Design of Pile and Pile Cap Final

Patna ROB's (Package -VIII)
Design of Abutment Pier and its Foundation
SUMMARY OF LOAD CASES

A) Forces and Moments at the Base of Pier
S.No
1
2
3
4
Description of Cases
Normal - Longitudinal Moment
Case
Normal - Transverse Moment
Case
Seismic Case -Longitudinal
Seismic Case -Transverse
Vertical Load (t)

911.91
Mll (tm)
382.91
Mtt (tm)
222.42
887.70
382.91
227.53
828.81
816.70
1155.12
727.65
113.76
1418.78
B) Forces and Moments at the Base of Pier - One Span Dislodged Condition
S.No
1
2
3
4
Case
Case
Vertical Load (t)

460.71
Mll (tm)
116.57
Mtt (tm)
0.00
460.71
116.57
0.00
460.71
460.71
668.80
116.57
0.00
668.80
Vertical Load (t)

1119.56
Mll (tm)
467.16
Mtt (tm)
222.42
1095.35
367.36
227.53
1036.46
1024.36
1373.79
861.08
111.21
1660.45
C) Forces and Moments at the Base of Pile Cap

S.No
1
2
3
4
Case
Case
Scott Wilson
Design Pier of dia 2.5m

SOLID CIRCULAR SECTION SUBJECTED TO AXIAL THRUST AND BENDING
PIER (Long.mom, NORMAL)
Dia. of section
Modular ratio
Vertical Load
Bending Moment
Effective Cover
=
=
=
=
=
250
10
911.91
442.82
9.90
cm
Ast.provided
546.888
cm2
N.A.assumed
Ar
C
c.g.
Ixx
Aeff.
e
e'
e - e'
Ieff
Dist. Of N.a
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
203.57138
257.78579
42785.73690
194.58025
14.34881
122185566
47707.73294
48.55940
12.86845
35.69095
155697724
91.43983
-78.57138
R=
t
tm
cm
cm
deg or
cm2
cm
cm
cm4
cm2
125
Stress in Con. =
Stress in R/f. =
Stress in Con. =
Stress in R/f. =
cm
43
-76
115
-2000
kg/cm2
kg/cm2
kg/cm2
kg/cm2
0.00
4.4992109 rad
Percentage of Steel
No of Bars
Dia of Bar
1.10%
539.96124
68
32
546.888
-78.57138

PIER (Trans.mom, NORMAL)
Dia. of section
Modular ratio
Vertical Load
Bending Moment
Effective Cover
=
=
=
=
=
250
10
887.70
445.40
9.90
cm
Ast.provided
546.888
cm2
N.A.assumed
Ar
C
c.g.
Ixx
Aeff.
e
e'
e - e'
Ieff
Dist. Of N.a
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
199.49908
253.06500
41980.10375
200.87983
16.09105
115417127.3
46902.09979
50.17533
14.40242
35.77291
149161126.3
88.90150
-74.49908
Scott Wilson
t
tm
cm
cm
deg or
cm2
cm
cm
cm4
cm2
-74.49908
R=
125
Stress in Con. =
Stress in R/f. =
Stress in Con. =
Stress in R/f. =
cm
48.0
-86
173
-3000
0.00
4.4168175 rad
Percentage of Steel
No of Bars
Dia of Bar
1.10%
539.96124
68
32
546.888
kg/cm2
kg/cm2
kg/cm2
kg/cm2
Scott Wilson

Pier (CASE, SEISMIC) - Long mom
Dia. of section
Modular ratio
Vertical Load
Bending Moment
Effective Cover
=
=
=
=
=
250
10
828.81
1160.71
9.90
cm
Ast.provided
546.888
cm2
N.A.assumed
Ar
C
c.g.
Ixx
Aeff.
e
e'
e - e'
Ieff
Dist. Of N.a
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
103.12051
159.77419
19084.88158
246.11592
65.09511
14131097.6
24006.87762
140.04491
51.74902
88.29588
63314702.08
29.86953
21.87949
R=
t
tm
cm
cm
deg or
cm2
cm
cm
cm4
cm2
125
Stress in Con. =
Stress in R/f. =
Stress in Con. =
Stress in R/f. =
cm
119
-1583
173
-3000
kg/cm2
kg/cm2
kg/cm2
kg/cm2
0.00
2.7885857 rad
Percentage of Steel
No of Bars
Dia of Bar
1.10%
539.96124
68
32
546.888
21.879491

Pier (CASE, SEISMIC) - trans mom
Dia. of section
Modular ratio
Vertical Load
Bending Moment
Effective Cover
=
=
=
=
=
250
10
816.70
1594.49
9.90
cm
Ast.provided
546.888
cm2
N.A.assumed
=
90.71854
=
148.10554
= 16066.97608
=
240.37879
=
72.03989
= 9192042.058
= 20988.97212
=
195.23500
=
55.14625
=
140.08875
= 61349128.135
=
20.86479
34.28146
Ar
C
c.g.
Ixx
Aeff.
e
e'
e - e'
Ieff
Dist. Of N.a
Scott Wilson
t
tm
cm
cm
deg or
cm2
cm
cm
cm4
cm2
34.281464
R=
125
Stress in Con. =
Stress in R/f. =
Stress in Con. =
Stress in R/f. =
cm
169
-2786
173
-3000
0.00
2.5849292 rad
Percentage of Steel
No of Bars
Dia of Bar
1.10%
539.96124
68
32
546.888
kg/cm2
kg/cm2
kg/cm2
kg/cm2
Live Load Calculations

Maxium Longitudinal moment case
Case 1 :
70R Wheeled
100 t
2.595
2.905
11
5.124
100 t
1.05
2.1
27.90
Ra
Rb
Ra =
Rb =
Longitudinal Moment
Transverse Moment
Braking force
Case 1 :
1.05
27.9
Rc
100 x 23.826 / 27.9
=
=
=
=
=
70.796 x
85.398 x 2.905
Rd
85.398
15 t
0
248.081
20
t
t-m
t-m
t
Class A
55.4 t
1.3
4.2
11
5.714
55.40 t
1.05
2.1
Ra
27.9
Ra =
Rb =
Longitudinal Moment
Transverse Moment
Braking force
55.4 x 23.236 / 27.9
27.9
=
=
=
=
=
36.878 x
46.139 x 4.2
IRC class A, two lanes
Reaction Rb
Reaction Rc
Total reaction on pier
Longitudinal moment on column
Transverse moment on column
IRC class A, three lanes
1-lane
46.1
9.3
55.4
0.0
193.78
2-lane
92.3
18.5
110.8
0.0
226.08
t
t
t
tm
tm
46.139
9t
0
193.784
11.08
t
t-m
t-m
t
1-lane
46.14
9.26
55.40
0.00
193.78
3-lane
138.42
27.78
166.20
0.00
96.89
70W
85.398
14.602
100.000
0.000
248.081
A
46.139
9.261
55.400
0.000
193.784
Reaction Rb for three lanes

Reaction Rc for three lanes
t
t
t
tm
tm
IRC class 70W+A
Reaction Rb
Reaction Rc
transverse moment on column
Total
131.537
23.863
155.400
0.000
209.324
t
t
t
tm
tm
Maximun Transverse moment Case/ Maxmium Reaction Case

Case 2 :
70R Wheeled
One lane of class 70-R(W)

Cg of 100 t
3.324
Cg of 49
Cg of 51
3.194 m
1.05 m
Ra
27.90 m
Rb
Rc
2.1
Rb =
Rc =
Vertical Reaction
Longitudinal Moment
Transverse Moment
One lane of class-A

