Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
QUESTIONS
1. a. The cost of land includes the original
purchase price; brokers commissions;
legal fees; title, recording, and escrow
fees;
surveying
costs;
local
government special assessment taxes;
cost of clearing or grading; and other
costs that permanently improve the
land or prepare it for use. Expenditures
for land improvements that have a
limited life, such as paving, fencing,
and landscaping, may be separately
summarized as land improvements
and depreciated over their estimated
useful lives.
b. The cost of buildings includes the
original purchase price, brokers
commissions, legal fees, title and
escrow fees, reconditioning costs,
alteration and improvement costs, and
any other costs that improve the
buildings and hence benefit future
periods.
c. The cost of equipment includes the
original purchase price, taxes and
duties on purchases, freight charges,
insurance while in transit, installation
charges and other costs in preparing
the asset for use, subsequent
improvements or additions, and any
other expenditures that will improve the
equipment and thus benefit more than
one period.
2. a. A copyright, when purchased, is
recorded at its purchase price. When
internally developed, all costs of legally
establishing the copyright are included
as costs of the copyright.
b. The cost of purchasing a franchise and
all other sums paid specifically for a
franchise including legal fees are
considered the franchise cost. Property
improvements required under the
franchise also are recorded as part of
the franchise cost.
c. The cost of a trademark includes all
expenditures required to establish the
trademark, such as filing and
registration fees, as well as legal
expenses for the defense of the
3.
4.
5.
6.
63
labor,
direct
materials,
factory
overhead, and any other expenditures
that can be identified with the
construction of the asset.
b. When a company constructs its own
assets, there are two positions that
may be taken in assigning general
overhead to the cost of the asset: (1)
Overhead may be assigned to special
construction just as it is assigned to
normal activities on the grounds that
both activities benefit from the
overhead; this would mean that
construction would be charged with the
increase in overhead arising from
construction activities as well as a pro
rata share of the companys fixed
overhead. (2) Only the increase in
overhead may be charged to
construction on the grounds that
management decides to construct its
own
assets
after
giving
due
consideration to the differential or
additional costs involved. An equitable
allocation of the fixed overhead
between regular operations and
construction affords no special favor to
construction activities; on the other
hand, a charge to construction for only
the increase in total overhead grants
no special concessions to regular
activities during the construction
period.
64
for
succeeding
years,
but
by
successively decreasing amounts until
the charge has been fully written off.
Net income will be overstated for the
first year by the difference between the
65
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
Expenditure
Cost of installing machinery.........................................
Cost of unsuccessful litigation to protect patent..........
Extensive repairs as a result of fire.............................
Cost of grading land.....................................................
Insurance on machinery in transit................................
Interest incurred during construction period.................
g.
h.
i.
j.
k.
Classification
Asset
Expense
Expense
Asset
Asset
Asset (if interest added to construction
cost)
Expense (if interest charged to
expense)
Asset
Asset
Asset
Asset
Expense
66
67
PRACTICE EXERCISES
PRACTICE 121
1.
2.
Land
Cost to purchase land
Cost to purchase land
Cost to prepare land for use
Total
$100,000
50,000
10,000
$160,000
$125,000
Buildings
3.
Equipment
4.
Land Improvements
Cost to construct parking lot and sidewalks $10,000
PRACTICE 122
Equipment
Building
Land
Total
$20,000
1,000
1,750
$22,750
BASKET PURCHASE
$120,000
300,000
100,000
$520,000
(120,000/520,000) 500,000
(300,000/520,000) 500,000
(100,000/520,000) 500,000
Allocated
Cost
$115,385
288,461
96,154
$500,000
(Note: Some rounding is necessary to ensure that the total allocated cost is $500,000.)
PRACTICE 123
DEFERRED PAYMENT
1.
Equipment
Discount on Notes Payable
Cash
Notes Payable
120,696
49,304
10,000
160,000
68
2.
Notes Payable
Cash
20,000
Interest Expense
Discount on Notes Payable
20,000
9,963
9,963
Equipment
Gain on Asset Exchange
Land
PRACTICE 125
93,000
58,000
35,000
Cost of materials
Labor cost
Allocated overhead cost ($6,000,000/$3,000,000) $500,000
Interest cost
Total
PRACTICE 126
January 1
May 1
November 1
Total
1.
2.
$ 300,000
500,000
1,000,000
80,000
$1,880,000
Amount
$100,000
200,000
300,000
$600,000
Applicable
Interest
Rate
10%
12
12
Months of
Avoidable
Interest
12/12
8/12
2/12
Capitalized
PRACTICE 127
Building
Interest Expense ($250,000 $32,000)
Cash
32,000
218,000
250,000
69
$10,000
16,000
6,000
$32,000
Interest
PRACTICE 128
From Year 1
Amount
$ 100,000
532,000
July 1
Total
500,000
$1,132,000
1.
2.
Applicable
Interest
Rate
10%
12
Months of
Avoidable
Interest
12/12
12/12
12
6/12
Capitalized
Interest
$ 10,000
63,840
30,000
$103,840
PRACTICE 129
ACQUISITION BY DONATION
Land
100,000
Revenue (or Gain)
100,000
800,000
800,000
Mining Site
Asset Retirement Obligation
72,489
72,489
70
Cash price
Fair value of net assets ($1,060,000 $400,000)
Goodwill
$1,000,000
660,000
$ 340,000
Cash
Accounts Receivable
Inventory
Patent
Property, Plant, and Equipment
Goodwill
Liabilities
Cash
10,000
100,000
300,000
50,000
600,000
340,000
400,000
1,000,000
$ 500,000
660,000
$(160,000)
The $160,000 in negative goodwill is allocated proportionately to the $50,000 patent and the $600,000 property,
plant, and equipment:
Patent: $50,000 {$160,000 [$50,000/($50,000 + $600,000)]} = $37,692
PPE: $600,000 {$160,000 [$600,000/($50,000 + $600,000)]} = $452,308
Cash
Accounts Receivable
Inventory
Patent
Property, Plant, and Equipment
Liabilities
Cash
10,000
100,000
300,000
37,692
452,308
400,000
500,000
Building...............................................
Operating Permit .............................
In-Process R&D...............................
Assembled Workforce....................
Estimated
Cost Assigned to
Fair Values
Individual Items
$200,000
100,000
150,000
100,000
$550,000
200,000/550,000 $500,000
100,000/550,000 $500,000
150,000/550,000 $500,000
100,000/550,000 $500,000
$181,818
90,909
136,364
90,909
$500,000
Building..............................................................................................................................................................
