Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1
:sai<11:> "nJ"d . ewn 696S XOQ "O "d
IW!1 'lfc!Vdl:>
-a.
()
+-'
"-
Cl
<I>
er:
S
:::I
c:
c:
<(
--~-
Thmiland
Sri Lnkm
we re trained in post-harvest
technology. Use of this tech
nology in some countries is being
tested, other countries are
adapting it to local situations,
and still others are recording
widespread farmer -acceptance.
(See Thrust VI II and Social
Science Department sections).
Both farmer and experimental
stores are shown on these pages.
COVER PHOTO - Ex perimental
potato store under evaluation
in Colombia, South America.
Chile
Tunisia
Npml
Colombi
Peru
Nepal
Contents
~
Cover Photo . . . . . . . ..
(Insid e front cove r)
Director General's Message . . . . . . . . .
iii
Board of T rustees ... ... ... . . . . . . .
v
CIP Research Sites .. .
vi
C IP Donors 1981 ... . . . .
vii
Regional Headquarters
vii i
Survey of Research 1981 ..
ix
Thrust I - Collect ion and Classifica tio n of Tuber- Beari ng Solanums
Thrust 11 Ma intenance Ut il ization and Distribution of Tuber3
Bearing Solanums . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thrust Ill - Control of Important Funga l Diseases .
. . . . . .
15
T hrust IV - Control of Important Bacterial Diseases
21
Thrust V - Control of Importa nt Virus Diseases
. . . . . . ..
27
Thrust V I - Con trol of Important Ne matode and Insect Pests
35
Thrust V 11 - Physiological and Agronomic Management of Potatoes
47
Thru st VI 11 - Development of Storage and Processing Technology
57
Thrust IX - Seed Product ion Technology .. .. . . . . . .
63
Regional Research and T rai ning
73
Social Science De partm ent
85
Train ing and Communications Department
97
Publications by CIP Scie ntists . . . . . . . .
105
Research and Consulta ncy Contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
Staff . . . . . . . . . . . .
109
Financial Statements
11 3
ii
,4
l,
the reviewing and planning of their program which CIP is conducti ng. Furthermore at the 1982 internal review, CIP will
be the firs t Center to have in attendance
members of a TAC quinquennial review
team.
Due to ClP's development strategy the
economic pressures on the CG IAR system
have had little if any effect on CIP's
program. The quality of researc h bei ng
produced, the quantity of relevant technology in CIP's transfer system, and
CIP 's ability to transfer technology with
national scientists into growers' fields
contin ue to increase even th ough CIP's
real costs are slightly decreasing.
Richard L. Sawyer
Di recto r General
In ternational Potato Cen ter
CIP's MANDATE
As one of the worldwide network of centers funded by the Consultative
Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIA R). CIP has t he following mandate:
"To develop, ad apt and expand the research necessary for the technology to solve priority problems that limit potat o production in developing countries. This includes adapti ng the collective knowledge that has
contributed to the stepwise increase in potato production in devel oped
countries.
" The World Potato Col lection which has been accumulated by CIP p rovides ampl e opportunity for research breakthroughs through t he exploitation of th is large quantity of p reviously unavailable genetic resources."
iv
Board of Trustees
---.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Dr. J oab L. Thomas (Chairman)
Office of the President
P.O. Box B,
University, Alabama 35486
USA
Phone: Office (205) 348-5100
PROGRAM COMMITTEE
Dr. Enrique Ampuero
lnteramerican Development Bank
Project Anal ysis Department
Agricultural Development Division
808 17th St. N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20577
USA
Dr. E. R. Keller
Professor of Swiss Federal Institute of
Technology
Crop Science Department
Ch-8092 Zurich
SWITZERLAND
Phone: Office 01 32 62 11
Home (01) 830 33 80
lf:;::=;:;:;:':':'J
Altitude
Desert
~=~~=~m Highlands
La Molina
mm
San Ramon
Lo w, Humid Tropics
r--------,
L2'~r~m;~!s J
{meters)
5,000 t----+-------------+--------__._----~
-
'
------:-'
Temperature
Station
La Molina
Huancayo
San Ramon
Yurimaguas
Latitude
(S)
Altitude
(m)
1205
12007
1108
5041
240
3,280
800
180
oc
Max
(mean)
Min
(mean)
Mean
Rainfall
(mm)
22
21
30
31
16
5
18
21
19
13
24
26
15
720
2 ,000
2 ,134
vi
22 Jun
22 Dec
Range
11:25
11:25
11:28
11:49
12: 50
12:50
12:46
12: 28
01:25
01:25
01: 18
00:39
.. I
x
x
x
x
French Government . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .
x
x
Philippines Government . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
x
x
x
x
x
x
vii
Spanish Government .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . .
...
Special
Project
x
x
Regional Headquarters
REGION I
Andean Latin America
CIP
Apartado Aereo 92654
Bogota B, D .E .. Colombia
REGION II
Non-Andean Latin America
CIP
c/o EMBR APA
Caixa Postal (1 1) 1316
70 000 Brasilia, D.F .. Brasil
REGION Ill
Tropical Africa
CIP
P.O. Box 25171
Nairobi, Kenya
REGION IV
Near and Middle East
CIP
P.K. 9
Menemen, Izmir, T urkey
REGION V
North and West Africa
(Francophone)
CIP
11 Rue des Orangers
Ariana, Tunis, T u nisia
REGION VI
South Asia
CIP
c/o NBPGR
IARI Campus
New Delhi, 110012, India
CIP
c/o PCARR
Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines
T HRUSTS
The International Potato Center uses the term " Thrust" to refer to
integrat ion of research projects into units of common research activit ies.
Each of the nine Thrusts has a Coordinato r responsibl e for the unification of project activities within that Thrust. Thrust activities in developing
countries are coordinated by Cl P's Regional Research and T raining organization. Five research Departments serve as administrative units for grouping
personnel according to their professional discipline and for allocating
project funding. The Department of Training and Communications, the
Department of Social Science and the Department of Regional Research
and T ra ining are support units.
Various research disc iplines cooperate through the Thrusts to develop
techno logy for low income farmers.
viii
'...
'
'
xi
Thrust I
Collection and Classification of Tuber-Bearing Solanums
from the wild germ plasm collections of CIP following careful comparison with herbarium specimens
of the Smithsonian Institute, Washington, D.C. Germ plasm distribution of 680 accessions were made as
true seed or tubers to CIP research
departments, Japan, Peru National
Programs, URSS, and USA.
Valuable Collections
New Species
Institution
39
96
200
38
4
52
73
168
10
680
Drawings of new potato species, So/anum burtonii and So/anum sawveri, are viewed by their
namesakes, Dr. Glynn Burton (center), longtime member of CIP's Board of Trustees, and
Dr. Richard L. Sawyer (right) CIP's director
general. Pointing out details is Carlos Ochoa ,
who discovered the new species and who heads
CIP's Department of Taxonomy.
Thrust II
Maintenance, Distribution and Utilization of
Tuber-Bearing Solanums
Table 11 1.
World Potato Collection.
Hybrid seed combining resistances to
pathogens within Andean potato cultivars.
Combining Resistances
Number
female
parents
13
6
14
30
35
6
53
18
(Sub-total 1751
LB + PS
LB + RK
LB + PVX
LB + PVY
BW + PVX
BW + RK
PS + GP
PS+ RK
SR+ PVY
PVX + PVY
AK+ PVX
GP + G. rostochiensis (FR)
1
2
2
1
1
2
8
1
1
3
4
2
Earliness
(Sub-total 28)
1
1
2
3
LB+ BW + GP
LB+ PS + PVY
LB+PVX + PVY
LB + RK+GP
BW + PVX +AK
BW + PVX + GR
RK + GP + GR
(Sub-total 10)
TOTAL
213
Seedlings
screened for:
Frost
Late blight
PVY!!/
PVY!Y
common strain
PVY!Y
+ F) x
Seedlings
Survivors
O/o
Survivors
2055
1778
878
878
347
533
469
850
17
30
53
97
necrotic strain
Tuberization percent
--------:;;<>
,/ ,
,,..,,.."'
16h light
24h light
801--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~,~~~--,;<~~:.__~~~~-
1st. cuttings
2nd cuttings
,'
,, '
60
0
L x E*
374068.4
x
LTXYBK
LxE
374080.2
x
LTXYBK
Mx E
Atzimba
x
DT0-33
ExE
Atlantic
x
DT0-33
ExE
LT-2
x
M. Tropical
Figure 11-1. Percent tuberization of single leaf node cuttings from seedlings.
PLRV Resistance
Check clones
Percent of
population
18
..
10111213141516171819202122 23242526
Figure 11-3. Tuber yield distribution of PLRV resistant clones of first year seedlings,
San Ramon, January-Apri l 1981.
Percent of
population
Check clones
L T -2, L T -1, OT0-2
22
18
14
10
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Bacterial Wilt
Breeding for resistance to bacterial wilt, Pseudomonas solanacearum, concentrated on three groups
of genetic material. The first group
consisted of 24 highly selected resistant clones derived from S. phureja.
These clones were intercrossed and also crossed with several
sources of resistance different from
S. phureja. Eight percent of 30,000
seedlings survived following screening with pathotype 013, race 3 of
P. solanacearum. Eighteen clones
from earlier cycles of selection had
a survival rate of 90-100 percent
when grown in an infested field.
Average yield per plant was 1.1 kg.
The second group was derived
from tetraploid x diploid crosses.