Cg of
51 x 25.756 / 27.9
27.90 m
Rb =
Rc =
Vertical Reaction
Longitudinal Moment
=
=
=
=
=
45.006 x
92.087 x 2.905
Cg of
t
55.40 t
28.2
5.024
1.05 m
Ra
27.90 m
m
45.006
47.081
92.087
0
267.513
Cg of 27.20
t
t
t
t-m
t-m
5.209
Rb
Rc
2.1
27.2 x 23.741 / 27.9
-1.038 x
27.90 m
m
=
=
=
=
Rd
23.145
24.183
47.328
0
t
t
t
t-m
Transverse Moment
47.328 x 4.2
70R Wheeled
100 t
2.595
2.905
11
Class 2A
55.4 t
1.3
4.2
55.40 t
0.7
1.2
11
Class 3A
55.4 t
1.3
4.2
55.40 t
0.7
1.2
1.2
11
-2.8
70 R + Class A
100 t
2.595
2.905
55.40 t
-0.84
1.2
11
IRC class A, two lanes
Reaction Rb
Reaction Rc
1-lane
23.15
24.18
47.33
0.00
198.78
2-lane
46.29
48.37
94.66
0.00
231.91
t
t
t
tm
tm
1-lane
23.15
24.18
47.33
0.00
198.78
3-lane
69.44
72.55
141.98
0.00
99.39
t
t
t
tm
tm
IRC class A, three lanes
Reaction Rb for three lanes

Reaction Rc for three lanes
IRC class 70W+A
198.778 t-m
Reaction Rb
Reaction Rc
70W
45.006
47.081
92.087
0.000
267.513
A
23.145
24.183
47.328
0.000
198.778
Total
68.151
71.264
139.415
0.000
227.757
A
55.40 t
20%
5%
11.1
5.54
1.20
2.15
1.33
2-A
110.8
20%
5%
11.1
5.54
1.20
2.15
1.33
3-A
166.2
20%
5%
13.9
6.93
1.20
2.15
1.66
t
t
t
tm
tm
Horizontal Braking Force

70W
100 t
20%
5%
20.0
10.00
1.20
2.15
2.40
Vertical load
Braking 2-lane %
Braking 3rd-lane %
H. Braking force
H. Force on each pier
Force ht. from deck
Ht. of Superstructure
Reaction on pier
Summary of loads transferred on Pier from Super Structure

Max.Transverse Moment
Loading
420.5
92.09
47.33
94.66
142.0
139.4
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
267.5
198.8
231.9
99.4
227.8
t
t
m
m
t
Max. Longitudinal Moment
Vertical
Long.
Trans.
Braking Hreaction (t) moment t.m) moment (t.m)
force (t)
Dead load
70 W
A
2A
3A
70 W+A
70W+A
155.4
20%
5%
22.8
11.39
1.20
2.15
2.73
0.00
10.00
5.54
5.54
6.93
11.39
Braking Vforce (t)
0.00
2.40
1.33
1.33
1.66
2.73
Vertical
reaction (t)
420.55
85.40
55.40
110.80
166.20
155.40
Long.
moment
(t.m)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Governing values
Loading
Dead load
Live load
Braking
Total
For Max.Transverse Moment

Vertical
reaction
(kN)
420.5
142.0
2.7
144.7
Long.
moment
(kN.m)
0.00
0.0
0.00
For Max. Longitudinal Moment
Trans.
Long. Ecc.
moment
(m)
(kN.m)
0.0
231.9
231.9
0.00
Trans.
Ecc. (m)
1.60
Vertical
reaction
(kN)
420.55
166.2
2.7
168.93
Long.
moment
(kN.m)
0.00
0.0
0.00
1.05
Rb
1.05
Rd
1.05
Max. Longitudinal Moment

Trans.
moment
(t.m)
0.00
248.08
193.78
226.08
96.89
209.32
Braking Hforce (t)
0.00
10.00
5.54
5.54
6.93
11.39
Braking Vforce (t)
0.00
2.40
1.33
1.33
1.66
2.73
For Max. Longitudinal Moment

Trans.
Long. Ecc.
moment
(m)
(kN.m)
0.00
226.1
226.08
0.00
Trans. Ecc.
(m)
1.34
IRC 70R Loading

8276
8t
12 t
610
3960
CG =
8276
5124
12 t
1520
17 t
2130
17 t
1370
17 t
3050
17 t
1370
910
Minimum Clearence
Width of Lanne
For Max Longitudinal Moment Case

Span
Load
CG
4420
51 t
1930
5790
68 t
2895
7920
80 t
3649
9440
92 t
4404
13400
100 t
5124
For Max Transition Moment Case
Total Span Total Load Span 1
load
4420
51 t
17 t
5790
68 t
34 t
7920
80 t
46 t
9440
92 t
58 t
13400
100 t
49 t
cg
1120
2210
2190
2180
3324
Span 2
load
34 t
34 t
34 t
34 t
51 t
cg
1245
2210
2964
3719
3194
IRC Class A Loading
2.7 t
2.7 t
1100
11.4 t
3200
11.4 t
1200
6.8 t
4300
6.8 t
3000
6.8 t
3000
6.8 t
3000
For Max Longitudinal Moment Case

Span
5500
8500
11500
14500
Total Load Span 1

load
35.00 t
5.40 t
41.80 t
5.40 t
48.60 t
5.40 t
55.40 t
5.40 t
For Maxmium Transverse Moment Case
cg
3750
3750
3750
3750
Span 2
load
29.60 t
36.40 t
43.20 t
50.00 t
cg
1726
2991
4331
5714
1.2
2.79
Span
9000
13300
14500
17700
18800
Total Load CG from R Span 1

load
cg
27.2
4500
13.6
38.6 t
7099
18.2
50.0
8786
29.6
52.7 t
9243
25.5
55.4 t
9709
28.2
Minimum Clearence
Width of Lane
Min Distance Between Lanes
Seismic Factors
Zone
Zone Factor
II
0.1
III
0.16
IV
0.24
V
0.36
0.15
2.3
1.2
3000
4594
7372
5059
5024
Span 2
load
cg
13.6
3000
20.4
4099
20.4
5786
27.2
4743
27.2
5209
DEAD LOADS OF SUPERSTRUCTURE

RAILING WEIGHT
RCC UNIT WEIGHT
WEARING COAT WT.
DECK SLAB THK. AT C/L
OF BRIDGE
DEPTH OF BEAM
DEPTH OF DIAPHRMS.
SLOPE OF W. COAT
CANTILEVER END
CANTILEVER INTERM.
CANTILEVER MIDDLE
TOTAL DEPTH
700
=
=
=
=
3
2.4
2.2
0.25
KN / M PER RAILINGS
T / M3
T / M3
M
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
2.15
1.43
2.5
200
350
300
2400
M
M
%
MM
MM
MM
MM
30000
26800
900
2650
625
900
700
325
300
300
2650
2650
2025
12
11
0.5
0.5
1.1
1.1
0.425
2.50%
200
6
0.325
0.15
0.25
6
0
0.25
C/L OF BRIDGE
C/L OF CG. WAY
0.625
FILE: 257928472.xls
SHEET: DEAD LOADS
RITES
15 OF 39
A.
RAILING WEIGHT
B.
KERB WEIGHT
= 0.425
= 15.30
=
=
=
=
X
T
3
KN / M PER RAILINGS
2 X 3 X 30000 / 1000 X 0.1
18.00 T
0.5
30
2.4
30
2.4
-0.025
2.4
30
2.4
30
0.5
30
LEVER ARM WRT C/L OF BRIDGE