Operating Permit................................................................................................................................................
R&D Expense.....................................................................................................................................................
Assembled Workforce.........................................................................................................................................
Cash............................................................................................................................................................
500,000
71
181,818
90,909
136,364
90,909
Cash ..................................................................................................................................................................
Inventory.............................................................................................................................................................
R&D Expense.....................................................................................................................................................
Goodwill (includes fair value of assembled workforce).....................................................................................
Liabilities....................................................................................................................................................
300,000
Cash............................................................................................................................................................
800,000
100,000
50,000
500,000
450,000
72
EXERCISES
1220.
Land
Improvements
Building
Purchase................................................... $390,000
Land survey..............................................
5,200
Fees for search of title for land...............
600
Building permit.........................................
$
3,500
Temporary quarters for construction
crews.......................................................
10,750
Payment to tenants of old building for
vacating premises..................................
4,600
Razing old building...................................
47,000
Excavating basement...............................
10,000
Special assessment tax for street
project......................................................
2,000
Costs of construction...............................
2,900,000
Cost of paving parking lot adjoining
building....................................................
$40,000
Cost of shrubs, trees, and other
landscaping.............................................
33,000
Total......................................................$ 449,400 $73,000
$2,924,250
Dividends, $5,000, should be closed to Retained Earnings. Damages
awarded for injuries sustained in construction, $8,400, are charged to a
loss account.
1221.
Patents................................................................................. 16,200*
Cash...............................................................................
16,200
*$12,000 legal expenses + $1,700 drawings + $2,500 fees = $16,200
Research and Development Expense............................... 37,000*
Machinery............................................................................ 29,200
Cash (or other credits).................................................
66,200
73
17,500
17,500
1222.
Property
Land..........................
Buildings..................
Equipment................
Total........................
Appraised
Value
$ 250,000
600,000
200,000
$1,050,000
Cost
Cost Allocation
Assigned to
According to
Individual
Appraised Values
Assets
(250,000/1,050,000) $920,000 = $ 219,048
(600,000/1,050,000) $920,000 = 525,714
(200,000/1,050,000) $920,000 = 175,238
$ 920,000
200,000
400,000
250,000
300,000*
1,150,000
2005
July
2006
June 30
Equipment............................................................
Discount on Notes Payable................................
Notes Payable................................................
Cash................................................................
79,000
34,472
Notes Payable......................................................
Cash................................................................
12,934
Interest Expense.................................................
Discount on Notes Payable..........................
*10% ($103,472 $34,472) = $6,900
2007
June 30
Notes Payable......................................................
Cash................................................................
Interest Expense.................................................
Discount on Notes Payable..........................
*10% ($90,538 $27,572)(rounded) = $6,297
74
103,472
10,000
12,934
6,900*
6,900
12,934
12,934
6,297*
6,297
1225.
1226.
30,808
Trademarks.......................................................................
Land ($650,000 0.20).....................................................
Buildings ..........................................................................
Franchise..........................................................................
Common Stock...........................................................
Paid-ln Capital in Excess of Par................................
145,000
130,000
520,000
115,000*
30,808
10,000
900,000
Buildings ...........................................................................
Premium on Bonds Payable ($300,000 0.06)..........
Bonds Payable.............................................................
Common Stock............................................................
Paid-ln Capital in Excess of Par.................................
710,000
75
18,000
300,000
100,000
292,000*
1228.
Land ..............................................................................
Common Stock (50,000 $0.50)..............................
Paid-ln Capital in Excess of Par..............................
Cash...........................................................................
*Market value of stock: 50,000 shares $15..........
Cash paid:
Purchase price (partial)........... $80,000
Legal cost..................................
10,000
Property taxprevious year. . .
30,000
Building demolition... $21,000
Less: Salvage............
6,000
15,000
Total..........................................................................
1229.
885,000*
25,000
725,000
135,000
$750,000
135,000
$885,000
$
320,000
200,000
280,000
245,000
$ 1,045,000
25,000*
$ 1,070,000
76
1230. (1)
Capitalized
Amount
Interest
$600,000
72,000
400,000
12.0
8/12
32,000
200,000
8.7*
8/12
11,600
November 1, 2005..............
500,000
8.7*
2/12
7,250
Total capitalized interest for 2005............................................................. $ 122,850
*Weighted-average interest rate on general bond liabilities:
Expenditure Date
January 2, 2005..................
12/12.................................$
May 1, 2005........................
Bond Issue
10-year
50,000
5-year
Principal
$ 500,000
Rate
10.0%
1,000,000
$1,500,000
8.0
8.7
Interest
Cost
80,000
$ 130,000
Interest
Fraction
Capitalization of the Year
Expenditure Date
Amount
Rate
Outstanding
Accumulated in 2005......... $1,000,000
12.0%
12/12.................................$ 120,000
822,850
8.7
12/12
March 1, 2006.....................
700,000
8.7
10/12
September 1, 2006.............
400,000
8.7
4/12
December 31, 2006............
500,000
8.7
0/12
Total capitalized interest for 2006 .....................................................
Capitalized
Interest
71,588
50,750
11,600
0
$ 253,938
77
1232.
Initial Acquisition
Detoxification Facility..................................
Cash...................................................
Detoxification Facility..................................
Asset Retirement Obligation............
900,000
335,945
900,000
335,945
27,651
27,651
1234.
(a) Wall.................................................................................
Accumulated DepreciationBuildings (old wall)......
Depreciation Expense..................................................
Buildings (old wall)..................................................
Cash..........................................................................
63,000
12,500
37,500
30,000
5,000
10,000
50,000
63,000
15,000
30,000
78
1235. 1. (a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
2. (a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
E
C
E
E
E
E
I
I
E
C
E
C
C
C
I
I
79
1238.
1. Cash...............................................................................
5,000
Receivables................................................................... 78,000
Inventory........................................................................ 136,000
Land, Buildings, and Equipment.................................. 436,000
Goodwill......................................................................... 295,000*
Current Liabilities....................................................
80,000
Long-Term Debt.......................................................
120,000
Cash..........................................................................
750,000
*Balance of purchase price not allocated to identifiable assets.
2. Cash...............................................................................
5,000
Receivables................................................................... 78,000
Inventory........................................................................ 136,000
Land, Buildings, and Equipment.................................. 366,000*
Current Liabilities....................................................
80,000
Long-Term Debt.......................................................
