Tva 00005120

DRAINAGE SYSTEM PIPE DESIGN
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
COMPUTATION COVER SHEET
TVA
Client
KIF Gypsum
Project
Disposal
Project/Proposal
GR373I
Task
Facility
TITLE
OF COMPUTATIONS
COMPUTATIONS
DRAINAGE SYSTEM
BY
Name
Printed
and
ASSUMPTIONS
CHECKED
PIPE DESIGN
Title
Sowm? Bulusu
Staff Engineer
AND PROCEDURES
BY
signature
Peer Reviewer
Name
Printed
and
COMPUTATIONS CHECKED
BY
Title
Tamer Y. Elkady
Engineer
saL
Signature
Ou.Le..cr
O5t
11106
DATE
Name
Printed
and
Title
Basak Gulec
Engineer
COMPUTATIONS BACKCHECKEDBY
Originator
Qs1 10110
Sigrateue
DATE
Name
Printed
and
Sowmya
Bulusu
Title
APPROVED BY
?/J
stgnature
DA E
PM or Designate
Printed
and
Name
Title
Neil
2 r?c6
Davies
Principal/Vice
President
APPROVAL NOTES
REVISIONS
NO.
caic-cover-PIPE
Number
SHEET
DESIGN.doc
and
initial
all
DATE
revisions
BY
CHECKEDBY
APPROVAL
5/10/2006
06
Written
Sowmya
by
Date
Butusu
06
/04
ient
TVA
Project
Fossil
Kingston
Basak
Date
Gulec
Facility
No.
ProjectlProposai
06
/05
/03
yy
MM
DD
Task
GR3731
25
of
DD
Gypsum Disposal
Plant
by
Reviewed
/12
MM
YY
No
06
DRAINAGE SYSTEM PIPE DESIGN

PURPOSE OF ANALYSES
The purpose of
corridor
Plant
used
pipes
preformed
to
The proposed
which
system
referenced
referred
to
disposal
the
have
proposed pipes
at
the
Fossil
Analyses
were
to withstand
resistance
structural
drainage
Kingston
facility.
disposal
adequate
of the
performance
located
facility
KIF Gypsum
as
that
Phases
is
10W427-9
sluiced
with a geotextile
wrapped
2 of the
disposal
to
is
pipes
minimize the potential
DC pipes
will
facility
facilitate
facility
diameter
DC
pipes
this
permit
of the
dewatering
gypsum
head on the
lift
station
in
liner
the
Gypsum
will
in
turn
in
order
collected
pump
and
The purpose
area
Water
system.
which
system for
slurry will be
to settle.
disposal
length
a gravel
I0W427-5
Drawing
application.
the
within
of the proposed drainage
and then allowed
herein
pipes
running along
embedded
are
flow
a gravity
is
HDPE
polyethylene
in
The
disposal facility
an underdrain
to
12-in.
disposal
shown on Engineering
of
of hydraulic
buildup
be conveyed
density
Plan layouts
are
as part
to
Gypsum
facility.
filter.
facility
included
respectively
high
pipes
of the disposal
from the dewatering
DC
DC
corridor
southwest
and
of six perforated
drainage
KIF
system for the
drainage
consists
as
to
northeast
of the
gypsum
evaluate
to
OF THE DRAINAGE CORRIDOR SYSTEM
DESCRIPTION
the
that
verify
proposed
herein
is
package
loads.
applied
media
the
in
site
peninsula
calculation
this
by
to
the
the water into
the stormwater pond.
In addition
gravel
to
DC
the
media of the
collected
pipes a 24-in diameter
central
from Phases
corridor.
and 2
to
decant
outlet
The purpose of
the underdrain
lift
this
DO
is
pipe
pipe
to
is
embedded
water
decant
convey
in the
station.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS
Pipe Structural
Calculations
withstand
are
the loads
will
be checked
iv
excessive
GR3731\pipe
Stability
are
performed
applied
bending
design-TVA
on
wall
strain.
bg_doc
to
it
verify
with
crushing
Plastic
the
proposed
an adequate
ii
pipe
wall
can
DC
factor
buckling
of
and
pipes
safety.
Failure
iii excessive
be designed
to
DO
resist
pipe
are
able
mechanisms
ring deflection
failure
by
the
to
that
and
above
Written
iat
Sowmya
by
Date
Bulusu
06
/04
W
TVA
Project
mechanisms
Fossil
Kingston
using
by
Reviewed
/12
MM
Basak
Date
Gulec
methods
the
in
presented
No.
Project/Proposal
Facility
technical
GR3731
06
/05
/03
Yy
mAf
DD
Task
No
Chevron
literature
25
of
DD
Gypsum Disposal
Plant
design
Page
06
Phillips
2003.
active
will
truck with
sum of the
by
applied
which can be calculated
the
truck
The
is
due to
The
full.
total
stresses
2003
Phillips
ft
operation
of soil/aggregate
applied
cover
to be applied
on the pipe
stress
conditions
active
are assumed
traffic
and the
layer
The
condition.
3
two
for
be estimated
anticipated
when
lb
by Chevron
7p
will
post-closure
stresses
the gravel
as described
PL
pipes
traffic
wheel load of 40000
total
stresses
DO
and
ii
in areas where
that
be maintained on top of the pipe.
loaded
the
assumes
and
condition
operation
condition
DC
on the proposed
Stresses applied
the
by
the loaded
by a
is
then
truck
as follows
ItWL
L-D
HC.
where
PL
on the pipe
stress
pcf
average unit weight of the overburden materials
yp
H
D
of the overburden materials
thickness
CH
pipe
outer diameter
load
coefficient
D/2H
WL
L
effective
Phillips
if
the
During
above
pipe
2003
condition
i.e.
Phillips
2003 Table
for dynamic
of pipe which
3
shorter than
post-closure
the pipe
accounting
length
is
ft.
Chevron
1 which
is
a function
of
Ib
factor
impact
ft.
L/2H
and
wheel load
II
materials
psf
gravel
ft
if
loads and
is arbitrarily
pipe
is
longer
defined
than
as follows
3 ft and
by Chevron
actual
pipe
length
3-ft.
the
stress
gypsum
applied
and
final
to the pipe
is
cover soils.
due to the overburden
This
stress
is
calculated
as follows
PL EypH
stress
on the collector pipe
average unit weight