=
5.75
M
ANTICLOCKWISE MOMENT
=
-43.99
T-M
KERB ON RIGHT SIDE
= 0.425
X
= 15.30
T
0.5

=
5.75
M
CLOCKWISE MOMENT
=
43.99
FOOTPATH LOADS
=
0
X
=
0
SERVICE PIPE LOADS
=
0
X
=
0
T-M
NET FOOTPATH LOADS

=
0 T
=
5.50
M
CLOCKWISE MOMENT
=
0.0 T - M
D
PCC FILLING LOADS

TRINGULAR PORTION
=
0
X
=
0 T
5.5
2.4

=
3.67
M
FILE: 257928472.xls
SHEET: DEAD LOADS
RITES
16 OF 39
=
0.00
T-M
RECTANGULAR PORTION
=
0
X
=
0 T
0.5
30
2.4

=
5.75
M
=
0.00
T-M
E
WEARING COAT
=
11 X
=
47.19 T
0.065 X
2.2 X
30
TOTAL IMPOSED LOAD ON DECK SLAB

=
18 + 15.3 + 15.3 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 47.19
=
95.8 T
TOTAL MOMENT WRT C/L OF CG WAY
=
0.0
F
DIAPHRAGMS WEIGHT
END DIAPHRAGMS
=
2.4 X
=
12.51 T
3 X
1.43 X
0.3 X
2.025 X
MID DIAPHRAGMS
=
2.4 X
=
7.181 T
3 X
1.43 X
0.3 X
2.325
TOTAL DIAPHRAGMS WEIGHT
=
=
12.51 +
19.69 T
7.181
GIRDERS SELF WEIGHT

END PORTION
=
0.625 X
=
4.515 T
TAPERING PORTION
0.6
+
0.325
=
X
2
=
2.15 X
0.7 X
2.15 X
2.4 X
2 X
0.9 X
2.4
4.412 T
FILE: 257928472.xls
SHEET: DEAD LOADS
RITES
17 OF 39
MID PORTION
=
0.325 X
2.15 X
=
44.94 T
EXTRA CONCRETE AT BOTTOM =
TOTAL LOAD OF ONE GIRDER
=
64.97 T
TOTAL LOAD OF FOUR GIRDERS
=
259.9 T
2.4 X
26.8
11.1 (BULB)
DECK SLAB LOADS

MIDDLE DECK SLAB
2.5 %
224.7
209.1
142.8
150.6 158.4
183.8
625
250
216.9
237.3
2025
2650
1325
3975
AREA OF MIDDLE DECK SLAB
WEIGHT
=
=
1.684 X
121.3 T
=
=
=
2.4 X
( 0.143 + 0.25 ) X 0.5 X ( 3.975 + 0.625 / 2 )

0.842 X
2
1.684 M2
30
CANTILEVER SLAB
2025
A1
200
2025
A2
200
350
1713
1863
625
A1
Amid
A2
=
=
=
=
300
0.471 M2
0.468 M2
0.466 M2
325
0
0.7
1.6
TO
TO
TO
0.7
1.6
15
=
=
=
0.7 M
0.9 M
13.4 M
67 T
TOTAL SLAB LOAD
TOTAL DEAD LOADS

=
18.00 +
19.69 +
=
563.71
=
=
67.11 +
188.4
15.30 +
259.9 +
T
121.3
0 +
188.4 +
0 +
15.30
47.19 +
DEAD LOAD REACTION

RG
=
281.9 T
FILE: 257928472.xls
SHEET: DEAD LOADS
RITES
18 OF 39
DESIGN OF PIER AND ITS PILE FOUNDATION - P1 & P2

Deck Level
53.250
11.00
1.00 0.50
50.650
6.430
4.250
(typ)
2.500
3.100
Circular
42.920 Avg GL
3.100
Top of
1.80
42.720 Pile Cap Lvl

40.920
1000 dia
3.6
3.6
15.920
Rectangular Column
3.40
3
2
3
3.40
Plan - Pier Cap

A
DESIGN DATA:
1. Density Of concrete
2. Density Of Soil
3. Length of Pile
4. Over all Depth of Super Structure
5. Cross Slope
6*0.025
6. Wearing Coat
Scott Wilson
2.400
1.800
25
1.5
0.15
0.09
t/m3
t/m3
m
m
m
m
DESIGN OF PIER AND ITS PILE FOUNDATION
53.250
0.800
1.00 0.50
50.65
6.430
C/L of exp gap and C/L of Column
2.500
Circular
42.920 Avg GL
Top of
42.720 Pile Cap Lvl
1.25
1.80
1.25
40.920
0
1000 dia
3.6
Cg of Pile Cap
15.920
Scott Wilson
LOAD CALCULATIONS AT PIER BASE

Dead Load+ SIDl LHS
Dead Load+ SIDl RHS
285
285
t
t
Normal Case
S.No
Vertical Load
Value (t)
Distance w.r.t c.g
of Shaft (m) in
Long
1
2
Dead Load + SIDL

Live Load (Max Long
Moment)
3
Live Load (Max Trans
Moment)
5
Pier cap
6
Pier Shaft
Max Long Moment case
Max Trans Moment case
570.00
166.20
0.000
0.000
141.98
99.96
75.75
911.91
887.70
0.000
Moment About Pier

Moment about
Distance w.r.t
c.g of Shaft in c.g of Shaft (m)
Long (t-m)
in Trans
Moment about
c.g of Shaft in
Trans (t-m)
0.00
0.00
0.000
1.338
0.000
222.42
0.000
1.602
227.53
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
222.42
227.53
Horizontal Force (As per Clause 214.5.1 of IRC:6-2000)

Coefficent of friction
Applied Horizontal force
Dead Load + SIDL - on Full span
Dead Load + SIDL - RHS Span
Dead Load + SIDL - LHS Span
Live Load Reaction at free end - Max Long Moment Case
0.05
20
570.00
285.00
285.00
166.200
t
t
t
t
t
cg from Pier shaft base (Long)

Moment about Pier Shaft base (Long)
-16.810
46.810
46.810
8.18
382.906
t
t
t
m
t-m
Free Bearing - Max Longitudinal Moment Case

50.65-42.72+0.25
(0.05*(570+166.2))
Horizontal force
8.2 m
36.810 t
301.106 t-m
Force at Bearings : Normal Case

1. Fixed Bearing - Max Longitudinal Moment Case
Greater of - I
or -II
(20-0.05*(570+166.2))
(20/2+0.05*(570+166.2))
36.810*8.18
Seismic Case Calculations

Seismic coefficient :
Ah = horizontal seismic coefficient
Z = Zone Factor
I = Importance Factor
Sa / g = Average response acceleration coefficient
R = Response reduction factor
Horizontal seismic coefficient
Vertical seismic coefficient
Scott Wilson
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
( Z / 2 ) . ( Sa / g ) / ( R / I )
0.24 (Bridge is Zone IV)
1.5
2.5
2.5
0.18
0.090 For Case IV
Force at Bearings : Seismic Case 1. Fixed Bearing - Max Longitudinal Moment Case
Greater of - I
or -II
2. Free Bearing 50.65-42.72+0.25
(0.05*(570+166.2/2))
Horizontal force
88.955*8.18
79.945
88.955
88.955
8.18
727.652
t
t
t
m
t-m
32.655*8.18
8.18 m
32.655 t
267.118 t-m
Forces and Moments at the Base of Pier

Normal Case
I: Max Longitudinal Moment Case
Vertical Load
Transverse Moment
Longitudinal Moment
911.91 t
222.422 t-m
382.906 t-m
911.912
222.422
301.106
II: Max Transverse Moment Case

Vertical Load
Transverse Moment
Longitudinal Moment
887.70 t
227.526 t-m
382.906 t-m
887.696
227.526
301.106
Seismic Case: (Longitudinal)

Seismic Coefficient
S.No
Horizontal Load
0.18
Value (t)
Acting at a
Moment about
distance from pile Pile Cap Top (tcap top (m)
m)
On Dead Load + SIDL
102.60
9.48
972.65
2
3
On Pier Cap
On Pier Shaft
Total
17.99
13.64
134.23
7.71
3.22
138.635
43.84
1155.12
Seismic Case: (Transverse)

