Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
9-6
$ 100.00
2.0
$ 200.00
Accounts receivable
200.00
2.0
400.00
Inventories
200.00
2.0
400.00
500.00
1.0
500.00
Cash
Total assets
$1,000.00
Accounts payable
$1,500.00
50.00
$ 100.00
50.00
100.00
Notes payable
150.00
150.00
Long-term debt
400.00
400.00
Common stock
100.00
100.00
Retained earnings**
250.00
+ 40
290.00
Accruals
Total liabilities
and equity
$1,000.00
$1,140.00
AFN =
$ 360.00
*Capacity sales = Sales/0.5 = $1,000/0.5 = $2,000 with respect to existing fixed assets.
Target FA = 0.25($2,000) = $500 = Required FA. Since the firm currently has $500 of
fixed assets, no new fixed assets will be required.
**Addition to RE = (M)(S1)(1 Payout ratio) = 0.05($2,000)(0.4) = $40.
9-7
$122.5
$350
=
$17.5
$350
($70)
$10.5
$350
($70)
b.
c.
Upton Computers
Pro Forma Balance Sheet
December 31, 2013
(Millions of Dollars)
2013
Forecast
Pro Forma
Basis %
2013
2012
2013 Sales
$ 3.5
0.0100
$ 4.20
$ 4.20
Receivables
26.0
0.0743
31.20
31.20
Inventories
58.0
0.1657
69.60
69.60
$105.00
$105.00
42.00
42.00
$147.00
$147.00
$ 10.80
$ 10.80
Cash
Accounts payable
Notes payable
Accruals
Additions
$ 87.5
35.0
0.100
$122.5
$ 9.0
0.0257
18.0
8.5
Pro Forma
after
18.00
0.0243
Financing
+13.44
Financing
31.44
10.20
10.20
$ 39.00
$ 52.44
Mortgage loan
6.0
6.00
6.00
Common stock
15.0
15.00
15.00
Retained earnings
66.0
73.56
73.56
$133.56
$147.00
$122.5
7.56*
AFN = $ 13.44
*M = $10.5/$350 = 3%.
11-9
15-7
(1)
Profit
$500,000
50(V)
V
(2)
= P(Q) - FC - V(Q)
= ($100,000)(50) - $2,000,000 - V(50)
= $2,500,000
= $50,000.
New profit
(3)
(4)
Since the return exceeds the 15 percent cost of equity, this analysis suggests that the firm
should go ahead with the change.
Old:
QBE =
F
PV
$2,000,000
$100,000 $50,000
=
= 40 units.
$2,500,000
$95,000 $40,000
New:
QBE =
= 45.45 units.
c. It is impossible to state unequivocally whether the new situation would have more or less
business risk than the old one. We would need information on both the sales probability
distribution and the uncertainty about variable input cost in order to make this determination.
However, since a higher breakeven point, other things held constant, is more risky. Also the
percentage of fixed costs increases:
FC
FC V(Q)
Old:
$2,000,000
$2,000,000 $2,500,000
=
= 44.44%.
FC 2
FC 2 V2 (Q 2 )
New:
$2,500,000
$2,500,000 $2,800,000
=
= 47.17%.
The change in breakeven points--and also the higher percentage of fixed costs--suggests that
the new situation is more risky.
b. b = bU (1 + (1-T)(D/S)).
At 40 percent debt: bL = 0.87 (1 + 0.6(40%/60%)) = 1.218.
rS = 6 + 1.218(4) = 10.872%
c. WACC = wd rd(1-T) + wcers
= (0.4)(9%)(1-0.4) + (0.6)(10.872%) = 8.683%.
FCF
( EBIT )(1 T ) ($14.933)(1 0.4)
WACC
WACC
0.08683
V=
= $103.188 million.
rRF = 5.0%
bU = 0.8
rM rRF = 6.0%
From data given in the problem and table we can develop the following table:
Levered
wd
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
wce
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
D/S
0.00
0.25
0.67
1.50
4.00
rd
rd(1 T)
6.0%
3.60%
7.0%
4.20%
8.0%
4.80%
9.0%
5.40%
10.0%
6.00%
betaa
0.80
0.92
1.12
1.52
2.72
r sb
WACCc
9.80%
9.80%
10.52%
9.26%
11.72%
8.95%
14.12%
8.89%
21.32%
9.06%
Notes:
a
These beta estimates were calculated using the Hamada equation,
b = bU[1 + (1 T)(D/S)].
b
These rs estimates were calculated using the CAPM, rs = rRF + (rM rRF)b.
c
These WACC estimates were calculated with the following equation:
WACC = wd(rd)(1 T) + (wce)(rs).
The firms optimal capital structure is that capital structure which minimizes the firms
WACC. The WACC is minimized at a capital structure consisting of 60% debt and 40%
equity. At that capital structure, the firms WACC is 8.89%.