The diploid resistant parents were
selected from a population consisting of the two wild species
S. chacoense and S. sparsipilum and
the cultivated species S. phureja.
The tetraploid parents came from a
population adapted to the lowland
tropics and selected for earliness.
From 343 clones grown under hot
conditions and after a second field
evaluation only 19 clones were
retained. Despite cases where two
genomes were contr ibuted from a
wild parent, excellent tuber shape
and yields of up to 1.45 kg per
plant were recorded. The average
yield of the population selected for
further breeding was 1.34 kg per
plant.
.7442
. 10 59
.2347
-. 1277
.4027
. 1324
-. 1663
.6251
.7 331
.3816
.8058
.0 67 3
.1040
-.2401
.7 371
-.24 55
-.3123
.7570
.4471
.5094
Table 11-4 . Mean t ra it values measured in different fami ly types propagated from true
potato seed *.
Family types
T raits
Germinatio n (O/o)
Tra nsplant surviva l
No. t ubers (log)
Yield (log)
Uniformity**
Tub er size
Multiline
Single
cross
Open
pollinated
Self
92.2 a
40.7 a
2.39 a
.77 a
5.46 b
.02 a
88.5 b
40 .4 a
2.37 a
.75 a
5 .89 a
.02 a
87.7 b
39.5 b
2.24 b
.54 b
5.84 a
.02 a
85.2 c
39.6 b
2.13 c
.4 5 c
6.0 6 a
.0 2 a
**
Bulk
cross
81.4
39.8
2.43
.79
5 .42
.02
d
b
a
a
b
a
CONTRACT RESEARCH
Tabl e 115. Tuber yield (kg/plant) and uniformity ratings of 10 single and 10 bulk
cross TPS families.
Tuber yield
Uniformity
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
1.059
1.225
1.100
1.234
1.100
1.406
1.108
1.049
1.077
1.042
1.013
1.084
1.222
1.223
0.930
1.281
0.961
1.221
1.352
1.163
ESR
Early clones adapted to San Ramon conditions .
5 very uniform.
1 least uniform
10
Unmarketable
0.16
0 .11
0.16
0.09
0.14
0.15
0.18
0.15
0 .11
0 .11
0.13
0.13
0.08
0.12
0.18
0.10
0.15
0.15
0.12
0.21
4
4
3
5
3
3
2
5
2
4
3
4
2
3
2
4
2
4
3
3
..
Tabl e 11-6. Tuber yield (kg/ plant) and uniformity traits of the 12 promising TPS
families.
Tuber yield
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
377250.7 x 377904.10
377877 .15 x 377904.10
377887.74 x 377877.9
377922.15 x 377964.5
377935.27 x 377964.5
377964.3 x 378017.2
377891.19 x 378017.2
377887 .59 x 377904.1
377933.13 x 377904.1
378015.7 x 377904.1
377887.29 x 377896.12
377887.74 x 377920.37
1 = least uniform ,
Uniformity"
Marketable
Unmarketable
1.331
1.174
1.192
1.115
1.161
1.172
1.310
1.314
1.332
1.520
1.104
1.050
0.1 7
0. 19
0 .06
0 .11
0.07
0.01
0 .08
0.15
0.20
0.10
0. 11
0 .20
5 =very uniform .
11
3
3
4
4
5
4
5
4
3
3
5
4
13
14
Thrust III
Control of Important Fungal Diseases
Sclerotium rolfsii.
Late Blight
TPS fungicidal
tolerance
(g/kg seed)
Treatment
3.7
3.7
2.5
3.7
1.2
0
Dithane M-45
Cupravit
Vitavax
Vitavax + Dithane
PCNB
Control
77 a
73 a
85 a
76 a
72 a
44 b
= 24. 1
Seed treatment by acetone infusion for 10 minu tes. Seeds generally tolerate higher fun gicidal
amounts up to about 5 g/kg seed. The seed tolerance range for PCNB was extremely narrow.
Average of two experiments each w ith four replications.
Soil-Borne Pathogens
Table 111 -2. Effect of fungic idal treatments of artific ially-infested soil o n incidence of
pre-emergence damping-off caused by Rhizoctonia so/ani.
Treatment
Dithane M-45
Cupravit
Vitavax
Vita vax + Dithane
PCN B**
Control
Optimum dosage
(g/kg soil)
Dosage causing
phytotoxicity
(g/kg soill
Average 0 /o
germination
at 28 days *
Average wet wt
at 28 days
(gm) *
0. 1
0. 15
0.1
0.3
0. 15
0
0.5
1
0.4
0.5
0.5
0
83 a
51 b
82a
78 a
43 b
47 b
14.5 a
5.5 cd
12.5 ab
10.9 b
3.8
d
7 .3 c
Tuckey's test
*
.05
16
13.1
3.5
..
17
During the current plant ing season in San Ramon , Rhizoc tonia solani was importan t in the soil-borne
complex . Of various fumigants and
fungicides test ed under laboratory
condit ions Benlate and Vit avax were
Table 111-3. Effect of Dazomet and Ridomil o n pink rot (Phytophthora erythroseptica)
incidence".
Chemical applied (kg/ha)
Dazomet
0
0
0
0
200
200
200
200
300
300
300
300
400
400
400
400
Ridomil 5g
0
20
30
40
0
20
30
40
0
20
30
40
0
20
30
40
3.9
e
2.2abede
0.9 abed
0.5ab
2.4 bede
0.3a
0.7 abe
0 .5ab
2.7 cde
0 .3 a
0 .2 a
0.2a
2.8 a cde
0.8 abed
0.2a
0.2a
Potato variety Ticahuasi was p lanted in a factorial 4 x 4 design in rando mized complete blocks.
Tu bers were d isinfected with sodium hypoch lorite prior to planting. Plots of 3 rows of 3 m at
1 m spac ing a nd 10 hills per row. Dazomet (Basamid, 98!o granu late, BASF) applied 1 mont h
prior t o planting, disked into soil , irrigated, kept u nder plastic tarp during 2 weeks and left
to aerate for another 2 weeks prior to plant ing. Ridomil 5g, applied to furrows at plant ing.
Controls were treated the same as other in all respects except fo r product to be test ed . All
treatments rec eived Fu radan and Temi k at t ime of pl anti ng at a rate of 60 and 25 kg/ha, respec
tively .
CONTRACT RESEARCH
:-
Fungus
R. so/ani
18c
Mycelium
Sclerotia*
28C
Mycelium
Sclerotia*
Beniate
100 g/ml
100 g/ml
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Vitavax
100 g/ml
200
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Cupravit
100
200
28
43
NA
NA
6
11
61
53
Basamid
100
200
38
52
NA
NA
28
44
62
NA
100
200
83
50
NA
NA
47
NA
NA
Dithane
100
200
27
88
NA
NA
80
82
70
40
Poly ram
100
200
80
78
NA
NA
74
73
65
9
82
85
NA
NA
80
88
56
57
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PCNB
fi
Tecto
100
200
71
19
Thrust IV
Control of Important Bacterial Diseases
Selection for bacterial wilt resistance is now made with two races
of Pseudomonas solanacearum before late blight testing.
Resistance sources include Solanum
sparsipilum and S. chacoense as well
as S. phureja. Progenies from the
latter are now performing well in
Brazil, Uruguay, Colombia, Kenya,
and Sri Lanka . Resistant survivors
from over 54,000 seedlings were
identified with some of the advance
selections yielding 1 kg or more
per plant. Wilt resistance in highly
selected clones has survived over
three seasons under severe field
(Table IV-1). Half were distributed to CIP Regions and half were
evaluated for agronomic performance at CIP-Lima. Most clones are
also being field tested for bacterial
wilt resistance in Peru and in other
countries. The source of resistance
to bacterial wilt in all these clones
continues to be S. phureja although
the final incorporation of resistance
genes from some diploid clones such
Table IV 1. Seedling screening for development of potato clones with bacte rial wilt
resistance for export (19801981).
},
NO families
NO seedlings
LBT. survivors
NO cuttings
NO resistant clones
40 ('80/'81)
30 ('81)
12 ('811
9 ('81 /'82)
5,840
10,000
4,000
1,785
607
1,614
458
473
1,234
70
38
23
12
Total 91
21,625
*
73
* As of mid '81 seedlings were not screened in itially for resistance to late blight.
** Data unavailable.
21
Umari
BR 62.5
Cruza 148
BR 63.15
MB 5.39
MB6.1
MB 14:8
MB 34.22
MS36.19
MS82.60
BR 62.5
Cruza 148
BR 63.76
MB 6.42
MB 14.1
MB 42. 11
MB 56.1
MB56.11
MB 60.32
MS 35.4
PSP 30.10
22
~I
....
with isoemerged
demonsCocona,
Table IV-3. Percentage of plants infected (Inf.) with isolates of Pseudomonas so/anacearum 52 days after soi l infestation and persista nce of the bacterium (Per.) in the soil
d etermined b y infection of susceptible potatoes grown in the same pots for an additional 6 0 days.
Test Plants*
Isolates
(and their
biovarl
S. nigrum
Inf.
0 15 (I)
042 (I)
077 (I)
141 (I)
108 (Ill
142 (II)
Average
0
100
30
30
30
20
35
Per.
Cocona
Suikawito
Cresta
Amari Ila
Check
Inf.
Pe r.
Inf.
Per.
Inf.
Per.
Inf.
Per.