S.No
Horizontal Load
Value (t)
Acting at a
Moment about
m)
On Dead Load + SIDL
102.60
9.48
972.65
2
3
4
5
On Pier Cap
On Pier Shaft
Centrifugal force
Live Load
Total
17.99
13.64
0.00
12.78
147.01
7.71
3.22
11.73
11.73
138.63
43.84
0.00
149.89
1305.01
Longitudinal Seismic Case

Vertical Load
Transverse Moment
Longitudinal Moment
(911.912-0.5*166.2)
0.5*227.526
0.000+1,155.120
828.81 t
113.763 t-m
1155.120 t-m
Transverse Seismic Case

Vertical Load
Transverse Moment
Longitudinal Moment
(887.696-0.5*141.984)
0.5 x 227.525978421843 +1305.013
0 +727.652
816.70 t
1418.776 t-m
727.652 t-m
Scott Wilson
ONE SPAN DISLODGED CONDITION

Normal Case
S.No
Vertical Load
Value (t)
Distance w.r.t c.g
of Shaft (m) in
Long
1
2
3
5
Dead Load + SIDL

Live Load (Max Long
Moment)
Live Load (Max
Trans Moment)
Pier cap
6
Pier Shaft
285.00
0.00
0.000
0.400
0.00
Moment About Pier

Moment about
Distance w.r.t
c.g of Shaft in c.g of Shaft (m)
Long (t-m)
in Trans
Moment about
c.g of Shaft in
Trans (t-m)
0.000
0.00
0.000
1.338
0.000
0.00
0.000
1.602
0.00
99.96
0.000
0.000
0.00
0.000
75.75
460.71
460.71
0.000
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
0.00
0.00

Dead Load + SIDL -Reaction
Live Load Reaction at free end - Max Long Moment Case
Dead Load + SIDL -Full Span
0.05
0
285.00
0.000
570.00
t
t
t
t

Greater of - I
or -II
14.250*8.18
-14.250
14.250
14.250
8.18
116.565
14.250*8.18
14.250 t
116.565 t-m
(0-0.05*(285+0))
(0/2+0.05*(285+0))

50.65-42.72+0.25
t
t
t
m
t-m
2. Free Bearing - Max Longitudinal Moment Case

(0.05*(285+0))
Horizontal force

Seismic coefficient :
Ah = horizontal seismic coefficient
Z = Zone Factor
I = Importance Factor
Sa / g = Average response acceleration coefficient
R = Response reduction factor
Horizontal seismic coefficient
Vertical seismic coefficient
Scott Wilson
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
( Z / 2 ) . ( Sa / g ) / ( R / I )
0.24 (Bridge is Zone IV)
1.5
2.5
2.5
0.18
0.090 For Case IV
Force at Bearings : Seismic Case - Longitudinal

Free Bearing - Max Longitudinal Moment Case
50.65-42.72+0.25
(0.05*(285+0/2))
Horizontal force
14.250*8.18
8.18 m
14.250 t
116.565 t-m
Forces and Moments at the Base of Pier - One Span Dislodged Condition
Normal Case
Vertical Load
Transverse Moment
Longitudinal Moment
460.712
0.000
0.000+116.565
460.71 t
0.000 t-m
116.565 t-m

Vertical Load
Transverse Moment
Longitudinal Moment
460.71
0.000
0+116.565
460.71 t
0.000 t-m
116.565 t-m

Seismic Case: (Longitudinal)
Horizontal Seismic Coefficient
S.No
1
2
3
Horizontal Load
On Dead Load +
SIDL
On Pier Cap
On Pier Shaft
Total
0.18
Value (t)
Acting at a
Moment about
m)
51.300
9.48
486.32
17.99
13.64
82.93
7.71
3.22
138.635
43.84
668.80
Seismic Case: (Transverse)

S.No
1
2
3
4
Horizontal Load
On Dead Load +
SIDL
On Pier Cap
On Pier Shaft
Live Load
Total
Value (t)
Acting at a
Moment about
m)
51.300
9.48
486.32
17.99
13.64
0.00
82.93
7.71
3.22
11.73
138.63
43.84
0.00
668.80

Vertical Load
Transverse Moment
Longitudinal Moment
460.712-0.5*0
0.000
0.000+668.796
460.71 t
0.000 t-m
668.796 t-m

Vertical Load
Transverse Moment
Longitudinal Moment
Scott Wilson
460.712-0.5*0
0.000+668.796
0.000+116.565
460.71 t
668.796 t-m
116.565 t-m
LOAD CALCULATIONS - AT PILE CAP BASE

Load Calculations of Pile Cap and soil wt above pile cap
Depth of pile cap
Self Weight of Pile Cap
Soil weight above pile cap
1.5 m
191.68 t
15.973 t
Normal Case
S.No
Vertical Load
Value (t)
Distance w.r.t c.g
of Pile cap (m) in
Long
1
2
3
5
Dead Load + SIDL

Live Load (Max Long
Moment)
Live Load (Max
Trans Moment)
Pier cap
6
Pier Shaft
Moment About Cg of Pile Cap

Moment about
Distance w.r.t
c.g of Pile Cap c.g of Pile Cap
in Long (t-m)
(m) in Trans
Moment about
c.g of Pile Cap
in Trans (t-m)
570.00
166.20
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.338
0.000
222.422
141.98
0.000
0.000
1.602
227.526
99.96
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
75.75
911.91
887.70
0.000
0.000
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
222.42
227.53

Dead Load + SIDL Reaction at Pier - Full span
Live Load Reaction at free end
Dead Load + SIDL -Full Span
0.05
20
570.00
166.200
570.00
t
t
t
t

-16.810
46.810
46.810
9.98
467.164
t
t
t
m
t-m

50.65-40.92+0.25
(0.05*(570+166.2))
Horizontal force
9.98 m
36.810 t
367.364 t-m

Greater of - I
or -II
(20-0.05*(570+166.2))
(20/2+0.05*(570+166.2))
Force at Bearings : Seismic Case

Greater of - I
or -II
Scott Wilson
36.810*9.98
79.945
88.955
88.955
9.680
861.084
t
t
t
m
t-m

50.65-40.92+0.25
(0.05*(570+166.2/2))
Horizontal force
32.655*9.98
0.18
9.98 m
32.655 t
325.897 t-m

Forces and Moments at the Base of Pile Cap
Normal Case
Vertical Load
Transverse Moment
Longitudinal Moment
1119.56 t
222.422 t-m
467.164 t-m
911.912+191.68+15.97
222.422
467.164

Vertical Load
Transverse Moment
Longitudinal Moment
1095.35 t
227.526 t-m
367.364 t-m
887.696+191.68+15.97
227.526
0.000+467.164

S.No
1
2
3
Horizontal Load
On Dead Load +
SIDL
On Pier Cap
On Pier Shaft
Total
Scott Wilson
0.18
Value (t)
Acting at a
Moment about
distance from pile Pile Cap Base (tcap Base (m)
m)
102.600
11.28
1157.33
17.99
13.64
134.23
8.230
5.02
148.081
68.38
1373.79

S.No
1
2
3
4
5
Horizontal Load
On Dead Load +
SIDL
On Pier Cap
On Pier Shaft
Centrifugal force
Live Load
Total
Value (t)
Acting at a
Moment about
m)
102.600
11.28
1157.33
17.99
13.64
0.00
12.78
147.01
8.230
5.02
13.53
13.53
148.08
68.38
172.89
1546.68

Vertical Load
Transverse Moment
Longitudinal Moment
911.912-0.5*166.2+191.68+15.97
0.5*222.422
0.000+1,373.790
1036.46 t
111.211 t-m
1373.790 t-m

