Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
th
Humanity has advanced, when it has advanced, not because it has been sober, responsible, and cautious,
but because it has been playful, rebellious, and immature.
Tom Robbins (1936 - ) 2
Sometimes he must go alone.
And wait for the World to follow.
Me
The aim of the current document, is to briefly lay down and attempt to explain our current state of understanding of the phenomenon
of autoignition, as a prelude to the presentation of our most recent advances in this field and how they relate to the existing knowledge
base. I have made it so brief in fact, that at the end you will be undoubtedly begging for more. No self-respecting scientist in this field
likes to admit that there is a to a lesser or greater degree pyromaniac in us all. At least to customs. And definitely no serious
autoignition scientist likes to refer to his trade as the study of explosions. At all. But, thats what it is. So, join me in this journey
into the exciting field of explosions.
In the three sections below, progressively more complex autoignition cases are presented and analyzed. The insight gained in each
of the more elementary situations are valuable tools for the understanding of the more sophisticated ones, although as we shall see, in
this field, just as it is with so many areas of scientific interest, it is always dangerous to extrapolate results and conclusions outside the
bounds within which they were reached. The fourth and final section contains our latest observations and the if I may be allowed
state of the art in this field, at least as we see it here.
1
the reaction, and the overall thermodynamic process, which will determine what happens to this heat and how the conditions of the
mixture in the container will be affected. This interplay between heat losses from the system to its environment and temperature rise is
a key concept in autoignition. Great interest has developed not only focusing on the conditions under which explosive reactions occur,
but also, in the rates and mechanisms of steady reactions during which most of the known pollutants form in zones of steady, usually
lower temperature reactions.
We return now to our bomb and delve into the theoretical situation of a simultaneous explosion due to the global characteristics
of the premixed mixture. The propagation of the reaction zone will not be an issue for two reasons. Firstly, because we set the mixture
pressure and temperature to be inside the flammability limits and secondly, because we only really care about the events leading up to
the event of explosion/ignition. On the other hand, the effects of the walls of the container are very important, since they affect the heat
transfer out of the system. Let myself, explain ... myself? It is not sufficient to consider the initial conditions of the mixture. Even if
the mixture is not initially explosive and the fast chemistry of explosions does not exist, the mixture can be brought within the explosive
limits. As long as fuel and oxidizer are simultaneously present, there will be a finite although very slow reaction occurring in the
container. The chemical energy contained in the reactant molecule bonds is greater than that contained in the product molecule bonds
and the progress of the exothermic reactions inevitably leads to both heat release, and consequently, temperature rise. With the help
of the heat released and the particular characteristics of the system, the explosive conditions may be reached. Yet, due to the coupling
between the heat release and the temperature in the container, nothing can be said of either of these two quantities, unless the nature
of the overall thermodynamic process is known.
(1)
Throughout this analysis a one-step, second order global reaction is considered. Thus, from chemical kinetics the reaction rate is given
by:
Eact.
A%2 YF YO Eact.
d[F]
= Ae RT [F][O] = w F =
e RT
dt
M WO
(2)
where [F] is the fuel concentration, A the Arrhenius Pre-exponential Factor, Eact. the Molar Activation Energy, R the Universal Gas
Constant, w F the fuel reaction rate, M WO the molecular weight of the fuel and % the density of the mixture.
We now consider the process in more detail. We assume unity Lewis number, Le = %cp D = 1 and so %D = cp , where is
the molecular conductivity of the mixture, cp the heat capacity at constant pressure and D the Fickian coefficient of mass diffusivity.
Initially, T0 is low and the chemistry is slow but finite. This slow exothermic reaction will release heat. Since the system is insulated,
the thermodynamic process is adiabatic and the heat will be retained causing the temperature to rise slightly. This causes the reaction
rate to increase. Thus, an unstable feedback mechanism is set-up, in which the temperature and reaction rate increase by mutually
promoting each other. Eventually fully-fledged combustion breaks out. This self-acceleration of autoignition is termed thermal runaway.
