Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
262
ARMOR PIERCING BULLETS
I. Leeder
..--
7-1
. . - 7
*.
.
:::,;
. . . ,.- .; .. ..
. . , ,. '
-.
. ~.
. -:I
..,.
r -..'-......
.. ,. . ,
?
J . : ] .
,.-:-
.-
- . . -,.
November 1941
.-.,.>/
.)/.
0;
Page
B.
INTRODUCTION
.........
...........................
.................
IN TESTS ....................
C.
'
5
5
6
7
E. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
II
..............................
.......................
.....
...................................
........................
1 Introduction
2 Arrangement of Data
3 Table 111. Quantitative Presentation
of D a t a
(4) Use of the Navy F Formula for Analyzing
Results, Table 111
(5) Average Performance of Bullets Against
1/2" Face-Hardened Plate
(6) Arrangement of Data from First Series
of Tests
(7) Average Penetrating Efficiencies of Carbide
and Standard Bullets as Determined from
All Available Data
..................
..................................
........................
F-1.
10
11
11
12
13
13
14
.................................
........
...........
..................
.....................
.................................
..... .......
.-
TABLE OF COMTENTS
Page
DISCUSSION OF BALLISTIC RESULTS
F-1.
FACE-HARDEXEB PLATE
, NORMAL IMPACT
................................
F-11.
19
...e..{...eeoe-t
. . . . .. . . . . . .
..............
..............
...........
...
....
of Illustractions
Plate, Normal Impact
Plate, Oblique Impact
Plate, Normal Impact
Plate, Normal Impact
(5-a) Comparison of Results of Carbide
Bullets against Face-Hardened and
Hon;ogeneous.Plate
(5-b) Dissipation of Energy by a
Projecti1e.thatShatters
(5-c) Correlation of Ballistic fcesults
for Carbide Bullets with Fragment
Recovery
1/2" Face-Hardened Plate, Oblique Impact
Correlation of Ballistie Results and
Fragment Recovery with Physical Properties
of? Carbide Bullet Cores
...........-.....
........
.........................
B.
..................
ANALYSIS OF DIFFE;liEl\iCES IN R3SULTS AD DET?3RMINH)
FROM TrARi4Yv AND llIAVYllBALLISTIC LIJdIITS .........
..........
....
...
....
35
35
35
36
FIRINGS.
....
....
...
37
37
38
TABLE OF CONTEIJTS
Page
CONCLUSIONS
.........................................
RECO>GJlENDATIONS
39
l.....O..u....u...e..e.
39
..ee.......
TABLES
Table I.
Table 11.
Table 111.
........................
Detailed F i r i n g Data and Notes on
Recovery ..............................
B a l l i s t i c Data f o r Carbide and Standard
A . P. B u l l e t s against Face-Hardened
Plate
.................................
Table 111.
41
84
A. P. B u l l e t s against Homogeneous
Plate
Table IV.
40
...................................
'.
91
...............................
Table V .
...............................
96
APPENDIX A TO TABLES.
Table 111-3.
........................
Table IT-B.
GRAPHS
...............................
..............................................
PHOTOGRAPHS
........o...........O........O...........
98
102
105
114
'.
,'
i
i.2
,*
.. -
i'
..
.#jsb.
'
W
O
R PIERCIEG BULLETS
-_
Abstract
It appears t h a t t h e s u p e r i o r i t y of the carbide bull6ts against facehardened p l a t e i s mainly a t t r i b u t a b l e t o t h e fact t h a t the carbide cores
tend t o remain i n t a c t while the atandard s h a t t e r during t h e process of
penetretion. Against homogeneous p l a t e a t norinal i a p c t where t h e f a c t o r
ef core failure did not play any r o l e , t h e e f f i c i e n c i e s of the carbide and
etandard bullet cores were i d e n t i c a l . At o b l i q u i t i e s , however the carbide
bulbeta* performance became progressively inferior t o t h a t of the standard.
m e sharp t r a n s i t i o n i n t h e o b l i q u i t y behavior of the carbide bulleta
a g a i n s t both face-hardened and hamogeneous p l a t e - i a associsted with the
relative weaknees of these hard sintered materials t o transverse impact, a l l
cores tending t o s h a t t e r o r pulverize although still.retainiag s u f f i c i e n t
toughness t o surpass t h e standard bullet cores a t anglea up t o 30 against
face-hardened plate.
. .
..
--
.
A
-
.- ..
L
,
nC
'
-.
B. JNTRODUCTION
\
-.
\
In general the properties of the cobalt grades are somewhat higher than the corresponding quantities for the nickel
grades, with the exception of the specific gravities which are
practically the same over the entire range of binder.
.. .+. .
C.
, .
'
.
v .
.,
Hardness,,Rockwell C:
- .. Rockwell A:
Compressive Strength, p.s. I. '. *
ModtiL~sof
'Elasticity, p.s.i.;i,. ,,:
'
61-------------- 65
81.5------------- a4
3~,000-----3&0,000
. 29
.
+ X lo6
.
/ 4
3.
.
.. ,.._I
. '
. .
..'
!
.,
..
C.
..,'
R PLATE m
U
P
lE
D IN TESTS OF SPECUL CeflBIDE
-Thick
Manuf'acturer
=S'
.
Number
Back 4d6
444
Second
Dieston
1/2"
Disston
12
Face
-
Disston
555
578
.555
555
'
'
555
5 5
555
.:
:;:*
,
Mebold
375. .
.: .
Diebold
344:
4l5'
555
.
-: .
W729,
. .
1/2s
hrnegie Ill.
' 154590
a.
Heat
15353
(for obll
First
First
not g i v a ,
.
First
First
..<! ..3&7&
g+:,~
Second
Second
401
555 - 364
555 .. 375
5/8"
388
Remarks
Second
388'. .
601
601
1081
W5
115
388.,'::.:
555
'f8h
Heat
112"
Test
Series
P4EE-t
D i s ston
Brine11 Hardness
3/8"
Plate
291
Heat
-3 . 1140
/. A
-
% .
3U
Second
321
Second
1/2"
Msston
1 , Aea t
u 7
.
5/8m
Carnegie X l l .
tesfr a t
at 3
8'')
Heat
174947-3
f .
Notes
(Ior some
obliqpity'
17503
258
Second
#+
B. -YEITAL
!ECHNIOUE.
METHOD OF TESf
The quantitative basis of cornparison of all bullets
involved the determinations of limiting velocities. For t h i s
the routine procedure of the Small Arms Section was followed.
. .
Em J9CPERIlIIENTAL RESULTS
a*
The extent and emphasis of the experimental program i s
QP
ammua;ltion:
rhg@ke Type
Ir,
.-
Bo.
of
Plates
_Caliber
Caliber
i/Zn
$/8"
FJi*
FeB.