Vertical Load
Transverse Moment
Longitudinal Moment
Scott Wilson
887.696-0.5*141.984+191.68+15.97
0.5*227.526+1,546.684+0.000+0.000
0.000+325.897
1024.36 t
1660.447 t-m
861.084 t-m
DESIGN OF PILE & PILE CAP

A
p
Y
0.75
3.60
w
t
0.75
0.75
3.6
v
L
3.6
4.35
u
B 0.75
p
CL of brg/Column
T
Y CL of Pile Cap
2.550
0.000
Total Width of Pile Cap in Longitudinal Dircetion
0.75+3.6+0.75
Total Width of Pile Cap in Transverse direction
0.75+3.6+3.6+0.75
5.10 m
8.70 m
Cg in Longitudinal Direction
No.of
Piles
3
3
6
Pile No.s
Pile-Dia
(m)
PileSection
Area of
pile
4,5,6
1,2,3
1.2
1.2
p-p
t-t
1.1310
1.1310
Cg of Pile Group
Distance between C/L of brg to cg of pile group
Total
area in
section
(A)
3.393
3.393
6.786
distance
from
section A-A
(x)
0.750
4.350
distance Distance
Area of
dia of pile
from
w.r.t c.g of
Pile No
pile (m2) m
section A- Pile group
A
A (m)
(m) - d
Scott Wilson
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.1310
1.1310
1.1310
1.1310
1.1310
1.1310
6.786
4.350
4.350
4.350
0.750
0.750
0.750
2.545
14.759
17.304
2.5500 m from left end Section A-A

0.000 m
Along Longitudinal Direction
1
2
3
4
5
6
A*x
1.800
1.800
1.800
1.800
1.800
1.800
d2
3.240
3.240
3.240
3.240
3.240
3.240
Total M.I =
x2
3.240
3.240
3.240
3.240
3.240
3.240
19.440
Cg in Transverse Direction
No.of
Piles
2
2
2
6
Pile No.s
Pile-Dia
(m)
PileSection
Area of
pile
3,6
2,5
1,4
1.2
1.2
1.2
u-u
v-v
w-w
1.1310
1.1310
1.1310
Cg of Pile Group
Distance between C/L of brg to cg of pile gr
Total
area in
section
(A)
2.262
2.262
2.262
6.786
distance
from
section B-B
(y)
0.750
4.350
7.950
distance Distance
Area of
dia of pile
from
w.r.t c.g of
Pile No
pile (m2) m
section B- Pile group
A
B (m)
(m) - d
Scott Wilson
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.131
1.131
1.131
1.131
1.131
1.131
6.786
7.950
4.350
0.750
7.950
4.350
0.750
1.696
9.839
17.982
29.518
4.3500 m from left end Section A-A

0.000 m
Along Transverse Direction
1
2
3
4
5
6
A*y
3.600
0.000
3.600
3.600
0.000
3.600
d2
12.960
0.000
12.960
12.960
0.000
12.960
Total M.I =
y2
12.960
0.000
12.960
12.960
0.000
12.960
51.840
Pile Reactions
Pile Capacity for 1000mm dia pile
350 t
No. of Piles
x2
19.44
y2
51.84
Dia of
Pile
(mm)
Pile
No
1200
2
3
1200
1200
4
5
6
1200
1200
1200
S.No
Distances w.r.t
along directions
Normal - Longitudinal Moment Case
x (m)
y (m)
P/N
Mll * x/x^2
Mtt * y/y^2
Total (t)
Check
1.800
3.600
186.59
43.26
15.45
245.30
O.K
2
3
1.800
1.800
0.000
3.600
186.59
186.59
43.26
-43.26
0.00
15.45
229.85
158.78
O.K
O.K
4
5
6
1.800
1.800
1.800
3.600
0.000
3.600
186.59
186.59
186.59
43.26
43.26
-43.26
-15.45
0.00
-15.45
214.40
229.85
127.89
O.K
O.K
O.K
Max
Min
S.No
Dia of
Pile
(mm)
Pile
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
1200
1200
1200
1200
1200
1200
1
2
3
4
5
6
Distances w.r.t
along directions
245.30
127.89
Normal - Transverse Moment case
x (m)
y (m)
P/N
Mll * x/x^2
Mtt * y/y^2
Total (t)
Check
1.800
1.800
1.800
1.800
1.800
1.800
3.600
0.000
3.600
3.600
0.000
3.600
182.56
182.56
182.56
182.56
182.56
182.56
34.02
34.02
-34.02
34.02
34.02
-34.02
15.80
0.00
15.80
-15.80
0.00
-15.80
232.37
216.57
164.34
200.77
216.57
132.74
O.K
O.K
O.K
O.K
O.K
O.K
Max
Min
Distances w.r.t
along directions
232.37
132.74
S.No
Dia of
Pile
(mm)
Pile
No
x (m)
y (m)
P/N
Mll * x/x^2
Mtt * y/y^2
Total (t)
Check
1200
1.800
3.600
172.74
127.20
7.72
307.67
O.K
2
3
4
1200
1200
1200
2
3
4
1.800
1.800
1.800
0.000
3.600
3.600
172.74
172.74
172.74
127.20
-127.20
127.20
0.00
7.72
-7.72
299.95
53.26
292.22
O.K
O.K
O.K
5
6
1200
1200
5
6
1.800
1.800
0.000
3.600
172.74
172.74
127.20
-127.20
0.00
-7.72
299.95
37.82
O.K
O.K
Seismic Case - Longitudinal
Max
Min
Distances w.r.t
along directions
x (m)
y (m)
307.67
37.82
S.No
Dia of
Pile
(mm)
Pile
No
P/N
Mll * x/x^2
Mtt * y/y^2
Total (t)
Check
1
2
1200
1200
1
2
1.800
1.800
3.600
0.000
170.73
170.73
79.73
79.73
115.31
0.00
365.76
250.46
O.K
O.K
3
4
5
1200
1200
1200
3
4
5
1.800
1.800
1.800
3.600
3.600
0.000
170.73
170.73
170.73
-79.73
79.73
79.73
115.31
-115.31
0.00
206.30
135.15
250.46
O.K
O.K
O.K
1200
1.800
3.600
170.73
-79.73
115.31
206.30
O.K
Seismic Case - Transverse
Max
Min
Scott Wilson
365.76
135.15
CALCULATION OF NO. OF PILES

Total Vertical load at cg of pile cap
Total Horizontal force
Seismic Horizontal force
Vertical Capacity of 1200mm dia 25.0m long pile
Horizontal Capacity
1119.56
46.81
147.01
350
#NAME?
No. of Plies required (Vertical)

No. of Plies required (Horizontal)
3.20 no.s
#NAME? no.s
Provided No of piles
t
t
t
t
t
6 no.s
STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF PILE

Maximum Lateral Force in Longitudinal Direction on Pile Foundation under
normal condition
Corresponding Max. Vertical Load on one Pile for Load - Normal Case
and Corresponding Minimum Vertical Load on one Pile for Load - Normal Case
Maximum Lateral Force in Longitudinal Direction on Pile Foundation under
Seismic Condition
46.81 t
=
=
=
245.30 t
127.89 t
147.01 t
Corresponding Maximum Vertical Load on one Pile - Seismic case

Corresponding Minimum Vertical Load on one Pile - Seismic case
307.67 t
37.82 t
Total No. of Piles

