Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
SIMPLY SUPPORTED
BEAMS
KHALIL BARAKZAI - 7460696
Table of Contents
Introduction and Background..................................................................................... 4
Objective.................................................................................................................... 4
Apparatus................................................................................................................... 4
Procedure................................................................................................................... 4
Presentation of Collected Data................................................................................... 4
Case 1..................................................................................................................... 4
Case 2..................................................................................................................... 5
Case 3..................................................................................................................... 6
Results and Calculations............................................................................................. 7
Discussion.................................................................................................................. 8
Conclusion.................................................................................................................. 8
References.................................................................................................................. 8
List of Tables
Table 1: Experimental Readings for Case 1
.....5
Table 2: Theoretical Values for Case 1 with True Error
5
Table 3: Experimental Readings for Case 2..
6
Table 2: Theoretical Values for Case 2 with True Error .
..6
Table 2: Experimental Readings for Case 3..
6
Table 2: Theoretical Values for Case 3 with True Error
6
List of Figures
Figure 1: Diagram of load P (23.80 N) applied at various distances from
RA..4
Figure 2: Diagram of load P (23.80 N) applied at various distances from both
supports..5
Figure 3: Diagram of P (23.80N) applied as
shown..6
Objective
To determine the reactions at the supports of a simply supported beam for
various loading conditions.
Apparatus
Procedure
We start off by taking the initial reading of each spring balance, or the
reactions of the simply supported beam due to the weight of the beam. We than
apply a single concentrated load of 5.35 lb (23.80 N) at various distances, a, from
the left support A and read both reactions Ra and Rb as shown in figure of the Lab
Manual. We than repeat the measurement with two simultaneous loads of 2.35 lb
(10.5 N) and 5.35 lb (23.80 N) at various distances, a, from both supports, A and B.
We finish off by applying a load to the beam with an overhang outside the support
at B applied at a distance of 6 in (0.152 m).
0.305
0.457
0.61
30
36
42
0.762
0.914
1.067
RA(N)
RB (N)
20.91
5
17.8
15.13
12.01
5
8.9
6.675
3.115
2.67
6.23
9.345
12.01
5
15.13
17.8
20.91
5
Ra(N)
Rb (N)
20.84
17.86
14.89
11.90
8.94
5.97
2.99
2.97
5.95
8.92
11.90
14.87
17.84
20.82
0.35
0.31
1.62
0.93
0.42
11.78
4.33
9.99
4.67
4.79
0.93
1.75
0.20
0.45
Case 2
RA(N)
RB (N)
12.24
13.57
15.58
22.25
20.47
18.69
Ra(N)
Rb (N)
inche
s
6
12
18
meters
0.152
0.305
0.457
11.83
13.22
14.60
22.43
21.05
19.67
(%)
(%)
3.41
2.67
6.70
0.81
2.73
4.98
Case 3
Table 5: Experimental readings for Case 3
Distance, a
inches
meters
6.00
0.15
RA(N)
RB (N)
-1.78
12.24
Table 6: Theoretical values calculated for case 3 with the error calculations
Distance, a
inche meters
s
6.00
0.15
Ra(N)
Rb (N)
-2.09
12.55
14.89
2.48
Note that the negative value of RA indicates that it is pointing downwards rather
than upwards as the diagram seems to suggest.
5.35
a
1.22
Fy=0:
RA + RB = P
RA = P - R B
For case 2, the theoretical values were calculated with the same approach as for case 1.
Please refer to figure 2
MA=0:
P1*(a) - P2*(1.22 - a) + RB*(1.22) = 0
Where P1 = 10.46 N and P2 = 23.81 N
RB =
10.46a+ 23.81(1.22a)
1.22
Fy=0:
RA + RB = P1 + P2
RA = 34.265 - RB
where P = 10.46 N
10.460.912
=12.55 N
0.76
Fy=0:
RA+RB = P
RA = -2.0915
True Error Calculations
True Error=
Discussion
The results of this experiment are acceptable as there is a relatively small
error between the theoretical values and the experimental values in each case.
Case 1 had an average error of only 2.82% at R A and 3.25% for RB, case 2 had an
average of 1.83% and 1.22% for RA and RB respectively and case 3 had a true error
of 14.89% and 2.48 % for RA and RB respectively. Case three is the only one with an
error over 5 % which is tells us that our experiment, for the most part, is acceptable.
Possible error sources include not measuring the distance a correctly, or not
applying the weight exactly at the specified distance a. Another source of error
8
could have come from the fact that the spring scales may not have been properly
calibrated and therefore reported false readings. The final source of error could have
come from the fact that it is really hard to read the values on the spring scale with
the human eye as it is not digital and rounding errors could therefore have occurred.
Conclusion
In conclusion the experiment presented good results with little error, this
experiment is suitable in testing reactions at the supports of a simply-supported
beam.
References
1. Lab Manual, CVG2140, Mechanics of Materials, W2015