Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ABSTRACT
Inflammatory airway disease has been linked to exerciseinduced pulmonary hemorrhage (EIPH), and consequently, we hypothesized that immunomodulation via
concentrated equine serum (CES) treatment would reduce EIPH as evidenced by red blood cell (RBC) concentrations in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Separate
trials were conducted on Thoroughbred horses treated
with either CES (n 6) or placebo (0.9% saline; n 4).
All horses completed pre-treatment and post-treatment
(2 and 4 weeks after initiating treatment) maximal exercise tests on a 10% inclined treadmill (1 m/s/min increments to fatigue) over a 10-week period (23 weeks
between tests), with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) performed 30 minutes after exercise. Treatment ensued 10
days after the pre-treatment exercise test, with horses receiving a series of five CES or placebo injections 24 hours
apart (20 mL intratracheal and 10 mL intravenously),
with subsequent weekly injections for 5 weeks thereafter.
After CES treatment, both EIPH (RBC in BALF) and inflammation (white blood cell concentration [WBC] in
BALF) were significantly diminished by the 4-week posttreatment run, demonstrating 46 12% and 24 11%
decreases, respectively (P < 0.05). In contrast, EIPH
was elevated significantly at the 4-week time point, and inflammation remained constant in the placebo trial. In
conclusion, these preliminary data suggest that therapeutic intervention involving immunomodulation may represent a viable approach to reducing the severity of EIPH.
Keywords: Exercise-Induced Pulmonary Hemorrhage;
Horse; Bronchoalveolar lavage; Immunomodulation;
Inflammatory airway disease
INTRODUCTION
Evidence for exercise-induced pulmonary hemorrhage
(EIPH) can be found in virtually all racehorses in training1-3
and can be a cause for poor performance4,5 as well as potential
premature athletic retirement. In addition, epidemiologic6
and post-mortem7-9 studies have identified an association between EIPH and inflammatory airway disease (IAD). Furthermore, it is often necessary for additional veterinary care,
extended breaks from training, or permanent racetrack
banishment for those horses responding poorly to treatment.
Existing therapies for EIPH (ie, furosemide and the equine
nasal strip)10,11 are successful in reducing, but not completely
abolishing, EIPH, even when used concurrently, which
suggests that EIPH has complex and multifactorial causes.
Therefore, it may be beneficial to investigate a therapy that
could either provide an alternative strategy (ie, reduce inflammatory component) or additive reductions in EIPH.
Concentrated equine serum (CES; Sera, Inc., Shawnee
Mission, KS) is a biologic serum aggregate collected from
multiple draft horse donors, containing high levels of immunoglobulins, complement, and other serum proteins.
The equine-derived CES (an intravenous and intratracheally
administered product) and a goat-derived product called
caprine serum fraction (CSF; administered intramuscularly;
Colorado Serum Co., Denver, CO), have demonstrated evidence for reducing the chronic inflammation associated
with lower airway disease (ie, IAD and EIPH) via immunomodulation in separate studies.12,13 Additional support
comes from endoscopic evidence in racetrack field trials
(Sera, Inc., Shawnee Mission, KS).14 Immunomodulation
via intravenous immunoglobulin has been successfully used
to treat asthma and systemic inflammatory conditions in humans.15-19 However, no studies have been conducted to specifically examine the effectiveness of CES as a treatment for
EIPH in racehorses. Thus, we hypothesized that CES would
reduce EIPH (RBC in BALF) and pulmonary inflammation
(decreased WBC in BALF) following maximal exercise.
527
528
529
pre-treatment
exercise test
&
post-exercise
BAL #2
Day 0
14
27 28
17 18 19 20 21
34 35
48
41 42
CES or PL
injections
CES or PL
injections
Baseline
(resting)
BAL #1
4-week post-treatment
exercise test
&
post-exercise
BAL #6
CES or PL
injections
CES or PL
injections
BAL #3
BAL #5
daily administration
BAL #7
of CES or PL
CES Treated
PL Treated
400
300
200
46 12 % in EIPH
during CES Treatment
100
0
1
Run
500
Figure 1. Timeline of experimental protocol. BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; CES, concentrated equine serum; PL,
placebo (0.9% saline). Both CES and PL were administered at a dose of 20 mL intratracheally and 10 mL intravenously
at each time point.