Length of Pile
Dia of Pile
6
25 m
1.2 m
LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN

a)
Normal Case
Max. Lateral Force on one Pile under Normal

Condition
Max. Lateral load Capacity of Pile under Normal
Condition
Now, Maximum Moment in Pile is given by
Therefore, Maximum Moment in Pile under
Normal condition
Corresponding Max / Min Vertical Load
(Excluding Self Weight of pile)
b)
Seismic Case
=
=
46.8 /6
#NAME? t
#NAME?
=
=
3.76*Q
3.76*8
tm
=
=
(Max.)
(Min.)
=
147.01 / 6
Max. Lateral Force on one Pile under Seismic
Condition
=
#NAME? t
Max. Lateral load Capacity of Pile under Seismic
Condition
=
3.76*Q
Maximum Moment in Pile under Seismic
condition
=
Corresponding Max / Min Vertical Load
=
(Excluding Self Weight of pile)
Self weight of pile
The design loads and moments are summarised below :
Sr.
No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Scott Wilson
Description
Normal Case (Max. Vertical load)
Normal Case (Min. Vertical Load)
Seismic Case (Max. Vertical Load)
Seismic Case (Min. Vertical Load)
8.00 t
30.08 tm
@
@
246.0 t
127.0 t
24.60 t
=
(Max.)
(Min.)
Vertical Load
Moment (tm)
(t)
246.0
30.08
127.0
30.08
308.0
92.50
37.0
92.50
@
@
#NAME?
92.496 tm
308.0 t
37.0 t
67.9 t
Eccentricity M/V
(m)
0.122
0.237
0.300
2.500
Calculation of Reinforcement
The reinforcement in pile assumed 1% of cross-sectional area.
Area of Reinforcement
= 1/100 * 1.131 * 10000
Bar dia to be provided
=
20 mm
No. of 20 dia. Bars reqd.
= 113.1 / 3.14
No. of 20 dia. Bars prov.
Provide 20 dia , 36 nos. around periphery
As provided
= 36 * 3.14
Provide 8 dia. @ 150mm as helical reinforcement
1.00% of c/s area

113.097 cm2
=
=
36 No.
36 No.
113.100 cm2
Pile Reinforcement below Depth of Fixity

The Pile reinforcement 36b-16 dia have been provided below the depth of fixity. The details of depth of fixity
have been derived . To economize on the area of reinforcement, bars have been curtailed after providing the
anchorage length as per clause 304.6.2 of IRC: 21-2000 and minimum reinforcement as per clause 709.4.4 of
IRC: 78-2000 below the depth of fixity.
Scott Wilson

PILE (MIN LOAD, NORMAL)
Dia. of section
Modular ratio
Vertical Load
Bending Moment
Effective Cover
=
=
=
=
=
120
10
127.00
30.08
9.30
cm
Ast.provided
113.097
cm2
N.A.assumed
Ar
C
c.g.
Ixx
Aeff.
e
e'
e - e'
Ieff
Dist. Of N.a
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
94.96576
251.18907
9595.19518
97.57876
8.06921
5982977.94177
10613.07120
23.68504
7.29531
16.38973
7351117.64321
42.26106
-34.96576
R=
t
tm
cm
cm
deg or
cm2
cm
cm
cm4
cm2
60
Stress in Con. =
Stress in R/f. =
Stress in Con. =
Stress in R/f. =
cm
27
-45
115
-2000
kg/cm2
kg/cm2
kg/cm2
kg/cm2
0.00
4.3840762 rad
Percentage of Steel
No of Bars
Dia of Bar
1.00%
113.09734
36
20
113.097
-34.96576

PILE (CASE, SEISMIC) - MAX LOAD
Dia. of section
Modular ratio
Vertical Load
Bending Moment
Effective Cover
=
=
=
=
=
120
10
308.00
92.50
9.30
cm
Ast.provided
113.097
cm2
N.A.assumed
Ar
C
c.g.
Ixx
Aeff.
e
e'
e - e'
Ieff
Dist. Of N.a
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
80.48756
219.84314
8059.81412
112.81919
14.84714
3642321.31396
9077.69014
30.03117
13.18234
16.84883
5149759.99027
33.66990
-20.48756
Scott Wilson
t
tm
cm
cm
deg or
cm2
cm
cm
cm4
cm2
-20.48756
R=
60
Stress in Con. =
Stress in R/f. =
Stress in Con. =
Stress in R/f. =
cm
88.5
-304
173
-3000
0.00
3.8369866 rad
Percentage of Steel
No of Bars
Dia of Bar
1.00%
113.09734
36
20
113.097
kg/cm2
kg/cm2
kg/cm2
kg/cm2

PILE (CASE, SEISMIC) - MIN LOAD
Dia. of section
Modular ratio
Vertical Load
Bending Moment
Effective Cover
=
=
=
=
=
120
10
37
92.50
9.30
cm
Ast.provided
113.097
cm2
N.A.assumed
Ar
C
c.g.
Ixx
Aeff.
e
e'
e - e'
Ieff
Dist. Of N.a
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
34.47898
129.60215
2684.69105
108.58021
39.73529
221237.15832
3702.56707
249.98919
28.81163
221.17756
2694760.92549
3.29061
25.52102
Scott Wilson
t
tm
cm
cm
deg or
cm2
cm
cm
cm4
cm2
25.52102
R=
60
Stress in Con. =
Stress in R/f. =
Stress in Con. =
Stress in R/f. =
cm
105
-2315
173
-3000
0.00
2.2619843 rad
Percentage of Steel
No of Bars
Dia of Bar
1.00%
113.09734
36
20
113.097
kg/cm2
kg/cm2
kg/cm2
kg/cm2
Design of pile cap
Y
3.60
r
0.75
w
t
0.75
1
0.75
3.60
2
X
3.60
u
B
p
r
Y C.g of Pile Cap
Column Size2.22 m x 2.22 m
Depth of Pile Cap

Grade of Concrete
Permissible Flexural Compressive stress
Permissible stess in steel
Modular ratio
Neutral Axis Factor((10*11.67)/(10*11.67+200))
Lever Arm Factor(1-(0.368/3))
Coefficient of Resisting Moment(1/2*11.67*0.877*0.368)
Cover
Equivalent area of square
Side of square
Column width along section 1-1
Column width along section 2-2
0.75
=
=
=
=
=
1.8
M
11.67
200
10
0.368
0.877
1.883
75
4.909
2.220
2.220
2.220
m
35
N/mm2
N/mm2
mm
m2
m
m
m
Design at section 1-1

Normal Case
Pile -1
Pile -2
Pile -3
Pile -4
Pile -5
Pile -6
Dist from face of abut coulmn and cen of piles 1,2&3 =
= (3.6-0.5*2.22)
Effective Depth
1800-12-75-32/2-20/2
245.30
229.85
158.78
214.40
229.85
127.89
t
t
t
t
t
t
2.490 m
1687.00 mm
Along Longitudinal direction

For Pile - 1
Effective Width
1.2a+b1 = 1.2*2.490+1
(Refer cl. 305.16.2 IRC 21-2000)
a=
distance of the cg of load from face of support
b1=
3.988/2<3.6 Hence no overlapping
Actual beff is
0.5*3.988+0.75
Load per metre run 245.296/2.744
Moment due to soil above pile cap
(2.490+0.75)*(-)**1*(2.490+0.75)/2
Moment due to Self Weight of Pile Cap
Scott Wilson
3.988 m
2.490 m
1.00 m
2.744 m
89.39 t/m
1.890 t-m/m
18.896 t-m/m
4.35
(2.490+0.75)*(-)**1*(2.490+0.75)/2
Moment per metre run due to pile -1
89.394*2.490
Net Moment per metre run
222.590-1.890-18.896
Depth required
SQRT(201.805*10^7/(1.883*1000)
Ast required
Assumed dia of bar is
Spacing required is
Assumed Spacing
Ast Provided is
Percentage of reinforcement provided
No.of Bars in Transverse
((0.75+3.6+3.6+0.75)*1000-2*75)/125+1
Check for Shear
(As per Cl 307.2.5.4 of IRC 21:2000)
For Piles-1,2&3
Distance of CG of Pile From Pier Face
Diatance of Outer Face of Pile Form Face
Distance of Section for Shear Check From Pier Face
Portion of Pile Out Side the Section
Shear force acting due to piles
Total Width of Pile Cap
Total Load
Shear Stress
The Allowable Shear Stress is as per Table 12B of IRC:21-2000
Allowable shear is
Provide Shear Reinforcement
222.59 t-m/m
201.805
1035.19
6820.03
32
164
125
8947.26
0.53
70
2.490
3.090
1.69
1.000
245.30
8.70
777.72
0.53
t-m/m
mm
mm2
20 mm
mm
mm
mm2
%
no.s
0.317 N/mm2
312.044 t
No.of legs
Dia of bar
Spacing required
12*(PI()*12^2/4)*200*1687/(312.044*10^4)
Spacing Provided
12 L -12mm dia @100mm c/c along longitudinal direction
12
12
146.745
100
No.s
mm
mm
mm
Minimum Shear reinforcement criteria as per Cl 304.7.1.5 of IRC: 21-2000

