Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
CICS-UBI Centro de Investigao em Cincias da Sade, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilh, Portugal
ITQB-UNL Instituto de Tecnologia Qumica e Biolgica, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Oeiras, Portugal
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 2 May 2011
Accepted 5 August 2011
Available online 12 August 2011
Keywords:
Gene therapy
Nanoparticles
p53 Tumor suppressor
Supercoiled plasmid DNA
a b s t r a c t
The translation of non-viral gene replacement therapies for cancer into clinical application is currently
hindered due to known issues associated with the effectiveness of plasmid DNA (pDNA) expression vectors
and the production of gene delivery vehicles. Herein we report an integrative approach established on the
synthesis of nanoparticulated carriers, in association with the supercoiled (sc) isoform purication of a p53
tumor suppressor encoding plasmid, to improve both delivery and transfection. An arginine-based
chromatographic matrix with specic recognition for the different topoisoforms was used to completely
isolate the biologically active sc pDNA. Our ndings showed that the sc topoisoform is recovered under mild
conditions with high purity and structural stability. In addition, to further enhance protection and transfection
efciency, the naked sc pDNA was encapsulated within chitosan nanoparticles by ionotropic gelation. The
mild conditions for particle synthesis used in the former technique allowed the attainment of a high
encapsulation efciency for sc pDNA (N 75%). Moreover, in vitro transfection experiments conrmed the
reinstatement of the p53 protein expression and most importantly, the sc pDNA transfected cells exhibited
the highest p53 expression levels when compared to other formulations. Overall, given the fact that sc pDNA
topoisoform indeed enhances transgene expression rates this approach might have a profound impact on the
development of a sustained nucleic acid-based therapy for cancer.
2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The development of novel cancer gene therapy approaches based
on the re-establishment of tumor suppressor regulated molecular
pathways is raising new prospects on the outcome of an effective anticancer therapy [1].
The p53 protein is a unique tumor suppressor, procient in the
selective induction of growth arrest and apoptosis in response to
oncogenic or damage signaling, acting as a prevailing guardian against
malignant cell transformation [2]. On the other hand, it is estimated
that the p53 gene is mutated or deleted in approximately 50% of all
human cancers and its ubiquitous loss of function contributes as one
of the underling events that trigger and sustain tumorigenesis [3]. It
becomes therefore reasonable that the reinstatement of the wild-type
p53 expression and consequent reactivation of its downstream
effector pathways has impact on cancer therapy, as recently reported
[4].
213
approach to recover sc pDNA for gene therapy [10]. Afnity chromatography supports based on immobilized amino acids possess unique
features since they take advantage of naturally occurring biological
interactions between DNA and specic amino acids, purifying biomolecules from the standpoint of their biological function or chemical
structure [10,11]. In addition, the intrinsic separation selectivity that
also occurs between pDNA and contaminants, render it a noteworthy
approach to purify plasmid biopharmaceuticals that comply with the
strict regulatory directives issued for gene-based therapies [10].
However, despite these major improvements regarding vector transfection efciency and safety, its delivery towards and into the
intracellular compartment still remains a key setback, since naked
pDNA is vulnerable to degradation (e.g. by serum nucleases and shear
forces) [8], is rapidly cleared from systemic circulation (sc pDNA plasma
half-life of 0.15 min) [12], and is rather inefcient in transposing
extracellular barriers and consequently in attaining therapeutic expression levels [13,14]. These limitations regarding intracellular access,
protection and bioavailability may be overcome if pDNA is packaged and
protected in nanocarriers that can selectively encapsulate and deliver it
in the cytoplasm [15].
Non-viral nanoparticulated carriers usually include cationic liposomes and cationic polymers such as chitosan [16]. Chitosan is a
biocompatible and biodegradable polymer [17], with a cationic charged
backbone that is responsible for its higher DNA loading capacity [16,18].
In fact, the charge density is its most important physicochemical feature,
since it allows the polymer backbone not only to complex with DNA but
also to instantly gel upon contact with oppositely charged crosslinkers
and surfactants [14,19]. Taking this into account, we recently reported
the synthesis of chitosan-pDNA loaded nanoparticles formulated by
gelation with a counter polyanionic crosslinker [20].
As schematized in Fig. 1, herein, we report the development of an
integrative approach that gathers the recent progresses regarding
purication and transfection efciency of plasmid biopharmaceuticals
and the novel generation of gene delivery vehicles, effectively covering
the key issues that currently hinder the translation of non-viral gene
therapy into clinical applications.