120,000
Cash..........................................................................
385,000
*$70,000 reduction due to negative goodwill.
1239.
1. Accounts Receivable....................................................
Inventory........................................................................
Prepaid Insurance.........................................................
Buildings and Equipment (net)....................................
Goodwill.........................................................................
Accounts Payable....................................................
Cash..........................................................................
220,000
250,000
10,000
200,000
110,000
160,000
630,000
80
1240.
Estimated
Fair Values
Internet domain name... $ 150,000
Order backlog................ 100,000
In-process R&D............. 200,000
Operating permit...........
80,000
$530,000
$500,000
$500,000
$500,000
$500,000
141,509
94,340
188,679
75,472
300,000
200,000
50,000
50,000
800,000
$141,509
94,340
188,679
75,472
$500,000
500,000
300,000
200,000
900,000
81
200,000
50,000
0
15,000
200,000
35,000
1242.
Land
Buildings
Equipment
Total fixed assets
2005
$ 200,000
600,000
300,000
$ 1,100,000
2004
$150,000
500,000
200,000
$850,000
82
PROBLEMS
1243.
1.
Cost of machinery:
Raw materials................................................................
Labor..............................................................................
Installation.....................................................................
Factory overhead..........................................................
Materials spoiled in trial runs.......................................
Machinery balance........................................................
*Raw materials: $76,000 $3,000 discount = $73,000
Machine tools balance......................................................
2.
$ 73,000*
49,000
11,200
16,900
2,400
$ 152,500
$ 13,000
Correcting Entries
(a) Loss on Sale of Machinery.......................................................... 2,480*
Machinery (Job Order No. 1329).............................................
2,480
*Loss: $14,480 cost of dismantling old machine $12,000 proceeds = $2,480
(b) Purchase Discounts.....................................................................
Machinery (Job Order No. 1329).............................................
To report cash discounts as a reduction in
machine cost.
3,000
16,900
24,000
13,000
3,000
16,900
24,000
13,000
1244.
The solution to this problem is adapted from Qs & As: Technical Hotline, Journal of
Accountancy, February 1989, p. 31.
(a) and (b)
83
1244. (Concluded)
(c) and (d)
(g)
EExpense.
The $50 cost of rakes is immaterial in relation to the other golf course
expenditures. The costs of estimating the life of the rakes and
maintaining a rake account in the financial records would far exceed the
value of the theoretical improvement in the records. The best approach
is to expense the cost of the rakes.
1245.
1. Cost of land:
Purchase price......................................................................................... $ 120,000
Delinquent property taxes ....................................................................
35,000
Title search and insurance ....................................................................
6,500
City improvements .................................................................................
18,000
Cost of destroying buildings, net of salvage used in new building....
17,000
Total cost of land................................................................................... $ 196,500
Cost of land improvements:
Landscaping............................................................................................. $ 82,000
Sidewalks and parking lot.......................................................................
39,000
Total cost of land improvements......................................................... $ 121,000
2. Cost of building:
Building permit......................................................................................... $
8,000
Salvage material from old building........................................................
3,000
Contract cost............................................................................................ 1,650,000
Total cost of buildings.......................................................................... $1,661,000
Fire insurance premium on building is charged to expense.
84
1246.
2005:
Mar. 1 Land ($610,000 0.20)..................................................... 122,000
Buildings ($610,000 0.80)............................................. 488,000
Property Tax Expense*....................................................
18,250
Cash .............................................................................
253,250
Mortgage Payable........................................................
375,000
*Alternatively, this could be debited to Prepaid Property Taxes and
adjusted at June 30.
30 Buildings...........................................................................
29,600
Cash..............................................................................
29,600
(Note: Repairs are capitalized because they were necessary at acquisition.)
May 15 Cash..................................................................................
Buildings......................................................................
4,500
15 Buildings .........................................................................
Cash..............................................................................
67,600
4,500
67,600
9,600
9,600
June 1 Patent................................................................................
Machinery .........................................................................
Common Stock............................................................
Paid-ln Capital in Excess of Par.................................
15,000
25,000
July 1 Franchise..........................................................................
Machinery .........................................................................
Discount on Bonds Payable...........................................
Cash..............................................................................
Bonds Payable.............................................................
20,000
45,000
3,000
54,600
7,500
85
3,000
37,000
18,000
50,000
54,600
7,500
1247.
Organization Expenses..................................................
150,000*
Land, Buildings, and Equipment.............................
To record costs identified with the establishment
of company. These organization costs should be
expensed as incurred.
*Organization fees paid to state........
$ 20,000
Corporate organization costs..........
30,000
Stock promotion bonus....................
100,000
$150,000
Land.................................................................................
Land, Buildings, and Equipment.............................
*Land site and old building................
$315,000
Title clearance fees...........................
18,400
Cost of razing old building...............
20,000
$353,400
353,400
Miscellaneous Revenue.................................................
Land...........................................................................
To reduce the cost of the land by proceeds
from the sale of scrap.
12,000
150,000
353,400*
12,000
60,000
Patent..............................................................................
Land, Buildings, and Equipment.............................
To reclassify patent cost to separate account.
60,000
60,000
14,400
Buildings......................................................................... 1,750,000
Land, Buildings, and Equipment.............................
To reclassify building cost to separate account.
86
14,400
1,750,000
1248.
(a) Retained Earnings..........................................................
120,000
Patents.......................................................................
To correct error debiting research and development costs of patents to patents in prior period.
(b) Patents............................................................................
Retained Earnings....................................................
To correct error debiting legal fees in
connection with the issuance of patents to
expenses in prior period.
14,280
(c) Patents............................................................................
Deferred Costs..........................................................
To debit patents with the legal costs in
connection with the successful settlement of
an infringement suit.
15,000
21,260
87
120,000
14,280
15,000
20,000
1,260
1249.
1.
2005
Jan. 2
15
Apr.
May 1
July 1
Dec. 31
2.
Organization Expenses..................................................
23,300
Cash...........................................................................
23,300
To record organization cost of legal fees and
stock certificate costs.
(Note: As mentioned in the text, the AICPA has determined that organization
costs should be expensed as incurred.)
Advertising Expense......................................................
Cash...........................................................................
To record costs to hire clown and for
pamphlets and candy for promotional purposes.
1,500
Patents............................................................................
Cash...........................................................................
To record application and legal fees for patents.
49,250
1,500
49,250
Licenses..........................................................................
20,000*
Trademarks ($30,000 $20,000)....................................
