Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Prepr. Pap.-Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Energy Fuels Chem. 2012, 57(2), 1017
Proceedings Published 2012 by the American Chemical Society
Figu
ure 2. Full charracterisation of feed
fe blend B.
In ffigure 1, the ap
ppearance of deetectable surfacce coke occurs at
arouund 5 TSM, whiich is followed by
b an initial perriod of depositio
on,
thenn by a rapid, cataastrophic, period
d of deposition at
a around 14 TSM
M.
The three stages of surface
s
coke forrmation is a com
mmon characteristic
for every feed, with durations and
d rates at each stage
s
different for
f
eachh feed: The Indu
uction Period iss thought to represent a period of
foullant precursor transformationss (e.g. decreasse in asphalteene
soluubility via side-cchain cleavage, condensation
c
and
d dehydrogenation
of rresins, and chan
nges in maltenee solvency) initially resulting in
neglligible generation and deposiit. The point at
a which surfaace
depoosition first beco
omes significantt though must alsso be dependent to
som
me extent on both
h the chemical and
a physical natture of the surfaace
and its relative attraaction to foulantt or foulant preccursors. The Inittial
d by a gradual rate
r of deposition
n. The rate is allso
Stagge is represented
uniqque for each feeed. Over this staage, catalytic gro
owth is thought to
be thhe prevailing coke formation meechanism. The Significant
S
Stagee is
alsoo characterized by rate and on
nset severity. At
A these severitiies
how
wever, catalytic growth
g
plays an
n ever-diminishin
ng role, as foulaant
Prepr. Pap.-Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Energy Fuels Chem. 2012, 57(2), 1018
Proceedings Published 2012 by the American Chemical Society
Figu
ure 4. The perfo
ormance of passivator additives appears to be feeed
speccific, and is meeasured by the intensity of passsivator chemisttry
signnature under X-R
Ray microscopy.
The feed under ex
xamination in figure 4 revealls that passivattor
b performance. Also displayeed on figure 4 are
a
techhnology D has best
phottomicrographs of
o the reactor in
nserts under vissible light (abov
ve)
and focused X-Ray
ys (below). The performance iss measured by the
t
intennsity of the passivator
p
chem
mical signaturee. For passivattor
techhnology D, thee signature is most intense and widespreead
sugggesting that even
n after pyrolysiss at relatively hiigh severity, mu
uch
of thhe insert surfacee is visibly clear of coke deposit. In summary, itt is
important for the passivation
p
step
p to be perform
med on as clean
n a
ults in maximu
um surface co
oke
surfface as possiblle, which resu
inhibition, and faciliitates ease of rem
moval.
In an attemp
pt to narrow the performancce variability of
passsivators, Nalco has
h developed a passivation tecchnology that may
m
be aapplied to most feed
f
type conditiions. The techniq
que is described in
a reecent patent3. The
T process of passivation
p
is unique,
u
and rath
her
com
mplex, as it is comprised of two stages, orr two passivation
chem
mistries, which have to be app
plied separately and in sequencce.
The process is someewhat versatile, as it may be adaapted for most un
nit
t technology iss a
startt up programs. A further advantage offered by the
uniqque performancee synergy with continuous
c
dosee high temperatu
ure
cokee suppressant chemistry, which is not obseerved with oth
her
addiitive combinatio
ons. The synergy
y is significant, as
a it also perform
ms
overr a wide range of
o feed types, inccluding the problematic Brazil and
a
Wesst Africa blend
ds. Laboratory data depicting the performan
nce
syneergy is displayed in figure 5, where a dram
matic increase in
perfformance is observed for the neew two stage prrocedure and high
Prepr. Pap.-Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Energy Fuels Chem. 2012, 57(2), 1019
Proceedings Published 2012 by the American Chemical Society
Figu
ure 7. Field data depicting the performan
nce of laborato
ory
desiigned antifoulantt additive packag
ge to visbreaker furnace.