Per.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
80
60
10 0
100
60
80
80
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
40
20
20
0
0
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
0
50
100
50
67
52
0
0
10
10
0
0
3
20
20
50
40
40
60
38
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CONTRACT RESEARCH
Research at the University of
Wisconsin confirms the reduction
in decay by Erwinia caratouora following vacuum infiltration wit h different concentrations of calcium
solutions into potato t ubers. Analy ses of periderm a nd cortex tissue by
atomic emission spectrophotometry indicated that bacterial decay
decreased from 48.9 percent to
2.6 pe rcent when the concentration
of calcium increased from 0.1 percent to 0.51 percent in the periderm
and from 0.02 percent to 0.08 percent in the cortex. Similar analyses
were made of periderm samples from
tu hers harvested from a field study
involving different levels of calcium
Erwinia Diseases
Tab le IV-4. Moderately resistant clones to Erwinia chrvsanthemi out of 159 d eveloped
for resistance to frost and late b light (F-L), 120 selected for lowland t ropics (LT ) and
124 diploid clones (DC).
Diameter of rotted area (mml *
at different inoculum concentratio ns
Clone
373 059.9
379483.3
377823.3
(3 7789 1.11 x
Neo tbr. Bulkl
cus 122
OCH 8587
702 199
OCH 10840
OCH 5604
702832
70201 4
H-32 (Checkl
Progra m
4.4 x 106
8.8 x 10s
1.76 x 10 s
6.2
6.8
6.3
3.4
4.75
3.6
0.0
0.0
2.0
F-L
F-L
LT
6.6
4.5
6.4
6.4
5.6
6.2
6.0
6.2
11.1
5.3
3.0
5.6
5.0
3.5
5.75
2.6
4.0
13.3
2.3
0.0
1.0
0.0
LT
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
14.0
DC
DC
DC
DC
DC
DC
DC
Diameter of rotted area (mml 72 h after injecting 0.01 ml of inoculum 5 mm deep in the tuber.
lnoculum concentration expressed in bacteria/ml.
25
"
26
Thrust V
Control of Important Virus Diseases
..
OLD SCHEDULE
MONTHS
Seedlings (TPS)
......
PLRV. lnoc.
......
"'I
NEW SCHEDULE
Seedlings (TPSJ
PLRV - lnoc .
......
Transf. Jiffy
J;tty 7
Outside.,_
Symptomless
1-Hill Plots
3
4
Tubersl
..J....
Select Clones
6
7
Dormancy--:::::l,....
1-Hill Plots
Select Clones
Dormancy~
'7*
Dor"!ancy
........
5-10 Hills
10
11
12
13
Total Time
Saved
(8 months)
14
15
16
17
Clone
5
25
50
11.4
0/5
0/5
0/5
2/5
0/5
3/5
3/5
2/5
1/5
3/5
3/5
4/5
Renacimiento
{susceptible control)
5/5
5/5
5/5
4.2
15.12
23.2
28
...
Table V-2. Recurre nt selection for increasing frequency of PVY immune t etraploid genotypes.
Cross*
SxS
RxS
R1 x R1
R x R
2
2
Generation
of selection
Number
plants
118
617
524
700
/o resistant
genotypes
0
43
60
82
R
resista nt; S = susceptible.
Tu key's w (0.05) : 9.32 .
29
Resistance to PSTV
Table V-3. Sensitized latex distributed to different countries or used at CIP in 1981.
Sensitized Latex " for
Country
Argentina
Bangladesh
Bolivia
Chile
Ecuador
India
Korea
Kenya
Mexico
Netherlands
Pakistan
Peru
Philippines
Turkey
~
CIP
~
Total
PVX
PVY
PVS
5
62
6
5
62
6
21
5
62
6
40
6
21
6
7
3
6
7
3
6
7
3
10
62
10
10
62
3
254
476
730
40
Amounts in ml. ( 1 ml
APLV
.l \PMV
40
6
6
10
62
3
10
10
247
335
241
154
25
257
19
257
582
395
282
276
6
21
= 80 tests).
31
"P78" Disease
Figure V-3. Particles purified from potato with yel low vein symptoms. Crossbanding is visible in all virus particles.
Stained in 1 percent uranyl acetate
pH 4.0.
Hair Sprout
33
Thrust VI
!
,.
NEMATOLOGY
Table Vl-1. Seedling and tuber screening tests for resistance and segregation of
resistance to G/obodera pa/Iida race P4 A.
to
Crosses
No.
seedlings
Resistant segregation
Seedling test
Tuber test
o female/root ball
17.1
11 .8
11 .0
9_0
75.3
7.0
3.3
1.3
0.0
40.7
24.8
10.5
P4 A resistant
P5 A Res.
Susceptible
P5 A Res.
Susceptible
702535
x
x
x
x
x
702535
702535
702698
702698
702698
1380
1481
913
1174
81
Clones
AM-7 26368
AM-73-259
AM-73-508
AM-73605
P4 A (Huancayo)
Field
Self
Field
1.86
0.21
1.40
8.09
1.61
4 .60
3.83
3.48
0.30
0.19
0.35
0.16
Accession
num ber
Resist ance*
S.
S.
S.
S.
S.
S.
S.
S.
S.
S.
S.
S.
S.
Pl243345
WRF 1730
Pl 255219
OKA 3802
HHC 5113
OKA 3775
OKA 5526
OKA 4498
Pl 283102
HHC 4476
Pl 25530
Pl 25529
OKA 4366
4
4.5
4
4
4 .5
4 .5
4
4
4
4-5
4
4
4. 5
bulbocastanum (2x)
capcisibaccatum (2x)
cordiophyllum (2x)
gourlayi (4x)
lignicaule ( 2x)
megistacrolobum (2x)
megistacrolobum (2x)
oplocense (6x)
papita (4x)
sparsipi/um (2x)
stenophyllidium (2x)
stenophyllidium (2x)
vernei (2x)
P4 A = 4; P5A
=5 .
36
Origin
M ex ico
Bolivia
Mexico
Argentina
Peru
A rgentina
Argentina
Argentina
Mexico
Bolivia
Mexico
Mexico
Argentina
Root-Knot Nematodes
275131 .22
276008.16
278072.10
278106.1
278111.18
278111.6
278108.3
Yield
(kg/hill)
Tuber shape
(Scale)*
1.500
1.500
1.200
1.500
2.300
1.200
1.400
4
2
4
3
3
3
4
Fi gure Vl-1.
Quadratic correl ation
(r= 0.82 ) between yield and root development of potat o cultivars grown in a pot at o cyst nematod e (G. p al/ida )-infested
fi eld .
Tuber weight (g)
500
420
+
340
+
260
+
180
y = 4 1.3 5 1" 1 .03x-0.001x2
100
180
260
340
37
420
5 00
60
!
50
Moist soil stored at soc
40
++++++
- - ---
.... ......... ..
20
.
10
2 Days
3 Day s
1 Week
2 Week s
Treatment 1 period
38
3 Weeks
4 Weeks
5 Weeks
Biological Control
Figure Vl-3.
Infection of G/obodera
pa/Iida eggs by Paeci/omyces li/acinus.
Effects on hatching.
Percent infection
39
377019.5, BR63.75, BR63.74, Atzimba and P2C6 adapted to lowland tropics but susceptible to PTM
were used in the crossing program.
A third of the hybrid tetraploid
progeny were resistant under laboratory conditions. Of these, 49 highly
resistant and 143 moderately resistant hybrids field evaluated in
Lima had significantly lower tuber
damage. Inheritance pattern and
the relative high transmission rate
of resistance to the 4x level from
2x level, in addition to recent discovery of new sources of resistance
in diploid and tetraploid cultivated
germ plasm, suggest that breeding
for resistance to this pest should
not be difficult.
A range of glycoalkaloid concentrations as found in potatoes grown
under different environments were
ENTOMOLOGY
Potato Tuber Moth (PTM)
160
140
Synthetic pheromone
trap
120
100
80
60
40
20
3
2
Number of days
40
10
11
12
13
14
Pheromones
Other Pests
Andean Weevil.
Thirty-eight
clones were field evaluated for resistance to Premnotrypes suturicallus.
41
Table V l-5. Yield and resistance of tropical ly-adapted potato clones to mites, La
Mo lina, November-February 1981 .
Clones
damage/pla nt
LT-4
Desiree
DT0-33
Rosita
CEX 69 .1
LT-1
16.6
32.8
21 .6
10.9
18.2
8.0
98.3
90 .8
87.5
33.7
100.0
14.2
LSD 0 .05
0.01
13.6
18 .6
32.2
44.1
PEST MANAGEMENT
Feeding punctures
30
Contro l
~~--------~ o
------------..
0
20
10
x-
14/7
20/7
Wood uh
L.S.D. 5 O/o
30/7
Observation date
42
I
18 /8
Number
Differential host
Races*
of diff.
+
2
>
1; - = Pf/ Pi 1 or <
where Pf = final Population and
Pi = initial Populat ion.
* + = Pf/Pi
44
Table Vl-7. Percent segregation of high degree of resistance (no galls per plant ) to
several species and races of Meloidogyne in selected CIP breedi ng lines.
M. arenaria
M. incognita
Families
tested
378857
378875
378908
378911
378916
378924
378930
378950
Races
Races
61
56
63
54
31
60
45
52
83
64
62
57
44
52
60
50
86
70
57
89
78
60
87
58
76
55
56
77
36
71
47
33
M .javanica
M. hap/a
Combined*
resistance
30
11
41
20
32
40
18
29
0
2
3
2
0
5
2
0
2
42
56
34
22
36
48
62
49
83
74
76
89
49
57
45
40
41
65
80
57
56
81
71
60
,.
