Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1 of 7
http://www.sefindia.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=58226
www.sefindia.org
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING FORUM OF INDIA [SEFI]
Search
Share
Subscriptions
Follow @sefindia
66k
Digest Preferences
FAQ
Profile
Search
Memberlist
2,491 followers
Usergroups
Register
Security Tips
Donate
Log in
Warning: Make sure you scan the downloaded attachment with updated antivirus tools before opening them. They may contain viruses.
Use online scanners here and here to upload downloaded attachment to check for safety.
Message
Posted: Thu Jun 20, 2013 10:06 am
SEFI Member
Dear Sefins
As illustrated by krane hope so all doubt are cleared with respect to use of bracing rod in PEB. I
strongly propose to go through below mentioned references by krane and keep updated our self
with latest technology rather than blaming PEB manufactures.
Mr Krane I would like to say thanks for posting your view.
Joined: 20 Apr 2011
Posts: 7
20-01-2015 15:02
2 of 7
http://www.sefindia.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=58226
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:10 PM, ibarua forum@sefindia.org (forum@sefindia.org))> wrote:
Quote:
18th June 2013
Er Janakiraman has answered my question: PEB manufacturers sacrifice safety and stability for
the sake of saving a few kilos of steel in the X bracings. We should not allow them to get away
with such dodgy practices. When drawings up the specifications for PEB buildings, the correct
design procedure should be prescribed. The problem is that the building owners /clients often
take the side of the PEB vendors. I'm in the process of designing a manufacturing facility
where we shall be inviting tenders for a PEB. The tender shall be an item rate tender where
the vendor has to quote per square metre rates for the building frame, the roof sheeting, wall
cladding and the various other components. The design specs & standards shall be specified by
us. Let's see how PEB vendors react.
Indrajit Barua.
From: janakiraman
Sent: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 23:49:02
To: general@sefindia.org (general@sefindia.org) (general@sefindia.org
(general@sefindia.org))
Subject: [SEFI] Re: Bracing rods in PEB - slenderness
Dear ibarua Sir,
I had been working with consultants in India for 5 years and had been designing X-bracings
using angles and hot rolled channels etc..designed for both Tension and compression force.
Later I moved to PEB manufacturers and found that the X bracings can be designed as tension
only members using Rods, cables or angles. This way the economy of the structure is achieved
to a certain extent. At the same time PEB manufacturers claim that there is no compromise is
made on safety. I did not to agree this concept at all in the beginning. But it has been 7 years
with PEB manufacturers and supplying buildings which has been designed using the tension
only bracing concept. These buildings are standing to this date after sustaining occasional sand
storms in this middle east region.
This tension only bracing works for the same reason as explained by Mr. C. Channakeshava.
"They have to take up only tension while in compression they are supposed to buckle and
relieve the force. This is actually a nonlinear phenomenon and can be addressed by tension
only members of commercial software. Alternatively, knowing the direction of forces, the user
can actually remove the compression members and design the structure which is quite simple.
One thing to be remembered is that buckling "does not always lead to failure". The member
can still perform well in tension".
To all,
Just to share a thought that in general, PEB buildings in UAE rely on the diaphragm action
from a combination of roof struts along the lateral force's load path and tension bracings in
both walls and roof or portal bracings in wall and X bracings in roof.
Contradictory in the USA, most of the PEB companies take the diaphragm capacity of the
panels i.e. panel shear capacity to further economize the structure. But this idea will not
eliminate the presence of a strut member at the bracing break locations.
This decision is based on the general belief/experience of the manufacturer I believe.
However It is not advisable to avoid strut members even if you can theoretically justify that
the panel and purlin is designed to act as diaphragm .
This will lead to over stress and repeated stress in self drilled panel screws which would fail
due to fatigue and also while erecting the building the purlin, girts and panels are erected after
the main frames and bracings are erected. SO having struts at roof and walls are very
important for the building right from the period of erection till its design life time.
Best regards
Janakiraman Narasimhan
20-01-2015 15:02
3 of 7
http://www.sefindia.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=58226
--auto removed--
General Sponsor
I agree that 'tension only X-braced rods' are the cheapest method of providing resistance to
horizontal loads -- cheapest to the PEB vendor, of course. But I have my doubts on the
effectiveness of the method. Being cheap cannot be a criterion for its acceptance as a structural
solution.
Indrajit Barua.
From: krane <forum@sefindia.org>
Sent: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:05:50
To: general@sefindia.org
Subject: [SEFI] Re: Bracing rods in PEB - slenderness
Dear Mr. Barua,
After so many to and fro email on this subject, need is identified to provide some literature on
usage of rods in bracing systems...
