UCP Size Estimation

CLIENT CONFIDENTIAL

Template ID:TMP-PM-UCP-5-001

Copyright 2004 Virtusa Corporation

Note:
These documents are strictly for specific Virtusa/Client use only.
They shall not be shared with an external party other than the client concerned.
These documents should always be kept securely and employees shall use
reasonable care protecting these documents from unauthorized use or disclosure to a third party.
This category also covers client intellectual property where Virtusa has a non-disclosure agreement with the client.

tusa Corporation

greement with the client.

Virtusa Corporation

GSK Buyer Survey - Size Estimate

Client
Project
Project Type
Estimators
Last Revision Date
Reviewed By
Review Date
Signed off by (BU Head)

Emtoris
GSK - Buyer Survey
Enhancement
Virtusa
19-Apr
Virtusa
29-Apr

GSK - Buyer Survey Project Estimate

Total Project Estimate

Total Project Effort Estimate

Expected Effort
Estimate

Total UCP Effort Estimate

Total Risk Impact Estimate

Scope Changes Re
8%
12
Testing
16%

1446.6
80.0

Vacation/Sick Allowance
<<Other adjustment factors>>
<<Other adjustment factors>>
<<Other adjustment factors>>

28.9
Implementation Projec
32%
10%

TOTAL EFFORT ESTIMATE

Risk as a % the Total

1555.5
5.5%

<< Add other summary tables as required by the audience - by modules, by phases, etc. >>
Task Estimation Type Summary - Function-wise
Task Type

Total Average Effort Days

Requirement
Design
Project Management
Implementation
Testing
Scope Changes
TOTAL

Percentage

28
46
23
73
37
19
226

15.0%
25.0%
12.0%
40.0%
20.0%
10.0%
122.0%

Testing
34%
Implementation
66%

Task Estimation Type Summary - Phase-wise

Task Type

Total Average Effort Days

Inception
Elaboration
Construction
Transition
Project Management
Scope Changes
TOTAL

Percentage

10
37
118
19
23
19
226

5.0%
20.0%
65.0%
10.0%
12.0%
10.0%
122.0%

5.0
0.0

Percentage
50.0%
0.0%

Total Average
Duration - Days

Percentage
10.0%
30.0%
50.0%
10.0%

100.0%

Average Risk Impact Estimate Type Summary

Task Type
Technical
Travel and Logistic

UCP Size Estimation

Average Risk - Days

3 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

Client
Requirement and Scope
Schedule
Quality
Cost
Environment
Team
Other
TOTAL

0.0
5.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.0

0.0%
50.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
100.0%

Actors
Actor Type
Simple
Average
Complex
Total Actor Weight

No. of Actors

Total Unadjusted Use Case Points (UUCP)

Technical Complexity Factor (TCF)
Environment Complexity Factor (ECF)
Adjusted Use Case Points (AUCP)
Ef Count
Total Efforts (Hours)

UCP Size Estimation

Factor
0
1
2

Actor Weight
1
2
3

2 PI (HRs / UCP)

0
2
6
8

108.00
0.74
0.91
72.33
20.00
1446.55

4 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

e Estimate

ect Estimate

Scope Changes Requirement

8%
12%
Testing
16%
Design
20%
Implementation Project Management
32%
10%

Implementation
61%
Design
39%

ementation

UCP Size Estimation

5 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

Use Cases
Use Case Type
No. of Use Cases
Factor
Simple
2
Average
3
Complex
4
Total Use Case Weight

UCP Size Estimation

Use Case Weight

5
10
15

10
30
60
100

6 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

Actors
SI. No.

Actor Name

Actor Description

Actor Type

1 Actor 1

Application Manager

Complex

2 Actor 2

Buyer Survey Respondent - regular

Average

3 Actor 2

Buyer Survey Respondent - survey-only user

Complex

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47

UCP Size Estimation

7 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

48
49
50

UCP Size Estimation

8 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

Actor Type

Description

Simple

System Interface

Average

Interactive or Protocol Driven Interface

Complex

Graphical Interface

UCP Size Estimation

9 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

UCP Size Estimation

10 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

Use Cases
SI. No.

