ANGELES UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION

SCHOOL OF LAW
LAW 1. LEGAL ETHICS
Second Semester AY 2014-2015
How can a lawyer take a case which he does not believe in?
The classical answer to the question is the familiar dialogue
Boswell: But what do you think of supporting a cause which you know to be bad?
Johnson: Sir, you do not know it to be good or bad till the judge determines it.
Lecturer:
Noel T. Canlas, B.S., Ll. B.
Phone: 0917-8172485; 0922-8619750; 0998-9982549 (mobile) 045-0454 (office)
E-mail: ntcanlas@gmail.com; noel.t.canlas@up.edu.ph
Course Meeting Information:
Mondays: 5:30pm-8:30pm
Consultation Hours by Appointment
Primary Sources: Constitution; Rules of Court; Code of Professional Responsibility, New Code
of Judicial Conduct; Supreme Court Decisions
Secondary Sources: Treatises, Casebooks, Law Review Articles, and Committee Reports.
Reference: Agpalo, Ruben, Legal and Judicial Ethics (2009, 8th Edition)
SYLLABUS
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Definition of Terms
a. Legal Ethics
b. Terms used to describe a member of the legal profession
- Lawyer, Attorney, or Attorney-At-Law, Practicing Lawyer, Trial Lawyer
- Advocate, Barrister, Counsel or Counselor.
- Proctor, Solicitor.
- Spanish: Abogado.
- Filipino: Manananggol.
c. counsel de parte
d. counsel de oficio
e. attorney of record
f. amicus curiae
g. bar
h. bench
i. attorney in fact
j. bar association
j. house counsel
k. lead counsel
l. Pro Se
c. Power to regulate practice of law [Art. VIII, Sec. 5(5), 1987 Constitution]

d. Duties of Attorneys (Rule 138, Sec 20)

e. FOUR-FOLD DUTIES OF A LAWYER - to SOCIETY; to the LEGAL PROFESSION; to the
COURT; and to the CLIENT.
f. Practice of Law is a Profession and Not a Business
II.

LEGAL PROFESSION

1. State Regulation
Supreme Court Constitution Art. VIII sec 5 (5)
Congress Constitution Art XII Sec 14 (2)Art. XVIII Sec.10
JUDICIAL CONTROL
a. Admission to practice is a judicial function
b. Legislative power to repeal, alter, or supplement
c. Executive power in relation to practice
d. Supreme Court incidental powers
B. What Constitutes Practice of Law
Cayetano v. Monsod, G.R. No. 100113, 201 SCRA 210 (1991)
Ruthie Lim-Santiago v. Atty. Carlos B. Sagucio, AC No. 6705, March 31, 2006
People vs. Villanueva 14 SCRA 111
3. Essential Criteria Determinative of Engaging In The Practice Of Law
Habituality, Compensation, Application of law, legal principle, practice, or procedure which
calls for legal knowledge,training and experience and Attorney-client relationship
III.

REQUIREMENTS FOR ADMISSION TO THE PRACTICE OF LAW

A. Legal Education
B. Educational Qualifications
Pre-Law: Rule 138 sec. 6, Rules of Court
Law Proper: Rule 138 Sec. 5, Rules of Court
C. Citizenship
Constitution, Art. XII Sec. 14(2)
D. Bar Examinations
Rules of Court 138 Secs. 7-16
Procedure for Admission
Aguirre vs Rana, BM 1036, June 10, 2003
E. Good Moral Character
Father Ranhilio C. Aquino et al vs. Atty. Edwin Pascua A.C. No.5095, November 28,
2007
In re: Judge Jaime V. Quitain, JBC No.013, August 22, 2007
Rodolfo M. Bernardo vs. Atty. Ismael F. Mejia, Adm Case No.2984, August 31, 2007
Velez vs. Atty. De Vera A.C. No. 6697, July 25, 2006
F. Law Student Practice Rule
Rule 138-A. Rules of Court
Cruz vs. Mina, GR No. 154207, April 27, 2007

G. The Lawyers Oath (Memorize this!)

In Re: Argosino, 270 SCRA 26
H. Membership in the IBP
In re: Atty. Marcial Edillion, AM 1928, August 3, 1978
IV.