45
..
46
Thrust VII
Physiological and Agronomic Management of Potatoes
47
T able V I1-1. Fresh weight of 100 seedlings, 40 days after sowing in different proportions of compost and sand.
Fresh weight
Percent of
Compost
Sa nd
100
50
25
0
0
50
75
100
260.7 a **
144 .3 b
100.7 b
7 .5 c
238.6 a
175.2 b
90.2 c
5.9
d
Rate of 0.3/o
N-P-K-Ca incorporated in the substrate ( 50-200-150-400 mg/kg, respectively) was the only one that
produced vigorous seedlings in a
fertilizer study. The importance of
phosphorus was evident by the
marked recovery of seedling growth
when 400 ppm of P 2 0 5 were incorporated in the substrate 25 days
after sowing in the different solution treatments (Figure VII-2).
Calcium added at a similar rate did
not produce significant effects.
Needs were analyzed for NPK of
potato seedlings grown either in
shade (approximately 50 percent
reduction of full sunlight) or under
direct sunligh t. Under both conditions increasing rates of P2 0 5 resulted in an increased growth response.
Percent of
Peat moss
Sand
(g)
100
75
50
25
0
0
25
50
75
100
140.3 b *
196.8 a
204.5 a
162.8 b
35 .5 c
..
48
10
10
UNDER SHADE
Y= 0.6689 + .0284X
R 2 = .84
DIRECT SUNLIGHT
<t'
= 2.4377 -
R2
.012 N
= .86
No
0 ...__ ____,-----..,.----,-----,-150
200
50
100
0 -=--~----.-----r---....~
200
100
150
50
PPM PzOs
100 seedlings
fresh weight (g)
10
50
R2
= .90
300
600
900
49
1200
1500
Table Vll-3. Effect of different proportions of sodium nitrate and urea on fresh
weight of leaves and roots of 100 seedlings 42 days after sowing. Lima (summer) .
Nitrogen (ppml
NaN03
Urea
100
75
0
25
50
75
100
50
25
0
Leaves
95.5 a*
73.5 b
58.0
43.5
35.5
c
cd
d
Roots
15.0 a
9 .5 b
6.5 be
5.5 cd
2.0
d
Shading Experiments
Yield
1%1
(g/hilll
95.0 a
96.3 a
98.3 a
81 .7 b
272 a*
193 b
172 b
309 a
Shade period
7 days
14 days
21 days
Control
* Mean yields, P
..
Associated crops to provide adequate shade during the establishment period of seedlings in the field
were studied under most stress conditions of the summer season in
Lima and during the hot rainy season
in San Ramon (Figure VII-5). In both
locations one or two rows of potato
seedlings were transplanted between
rows of 65- to 75-day-old maize
and soybean in Lima, or maize and
crotolaria in San Ramon.
The
associated crops were not harvested
until potatoes matured. Rows were
1 meter apart and oriented perpendicular to the sun direction.
Seedling survival was significantly
improved by any of the protective
conditions provided by either maize
or crotolaria plants in San Ramon
where stress was extremely high. In
the Lima experiment, two additional treatments were added by
removing the maize plants 30 days
after potato transplanting. Seedling survival was improved only by
the maize-potato association where
a larger proportion of radiation
was intercepted (Table VII-5 ).
Yield from the different t reatments
suggest that under Lima summer
conditions potato yields would not
be affected if the radiation reduction caused by an associated crop is
less than 15 percent during the
whole growing period and up to
30 percent in the case of relay crops
Table Vll-5. Transmitted radiation, soil temperature at noon (2 cm) and seedling
survival under different crop associations. Lima (summer).
Treatment*
,..
MP-M
M-P-P-M
S-P-S
S-P-P-S
Control
Transmitted radiation**
Soil temperature
Seedling survival
(lo)
(OC)
{lo)
44.2
67.0
75.5
85.3
100.0
25.5
26.0
28.5
29.0
29.5
93.0 a***
85.2 b
77.7 c
72.5 c
76.5 c
51
Temperature (oc)
35
30
.. ...
25
x x):t
II
XX
11
0
)(
xxxxxxxx
00000000
00
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
ee O
0
xxi:t~
A91'
Qy
00
0 0000
0 0 0 0
15
20
XXX)(
)(
I I
XX)()()ICJIC)(xXXXX)()()(xxxX):tXlll
,,,
111111111111
15 h
XO
I QO XXXX
20
Clear plastic
Without mulch
oo
10
15 h
Time (hours)
Treatment
Gypsum c overing the ridges
Straw mulch
White polyethylene
Black polyethylene
Control (uncovered)
Clear polyethylene
52
Mean yields, P
24.9 a
22.5 a
20.4 ab
17.1 b
16.9 b
16.2 b
53
Table Vll-8. Effects of mulch and irrigation on mean yield, San Ramon, dry
season, 1981.
Percent of plants
Ill
II
377935.27 x 377964 .5
DT0-33 op.
50
Yield (t/hal
Control
Irrigated
16.0
21.5
16.4
22.3
Control
Mulch
0
> 60
Table Vll -9. Manipulation of soil environment for 2 months following planting and
its influence on tuber yield, La Molina,
1981.
Yield It/ha)
Day: Night
Control
Soil reflectant
Transparent plastic
Control
Plastic
Reflectant: Plastic
Plastic
Control
DT033
Desiree
24.2
37. 1
25.9
26.0
37.1
26.0
13.4
23.7
5.0
12.4
27.8
12.4
Table Vll-7. Yield of tubers following soil mulch treatment, San Ramon, rainy season,
1981.
Yield (t/ha)
Control
Mulch
Mulch
effect 0 /o
DT02
Desiree
6947.2
374080.5
Mean
19.8
16.8
18.3
23.8
29.1
33.6
15.9
22.8
20.8
24.3
-15
+30
+15
+43
54
Aluminum Toxicity
CONTRACT RESEARCH
55
Thrust VIII
Post-Harvest Technology and Management
1.8
3.4
9.9
2 1.7
1.4
20.3
30.6
28.B
38.1
24.6
B. Field performance
57
Storage
Oesprouted
and
resprouted
Not
resp routed
N sprouts/tuber at planting
light
dark
4 .9
4.8
3.1
2.0
light
dark
.8
.6
1.6
20.0
light
dark
9.3
14.2
7.8
19.6
light
dark
97.1
90.2
97.1
79.0
Yield (t/ha)
light
dark
51.0
48.6
51.3
41.4
58
Treatments
Aphids per
sprouted eve
at planting
010
Healthy plants
in the field
0
10
Light-stored, insecticide
Light-stored, no insecticide
0
13.6
72.5
3.2
Dark-stored, insecticide
Dark-stored, no insecticide
0
12.1
78.6
11.6
L-1
59
60
CONTRACT RESEARCH
Table VII 1-4. Comparison of amino acid content of potato hydrolysate with potato,
milk and egg.
Milligrams amino acid per gram of nitrogen
Amino acid
lsolencine
Lencine
Lysine
Phenylalanine
Tyrosine
Meth ionine
Threonine
Tryptophane
Valine
Potato
Milk
Hydrolysate
260
304
326
285
99
87
237
72
339
407
630
496
311
323
154
292
90
440
361
528
443
303
253
133
275
84
408
61
Egg
428
565
396
368
274
196
310
106
460
= hydrolysate
egg
0.84
0.93
1.12
0.82
0.92
0.68
0.89
0.79
0.89
Thrust IX
Seed Production Technology
63
Light
Seed wt . (mg)
.564
.432
Germination,
petri dishes
(O/o at 12 days)
99.0
97.5
3.0
Emergence, t rays
(O/o at 12 d ays)
99.1
98.4
3.0
5 .6
4.9
0.4
No. leaves/plant
(33 days)
LS.D.05
I]
""
With 01
gibberellic
acid ....,,,
Percent germination
at 9 days
100
CLONE:
80 JA 33.5
Without
gibberellic
acid
II
CLONE :
80 JA 40.7
CLONE:
80 JA 35.4
50
0
150
200
20
Temperature
64
25
20
Treatment
_,
Spiral
DT0-33
Germination, petri dishes
0
( /o at 13 days)
Emergence, flats
( 0 /o at 12 d ays)
Leaves/plant
(33 days)
Straight
Aberrant
L.S.D.os
97
87
65
14
84
58
23
18
na
ns
5.96
6.28
Site
Huancayo
La Mol ina
San Ramon
L.S.D.
20c
Seed
weight
(mg)
+GA
0.70
0.58
0 .57
97
100
100
ns
65
30C
-GA
+GA
80
93
99
2
18
14
1
1
0
10.1
12.8
ns
- GA
Plants/m2
50
100
275
Surviving
plants (0 /o)
<1 g
110 g
10-40 g
>40g
>1 g
74
133
375
219
261
467
119
134
153
16
17
10
354
412
630
4.5
4.8
5.9
53
42
ns
ns
85
1.0
64
41
17
LSD 0.05
Table IX-5. Effect of seedl ing spacing* and hilling** on tuber production in directlysown nursery beds at high population density. Progeny: DT0-33 op.