Use Case Name

Use Case Description

Use Case Type

1 Use Case 1

Buyers registered in the product and also external

individuals not registered in the product are invited to
the Buyer Survey

Complex

2 Use Case 2

User is invited via the email invitation process for a

survey event run by buyer organization. He/She is
created as a user in the product with authorization to
view only the survey page - survey role.

3 Use Case 3

What if the survey email is forwarded?

Average

4 Use Case 4

Host should have the ability to revoke invitation for a

survey-only user.

Complex

5 Use Case 5

Host should be able to handle the responses from a

survey-only user the same way as they can the
responses from regular users.

Complex

6 Use Case 6

If the host deletes a response then a respondent with

a survey role should be able to submit another
response

Average

Complex

7 Use Case 7

When a buyer is setting up an event other than buyer

survey (RFQ, Std. auction, etc.) the list of available
team members that can be invited as hosts/co-hosts
for the event should not include the survey
respondents.

Average

8 Use Case 8

Host by mistake invites a regular user (with a role

other than the survey respondent role say a buyer
agent) via the email. This user should not be created
as a new user in the product. They should be able to
log in as they normally would in the product by typing
in their user name and password

9 Use Case 9

Each organization should be able to turn off the ability

to invite respondents by email.
Simple

Simple

UCP Size Estimation

11 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

UCP Size Estimation

12 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

Use Case Type

Description

Simple

1 - 3 Transactions or < 4 Key scenarios / Execution

paths or < 5 Classes

UCP Size Estimation

13 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

UCP Size Estimation

14 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

Technical Complexity Factor (TCF)

Factor

Description

T1

Distributed system

10

T2

T3

Response time or throughput

performance objectives
End user efficiency

T4

Complex internal processing

T5

Code must be reusable

T6

Easy to install

0.5

T7

Easy to use

0.5

T8

Portable

T9

Easy to change

T10

Concurrent

T11

Includes special security objectives

T12

Provides direct access for third

parties

T13

Special user training facilities are

required

Tfactor

UCP Size Estimation

Weight

Assigned
Value

Calc. Factor

14

15 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

Comment
Assign 5 for Internet application, 3 for
client/server applications, 0 for centralized
system
Assign high values if user requirements indicate
this
Assign high values if user requirements indicate
this
Assign high values if application is very complex
Assign high values if user insists on using some
of the existing components
Assign high values
Use high values
Assign high values if there are any user
specifications related to this factor
Assign high values
Assign high values if applicable
Assign high values if it involves special security
features, otherwise use average values
Assign high values if it involves interaction with
third party products or interaction with web users
Assign low values if no training is involved

UCP Size Estimation

16 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

Environment Factor (EF)

Factor

Description

F1
F2

Familiar with the project model

that is used
Application experience

F3

Object-oriented experience

F4

Lead analyst capability

F5

Motivation

F6

Stable requirements

F7
F8

Weight

Assigned
Value

Calc. Factor

1.5

0.5

0.5

1.5

Part-time staff

-1

Difficult programming language

-1

-4

Efactor

16.5
No. of factors with relevance of < 3

UCP Size Estimation

17 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

Comment
Use 4 or 5 depending on
experience
Use 4 or 5 depending on
experience
Use 4 or 5 depending on
experience
Use < 3 if analyst is not

the project team

the project team
the project team
experienced

Use 5 for development/SQA projects, 4 for

development and maintenance projects 3 for
maintenance projects, 2 for support projects
Assign lower values if requirements are not clear.
Otherwise use 4
Assign low values as we seldom use part time
resources
Use 1 for Visual Basic, 4 for Java, C++ and .Net

UCP Size Estimation

18 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

Detailed Risk Impact Details

List all identified risks and estimated impact in terms of effort.
No.

