Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
JAW CRUSHER
EX.NO: 01
DATE:
AIM:
To determine the crushing law constants and to calculate the work index using
jaw crusher
THEORY:
Size reduction equipments are classified into,
1) Coarse crusher 2) Intermediate crusher 3) Fine grinders and Ultra fine grinders.
Jaw crusher is a slow speed crushing machines used for coarse crushing and reduction
of large lumps of very hard materials. The mechanism of crushing involves two steps.
Opening up and small cracks present followed by formation of new surface area.
The feed of jaw crusher is admitted between two jaws set at a opening at top. In a
jaw crusher, the particles are compressed to reduce them in size. The crushing laws used
to calculate power for size reduction are Kicks law, Rittingers law and bonds law.
FORMULAE:
Kicks law
: P/M = Kk ln (Dsa/Dsb)
Rittingers law:
Bonds law
Where,
KK
KR
KB
Dsa
PROCEDURE:
1 kg of granite sample was weighed. The average size of particle was found by
volume displacement method. The jaw crusher was switched on and the time taken (t 1) by
energy meter disc to make one revolution without load was noted. The sample was fed to
crusher and number of revolutions made by the energy meter disc and total crushing time
(t2) was noted. A sample was collected by employing cone and quatering method. The
sieve analysis was carried out and average size of product was found by differential and
cumulative analysis. The crushing law constants and work index are calculated.
OBSERVATIONS:
1. Weight of the sample
= N/t2
FEED ANALYSIS:
Volume of water displaced
= (6V/)
TABULATION 1: ANALYSIS
S.NO
Mesh no
Dp n m
Dnm
1/D n
W Kg
n/ Dp n
RESULT:
Differential Analysis
Kicks law
(Kw hr /ton)
Rittingers law
(Kw hr m /ton)
Bonds law
(Kw hr mm/ton)
Work Index
(Kw hr /ton)
Cumulative Analysis
ROLL CRUSHER
EXPT.NO:02
DATE
AIM:
To determine the Angle of Nip, Power consumption, Reduction Ratio, Theoretical
Capacity and Actual capacity of the crusher operating at the given speed.
THEORY:
Two heavy smooth rolls turning on parallel horizontal axes are the
working element of the roller crusher. Particle fed are caught between the rolls and
broken. They are used for feed size to 3 and product size of to 20 mesh. To
allow unbreakable material to pass through without damaging the machine atleast one of
the rolls should be spring mounted. The rolls have narrow faces and larger diameter and
turn towards each other with same speed. The particle size depends upon the distance
between the rolls and the capacity of the given machine. Smooth roll crusher have few
fines and virtually no over size. The angle of nip is the angle between the roll faces at the
level where the particle enters the crushing zone.
FORMULAE:
Power consumption with out load P1= 1/(K 3600/t1) KW
Power consumption with load P2
=1/(K 3600/t2) KW
Angle of nip
=2
Cos
=(R+d) / (R+r)
Reduction ratio
= Df / Dn
By differential analysis Dn
=1/(n /Dn )
By cumulative analysis Dp
=1/ (n /Dp )
Where
K
t1
=Time taken by energy meter disc for one revolution without load
t2
= Time taken by the energy meter disc for one revolution with load
2d
Df
Dn
PROCEDURE:
The rolls diameter, the gap and the clearance between the rolls are noted. Weigh
one kg of material and find the average diameter by volume displacement method. The
equipment is switched on and the time taken by the energy meter disc for one revolution
without load is noted. The sample is fed mainly one by one and the number of revolution
and time taken for crushing is noted down. The sample of product is taken for analysis
using cone and quartering method. The product average diameter is found out by
differential and cumulative analysis. The Angle of nip, Power consumption, Reduction
ratio, Theoretical capacity and actual capacity of the roller crusher are calculated.
TABULATION 1:
Sl.No.