Normal
20O
:,
30
.
.3'0 Bullets
80
11
'Caliber
..
- -30 Bullets
9
.
._-
of
' ~ ~ h ePlate
s
-
'
Number of rounds'fired at
.50 Bullets
F.H. = Face-Hardened
Horn. = Homogeneous
In order to simplify the presentation and discussion, ballistic data, results of recovery, and other information derived from tests.of varying thicknesses and types
of plates are generally separated by inclusion in different
sections although all are interrelated parts of apparently
a fairly simple, coherent pattern of behavior. By this
necessary process of artificial selection and division into
components, their degree of dependence, as well as the aspect
of the whole is not continually present or always fully
apparent in the report; just as a jig saw puzzle requires the
interlocking of numerous sections to create a unified whole,
before the correct relationship of the numerous individual
members can become more firmly established.
Arrangement of Data
.
- .
Although the actual f i r i n g results and notes on
recovery are given in Firing Record No. 22883, A619, the
data therin have been rearranged somewhat for more convenient
presentation, and with the inclusion of a slight amount of
additional information are presented in Table 11. The data
of the continuation of the same test program on l/bn facehardened and 1/21t homogeneous plates at 30 obliquity, and
a 5/8n homogeneous plate at normal are also embodied in
Table 11. The detailed results of this table in so far as
limfting velocities are concerned-aresummarized for the
individual grades in Table 111 along with,the calculated
energy values corresponding to.the striking velocity, for
both the core and bullet, and the F values for the core
which are considered more fully later.
2,
3.
xable I=' %
I)
4.
'w
F = 2.013
tt/Pd
COS*
where
5..
6.
F a
- I-
1.
I
I
I
I
(Lb)
_____
-----
___
!
..
-.:
+.--
. --.-..--.
.
'
.....j&. ..
"*
_____
.
"-,-.r..__.-
P vr?lus (for
$&
@f
p e q ~ i r e dapproximately 20% more energy than the latter, which
-i s- a s & g W i c a n t amount.
. . .
'
.__.
.. .
..
i d e r a t i o n of Results of I n i t i a l
C~ns10eringthe f i r s t s e r i e s of t e s t s , the F
the carbide cores with nickel binder a r e not
sggpificagtly different from those f o r the cores w i t h cobalt
as-Pindjng element. The one sample with 9% iron a s binder had
wi!?experimental limits p r a c t i c a l l y the same F value as
$he cobalt
nickek types with t h e same percentage of binder.
This f a c t in eonjumtion with the f a i U y cioae agreement between
%he piekel.and c ~ b s b %s e r i e s would indicate that the exactI
I
nafure of $he binding constituent i s of secondary importance
so fap as %he pene%rating properties of the s t r a i g h t
8 ~ g s t e ncarbide cores at normal impact are concerned. Morepepcentage of binder up t o about 20% does not
ever, $he
~ p p e a r$0 be ef consequence for penetration k t normal. Those
@6&~s&t&ons
with 25% binder were clearly inferior in perf oraance
and tbwef ope are not discussed f u r t h e r .
values f o r
$he
gugyed approximately ~ 5 %
less-energy t o penetrate the given
@pmqr pl&e than the standard .30 H2, A.P. core. A s mentioned
pleeviousLy, ealculatierls based upon the cores of b u l l e t s are
.- -
lr.r.
I
I
I
I
- c.
1.
,'
. .
. .
. ..
'
..
'
,.
'"
'
.--.
'
'
...,.
1i
,.
1n the second series o f ' t e s t s , l / 4 n and 3/8"-facehardened plates were investigated, grade 1774 (9 N i - 9 1 wC) being employed against the former, snd grade 1830 (13 Ni-87 WC)
against t h e l a t t e r . The superior performance of the carbide
bullets against these p l a t e s mas even more marked than against
the 1 1 2 ~face-hardened. For t h e 114" thickness a low enough
velocity could not be readily attained t o give a p a r t i a l
penetration and therefore enable the determination of a
b a l l i s t i c l i m i t . With this p l a t e , from Table V, the F value
f o r the carbide core was less than .6 t h a t of t h e standard,
and the carbide core required l e s s than .4 of the energy of
the standard core f o r complete penetration.
3
--
- ...
-.-..----
'
5.
:>-:.
.,
'
' :
"
'
5.
'
:.
. . .
. .<.
..
F.
- 11. - DISCOSSIO1J
OF 3ALLI;TIC RZBULTS'
FACE-HARDENXD PLATE. OBLIGUE IFPACT
CALIBE3 -30 BULLETS
(19)
..
-- - - -
------
--
-__--_._
_-
'.
1.
~/d*
ace-~ardened p l a t e . O b l i c u i t v
Perf ornance
,
lo
Presentation of I l l u s t r a t i o n s
.* -- 1 -
I n t h e second s e r i e s of t e s t s particula'r e f f o r t s
were d i r e c t e d toward the recovery of b u l l e t fragments and p l a t e
punchings, t h e means u t i l i z e d having -been discussed i n t h e
s e c t i o n on Experimental Apparatus. The d e t a i l e d observations
on t h e recovery a r e noted i n Table I1 wherein t h e amount of
p r o j e c t i l e core recovered i n t a c t from t h e base o r nose section
i s i n d i c a t e d i n appropriate columns. dome r e p r e s e n t a t i v e photographs of t h e r e s u l t s of t h e recovery program, and t h e types
of holes produced by both t h e carbide and standard cores a r e
presented i n the P l a t e Series, P 1 P 22, the i l l u s t r a t i o n s
for fragment recovery and armor p l a t e corresponding generally
t o t h e same rounds. The notation accompanying each f l l u s t r a t i a n
has been made complete for a ready a p p r a i s a l and convenience
i n reference t o Table 11. The f i g u r e s a r e numbered consecutively
f o r each thickness and type of p l a t e . Complete p e n e t r a t i o n s
are shown from the f a c e and back views of the armor p l a t e .
The b u l l e t frzgments have been segregated according a s t o whether
they were recovered i n t h e f r o n t recovery drum from t h e
f a c e of t h e plate, or i n t h e r e a r drum from the back of t h e
p l a t e , with no e f f o r t made t o s e p a r a t e jacket or p l a t e material
from that of the b u l l e t cores. A l l i l l u s t r a t i o n s of armor
p l a t e and fragments a r e approximately a c t u a l size; i n t h e case of
the armor p l a t e s e r i e s , some v z r i a t i o n s i n the s c a l e e x f s t and
i n a d d i t i o n because of the d i s t o r t i o n present i n t h e p i c t u r e s
(areas of armor p l a t e mere photographed on 8" x 10" film and
t h e r e s u l t i n g p r i n t s c u t up f o r t h e individual i l l u s t r ~ t i o n s )
accurate measurements a r e not f e a s i b l e .