thickness
GR3732\pipe
design-TVA
psf
of the overburden materials
pcf
and
of the overburden materials ft..
bg.doc
AMMOMOL
Written
by
Sowmya
Date
Bulusu
06
/04
yy
lent
TVA
Project
Wall Crushing
Wall
by
Reviewed
/12
Gypsum Disposal
Facility
can occur when
crushing
the
Basak
Date
Gulec
compressive
on the pipe wall can be calculated
by
the
strength
in the
stress
of the pipe
the following
SP
No.
Project/Proposal
pipe
wall
material.
Chevron
equation
06
/05
YY
m4.1
Task
GR3731
due
25
of
DD
R.Qm
Plant
pressure exceeds
vertical
stress
Fossil
Kingston
Page
to
/03
DD
No
06
external
The compressive
Phillips
20031
-D
288
where
S
pipe
Pt
vertical
pipe
load
outside
pipe wall
The
wall compressive
pipe
wall
recommended
in
reported
compressive
long-term
the Chevron
Wall Buckling
external
vertical
system.
The
in.
is
compressive
wall
the
f?C
critical
may
buckling
design
wrinkling
buckling
SF
the
pressure
be calculated
_5.65
in
using
pipe
allowable
SF
safety factor
buoyancy
wall
buckling
reduction
Hw
groundwater height
cover above pipe
elastic
support
12?SDR-1
pressure
soil
modulus of
elasticity
SDR
standard
GR3731\pipe
design-TVA
reaction
dimension
bg.doc
above pipe fft.
ft.
modulus of
psf
R1- 0.33
4e
o.ovsH
for pipe bedding
of the pipe material

ratio
of the pipe.
wall
the following
RB E
factor
factor
HDPE
pipe
The
value.
stress
is
800
psi
can occur when
of the pipe/bedding
where
Pwc
material
for a
value
as
2003.
a longitudinal
exceeds
an allowable
to
compared
strength
Phillips Manual
pressure
and
in..
stress
Wall buckling
allowable
to the
applied
diameter
thickness
psi
pipe psf
stress
psf
psf and
the
aggregate
equation
Written
by
Date
Bulusu
Sowmya
06
/04
TVA
Project
Based
pressure
is
applied.
Excessive Ring Deflection

a
causing
reversal
of
are
deflection
can lead to substantial
the
to
Modified Iowa
AX% _
the
can
wall
pipe
An
ring deflection
AX
horizontal
deflection
deflection
lag factor
bedding constant
Di
inside pipe
Pt
pipe
factor
the critical
buckling
of
large
addition
is
of the pipe
external
vertical
excessive
calculated
ring
using the
0.061E
in diameter
or change
assume 1.5 Chevron
vertical
pressure
short-term
modulus
of
SDR
standard
dimension
modulus
in
2003
2003
Phillips
Phillips
in
dianieter
of 7.5
minimum
Ring deflection
assume 0.1 Chevron
ring deflection
over-deflection
In
AX%
allowable
06
soil
No
Task
2E
-? SDR-1
crown
DD
KL
144
where
/03
RM
2003
Phillips
100
/05
than
where
occur
system.
aggregate
Chevron
AX
is less
a horizontal
loss in flow capacity.
D1
06
is anticipated.
pipe/bedding
Forxnula
Pt
GR373I
2003
Phillips
on the pipe
stress
No.
Project/Proposal
in Chevron
vertical
of curvature
applied
Facility
Excessive ring deflection
pressures
Spanglers
Disposal
no buckling of pipe wall
calculated
Date
Gulec
YY
presented
If the total
Basak
25
of
DD
Gypsum
Plant
recommendation
on
safety of 2
Fossil
Kingston
by
Reviewed
/12
MM
YY
at
Page
of
psf
of the pipe material
elasticity
reaction for pipe bedding material
psi
psi and
ratio.
is
assumed
based on guidance from Chevron
Phillips
2003J.
Bending Strain
Excessive
the pipe wall.

