanitarian predicament. Those
that preserve the scapegoat culture necessitate a vulnerable target so that they can
cause great ruin to the latter by imposing a blockade on and around them; however,
once enforced, how is it possible to effectively assist the state of an undermined race
when it and those undermining it are deprived of the simplest infrastructure?
Policies that fend off inclusion into the norm obsess over elite ideas of exclusivity.
It isnt possible to embark on a fresh start if the sociological variable in question is
prevented from turning that page into a new realm. Among underdeveloped nations, a
heavier investment made under the banner of racist gentrification ignores the greater
issue at hand simply because those in power consider that rivaled group to be nothing
but a second class sideshow to its own agenda. Perhaps that explains why equal
opportunity means nothing to chauvinists that amplify themselves through petty forms of
jingoism at the highest levels of government; that describes a rising trend throughout
much of the Western mainstream. Whether in the developed or underdeveloped worlds,
that principle alone is the source of the greatest atrocity which is actually an example of
cruel and unusual punishment.
It is ceaselessly amazing to observe just how fundamentally obtuse the
worldviews of so many billions are in a planet that has saturated itself with diversified
channels of information. Racist bigotry will always exist irrespective of the information
that is readily made available to any one of us; nonetheless, a population that is
marginalized by its adversaries in power adopts policies which keep it at a disadvantage
which reinforces racial negativism and as a result effectively keeps its members in a
downtrodden state. Populations that squander in their own misery take refuge behind
ideas of gentrified race; when one group is able to gain leverage over another
adversarial rival a pathological vacuum for power is born. The pursuit of its source
becomes a cultural obsession and transforms into a highly sought after currency that
brings out our worst qualities as a species.

Regional resource scarcity is curbed into the corner of that racial/ethnic group
wielding localized power and it is blindly thought that what they are affords a preferential
advantage over an adversary. Sociologically, both groups are engaged in a system that
is fashioned on the winner takes all analogy. We have just described the circumstantial
situation of the developmentally challenged world. Racial/ethnic rivalries bring us to the
source of internalized turmoil and when one group goes too far it isnt long until a civil
war breaks out. That is a trend which is all too familiar to continental Africa. Deep within
nations of underdeveloped turmoil, raw material resources are horded as forms of
capital and are sold out of a marginalized interest to provide one racial, tribal, or ethnic
group with an upper hand advantage over an adversarial enemy it is fighting all in its
own backyard.
A pattern of blind illiteracy keeps this cycle in place and becomes part of a
common way of life where everyday people are coerced together through schemes of
sociological coercion while trying to derive a living. Sociological creed, defined as racial,
tribal, and ethnic affinities, are prone to exploitation by diabolical power mongers that
use race and ethnicity as poisonous demarcation lines. The latter serves as a uniformed
source of turmoil for the underdeveloped world. When economic depravity joins forces
with sociological score settling, as described within the three previously stated
categories, an entire nation is deprived of a common livelihood for all because channels
of diversity are used as anchors of diabolical stagnation; each individual anchor leaves
us with some kind of internal abomination which keeps an underdeveloped nation in a
state of turmoil.
Thus, the diversity of an underdeveloped nations sociological affinity is used
against it firmly keeping it exposed and vulnerable. That is why the underdeveloped
world continues to remain ripe for the economically globalized taking by developed
powers and interests. It should be blatantly obvious to us all, independence never really
happened throughout much of the underdeveloped world which keeps each nation
within it as some kind of lauded economic serf. How is that any different than
colonialism? Do recognized formalities of independence create sovereign equality
among nations?
The end of colonial Europe argues against the logic of the previous question. An
empowered generation should facilitate its own thinking on such a massive issue if it
hopes to curb the traditional turmoil of the underdeveloped world.