Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
I.
INTRODUCTION
978-1-4244-3531-9/08/$25.002008 IEEE
II.
MODELING
D
q
ZD
M
D
D
q
1 D 0
G
M q q M G z z
(1)
1 0 D
0 1 q
(2)
(3)
(4)
y3 I2 u3
b
c
100
s 100
w
(5)
GV
GH
2V (Vmax Vmin )
Vmax Vmin
(6)
2 H ( H max H min )
H max H min
(7)
0.0525 0.0047GV
0.014G H 0.0012GV G H
M D (GV , G H )
M q (GV , G H )
M G z (GV , G H )
y1
I1 u y I2 u
1 2
2
D
A(GV , G H ) B(GV , G H )G z
q
( a bI2 cI1I2 2 ) w
)
I1 0 0 y1
0 I
0 y2
2
0 0 I2 y3
u1
u
2
u3
(15)
Fu (Q, ))
(16)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(14)
(8)
z (I1 , I2 )
Q
0
0
0 1 u1
1 0 0 0 u
2
0 c 0 b u3
0 0 1 a w
y1
y
2
y3
z
(13)
AZD
CZD
BZD
DZD
(17)
y2
w
u 4
'MGz
w3
z4
MGz
w2
' Mq
z3 w1
' ZD
Mq
ZD
1
s
1
s
' MD
z1
y1
z2
MD
Figure 2. Block diagram of LPV model
TABLE I.
D
q
w1
w2
w3
w4
y
1
y2
DzD
DMD
BzD
B
MD
0
1
0
CzD
DM q
CM D
CM q
CM G
AzD
AMD
BM q
AM q
AM G
1
'
DM G D
z
q
0
z
0 1
z2 (18)
0
z3
BM G z
z
4
0 u
0
(19)
(20)
'
y
The poles of the state space model and the LFT model of
AHV at one of the trim points chosen randomly are both given
in Table 1, and used to validate the LFT model of AHV. We
can find that there is little difference between these poles.
Consequently the LFT model can present the dynamics of
AHV exactly.
III.
CONTROLLER DESIGN
0
GV I 5u5
0
G H I 3u3
(21)
Win
K u
s 180
s 1.8
Wc
(23)
AG
Ge
' in
diag(
, )
120 30
(24)
w' '
G
z'
Wr y
id
Figure 4. Structure for controller synthesis
0.1
Wc
n
r
(22)
'
-0.0662
Wp
0.0545
-0.0667
Wr
0
GV I r1u r1
0
I
G
H r 2u r 2
0.052
zc
Wn
Wp
zp
1
0.8
s 1
, 0.025)
s 100
Alpha (degree)
Wn
1.2
(25)
10
s 1.5
s 1500
>r
0
-0.2
>r
y@ .
z p
'
z'
P( s )
y
K ( s)
REFERENCES
[1]
IV.
zc ,
w'
Time (s)
(26)
0.4
0.2
Win
0.6
CONCLUSION
Fidan B., Mirmirani M., and Ioannous P. A., Flight dynamics and
control of air-breathing hypersonic vehilces: review and new direction,
AIAA 12th International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and
Technologies, Nofolk, Virginia, AIAA 2003-7081.
[2] H. Bushcek, and A. J. Calise, Uncertainty modeling and fixed-oreder
controller design for a hypersonic vehicle model, AIAA Journal of
Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 20. pp. 42-48, January, 1997.
[3] I. Gregory, J. McMinn and J. Shaughnessy, Hypersonic vehicle control
law development using H f and P synthesis, AIAA 4th International
Aerospace Planes Conference, Orlando, FL, AIAA 92-5010.
[4] P. Lohsoonthorn, E. Jonckheer and S. Dalzell, Eigenstructure vs
constrained H f design for hypersonic winged cone, Journal of
Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 648-658, June,
2001.
[5] K. P. Groves, D. O. Sigthorsson, A. Serrani, S. Yurkovich, M. A.
Bolender, and D. B. Doman, Reference command tracking for a
linearized model of an air-breathing hypersonic vehicle, AIAA
Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, San
Francisco, California, AIAA 2005-6144.
[6] W. J. Rush and J. S. Shamma, Research on gain scheduling,
Automatica, vol. 36, pp. 1401-1425, October, 2000.
[7] K. S. Gunnarsson and J. O. Jacobsen, Design and simulation of a
parameter varying controller for a fighter aircraft, AIAA Guidance,
Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Montreal, Canada,
AIAA 2001-4105.
[8] Biannic, J. M. and Apkarian, P., Missile autopilot design via a modified
LPV synthesis technique, Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 3,
No. 3, pp. 153160, 1999.
[9] Roy Smith and Asif Ahmed, Robust parametrically varying attitude
controller designs for the X-33 vehicle, AIAA Guidance, Navigation
and Control Conference and Exhibit, Denver, CO, AIAA 2000-4158.
[10] Xingfang, Qian, Ruixiong, Lin and Yanan Zhao, Missile Flight
Dynamics, Beijing, CHINA: Beijing Institute of Technology Press, 1999
(in Chinese).
[11] Breton M. R., Gain-scheduled aircraft control using linear parameter
varying feedback, Ohio, Air Force Institute of Technology, 1996.