Number
Number tubers square meter
plants square
meter at
< 1 g 110 g 1030g > 30g Total
harvest
>1 g
Seedling spacil)g: 6x6 cm
With hilling
Without hilling
MEAN
Seedling spacing: 10x3.6 cm
With hilling
Without hilling
MEAN
Total tuber
weight
(kg/m2)
93
95
308
240
752
519
78
95
1
6
831
620
4.3
4.1
94
274
636
87
726
4.2
96
98
97
395
261
328
624
439
532
75
106
1
4
91
700
549
625
4.1
3.9
4.0
:
* Not significant.
Significant at 1/o level for tuber number per square meter.
66
Table IX-6. Field perfor mance of three grades of seed tube rs (DT0-33 op) planted at
a simila r seed tu be r weight rate.
Number
Seed
Seed
tuber
Plant
tuber main stems
square
grade spacing
rate
(cm)
(kg/ha)
meter
g/tu ber
1-5
5-10
10-20
7 _5
15
30
503
481
483
LSD 0.05
> 55mm
Weight multi
plication rate
for 18-55mm
Total
tubers
14.4
11. 1
8.2
3 .9
2.3
1.5
12.2
12.8
10.5
3.7
4 .8
5.8
19.8
19.9
17.8
1.2
.2
ns
ns
ns
32
31
25
Tab le IX-7. Relative yielding capacity*of six sizes of seed t ubers fro m TPS (DT0-33 op)
exp ressed as a percentage of the y ield fro m veget atively propagated tu bers (DT0-33)
of the same size and p lanted at t he sa me spacing.
Tuber size
(g)
Plant spaci ng
(c m)
1-5
5-10
10-20
20-30
30-40
40-50
5
10
15
20
25
25
!.
( O/o)
18-55 mm
> 55mm
Total
185
136
162
147
134
190
22
43
37
28
47
141
125
128
92
109
154
72
Effect of siz e of tubers from TPS on re lative yieldi ng capac ity was not significant.
67
78
62
59
61
82
89
..
Table IX-8. Effect of seed tuber origin and storage conditions on root development
and field performance in two varieties.
Variety
Seed tuber
origin
Yield It/ha)***
4oc
Amb.temp. *
4oc
Amb. temp.*
D~siree
Lima
San Ramon
Huancayo
61
88
151
73
95
126
26.5
28.0
34.5
25.0
14.2
32.4
Rosita
Lima
San Ramon
Huancayo
120
104
163
121
124
183
27.7
26.0
27.7
23.2
21.4
30.2
***
68
TISSUE CULTURE
69
10oc
Expla nt
Shoot tip
Meristem tip
Apical dome
*
Infected
Free
Infected
2
8
9
21
35
0
0
30
19
70
22c
Free
+ leaf primordia
Shipment
Number
8,632
312
52,162
64,075
71
were susceptible although 20 percent had useful degrees of resistance. Further selection may improve this proportion as many
clones had high yield and good
agronomic characters.
Joint research with ICA at the
low altitude station of Medellin,
Colombia, involves evaluation and
selection of germ plasm for resistance to late blight, Phytophthora
infestans, and resistance to bacterial
wilt, Pseudomonas solanacearum.
Late blight tests screened more
than 3,000 clones from which
7 percent of the plants were selected
for further evaluation.
Sixteen
advanced clones tested under field
conditions both with and without
chemical protection were compared
with seven standard varieties including Monserrate Roja, the preferred
type. In nearly all cases the chemical protection enhanced yield even
when resistant clones were compared. However, with most selected
clones the unsprayed yield was
significantly greater compared with
the check varieties indicating good
yield potential of CIP material under both high and low technology
conditions.
Incidence of wilt on the station
was low but three selected clones
are being grown. Likewise, two
other clones, one of which, BR63-65,
selected as the Peruvian variety
Molinera, are being multiplied in
farmers' fields.
Region III. CIP's association with
the Plant Quarantine Station of the
Kenya Government continues to be
one of the most productive projects
for evaluating and distributing improved germ plasm through a Regional program. Kenya provides
land and glasshouse facilities; CIP
provides the screenhouse installations, labor and supplies and provides training in meristem culture
and rapid multiplication to the
Botswana
Cameroon
Guinea
Kenya
Malawi
Malagasy
Mozambique
Nigeria
Rwanda
Sierra Leone
Somalia
Sudan
Tanzania
Togo
Uganda
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Late
blight
5
7
10
10
8
15
14
Bacterial
wilt
Virus
2
1
2
18
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
10
Lowland
tropics
3
3
4
5
2
5
4
10
20
20
9
21
16
3
7
6
3
13
10
5
11
7
12
9
3
2
2
3
6
7
4
1
11
25
19
6
Non-African
Bangladesh
North Yemen
Sri Lanka
CIP Lima
General
adaptation
76
32
1
5
5
..
..
77
No. seedlings
1
2
3
4
18.1
22.6
26.0
24.8
Region III.
Rwanda.
Openpollinated TPS of the local variety,
Montsama, were dried and stored
for different periods to determine
the probable storage period required
for farmers who lacked access to
GA3 . It was concluded that ordinary farmers can use their own seed
and expect adequate germination
after 2 months storage.
A number of seed bed mixtures,
both sterilized and unsterilized,
were tested for seed germination.
Sterilized volcanic soil and sand
were superior to unsterilized. In all
cases volcanic soil was a better seed
bed medium giving up to 84 percent germination when sterilized.
Farmers using unsterilized soil could
expect approximately 65 percent
germination.
ton/ ha
20.3
20.0
8.0
<20
20-30
30-45
> 45
8
12
14
23
33
41
50
48
41
19
7
4
78
Table R RT-4. Yield comparison from tubers produced by true potato seed and clonally
(variety Atzimba).
Seed source
20 g tub. TPS
20 g tub. TPS
20 g tub. clonal
40 g tub. c lonal
Seed rate
t/ha
Yield
t/ha
2
1
2
13
17
12
17
79
Tuber
weight (9)
24
25
54
64
Tuber
/plant
14
12
6
7
80
POST-HARVEST TECHNOLOGY
...
The initial success in this technology transfer was with the diffused light storage technique for
maintaining seed tubers in optimum
physical and physiological condition. This technology is receiving
widespread farmer acceptance. Nonrefrigerated storage of ware potatoes
has become a major problem of
lower elevations. Adequate storage
methods exist in the cool highlands.
Processing, another part of CIP
research until recently, is still being
explored in the Regions.
was copied by the Research Institute and the Department of Agriculture and at least 13 more were
built. This has drastically changed
the prospect for seed storage in
Burundi and the concept, adapted
to smaller scale stores, has been
taken up by farmers.
Region IV. Tunisia. Preliminary
observations were made to test the
feasibility of providing seed tubers
for the following early February
planting of June-harvested tubers
stored throughout the hot summer
without cold storage. The plan was
to use traditional storage under
straw until the end of September,
then placing seed tubers in trays
in diffused light until planting.
Physical appearance of the tubers
was slightly dessicated with firm
green sprouts. Yield was only slightly below that of imported tubers.
However, as 24 varieties are on the
official recommended list, possible
variety differences must be investigated before final conclusions are
made.
82
.,.
..
Yield, t/ha
Site
Dahmani
Sidi Bouz
Sfax
Nahdia
Jendouba
Siliana
Zaghouan
Korba
Kelibia
Bizerte
90!o
germination
Harvest to
planting
30
45
60
75
90
105
42
42
35
28
21
14
72
87
95
103
111
119
>
Improved seed
2.5
8.0
15.3
18.5
45_0
0.0
12-0
10.0
6.0
6.7
5.3
8.0
12.2
20.5
42.5
11.1
15.0
11 .0
9.0
15.0
Farmers' seed
Region IV. Tunisia. Locallyproduced improved seed was compared with farmers' seed for the
autumn crop and imported seed for
the winter crop (Table RRT-6 and
RRT-7). A cold store with uniform
temperature could not be found
Takelba
Soliman
Beni Khaled
Bani Khiar
Mahdia
Sousse
Gabes
Improved seed
Imported seed
26-6
7.8
37.7
44.4
35.0
18.0
15.5
27.0
15.6
28.2
9.9
42.1
32.9
36.0
17.0
17.0
24.0
13.0
INSECT CONTROL
83
Region IV and V.
Survey of PTM in
farms and stores
Infection
Percent
Tunisia:
Experimental plots at
harvest ...... . ... .
Farmers' fields . ...
Farmer's store two
weeks after harvest ..
Cold store after one
culling .. ........ .
Cyprus:
4 to 6 weeks storage
dusted with Sevin . . .
Vegetable market of
potatoes Sevin dusted ... . ........ . . .
Syria:
Farmers' fields 10
days before harvest ..
Jordan:
Experimental field at
harvest .......... .
17-40
22-37
54
16
9-56
39
13-18
54
84
Interdisciplinary approaches to
problem identification, technology
generation, and transfer are now
used in CIP's key research areas and
regional programs. An economic
model has been developed for analysis of conventional seed certification
programs. Interdisciplinary research
helps establish priorities for refining
true potato seed technology. Adoption of post-harvest technology and
impact is being monitored. Studies
of potato consumption and marketing contribute to understanding
potential demand for use in developing countries.
CIP's social scientists work directly with biological research scientists
in problem identification, design,
and transfer of improved potato
technology.
They apply social
Farmer-Back-To-Farmer
The Farmer-Back-To-Farmer
model, formulated with CIP's postharvest Thrust, is based on the
principle that applied agricultural
research and transfer of acceptable
technology should begin and end
with the farmer, and involve interdisciplinary teamwork in all phases
of a continuous research/transfer
process. The model was developed
during adaptation of seed storage
principles to the requirements of
resource-poor farmers and is equally applicable to any area of applied
agricultural research.