2.1. Materials
2.2. Methods
A general description of all of the used methodologies is provided
as following. Nevertheless, a more detailed description is made
available as supplementary material.
2.3. Plasmid biosynthesis and purication by afnity chromatography
Fig. 1. Schematics of an integrative approach for non-viral cancer gene therapy. (I.)
Purication of plasmid biopharmaceuticals and recovery of the sc pDNA topoisoform
using arginine afnity chromatography; (II.) Nanoparticle mediated delivery and
transfection; (III.) Expression of the p53 tumor suppressor.
GENE DELIVERY
GENE DELIVERY
214
215
Fig. 2. Selective separation of oc and sc topoisoforms by arginine afnity chromatography. (A) Chromatographic prole. Peak 1: weakly bound species; Peak 2: tightly
bound species. (B) Electrophoresis of peaked fractions. Lane MW: molecular weight
marker; Lane N: native pDNA sample. Lane 1: Peaked fraction 1; Lane 2: Peaked fraction
2. (C) Density analysis of the corresponding lanes in agarose gel electrophoresis.
support this conception, lane density was also determined, and as the
result in Fig. 2C depicts, the density peak indeed corresponds only to
the sc topoisoform, that is therefore recovered with maximum purity
and preserved structural characteristics.
GENE DELIVERY
GENE DELIVERY
216
Fig. 4. Encapsulation efciency of the nanoparticles obtained for the different pDNA
preparations; native pDNA, oc and sc. Each bar represents the mean s.d. (n = 3).
*P b 0.05, **P b 0.01.
Fig. 3. Characterization of nanoparticle morphology by SEM. (A) Nanoparticles
formulated with native pDNA (Scale bar 500 nm). (B) Nanoparticles formulated
with oc pDNA (Scale bar 500 nm). (C) Nanoparticles formulated with sc pDNA (Scale
bar 1 m).
The morphology of the different nanocarriers obtained is presented in Fig. 3. Nanoparticulated systems formulated from native and
oc pDNA preparations showed randomly shaped particles with
spherical, rod and oval-like morphologies as shown in Fig. 3A and B.
However, to address the possible inuence of the chitosan/ oc pDNA
ratio in particle morphology, different formulation ratios were also
investigated. Our ndings demonstrate that at higher ratios (5:1; 6:1)
the synthesized particles possess the same random morphological
characteristics, and at lower ratios no particles are formed under the
given formulation conditions (Supplementary Fig. S2). Whereas, the
nanoparticles obtained from the sc pDNA samples (Fig. 3C) demonstrated well dened spherical shapes.
Other relevant characteristics such as particle size, zeta potential,
and loading capacity were also determined for the different
formulations. As shown in Table 1, all of the nanocarriers demonstrated narrow size distribution with particle sizes suited for delivery
in tumoral microenvironments. Moreover, the chitosan nanoparticles
formulated with the different topological pDNA isoforms exhibit a
strong positive charge on their surface, an important feature that not
only inuences particlecell membrane interactions but also particle
colloidal stability.
Regarding the results of the loading efciency of the nanocarrier
systems it should also be pointed out that all the formulations yielded
particles comprised by a signicant content of genetic material (4458%)
when compared to the content of chitosanTPP (4256%), meaning that
the delivery vehicle not only upholds its important chitosan associated
features but is also formed by a considerable amount of the therapeutic
transgene. The ndings related with the process yield are similar for the
different formulations and in accordance with those reported in the
literature [22].
Table 1
Characterization of the different formulations of nanocarriers. Data is presented as the
mean s.d. .(n = 3).
Sample
Ratio
Particle size
DLS (nm)
Zeta
potential
(mV)
Particle loading
capacity (%)
Yield (%)
pDNA
(sc + oc)
Oc
Sc
4:1
157.6197.4
+ 20.24 18.17
51.18 6.71
26.54 4.29
251.3272.0
109.8162.5
+ 34.55 14.63
+ 22.6 4.94
41.44 0.51
42.80 2.54
21.42 0.33
20.93 1.24
Table 2
Characterization of the charge distribution of the different plasmid topological
isoforms.
Sample
Solution
16.4
7.31
9.33
217
Fig. 5. Cellular uptake of the nanocarrier systems formulated with different pDNA
topoisoforms. White bars represent cellular internalization after 2 h of transfection.
Black bars represent cellular internalization after 6 h of transfection.