No.of legs
12
Dia of bar
12
Spacing required
140.806
12*(PI()*12^2/4)*0.87*415/(0.4*(0.75+3.6+3.6+0.75)*1000)
Spacing Provided
100
No.s
mm
mm
mm
Check For Punching Shear ( As Per Cl 307.2.5.5 of IRC 21:2000)

Max reaction on pile -1
Availaible Arc length at pile -1
O.K
m
m
m
m
t
m
t
N/mm2
Shear reinforcement shall be provided to carry a shear Vs = V-Tcbd
Area of Shear Reinforcement provided

12*(PI()*12^2/4)/(100/1000)
O.K
O.K
13571.68 mm2/m
245.30 t
4395.76 mm
(PI()*(1000+0.5*1687)/2)+1500
Effective depth
Shear
245.296*10^4/(4,395.763*1687)
Allowable punching shear is 0.16*sqrt(Fck)
Scott Wilson
1687.00 mm
0.331 N/mm2
0.947 N/mm2
O.K
Design at section 2-2

For Pile - 1 & 4
Effective Width
1.2a+b1 = 1.2*2.490+1
(Refer cl. 305.16.2 IRC 21-2000)
a=
distance of the cg of load from face of support
b1=
3.988/2<3.6 No Over laping
Actual beff is
3.988/2+0.75
Total load for piles 1, 4
245.30
Load per metre run
245.296/2.744
Moment due to soil above pile cap
Moment due to Self Weight of Pile Cap
Moment per metre run
89.394*2.490
Net Moment per metre run
222.590-1.890-18.896
Depth required
SQRT(201.805*10^7/(1.883*1000)
Effective Depth
1800-12-75-32-32/2
Ast required
Assumed dia of bar is
Spacing required is
Assumed Spacing
Ast Provided is
Percentage of reinforcement provided
Check for Shear
(As per Cl 307.2.5.4 of IRC 21:2000)
For Piles-1,4
Critical Section distance for Shear Check From section 2-2
2.490-1*1.645
half the pile dia
3.988 m
2.490 m
1.00 m
2.74 m
245.30 t
89.39 t/m
1.89 t-m/m
18.90
222.59
201.80
1035.19
1645.00
6994.16
32
160
125
8947.26
0.54
t-m/m
t-m/m
t-m/m
mm
mm
mm2
+ 20
mm
mm
mm2
%
O.K
mm
O.K
0.845 m
0.60 m
Shear at critical Section (i.e at Deff)

Relief in shear due to self weight of pile cap
0.845*2.744*1.8*
Relief in shear due to soil weight above of pile cap
0.845*2.744*(-)*
Total shear
245.296-0.626-0.835
Shear Stress Tv
243.835*10^4/((0.75++0.75)*1000*1645)
The Allowable Shear Stress is as per Table 12B of IRC:21-2000
Allowable shear is
0.63 t
0.83 t
243.84 t
0.540 N/mm2
0.321 N/mm2
Hence Shear reinforcement is required

Shear reinforcement shall be provided to carry a shear Vs = V-Tcbd
99.148 t
243.835-(0.321*2.744*1000*1645)/10000
TotalShear
No.of legs
Dia of bar
Spacing required
8*(PI()*12^2/4)*200*1645/(99.148*10^4)
Spacing Provided
No.of Bars in Longitudinal
((0.75+3.6+0.75)*1000-2*75)/(0.5*125)+1
184.28
8
12
161.54
100
81 no.s
Minimum Shear reinforcement criteria as per Cl 304.7.1.5 of IRC: 21-2000

No.of legs
8
Dia of bar
12
Spacing required
297.622
Spacing Provided
100
Area of Shear Reinforcement provided
8*(PI()*12^2/4)/(100/1000)
Scott Wilson
No.s
mm
mm
mm
No.s
mm
mm
mm
9047.79 mm2/m
O.K
FLYOVER -287+298.350
CALCULATIONS FOR LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY OF PILE
INTRODUCTION : -
DESIGN DATA : Type of pile

Diameter of Pile
Length of Pile (from pile cap bottom)
Founding Level
Pile Cap Bottom Level
Pile Cap Thickness
Ap =
X-sectional Area of Pile
Factor of Safety
=
Bored cast-in-situ
=
dia
=
=
len
=
fdlvl
=
=
=
plcatl
=
=
plcath
=
p * dia*dia/4
=
1.20
25.0
-25.0
0.00
1.50
1.131
2.5
m
m
m
m
m
m2
FOS
=
=
29.0 deg
20.096
16.852
Soil Properties
Angle of Internal Friction at tip
N =
Bearing Capacity Factor (for phi = 29.0 deg)
[As per IS:6403-1981]
Nq =
Bearing Capacity Factor (for phi = 29.0 deg)
Cohesion at Pile Tip

Density of Soil
=
=
Cp
=
=
=
0.0 t/m2
19.00 kn/m3
1.938 t/m3
Bearing Capacity Factor
=
=
Nc
sub
=
=
28.26
Effective Unit Weight of Soil at pile tip
0.938 t/m3
BEARING CAPACITY CALCULATIONS

VERTICAL LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY CALCULATIONS
(By Static Formula, Appendix B, IS:2911(PartI/Sec2)}
a)
End Bearing
The ultimate bearing capacity in end bearing (Q P) for piles in C - soil is given by
QP =
Ap * [ ( NC*CP ) + ( 1/2 * D * g * Ng + PD * Nq ) ]
As per IS:2911-(1/2), for calculating effective overburden pressure, depth corresponding to 15 times diameter of pile shall be considered.
Layer >>
Upto
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
PD at
-25.0
-7.0 2.19481
2.19
2.19
2.19
2.19
2.19
2.63
0.46
0.00
0.00
0.00
Depth of layer from bottom
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
1.131 * [ ( 28.256*0.00 ) + ( 0.5*1.20*0.938*20.1 + 16.267*16.9 ) ]
2.50
=
2.50
0.0 + 322.8
2.50
2.50
=
2.50
322.8 t
Total
= 16.27 t/m2
0.00
25.00
b)
Side Friction
The ultimate bearing capacity in side friction (Q S) for piles in C - soil is given by
QS =
ni=1 [ a * Ci * As + K * PDi * tan * Asi ]
Soil Properties as per Bore Hole No.1 (Depth below 2.0m G.L)
Coefficient of Earth Pressure
S.No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
1.49
1.49
1.49
1.49
1.41
1.41
1.41
1.41
1.41
1.41
1.41
0.00
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
25.0
sat
sub
PD1
PD2
PDavg
Asi
2.65
2.65
2.65
2.65
2.65
2.65
2.65
2.65
2.65
2.65
2.65
0.779
0.779
0.779
0.779
0.879
0.879
0.879
0.879
0.879
0.879
0.879
1.928
1.928
1.928
1.928
1.878
1.878
1.878
1.878
1.878
1.878
1.878
0.928
0.928
0.928
0.928
0.878
0.878
0.878
0.878
0.878
0.878
0.878
0.000
1.855
4.175
6.494
8.813
11.008
13.203
15.398
17.593
19.788
19.788
0.000
4.175
6.494
8.813
11.008
13.203
15.398
17.593
19.788
21.982
21.982
0.000
3.015
5.334
7.654
9.911
12.106
14.301
16.495
18.690
20.885
20.885
0.000
9.425
9.425
9.425
9.425
9.425
9.425
9.425
9.425
9.425
9.425
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
322.8 + 675.369
Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Pile