CODE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY

THE LAWYER AND SOCIETY

Canon 1 Promote and Respect Law and Legal Process

2004 Rules on Notarial Practice
Zaldivar v. Gonzales, G.R. No. 79690, 166 SCRA 316 (1988)
Spouses Santuyo v. Hidalgo 448 SCRA 282 (2005)
Sicat v. Ariola 456 SCRA 93 (2005)
No Unlawful, Dishonest, Immoral, Deceitful Conduct Rule 1.01
Ui v. Bonifacio, Adm. Case No. 3319, June 8, 2000
Figueroa v. Barranco, SBC Case No. 519 276 SCRA 445 (1997)
Barrios v. Martines, AC No. 4585 442 SCRA 324 (2004)
Yupangco-Nakpil v. Atty. Roberto Uy, AC No. 9115, 14 September 2014
No Counseling to Defy Law Rule 1.02
Donton vs. Dr. Tansingco, AC No. 6057, June 27, 2006
Velez vs. Atty. De Vera A.C. No. 6697, July 25, 2006 (supra)
In re Terell 2 Phil 266 (1903)
Estrada v. Sandiganbayan 416 SCRA 465 (2003)
Not to Encourage Lawsuit or Proceedings Rule 1.03
Saburnido v. Madrono, AC No. 4497, 366 SCRA 1 (2001)
Linsangan vs. Atty. Tolentino, AC No. 6672, September 4, 2009
Encourage Client to Avoid Controversy Rule 1.04
Ysasi III vs NLRC, GR No. 104599, March 11, 1994
Castaeda v. Ago, G.R. No. L-28546, 65 SCRA 505 (1975)
Canon 2 Provide Efficient and Convenient Legal Services
Not to Reject The Cause of the Defenseless or Oppressed Rule 2.01
IBP Handbook, Guidelines Governing Establishment and Operation of Legal Aid Office,
Art. 1 Sec 1
Not to Refuse to Give Legal Advice Rule 2.02 (General Rule)
Santiago vs. Atty. Rafanan, AC No. 6252, October 5, 2004

Exceptions : Canon 14, Rule 14.01 and 14.02

Exception to the Exception : Canon 14, Rule 14.03
No Solicitation -- Rule 2.03
Rule 138 Sec. 27, Rules of Court
Linsangan vs. Atty. Tolentino, (supra)
A lawyer shall make clear whether he is acting in another capacity (Rule 15.08)
No Rates Lower Than Customarily Charged Rule 2.04
Canon 3 Information on Legal Services that is True, Honest, Fair, Dignified and Objective
No False or Unfair Claim re: Qualifications Rule 3.01
Khan v. Simbillo, AC 5299, 409 SCRA 299 (2003)
Ulep v. Legal Clinic, BM NO. 553, 223 SCRA 378 (1993)
In Re:Tagorda, 53 Phil 37 (1929)
No False of Misleading Firm Name Rule 3.02
Dacanay v. Baker and McKenzie 136 SCRA 349 (1985)
Partners Assuming Public Office Rule 3.03
Constitution Art. 6 sec. 14; Art. 7 sec 13; Art. 9 sec. 2
Samonte v. Gatdula, AM No. P-99-1292, 303 SCRA 756 (1999)
Not Use Media to Attract Legal Business Rule 3.04
Canon 4 Participate in Development: Support Legal Reforms and Administration of
Justice
Canon 5 Participate in Legal Education Program
Bar Matter 850 Mandatory Continuing Legal Education
Canon 6 Canons Apply to Lawyers in Government Service
RA 6713 Sec. 4 (Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees)
Collantes v. Renomeron, AC No. 3056, 200 SCRA 584 (1991)
Diana Ramos vs. Atty. Jose R. Imbang, AC No. 6788, August23, 2007
Primary Duty: That Justice is Done Rule 6.01
Cuenca vs CA, GR No. 109870, December 1, 1995
Not to Use Public Position for Private Interest Rule 6.02
Ali vs Atty. Bubong, AC No. 4018, March 8, 2005
Olazo vs. Justice Tinga, AM No. 10-5-7-SC, December 07, 2010
Not to Accept Employment After Government Service Rule 6.03