2.
f/ln
Face-Hardened P l a t e . Normal I m ~ a c t
P
Standard, Rd, 4
/Outline
of core t i 1
W g s t e n Carbide, Rdo 7
\i
.
3.
L/d" Face-Hardened
.
. . .
plate':
.
. .
0bliaue
....
lrn~acf
(i
4-
_'
.,
Sketches of ~ u n c h i n g sf r o s Carbide
and Standmd A - P . Caliber - 3 0 B u l l e t s
3/8" F.H. P l a t e
Standard, Rd. 5
5.
t);
-
'
Round 23, P l a t e I
- (a)
- a.
~oi~arison
of ~ e s u l t sof Chrbide Bullats against
Face-Hsrdened
and Hoaoeeneous Plate
. . .
.
Further evidence of *n indirect nature i s available concerning the action of the carbide bullets against '
face-hardened plate from the dependence of the average F values
of the caliber -30 bullet cores as a function of thickness,
Plot No. 3; the averalre values for the standard bullets-against
the same face-hardened pltte being also included for comparison.
Anticipating the results for homogeneous plate, it lnay be mentionec
that under these coilditions where the tro;lblesomecircum~t~~nces
of cope failure were pr~cticallyentirely absent for all bullets,
the penetrating efficiencies, or F values, for a11 the carbide
and standwd bullet cores were identical. On'Plot No. 3 the
F values for a series of homogeneo~sp l z t e s of high and low
Brine11 hardnesses have been denoted in t&e dotted lines to
obtain representL4tivelimits of perforsance', the data being.
taken froin the set of comprehensive firings of Carnegie Illinois,
embodied in Firing Record Mo. 20702, A301, January 6 - 21, 19.41.
In asmuch as the F v@ues for the carbide and stzndard cores
are the same against homogeneous plate, the indication from
Plot Ito, 4 is t b t from a qualitative and even semi-qusntitative
aspect the ballistic behavior of the carbide bullet cores
against face-hardened plate approximates,thatof either the
standzrd or carbide cores against homogeneous plate, Also
for additiorlal corrobor;tion, the.'average F value for the
caliber -50 tun sten carbide bullet cores fired against 1" face= 55t200 from Table IV-B) closely approximntes
hardened plate
that obtained with standard caliber -50 cores against hard
homogeneous plate. These results seem indeed reasonable:
that face-hhrdened plate of good quality, with a face brdened
layer that will not spall, shoilld so act in penetration by
bullets that remain intact roughly the same a s if it were
homogeneous plate of the szme analysis and hardness as that
of the body proper; takfng into account the fact that in the
fsce-hardened plate the face layers are so hard as to be inferior
to the body of the plate with respect to ballistic resistance.
6,-
.-
.-
'
5,
- b.
D i s s i ~ 2 t i o nof Energy bv a P r o j e c t i l e t h a t S h a t t e r s
1
"
A l l t h e a v s i l a b l e experimentti1 evidence i n d i c a t e s
then t h a t t h e appreciable d i f f e r e n c e i n penetr>.ting e f f i c i e n c i e s
of t h e standard and carbide b u l l e t cores agtdnst f ace-hardened
p l a t e i s a t t r i b u t a b l e t o t h e basic f a c t o r of preazture core
f a i l u r e i n t h e a c t i o n of the stsndard. That s e c t i o n a l d e n s i t y
probably does n b t play a r o l e , a s might be r e a d i l y assumed, may
be i n f e r r e d from the r e s i f i t s f o r the complex carbide grade, 1835
with the sase weight of core a s t h e standard.
5.
- c.
(28)
The penetrating e f f i c i e n c i e s f o r t h e c o b a l t s e r i e s
follow re&sorxibly c l o s e l y the s t a t e o f - t h e recovered cores,
the compositions with 13 and 205 c o b a l t , which possessed the
l o x e s t F values of a l l cbrbide cores, having a l a r g e f r a c t i o n
of an average core remaining i n t a c t ( t h e core found completely
i n t a c t was froiq..the 20% grade). The punchings f r o n t h e above
series and t h e i n t e r n a l penetrations of the core appeared
well formed with no abnormal f e a t u r e s . S i m i l z r l y no serious
discrepancies & r e found i n the o t h e r f i r i n g s except those f o r
the 13% n i c k e l grade and the conplex grade, 1835 both of which
had a r a t h e r high F values ~ i i t ha normal amount of i n t ~ c t
recovery, A possible explanation f o r these i s advanced on t h e
indicative f e s t u r e s of t h e i r punchings, the i n t e r n a l
penetrations i n both cases showing 20 ox l a r g e r yaw from the
normal to what corresponds t o the r e a r surface of the armor
plate, as i n the accoapanying.sketches.
.:
. . . . .. . . .. .
. .
. .
; ketches
-.
'
. -.
. . .
'
\*
of
Core
Penetration
Grade 1830A, 1 3 % ~ ~
Round 5 5 9 Plate V
J.kn
Face-Hardened P l a t e . Obliaue Impact
Size ole,
vaiue
Grade
Punchinq
Illustrations
Armor P l a t e
55 ~ ( 1 3 c o )
3.774 ( 9 ~ i )
'
Punching
Fig. P l a t\ \
60,600
small
.14
20
19.
66,000
v e r y . small
16
23
20
78,300
large
12,13
7,8
18,19
19
1 8 3 0(13Ni)
~
83,500
large
17
21
20
18316(2011),
85,300
large
Results f ~ Which
r
relations hi^ Does N o t H ~ l d
1695(6Ni)
76,600
5 5 (20Co)
~
67,700
'
small
16
'9
22
f a i r l y large
15
21
..
20
20
[--.
->
<-
'7-
(31)
- ---
'
.;. . .'
-c,
':?,?;.
I......
1.
8,
PROM "@MYir
'L",
In sections concerning the ballistic r e s h t s ' o n lacehardened plates at normal Lrpace, the analysis centered on the
efficiencies of penetration based upon lliiiting velocfties
determined in accordance with the A r m y criterion of a complete
penetration, and the question a r i s e s as to what degree'would
the comparison of the bullets have to be modified were the
Navy criterion of complete penet~ationemployed. From Table, 111,
tho data bearing on the relationship between t h e nArmyv and
"Navy" results have been outlined below. Some results for
obliquity firings are also included where this was found incideLtally in the course of the investigations, no particular effort
being directed toward this end In view of the difficulty experfenced i n determining Navy limiting velocities at obliquities
when projectiLes break up ox- ahetter.- .
-.