Mesh No
OBSERVATION:
9
DPn
Dn
n/Dn
1/Dn
Density
Time taken for one revolution by the energy meter disc with out load(t1)
Time taken for one revolution by the energy meter with load(t2)
10
RESULT:
Angle of nip (2)
Reduction ratio:
11
By differential
By cumulative
BALL MILL
EXPT.NO:03
DATE
AIM:
To find the (a) New surface area created (b) Critical speed of the ball mill
THEORY:
A ball mill is a low speed machine used for fine grinding. In operation the balls
are picked up by the mill wall and carried near to the top where they break contact with
the wall and fall back to the bottom to provide impact. Centrifugal force keeps the ball in
contact with the wall. Most of the grinding takes place at the zone of impact and some by
slipping & rolling against each other by attrition.
If the speed is too high, the balls are carried over along the mill walls and the mill
is said to be centrifuging. The speed at which centrifuging starts is called critical speed.
Little or no grinding occurs at this condition, hence the operating speed of the mill should
be less than the critical speed. Cascading refers to rolling of the balls from the top to the
bottom of the load. Catracting refers to the throwing of the balls through the air to the top
of the heap.
FORMULAE:
The specific surface area of the feed and the product are calculated using the
following relation;
By differential analysis, AW = [ 6 / (s p ) ] [ n / Dpn]
By cumulative analysis, AW = [ 6 / (s p ) ] [ n / Dpn]
Critical speed, Nc
12
=(1/2) [g / (R r)]1/2
PROCEDURE:
The radius of the ball and ball mill was measured and the critical speed of the ball
mill is calculated. The feed material is differentially and cumulatively analysed & the
specific surface area is found out. 1 kg of the feed material is fed to the ball mill along
with the grinding media. The mill is run for half an hour and at the end of the crushing
the surface area of the product is found out by differential and cumulative analysis. New
surface area created is found out using the above data.
OBSERVATION:
Radius of the ball mill [R]
13
14
Mesh No.
Dn m
Dpn m
1 / Dpn m
W Kg
n / Dpn m
15
Mesh No.
Dn m
Dpn m
1 / Dpn m
W Kg
n / Dpn m
RESULT:
(a) New surface area created: By differential analysis
By cumulative analysis
16
AIM:
a) To determine the average particle diameter of the sample by differential &
cumulative analysis.
b) To determine the effectiveness of a screen by analyzing feed, oversize and
undersize for the given sample.
THEORY:
Sieve analysis is one of the most important operation for determining the size of
the material. The standard screens normally in practice are;
i)
ii)
iii)
Testing sieves are made of wire screens, the mesh & dimensions are carefully
standardized. The set of screens is based on the opening of the 200-mesh screen,
which is
established at 0.074mm. The area of openings in one screen is exactly 2 times that of
the openings in the next smaller screen.
Effectiveness of a screen is method of the success of a screen in closely separating
materials A & B. A common measure of screen effectiveness is the ratio of oversize
material that is actually in the feed. Similarly the effectiveness based on B is defined
as the ratio of mass of B in the underflow to the amount of B entering the feed.
17
FORMULAE:
Surface volume mean diameter (Dvs) :By differential analysis, Dvs = 1 / [ n / Dpn]
By cumulative analysis, Dvs = 1 / [ n / Dpn]
Screen effectiveness can be derived by doing a material balance over a given
screen and represented by
E = (XF - XB ) XD (XD - XF ) ( 1 - XB ) / (XD - XB )2 XF ( 1 XF )
Where;
XF
XD
XB
( 1 XF )
( 1 XD )
( 1 XB )
PROCEDURE:
500 grams of sand is weighed accurately. It is screened using a set of sieves in
sieve shaker for 15 minutes; for analyzing the feed. The overflow and underflow of the
sieve for which the effectiveness is to be determined is taken and analyzed separately. A
graph is plotted between 1 / D pn and n for feed to determine Dvs by cumulative analysis
and n Vs Dpn for differential analysis determination. Another plot of n Vs Dpn is drawn
for underflow, overflow and feed to get the values of X F, XD and XB. From these three
values the effectiveness of the screen is calculated.