Fig. 6. Immunouorescence and CLSM of A549 cells. (A, E) Nuclear staining with
Hoechst 33342 (blue); (B, F) FITC labeled sc pDNA (green); (C, G) Staining with AntiVE cadherin-Alexa 546 antibody (red); (D, H) Merged images; (I, J, K) MIP images of
chitosan/native pDNA mediated transfection at different time-frames, 2 h, 4 h and 6 h
respectively; (L, M, N) MIP images of chitosan/oc pDNA mediated transfection at
different time-frames, 2 h, 4 h and 6 h respectively; (O, P, Q) MIP images of chitosan/oc
pDNA mediated transfection at different time-frames, 2 h, 4 h and 6 h respectively.
White arrows indicate FITCpDNA.
Fig. 7. Flow cytometry analysis of the reinstatement of p53 expression in A549 cells. (A,
D) Half overlay histograms of the re-establishment of p53 with the different pDNA
topological isoforms; (B, E) Mean uorescence intensity (MFI) values of p53 labeled
Alexa 647; (C, F) P53 relative expression mediated by the different pDNA topoisoforms
with either nanoparticles and Lipofectamine, respectively.
GENE DELIVERY
GENE DELIVERY
218
Fig. 8. P53 tumor suppressor mediated apoptosis in HeLa cells induced by different
pDNA topoisoforms. Representative dot plots of Annexin VFITC (x-axis)/PI (y-axis)
double staining of (A) Untransfected cells (control); (B) Cells transfected with native
pDNA. (C) Cells transfected with oc pDNA. (D) Cells transfected with sc pDNA. (E)
Percentage of apoptotic/late apoptotic HeLa cells.
Fig. 9. MTS cytotoxicity index of the nanoparticles formulated with the different pDNA
topoisoforms, native, oc, sc, blank nanoparticles (without pDNA) in: (A) HeLa
malignant cells. (B) Rat skin broblasts. White bars represent cell viability at 24 h.
Black bars represent cell viability at 72 h. Non-transfected cells were used as negative
controls for cytotoxicity (K). Ethanol treated cells were used as positive controls for
cytotoxicity (K+).
219
GENE DELIVERY
GENE DELIVERY
220
formulations. Taking also into account the occurrence of favorable crossinteractions between sc pDNA and polycations, it is important to point
out that these interactions are responsible for the maintenance of sc
isoform structural stability after its encapsulation in the nanocarriers
systems when an excessive amount of positive charges from the
polymer are present, as reported by Bronich et al., 2000, [38]. In our
particular case since the synthesis of chitosan/pDNA nanoparticles is
accomplished in positive overcharging conditions, thermodynamic
stabilization of the sc topological conformation upon complexation is
therefore promoted [38].
Regarding the cellular uptake of the different nanoparticle formulations the results obtained are in accordance both with the EE and the
morphological characteristics of the different carriers. Particularly, sc
pDNA nanoparticles exhibited slightly higher cellular internalization
(Fig. 5). This fact is likely a consequence of the combination of the
physicochemical characteristics of the sc pDNA synthesized nanoparticles, since particle size, zeta potential and morphology markedly
inuence the overall particle uptake [39].
The encapsulation capacity of the nanoparticulated systems is also
emphasized in Fig. 6 since the amount of uorescently labeled pDNA
that reaches the intracellular compartment is superior when chitosan
based nanoparticulated systems are employed as delivery vehicles, in
detriment of cationic lipid-based nanocarriers. In fact as previously
reported, chitosan is able to condense higher amounts of pDNA than
cationic lipids [14]. All the results shown in Fig. 6 not only further
evidence that the nanocarriers formulated with the different topological
isoforms efciently transpose the extracellular and intracellular barriers
but also that the transport of the genetic material does not affect the
carrier transfection capacity. Actually, our group recently reported that
chitosan-based delivery systems also protect pDNA from the deleterious
action of DNA degrading enzymes present in serum, this is an important
feature since as mentioned earlier, the material must upkeep its
structural stability [20]. Upon intracellular localization the genetic
material is expected to follow the routes depicted in the schematics in
Fig. 1. In fact, as the MIP reconstruction images at different time-frames
depict, initially the pDNA is internalized in cell vesicles (Fig. 6I, O)
Afterwards since vesicle disruption is promoted by the nanocarrier
systems (proton sponge effect) the pDNA is localized in the cytoplasm
and then the intracellular trafcking to the nuclear periphery is initiated
(Fig. 6J and P), a transport that is thought to be essentially controlled by
microtubules [40]. Finally the genetic material is then shuttled into the
nucleus by the cell endogenous import machinery [41], (Fig. 6Q) where
it will ultimately be expressed. However, it is important to denote that
the intracellular transit of the oc pDNA /chitosan particles is relatively
slower than that of the native or sc, a fact clearly noticeable at 6 h where
these particles are still localized in the cytoplasm, whilst the sc pDNA
nanoparticles are extensively localized in the nucleus and the native
pDNA nanoparticles in the perinuclear space. These ndings may
partially explain the increased biological activity of the sc pDNA
formulation due to the fact that the kinetics of gene expression may
be different among the studied formulations.