Risk Description

Risk Category

Estimated Impact - Probability of

Days
Occurrence

Delay in the clarifications for requirements

issues

Requirement and Scope

10.0

50%

The changes to the design during the

implementation phase

Technical

10.0

50%

TOTAL ESTIMATED RISK IMPACT

UCP Size Estimation

19 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

Expected Risk
Impact - Days

High-level Mitigation/Contingency Plan

(The risk should be tracked during the
project using the Risk Sheet)

5.0

The team to have regular meetings with

Burlington team and clarify the issues
5.0

Team to be involved with Burlington team during

the design discussions.

0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.0

UCP Size Estimation

20 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

Assumptions
List all assumptions related to the estimates.

No.

UCP Size Estimation

21 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

UCP Size Estimation

22 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

UCP Size Estimation

23 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

UCP Size Estimation

24 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

Assumptions
List all assumptions related to the estimates.

Assumption

UCP Size Estimation

25 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

UCP Size Estimation

26 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

UCP Size Estimation

27 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

UCP Size Estimation

28 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

Do not edit these data, they are common across all Virtusa projects and are intended to use for aggregate analysis
Actor Type

Description

Simple

System Interface

Factor
1

Average

Interactive or Protocol Driven Interface

Complex

Graphical Interface

Use Case Type

Description

Simple

1 - 3 Transactions or < 4 Key scenarios / Execution paths or

< 5 Classes

Average

4 - 7 Transactions or 4 - 8 Key scenarios / Execution paths

or 5 - 10 Classes

10

Complex

Above 8 Transactions or > 8 Key scenarios / Execution

paths or >10 Classes

15

TCF Value

Description

Factor

Productivity Index

0 Not present, or no influence

1 Incidental influence

Efcount

2 Moderate influence
3 Average influence
4 Significant influence
5 Strong influence throughout
Project Type

Task Types (Core GIP Discipline)

Development

Requirement

Integration

Design

Porting

Project Management

Enhancement

Implementation

SQA

Testing

Staff Augmentation

Deployment
Environment

Complexity

Risk Category List

Technical

Travel and Logistic

Client
Requirement and Scope
Schedule
Quality
Cost
Environment
Team

UCP Size Estimation

29 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

20 to 30 Hrs per AUCP

<3

20 Hrs

3 or 4

28 Hrs

>4

Re-do or take it as 36 Hrs

UCP Size Estimation

30 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

Estimation Metrics
Average Vacation and Sick Percentage

2%

Green Team Productivity Multiplier

1.25

Expert Team Productivity Multiplier

0.75

Average work hours / work days

<<other adjustment factors>>

<<other adjustment factors>>
<<other adjustment factors>>
<<other adjustment factors>>
<<other adjustment factors>>
<<other adjustment factors>>

UCP Size Estimation

31 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

<Project> Use Case Points

Actors
Actor Type

Use Cases
No. of Actors

Factor

Actor Weight

Use Case Type

No. of Use Cases

Simple

Simple

Average

Average

Complex

Complex

Unadjusted Use Case Weights (UUCW)

Unadjusted Actor Weights (UAW)

Unadjusted Use Case Points (UUCP)
Technical Complexity Factor (TCF)
Adjusted Use Case Points (AUCP)
Total Efforts (Hours)
Productivity

UCP Size Estimation

108.00
1.20
129.60
1684.80

13 to 20 Hrs per AUCP

32 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

nts

Factor

Use Case Weight

5

10

10

30

15
(UUCW)

60
100

UCP Size Estimation

33 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

<Project> Use Case Points

Technical Factor (TF)

Factor
number
T1

Description
Test Tools

T2

Documented Inputs

10

T3

Development Environment

T4

Test Environment

T5

Test-ware Reuse

T6

Distributed System

T7

Performance Objectives

T8

Security Features

T9

Complex Interfacing

10

Total Technical Factor for Testing (TTF)

UCP Size Estimation

Weight

Assigned
Value

Extended
Value

55

34 of 35

Virtusa Corporation

Points

Comment

UCP Size Estimation

35 of 35