. I
s,
COMPARTTSPNNNOFRESULTS DETERMINED
FRO* A-RMY AND FJAVY CRITERIA
OF COMPLETE PEIJ~TRBTIOIJ (fro% Table 111)
-DEPJED
PLATE
Grade
Angle
"Am@ Wit
nAnayn... ': F$aoy- V?ply
FNary-FAnny
e%
Veloeity
F
f/a
2 ;:.
~bliquity
$/a
,J ,.;.
Qickness 1 / 4 ~
..I
e:
'
L>
1 - --- -
8tanda4.d
1774
--
2ll9
78200
949
)47j00
87
(gertial)
Standard
,lS..'. . .
1
T
a53
3400
>17500
>349
%. .
72000
( 33)
.'F.
-.
*A?'
For the 1/4n plate the data are too meager to warrant
any conclusions other than that the large differences for the
carbide grade can possibly be attributed to the effect of the
jacket at these low velocities. In the 1/2" thickness both
"ArmyH and "Navy" results are experimentally .identical for
I
the standard bullets and two of the carbide type; for the
I
remaining carbide bullets, the greatest difference between
I
tihe W A r m y n and WNavyn F values was on the order of 1 6 and
I
the average about 6%. The explanation for the generally
close agreemeat, identical in many instances, in striking velocities required for an nArmya or nMavyn complete penetration
against face-hardened plate, (in contrast to that against homogeneous) is readily apparent from the examinations of the armor I
plate and punchings. In obtaining an 1IArmy" complete penetration 1
with a standard bullet, a cylindrical slug of greater diameter
I
than t h e bullet core (due to breaking up of the core) is exI
I
pelled from the plate thuS leaving a hole through which'the
core material can pass to make also a "Navyn complete penetration. I
With respect to the carbide grade bullets, the character of the
1
p>unchings, showing t h e internal penetrations of the cores, was
discussed in some detail in pages 24-25
Numerous examples
of punchings (some of them illustrated, but not with sufficient
clarity in the photographs) were found in which the carbide
core had penetrated just to the rear surface, thus making a p i n
I
hole in the back of the armor plate and therefore an "Army"
I
complete penetration before the punching was sheared from the
plate. The cores of the carbide bullets, however, were hindered
somewhat in passing through the armor plate after the punching
.by possibly forces of a restraining and destructive nature:
the armor plate in the immediate vicinity of the entrance hole
is constricted by elastic reaction about the bullet core and
therefore additional work, which should be slight, is required
to complete passage through the armor plate due to the frictional I
forces; furthermore, if the bullet strikes with slight additional I
yaw, the core may be broken by the bending forces encountered
at the sides of the restricted entrance hole, thus accounting
for the large nmber of sections from the base found in front of
the plate. The circmstances affecting the course of the above
actions are complex and unpredictable, the data given furnishing
an indication as to the limits in behavior that may be expected.
.,+
~ A L I ~ E.30
R FIRINGS,
___
_ ___ H0;lfOGEiJEOUS
_
I__-_C__-__
--.
PULTE
In order to obtazn an rulalysls of the r e l a t i v e performance oP the carbide gnd standsrd cores under conditions wherein
core Pw3.lure would p l a y r a t t l e Z f any r o l e , and thereby t h a t
the W l u e n c e of section~J.density and possibly other f a c t o r s
*1
,.
The b/2"ea\sgengous
p l a t e sellected f o r t e s t was of
medium BrL4elL hardness, 3.4-I, Two carbide grades were i n v e s t i gated, 1774 (~NI-~Iwc),and 1833 ( 1 5 ~ 0 - 3 9 ~ 1 ~ - 4 6t~h~e )former
,
befng among the densest of tbe carbide core materials tested,
density 34.57, and the L a t t e r among the lightest, having approximately the same d e n s i t y as that of the standard A.P. core stock.
The results iR Table IT1 g h ~ w~ e n c l u s i v e l ythat well within the
3.
.l
. . .
J.
1.
1/2" ~omo~eneous
P l a t e , Normal Impact
---
2.
J/8n
process of penetration.
CONCLUSIONS
The superior penetrating efficiency of the carbide
bullets azainst face-hardened armor plate is due to the
important feature that in the process of penetration, the
carbide bullet cores tend .to remain intact,.whereas the
standard tend to shatter initially. These results corroborate
the well known fact that in face-hardened plate, the primary
purpose of the face-hardened layer is to shatter an armor
piercing projectile in the initial stages of impact; and that
when It fails to perform this task, 'theresulting ballistic
resistance of.the -plateis inferior
.
.to that of best quality
homogeneous armor,
. .
. .
,
reasonable.
Apart from the economic factors involved, carbide bullets
for practical use suffer at the present time severe limitations
that are associated with their relative Geakness to transverse
impact. Thus, for use against aircraft, I n which application
the airplane skin or covering customarily imparts an appreciable
yaw to the perforating bullets, these carbide bullets would
probably be unsuitable in view of the poor penetrations that
could be expected from them with large striking yaws.
RECOMMENDATIONS
If the advantages to be gained from the characteristic.
behavior of carbide bullets against face-hardened plate prove
to be of importance for any specific applications, further
experimentation on practical and academic grounds would be
warranted on other metallic carbides and intermetallic compolads that might be economically preferable to tungsten-carbide.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The author wishes to express his appreciation of the
criticisms and suggestions offered by Mr. Kent and Mr. Tolch
In the preparation of this report.
TABLEI.
\
2.
Comp. %
'
..
..
Hardness
.,
...
....
-,
-.
.. . . ., .
. ... ... .
-.
.
. '. >.
.
. . . . .
. . ..'..._
"...
..
. _--.>
...I...-. : '
.-,...
, ..
WC
- .
.'CO
-.-
...
Strength Modulus
Comp. of
glas ti. . .
. . . .. .
: -
Trans.
'
.
.
, ..
:
i
Specific
.Gravity
..
.:
.
- ... -., .. .
-.. . . .
-
- R0ck.A ,:.
_ .-
.%
. ..
.....
'
.<
..
m8
.:xloa :rlo6
. . . . .. .
.
..
,
'-
'p-.-s'.i.;
p.s.2.C . .
. ,
.'.: city
F .
- .
. .
:_. . . . .
.
p.s.i.
. . . . .
\ .. .
. . .
;.
..
.,
,..
. .
'r. +
7%
.,
'
i ,
: T a b l e 11.
.I
::
._..
'.,!,
'.
.,L
\..
P.
C.
.
.
..
'.. . .
.
.
i'
..
..
..
'
(7
:
.,
-...*
"
.
.',
\\
..; .!
.,,.:,"i':t.
. :...-:
. . . .>.
y
.'
; rp : .
"
'~i&etbr~.&netration
..
. ,Punchingstarted
Slight bilge,
..
Medium bulge '.., '
,
Large bulge
. orei in plate
1,
~ i a s e dthrough
plate
.: I
'.