18
Sl.No.
19
Mesh No.
Dn m
Dpn m
W Kg
FEED ANALYSIS
20
1 / Dpn m
n / Dpn m
Mesh No.
Dpn m
W Kg
21
Mesh No.
Dpn m
W Kg
RESULT:
Surface volume mean diameter (Dvs) :By differential analysis, Dvs =
By cumulative analysis, Dvs =
Effectiveness of
22
mesh screen
AIM:
To determine the specific cake resistance and filter medium resistance Rm using
a plate and frame filter press.
THEORY:
A more satisfactory and more versatile type of filter is the plate and
frame filter press. It is made up of solid plates and hollow frames assembled alternatively
and filter cloths are kept on either side of the frame. During initial filtration slurry at
constant pressure introduced to hollow frame. The filtrate passes through the filter cloth
and forms a bed between frames. When filtration is continued further, filtrate passes
through the filter cloth and is collected in the filtrate tank. Plate and frame filter is a batch
filter and used when the cost of labour per unit volume of product is quiet low. Kozeny
Carman equation is used for filtration equipments.
FORMULAE:
= 2 A2(1-mw) P / w c
(m2/kg)
Rm
= w Vf / A (1-mw)
(m-1)
= Density of filtration.Kg/m3
= Viscosity of filtration.Ns/m2
Vf
Where
23
= Area of filtration
OBSERVATIONS:
Weight of the watch glass
Volume of filtrate
= wt of CaCO3
wt of CaCO3 + wt of H2O
PROCEDURE:
8 lit of CaCO3 has been prepared and it was fed in to a slurry tank to maintain
required pressure of 1 kgf/cm3 in it. The inlet valve of filter is opened and filtration was
started. The stopwatch was started when first drop of filtrate was collected and time taken
for every 2 cm rise in level of the filtrate was noted. After filtration was over, a portion of
the cake in the tray was taken and weighed. Then the cake dried and weighed once again
and Rm were calculated and repeated.
24
TABULATION 1:
,sec
H m
25
sec
V f m3
V m3
/V sec/m3
Vavg m3
RESULT:
26
CYCLONE SEPERATOR
EXPT.NO:06
DATE
AIM:
a) To find separation efficiency and frictional loss of the given cyclone separator.
b) To draw a graph between efficiency and pressure drop.
THEORY:
The cyclone separator is based on the principle of settling with accelerated
centrifugal force. At any point ion the cyclone there are three components of velocity
namely; a) radial component which acts inward. b) Tangential component which
predominates throughout the depth near the walls. c) Axial component which acts away
from the gas inlet near the wall and towards the central cone where a low pressure and
highly turbulent exists. Any particle will subject to two forces along the radial direction.
The centrifugal force tends to throw it towards the wall but the drag force helps the fluid
to carry away the particles. Both these forces are function of radius of rotation and the
size of particle. Radial acceleration is given by a c= wr2=bn/rn , where b and n are constants
and the value of exponent n lies between 2 and 2.4.
FORMULAE:
27
Rm
= (h1-h2)10-2 m
= Rm (m-f)/f
Vth
= [2gh] 0.5
Qth
Pcy
= Rm (m-f) g
Acy
=d2/4
Fcy
Vth
= Theoretical velocity
Qth
Pcy
Acy
Fcy
Dcy
= Diameter of cyclone
= Separation efficiency
PROCEDURE:
Weigh 300 gm of granular solid particle and place it in the feed chute. Start the
blower and select a particular flow rate. Note down the orifice meter readings and the
pressure drop across the cyclone. After reaching the steady state weigh the collected
sample. Repeat the procedure for different flow rates. Tabulate the readings and calculate
the efficiency.
28
TABULATION 1
S. No
Orifice
Reading
m
S.No
Vth
29
Hm
Cyclone
Reading
m
Qth
Time
sec
Weight of
sample collected
m
Mass flow
rate of air
Kg/s
Mass flow
rate of solid
Kg/s
Fcy
RESULT:
Separation Efficiency
Frictional Loss
BEAKER DECANTATION
30
EXPT.NO:07
DATE :
AIM:
To find the particle size distribution and the average size of the particles.