Even though the consumption of reactants leads to a reduction in reaction rate as described by Equation (2), the explosive increase
due to the increasing temperature in the exponential term more than compensates for this. Finally, as the reactants approach complete
consumption, the reaction can no longer be sustained, the mass fractions take over and the rate decreases to zero. Since there are no
spatial variables, there is no diffusion or convection and the governing equation for energy is reduced to:
Q A%2 YF YO Eact.
T
=
e RT
t
c p M WO
(3)
Scp T
Q
D
h
i
=
%D(
)
Dt
xj
xj
(4)
WO
where, S = M
. Note the absence of a source term, hence the non-reactive or conserved. From the aforementioned considerations
M WF
of the conserved scalars and for a premixed system there are no spatial variations in (Equation 4) so that:
= 0 = = constant
t
(5)
which implies that must have the same value for both the reactants and the products, in which case:
YF = Y0F
cp
(T T0 )
Q
YO = Y0O ro S
cp
(T T0 )
Q
(6)
(7)
We may say, that the solution of all equations of the form of (Equation 4) is a unique function of the initial and boundary conditions,
and not of the degree of reaction. Substituting these results into (Equation 3) results in:
ih
i Eact.
Q A%2 h F cp
T
cp
=
Y0 (T T0 ) Y0O ro S (T T0 ) e RT
t
c p M WO
Q
Q
(8)
It is relatively straightforward to solve (Equation 8) numerically, yet in order to gain some insight we shall make a slight approximation.
Prior to autoignition, the chemical time scales are large, the temperature is still low so that the rate of change of species is negligible.
Mathematically, YF
= Y0F , YO
= Y0O and %
= %0 . The essence of this problem lies in the exponential term with the temperature
dependence and this is kept. For our system, up to the point of autoignition, we have:
Q A%20 Y0F Y0O Eact.
T
=
e RT
t
c p M WO
(9)
A common linearizing manipulation of the exponential term, for which the essential assumption is that the temperature rise before
ignition is small, e
Eact.
RT
Eact.
RT0
Eact. (T T0 )
RT02
h
i1
act.
Q A%20 Y0F Y0O Eact. ERT
RT02
0 t
e
ln 1
T = T0 +
Eact.
c p M WO
RT02
(10)
h
i
E
act.
act.
Q A%20 Y0F Y0O 1 RT02 ERT
2 (T T0 )
e 0 1 e RT0
c p M WO
Eact.
(11)
.
w
T0
.
w0
Tadiab.
ign.
Figure 1: Temperature prior to Autoignition of Premixed, Stagnant Mixture without Heat Losses
Tf
A subtle point is that in (Figure 1) the temperature will actually level out at the adiabatic flame temperature. And, now we can
define ign. as the Autoignition Delay Time. This can be defined in many ways. For this theoretical problem we can define it as
the time at which the temperature becomes infinite, i.e. the asymptote in (Figure 1):
ign. =
act.
Q A%20 Y0F Y0O 1 RT02 ERT
e 0
c p M WO
Eact.
(12)
(13)
Figure 3: Heat Generation and Loss Terms for Autoignition of Premixed, Stagnant Mixture with Heat Losses
The r.h.s has two terms. The first one, G, is the same as before and describes the non-linear generation of heat due to the chemical
reaction, whereas the additional term, L, is for the linear convective heat losses at the container walls, with A the inside area of the
container, V its volume and hsurf. the convective surface heat transfer coefficient. Figure (3) demonstrates the various solutions of
(Equation 3).
High heat losses L (Curve L1) and G3:
Point A is a stable solution; heat generation and loss balance and thermal runaway does not occur. The vessel keeps
reacting, at very low rate, yet the heat of the reaction is lost as soon as it is generated. Autoignition does not occur,
dT
= 0 = T = TA
= T0 .
dt
Point B is an unstable solution. For a small deviation away from this point and to the left, the system will move back to A,
due to the fact L is greater than the G. A perturbation to the right, will cause autoignition, due to the fact G is now greater
than the L. The heat that is generated cannot be removed in its entirety and the feedback mechanism of the autoignition
process is set-up in the same way as with the no-heat losses case.