pipe/bedding
Chevron
Bending
aggregate
Phillips
strain
When
a pipe
occurs
system.
deflects
in the
Bending
pipe
strain
under load bending
wall
is
as
external
calculated
strains
pressures
using
the
are induced
are applied
following
in
to the
equation
20031
dX 2C
b-fdD D
D.
ra
where
GR3731\pipe
design-TVA
bg.doc
Written
by
Date
Bulusu
Sowmya
06
/04
TVA
Project
Fossil
Kingston
sb
0.5
mean
D
D
An
based on
varying
Based
deflection
allowable
For
on
stress
the
Chevron
for allowable
2003
2003
Phillips
strain
bending
AX
is
1.5
to 1.5%
from the
literature
by Wilson-Fahmy and Koerner
recommended
is
up
8% are
to
in Chevron
as conservative
in the literature
reported
to
recommended
is
6 where
2.25%
4.
fd
for
and
information
calculated
very
is selected.
USED
characteristics
5% is reconunended
6.
fd
as conservative
IN
1994
Chevron
in
and
1994
Phillips
as acceptable
for
Ay assumed
neglecting
conservatively
deformation factor
66
19911.
allowable
a factor of safety
stresses.
that
recognizing
Phillips
recommends an
This range incorporates
intensity and time duration of applied
above
fd of
the
equal
effect
6 was also
to
the
of arching
ring
an
selected.
ANALYSES
DC and DO
of the
from manufacturers
literature
to be used in structural
pipes
Chevron
Phillips
2003
stability
calculations
as
are as follows
DC pipes
12-in.
nominal diameter
nominal
HDPE
D
outer diameter
minimum
wall thickness
mean diameter
\pipe
design-TVA
bg.doc
Dm
SDR-7.3
average inner diameter Di
GR3731
Phillips
years.
between
strainof 5
estimated
06
in.
strains
based on Equation
is
strain
with
that
from
strain
PARAMETERS
The
No
Task
GR373I
and
thickness
of 4.2%
strain
noted
of 50
period
This range
is
it
allowable
bending
DD
guidelines.
bending
where
a design
An
ASSHTO
of
strain
bending
allowable
2003
/03
P4d
manufacturers
allowable
An
wall
are recommendations
following
pipes
plastic
pipe
outer diameter
pipe
/05
YY
in
diameter
pipe
- 1.06
06
in
in
Chevron
pipe wall thickness
1.06
No.
ProjectlProposal
in diameter
or change
deformation shape factor
fd
Facility
Disposal
from outer fiber to wall centroid
distance
Date
Gulec
deflection
vertical
Basak
25
of
DD
Gypsum
bending strain
OX
C
The
Plant
by
Reviewed
/12
MM
YY
Page
12.75
in.
1.747
in.
9.046
in and
10.898
in.
Written
by
Date
Bulusu
Sowmya
06
/04
TVA
Project
Fossil
Kingston
For proposed
Plant
Reviewed
/12
Gypsum Disposal
Basak
by
mm
ient
Page
Facility
Date
Gulec
No.
Project/Proposal
GR3731
25
of
06
/05
/03
YY
AUf
DD
Task
No
06
DO pipe
24-in. nominal
HDPE
D
diameter
SDR-9
nominal outer diameter
minimum
wall
thickness
24 in.
2.667 in.
inner diameter Di
average
D.
mean diameter
18.346
in and
21.173
in.
Pipe Perforation Sizing
For proposed
DC pipe
d85
size of the pipe
particle
weight of the
mm as
for which
57
are finer assuming
particles
shown
bedding material
in Figure
1.
Conservatively
to
2 assume
85 percent
by
16 to 22
16 mm 0.630
gravel d85
assume d85
in. and
F
Structural
waste
the
MACTEC
19951.
weight
1995J.
placement.
Since
fine
Dry
The
a majority
grained
gypsum
unit weight
gypsum
design-TVA
bg.doc
in
is
is
and
of the
reported
on the pipe
is
used
at
from
MACTEC
consist of dry stack
will
the plant before
an elevation of approximately 900
rim-ditch
as
indicated
method
for fine grained
upto an
obtained
be dewatered
approximately 107 pcf
of 100 pcf
DO
will
above
is
analyses
material
by-product
is
these
which
will be placed
gypsum
a unit weight
active-operation
\pipe
gypsum
of 100 pcf
DC
pcf.
The overburden
stack
of the gypsum on the pipes
Stresses on
GR3731
100
of gypsum
unit weight
of dry stack
Fine grained
120 pcf and
gypsum
to the disposal facility
transported
120 pcf
cover system
final
gypsum and fine gypsum.
unit
1.2.
materials
bedding gravel layer
Information.on
and
of overburden
weight
-
The
1.2
Stability
Unit
20041
from
factor varying
gypsum
in
feet.
MACTEC
of sluiced
material
MACTEC
20041.
elevation of approximately 900 ft will

in
the analyses
for overburden
is
it
be
gypsum.
pipes
condition
3.0 ft
Written
by
Sowmya
Date
Bulusu
06
/04
YY
0-nt
TVA
Project
Fossil
Kingston
Plant
WL
Page
Reviewed
/12
Basak
by
Gutec
Gypsum
Disposal
Facility
lb
40000
No.
Project/Proposal
Chevron
I1
impact factor accounting
effective
CH
load coefficient
outer pipe diameter
for dynamic
a standard
Phillips
loads
2.0
post-closure
length
12.75
24.0
ft
in.
20031
Phillips
2003
DCpipe
0.242 for proposed
DO pipe
for proposed
and
DC pipe
DO pipe.
condition
bedding layer gravel

final
loaded
for proposed
0.140
for proposed
in.
06
3 ft
Table
DD
2.5
Chevron
of pipe
/03
mN
No
Task
GR3731
assumed based on
truck
ft
/05
YY
wheel load
1.061
06
Date
DD
FAt
25
of
3.0
ft
3.0 ft
cover system
waste
218
thickness of waste only excluding
ft
cover and gravel