THEORY:
Beaker decantation is a method used for finding the size of the powder sample to
separate the mixture of particles into different size ranges; settling principle is used. The
movement of particles through the fluid requires the density difference between the
particles and the fluid medium. Greater the difference, more effective will be the
separation process. Homogenous materials are separated on the basis of their sizes. The
settling of particles is assumed to be free settling and it falls under Stokes region.
FORMULAE:
Terminal settling velocity is given by the formula:
Ut
X1
=W1-W2
X2
=2W2-W3
X3
=2W3 W4
X4
= Total X1- X2 - X3
Dp
Where
31
PROCEDURE:
Weigh 15 gms of the powder and transfer it into one of the beakers provided. The
water is added and the slurry is made up to the level marked in the beaker. The size of the
particles are assumed to be 60, 60/(2)
0.5
terminal settling velocities and the settling time are calculated. The slurry is stirred well
and the stopwatch is started just when stirring is stopped.
The slurry is allowed to settle for the calculated time of 60 micron particles. Then
the slurry is decanted into the next beaker leaving the settled solids at the bottom. The
slurry is made up to the level by adding water. The above mentioned procedure is
repeated for different sizes. The settled solids are filtered individually for various sizes in
previously weighed filter papers, dried, weighed again to get the different rough weights
W1, W2,W3, W4 - The correct weight for various fractions are calculated as follows:
32
TABULATION 1
Sl.No
Dp m
33
Ut m/s
Time of
Settling sec
Dn m
Rough
Weight Kg
n / Dn m
Correct Weight
Kg
1/ Dp m
RESULT:
Average size of the particle:
By differential analysis
By cumulative analysis
34
AIR ELUTRIATOR
EXPT.NO:08
DATE :
AIM :
To do the size analysis of a given sample and also to determine the average
size of the particle.
PROCEDURE:
i)
weigh about 2.5 gm of the sample and place it in the feed bottle
ii)
iii)
connect the sample bottles to the elutriation outlet and allow the air
to elutriate low velocity so that the difference in the mano metric
fluid becomes 0.4cm for about 10min.
iv)
weigh the bottle with powder and determine the actual weight of
powder collected.
v)
Repeat the above procedure for different air flow rates . such that
the difference in left hand and right hand side of the manometer in
0.8cm, 16cm, 3.2cm, 6.4cm respectively.
OBSERVATIONS:
Density of mano metric fluid (water) A =
Density of air
B =
Density of particle
S =
Pressure difference
P =
Expression factor
Y=
Diameter of Orifice
Area
35
(ds)
(A)
= ds2/4 =
Tube Diameter
(D1)
(A)
Tabulation 1
Sl.No
Manometer Readings
LHS
36
RHS
Weight of
empty bottle
Wo ( g )
Weight of
bottle sample
Ws ( g )
Weight of
sample Ws
Wo ( g )
Tabulation 2
Sl.No H
d
t
(m)
(m/s) (m)
x 10X 10
2
1/d
(m1
)
Weight
Wt (g)
Mass
fraction
d
weight
= -------------
Cumulative darg
Size
(m)
x10-5
d1+d2
d
darg
Total wt
H = LHS RHS
37
wt =
d=
d=
RESULT :
Thus the size analysis of given sample is done and size of the particle is
found out
d avg
(from graph) =
d avg =
38
LEAF FILTER
EXPT.NO:09
DATE
AIM:
To determine the specific cake resistance and filter medium resistance Rm using a
leaf filter.
THEORY:
Filtration is the removal of solid particle from slurry by passing it through a filter
medium on which solids are deposited and the filtrate allowed to pass through. The
deposited solid on the filter cloth from a packed bed and the filtrate flows through the
pores is assumed to be in the laminar range and Kozeny- Carman equation is used. It is a
batch filter and is used in the same manner as that of using vacuum. The specific cake
resistance and filter medium resistance Rm are calculated using the relations.