.:
. ..
'
.....
.
.
'
..
t:
-.
'
Intact
Face spa11
......
.... .(.. - . . . . . .. . .
.
;.
. T'
. .
. .
- *
'
. ., . .. .
,.
. . .
.,: '
2
.;.c5;<.
':
. . . .
..
..I
~ k .t..i a(penstrkt
l
ion)
.< #
,
A.
. . . *.
_.
,.:;
..
... . . . .
'
. . .
m eS i
s. B.' :;'
M. B.
L. .B.
C0I.P.
P.T.P.
int
F. S.
.& ,
E m ~ l o y i d 7 . ' :.
Dia. Pen.
.....
List of ~bbre$iati&s
_ ..
.
. .
> .
..
.
,
.. :
'
. .
,.
.. .
. .
:
I...
=.
->
_ .
..
.-
I
1. Under "Results on Platen, the diameters of the penetrations
at the face and back of the armor plate are entered in the appro1
priate columns. To conserve space, any additional remarks concerning the results on the armor plate are made i n the same columns
Estimated values of yaw refer to the yaw of the proJectile hole
in the armor plate.
.'
:*,
7
'
li
4
. .
. . .,.
:j..'
'
._
..
+ ; a
. -... .
:*
,,
~
.,..
,.w*>-
;
"
!;
. . .
,
.
"
,' II
I
.C_
&[
- . :.'
. . .
<'
..C
.. ... .: '.. . .
. .:.. ... . .
. _ . .'>' ,. -:
*
...
..
:,
....
. e . .:..: .. .
i..:
, .
-:,. ...
.
.,
.\
.,<
, '.;-;
..-.,. <
+.,-
>,), .... . f
'., ......
,,.,
\ I
.v
,.
.. r .
.$
\:
.
.a:".
. . . .
,-.*
3,:
.
1
.
.
. .. . .
. '
"' . .
,.. .:
.2:
> .
'
,.
' .. . r
.,
'3
,
'
' _ _ 7.
\'
'7
,.
.;
.. . " 4:," . :
y
..
; .
. . L ' ~
'.
'
;..
. . ;.;. . . . . .. . .
. . .
:
.
. .
. . .
.. : .- . .;,. .-- . .. . . .
,,..:::
.:
'.
3 ' '. . . >
.
*. .
:
, . - 2 ,
. ... '. . .. . . .
,
,
. "C
..... .
. . . . ., ' '?; .'.', :.' . " " &. - * .
. . ...,
..
,-2 ; , . .+ .?- di.4
. ._>
.
1
:
. .. . . ..'.<
. .
. . - ..+. :.
', -1
.. .. . .
:,
.,,.,
.
.
.
.
, .
. +.
.
I.
.
..:.t,,,,
. .. . . ., .. .. . .. . . .. . . .
t.
",.?
' . :.
'
. . :
. . ; . . . . .
.....
. .
' . . . .:
. ' . . ... r . ..h . , :
, .
f
. . .
. . .
.
.. .:...
r - , < - . .
,., . . .. . . . . . . .I . . . . . . . . . .
., .
.;
. ., ' " . .
.
,
..........
' .
. . .
. ..!...
,'.
. ,.
.,
*.
. :;
.. .. ' . . . .,*. .
. . .
8 ' .
'
....
:.$.%:
. . . .'. ..
.
.
.-
...
,
,
. . . . . . - 3.1
.,
.. .
' . ... . .. . :.: . .<, . . . . . '
. .. . . . . . . . .
.
. *;;.
r. .-.*.
. . .6.. . " 5 , , ,. :
. .,.., > ,I
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...
,!. B ?
y ..: ..*..._ . ..
+, :.:.*'
... . 7
'i;.;
.!..*\':
:. .:
:I
*-
.
,
.
.
~:i
.'
... .. . . . . _
. .,. .. < .
! : . . .. ..
,...
.
:*
..
.. . . - .., .. .. .: . .
. . ......
.: .... . . ,.. ...
..
;Q
. .
. . .. . . * - .> -
"
I . .
..
. . . '. . ,; . .'. . ..
. .-.
,.
.: ':
;4
t.
. .
i : . ,
,
,,
..
-.
.
I.
'.,
'
'
::.
:;<
..
,."..<,
;
1
8,
. ..;: .
..
- :,:: .fi%.;::.<
.
I
.....
. .. :. !.
..
.
.
-. . " ' ,
,
'C'
-. .\ ' .
..-
:-,
'
,
'I.
. '
Table I1
iiuta1li.d
E ' i ~ ~ i l ~Prlta
,;
iCn.:-i
--
;!ul l c t
. . r : ie
--
--
>.,;)rt: '..t.
'7
1.G.
,.
--
,.;!
'
I:
. .. .
l
-.
.-
- .-- ..
..
-.
"tanda?d
30M2
i.1
:.; !
l t
I ].! :.
k'l.:J-i--~;ti
le
..-
I/.!,"
16
(-~:~it-.
011 Fl t i ?
..-. -- . -- - -- --- --- - . .
:.. -- L i . L i* ' e n .
(:
--.c:k
- .--- . ..
.
L:
tj
--
' e
. J
( L C .~ t ' & )
C.
r ~ coi:t;ll.l~er
t
and then
F.
Voor rec:overy.
ed ~ n a t e r i a l
17
2110
j
2 j ~ j
u.
( l;!ent bhru f r o n t
l/4"~1,/4~
I
1/41'x5/161
c o n t a i n e r . i ~ L!len
~ i :l:itii
F. Poor r e k o v ~ r y , pulve-.rized m a t e r i a l .
B.
.-.
la
21;"
fl
23 14-2
.-
C.
,1//+"~5/161
B.
19
20
I1
.,. .... .
. -.
1774
( old
lot)
_.____.-_
"
2355
20
? -7;h-s
?\)O
1 1'.)9
i l e d i 71 bulge
Pu1veri:sed mat-:!riil
I/A" i n k .
Few s!na:.l fraznents
cornplcty punching
. .- .
#
.
Dul le t
iinri.
---..
-
e
-
Cora
-- - .. - -
'.it.
.-
,
.- -.
779
--.-.
-.-.-.-.*
.(:I'
--.,
-.
Tccns:!l.t
-.- - - .
1\11
"
----.
l e ..
t-'r~?-L;--l:ti
-- . - S C
h i c k . 1/2",
flavy
1748
cd
779
5.
235
1.482
C.1.P-
779
233.5
lb22*
C.1.P
F.
1/2"xc)/16fr
B.
Pun. $.
Pun.
-.
I I
- .,-
-.-. .
..-,.I
-:--5 1. -
, fIeut 1081,
234.5
. !.'(;n.