see Figures
thicknesses
221-3
i.e.
final
218
ft.
3 and
2 and
3.01202181003.0120
6Rax
22
520 psf
156.39
psi
Wall Crushing
Pt
vertical
ay
allowable
pressure
applied
pipe wall
to the pipe
compressive
psi
115200
stress
800 psi
psf
Chevron
Phillips
20031
Wall Buckling
SF
safety factor
Hw
groundwater
height
Due
to
the
anticipated
that
of water during
of the
pipe.
herein the
above pipe
relative
the
ft
of the
high permeability
central
facility
Therefore
height
drainage
layer
will facilitate
it
is
drainage
and therefore reduce head on top
operations
for the
corridor
gravel
purpose
of water above
the
of the
pipe
HW
analysis
is
presented
assumed
to be
zero.
GR3731\pipe
design-TVA
bg.doc
Written
by
Sowmya
Date
Bulusu
06
/04
YY
.en
TVA
Project
Fossil
Kingston
Facility
224
2 and
modulus of
soil
modulus of
06
/05
MM
elasticity
for proposed
for proposed
final
Task
No
psi Table
2
3
of the pipe material Table

for 50 years
@ 73F
and
DC pipe
DO pipe.
Excessive Ring Deflection
deflection
lag factor
bedding
Di
inside pipe
assume 1.5 Chevron
assume 0.1 Chevron
constant
9.046
diameter
in.
18.346
short-term
modulus
1.58 x 107 psf
modulus of
soil
DO pipe
of pipe material @ 73F
for proposed
110000 psi Chevron

reaction
Phillips
for pipe bedding
20031
material
Chevron
distance
from outer
1.06
0.5
deformation shape factor
D.
mean
\pipe
outer diameter
D - 1.06
10.898
in.
for proposed
21.173
in.
for proposed
pages for calculations.
design-TVA
bg.doc
and
diameter
CALCULATIONS
GR3731
to wall centroid
thickness
fd
pipe
See following
fiber
pipe wall
pipe
DC pipe
DO pipe.
wall
3000
Phillips
Excessive Bending Strain
20031
2003
DCpipe
Phillips
for proposed
in.
of elasticity
Phillips
thickness
/03
DD
06
gravel
cover
for pipe bedding
28200 psi
9.0
GR3731
of gypsum
height
ft
reaction
7.3
No.
Project/Proposal
3000
4.06 x 106 psf
SDR
Date
Gulec
25
of
YY
see Figures
4.32 xI05 psf
Basak
DD
Gypsum Disposal
Plant
by
Reviewed
/12
oA4
cover above pipe
Page
psi
2003
Written
by
Sowmya
Date
Bulusu
06
YY
let
TVA
Project
Kingston
Fossil
Plant
/04
WA4
Gypsum
/12
Reviewed
by
Basak
Disposal
Facitity
Project/Proposal
\pipe
design-TVA
bg.doc
No.
GR373I
06
Task
PERFORMANCE
25
of
PROPOSED DC PIPE
Date
Gulec
DD
CALCULATIONS FOR STRUCTURAL
GR373
Page
/05
MM
No
/03
DD
06
Written
Sowmya Bulusu
by
Date
06
/04
YY
TVA
Project
Fossil
Kingston
10
Page
Basak
Date
Gulec
06
DD
Gypsum Disposal
Plant
by
Reviewed
/12
MA1
Facility
No.
Project/Proposal
PROPOSED DC
GR373I
25
of
Task
/05
/03
MM
DD
No
06
PIPE DESIGN
Pipe Type
Name
Norminal
Minimum
nominal
wall thickness
Dimension
Ratio
of
pipe
HDPE
diameter
Pipe
12151in
1.747
in
9.046
In
diameter
inner
Average
Standard
12-in
Outer Diameter
Di
SDR
7.3
Pipe Perforation Sizing