85
86
4.
Common
definition
Applied disciplinary
research
about FARMERS
PROBLEM
Solution
better
adapted
to
farmers
problem
of
farmers
problem
2.
POTENTIAL SOLUTION
TO FARMERS PROBLEM
Goals
Activities
1
2
3
Farmer evaluation
87
Yc - Yf
Philippines
Peru
Guatemala
Honduras
Colombia
Sri Lanka
Pc - Pf
p
where:
yield resulting from
use of certified and
non-certified seed,
respectively,
S
seeding rate,
Pc and Pf
price of certified and
non-certified seed,
respectively,
P == price of potatoes
produced.
Ye and Yf
>
Number
130
42
15
43
6
20
256
88
Table SSD-2. Cost and revenue estimates for potato producers, rural assemblers,
truckle rs, and wholesalers in central Peru 1979 (US$/t).
Total
revenue
.!
1. Producers
Coast
Small farmers
Med/I arge farmers
Prodn. Coops.
Highlands
Small farmers
Medium farmers
Large farmers
58
67
80
42
41
49
78
81
103
129
97
84
-51
- 16
19
19
15
6
8
8
8
-2
0
18
22
22
15
-4
7
4. Lima Wholesalers
Net
revenue
100
108
129
3. Truckers
Coast
Gasoline
Diesel
Highlands
Gasoline
Diesel
Total
cost
Not a major marketing agent for h ighland potatoes shipped to Lima . Total revenue exc ludes
cost of potatoes.
3.00
Vf
= Percent of virus on
Vc
= Percent of virus on
non-certified seed.
2.50
certified seed.
2.00
1 . 50
1.00
10
20
30
vf (lol
89
40
50
90
The plastic packagi ng of these potatoes (center) in the Baguio, Philippines mun ici pal
m arket indicates t heir " high status" positio n among other vegetables. In th is area,
potatoes are a luxury food, eaten onl y on special occas ions. Most are trucked t o Man ila
markets.
91
In a market on the island of Mindanao, Ph ilippines potatoes are displayed more casually and in larger quantity than in the Baguio market on the island of Luzon. In this
market, customers select from a range of prices based on size and quality . Potatoes are
consumed regularly in this area as a supplementary vegetable.
92
~.
93
94
Planning Conference
95
TRAINING
97
98
Instructor (kneeling) and trainees in a germ plasm manage ment course in Lima.
99
a daily evaluation that provides immediate feedback to organizers and instructors, permitting
adjustments as the event evolves and
an analysis of effectiveness useful in
future planning. It was used in seven
courses, in English, Spanish, and
French.
a measurement of learning
involving pre- and post-tests used in
two courses.
a final summary evaluation
used in 11 courses.
an evaluation of training
materials with the intent of improvement.
Post Doctorals. Young Ph.D. 's
conduct specific research over a
predetermined period of time in
an international setting with the
possibility of beginning technical
assistance careers. CIP had nine
post doctoral positions.
COMMUNICATIONS
LIBRARY
101
1980
(lo)
1981
(lo)
OTHER
TOTAL
Ad.
Res.
Tr.
Subtotal
Ad.
Res.
Tr.
Subtotal
14
2.6
48
9 .0
46
9.0
108
20.6
154
29.0
114
21.4
155
29.2
384
79.6
531
100.0
14
1.6
65
7.4
45
5.2
124
14.2
180
20.6
291
33.3
278
32.0
749
85.8
873
100.0
SPECIAL PROJECTS
Total to date
1980
1981
980
73
383
76
505
74
384
70
4,160
74
384
532
4,084
991
428
4,830
532
482
3,009
235 (56)
102
271 (66)
na
na
271 (66)
103
105
106
1 . Cornell University.
"The
Utilization of Solanum tuberosum
spp. andigena Germ Plasm in Potato
Improvement and Adaptation."
R. L. Plaisted, H. D. Thurston,
W. M. Tingey, R. E. Anderson
B. B. Brodie, M. B. Harrison
E. E. Ewing.
2. North Carolina State University. "Breeding and Adaptation of
Cultivated Diploid Potato Species."
F. L. Haynes.
3. I. V. P. Agricultural University, Wageningen. "A Breeding Program to Utilize the Wild Solanum
Species of Mexico." J . G. Th.
Hermsen.
4. University of Wisconsin
Madison, U.S.A. "Potato Breeding
Methods with Species, Haploids and
2n Gametes." S. J. Peloquin.
5. Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria, Argentina.
"Programa de Utilizaci6n de Mayor
Variabilidad Genetica en el Plan de
Mejoramiento de Papa." A. Mendiburu.
6. Agriculture Canada. " Response of Tuberosum Genotypes to
Environmental Stress." D. A. Young.
7 . Instituto Nacional de Investiga~i6n
y Promoci6n Agropecuana, INIPA, Peru. "Evaluaci6n
de Clones Avanzados del CIP y
del Proyecto Nacional de Papa
Peruana." M. Quijandria.
and
Pathology Department
31. International
Agriculture
Centre, Wageningen. "Consultancy
on Potato Improvement in North
Africa." H.P. Beukema.
108
Staff
Research
Orville T . Page, Ph . D . . . . .. . . . . . ... . . . .. Director
Head of Department
Gen eticist
Gen etici st
Cytogeneticist
Breede r
Breeder
Breeder
Head of Department
Nematologist
Breeder-Nematolog ist
Pla nt Protecti o n Specialist
Entomol ogist
Entomo logist (Region IV)
Entomologist (study leave)
Vis itin g Entomologist
Pathology
Edward R. French, Ph . D. . .. . . . . ... . . . . .
Carlos Martin, Ph . D. . . . . . ... . . .. . . . . . ..
William Hooker, Ph. D. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Luis Salazar, Ph. D .. .. . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . ..
Anwar Ri zv i, Ph . D. . ... ... . . . . . . . . . . . .
Jan Henfling, Ph. D. . . . . . . . . ... ... . . . . .
Fritz Elango, Ph . D. . . . . . ... . .. . . . . . . . .
109
Head of Department
Path o logist
Virologist
Vi rolog ist
Virologist -Breeder
Mycologi st
Mycol ogist
Physiology
Sidki Sadik, Ph. D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Patricio Malagamba, Ph . D. . . . . . . . . .
Robert Booth, Ph. D. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liese lotte Schilde, Ph . D . . . . . .. ... .
David Midmore, Ph.D. . ... . . . . . . .
Siert Wiersema, M. S . . . . . . . . . .. ...
J effrey White, Ph . D .. .. . . . . . . .. ..
Roy Shaw, B. S . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .
Head of Department
Physiologist
Physiologist
Physiologist
Physiologist
Physiologist
Physiologist
Physiologist
Taxonomy
Head of Department
Carlos Ochoa, M. S ..
Support Department
O rville T . Page, Ph. D. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Marco Soto, Ph.D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cesar Paredes, Ing. Agr . . . . ... .. . ..
Dennis Cunliffe, Ing. Agr .... . . . . . . .
Enrique Grande . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .
Eduardo Belda, Ing. Agr. . . . . . . . . . .
J oseph K. Campbell, Ph . D. . . . . . . . .
Head of Department
Superintendent Hua ncayo
Fie ld & Greenhouse Supervisor / Hyo
F ield & Greenhouse Supervisor Lima
F ield Supe rvisor San Ramon
F ield Supervisor - Yurimaguas
Visiting Agr. Engineer
Regional Research
Headquarters
Kenneth J. Brown, Ph . D .. . . . . . . . . . D irecto r
Primo Accatino , Ph . D. . . . . . . . . . . . Coordinator, Research Transfer
J ames E. Bryan, M. S . . . . . . . . . . . .. Senior Seed Prod. Spec.
Region I -
Tropical Africa
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Regional Re presentative
Research Scientist - Rwanda, Burundi
Research Scientist - Rwa nda , Burundi
Assoc. Res. Scient ist
11 0
Region V -
Southwest Asia
South Asia
Southeast Asia
Head of Department
Agronomi st/ Economist
Agricultural Economist
Anthropologist
Anthropo logist
Agricultural Economist Special Project
Head of Department
Senior Training Officer
Training Materials Officer
Communications Specialist Special Project
Frank Shideler, M.A. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. .. Senior Editor
Herna n Rincon, Ph.D. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Spanish Ed itor
Carmen Podesta, M. A. Inf. Sc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Li brarian
Administration
Office of Executive Officer
Adrian Fajardo, M. S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lucas Reano, C. P. C. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
German Rossani, M. D. . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . ..
Ferna ndo Canal le, Ing. Civ ... .... . . . . . . . . . .
Georgi o De-Gasperi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Jacques Vandernotte . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ana Dummett, B. S. Asist. Soc. . . . . . .... ....
Executive Officer
Administrative Supervisor
Medical Officer
Works Superviso r
Transportation Supervisor
Pilot
Social Assistant
Accounting
,,
111
Controller
Assistant Controller
Head Accountant
Accountant
Accountant
Scientific Associat es
Carmen Felipe Mo ra les, Ph. D. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Enrique Fernandez-Northcote, Ph . D ... .. . . . . . . . . .
Cesar Fribourg, M. S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Teresa Ames de lcochea, Ph. D ........ .... .... ..