;'- I~L.: . -1
..
'.
.
it.
Jacket n , a t e r i a l rind
few fragments
/ 8 1 1 i n t 3/8l1 int.
l a r g e pt.$nching
m e in
in p l a t
. 9/16" i n t ,
-I .
- -Bullet
.,rs,ie
Sore
'.+t
--
--1 .
ii~.
1.
----
-. i . e s u l t
..Q.
55A
12
011
1!il:1ji.
l'.,c{
~ i l t o nF. H. blr
o.
231.
i:,
Heat lb81.
Navy
C
R r b s u l-t
Plate
&I* Pen.
I
" ,ck
h hick. 1/zV
on P r o j e c t i l e *
,\zse
Kose
"
fdnt'd.)
F.
cd . 4/16nx1/2"
Small a. ount of
ed material
1/2" i n t .
t punching
230.5
1662** Navy
on
boat
-c d.. '1/16nx7/16"
tail
2-
1663**
base
55A
15
3 on
boat
tail
228.5
1535*
C.I.;>.
1/4"1cl/2~
F.
C.I.1'.
cd.
-
ments. Paptial
plehlni$.
1/4"x5/16".
TIP 5
I
16
55A
4on
230.5
1462
F, Destro d
boat
tail
%/I&
int.
4
Depth Pen. = l / 4 n
55s
17
50x1
boat
tail
232.5
1460
1/2" int.
I
drum.
18
55A
6on
lboat
232.
I(
19
1464
11
C.I.P,
I -Large
.. I bulge
- -
I.."
I1 '*
Y- - 1 5
Em?
1'.
Rnd.
- .
l
l
19
plate
-
boat
tail
C.1
,P.
Large bulge
gun. ptarted
I
55A
20
3 on
boat
tail
230
1509"
22
23
' 55B
55B
55B
+
+
destro
5/8"
tnt.
21
sligh'. bulge
F.
Yaw a 3out 15.
Depth Pen. =7/161
2X
225e5
226.5
223 5
1741
1736** Navy
1673**
cd.
1/2"x1/2"
cd.
''/16nx1/2~
F.
B.
1/2" i n t .
B.
Punchinq
C.I.s?e
F.
9/16N
int.
1/2"x1/2"
24
55B
223 5
1568
C.1.P
F.
Table I1
I
Detailed
26
5 5B
I 55B
224
221.5
Di.im.ot' Pen.
-,
r-,ce I
.tck
-l
2
*t/
P.
15909
C.I.P.,
F u n . S.
---
-__I_--
Result on P r o j e c t i l e
i k s u l -t on - Y1;lte
Xn~le
of
Crns.
Obli (1
Dls$ton F..-.M
25
j'il*ir~;:
1623*
C.I.P.,
Nose
Ease
(cont'd.)
F.
3/4ft int.
F.
Fragment
Punching
=I774
(new
lot)
13
237 5
1637
28
1774
(new
lot)
14
236
1771**
Pulveriz#d
l a r g e yaw.
F.
F.
B.
7/16'! i n t .
Several
'
;?:gent
Punching
~~
29
1774
: (new
15
236
1713
1/4ttx
lot)
- /lbtf
F.
9/16" i n t .
16
30
C.I.P.,
237 5
3/lbn
f ragmentb.
Punching#
1/2" int. i r
plate
3/8t1x7/16t1,
B.
Hose i n t
1/2n i n t .
.3?.d
- ..
Lul_.l&
'L:
- - ,,
x,.,1-t;
..o.
1774
(new
lot)
31
17
'
',
GI~XIS
--. - .- - - .
-- -- - -- - - -.l i i a ~ ; ~-on
l t.- .Pro
. -C
) ~---~ t i l
- .- .
..
.
11
l i e ~ t1.1~1. ~ h i k k . I/,"'
(~Jnt'd.)
i I i t w r o d on yaw
frame
F.
3/81fx1/211 B.
34
1/21f i n t
T i p no$e
punc h i d &
remainder
5/16" t n t .
' standadd
20
2954
F.
20
2956
F.
. 3 0,412
33
'3se
?lose
rl
32
' Standard
.30 A M 2
Standard
. 3 OM2
20
3150"*
P
both
n.
~ulverjzed.
Om
Pulveri.zed.
One
fragmer,t ~--1/8'~
f ral;rnet,t
Sli[;hl; bulge
---1/8"
and
M.
35
Navy
Standard
.30Ff2
7/1611xr'/1611
7/1611x7/16
36
Standard
.30W
2S0
F.
c
A and
N.
7/16"x1/2'
E3.
Fair ahount of
;nater ia:.
--
__
;,rl. Le
of
.- -
---.
I h l - le t
C::re
',;t.
!. 0
r..J
4 on
231.
. . r 'e
.l
..~
.-
i:t,
_ --
IX .
Result
. ..i.
l>i.Ll~.
..
3blS.i.
I I S
.*
1hel.
~ h ~ 1/2"
k .
1783
20
1~54*
C .I .,?.
20
18609
C.I.'P
20
'
-~rojrct~le
$ase
Nose
?::ck
sz
~is~toF
1.1 11. 3late Nu. 1 . Heat
55A
37
cf 2en.
-, Cc?
011
( C :nttd.)
F.
Broke i : ? t o small
base
39
55A
5 on
base
231.
55A
4 on
233.
boat
tail
i/4ffx5{16fl
( H i t ~n iron
I
40
55A
1on
boat
tail
231.
20
1929
. .,.* ?-
Little C.I.P.,
SOB. :? 0 .*
amount
Pulverized
,a
.. . !.-'
, i C.
'*
.--J
..- * . ..---. -
-,
"'
..IC
. <,-&$
.-* * ..r.
..
.
.
. -?.
.- . -
::"
41
5 5
9 on
base
232
20
1924
C.I.P,
F.
1/4nx5/16~
3/8n noee
$nt. in
Efikcitr
I
3/16" W:.
'
55B
223
20
2010
F,
-1.
ZL. J
>.-.
'-
.. .
,.::.
g
:. .::.+
-,'7:..?
. .; -\
- ... .'-.;
*
=
.
. - .,
C.*. .
', *..-7d
1 - -.--.-
c.. -" 1
: + .
42
m e r i s e 1 *:2. -4,*.
.
',.
,--1?
..,i
,;
*:4.
.*
--r.
..'t.
?-:.
:<,
?.a
. '.2.-"
.d
Grade
1774
(new
Wlllot
Core
Vt..G
Ank!le
of
r,esult on P l a t e
Diam. of Pen.
Ctrik.
Vel.
Result on Projeotilo
18
lot)
6
1774
(new
lot)
19
235.5
30
253W
5/1bnx7/16 F.
I I i t recovery drum
20
237
30
2489
22
238
30
2536*
I
1
P.