1. AISC steel design guide 7 - Industrial buildings roofs to anchor rods - second edition - by James
Fisher
2. X - Bracing anchorage connection under static and seismic loading conditions - Technical paper
by R. Ralph Sinno, ASCE Journal of structural engineering, November 1993.
3. Any good latest text book on steel structural design
Tension only x braced configuration is the cheapest and most effective and is employed where
other consideration do not preclude its use. It is especially applicable to bracing systems with
large panel sizes i.e. in height or width or both.
Further, please note as per AISC, tension only X brace rods are allowed in OCBF for all seismic
applications. Brace rods are NOT allowed in OCBF with K, V or inverted V configurations as these
require tension-compression braces and seismically compact members. Use of brace rods is
prohibited in SCBF for the same reason.
In order to calculate limit state of rods below sections from AISC are to be referred.
1. Tension yielding in the main rod body - AISC D2(a)
2. Tension rupture in the main rod body - AISC D2(b)
3. Rod design based on the major thread diameter - AISC J3.6 and AISC Table J3.2
Indian code do not allow rod in seismic applications. However design equations are available in
Indian code for brace rod design.
I represent TATA BlueScope Steel, India, company which is in metal building system construction.
I will be delighted to clarify all your doubts regarding bracing rods in metal building systems.
Do let me know if you need any other detail to clarify your doubt.
Regards,
K. Rane
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:10 PM, ibarua <forum@sefindia.org (forum@sefindia.org)> wrote:
Quote:
20-01-2015 15:02
4 of 7
http://www.sefindia.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=58226
To all,
Just to share a thought that in general, PEB buildings in UAE rely on the diaphragm action
from a combination of roof struts along the lateral force's load path and tension bracings in
both walls and roof or portal bracings in wall and X bracings in roof.
Contradictory in the USA, most of the PEB companies take the diaphragm capacity of the
panels i.e. panel shear capacity to further economize the structure. But this idea will not
eliminate the presence of a strut member at the bracing break locations.
This decision is based on the general belief/experience of the manufacturer I believe.
However It is not advisable to avoid strut members even if you can theoretically justify that
the panel and purlin is designed to act as diaphragm .
This will lead to over stress and repeated stress in self drilled panel screws which would fail
due to fatigue and also while erecting the building the purlin, girts and panels are erected after
the main frames and bracings are erected. SO having struts at roof and walls are very
important for the building right from the period of erection till its design life time.
Best regards
Janakiraman Narasimhan
...
Dear Friends,
Joined: 19 Oct 2009
Posts: 60
20-01-2015 15:02
5 of 7
http://www.sefindia.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=58226
In my opinion the girts provided for side wall sheeting will acts as compression members to
transfer compressive force & brace rods will acts as tension members, based on loading condition.
The design report provided by vendor for one project covers designs of main elements but not the
girts/x brace.
Regards,
Raghuveer
General Sponsor
Dear All,
The sheeting provides enormous stiffness to the structure in industrial buildings. But to consider
its effects in design we need to provide special shear connections. Prof. Bryan , Davies and
co-researchers of Univ. of Salford, UK did considerable work in the 1970s on stressed skin design
of buildings and discuss about these connections. To know more read: http://www.fgg.unilj.si/kmk/esdep/master/wg09/l0500.htm
Best wishes,
NS
raghuveerks wrote:
Dear Friends,
In my opinion the girts provided for side wall sheeting will acts as compression members to
transfer compressive force & brace rods will acts as tension members, based on loading
condition.
The design report provided by vendor for one project covers designs of main elements but not
the girts/x brace.
Regards,
20-01-2015 15:02
6 of 7
http://www.sefindia.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=58226
Raghuveer
SEFI Member
http://www.sefindia.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=15317&highlight=
Joined: 02 Dec 2013
Posts: 10
thanks
Back to top
Display posts from previous: All Posts
Oldest First
Go
All times are GMT
Page 5 of 5
Jump to: SEFI General Discussion
Translation: Translate topic
Go
Go
You cannot post new topics
You cannot reply to topics
You cannot edit your posts
You cannot delete your posts
You cannot vote in polls
You cannot attach files
You can download files
in
in
in
in
in
in
in
this
this
this
this
this
this
this
forum
forum
forum
forum
forum
forum
forum
20-01-2015 15:02
7 of 7
http://www.sefindia.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=58226
tsunami
earthquake
The Japan Times - Hundreds of tsunami-caused fires could accompany Nankai Trough quake: expert
Kansas.com - Earthquakes rumble in southern Kansas, northern Oklahoma
powered by
powered by
20-01-2015 15:02