Sven Villagarcla, Ph. D. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Agronomist
Vi siting Scientist
Visiting Scientist
Mycologist
Agronomist
Scientific Assistants
L uis Calua, I ng. Ag r. .. .. . .... . ..... .. ... . .. .
Walter A moros, M. S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. ... .
Ricardo Wissar, M. S.... . . . . . . ... .. .. ....... .
Luis Manrique, Ing. Agr. . . . ... .... .. ... . . . .. .
Rosario Galvez, Biol. ..... .. . ...... .... . .... .
Renate Kaltenbach, B. B. A ... .. ... .. . .. .. . .. . .
Marcia Bocangel , B. S. . . . . . . .. ... ..... .. .. .. .
Marla Palacios, Biol. . . . . . . . . . ..... .... .... . .
Angela Matos, Ing. Agr. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Jesus Alcazar, M. S . . . .. .. . . . . .... .. . . . . . . . . .
L ilian G. de Lindo, Ing. Agr . ... . . . . ... . .... . .. .
Ursula Nydegger, Tech . Dip ... . . . . ... . .. . ..... .
Carlos Chuqui llanqui, B. S.... . .... . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ernesto Velit, Biol. .. .. .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .
Josefina de Nakashima, Biol. .. .. ..... ... ...... .
Wilman Ga l indez, Ing . Agr . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ...... .
Hans Pinedo, Ing. Agr .... . . . . .. . . . . ... ..... . .
Jorge Abad, M. S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . .
Charlotte Lizarraga, B. S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .
Hebert Torres, M. S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nelly de Fong, M. S. . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Norma Gonzales, 0. F. . .. . ...... . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nelson Espinoza, Biol. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ... .
Jo rge Roca, Biol. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rolando Lizarraga, Ing . Agr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Alberto Yupanq ui , M. S. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .... .
Rolando Estrada, Biol. . .... .. ...... ... ...... .
Rolando Cab ello, Ing. Ag. . . .. . . .... . . .. .. . . .
Do nald Berrios, Ing. Agr . .. . .. . ..... .... .. ... .
Mati lde Orril lo, Biol. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. ... . .
Alberto Sa las, B. S. . . . . . . . . . ... ...... . . .... .
Marla Isabel Benavides, B. S ... ... .... ..... .... .
Hugo Fa no . .... ....... . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Jorge Alarcon, B. S. . ........ . .... ... ...... .
Jorge Recharte, Lie. An trop ........ . ... . . . .... .
Nelson Melendez, T ech . Dip . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... .
Lauro Gomez . ..... . . . ..... . ..... . . ...... .
Martha Crosby, B. A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... ..... . .
Miguel Ouevedo, Ing. Agr. . ...... . .. .. ..... . . .
Marfa Boisset , B. A. . ....... . .... .. .. . . . . . . .
112
Supplementary information
Repo rt o f
Exhibit 1
Exh i b i t 2
Exhibit 3
Exhi bit 4
US$
S/.
113
oreno
at1iio y
ASOCIAOOS
CON
PRICE WATERHOUSE
Ap ril 7 , 1982
Co u n t ersign ed by
di~
;~:~~~;~-~~~-~-(partner)
Peruvi an Pub l i c Accountant
Registration No . 15 5
114
Va
other supplies
Other (Note 3)
research work
Donors
CURRENT ASSETS
ASSETS
78,764
4 , 705 , 702
6,680,423
9, 149, 743
374 , 905
544 , 470
79 , 241
1,599,816
54 , 024
202 , 781
840 , 495
~3 , 603
688,512
515 , 874
57 , 992
2, 447 , 628
200 , 640
14 7 ' 26 3
l , 202 , 076
182,128
43, 757
461 ,169
633, 1 74
38,871
135,610
590 , 317
81 , 369
At December 31,
l 981
1980
US$
~
U~S$,...-~-
Special projects
Core programs
Other
Total current liabilities
par ties
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Bank loan and overdrafts (Note 2)
Ot her loan (Note 5)
Accounts payable to vendors and third
9,149, 743
702 , 000
2, 806
294 , 681
999,487
7. 013' 090
6, 013,603
679,757
389 , 887
646 ,220
48 , 700
899 , 086
204 , 166
6,6"8"Q,IB
632 , 000
121,487
54 , 438
807 , 925
5 ,51 3,627
4, 705 , 702
362 , 373
135 , 291
139, 736
272,728
44 ,1 26
529,396
111, 795
100, 747
At December 31,
1981
1980
US$
_U_
S_$ _ __
'
116
3,804,203
4 , 702 ,011
8 , 506,214
712,387
545 ' 765
702 ,000
207, 841
10, 674 , 207
3 , 530,832
3 , 834,406
7 , 365,238
477,534
329,306
632 , 000
160 , 967
8 , 965 ,045
2 , 139,377
860 ,1 58
2 , 56 1, 562
2, 117 , 039
676 , 293
2, 569,27 0
384,846
813, 396
1,951,911
8 , 711, 250
417 , 705
9 , 128 , 955
329,825
843 , 650
868,641
7 , 404 , 718
423,096
7 ,827 ,814
545 , 765
9 , 674 , 720
329 ,306
8,157,120
999 ,48 7
807 , 925
117
b) Grant transactio ns are accounted for on an accru~l basis. Restricted operating gr a nts and unrestri cted grants are accounted for i n
the period stipul ated by the donor. Expenditures f or gr ants utilized by i n ternational programs are reco rded on t he basi s of advi ces
received .
ln acco r dance with t he instructions of the Consulta tive Gro up on
In t erna tional Agricultural ReLlearch, the unexpended f und balances
at year end , if authori zed by donor s, are treated as a so urce of
funds i n the next y ear in order to absorb corresponding expenses ,
otherwise the unexp ended balances are recorded a s l iabilities.
Special projec t gran ts are recor ded in the year they are pledged
and the r elated expenses are applied against the respective income
when incurred .
Working capital grants are recorded i n the year t h ey are received .
c) Short-term investments are valued at cos t and bear annual interes t
of approximately 13%.
d) The laboratory , spar es and other mat erial s are generally valued at
estima t ed ac tual value , which approximate cost .
..
118
1981
US$
1980
US$
182,128
78,764
688,512
374,905
29,009
50,904
so ' 199
73,109
65 ,113
2,942
62,501
4,359
11 2 908
202 2 781
147,263
4
FI XED ASSETS
Fixed assets at December 31 , comprise the fol l owing:
..
,,
119
1980
US$
1981
US$
1980
US$
1, 932,617
712 , 429
1,538,951
458 , 5 16
225,276
676 , 310
290 , 025
107 ,140
72 , 339
6 , 013 , 603
1, 730 , 586
670 , 081
776 , 560
44 1, 346
15 1, 978
633 , 288
162 , 935
71,415
67,5 13
4 , 705 ,702
OTHER LOAN
The 1980 l oan balance from Proye cto Regional Cooperative de la Papa
(PRECODEPA) totalling US$ 100 , 74 7 (including US$ 747 of interes t payab le ) bearing interest of 20.69% per annum, was paid in its entirety
in 198 1 .
'
381 , 553
8, 334
389,887
1980
US$
CONTINGENT LIABILITY
A constructor has filed a l awsuit against the CIP c l aiming a payment
of Sh 6,394,000 (approximately US$ 12 , 537) tha t includes S~ 5,000 , 000
(US$ 9,800) for damages. The CIP has deposited S/. 1,500, 340 (US$ 2 ,942)
in a local bank as guarantee (Note 3) . It is the opinion of management
and their legal advisor that no significant liability will a rise from
this contingency.
GRANTS PLEDGED
During 1981 the following donations wer e pl edged to the CIP for spe cial
projec t s in 1982, 198 3 and 1984:
120
,_
\.
./
{
121
1982
US$
1983
US$
1984
US$
85,000
56,000
19 , 380
100,000
10 ,000
270 , 380
21 , 740
100 , 000
12 , 000
133 , 740
20 , 000
12, 000
32 , 000
Apri 1 7, 1982
'
07~- ~/
Count e rsigned by
---~-~~~--(p"''"'''
Francisco J .
Peruvian Pub l i c Ac counta nt
Registration No . 155
J
)
122
Exhibit l
INTERNAT I ONAL POTATO CENTER - GI P
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE - DONORS
DECEMBER 31 , 198 1
US$
Rockefell e r Founda t i on
I nternat i onal Deve l opmen t
Research Cen t er
Bel gian Governmen t
Swiss Government
Canadian Interna t ional Devel opment
Agency
United Nations Development Program
Federal German Government
Commission of t he European Communities
123
954
6 , 565
275 , 01 3
38 , 030
4,4 78
109 , 466
39 ' 786
158 , 882
633 , 174
.....
N
.!:>.
_.,,..
....,
FIXED ASSETS
DECEMBER 31 , 1981
Exhibit 2
18,909
66,519
32,577
127,090
9,286
4,826
545,765
441,346
151,978
633,288
162,935
71,415
67!513
4,705,702
,.f.'
201,555
46,955
38,048
Additions
US$
1,730,586
670 , 081
77 6 , 560
Balance as
of 1.1.81
US$
306,920
25,886
14,302
1, 653
5 , 165
1,000
7,300
251 ,614
52,325
1 , 069 ,056
12 , 563
8,432
15,610
1,476
2,693
975 , 957
ReElacements
Additions
Retirements
US$
US$
...