Altogether, as the results of Fig. 7 demonstrate, p53 gene expression
is indeed re-established in malignant cells. As illustrated by Fig. 7C and F,
higher p53 protein levels are attained with sc pDNA mediated
transfection either in nanoparticulated or liposome transfected cells,
in comparison to other topologies. It should also be emphasized that
despite transfection levels of nanoparticles and Lipofectamine 2000 are
comparable, the slightly higher levels of protein expression obtained
for liposome transfected cells might be correlated with the differences
in pDNA vector unpacking properties of the nanocarriers at these
transfection times [32]. Taking this into account, it is also essential to
point out that Lipofectamine mediates transient transfection, whilst, the
transgene expression promoted by chitosan nanoparticles can achieve
quantiable protein levels in an extended time-frame as recently
reported [19], thus, rendering it a more powerful and valuable approach
for a future p53 cancer-based therapy. In accordance with our p53 sc
221
[8] S.G.L. Quaak, J.H.v. den Berg, K. Oosterhuis, J.H. Beijnen, J.B.A.G. Haanen, B. Nuijen,
DNA tattoo vaccination: effect on plasmid purity and transfection efciency of
different topoisoforms, J. Control. Release 139 (2009) 153159.
[9] F. Sousa, D. Prazeres, J. Queiroz, Improvement of transfection efciency by using
supercoiled plasmid DNA puried with arginine afnity chromatography, J. Gene
Med. 11 (2009) 7988.
[10] F. Sousa, D. Prazeres, J. Queiroz, Binding and elution strategy for improved
performance of arginine afnity chromatography in supercoiled plasmid DNA
purication, Biomed. Chromatogr. 23 (2009) 160165.
[11] A. Cheng, W. Chen, C. Fuhrmann, A. Frankel, Recognition of nucleic acid bases and
base-pairs by hydrogen bonding to amino acid side-chains, J. Mol. Biol. 327 (2003)
781796.
[12] Z. Parra-Guilln, G. Gonzlez-Aseguinolaza, P. Berraondo, I. Trocniz, Gene
therapy: a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling overview, Pharm. Res.
(2010) 14871497.
[13] Y. Seow, M. Wood, Biological gene delivery vehicles: beyond viral vectors, Mol.
Ther. 17 (2009) 767777.
[14] R. Jayakumar, K.P. Chennazhi, R.A.A. Muzzarelli, H. Tamura, S.V. Nair, N.
Selvamurugan, Chitosan conjugated DNA nanoparticles in gene therapy, Carbohydr. Polym. 79 (2010) 18.
[15] M. Davis, Nanoparticle therapeutics: an emerging treatment modality for cancer,
Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 7 (2008) 771782.
[16] S. Mao, W. Sun, T. Kissel, Chitosan-based formulations for delivery of DNA and
siRNA, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 62 (2009) 1227.
[17] M. Ribeiro, A. Espiga, D. Silva, P. Baptista, J. Henriques, C. Ferreira, J. Silva, J. Borges,
E. Pires, P. Chaves, Development of a new chitosan hydrogel for wound dressing,
Wound Repair Regen. 17 (2009) 817824.
[18] M. Jean, F. Smaoui, M. Lavertu, S. Mthot, L. Bouhdoud, M. Buschmann, A.
Merzouki, Chitosanplasmid nanoparticle formulations for IM and SC delivery of
recombinant FGF-2 and PDGF-BB or generation of antibodies, Gene Ther. 16
(2009) 10971110.
[19] N. Csaba, M. Kping-Hggrd, M. Alonso, Ionically crosslinked chitosan/
tripolyphosphate nanoparticles for oligonucleotide and plasmid DNA delivery,
Int. J. Pharm. 382 (2009) 205214.
[20] V.M. Gaspar, F. Sousa, J.A. Queiroz, I.J. Correia, Formulation of chitosantpppDNA
nanocapsules for gene therapy applications, Nanotechnology 22 (2011) 015101.
