Modern world is full of sufferings and pain.

Present diseases, very often incurable,

make peoples life intolerable, steal the sense of life and give a strong inducement
to die. Even the contemporary rapid development of medicine does not give the
possibility to save peoples life or to relieve their pain.
In the light of this situation, the problem of euthanasia is of current importance. For
the last twenty years, euthanasia has been a subject of much controversy. Doctors,
scientists, politicians and representatives of different confessions discuss the
possibility of legitimating euthanasia. Various countries take opposite sides and
either allow euthanasia or prohibit it. Euthanasia, however, occurs secretly in all
societies including those in which it is held to be immoral and illegal. The core of the
challenge of euthanasia is ethical because human life is in stake (Vaknin, 2). The
opponents claim the breach of the Gods right to command the human life, the
devaluation of peoples life and state that the legalization of euthanasia is, in fact,
the legalization of a murder.
However, I would like to support euthanasia and,i argue in favor of it. Euthanasia is
a deliberate intervention undertaken with the express intention of ending a life so
as to relieve intractable suffering (House of Lords, 12). It is necessary to note that
there are several types of euthanasia. Passive euthanasia is already widespread in
hospitals and is nothing but the impossibility to cure a person and attempts to
alleviate the sufferings with the help of narcotics or the cessation of therapy
because of its futility. While passive euthanasia is legally used in hospitals, the
application of non-aggressive euthanasia is constantly debated. It stipulates the
withdrawal of life support and it can be done either voluntary, that is with the
patients consent, or non-voluntary, when the patient is unable to decide.
In the case when the euthanasia may be voluntary, I would like to highlight the
human right to be in charge of their life. Sick bedridden people are already bereft of
all rights; they feel a burden for their relatives. Humble and disabled, they want at
least to leave this world peacefully and to die with dignity. Even criminals have a
right for their last wish; frankly speaking, it is our duty to fulfill the last wish of sick
patients. Besides, if the persons will is rejected, he or she might try to commit the
suicide. So, thus we incite them to a great sin and crime.
Moreover, very often euthanasia is the only way to relieve patients pain. Is it
human indeed to stay inexorable to peoples requests to set them free from
unbearable sufferings? Personally, I believe no one can experience others pain,
therefore it is impossible to measure whether the person can bear it or not. Besides,
a man is created for life, and all of us have the instinct of self-preservation, only
people driven to despair by their disease, can ask for death and it is their right. It is
necessary to realize how horrible it is to live, being conscious of the forthcoming
death. Most people cannot overcome this pressure and lose the sense of life,
burdening their own life and the life of their relatives as well. Euthanasia and
physician-assisted suicide will shorten the period of pre-mortem suffering and
eliminate fear about how and when death will occur. The patient will have a
measure of control over the process of dying (Singer, 58).
In cases of inability of patients to express their will, euthanasia is also possible and
is justified. Then the decision should be taken by the relatives, who are responsible
for that. Often it is obvious that the patient is doomed to death and has no chances

to survive. Still, relatives have to provide all necessary medicines and to pay for
places in hospital. It exhausts relatives state of mind and has fatal consequences
for the family budget. Many families spend their last money on the treatment that is
vain.
Another possible reason for the justifying of euthanasia is the lack of space in
hospitals for those who can be cured and saved. It is bitter to acknowledge it, but
this problem exists in many countries. Those who want to live have no chance to
get the proper treatment and care while those who want to die cannot give their
place to them.
In fact, I suppose the greatest problem of this controversial point is the inability of
the government to implement a thoroughly made law that can foresee all the
possible problems of the legalization of euthanasia and avoid them.
To make a conclusion, I am sure that euthanasia has the right to exist in our society.
It should be considered not as a murder but as an absolute necessity in urgent
situations.