PCGG v. Sandiganbayan, 455 SCRA526 (2005)

RA 6713 sec. 7(b)
RA3019 sec. 3 (d)
Gisela Huyssen vs Atty. Fred L. Gutierrez, AC No. 6707, March24, 2006
PNB v. Cedo, AC No. 3701, 243 SCRA 1 (1995)
THE LAWYER AND THE LEGAL PROFESSION
Canon 7 Uphold Dignity and Integrity of the Profession
In re 1989 Elections of the IBP 178 SCRA 398 (1989)
Santos v. Llamas 322 SCRA 529 (2000)
Re: 2003 Bar Examinations BM 1222, Feb. 4, 2004
Letter of Atty. Cecilio Arevalo BM 1370 May 9, 2005
No False Statement Rule 7.01
Not to Support Unqualified Bar Applicant Rule 7.02
No Conduct Adversely Affecting the Profession Rule 7.03
Zaguirre v. Castillo 389 SCRA 659 (2003)
Canon 8 Courtesy, Fairness, Candor Towards Professional Colleagues
Que vs. Atty. Revilla Jr. AC No. 7054, December 4, 2009
Camacho v. Pagulayan 328 SCRA 631 (2000)
No Abusive and Improper Language Rule 8.01
Not to Encroach on Professional Employment Rule 8.02
L ins angan vs . Att y. T olenti no (s u pra)
Canon 9 Unauthorized Practice of Law
PP vs. Hon. Maceda, GR No. 89591-96, January 24, 2000
Zeta vs. Malinao, AM No. P-220, December 20, 1978
Tan and Pagayokan vs. Balajadia, GR No. 169517, March 14,2006
Aguirre v. Rana 403 SCRA 342 (2003)
Not to Delegate Work Rule 9.01
Not to Divide Legal Fees Rule 9.02
Lijauco vs. Atty. Terrado AC No. 6317, August 31, 2006
Plus Builders Inc. vs. Atty. Revilla Jr. AC No. 7056, September 13, 2006
THE LAWYER AND THE COURTS
Canon 10 Observe Candor, Fairness and Good Faith
Truthfulness Towards the Court Rules 10.01
Canon 32 ,CPE

Maligaya vs Atty. Donorilla Jr. AC No. 6198, September 15,2006

Manuel S. Sebastian vs Atty. Amily A. Bajar, AC No. 3731,September 7, 2007
Young v. Batuegas 403 SCRA 123 (2003)
Not to Misquote or Misrepresent Contents of Paper Rule 10.02
Insular Life Employees Co. v. Insular Life Association 37 SCRA 7 (1970)
Observe Rules of Procedure - Rule 10.03
Rule 138, Sec. 20 (d) Rules of Court
Canon 11 Respect Courts and Judicial Officers
Proper Attire Rule 11.01
Punctuality Rule 11.02
Proper Language and Behavior Rule 11.03
Atty. Barandon Jr. vs. Atty. Ferrer Sr. AC No. 5768, March 26, 2010
Ng vs. Atty. Alar, AC No. 7252, November 22, 2006
Sangalang v. IAC 177 Phil 87 (1989)
In the matter of proceedings for disciplinary action against Atty. Almacen In, GR No.
27654, February 18, 1970
Not to Attribute to Judge Motives Rule 11.04
Asean Pacific Planners et al vs. City of Urdaneta et al, GR No.162525, September 23,
2008
Judge Lacurom vs Atty. Jacoba, AC No. 5921, March 10, 2006
Grievances Against Judge Rule 11.05
Constitution Art VIII secs. 6 and 11
In the matter of proceedings for disciplinary action against Atty. Almacen In GR No.
27654, February 18, 1970
Canon 12 Assist in Speedy and Efficient Administration of Justice
Rule 138 Sec. 20 (g) Rules of Court
Adequate Preparation Rule 12.01 and Rule 18.02
De Espino vs Atty. Presquito, AM No. AC 4762, June 28, 2004
Forum Shopping Rule 12.02
Not to Delay Case Rule 12.03
Atty. Vaflor-Fabroa vs. Atty. Paguinto, AC No. 6273, March 15, 2010
Mattus v. Villaseca, A.C. No. 7922. October 1, 2013
Not Delay Or Impede The Execution Of Judgment or Misuse Court Process Rule 12.04
Bugaring and RBBI vs Hon Espanol, GR No. 133090, January19, 2001
Manila Pest Control vs WCC 25 SCRA 700 (1968)