[21] T. Ishii, Y. Okahata, T. Sato, Facile preparation of a uorescence-labeled plasmid,
Chem. Lett. 29 (2000) 386387.
[22] A. Krauland, M. Alonso, Chitosan/cyclodextrin nanoparticles as macromolecular
drug delivery system, Int. J. Pharm. 340 (2007) 134142.
[23] S. Kagawa, J. Gu, S.G. Swisher, L. Ji, J.A. Roth, D. Lai, L.C. Stephens, B. Fang,
Antitumor effect of adenovirus-mediated Bax gene transfer on p53-sensitive and
p53-resistant cancer lines, Cancer Res. 60 (2000) 1157.
[24] E. Komlodi-Pasztor, S. Trostel, D. Sackett, M. Poruchynsky, T. Fojo, Impaired p53
binding to importin: a novel mechanism of cytoplasmic sequestration identied
in oxaliplatin-resistant cells, Oncogene 28 (2009) 31113120.
[25] N. Luscombe, R. Laskowski, J. Thornton, Amino acidbase interactions: a threedimensional analysis of proteinDNA interactions at an atomic level, Nucleic
Acids Res. 29 (2001) 2860.
[26] F. Sousa, T. Matos, D. Prazeres, J. Queiroz, Specic recognition of supercoiled
plasmid DNA in arginine afnity chromatography, Anal. Biochem. 372 (2008)
432434.
[27] A. Sousa, F. Sousa, J. Queiroz, Selectivity of arginine chromatography in promoting
different interactions using synthetic oligonucleotides as model, J. Sep. Sci. 32
(2009) 16651672.
[28] Y. Cai, S. Rodriguez, R. Rameswaran, R. Draghia-Akli, R.J. Juba Jr., H. Hebel,
Production of pharmaceutical-grade plasmids at high concentration and high
supercoiled percentage, Vaccine 28 (2010) 20462052.
[29] J.S. Blum, W.M. Saltzman, High loading efciency and tunable release of plasmid
DNA encapsulated in submicron particles fabricated from PLGA conjugated with
poly-L-lysine, J. Control. Release 129 (2008) 6672.
[30] D. Dunlap, A. Maggi, M. Soria, L. Monaco, Nanoscopic structure of DNA condensed
for gene delivery, Nucleic Acids Res. 25 (1997) 3095.
[31] B. Chithrani, W. Chan, Elucidating the mechanism of cellular uptake and removal
of protein-coated gold nanoparticles of different sizes and shapes, Nano Lett. 7
(2007) 15421550.
[32] E. Gullotti, Y. Yeo, Extracellularly activated nanocarriers: a new paradigm of
tumor targeted drug delivery, Mol. Pharm. 6 (2009) 10411051.
[33] S.D. Perrault, C. Walkey, T. Jennings, H.C. Fischer, W.C.W. Chan, Mediating tumor
targeting efciency of nanoparticles through design, Nano Lett. 9 (2009)
19091915.
[34] M. Morille, C. Passirani, A. Vonarbourg, A. Clavreul, J. Benoit, Progress in
developing cationic vectors for non-viral systemic gene therapy against cancer,
Biomaterials 29 (2008) 34773496.
[35] N. Turro, J. Barton, D. ToMALIA, Molecular recognition and chemistry in restricted
reaction spaces. Photophysics and photoinduced electron transfer on the surfaces
of micelles, dendrimers, and DNA, Acc. Chem. Res. 24 (1991) 332340.
[36] G.S. Manning, The molecular theory of polyelectrolyte solutions with applications
to the electrostatic properties of polynucleotides, Q. Rev. Biophys. 11 (1978)
179246.
[37] T.K. Bronich, H.K. Nguyen, A. Eisenberg, A.V. Kabanov, Recognition of DNA
topology in reactions between plasmid DNA and cationic copolymers, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 122 (2000) 83398343.
[38] B.A. Lobo, S.A. Rogers, S. Choosakoonkriang, J.G. Smith, G. Koe, C.R. Middaugh,
Differential scanning calorimetric studies of the thermal stability of plasmid DNA
complexed with cationic lipids and polymers, J. Pharm. Sci. 91 (2002) 454466.
GENE DELIVERY
GENE DELIVERY
222
[41] A. Lam, D. Dean, Progress and prospects: nuclear import of nonviral vectors, Gene
Ther. 17 (2010) 439447.
[42] G. Chandok, K. Kapoor, R. Brick, J. Sidorova, M. Krasilnikova, A distinct rst
replication cycle of DNA introduced in mammalian cells, Nucleic Acids Res.
(2010).