Material
Factor varying from
1.2
t57 gravel
assuming
- 2.0
F
dh..
d85/F
16
Stress
Active
on
16-22mm
d85
1.2
13.3
mm
0.52
inch
Use
0.50
inch
collector pipe
Operation
Condition
Impact
Unit
weight
Thickness
Factor
Length of
pipe
of overburden
soil
of overburden
soil
Load
WL
Load
Wheel
40000
IE
2.5
3.0
lbs
YP
0.140
PL
_
?rP
3-ft
L/2H
ft
Ca
Phillips
if
pipe
2003
2003
3-8 L
Chevron
Ha
Phillips
20031
Table
L D
psf
Closure
Condition
Post
Layer No.
I
Final
yP
l00
Waste
3 Liner
PO
120
Cover
120
System
Closure
H ft
Condition
ypxHpsf
360
3.0
218.0
21800
360
3.0
4
5
Total
Maximum
GR373
\pipe
design-TVA
Vertical
Stress
bg.doc
22520
length
If
pipe
D/2H
0.50
4752_
Post
actual
pef
coefficient
Phillips
Chevron
Note L
ft
120
From Chevron
From
22520
psf
156.39
psf
156.39
psi
psi
0.18
3-ft
CiEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
Written
ent
by
TVA
Date
Bulusu
Sowmya
Project
Kingston
Page
06
by
Reviewed
/12
Gypsum
Plant
Fossil
/04
Disposal
Facility
Basak
No.
06
/0S
No
Task
GR3731
25
of
Date
Gulec
Project/Proposal
/03
06
Wall Crush
Allowable Compressive
Actual
Wall
Stress
6y
stress
compressive
Pi
288
570.68
800
psf
1?20tI
L
psi
From
Chevron
Phillips
2003
From
Chevron
Phillips
2003
From
Chevron
Phillips
2003
D
t
800
psi
OK
psi
Wall Bucklin?
Height
Height
of
water
of WasteFinal
above
Pipe
Cover above
Pipe
table
modulus of elasticity
modulus of
Ha
H
E
of pipe
ft
224
ft
4060800.0
reaction
soil
432000.0
5.65
psf
psf
73F
psi
For 50
3000
psi
From
Chevron
Phillips
2003
From
Chevron
Phillips
2003
From
Chevron
PhitIips
2003
years
BE
SF
28200
12
?SDR
where
RI
Water
Coefficient
0.33
Elastic
Factor
Allowable
Critical
Buckling
-H
Factor
1.0000
1.0000
of
\pipe
design-TVA
SF
Safety
Pressure
PE
GR3731
bg.doc
14
and
Support
Buoyancy
of
Hw
Pwc
68307
Pwc
Yes
psf
OK
e-0.fi65-
12
Page
Written
by
Sowmya
Bulusu
Date
06
/04
Y1
TVA
Project
Kingston
Fossil
Plant
MAXIMUM
Ring
Deflection
Usinp
the
/12
Reviewed
Gypsum Disposal
Facility
D.
Basak
Date
Gulec
No.
Project/Proposal
GR3731
06
/05
/03
YY
FA1
DD
No
Task
06
RING DEFLECTION AND RING BENDING STRAIN
Modiied Spanpler Equation
K-L
144
by
DD
A?Itt
25
of
2E
SDR-
AX
L
K
P
0.061-9
E
L
1.5
0.1
22520.00
9.046
Change
in
diameter
horizontal
constant
bedding
Crown
pipe
factor
lag
Vertical
modulus
short-term
modulus of
the
Chevron
psf
in.
110000
psi
3000
psi
SDR
IChevron
0.
of
Phillips
the pipe
Philiips
20031
reaction
for pipe
dimension
2003
Phillips
20031
psf
elasticity
20031
diameter in
in
material
psi
material
bedding
psi
ratio
Chevron
Phillips
2003
ring deflection
100
Di
soil
or change
1.5 Chevron
Pressure
of
Phillips
standard
c1X%
deflection
assume
assume
@ 73 F Chevron
SDR
maximum
deflection
inside
AX/Di.
nine
diameter
in.
7.3
AX
0.45
in.
AX
AX%
.1U
Di
4.93
Ring
ea
RinQ BendinQ
Strain
bending
7.5% OK
Deflection
strain
AX maximum vertical
2C
bfd
Dm Dm
AX
D.
10.898
Dm
mean
C
Bending
strain
Eb
0.926
1.06
fd
deformation
distance
0.5
fd
pipe
pipe
wall
or
change
in
diameter in
outer
pipe
thickness Chevron
Phillips
fiber to wall centroid
wall
thickness
Chevron
in.
Phillips
in
4.17%
Bending
Strain
5.0/g OK
..
GR3731\pipe
design-TVA
bg.doc
20031
factor
shape
from
t.06
deflection
diameter in
2003.
Written
by
Sowmya
Date
Bulusu
06
yy
Oent
TVA
Project
Kingston
Fossit
Plant
13
Page
/04
MM
G?um
12
Reviewed
by
Basak
Date
Gulec
DD
Disposal
Facility
Project/Proposat
No.
GR3731
PROPOSED DO PIPE
GR3731
\pipe
design-TVA
bg.doc
06
105
f03
YY
64N
DD
Task
CALCULATIONS FOR STRUCTURAL PERFORMANCE
25
of
No
06
Written
by
Date
Bulusu
Sowmya
06
/04
TVA
Project
Kingston
Fossil
Reviewed
/12
Wt
vY
0nt
14
Page
Date
Gulec
o6
/05
/03
vY
MM
DD
DU
Gypsum Disposal
Plant
Basak
by
Facility
No.
Project/Proposal
PROPOSED DO
GR3731
25
of
Task
No
06
PIPE DESIGN
Pipe Type
Name
Norminat
Outer
Minimum
Stress
Active
Dimension
on colector
Operation
ofpipe
24
18.346
SDR
in
trine
Condition
Wheel
Impact
Load
Unit
weight
Thickness
of
overburden
of
overburden
Load
WL
Factor
Length of
40000
2.5
I1
pipe
soil
3.0
yP
soil
coefficient
lbs
120
3
4393
Chevron
From
Chevron
Phillips
Phillips
ifpipe
3-ft
2003
2003
3-ft
L/2II
ft
Post
Final
ra
Cover
Waste
3 Liner
System
pcf
Closure
H ft
120
3.0
I00
218.0
120
3.0
Chevron
Phillips
20031
Table
I Wt
LD
psf
Condition
yP
H Pso
360
21800
360
5
6
Total
GR373
\pipe
design-TVA
Vertical
Stress
bg.doc
22520
length
D/
Maximum
actual
0.50
Condition
Layer No.
If
pipe
pcf
0.242
CH
From
Note L
ft
PLyPHC.
Post Closure
Pipe
in
in
2.667
diameter
Ratio
HDPE
diameter
wall thickness
inner
Average
Standard
nominal
12-in
Diameter
22520
psf
156.39
psf
156.39
psi
psi
2H
033
3-ft
Written
by
Date
Bulusu
Sowmya
06
TVA
Project
Fossil
Kingston
/12
/04
YY
.en
15
Page
Gypsum Disposal
Plant
by
Reviewed
Basak
Date
Gulec
DD
IdAd
Facility
No.
ProjectlProposal
06
/05
/03
YY
AA4
DD
Task
GR3731
25
of
No
06
Wall Crushing
Allowable Compressive
Wall
Actual
Stress
6y
stress
cotnpressive
115200
P
288
703.66
800
psf
psi
From
Chevron
Phillips
2003
From
Chevron
Phillips
2003
From Chevron
Phillips
2003
D
t
800
psi
OK
psi
703.6620422
Wall BucklinQ
Height
of
water
Height of WasteFinal
above
table
Cover above
modulus of
of
elasticity
modulus of
HW
Pipe
Pipe
pipe
reaction
soil
0
224
ft
ft
4060800.0
psf
28200
psi
432000.0
psf
3000
psi
From
Chevron
Phillips
2003
From
Chevron
Phillips
2003
From
Chevron
Phillips
2003
years
5.65
73F
For 50
SF
12
SDR
where
Water
Coefficient
Elastic
Factor
Allowable
Critical
Factor
Buoyancy
of
Buckling
H
H
0.33
Support
of
Pressure
\pipe
design-TVA
bg.doc
B
SF
Safety
Pt
GR373
and
1.0000
1.0000
Pwc
47735
Pwc
Yes
psf
OK
- o-obs
-H
GEOSINTEC CONSULTANTS
Written
by
Sowmya
Date
Bulusu
06
/04
TVA
Project
Kingston
Fossil
Plant
MAXIMUM
Ring DeRection
Usinje
D-
144
Gypsum Disposal
Facility
maximum
0.061-E
1.5
0.1
Pt
22520.00
Di
18346
110000
3000
SDR
diameter
/03
An
m.t
No
Task
06
Equation
AX
/05
STRAIN
deflection
horizontal
lag
K
P
pipe
the
modulus
Chevron
psf
of
SDR
standard
L1X%
ring
Di
in
diameter in
20031
Phillips
Phillips
20031
reaction
20031
the
20031
material
pipe
psi
for pipe
bedding
material
psi
ratio
Chevron
Phillips
20031
AX/Di.
eine
insi
of
elasticity
Phillips
dimension
deflection
100
psi
change
Chevron
Pressure psf
of
soil
Phillips
in.
psi
1.32
Vertical
modulus
@ 73 F Chevron
AX
Crown
short-term
or
1.5
assume 0.1 Chevron
constant
bedding
deflection
assume
factor
?SDR-1?
in
GR3731
AND RING BENDING
Change
No.
Project/Proposal
K-L
?73
06
v4
RING DEFLECTION
2-E
Date
Gulec
25
of
uD
the Modired Snantler
AX
Basak
by
Reviewed
/12
MM
0.
16
Page
diameter.
in.
in.
AX
AX %
-.100
D.
7.19
Ring
4
Ring Bending
Strain
bending
bJd
D?
2C
D
D.
Dm
D.
21.173
C
Bending
\pipe
design-TVA
bg_doc
strain
Fb
1.414
pipe
deformation
distance
0.5
fd
OK
deflection
or
change
from
1.06
wall
diameter
in
outer
pipe
thickness
Bending
Chevron
Phillips
2003
factor
shape
fiber to wall
wall
thickness
in
4.99%
in
mean pipe diameter in
D-1.06
fd
GR3731
strain
AX maximum vertical
4X
7.5%
Deflection
Strain.
5.0%
OK
centroid
in.
Chevron
Phillips
2003.
Written
So -A?a Bulusu
by
Date
06
/04
Project
Fossil
Kingston
Plant
Reviewed
/12
Basak
by
Date
Gulec
pp
NM
yy
TVA
17
Page
Gypsum Disposal
Facility
No.
Project/Proposal
GR3731
25
of
O6
/05
/03
YY
MM
DD
Task
No
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