10,000
Common Stock.........................................................
To record container license and trademark.
*600 $50 = $30,000 cost of both intangibles
Relative value, license to total cost: 2/3 $30,000 = $20,000
Buildings.........................................................................
Cash...........................................................................
To record cost of building to be used in future
R&D projects.
131,000
175,000
Intangible assets:
Patents ...................................................................
Licenses ...................................................................
Trademarks................................................................
88
30,000
131,000
175,000
$49,250
20,000
10,000
$79,250
1250.
Cost.....................................
Escrow fee..........................
Property taxes....................
Real estate commission....
Remodeling and repairs....
(1)
2005
July 1
Land
$90,000 (15%)
1,500
2,250
4,500
$98,250
Building
$510,000 (85%)
8,500
12,750
25,500
67,500
$ 624,250
Land Improvements.......................................................
Land.................................................................................
Building...........................................................................
Discount on Notes Payable...........................................
Cash ($747,500 $311,555)........................................
Notes Payable..............................................................
*Discount on notes payable:
PVn = R(PVAF n i )
PV = $25,000(Table IV
= $25,000(12.4622)
= $311,555
20 5%
Total
$600,000
10,000
15,000
30,000
67,500
$722,500
25,000
98,250
624,250
188,445*
435,945
500,000
2006
June 30
$500,000
311,555
$188,445
Notes Payable.................................................................
Cash..............................................................................
25,000
Interest Expense.............................................................
Discount on Notes Payable........................................
*Interest Expense: $311,555 0.05 = $15,578
Principal reduction: $25,000 $15,578 = $9,422
15,578*
Notes Payable.................................................................
Cash .............................................................................
25,000
25,000
15,578
Interest Expense.............................................................
15,107*
Discount on Notes Payable........................................
*$311,555 $9,422 = $302,133; $302,133 0.05 = $15,107
89
25,000
15,107
1251.
Betterword Company
Income Statement
For the Year Ended December 31, 2005
Sales................................................................................................
$515,000
Cost of goods sold:
Beginning inventory................................................................. $142,000
Software production costs......................................................
56,300
Amortization of capitalized software costs...........................
26,750
Goods available for sale.......................................................... $225,050
Ending inventory......................................................................
90,020
135,030*
Gross profit....................................................................................
$379,970
Expenses:
Salaries and wages of programmers..................................... $235,000
Expenses related to research period....................................
78,400
Total expenses..........................................................................
313,400
Income before income taxes.........................................................
$ 66,570
Income taxes (35%)........................................................................
23,300
Net income...................................................................................
$ 43,270
*0.60 $225,050 = $135,030
Salvino Company
Analysis of Land Account
For 2005
90
$ 150,000
$1,600,000
90,000
5,000
1,695,000
$ 700,000
30,000
730,000
$2,575,000
1252. (Concluded)
Salvino Company
Analysis of Buildings Account
For 2005
Balance at January 1, 2005....................................................
Cost of new building constructed on land site 654:
Construction costs............................................................
Excavation fees.................................................................
Architectural design fees.................................................
Building permit fee............................................................
Balance at December 31, 2005..............................................
$ 910,000
$600,000
35,000
19,000
15,000
669,000
$1,579,000
Salvino Company
Analysis of Leasehold Improvements Account
For 2005
Balance at January 1, 2005............................................................................
Electrical work................................................................................................
Construction of extension to current work area ($80,000 1/2)................
Office space....................................................................................................
Balance at December 31, 2005......................................................................
$500,000
60,000
40,000
70,000
$670,000
Salvino Company
Analysis of Machinery and Equipment Account
For 2005
Balance at January 1, 2005...........................................................
Cost of new machines acquired:
Invoice price.............................................................................
Freight costs.............................................................................
Unloading charges...................................................................
Balance at December 31, 2005.....................................................
2.
$600,000
$90,000
2,000
2,500
94,500
$694,500
Items that were not used to determine the answer to (1) and where, or if, these
items should be included in Salvinos financial statements are as follows:
a. Imputed interest of $60,000 on funds used during construction should not be
included anywhere in Salvinos financial statements. Only actual interest
incurred can be capitalized.
b. Land site 655, which was acquired for $600,000, should be included in
Salvinos balance sheet as land held for resale.
c. Painting of ceilings for $10,000 should be included as a normal operating
expense in Salvinos income statement.
d. Royalty payments of $13,000 should be included as a normal operating
expense in Salvinos income statement.
91
1253.
Arnold Company
Analysis of Changes in Noncurrent Operating Assets
For the Year Ended December 31, 2005
Balance
Balance
Dec. 31, 2004
Increase
Decrease Dec. 31, 2005
Land.......................................... $ 175,000
$ 312,500*
$ 487,500
Land improvements................
192,000
192,000
Buildings.................................. 1,500,000
937,500*
2,437,500
Machinery and equipment...... 1,125,000
385,000
$17,000
1,493,000
Automobiles.............................
172,000
22,500
194,500
Leasehold improvements.......
216,000
216,000
$ 3,188,000
$ 1,849,500
$17,000
$ 5,020,500
COMPUTATIONS:
*Plant facility acquired from Jesco Jan. 6, 2005allocation to land and
building fair value25,000 shares of Arnold common stock at $50
per share market price.........................................................................
$1,250,000
$ 312,500
937,500
$1,250,000
92
1254.
1. 2005 interest accrued:
12%, 5-year note ($2,000,000 0.12)...................................................
10%, 10-year bonds ($8,000,000 0.10)..............................................
13%, 3-year loan ($2,000,000 0.13)...................................................
Total interest accrued2005*........................................................
*Maximum that can be capitalized.
2.
$ 240,000
800,000
260,000
$ 1,300,000
12%
=
$ 240,000
8,000,000
10
=
800,000
$10,000,000
$1,040,000
Weighted-average interest rate
($1,040,000 $10,000,000) = 10.4%
3.
Capitalized
Interest
Expenditures
Ship 341:
Accum. expend................... $1,150,000
April 1, 2005......................... 1,200,000
10.4%
10.4
6/12
3/12
$ 59,800
31,200
Ship 342:
Accum. expend...................
May 1, 2005..........................
1,200,000
1,600,000
10.4
10.4
9/12
5/12
93,600
69,333
750,000
1,250,000
950,000
13.0
13.0
10.4
12/12
6/12
6/12
97,500
81,250
49,400
810,000
10.4
4/12
28,080
Ship 343:
Accum. expend...................
