Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
On time Deliverys
Quality
The evaluation of quality and time program is joint vendorbuying house activity, and when properly accomplished, is
mutually beneficial for all parties concerned.
Lead time,
No. Of machines
The buyer
Buyer
Buying Office
Vendor
RESEARCH GRID
RESEARCH RESEARCH
OBJECTIVES
DESIGN
To understand
the process of Exploratory
evaluating the
Vendors in
buying office
DATA
COLLECION
METHODS
Primary
(Interview)
(QA & Sr.
Merchants)
2 QA &
4 Senior
Triburg
Merchant
s
Theme
Gupta
Exim
To evaluate
the
performance of
different
Descriptive
Vendor using
Vendors Rating
methods.
Primary
(Inspection
Report &
Questionnaire)
RR
Trends
Shri
Laxmi
Dassan
Secondary
(Internet,
Articles,
Journals)
Delhi &
Gurgaon
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
To understand the process of auditing the Vendors in Triburg
To evaluate the performance of different Vendors using Vendor Rating
method
Choose No of Vendors may be A Class
For evaluating the 5 vendors on the below selected parameters of a
specific buyer (TK &TJ MAXX)
These vendors are ranked on following parameters
Facilities
Quality Control Systems
Incoming Material Inspection
In Process Quality Control
Baby wear product Specific
Communication, Document Control and Work Movement
RECOMMENDATION
Vendor evaluation is important as it can reduce supply chain costs
and improve the quality and timeliness of the delivery of items to
the company
Vendor performance has to be measured occasionally for the
following reasons
To increase performance visibility
To uncover and remove hidden waste and cost drivers in the supply
chain
To leverage the supply base
To align customer and supplier business practices
To mitigate risk
BENEFITS
Reducing the size of vendor matrix for better and long term business
relations
REFERENCES
Ainamo, D. a. (1999). The Coevolution of New Organizational forms
in the Fashion Industry. Retrieved April 2, 2013, from academia.edu:
http://www.academia.edu.
Alberto De Toni and Guido Nassimbeni (2001), 'A method for the
evaluation of suppliers co-design effort', International Journal of
Production Economics, 72, 169-180