S.B.
Pa
S.B.
Depth ?en.=l/8n
B.
~ u l v e r i z b dnutorialPulverlz sd uuterial.
Punching
. Pulver ed
F . Pulverize i
F
ie
10
'
1774
23
234.5
30"
2574
P.
24
236.5
20
2035*
Depth Pen.=3/lbtr
F.
Pulve~lzei
F. Shattered material.
por t i 0 1 1 f :ont
punching
(1
Table XI
'irld
tJot,es on HecovePy
--
-------
Result o n r o j e c t i l e
iieault on P l r 4 t e
1830-A
230.5
20
2345
Nose
Butt-
()ontld.)
P,
F.
Hit
Shatter
on edge
previcus round
21
11830-A
20
2397
P.
F.
Pulverized.
portions F. S.
233
20
2648
P.
F.
1/aUfi
glmost
6hat tereh-ti*
-*.
---
20
2566*
1,
234 o
231.3
.'
-.
._
II
--
A
.
--I.
Table I1
Table I1
_ _ . _ _
Fzd.
3ul l e t
I rrade
Core
r 0
.1
I
37
38
J ' ~ I I ,le
of
CIbliG.
N.
10
1695
241 5
- .- --
2044
- .. - -
..esult
011
- .- .
.-.
1081..
hi&.
Pa
C.L.Y.,,
both
A. and N.
---
--
ilr.s~ll
Prokctile
-- - -t-- on --
Plt:te
h k - T F e---n-i
:'&lck--
Hdiit
2708++
N.
1::~.
-_.
2t.1-ik.
------.
:'.lse
Nose
1/2~1 ~[mt'd.
Pun. S.
1/811 into
I?.
Shatterel*
Y.
Navy
C.
M o s t l y Jncket
m;xterlal
3/8t1x3/811
11
241.5
N.
1840
Navy
C.
..
F. S .J l/;L"'x9/16' F.
Cd .
-
3/8"7/16
'
gent of
Pnt.,
int
Remainder, broken.
Yunchinq <Franments
!+
Table I1
Rnd.
----
Grsde
Etllk.
Core
Veb.
1774
(old
lot)
51
237 5
N.
1644*
----
1774
(old
lot)
11
235.5
N.
1'711H
*-
__I:
C.
Cd.
----
51ni;ll
1774
(old
lot)
12
238.5
N.
1692
E'
7/1bt1x1/2t1
ci
9/16'' int.
fiema i n d ~ a r ,jacket
rndteris..
1/21' 111%.
E'.s .=)/8t1~3/4t1 F.
7/1bt1x7/
Cd.
C.
!/1Lnx7/1
U.
53
----
h e s u l t on P r o 2 c t h l e
~,
C.
Cd.
-
52
i.rsult - y l ~
~ 1 . to
1
DILN.
of
Pen.
*
race
1
7;ck
D.
3/8" i n t .
l/L+llL e e t .
neq2rti;?.
int
7 / 1 ~ ' ~ x l i Punching
2~
Table II
Table I1
i l e t a i l e d Yirir~):Data
,111'1
i4~t;c.sf)n ilecovery
Table I1
T a b l e 11
I
h d
Bullet
.lride
Anklle
.L* Q .
--
Ctrik.
--
',it.
Core
(;I'I~s,
------
1835
lb8
N.
2399w
72
1835
N.
167
----,
2472
. 2
Result on Projectile
C.
--
I',esult on P l a t e
Diam. of Pen.
72ce 1
3ack
u s E toil&
71
Cd.
-
7/161tx1/2
Cd ,
-
3/8nx1/2"
C.
73
1835
N.
166
2670
P.
S.B.
F.
Projecti:.e broke
up and p q v e r i z e d
-
1835
74
14
169
N. :
2597
C.
C.1.P
8" int
II
Table I1
a
a
Q,
+,
+J
3
--
Q,
k
0
0
4
s!
QIIO
0
9
G4
Q,
Q,
I
I
I
3
&
*8
-
P)
Y
M
OI
>r
2
5
::
,,
-Q)
T
u'
cY
W
**
i
0,
Qlk
PZ!
J
do
c-
*
al
b
0
*a-?'ah b
CCcl+,
r(#
rd
PcOO
4-4
+)
E O O
4-4
Ld
r.3
40
LC
+r
Table I1
Rnd
Grade
.
Hornoj?bneous - 3rInellr 321
~ e a k17505.
1830
1830
10
1830
13
N.
232.5
1668+
P.
?.
Hose
TI
*-
C.I.Yv
M.B.
,*
Result on Projeotile
~ t , l . i k . ~Ceeult on P l a t e
Didm. of Pen.
Face I
3nck
Core
3/8" i n t .
@"in
plate
--
231.5
N.
230.5
11, 232.
N.
1'7079
C.
1800*&
Navy
P.
18b6'*
No vy
C.
C.
I. P ,1/32"xl/?i ."F.
C 1. P ,3/16"~3/ltl
l/bllxl/f+n
I"* '
Base in p a e
1/16" f om face
Tabla I1
,.'
-.$?$?,?:
-;
. ,, .
'f.
---
1
tirade
U,
~ o n p . c,
--
L1L
. v . H'+ , i t
, j r) G r L i n s
. > ~L.ItI <'":'c
*.
1, u'l e
t,
i . 0".
.
A ,
t.l,bL
I,.
11
t:
Ni
20
WC
80
227
C!
Vt?
I'
- --- ---
-----Y
-L, L
ik; ,
k
+
20
-----
II
L I L ~N
-
2649
I?
1605
--
.!kin, ! rlcrgy
' !
t e N%,5.
--
----
227.2
(average 217)
~01.it.y
11:
141
:I
--
-'oL-~
1831-A
--
--
-- ,
54,aUO
--
808
1300
-
85,300
"rW
,.
35443
L2i)O
-I
Fe
&
91 234
147
233
---1633
1574
234
200
2j16
20
41290
(810
2316
2092
1604
N~vy
56,000
kr uly
1330 -
636
75,700
----
-6d,500
Navy
(76,000
--
42780
$1750
.,
455,000
235 5
---~--..
Army
1574.
- - ..
--
.-..
.
Table 111
Ballistic 'ata
f o r Carbide ~ n dStandard A . P .
.:
i&
. '.. ..
A
.....
Table 111
f-
Grade
Ballistic
XI
.;,-.t.i : ' ; I ?
LV
KI;
Comp. 5
Bullct
-11
,L:
. , n Le
v . Jt ; * h t
i n Cr.1ins
Csr*l)i.\,c
!-'.
1
1?
ts
., di11st
pj7-I-u
.
:,irni t
- ~ .
esig.