FORMULAE:
Rm
= w Vf /A(1-mw)
(m-1)
Where
39
Vf
= Area of filtration
OBSERVATION:
Weight of the watch glass
PROCEDURE:
2 liters of 4% slurry caco3 was prepared in the slurry tank and maintaining
homogenously using a stirrer. The filter leaf was submerged in to the slurry. The vaccum
pump is switched on and adjusted to the required value. The stop watch was started
immediately and time required for every 2cm rise in the filtrate level at filtrate collection
tank was noted. After filtration was over, a portion of the cake is taken in a dish and
weighed. The cake is dried and weighed again to determine weight of the cake. The
specific cake resistance and filter medium resistance Rm are then calculated using the
following equations.
40
TABULATION 1
Hm
41
t sec
V f m3
V m3
t/V Sec/m3
Vavg m3
RESULT:
42
Rm
BATCH SEDIMENTATION
EXPT.NO:10
DATE :
Aim:
To determine the minimum area of a Continuous Thickener required
concentrating a feed of 4% CaCO3 slurry at a rate of 150 tons / day of dry solids to give
an
underflow concentration of 50 % by carrying out the Batch Sedimentation.
Apparatus required:
Batch sedimentation setup, stop watch, calcium carbonate.
Theory:
Sedimentation is a separation process by which a dilute slurry is divided
into a clear liquid and a slurry of high solid concentration by settling. When the particles
are at sufficient distance from the boundaries of the container and from other particles, so
that it falls without being affected, then it is called hindered settling.
For low Reynolds number the drag force on the particle obeys Stokes law.
The law is valid at low velocities when the particle moves through the fluid by deforming
it. The wall shear is the result of viscous forces only. In gravitational settling g is
constant and drag increases with velocity, acceleration decreases with time and
approaches zero. The particle then reaches a constant velocity called the terminal
velocity.
It shows a newly prepared slurry having uniform concentration throughout
the cylinder. As the process begins, the particles settle down. Different zones of varying
conc. are shown in fig. Zone D consists of heavier faster settling particles, zone C is
called the transition layer consisting of variable size distribution and non uniform conc.
This layer presents are channels through which fluid rises upward and particles settle
down. Zone B is of uniform concentration. Zone A the topmost layer is of clear liquid. As
sedimentation progresses, zone A and D grow larger at the expense of Zone B. A point is
reached when Zone B and C disappear as critical point. At this stage, the solids present in
these layers splint out into the clear zone. When the force of compression is equal to the
weight of solid particles, then settling process stops.
Procedure:
1. Prepare a 4% CaCO3 slurry by taking exact amount of dry sample into a beaker.
2. Add a minimum amount of water and transfer the contents to a graduated
cylinder.
3. Make up the level by adding water up to the mark.
4. Stir the slurry constantly in a vertical manner until the concentration is uniform
throughout the cylinder.
5. Take out the stirrer and start the stop clock.
43
6. Note down the time for each centimeter traveled by the particles.
7. Measure the height by using a scale fixed to the side of the cylinder.
8. For about half the length, note the time for every one centimeter.
9. After which note down the time for every 0.5 cm. drop in the height of the bed.
10. Stop the experiment when the height of the bed reaches 4 cm.
Observations:
= _______ cm
= 0.04 g/cm3
= 0.50 g/cm3
L, mass flow rate of slurry = 150 x 106 / (24 x 3600) = 1736.1111 g/sec
Tabular Column: 1
Observation:
S.
No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
44
Height
Z (cm)
Time
(s)
S.
No.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
Height
Z
(cm)
Time
(s)
Formulae:
Note down tu from graph.
1. A, area of thickener =
tu L
CoZo
Graph:
Plot the following graphs;
(1). Z vs.
(the graph is in the format Y vs. X)
45
(cm2)
Result:
The minimum area of the continuous thickener for the given conditions, based on
the batch sedimentation data, was found to be ___________ cm2
46
47