160
CES Treated
PL Treated
120
80
*
24 11 % in Inflammation
during CES Treatment
40
0
1
530
intravascular (furosemide)10 and extravascular (equine nasal strip)10,11 pressures and that can be modulated independent of changes in these pressures, because no alterations
_ 2 in the current study (Table 1).
were seen in Ppa or VO
One major difference between acute treatments (eg, equine
nasal strip and furosemide) and CES is the 4 weeks necessary
to evoke a reduction in EIPH. The delayed time-dependent
mechanism of CES may be consequent to mitigation of the
prolonged inflammatory response to blood in the alveoli
and altered compliance and resistance during breathing
that ultimately predisposes a greater number of capillaries
to stress failure with each succeeding EIPH episode.21,23,24
The placebo trial, although conducted with somewhat lighter bleeders and at a different time, showed a much different
pattern, in that EIPH increased over time, which is in agreement with the current literature.3,25
The BAL technique as used herein has several distinct advantages. Specifically, it samples that region of the lung
where EIPH primarily occurs (ie, dorsocaudal lobes)26
and, unlike endoscopy, is sensitive enough to detect
EIPH without the necessity for the blood to track up the
Table 1. Pre- and post-placebo (PL) and concentrated equine serum(CES) treatment comparisons for cardiorespiratory and metabolic variables during maximal exercise and bronchoalveolar lavage variables post-exercise
Variable
_ 2max (L/min)
VO
_
VCO
2max (L/min)
PaO2 (mmHg)
PaCO2 (mmHg)
HR max (beats/min)
RRmax (breaths/min)
[La-] (mM)
Ppa (mmHg)
pH
Hematocrit
Time-to-fatigue (s)
Treatment
Pre-treatment Run
(Baseline Run)
2-Week Post-treatment
Run
4-Week Post-treatment
Run
PL
CES
PL
CES
PL
CES
PL
CES
PL
CES
PL
CES
PL
CES
PL
CES
PL
CES
PL
CES
PL
CES
72.9 2.0
73.7 1.9
82.8 3.3
81.0 2.4
63.4 1.3
64.9 2.7
61.7 3.9
64.2 4.1
218 2
219 4
115 3
121 2
21.9 3.3
25.3 3.2
87.3 7.3
96.1 6.2
7.22.02
7.18.04
59 1
63 1
672 25
711 14
75.4 2.6
67.7 5.6
86.5 1.3
76.5 6.1
65.0 3.0
64.1 2.0
62.0 4.2
63.8 3.7
219 5
224 8
115 2
120 2
29.6 1.7
28.8 3.2
91.4 3.1
95.7 6.9
7.22.02
7.21.03
61 1
63 1
661 24
679 9
76.5 2.3
71.9 3.1
85.9 2.2
81.0 3.7
60.9 1.5
62.4 1.7
62.0 2.6
67.5 4.0
214 4
216 4
115 2
121 2
26.5 4.6
32.6 1.7
89.2 3.9
97.0 4.6
7.18.02
7.19.04
61 1
63 1
673 15
682 12
531
532
25. Mason DK, Collins EA, Watkins KL. Respiratory system. In:
Snow DH, Persson SGB, Rose RJ, eds. Equine exercise physiology.
Cambridge, UK: Granta Editions; 1983:5763.
26. McKane SA, Rose RJ. Radiographic determination of the location of
a blindly placed bronchoalveolar lavage catheter. Equine Vet J 1993;
5:329332.
27. Erickson HH and Poole DC. Exercise-induced pulmonary hemorrhage: Current Concepts In: Lekeux P, ed. Equine respiratory diseases. Ithaca, NY: International Veterinary Information Service
(www.ivis.org); 2007.
28. Epp TS, McDonough P, Padilla DJ, Gentile JM, Edwards KL,
Vet J 1990;22:174176.
30. Hinchcliff KW. Counting red cells: is it the answer to EIPH? Equine
13. Hamm D, Willeford KO, White G, Reed SM, Hamm J. Caprine serum fraction immunomodulator as supplemental treatment of lower
Vet J 2000;32:362363.
31. Grondahl G, Johannisson A, Jensen-Waern M. Opsonic effect of equine
14. Erickson HH, Epp TS, Poole DC. Review of alternative therapies for
15. Rabinovitch N, Gelfand EW, Leung DYM. The role of immunoglobulin therapy in allergic diseases. Allergy 1999;54:662668.
14:705716.
36. Wong CW, Smith SE, Thong YH, Opdebeedk JP, Thornton JR. Effects of exercise on various immune functions in horses. Am J Vet Res
1992;53:14141417.
37. Hand WL, King-Thompson NL. Effect of erythrocyte ingestion on
macrophage antibacterial function. Infect Immunol 1983;40:917
923.
38. Step DL, Freeman KP, Gleed RD, Hackett RP. Cytologic and endo-
20. Epp TS, McDonough P, Padilla DJ, Cox JH, Poole DC, Erickson HH.
30:126130.
249253.
22. Rush BR, Krakowka S, Robertson JT, Cummins JM. Cytologic eval-
40. Laegreid WW, Huston LJ, Basaraba RJ, Crisman MV. The effects of
Vet J 1995;27:4650.