Malonzo v. Principe 447 SCRA 1 (2004)

Proper Behavior; Lawyer Shall Not Harass Witness Rule 12. 05 Rule 12.07
Sambajon et al. vs Atty. Suing, AC No 7062, September 26, 2006
PD 1829 Penalizing Obstruction of Justice
Not to Testify on Behalf of Client Rule 12.08
PNB v. Uy Teng Piao 57 SCRA 337 (1932)
Duty to inform of clients death and change of counsels address - Rules of Court, Rule 3, Section 16
Canon 13 Refrain from Act Giving Appearance of Influence
Nestle Phil. V. Sanchez 154 SCRA 542 (1987)
In re de Vera 385 SCRA 285 (2003)
No Extraordinary Attention Rule 13.01
No Public Statements to Media Rule 13.02
Cruz v. Salva 105 Phil 1151 (1959)
Martelino v. Alejandro 32 SCRA 106 (1970)
In re Request Radio TV Coverage 360 SCRA 248 (2001)
Foodsphere, Inc. vs Atty. Mauricio Jr., AC No. 7199, July 22,2009
Not to Invite Outside Interference Rule 13.03
Maglasang v. People 190 SCRA 306 (1990)
THE LAWYER AND THE CLIENT
A. Nature of Lawyer-Client relationship
a. Relation as strictly personal
b. Relation as fiduciary and confidential
c. Rules protective of relation
B. The Concept of Retainer or Employment
a. Concept of Retainer and its Necessity (Rules of Court, Rule 138, Sec. 21)
b. Employment of a Law Firm
Canon 14 Service to the Needy
Availability of Services Regardless of Status Rule 14.01
Rule 138 sec 20 Rules of Court
Francisco vs. Atty. Portugal, AC No. 6155, March 14, 2006
Providing Counsel de Oficio Rule 14.02
Rule 138 Sec 31, 20 (h) Rule of Court
Rule 116 Sec 6-8
Rule 124 Sec 2
PD 543
In Re: Atty. Adriano, GR No. L-26868, February 27, 1969