July 1, 2005..........................
Ship 344:
Sept. 1, 2005........................
Ship 345:
Nov. 1, 2005.........................
360,000
10.4
2/12
6,240
Total capitalized interest for 2005............................................................ $516,403
93
1255.
1. Self-Constructed Equipment Cost
Stated at Full Cost
Services of consulting engineer....................................................................
Work subcontracted.......................................................................................
Materials..........................................................................................................
Production labor.............................................................................................
Maintenance labor used on self-construction.............................................
Payroll taxes and employee fringe benefits for indirect labor (30%).........
Manufacturing overhead................................................................................
Allocated executive salaries..........................................................................
Postage, telephone, supplies, and miscellaneous expenses.....................
Total............................................................................................................
$ 10,000
20,000
200,000
65,000
100,000
30,000
52,000*
22,500
10,500
$ 510,000
94
$ 10,000
20,000
200,000
65,000
10,500
1255. (Concluded)
3.
1256.
Approach 1: FV = $5,000; I = 8%; N = 30 years
$497
Approach 2: FV = $100,000; I = 8%; N = 30 years
$9,938
Approach 3: FV = $1,500,000; I = 8%; N = 30 years $149,066
Present
Value
Approach 1
$
497
Approach 2
9,938
Approach 3
149,066
Total estimated fair value
Probability
0.10
0.20
0.70
500,000
106,384
95
Probability-Weighted
Present Value
$
50
1,988
104,346
$106,384
500,000
106,384
1257.
1.
340,000
260,000
1,085,000
25,000
160,000
1,500,000
2. The possible reasons Aurora was willing to pay an extra $1,085,000 for Payette
include
Payette has a strong organization with trained staff already in place.
Payette has an efficient production and distribution network that is up and
running.
Payette has good relationships with its banks and suppliers.
Payette sells a superior product that has a well-established market niche.
3.
4.
340,000
195,000
340,000
0
25,000
160,000
350,000
5,000
25,000
160,000
150,000
1258.
1.
2005:
Interest Expense.................................................................
Construction in Progress...................................................
Accrued Interest Payable...................................................
Cash...............................................................................
2004:
Interest Expense.................................................................
Construction in Progress...................................................
Accrued Interest Payable.............................................
Cash...............................................................................
96
350,000
500,000
17,000
867,000
300,000
200,000
24,000
476,000
1258. (Concluded)
2.
$ (17,000)
(500,000)
Supplemental Disclosure:
Cash paid during the year for interest (amount of interest paid
net of the amount capitalized)............................................................
367,000
$ 24,000
(200,000)
Supplemental Disclosure:
Cash paid during the year for interest (amount of interest paid
net of the amount capitalized)............................................................
276,000
1259.
1.
2.
97
1259.
(Concluded)
The auditors should catch this kind of accounting abuse. However, even a good
audit may fail to detect such abuses when employees collude in order to bias the
accounting numbers in some way. For an example, see the article by Andy Zipser,
How Pressure to Raise Sales Led Miniscribe to Falsify Numbers, The Wall
Street Journal, September 11, 1989, p. A1.
1260.
(a) Buildings...................................................................................
329,000
Cash......................................................................................
329,000
To record cost of addition to building.
(Expenditures for additions are capitalized and are depreciated over the life of
the asset.)
(b) Loss on Removal of Wall (or Operating Expense)................
13,880
Cash......................................................................................
13,880
To record cost of removal of plant
wall$12,360 + $1,520.
(Cost to tear down old wall not considered part of new wall cost. No benefit to
future periods from old wall.)
(c) Accumulated DepreciationBuildings..................................
11,100
Cash...........................................................................................
5,930
Depreciation Expense..............................................................
9,370
Buildings ..............................................................................
26,400
To cancel book value identified with plant wall
and to record amount received from salvage.
(The removed wall will not benefit future operations and therefore should be
eliminated from the books.)
98
1260. (Concluded)
(d) Accumulated DepreciationBuildings......................................
Depreciation Expense..................................................................
Buildings ..................................................................................
To remove cost of old floor covering.
5,045
6,955
5,290
8,290
840
1,160
Shelving .......................................................................................
Cash...........................................................................................
To record cost of new shelving.
3,620
10,218
Accumulated DepreciationBuildings......................................
Depreciation Expense..................................................................
Buildings ..................................................................................
To record the removal of old wiring.
2,055
2,595
(h) Buildings.......................................................................................
Discount on Notes Payable.........................................................
Notes Payable...........................................................................
To record cost of new fixtures.
(Electrical fixtures have the same remaining useful life as the
building.)
8,580
720
Accumulated DepreciationBuildings......................................
Depreciation Expense..................................................................
Buildings ..................................................................................
To record the removal of old fixtures.
1,200
1,590
99
12,000
5,290
8,290
2,000
3,620
10,218
4,650
9,300
2,790
1261.
Customer List
Outcome 1: PMT = $50,000; I = 7%; N = 5 years $205,010
Outcome 2: PMT = 30,000; I = 7%; N = 4 years 101,616
Outcome 3: PMT = 10,000; I = 7%; N = 3 years 26,243
Present
Value
Outcome 1
$205,010
Outcome 2
101,616
Outcome 3
26,243
Total estimated fair value
Probability
0.20
0.30
0.50
Probability-Weighted
Present Value
$41,002
30,485
13,122
$84,609
Probability
0.10
0.10
0.80
Probability-Weighted
Present Value
$351,179
3,387
210
$354,776
84,609/439,385 $400,000
354,776/439,385 $400,000
Customer List........................................................................................
R&D Expense........................................................................................
Cash..................................................................................................
100
Cost Assigned to
Individual Items
$ 77,025
322,975
$400,000
77,025
322,975
400,000
1262.
1.
Land
Buildings
Equipment
Total fixed assets
2005
$ 300,000
800,000
400,000
$1,500,000
2004
$ 200,000
600,000
300,000
$1,100,000
(Note: The LIFO reserves are fair value adjustments that relate to current assets
instead of long-term assets. Also, it is reasonable to assume that the fair value of
cash and accounts receivable are close to their book values.)
Fair value of fixed assets: Fair value of total assets Cash Accounts
receivable Inventory LIFO reserve
2005:
2004:
It is difficult to tell whether Waystation is more or less efficient at using its fixed
assets than is Handy Corner. Based on the reported financial numbers,
Waystations fixed asset turnover is 3.08, whereas the ratio for Handy Corner is
only 2.8. However, as shown in (2), this difference may result from a difference
between book value and fair value of reported long-term assets. If Handy Corner
has relatively new fixed assets, for which the book value is quite close to the fair
value, then Waystations 2.17 fixed asset turnover ratio (based on fair values) is
worse than the 2.8 ratio value for Handy Corner.