Assumptions
DC
Proposed
pipes
12-inch
DO
Proposed
SDR-7.3
perforated
HDPE
SDR-9.0
solid pipe
of proposed pipes
Pipe bedding consists of
Minimum 2.5-ft
vehicles
Analysis
Structural
pipe
pipes
24-inch
Installation
HDPE
are permitted
summary and
57 stone crushed
of drainage
gravel
to pass
and cover
soil
placed
before
construction
over the pipes.
conclusions
Stability
For proposed
DC pipe
Wall crushing
Pipe wall compressive
stress
570.68
Allowable compressive
psi
stress
800 psi
4 OK
Wall buckling
Allowable
critical
buckling pressure
68307
Total vertical
psf
22520 psf
Ring
deflection
Bending
For proposed
strain
4.93
4.17
%
%
allowable
allowable
ring deflection
7.5
5% 4 OK
strain
stress
on pipe
4 OK
% 4 OK
DO pipe
Wall crushing
Pipe wall compressive
stress
703.66 psi
Allowable compressive
stress
--
800 psi
OK
Wall buckling
Allowable
critical
buckling pressure
47735
psf
Total vertical
OK
4 OK
22520 psf
Ring
deflection
7.19
S
GR3731\pipe
design-TVA
bg.doc
allowable
ring deflection
7.5
stress
--
on pipe
06
Written
10
t
by
Sowmya
TVA
Bulusu
Project
Date
Kingston
Bending
Based
on the
under the active
GR3731\pipe
Fossil
strain
above
06
yy
Plant
4.99
/04
Gypsum
results
bg.doc
/12
mm
and post-closure
design-TVA
18
Page
Reviewed
Disposal
Facility
allowable
the
Basak
by
Date
Gulec
pp
5% 4
strain
specified
conditions
Project/Proposal
GR3731
perform
KIF Gypsum Disposal
Facility.
are
06
/05
/03
YY
A9N
DD
Task
No
06
OK
to
pipes
for the
No.
25
of
anticipated
satisfactorily
Written
by
Date
Bulusu
Sowmya
04
06
TVA
Project
Fossil
Kingston
Plant
by
Reviewed
/12
Basak
Date
Gulec
Gypsum Disposal
Facility
25
of
06
/05
WF.?1
DD
A4P?1
wt
19
Page
ProjectlProposal
No.
GR3731
Manual
2.
Task
No
/03
DB
06
REFERENCES
Chevron
Chemical
Chevron
Chemical
Chevron
Phillips Chemical
PP 900 Chevron
MACTEC
Law
Use
Plant
Phillips
66
Bensenville
of Coal
Combustion
Testing
for Parsons
Driscopipe
p.
188
Company 2003
Design
System
Manufacturers
Bulliten
literature
p.
as Engineered
By-Products
Fills prepared
by
MACTEC.
Laboratory
prepared
76
IL 1994
Company Performance Pipe
currently
2004.
Engineering
Plexco/Spirolite
Phillips Chemical
Engineering
Fossil
Company
1995.
MACTEC
System
Results
EC
- Samples
on behalf of
Design
from Gypsum Pond
TVA May
Manufacturers
Cumberland
at
13.
literature No.
1089-91
A17
Phillips
-Drexel
66
Company
1991.
Wilson-Fahmy
Behavior
in
R.F.
Leachate
and
Koerner
Collection
University Philadelphia
GR3731\pipe
design-TVA
bg.doc
R.M
Finite
and Removal
PA
1994 105 p.
Element
Systems
Analysis
Geosynthetic
of Plastic
Research
Sewer Pipe
Institute
Written
?lient
by
Sowmya
Date
Bulusu
06
Project
Table
1.
Load
L3I2H
Kingston
Fossil
Plant
/04
Basak
Date
Gulec
Gypsum Disposal
Facility
Philfips
Project/Proposal
No.
GR373I
25
of
06
/05
DD
CH Chevron
Coefficient
by
Reviewed
/12
MM
YY
TVA
20
Page
/03
DD
AH.R
No
06
20
20_0
Task
20031
Lr2H
.w._
0.2
0.1
03
0.$
1.1
0.019
0.037
0.053
0_067
02
0037
0_072
0_103
0.131
0_6
?.5
0_7
0.8
0_9
9.U
12
1.5
0.089
0_097
0.103
0.108
0.112
0_117
0121
0_124
0.127
0.174
0.189
0_202
0211
4219
0.229
0_238
42411
0_248
0252
0_274
0_232
0.306
0.318
0_333
0 346
0.355
0.361
0 320
o 3 d9
Q 373
0.3131
0_485
0_425
1_442
0.454
0_462
0.463
0.481
0.5t35
0.525
0.
0.524
0_544
0_572
0.596
0613
0.3
0.053
0_103
0.149
0_190
4?
0 067
0.190
0241
05
0079
0155
0224
0.284
0.336
0_379
0.414
0.441
0_6
0_089
0_171
0_252
0 320
0_379
0428
0467
0_7
0_097
0.189
0-274
0.349
0.414
0.467
0511
0.546
0.574
0597
0_628
0.655
0.674
08
0.103
0.202
0-M
0.373
0.441
0.499
0.546
0.584
0_615
43_639
0.674
0.703
0_725
0_740
09
0_108
0 211
0306
0_391
f1_d63
i.52d
o_57it
0.615
0.647
0.673
0_711
0.743
0_766
0_783
10
0.112
0-219
0_318
0405
0_481
4.544
0.597
0_639
0.673
tt.701
0.740
0.775
080d
o 8t8
0-224
?.
-.
131
d99
540
55fl
0 625
6B
__
0.117
0_229
0_333
0.425
0505
0.572
0.628
0.674
0.711
0_740
0 783
0.821
0849
0_871
1.5
0-121
0.238
0346
0422
0525
0.596
0.655
0_703
0_743
0.775
0.821
0_863
0.895
0.920
2.0
0.12d
0241
0.355
0454
0.540
0_613
0.674
0.725
0_766
Q 8tU0
0.849
8_895
0_930
0968
20.0
0.127
0-248
0361
0_462
T 558
t3.688
0_74t1
9_818
0_871
0.920
1960
1_0l0
GR3731
\pipe
design-TVA
bg.doc
0.625
U_783
Date
Bulusu
Sowmya
by-
06
/04
YY
Client
TVA
Project
Table
Fossil
Kingston
Bureau of Reclamation
2.
Deflection
Chevron
Basak
Date
Gulec
Facitity
06
w
No.
Project/Proposal
Average Values of
for
Task
GR3731
Iowa Formula
Initial
Phillips 20031
hat
af Sedtir?
Degree
GOtnprateficu7
A4oaerate
Std
- pipe bedding
type
iratetkV
Svht
Pfocw
tJrtiffed
Proctor
9596
Pro
409b-706
70%
Telarsre
85%
GfassrT?cntiost-?Mped
40%
reYative
soiTs
Firre-grakwd
mecirum
witit
Ctl
refafire
CL
CL-ML
Jtdt
No data
consu1t
avaitabie
no
25%
srlh
otherwise use
LL5U
sotls
sons engineer
a competent
plastiefty
CH-AdEI
Adifi.
F1tIe-gianled
???
LL50
to iroh
denW
??
rlensity
Sasels
High
48.6-35%
PJStkq
coarse
50
200
4tlt
1000
100
400
1000
2000
2000
?OQ
3000
gtalttett
partACtes
stx7s
Ftrre-grakied
SvrJs
CL ML
svrth
medium
t.Lf50
no
25%
with
CL-AfiL
to
pfastncq
coarse
gr?rirted
arficp-ls
sris
Caarse-grairel
GM
GC.
Contwtts
129b
soft
Coarse-gratne6
wr2h
GP SW
UWI
J29b..
eontarns
.._...
._.........
SM
in
frnes
SCO
ltnes
ffnes
or no
little
200
SPff
_.
_._
__.
....
ruck
terms of
1000
fines
Ciustred
Accwacy
wg1r
percentage
__._..
...
1000
3000
3000
2%
2%
1%
E1_5%
deffeCtToPfT
fi
ASTM
2487
smbds
between
tdote
i.e_
2%
USBR
GM-GC
bedding
vaWs.
5q3.000
mitiat
tails
fEVr1%
Latuid
timit.
accuracy and
03r
predicted
ariy borderline
of
deitectiort
on
only
deflectiorf.s
the
for tiNs
less
than 50
otdy appmpriate
borcfertwe
between
tvwo
ft
15 m. No
dettection
ccxnpxion
Lag
safety
Factor
catee3ortes
factor
rrwst
select
be
wrttr
beginTirv
aduat
included
one
ot ttlese
ctettecton
would be
vatues_
For use
Proetor
design-TVA
based
on
bg.doc
laboratory
ttie
in table
for
appkeci
lower
maximum dry den.stty