458,516
225 , 276
676 , 310
290,025
107, 140
72,339
6,013,603
1 , 932 , 617
712 , 429
1,538 ,951
..i
Balance as
of 12.31.81
US$
Exhibit 3
INTERNATIONAL POTATO CENTER - CIP
SOURCE OF FUNDS
DECEMBER 31, 1981
US$
CORE OPERATING GRANTS:
Multi- purpose
Danish International Development Agency ,
Denmark
Swiss Development Cooperation, Switzerland
I nternational Technical Assis tance , The
Netherlands
..
Less:
Applied to capital
Ap plied to working funds
US$
367 , 813
383 , 000
300,000
1,050,813
251 , 984
70 , 000
728,829
810,959
542 , 007
623,325
503 , 272
219 ,864
100,000
25 , 000
50 , 000
87,495
2, 96 1, 922
113,452
3,075 , 374
2 , 200 , 000
517 , 000
200 , 000
860 , 000
163,737
653 , 239
100 , 000
4 , 693 , 976
8 , 035
Carried forward :
125
3, 804 , 203
4,702 , 011
8 , 506,214_
8 , 506 , 214
Exhibit 3
Page 2
US$
US $
8 , 50 6,214
Brought forward :
SPECIAL PROJECT GRANTS :
Swiss Deve lopment Cooperation , Switzerland
Fede r a l German Government
International Devel opment Res earch Cent er
I nternational Development Agency , Canada
United Nations Development Program
Belgian Government
W.K. Kellog Foundat ion
Aus tral ian Development Assistance Bureau
Balance from previous years :
W. K. Kellog Foundation
Swiss Developmen t Coopera tion, Switzerland
In ternational Development Agency , Canada
United Nations Developmen t Pr ogram
Federa l German Government
International Development Research Center
Ford Foundat ion
202,180
154,457
39 , 287
3 , 085)
158 , 600
53,340
35 , 000
18 ' 170
1, 665
1, 584
11, 834
34 ' 128
34,078)
34 , 403
4,902
l,
712, 387
CAPITAL GRANTS :
Tr ans f erred f r om multi-purpose funds
Belgian Governmen t
Inter national Development Associa tion
251 , 984
23 , 781
270 , 000
545,765
WORKING FUNDS:
Transferr ed f rom multi- purpose funds
Balance from previous years
70 , 000
632 , 000
70 2,000
207,841
10 , 674 , 207
126
-J
Foundation -
Sapp rad
W. K. Kell og
53 , 340
1,979.356
18 , 170
70, 000
309, 688
248, 556
~
195,000
I n ternational Devel opment Research Center Ag ro- Economi c research on po tato production
Potato dehydration
272,352
Unit ed Na t ions Development pr ogram Technology t ransfer on ~oo t and t ubes c rops
241 , 649
234 , 830
35, 000
25, 000
110 , 000
646 , 479
42 , 214
40,8 15
149 , 391
232,420
127 , 300
54,607
181, 907
1,266,969
33 , 335
235 , 998
216 , 0 10
2, 271
263 , 604
442,716
24 1, 649
1..82 , 556
4,1 81
14,330
112 ,040
11 2 ,040
129 ,067
47 , 938
177 , 005
417,706
32 , 331
25, 299
26 , 406
36,329
18 , 072
2 , 420
80 , 238
137,059
23,6 37
41, 370
17, 733
~
~
1, 684 , 675
32 , 033
75 , 017
248, 341
~
293 , 628
77 . 634
290 , 010
241 , 649
218 ,885
22 . 253
16 , 750
80,238
579 , 77 5
135 , 677
153 ,410
17 , 733
183, 168
129 , 067
US$
US$
Tota l
ac cumul ated
years
US$
provi ded
US$
~
Di sbursements
Pr ior
Th is
Funds
.,
Swiss Development Cooper a tion, Switzer land Potato improvement - Nepal (First Phase )
Potato improvement - Ne pal ( Second Phase)
Basic seed p::> t ato produc t ion training
Exhi bit 4
.....
53 , 340
294,681
U1. ...~-~1)
(--2...Ql2.)
215
117,366
(~)
15,9 45
12, 747
8 , 250
29 , 762
66 , 704
24 , 481
40 , 815
~
-22...QlQ.
1 , 767)
506
1 !261)
to dat e
~
Balance
"),!!
-'
00
1-...l
.....
"'iS
..
..~"'
z~
"'"'~
u"'
Belgium
IBRD- I DA
PRECODE?!\
--12.!.:.
10 '674. 2
---2E.:.2.
70.0
~
_11.L!
4.9
120.4
193 . 1
10. 7
8 .7
192 . 7
73 . 7
36. 7
18. 2
Working Funds
CIDA
UNDP
IDRC
w. K. Kellog Foundation
1>.DAB - SAPPRAD
Be lgian Government
Swiss -
Swi ss De v. Coop .
Federal German y
Special Projects
Fo rd Foundation
...,.
270 . 0
23. 8
252 . 0
=-=,..==
==-===-
- ----
---
....
=-=-=-=
5. 3
36. 5
11 1. 6
2. 4
23. 4
63.6
46.8
41. 7
32. 1
2' 56 1. 6
1'956. 3
99 . 0
709. 7
51 7. 0
396.4
142. 4
92.8
"!'
384. 8
--
- -
384. 8
15 1. 4
44.9
-
1 06.S
233 .4
POOGRAM COSTS
Reg . Res.
Library
Doc . & Inf.
& TraininSl
- ----2'999.5
2"925.0
568. 6
-22.8
-
6.6
16 .2
545.8
~
270.0
23.8
1 1 61 1. 4
395 . 8
74.8
10 1 . o
201. 9
829.9
1 ' 388. 1
Capital Gr ant s
1)
Total
~ ~
Fixed
4'747.4
_ _ 0_._o
2' 200. 0
517 . 0
(3) 860 .0
209.1
653. 3
100 . 0
200.0
Federal Gennany
Japan
Belgium
E. E. C.
French
IDB
USA I O
IFAO
Restricted Cor e
Unrestricted Core
Total
Funds
Availab le
.....
844. 9
,.,,. ~
........
...
1 ' 951 . 9
---
- --
1 ' 951.9
---22!..2
15 . 0
-97 . 7
128.6
329.8
1 ' 380 . 8( 2 )
Gene r al
o,eeratin2_
-- - --
..11.:.l
- --
3. 0
11. 7
4. 2
0 .8
4.9
6 .9
8 13 .4
41 1. 8
21. 3
67. 0
10 . 2
88.2
225.1
401.6
Admi nis t.
Gene ral
\ of Gral.
14
15
14
14
13
15
15
33. 7
33. 7
33. 7
33 . 7
45
to Direct
.-
"""'
....""
999 . 5
702. 0
294. 7
..21:1-
(1 . 2)
79 .0
58.4
8.3
( 17 . 7)
117 .4
16. 1
(5. 0 )
(13.9)
2.8
-"-
4 5.4
(42 . 6)
Balance
Unexpended
. ,.
lJ
lJ
"
Donors
Payable
to
'-
'
Actual
zw
0
H
<
H
0
""
,_J
z<
0
....
z~
_t,,
el
H
z
....
w
;I:
Interest on Deposits
Sale of Cr ops & Materials
Sale of Fixed Assets
Indirec t Costs charges on Special Projects
& Curren t Accounts
Adjust ment prior year
Rate of Exchange adjustment
Other
50
10
110
74 . 0
16.0
138 . 9
65
66 . 3
( 10 . 9)
(34 . 4)
6. 3
10
Sub-Total
245
256 . 2
ill_)
(48 . 4)
200
207.8
200
207.8
TOTAL
Appl ication of Earn ed Income
Ap pl ied to Core Operations
129
z
....
"1
""~
5....
ll,
g
!5""
"1
"'8z
0:
.....
.,
(Exp!~ssed
Site Development
Capi t a l
Operating Equipment
Research Equipment
Vehicles & Aircraft
Furnitur e , Fixtures & Off . Equip .
Installation & Utilities
Constructions & Buildings
Defici ts
Analysis o f Variances
Budget Sur pluses
- Additional ear ned income
- Grant shortfall
- Tr ansferred t o Capi tal
- Net surplus
Corrmunication Equipment
Other Equipment
STAT~'IENT
Of'
ACTUAL EXPENSES
I
-I .
t.,r.
4 ' 009 . 2
42 . 6
7. 8
(45 . 0)
(245 . 8)
4'249 . 6
- - -
4 009 . 2
4 ' 009 . 2
- -- -
1 ' 388 . 1
605 . 3
233 . 4
401 . 6
1 ' J80 . 8
Operating
Unrestricted
Budget
Actual
1)
in thousand o f U. S. dollar s)
4 747.4
4 ' 747 . 4
4 ' 747 .4
45 . 4
4 ' 702.0
1 ' 61 1.4
1 ' 956 . 3
151. 4
411.8
571. 1
Act ual
Operating
Restricted
Budget
Programs
Potato Resear c h
Regional Researc h & Training
Library , Doc. & Inf o . services
General Administration
General Oper ating Costs
Contingenci es
THE
Schedule 3 : COMPARATIVE
~\
545 . 8
,.
54 5 . 8
545 . 8
300 . 0
245 . 8
66 . 5
47 . 0
38 . 0
18 . 9
32 . 6
201 . 6
127 . 1
9.3
4. 8
40.5
34 . 5
21.6
35 . 0
15.0
145 .1
4.0
2. 3
2. 0
Capit al
Budget
Ac tual
"U
r
3
Pl
I
~
~