101
DISCUSSION CASES
Discussion Case 1263
Each of the five items introduced in the case is discussed.
(a) Recorded book values on the books of the seller are irrelevant to the buyer. Market values of all
identifiable assets, both tangible and intangible, should be used to make the entry to record the
purchase. Appraisal values are one source of current values. Other possible sources include recent
sales of similar assets and engineers estimates of building costs. In this instance, the appraisal for
fire insurance purposes is recent enough that it probably could be used for purposes of recording
the purchase. The land value would be $35,000, or 1/5 of the building value. One could object to the
values in the appraisal for fire insurance coverage because of its potential bias toward higher values
to sell more insurance coverage. Evaluation of the reputation of the fire insurance company and its
appraisers would be required to determine the extent of such bias.
(b) Replacement costs of equipment can be used as a basis for determining the present worth of such
assets. Because it is easier to obtain replacement costs on new equipment than it is to determine
the market value for used equipment that exactly matches the age and condition of the assets
owned, it is common practice to use the new market price and then depreciate it to the estimated
age of the used equipment. In this instance, the new cost is estimated to be $450,000, and the
depreciated value of 50% of the cost new, $225,000, would be a reasonable estimate of the market
price of the old equipment.
(c) Franchises can be very valuable assets. As with tangible assets, the value recorded on the sellers
books is irrelevant to the buyer. Because the franchise is for an unlimited time, its value to the buyer
is unaffected by the time the seller used it. The current purchase price of similar franchises,
$120,000, can be used to record the purchase.
(d) The two research scientists who will transfer employment to Fugate represent a value to Fugate.
However, this human resource value is generally not recognized as an asset in our historical cost
system. Fugate would not own the scientists, and they could leave the company with no contract
penalties. Only in a few types of activities, such as professional sports, are contracts for human
resources capitalized and carried on the books as assets. In a business acquisition, the intangible
value of at-will employees is not recognized but is included as part of goodwill. In this case, the
researchers salaries will be charged to expense as they are paid. The accounting for human
resources is one accounting area that is certain to develop in the future.
(e) Patents are valuable assets that can be owned and transferred. The current value of the patent is
the appropriate measure of the asset value at the transaction date and the zero book balance on
Gleaves books is not relevant to Fugate.
The total current value of the assets acquired would be as follows:
Land.............................................................
$ 35,000
Building........................................................
175,000
Equipment...................................................
225,000
Franchise.....................................................
120,000
Patents.........................................................
150,000
Total..........................................................
$705,000
Because only $556,950 was paid for these assets, negative goodwill exists. The cost must be prorated to
the assets in the ratio of the total cost to the total market value, or $556,950 $705,000 = 79%. Thus,
the cost values would be 79% of each of the preceding market values. The journal entry would be as
follows:
Land.............................................................
Building........................................................
Equipment...................................................
Franchise.....................................................
Patents.........................................................
Cash......................................................
102
27,650
138,250
177,750
94,800
118,500
556,950
Note that none of the assets acquired is a current asset. Current assets would be recorded at their fair
values, even with the existence of negative goodwill.
Discussion Case 1264
Generally accepted accounting principles do not specify exactly what costs should be included in selfconstructed assets. Direct charges are clearly capital items, as are incremental overhead charges. FASB
Statement No. 34 requires interest to be capitalized during the construction period. Practice varies as to
normal overhead items, with the theoretical arguments favoring a charge for all overhead. This case
provides an excellent vehicle for considering both general and specific problems related to accounting
for self-constructed assets. The specific issues of the case are discussed here.
(a) Overtime premium payments should be spread to all work of the maintenance department, not just
to the construction of the machinery. Overtime hours are necessary because of the total workload in
a department, and the choice of which work is done in the overtime is purely arbitrary. To avoid
manipulating charges to specific jobs, overtime premium payments should be considered part of
general overhead.
(b) Any intracompany profit should be eliminated in the cost assigned to the machinery. Many
companies organize their operations so that different operational centers can earn a profit. Care
must be exercised to be sure remaining asset values exclude these profits.
(c) Although it is fairly well accepted that incremental overhead should be recognized as part of the
self-constructed machinery cost, there is no definite position on how the normal overhead should be
charged. A common practice is to allocate normal overhead to self-construction projects using the
same basis as is used for regular operations.
(d) The cost of machinery should include charges for testing and pilot production runs. Because the
work will be done by the production department, a charge for material, labor, and overhead should
be made by the production department to the machinery account.
(e) Because the construction time period is 1 year, the interest on money being used to construct the
machinery is a cost that should be recognized. Although the FASB has not recommended including
imputed interest on equity capital as an interest cost, including interest on outstanding debt is
required.
(f) Although the company saves money by constructing its assets, no revenue should be recognized for
this savings under the historical cost basis of accounting. It could be noted, however, that if current
cost valuation were to be adopted, the machinery might be valued at a higher market value that
would reflect the savings due to self-construction.
Discussion Case 1265
This case addresses the problems associated with accounting for software development costs. Strategy
wants its financial statements to present a favorable picture of the companys financial condition and
operating performance. If the owner is correct in predicting that this years research and development
costs will be recovered through sales in the following year, a strong argument could be made to defer the
costs incurred this year and match them against next years revenues. The central issue, however, is
whether the sales will actually materialize next year. The uncertainty of predicting future sales led the
FASB to conclude that until technological feasibility has been established, costs to develop software
should
be
expensed. It is unclear from this case how much of the $45,000 was related to products for which
technological feasibility had been established and how much related to new products still in the
preliminary
design and testing stages. To the extent that the costs were incurred for new products for which
technological feasibility had not been established, the CPA is correct in insisting that these costs be
expensed as required by the FASB.
103
2.
It can be argued that the asbestos removal costs are no different from any other costs incurred in
getting a building ready for use. Also, it is reasonable to think that the purchase price of the building
incorporated an adjustment for the estimated removal costs and thus was lower than it otherwise
would have been. Capitalizing the costs would cause the building to be shown at what it would really
cost to acquire it and put it into service. Those who think the removal costs should be expensed
argue that they are more like repairs, which simply return the building to its normal state.