irm test
tlme AfiTM D 698 4ASFTt T-39 USBR 3esiqrration E-41_ 1lbn2
Percentage
GR3731\pipe
scaE
3%
and 4%_
- Yalm appeable
predk
LL
E-3.
Designation
GC-SC.
WKj-term
value
standards
6.895
or
deflections_
average
wing 12500
KPa_
the
in
Ei
toro
i4W
25
of
DD
Gypsum Disposal
Plant
by
Reviewed
/12
Am
.......
Written
21
Page
.........
/05
WA
No
/03
nn
06
Written
by
Date
Bulusu
Sowmya
06
104
Vl
Client
TVA
Project
Table
3.
Kin
Typical
on
Fossil
Elastic
Plant
Shsxt-Tasu
tQh
200h
1000
IOy
50
? Typical
y
values
GR3731\pipe
Mt3.0
2069
1743
lkfrsdWlus
841
E25.4
1083
710
865
749
490
92_8
Date
Gulec
Project/Proposal
FOMpst 0fPa
crt
GR3731
No.
Phillips
25
of
06
/05
/03
YV
IHM
DD
Task
No
7empamtura
10038
12049
1I0_0
104.l
65.0
50.0
8?i
759
ffiM
449
345
73
f23j
14060
79_8
6I_0
57.5
46_3
30_5
23.5
550
421
396
323
210
162
54.3
51.2
374
353
42.8
288
27.2
20.3
I89
244
60.7
i_4
43_7
35.7
23.2
17_9
419
320
t301
246
160
123
93.0
90.6
52-7
403
39.0
31.0
641
550
363
278
262
214
20.2
15_5
139
107
774
67_1
43_9
33.5
31_6
25_8
16_8
534
463
303
23I
218
178
I16
23.0
15.0
11.5
I41
159
103
79
691
599
39.1
29.9
476
413
270
206
bamd an
design-TVA
PISTl4f
638
bg.doc
testucg
of molded
plaque
autefiaI
specimens_
06
20031
130_0
6016
1172
122.0
640
170.0
971
738
Facility
404
240_9
107.0
Basak
DriscoPlex Chevron
for
Etrestir
0-18
by
DD
Gypsum Disposal
LvaDwzom
3040
Reviewed
/12
64t
Modulus
20 Z9?
22
Page
12_4
Written
Client
by
Sowmya
TVA
Bulusu
Project
Date
Kingston
Fossil
06
Plant
23
Page
/04
Gypsum
/12
Reviewed
Disposal
Facili
by.
Basak
Gulec
Project/Proposal
Date
No.
GR3731
25
of
06
Task
/05
No
/03
06
a
8
0
d
cs
OOZ
oN
OOt
0N
f oN
---------------------------o
d
0
--------------------------?
ut
--------------------.._
o
d
----------------------0
9
-w c
---------------------------3
o.9
o
B
?
o
.
8
S
R
e4i
Figure
GR373I\pipe
design-TVA
1.
Grain Size Distribution
bg.doc
Curve
for
57 Stone