A Lawyer Shall Not Decline Appointment By The Court Or By The IBP

Valid Ground for Refusal Rule 14.03
Perez vs. Atty. Dela Torre, AC 6160, March 30, 2006
Canoy vs. Atty. Ortiz, AC No. 5485, March 16, 2005
Same Standard of Conduct for Paying and Non-Paying Clients Rule 14.04
In Re: Atty. Adriano (supra)
Canon 15 Observe Candor, Fairness, Loyalty
Rule 138 Sec 3, Rules of Court
Aromin vs Boncavil : AC 5135 : September 22, 1999
Jardin vs Villar, A.C. No. 5474. August 28, 2003
Conflict of Interest Rule 15.01 and Rule 15.03
Atty. Jalandoni vs. Atty. Villarosa, AC No. 5303, June 15, 2006
Hornilla vs. Atty. Salunat, AC No. 5804, July 01, 2003
Gonzales vs. Atty. Cabucana, AC No. 6836, January 23, 2006
San Jose Homeowners v. Romanillo AC No. 5580 July 15,2005
Privileged Communication (To Preserve the Secrets of a Client) Rule 15.02
Diana Ramos vs. Atty. Jose R. Imbang (supra)
Ma. Luisa Hadjula vs. Atty. Roceles F. Madianda, AC No. 6711, July 03, 2007
Ethical Considerations In Taking a Bad Case
Mediator, Conciliator or Arbitrator -- Rule 15.04
Atty. Jalandoni vs. Atty. Villarosa (supra)
Candid, Honest Advice Rule 15.05
Rollon vs Atty. Naraval, AC No. 6424, March 04, 2005
Yu vs. Bondal, AC No. 5534, January 17, 2005
Not State or Imply Influence Rule 15.06
Reddi vs. Atty. Sebrio Jr. AC No. 7027, January 30, 2009
Impress Compliance with Laws Rule 15.07
Rural Bank of Calape, Inc. vs. Atty. Florido, AC No. 5736, June 18, 2010
Dual Profession Rule 15.08
Dr. Gamilla et al vs. Atty. Mario Jr. AC No. 4763, March 20,2003
Canon 16 Hold in Trust Clients Moneys and Properties

Art 1491, Civil Code

Account Rule 16.01
Atty. Salomon Jr. vs. Atty. Frial, AC No. 7820, September 12,2008
Almandarez Jr. vs. Atty. Langit, AC No.7057, July 25, 2006
Chua and Hsia vs. Atty. Mesina Jr. AC No. 4904, August 12,2004
Viray vs. Atty. Sanicas, AC No. 7337, 29 September 2014
Keep Clients Fund Separate Rule 16.02
Hernandez v. Go 450 SCRA 1 (2005)
Tarog vs. Atty. Ricafort, AC No. 8253, March 15, 2011
Delivery of Funds; Lawyers Lien Rule 16.03
Businos v. Ricafort 283 SCRA 40 (1997)
Quilban v. Robinol 171 SCRA 786 (1989)
No Borrowing, Lending Rule 16.04
Barnachea v. Quicho 399 SCRA 1 (2003)
Rubias v. Batiller 51 SCRA 120 (1973)
Canon 17 Trust and Confidence
Zabaljauregui Pitcher vs Atty. Gagate, AC No. 9532 (13 October 2013)
Cantiller v. Potenciano 180 SCRA 246 (1968)
Alisbo v. Jalandon 199 SCRA 321 (1991)
Ngayan v. Tugade 193 SCRA 779 (1991)
In re: Suspension of Atty Maquera from the Practice of Law BM 793 July 30, 2004
Canon 18 Competence and Diligence
Parias vs. Atty. Paguinto, AC No. 6297, July 13, 2004
Client Consent with Collaborating Counsel Rule 18.01
De Juan vs. Atty. Baria III, AC No. 5817, May 27, 2004
Rollon vs Atty. Naraval (supra)
Adequate Preparation Rule 18.02
Preparation of Pleadings, Interviewing the Witnesses, What to do in Case of Conflict of Trial
Dates, Adoption of System to Insure Receipt of Mails, Notice of Change of Address, Notice of
Death of Client
Fernandez vs. Atty. Novero Jr. AC No. 5394, December 02,2002
Not to Neglect Legal Matters Rule 18.03
Barbuco vs. Atty. Beltran, AC No. 5092, August 11, 2004
Endaya v. Oca 410 SCRA 344 (2003)
Dalisay v. Mauricio AC No. 5655 April 22, 2005
Inform Client on Status of Case Rule 18.04