Net Bearing Capacity as per static Qnet
formula
Density of Concrete
Self Weight of Pile (Buoyant)
=
Net Bearing Capacity of Pile
Qu / FOS
1.131 * 25.0 * (2.4 - 1.0 )

=
399.0 - 39.6
Net Vertical Load carrying Capacity of Pile (excluding selfweight) =
Scott Wilson
1.0
The total ultimate bearing capacity (Q U) for pile

QU
QP + QS
=
Therefore
Depth Depth of
from GL
Pile
2.00
4.50
7.00
9.50
12.00
14.50
17.00
19.50
22.00
24.50
27.00
=
=
=
Say
=
=
Say
998.2 t
998.2
399.3
399.0
2.4
39.6
ton
ton
ton
t/m3
t
359.4 t
359.0 ton
359.0 t
CAsi
Load - t
0.000
0.000
0.000
15.752
0.000
27.869
0.000
39.985
0.000
51.777
0.000
63.243
0.000
74.709
0.000
86.176
0.000
97.642
0.000
109.108
0.000
109.108
0.000 675.369
675.369
HORIZONTAL LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY CALCULATIONS

{Append. C , IS:2911(PartI/Sec2)}
The maximum lateral load on any pile under normal condition shall not exceed the value corresponding to 5mm horizontal deflection (produced at cut-off level)
The lateral load capacity, depth of fixity amd maximum moment in pile is calculated as per Append. C of IS:2911(PartI/Sec2)-1979. Minimum value of lateral load
capacity is adopted for Design.
Depth of Fixity
Depth of Fixity for pile (LF) is given by plots in Fig. 2 (Append.C) of IS:2911 between L F/R or LF/T.
Where
LF =
Depth of Fixity
L1 =
Here
Height above ground level of Lateral Forces

(EI/K1)1/4
R =
Grade of Concrete
Dia of Pile
E =
Young's Modulus of the Pile Material (i.e. M35 grade concrete)
=
pi * (dia)4 / 64
I =
K2 =
Constant (from Table 1 of Append. C)
Therefore
T =
L1 =
( E * I / K1)1/5
1.2 m
=
=
=
=
=
(for Fixed Head Piles)

for Fixed Head Piles in Preloaded Clays, from Fig.2 of Append.C
LF/T =
Depth of Fixity
Therefore
LF =
2.2 * R
Pile Head Deflection (Y) is given by
Q ( L1 + LF)3/ 12EI
Y =
or
Q =
Where
Q =
and
Y =
M 35
=
=
2.2 * 3.56
2.96E+06 t/m2
0.1018 m4
0.526 Kg/cm3
526.0 t/m3
3.56
0.0 m
2.20
7.835 m
(for Fixed Head piles, refer to Cl. C.1.3 of

Append. C)
12EI * Y / ( L1 + LF)
Lateral Load Capacity

5 mm
(Maximum Deflection, as per Design Criteria)
0.005 m
37.59 ton
37.59 ton
46.9 ton
Therefore
Q =
=
12EI * Y / ( L1 + LF)3
12 * 2,960,000 * 0.102 * 0.005 / (0.0 + 7.83)**3
i.e. Lateral Load Carrying Capacity of Pile under

Normal Condition
Therefore
QSEISMIC =
1.25 * 37.6
Thus, Lateral Load Carrying Capacity of Pile
Under Normal Condition
Under Seismic Condition
Maximum Moment in Pile
Fixed End Moment in Pile is given by
MF=
Q ( L1 + LF) / 2
=
=
Qlat
37.59 ton
46.90 ton
(for Fixed Head piles ,

Append. C)
refer to Cl. C.2.1 of
and Actual Maximum Moment in Pile is given by

m * ( MF )
M =
or
M =
m * Q ( L1 + LF) / 2
Where
m =
for L1/T =
m =
Therefore
M =
Reduction Factor
(from Fig. 3 of Append. C, corresponding to L 1/R or LF/T)
0.00
0.96
and piles in Pre loaded clays

(from Fig. 3B of Append. C)

m * Q ( L1 + LF) / 2
M =
=
0.96 * Q * ( 0.0 + 7.83 ) / 2
=
3.76 * Q
Therefore
Maximum Moment in Pile =
SUMMARY OF DESIGN FORCES
Vertical Load Carrying Capacity of Pile
Lateral Load Carrying Capacity of Pile
Scott Wilson
3.76 * Q
tm
where Q is Lateral load in tons
=
=
359.0 ton
449.0 ton
=
=
=
37.6 ton
46.9 ton
3.76 * Q tm

Design of Pile and Pile Cap Final

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Исходное описание:

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Design of Pile and Pile Cap Final

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Patna ROB's (Package -VIII)

Design of Abutment Pier and its Foundation

SUMMARY OF LOAD CASES

Vertical Load (t)

Vertical Load (t)

Vertical Load (t)

C) Forces and Moments at the Base of Pile Cap

Patna ROB's (Package -VIII)

Design of Abutment Pier and its Foundation

Design Pier of dia 2.5m

SOLID CIRCULAR SECTION SUBJECTED TO AXIAL THRUST AND BENDING

Patna ROB's (Package -VIII)

Design of Abutment Pier and its Foundation

Patna ROB's (Package -VIII)

Design of Abutment Pier and its Foundation

SOLID CIRCULAR SECTION SUBJECTED TO AXIAL THRUST AND BENDING

SOLID CIRCULAR SECTION SUBJECTED TO AXIAL THRUST AND BENDING

Live Load Calculations

100 x 23.826 / 27.9

55.4 x 23.236 / 27.9

IRC class A, two lanes

Reaction Rb for three lanes

IRC class 70W+A

Maximun Transverse moment Case/ Maxmium Reaction Case

One lane of class 70-R(W)

One lane of class-A

27.2 x 23.741 / 27.9

IRC class A, three lanes

Reaction Rb for three lanes

Horizontal Braking Force

Summary of loads transferred on Pier from Super Structure

Max. Longitudinal Moment

Braking Vforce (t)

For Max.Transverse Moment

For Max. Longitudinal Moment

Max. Longitudinal Moment

Braking Hforce (t)

Braking Vforce (t)

For Max. Longitudinal Moment

IRC 70R Loading

For Max Longitudinal Moment Case

IRC Class A Loading

For Max Longitudinal Moment Case

Total Load Span 1

For Maxmium Transverse Moment Case

Total Load CG from R Span 1

DEAD LOADS OF SUPERSTRUCTURE

LEVER ARM WRT C/L OF BRIDGE

LEVER ARM WRT C/L OF BRIDGE

NET FOOTPATH LOADS

PCC FILLING LOADS

LEVER ARM WRT C/L OF BRIDGE

LEVER ARM WRT C/L OF BRIDGE

TOTAL IMPOSED LOAD ON DECK SLAB

TOTAL DIAPHRAGMS WEIGHT

GIRDERS SELF WEIGHT

DECK SLAB LOADS

AREA OF MIDDLE DECK SLAB

( 0.143 + 0.25 ) X 0.5 X ( 3.975 + 0.625 / 2 )

TOTAL SLAB LOAD

TOTAL DEAD LOADS

DEAD LOAD REACTION

Patna ROB's (Package -VIII)