The EITF concluded that the asbestos removal costs for buildings acquired with a known problem
should be capitalized if they are incurred within a reasonable time after the acquisition.
Because the building cannot be properly used without removing the asbestos, it can be argued that
the removal costs enhance the building. Also, the asbestos removal can be thought of as extending
the useful life of the building. If this is true, the costs should be capitalized. However, it can also be
argued that the removal costs do nothing to enhance the building or extend its useful life but are
more on the order of maintenance or repairs, which are typically expensed.
104
3.
The ElTFs decision was that the asbestos removal costs for an already owned building may be
capitalized; the removal costs are essentially treated as a betterment. For both situations (1) and
(2), the EITF emphasized that any capitalization should be subject to a test for impaired asset value
to ensure that capitalizing the removal costs would not result in reporting the building at more than
its current market value.
Answers will vary.
This solution is adapted from Recent EITF Actions, Journal of Accountancy, February 1990, p. 93.
Discussion Case 1269
The students reports should include the following points:
Company A will capitalize the interest on the construction loan and report total building cost of
$21,400,000 [($20,000,000 0.14 6/12) + $20,000,000]. Company B has no interest payments to
capitalize, so reported total building cost is $20,000,000.
The contractor would also need financing during the construction period and would certainly add that cost
to the price of the building. Assuming that Companies A and B were as efficient at construction as the
contractor, a reasonable price would be $21,400,000. Some might argue that the contractor, being a
specialist and thus more efficient, would be able to charge a lower price. The important point is that the
contractors price would include a charge for the interest during the period of construction.
Just as borrowing has a cost, called interest, using invested funds also has a cost. Shareholders invest in
a company and allow the board of directors to retain profits in the company because the shareholders
expect a return on their investment in the form of dividends or of an increase in the value of their shares
(capital gain). Conceptually, this return expected by shareholders is exactly analogous to the interest
expected by debt holders. The difference lies in the fact that this equity interest is implicit, whereas the
debt interest is explicit. Some have argued that the implicit interest cost associated with the use of equity
should be capitalized in the same way that debt interest is now capitalized in accordance with SFAS No.
34. See Robert Anthony, The Accounting Concepts We Need, Accounting Horizons, December 1988, p.
128.
Discussion Case 1270
The rule requiring firms to expense R&D outlays results in a decrease in net income for most firms. A
decrease in reported net income can impact a firm in several ways:
Some investors seem to rely on the naive use of reported earnings in picking stocks.
Accordingly, managers compensation may suffer when R&D expenditures are expensed, and those
managers may be less willing to authorize R&D projects. This is in spite of the fact that the R&D might be
beneficial for the firms long-run profitability.
It might be expected that in response to an accounting standard change, management bonus plans, loan
covenants, and investors decision rules would be adapted to allow for the change in reported earnings
brought about solely because of the accounting change. However, there is evidence that such
adjustments are not always made.
105
Appreciation in asset values is a large part of the business of a real estate firm. Because of this and
because generally accepted accounting rules require long-term assets to be depreciated, many
users of financial statements think that historical cost financial statements for real estate companies
can be particularly uninformative. For a further discussion, see Edward P. Swanson and Frederick
Niswander, Voluntary Current Value Disclosures in the Real Estate Industry, Accounting Horizons,
December 1992, p. 49.
2.
Daimler-Benz was willing to reveal the magnitude of its hidden reserves in order to comply with U.S.
GAAP as a prerequisite to listing its shares on the New York Stock Exchange.
Hidden reserves are a result of the prudence principle: the primary goal of current management is
to make sure that the firm survives into the future to the benefit of stockholders, creditors,
employees, local economies, and so on. One way to build up a financial cushion to increase the
probability of survival is to pay out small cash dividends. In many jurisdictions, the amount of cash
dividends is tied to the amount of reported income. Accordingly, the prudence principle dictates the
recording of accelerated depreciation in order to lower reported income and reduce the payment of
cash dividends.
3.
SEC dissatisfaction with asset revaluations in the 1920s and 1930s was mainly a result of unease
about the methods used to compute the revaluations, not about the notion of revaluation per se.
When there is an established market for an asset, revaluation to market value is almost as objective
and verifiable as using historical cost. An auditor is understandably wary about appraisals and
estimates; however, market values from an active market are not as subjective.
106
107
108
Stop & Research (p. 742): Another way to handle negative goodwill is to leave the recorded asset
values unchanged and report the entire amount as an extraordinary gain. In SFAS No. 141, the FASB
discussed and specifically rejected this approach. What reason did the FASB give? (Hint: Look in
Appendix B of SFAS No. 141.)
In Statement No. 141, paragraph B188, the FASB stated that the existence of negative goodwill is, in
most cases, the result of measurement error in the estimation of the fair values of the acquired assets.
Conceptually, if all of the fair values have been appropriately estimated, it would be a rare case in which
an acquirer would pay less than the aggregate fair value of the assets acquired. After setting aside the
current assets and the financial assets, for which the probability of significant measurement error is low,
the estimated fair values of the remaining noncurrent assets (and acquired R&D) are reduced
proportionately. Essentially, this procedure assumes that the unobservable measurement error is spread
proportionately throughout the remaining noncurrent assets.
109
2.
The Cowboys won their first Super Bowl on January 16, 1972, beating the Miami Dolphins by a
score of 243.
110
111
94
512
113
719
3. Note 1 explains Disneys amortization policy for intangible assets. The following explanation is
included under the subheading Accounting Changes:
SFAS 142 addresses the financial accounting and reporting for acquired goodwill and other
intangible assets. Under the new rules, the Company is no longer required to amortize goodwill and
other intangible assets with indefinite lives, but will be subject to periodic testing for impairment.
SFAS 142 supersedes APB Opinion No. 17, Intangible Assets. Effective October 1, 2001, the
Company will adopt SFAS 142 and is evaluating the effect that such adoption may have on its
consolidated results of operations and financial position. However, the Company expects that a
substantial amount of its intangible assets will no longer be amortized.
The company policy before the issuance of SFAS 142 (described under the subheading Intangible &
Other Assets was as follows:
Intangible assets are amortized over periods ranging from two to forty years. The Company
continually reviews the recoverability of the carrying value of these assets using the methodology
prescribed in SFAS 121. The Company also reviews long-lived assets and the related intangible
assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amounts
of such assets may not be recoverable. Upon such an occurrence, recoverability of these assets is
determined by comparing the forecasted undiscounted net cash flows of the operation to which the
assets relate, to the carrying amount, including associated intangible assets, of such operation. If the
operation is determined to be unable to recover the carrying amount of its assets, then intangible
assets are written down first, followed by the other long-lived assets of the operation, to fair value.