Ruiz vs. Santos, GR No. 166386, January 27, 2009

Sps. Soriano vs. Atty. Reyes, AC No. 4676, May 04, 2006
Somosot vs. Atty. Lara, AC No. 7024, January 20, 2009
Canon 19 Representation with Zeal
Sambajon et al vs Atty. Suing (supra)
Fair and Honest Rule 19.01
Rule 138 sec 20 (d)
Pena vs. Atty. Aparicio, AC No. 7298, June 25, 2007
Que vs. Atty. Revilla Jr (supra)
Rectify Clients Fraud Rule 19.02
Pena vs. Atty. Aparicio (Supra)
Dalisay vs. Atty. Mauricio Jr (supra)
Donton vs. Dr. Tansingco (supra)
Control Proceedings Rule 19.03
Atty. Solidon vs. Atty. Macalalad, AC No. 8158, February 24, 2010
Canon 20 Attorneys Fees
Urban Bank v. Pena, G.R. No. 145817, 19 October 2011
RA 5185 sec 6
Rule 138 sec 24; 32 Rules of Court
Masmud vs. NLRC, GR No. 183385, February 13, 2009
Atty. Orocio vs. Angulan et al, GR No. 179892-93, January 30,2009
Quirante v. IAC 169 SCRA 769 (1989)
Metrobank v CA 181 SCRA 367 (1981)
Research Services v. CA 266 SCRA 731 (1997)
Fee Guide Rue 20.01
Clients Consent of Fees for Referral Rule 20.02
Urban Bank v. Pena 364 SCRA 597 (2001)
Clients Consent of Acceptance of Fee Rule 20.03
Rule 138 sec20 (e)
Avod Compensation Controversy with Client Rule 20.04
Rule 138 sec 24, 32 Rules of Court
Ramos vs. Atty. Ngaseo, AC No. 6210, December 9, 2004
Canon 21 Preserve Clients Confidence
Rule 138 sec 20(e) Rules of Court
Rule 130 sec21 (b)
Art. 208 Revised Penal Code

10

Hilado v David 83 Phil 569 (1949)

Bun Siong Yao vs. Atty. Leonardo A. Aurelio, AC No. 7023, March 30, 2006
Genato v Silapan 406 SCRA 75 (2003)
Junio vs. Atty. Grupo, AC No. 5020, December 18, 2001
Revelations of Confidence and Secrets Allowed Rule 21.01
Use of Information Received in Course of Employment Allowed Rule 21.02
Uy vs. Atty. Gonzales, AC No. 5280, March 30, 2004
Prohibition to Giving Information to Outside Agency Rule 21.03
Protection from Disclosure Rule 21.04 21.05
Prohibition of Indiscreet Conversation Rule 21.06
Not to Reveal that Lawyer was Consulted Rule 21.07
Cf Rule 15.01, Rule 14.03
Canon 22 Withdrawal of Services For Good Cause
Good Causes for Withdrawal of Services Rule 22.01
Domingo v Aquino 38 SCRA 472 (1971)
Felicisimo M. Montano vs. IBP and Atty. Juan S. Dealca, AC No. 4215, May 21, 2001
Elisa V. Venterez et al vs. Atty. Rodrigo R. Cosme, AC No.7421, October 10, 2007
In Re: Atty. David Briones, AC No. 5486, August 15, 2001
Lim Jr vs. Atty. Villarosa (supra)
Duties of Lawyer Who Withdraws Rule 22.02
Obando v. Figueras 322 SCRA 148 (2000)
I V.N E W C O D E O F J U D I C I A L C O N D U C T
1.CANON 1 INDEPENDENCE
In Re:
Allegations MadeUnder Oath at the SenateBlue Ribbon Committee
HearingAgainst Associte Justice Gregory S. Ong, AM No. SB-14-21-J, 23 September 2014
1.01 Independent Judgment
Ramirez v. Macandog, 144 SCRA 634
1.02 Independence from Colleagues Rule 1.02
Tahil v. Eisma, 64 SCRA 378
1.3 Refrain from Influencing Outcome of Litigation
Contreras v. Solis, 260 SCRA 572
1.4