Curves L1 and G2 are mutually tangential at point C and show the critical condition. Autoignition will always occur, only for this
case with respect to B it occurs at a lower temperature and is thus considered as the actual autoignition condition.
For very low heat losses (Curve L2), G is always larger than L. Autoignition will always occur.
The behaviour of the system changes. With high heat losses, autoignition can be completely avoided. With low heat losses autoignition
is possible. This is a key autoignition feature. Successful combustion is possible only if the heat loss is not excessive. This concept is
extremely important in the qualitative understanding of combustion. All combustion technologies, one way or another, are built around
an exploitation of the balance between heat generation and heat loss.
Now try Batch Reactor with the GRI-Mech calculator at http://diesel.me.berkeley.edu/ gri mech/cal22/. It is a good place to
start because you can try blowing up ok, igniting various mixtures and see what will happen. The applet actually solves the more
generalized species and temperature equations for a closed vessel filled with natural gas and air, i.e.:
Y
DY
= w +
%D
Dt
xj
xj
h
Dho
p
uj
uk i
T
%
=
+
+
uk +
Dt
t xj
xk xj
xj xj
(14)
(15)
residence time
res.
chem.
chemical time scale
(16)
Figure (4), with the sharp rise indicating thermal runaway at the autoignition time t = ign. is characteristic of autoignition. The
lower left hand side of the curve corresponds to the slowly reacting state prior to autoignition, when the short residence times, res. , are
much smaller than the large times of slow chemistry. This prevents autoignition. As the chemistry becomes faster or the residence time
increases, so does Da until the autoignition point is reached. For Da values greater than this have fully fledged combustion. Chemical
reactions that take place at the high temperatures are nearly always fast compared to all turbulent time scales, whereas at the low
temperatures of very low Da, the chemistry is very slow relative to the turbulence. In both these cases, the length and time scales of
the chemistry and turbulence may be separated. This is the region of operation for most engineering combustion processes that classical
combustion models are based on. However, in the regime just prior to ignition the chemical time scales are of the same order as those
of the chemistry and the scale separation assumption is no longer valid.
The autoignition of laminar non-premixed counterflow Li
nan, Seiser et al and co-flow Li
nan and Crespo mixing layers, is described
theoretically by activation energy asymptotics.
Y
2 Y w
=D 2 +
x
x
%
(17)
and involves only two time scales; one from the chemistry and one from the fluid-mechanics.
Autoignition will only occur if the mixing rate is below a critical value, ign. increasing as the mixing rate increases. This molecular
mixing of the fuel and oxidizer is quantified by the scalar dissipation rate, , or the strain rate of the counterflow velocity field. Theory
and numerical simulations have indicated, that indeed, autoignition is not possible for < crit. . An expression for has been proposed
a + s 2[erf c1 (2)]2
e
(18)
For the counter-flow diffusion configuration Da can be related to the inverse of the scalar dissipation rate at stoichiometric conditions via
1
dif f.
stoic.
= chem.
. Hence, the S-shaped dependence of maximum diffusion flame temperature as a function of the
the diffusive time, Da = chem.
inverse dissipation rate at stoichiometric conditions 1
stoic. , shows the quenching and possible autoignition dependence on this important
parameter on the overall process. Experiments with CO, H2 and C7 H16 have validated this finding for laminar flows. This result has
important implications for the effects of turbulence. Taken at face value, this result would mean that in a CI engine, autoignition would
occur later if the mixing rate is increased and possibly not at all. Of course, we know from experiments that high turbulence intensities
and smaller spatial scales, as associated with faster mixing, in fact results in earlier autoignition. It is a textbook case of not being able
to extrapolate knowledge from laminar to turbulent flows. In this configuration the mixing layer thickness will increase with time due to
thermal diffusion. Mathematically, this is an initial value problem, and will always result in autoignition [Li
nan and Crespo, 1973]. The
autoignition time, ign. , depends on the chemistry, the initial temperatures in the fuel and air streams, T0F and T0O and mass fractions,
Y0F and Y0O .