'
Plate
- ---
u
*
, ~ t r ~ i k i n I; nergy
f't
1:
-7
,ore
L1
of
Core
:3t,...~!:!
..?ti
Oblis.
Ve iocity
Pull t
ore
Ccrlibe:* .3U
ins t
Standard
.30X2
-
rrc"
u
- -- .,. -
--
1830
n
03
165
H 3.
232
N
N
147
L; r ~ d y
+22d0
2*74
-- .--NLVY
----- . LbUd
Army
N~VY
' 1633
,
53icOQ
57600
1900
2240
5270U
1it'10
1730
958
1130
r
5 '/30c)
930
1100
r
I
I
f
I
I
I
<.
General
Composition
(Core)
No. of
Average
Grades
Tested
(Core)
Average
Std.
Dev.
=
,a
Co
-wc
~t./~b.
~t / ~ b .
Average
Striking
Energy
Core
~t / ~ b ,
1290.
99-
827.
Striking
Energy
Std.
Dev.
.Bulllet
Std.
Dev.
~t./~b.
21
3
,
9-2OgC0
55300
2200
. ..
Combined
average
of t u g -
cores above
(up to
*56400
20% binder),
A.P.
Tests
... ...- -
..,
2400
1350.
. ..
.. ........ . .. . .
-.
'
&..
857..;;
23
T
:A
--
--
,.
.
.P,. '--
.?;
--
..
,
'
,.:*: .,
. . . .. . .
:
i'
Thickness
bull0t
I
'
,.
030
30
030
3/aW
142"
(1) .;
-608
.685
.784 ..
,366
.472
.
.,
29
-375
.616
. .
.
.
112"
..
k
p
.'30
'
:.
1.50
. . .
.
'i
i;
'
1,
.'855
.
!
.805
-834
i915
-676
627
......
-'
;>.
,,G':2>
.672.
. . . .
.. .
. '
..
'..
'2
995 -
:'i
- t:
.?7&
,.$,
.
:
,
;
:
,
;
\,&; '.
.
.
-490:
...
..
'
..
.
.-"
....
,-
'
.. !
.:
-892
s
. . . ~ o m o ~ e n e o uPlate
. .
a 30
, -998 ,
:
.
'
ihr
,..
;id:.',
.'.
,
. . -
j' . . . . . .
4 ; ,
.
'
(i) i:.
(&',
924
*30
( 1 3 I.!
.i 5/8n
.
--
Face-Hardened Plate
I/,$"
..,
19
---- . _ _ _ __..
1-
:I
. .... ; .. ?'
I.
. i'
'
. .
...
..,. .
:nl
',
.i.:;,.'.:*:..
. .
:
,
..v.
I
I
i
Table e
for
F i r s t Series of T e s t s on Carbide B u l l e t s .
Twenty-Eighth Partial R e ~ o r ton Tests of
Table 111-B.
C o m ~ .%
Grade
Bullet
Ballist i c
Limit
Core
Core
87
80
13
20
..
25
'
Core
Bullet
"75
233 .225
147
140
220
136
'
PO00
1020
1100 app.
1570
1748
60600
1650
61500
1817
1917, app. 64000 app. 1790 app.
'
'c
91
..
-237
151
I @ , - .
''
Fe
-
WC
1816
9
91
Standard 30M2 P.P.
945 appe
234 .
165
147
83
.'
1754
2537
61000
46250
1600
2350
1010
1180
Table 111-B.
-
in Grains
Bullet
Core
Av. w t
Grade
Comp.
Ballistic
Limit
3
Core
Bulle t
'
Core
Standard
- 30M2 A.P.
165
83
3123
73200
3570
1780
Tabla 111-B.
Grad.0
Ballistic
Comr,. $
Bullet
' Core
Limit
Cal. .SO against 1 V a c e Hardened platea
9
13
20
25
94
91
87
80
75
756
745
722
690
670
PO78
l08k
1059
1025
1016
20
80
25
75
Standard
50 Mi A.P.
750-
408
'
6520
17870
7360
7900
45 80
4 5420
5020
5300
5380
Not
Determined
696
676
I049
1651
52700
41813
457500
1772
55300
1860
56800
Not
Determined
'
765
183U
1832A
F
Striking Energy Ft, Lb,
Core
Bullet
Core
100 Yard Rangg
wc
QZ
44A
779
55A
55B
DM25
i n grains
Bullets against
1869
Not
Determined
57200
8100
2577
60400
1100
6010
-
NOTES:
1. The cabalt bearing 'series, and the iron bearing sarllples ( ~ r a d e1 816) were
f i r e d against Disston plate, No. D5
B r i n e l l face 555, back 402. .The nickel
bearing series was f i r e d against Disston plate, No. D6, B r i n e l l face 5 5 5 ,
back 370.
,
The b a l l i s t i c l i m i t s of both plates as determined with standard 30 M2 A , P .
Bullets i n 2 t e s t s , were p r a c t i c a l l y i d e n t i c a l ,
. 2.
Dlebold 5/8" face hardened plate No. 138-700-344, B r i n e l l face 5 5 5 . back L15.
Table 111-B.
(Cont'd)
'
Ballistic Data for Tungsten Csrblde gnd Standard AwPe Bullets against
Face Bardenad Plate.
--;
,.
'
NOTES:
3.
4.
app.
d.
,.:,,:
,-
Table ZV-B
.-.
Average
No. of
Grades
(CoPef
F
Core
Tested
d-
'
'
Ni-WC
Combined average b f
tungsten carbide
cores above
3.
,.
Std,
Dev,
Average
Striking Energy
Bullet
f t . Ib.
BulBe$sr
Std,
. Dev.
Average
Striking Energy
Core
ft; l b ,
ft. l b .
Std.
Dev,
ft, lb,
1033
13
1010
28
(6-20% Ni)
62000
290
61200
8'80.
'
'
1623
13
1590
62
Table IV-B
'
Average
Striking Energy
Core
ft. Ib,
Dev,
ftr Ib.
1780
...-
~td.
1
(9% Ni)
(.
65500
: Combined average of
1 tungsten carbide
65250
250
Std, 30142, A * Y e
73200
--
cores above
3570
--
:
>
Table IV-B
Gmmary of ~ s l l i i : . t i1)s;ts
c
for . ~ e n e r l r lTypes of Tuny sten
Average
Striking Energy
Core
ft. l b o
fts l b r
Std,
Dev
,:
I
1
N%-WC
Conbined average of
tungsten carbide
cores above
'(13-205 Ni)
55600
-.
[b
20% binder 1
to
Test
7590
510
5090
290
7392
480
5016
298
11000
--
6010
--
55200
lP60
60400
--
1
S t d . SOEU, A,P.
1600
enetra
an
at,
-?
I 4.
..
t):
k+.,>
-
?It