Fair value is determined based on discounted cash flows, appraised values or management's
estimates, depending upon the nature of the assets.
4. The business segment information in Note 11 states that capital expenditures for each of Disneys
operating segments were as follows in 2001 (in millions):
Media Networks........................................................
Parks and Resorts....................................................
Studio Entertainment................................................
Consumer Products..................................................
Corporate..................................................................
Total....................................................................
112
$ 207
1,278
36
70
204
$1,795
A T-account will be used to estimate the book value of the PP&E that was sold during the year.
Property, Plant, and Equipment (net)
12/31/00
5,823
01 Purchases
980
01 Book value of
disposals
????
Depreciation expense 1,089
12/31/01
5,615
From the T-account data, the book value of the disposed assets in 2001 is $99.
2.
A T-account will be used to estimate the book value of assets disposed of during the year:
12/31/00
01 Purchases
12/31/01
????
From the T-account data, the indicated historical cost of 2001 disposals is $785.
Accumulated Depreciation
01 Disposals
12/31/00
01 Depreciation
12/31/01
????
8,347
1,089
8,750
From the T-account data, the indicated accumulated depreciation on items disposed of in 2001 is
$686.
Estimated gain or loss on disposal:
Proceeds...................................................................
Book value ($785 $686)........................................
Estimated gain on disposal.......................................
$102
99
$ 3
113
Reported
$ 219
345
5,659
13,362
10,468
2,894
2,065
(1,047)
(808)
12
Adjust.
+12
12
12
12
0
12
12
+12
0
12
Expense
Interest
$ 231
333
5,647
13,350
10,468
2,882
2,053
(1,035)
(808)
0
2.
Interest expense.................................................
Earnings (before taxes)......................................
Net PP&E...........................................................
Total assets........................................................
Total liabilities.....................................................
Total equity.........................................................
Net cash provided by operating activities..........
Net cash used in investing activities..................
Net cash used in financing activities..................
Interest capitalized during the year....................
Expense
Interest
$ 231
333
5,647
13,350
10,468
2,882
2,053
(1,035)
(808)
0
Add Back
Depr.
0
+3
+3
+3
0
+3
0
0
0
0
Total
231
336
5,650
13,353
10,468
2,885
2,053
(1,035)
(808)
0
The correct answer is b. Capitalized interest will be based on the amount of avoidable interest
caused by the building construction. When that amount exceeds the specific funds borrowed,
interest on unrelated liabilities will be capitalized. When that amount is lower than the funds
borrowed, as is the case here, the amount to be capitalized will be the lower amount of $40,000.
2.
The correct answer is b. The only time costs are capitalized as goodwill is when a business
combination occurs and the cost of the acquisition exceeds the fair market value of the underlying
net identifiable assets acquired. Neither the cost of developing nor maintaining goodwill is
capitalized.
114
In general, advertising costs should be expensed because of the uncertainty of the future benefits.
In those cases in which the future benefits are more certain, advertising costs should be capitalized.
This type of advertising involves targeted advertising to customers who have purchased products in
the past. This type of advertising is characterized by the ability to estimate how many customers will
respond favorably.
The Debate: R&D accounting will bring down the U.S. economy!
Economic Consequences
The requirement that U.S. firms expense all R&D costs puts them at a competitive disadvantage to
foreign firms. Foreign firms are able to capitalize R&D costs incurred after technological feasibility has
been established. This harms U.S. firms in the following ways:
Reported net income is lower. Lower income means that banks are less willing to loan money and
investors are less willing to invest.
Shortage of financing causes U.S. R&D firms to cut back their research activities.
A slowdown in U.S. research activity puts U.S. firms behind foreign firms in terms of technical
advancement.
We must not allow the FASB to cripple the U.S. economy!!!!
Efficient Market
Bankers and investors, with millions of dollars on the line, do not blindly read financial statements. They
are aware of the conservative R&D accounting rule set by the FASB, and they make the correct
adjustments to their valuation and forecasting models when they use the financial statements of
companies that perform R&D. Bankers and investors are interested in the economic performance of
companies, not in accounting performance. The claim that bankers and investors will reduce financing to
firms that report low net income as a result of expensing R&D implies that bankers and investors are
completely trusting of whatever numbers accountants choose to report. This is absurd!!!!
Ethical Dilemma: Dumping costs into a landfill
The general outline of facts in this ethical dilemma matches the actual facts of the Chambers
Development case. The same audit firm had been on the Chambers engagement for a number of years,
and former audit partners from the firm were employed by Chambers.
The heroes in this case were the members of the new team of auditors who were able to overcome the
obvious pressures to cover up the wrongful capitalization of landfill costs.
This case illustrates a difficult conflict between doing what is best for the firm that employs you and doing
what will please your immediate supervisor. If the auditors on the Chambers job had just ignored the
accounting irregularities they found, their audit firm could have been liable for huge damages in
subsequent years when the truth was finally revealed. So, it was clearly in the best interests of the audit
firm for the auditors to blow the whistle. However, a staff auditor would still be reluctant to raise the issue
with a manager or partner who may have approved the fishy accounting in previous years.
The accounting announcement on March 17, 1992, was just the beginning of troubles for Chambers.
Continuing business problems eventually forced the board of directors of Chambers to put the company
up for sale. Chambers was acquired by USA Waste on June 30, 1995.
115
Articles that contain more information on the interesting Chambers Development case include:
Gabriella Stern and Laurie P. Cohen, "Chambers Development Switches Accounting Plan," The Wall
Street Journal, March 19, 1992, p. B4.
Roula Khalaf, "Fuzzy Accounting," Forbes, June 22, 1992, p. 96.
Gabriella Stern, "Audit Report Shows How Far Chambers Would Go for Profits," The Wall Street Journal,
October 21, 1992, p. A1.
Cumulative Spreadsheet Analysis
See Cumulative Spreadsheet Analysis Solutions CD-ROM, provided with this manual.
Internet Search
1.
Total revenue
R&D
Advertising
As a percentage of
revenue:
R&D
Advertising
General
Electric
$125,913
2,349
n/a
1.9%
n/a
Procter &
Gamble
$40,238
1,601
3,773
4.0%
9.4%
Microsoft
$28,365
4,310
1,270
15.2%
4.5%
116