In turbulent autoignition DNS studies, the autoignition spot is more rigorously defined by examining the local heat release, or the
so-called reactedness field and not the temperature, at locations of a certain mixture fraction = M R . They are collectively called
iso-surfaces. The reactedness is defined as the temperature increment from initial conditions, conditioned on some value of the mixture
fraction and can be non-dimensionalized,
b = h(T | = ) (T0 | = )i
B=
h(T | = M R ) (T0 | = M R )i
h(T | = ) (T0 | = )i
= Bauto. =
Tadiab.
Tadiab.
(19)
(20)
where Tadiab. = Q
is the temperature increase due to reaction in a stoichiometric adiabatic flame. The most important DNS finding,
cp
for isotropic, homogeneous decaying two-dimensional turbulence in a shear-less mixing layer and a simple chemistry model, came from
Mastorakos et al. According to this work,
1. Autoignition always occurs at a well defined mixture fraction M R , defined as the most reactive mixture fraction. At any instant,
there are many such possible locations in the mixture. In fact, iso M R lines (this is a two-dimensional domain) can be drawn in
the field and can be predetermined by the laminar flow analysis of Li
nan and Crespo, i.e. effectively by the chemistry.
2. The fluid particle that will eventually autoignite, is the one with small gradients of the mixture fraction , i.e. experienced a low
value of conditional scalar dissipation rate, h| = i. Plots of Bauto. and h| = M R i have been demonstrated to be very well
correlated as far as the first autoignition location is concerned.
Since then, evidence to support these findings has come from simulations with different codes Sreedhara and Lakshmisha and with
detailed chemical mechanisms for H2 and a quite reliable four-step reduced mechanism for C7 H16 . Recently, an extension has been
made to three-dimensional simulations Sreedhara and Lakshmisha for proper hydrocarbon chemistry, fully validating the earlier results.
Additional features revealed by these simulations include:
1. Vortical structures are more prone to autoignition than strained layers. It is believed that the well-mixed vortex cores, with uniform
vorticity, temperature and concentration thus associated with much lower , trap heat released by the pre-ignition reactions
and have much less heat losses Thevenin and Candel. Also, at least in the two-dimensional flow fields, autoignition spots are likely
to be small-scale vortex cores and not small-scale diffusion layers Mastorakos et al.
2. The fluctuations of the mixing rate h00 | = i are important for autoignition, possibly because regions of steep gradients lead to
increased local heat losses, reduced temperatures and much slower reaction rates (recall the exponential Arrhenius dependence on
temperature).
These points have significant modelling inferences. It might be, that the consideration of the means of the mixing rate is insufficient. A
point is being reached, where we are just beginning to be able to reasonably predict the location of autoignition, but these predictions
can only be confirmed by experiment.
The effect of the turbulence character, length and time scales on the magnitude and randomness of ign. is far from understood
and these are exactly the questions this project aims to answer. For the purposes of the current study, the exploration of autoignition
sensitivity to the aforementioned parameters, is best attempted in conditions in which the chemical time scales are of the same order, or
close to the order, of the fluid-mechanical time scales. The direct effect of turbulent mixing is most significant for the non-uniformities
of non-premixed autoignition, but the effect of partial premixing is something that is also very interesting to examine.
Overall, there is currently very little data available concerning the effect of the local turbulence character on autoignition. It is
only recently, with the increase in residence times res. and consequently Da associated with the low emission LPP industrial turbines,
that this issue has become relevant. Appropriate work has been done by Mizutani et al. and Mizutani and Takada in this direction,
although the second paper is concerned with liquid fuel sprays. They conclude that autoignition delay times are notably increased by
strong turbulence. Yet there are still many questions that need to be addressed. The primary focus of these studies are the conditions
for which autoignition is possible. The topology (location and spread) and time evolution of the autoignition sites, or autoignition spots,
with specific reference to turbulence has not been addressed. The experimental database of turbulent autoignition needs to be vastly
improved.