Not to Allow Social Relations to Influence Judgment

Romero v. Valle, 147 SCRA 197

11

1.05 N o Inappropriate Connections With O ther Branches of

Government
Galman v. SB, 144 SCRA 43
1.06 Independent in Relation to Parties
Lorenzo v. Marquez, 162 SCRA 546
1.7 Safeguards for Discharge of Judicial Duties
Salud v. Alumbres, 404 SCRA 411
2.CANON 2 INTEGRITY
2.01. Conduct Above Reproach; Perception
Alfonso v. Juanson, 228 SCRA 239
2.02Reaffirm People's Faith in Judiciary
Castillo v. Calanog, 199 SCRA 75
2.03Initiate Dis ciplinar y Action Against Erring Law yers
In re Sotto, 82 Phil. 595
3 .CA NON 3 IMPARTI AL I TY
Jamsani-Rodrigues v Justice Gregory S. Ong, et al., A.M. No. 08-19-SB-J, 24 August 2010
3.1 Without Fear or Factor
In re Aguas, 1 Phil. 1
3.02 Enhances Confidence of the Public
Cabulisan v. Pagalilauan, 297 SCRA 593
3.3 M inimize O ccas ions for D isqualification
Paredes v. Abad, 56 SCRA 522
3.4

Comments on Proceedings
Facundo v. Berjamen, 180 SCRA 235
3.05Disqualification
Aparicio v. Andal, 175 SCRA 569
Gandioncov. P0aranda, 155 SCRA 725

3.6

Disclosure
Lorenzo v. Marquez, 162 SCRA 546
CANON 4 PROPRIETY

12

4 . 0 1 Avo i d a n c e o f I m p r o p r i e t y
Talens v. Arceo, 259 SCRA 354
4.02Dignity
Liwanag v. Lustre, 306 SCRA 55
4.03 Relations with Lawyers
People v. Maceda, 188 SCRA 532
4.4

Family Associated with Case

Javier v. de Guzman, 192 SCRA 434

4.5 Use of Residence

5.1.5.5

4.06Free Expression
OCA v. Judge Floro, 486 SCRA 66
4.07Fiduciary Interests
4.08 Advancing Private Interests
Aquino v. Lontok, 184 SCRA 177
4.9 Confidential Information
Umale v. Villaluz, 51 SCRA 84
4.10

Other Activities
In re Manzano, 166 SCRA 246

4.11Practice of Law
Tuazon v. Purugganan, 370 SCRA 511
4.12 Form Associations
4.13-4.15Gifts and Favors
Ompoc v. Torres, 178 SCRA 14
CANON

EQUALITY

Equality of Treatment
People v. lbasan, 129 SCRA 695
CANON 6 COMPETENCE AND DILIGENCE
In
Re:
Anonymous
Letterdated
August
12,
2010,
complaining against Judge Ofelia T. Pinto, Regional Trial Court,

13

Branch 60, Angeles

October 2012

City, Pampanga,

A.M.

No.

RT J- 11- 2 28 9,

Office of the Court Administrator vs HON.

C AS TAN ED A, A .M . N o. R TJ -1 2- 23 16 , 9 Oc to be r 2 01 2

LIBERTY

2
0.

6.1 Precedence of Duties

OCA v. Lansang, 186 SCRA 646
6.02 Judicial Duties
Longboan v. Polig, 186 SCRA 547
6.3 Keeping up with Developments
People v. Salas, 143 SCRA 163
6.4

International Law
Enriquez v. Caminade, 485 SCRA 98

6.5

Efficient and Prompt Delivery

Sangguniang Panlalawigan v. Albano, 260 SCRA 561

6.6

Order and Decorum

Romero v. Valle, 147 SCRA 197
6.07 Incompatible Conduct
GRADING PLAN
A.

Examinations

Mid-Term Exam 30%

Final Exam - 40%
There will be no make up exams. If an exam is missed, the students score for the missed
exam will be O.
B.
C.

Case Digest Logbook 15%

Class Participation & Attendance 15%

14