Tva 00005120

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Tva 00005120

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

DRAINAGE SYSTEM PIPE DESIGN

DRAINAGE SYSTEM PIPE DESIGN

minimize the potential

of the proposed drainage

and then allowed

from the dewatering

system for the

OF THE DRAINAGE CORRIDOR SYSTEM

the water into

the stormwater pond.

pipes a 24-in diameter

which can be calculated

wheel load of 40000

be maintained on top of the pipe.

average unit weight of the overburden materials

of the overburden materials

due to the overburden

on the collector pipe

average unit weight

of the overburden materials

of the overburden materials ft..

can occur when

on the pipe wall can be calculated

cover above pipe

above pipe fft.

for pipe bedding

of the pipe material

can occur when

Excessive Ring Deflection

can lead to substantial

assume 1.5 Chevron

assume 0.1 Chevron

loss in flow capacity.

Excessive ring deflection

no buckling of pipe wall

reaction for pipe bedding material

based on guidance from Chevron

the pipe wall.

under load bending

by Wilson-Fahmy and Koerner

This range incorporates

intensity and time duration of applied

average inner diameter Di

pipe wall thickness

deformation shape factor

from outer fiber to wall centroid

nominal outer diameter

Pipe Perforation Sizing

size of the pipe

are finer assuming

consist of dry stack

the plant before

an elevation of approximately 900

for fine grained

approximately 107 pcf

of the gypsum on the pipes

120 pcf and

to the disposal facility

gypsum and fine gypsum.

bedding gravel layer

elevation of approximately 900 ft will

impact factor accounting

outer pipe diameter