In tthe initial untreeated run (denoted by data in red), heater tu
ube
cokiing is so rapid that
t
conversion is reduced after only 60 days and
a
the uunit shut down for
f decoking aftter 100 days. Succh interruptions in
proccessing can lead to significant lo
oss of revenue.
his
An investigattion into the fouling characcteristics of th
oppoortunity feed using the techniqu
ues described ab
bove revealed it to
exhiibit Feed Type B behavior i.e. sh
howing a high teendency to surfaace
depoosition over fo
ormation of insolubles in the bulk phase. The
T
folloowing run was started
s
using thee two stage passivation procedurre,
withh continuous high temperatture coke sup
ppressant dosaage
throoughout. In this treated
t
run the feed
fe composition
n was similar, wiith
up tto 35% opportun
nity crude, and conversion
c
target remained simillar
to thhe untreated run
n, therefore theree was not an ag
ggressive approaach
to conversion increaase. In fact, the target was to maintain
m
run leng
gth
for a prescheduled
d, larger scale, turn around. The
T treated run is
denooted by the bluee data points in figure
f
7. Over th
he initial days aft
fter
startt up, there is a dramatic diffference between
n the treated and
a
untrreated run. Simiilar to the laborratory studies, an
a increase to the
t
period of time thatt coke surface deposition is reelatively inhibitted
und 60 days or so,
s the tube metal
appeears to be apparrent. After arou
tempperature (TMT)) begins to rise, but at a signifficantly lower raate
than unnder untreated cconditions. At a run length off 170 days, the
converssion is reduced slightly to facillitate operation to the targeted
shut doown date. Howeever, over the peeriod when the vvisbreaker was
operatinng comparablyy to untreatedd conditions, tthe laboratory
designeed antifoulant trreatment packagge succeeded in increasing run
length bby 70 days, or 70 %. This is a significant inncrease that the
refineryy operators are vvery satisfied witth.
Thhe data presennted here dem
monstrates how a systematic
approacch to the designn of antifoulantt additive treatm
ment programs
involvinng precise and uunique laboratorry work can havve a significant
impact on fired heaterr performance bby effectively reeducing surface
coke foormation and depposition.
usions
Conclu
A laboratory pyyrolysis apparattus and proceddure has been
developped by Nalco too characterize aand relatively raank the fouling
tendenccy of heavy resiidue feeds by coombining stability parameters,
and a measure of buulk liquid and surface coke fformation. The
techniqque offers a meethod to distingguish between nnormal fouling
feeds aand those feeds that exhibit a relatively greatter affinity for
surface fouling over buulk liquid phase ccoke formation. The reason for
the obs erved differencees is currently uunder investigatioon. Antifoulant
treatmeent programs have been sppecially designed using the
informaation on fouling tendency, and w
whether or not thhe feed exhibits
a high affinity for ssurface fouling. In such insttances, surface
passivaation is a key tacctic, although sccreening in the rrig is necessary
as theree is some feed ttype specificity.. The variation was somewhat
negatedd by the deveelopment of a new two stagge passivation
proceduure, which also eexhibits a usefull synergistic relaationship with a
particullar high tempperature coke suppressant material. Under
laboratoory conditions, the treatment prrogram effectiveely inhibits the
onset oof significant suurface coke form
mation, and sugggests that unit
operatoors may be able to extend run length or increaase conversion.
Indeed,, the program ddescribed above was applied to a real furnace
heater oon a visbreaker, where the leadinng skin tube meetal temperature
indicateed that the treattment package eextended visbreaaker run length
by at leeast 70 %.
Referen
nces
(1) Ruussell, C. A., Croozier, S., Sharpee, R. Energy andd Fuels, 2010,
244, 5483.
(2) W
Wiehe, I. A. Proceess chemistry off petroleum macrromolecules,
RC Press, Taylorr and Francis Grroup: Florida, 20008
CR
(3) Shharpe, R., Russelll, C. A., Crozierr, S. (Nalco Co., USA).
Suurface passivatioon technique for reduction of fouuling. US
Paatent 8,092,618 B
B2, January 10, 22012
Prepr. Pap.-Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Energy Fuels Chem. 2012, 57(2), 1020
Proceedings Published 2012 by the American Chemical Society