Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Process Analysis
Process Analysis
Processes may be the least understood
and managed aspect of a business
A firm cannot gain a competitive advantage
with faulty processes
Either adapt the processes to the changing
needs of customers or cease to exist!
A Systematic Approach-process
analysis
Define
scope
2
Identify
opportunity
1
Document
process
3
Implement
changes
6
Evaluate
performance
4
Redesign
process
5
Process Analysis: documentation and detailed understanding of how work is performed and
how it can be redesigned
3 3
3 6
3 7
3 9
Flowcharts
Traces the flow of information, customers,
equipment, or materials thru various steps of a
process
Various names: flow diagrams, process maps,
relationship maps, blueprints
3 11
Flowcharts
Marketing
lead
Sales: Initial
conversation
with client
Sales and/or
consulting
drafts proposal
Sales
lead
Follow-up
conversation
between client
and sales
No
Consulting:
Initial
conversation
with client
Consulting
lead
Consulting
drafts
proposal
Follow-up
conversation
between client
and consulting
Line of visibility
Follow-up by
accounting,
sales, or
consulting
Client billed by
accounting,
sales, or
consulting
Yes
Approval
by
consulting?
Is
proposal
complete?
Yes
Nested Process
Client agreement
and service
delivery
Final invoice
created by
accounting, sales,
or consulting
No
No
Payment
received?
Yes
Finish
Flowcharts
Is
proposal
complete?
Final invoice
created by
accounting, sales,
or consulting
Verbal OK
from client
Form
completed by
sales or
consulting
Project
manager
assigned
Delivery of
service by
consulting
50% invoiced
by accounting,
sales, or
consulting
Letter of
agreement
signed
Figure 4.3 Flowchart of the Nested Sub-process of Client Agreement and Service Delivery
3 13
CUSTOMER
Order
completed
and submitted
100%
of credit
checked within
24 hours
Two
scheduling
errors per
quarter
Payment
sent
FINANCE
New
Yes
customer?
Credit
check
OK?
Yes
Production
scheduled
Items
manufactured
Packages
assembled and
inventoried
Order
Invoice
sent
Order
stopped
Order
picked
Product packages
Inventory
adjusted
Invoice
prepared
Payment
received
Notice of shipment
Production Control
and Manufacturing
Order
entered
No
Order cancellation
Order
Order
received
No
Assembly and
Shipping
Payment
Order
cancelled
Credit and
invoicing
PRODUCTION
Product
and invoice
received
Order
Order
generated
SALES
Flowcharts
Order
shipped
Figure 4.4 Flowchart of the Order-Filling Process Showing Handoffs Between Departments
3 14
Service blueprints
A special flowchart that shows which steps
have high customer contact
3 15
Service blueprints-contd.
3 16
Service blueprints-contd.
3 17
Process Charts
An organized way to document all the
activities performed by a person or group
of people at a workstation with a customer
or with certain materials
Transportation,
Inspection,
Delay,
Storage,
3 18
Process Charts-contd.
Operations: changes, creates, adds smth
Process Charts
Step
No.
Time
(min)
Distance
(ft)
0.50
15.0
10.00
0.75
3.00
0.75
1.00
1.00
4.00
5.00
10
2.00
11
3.00
12
2.00
13
3.00
14
2.00
15
1.00
16
4.00
17
2.00
18
4.00
19
1.00
X
40.0
X
40.0
X
X
60.0
Return to bed in ER
X
X
Walk to pharmacy
Pick up prescription
X
20.0
X
180.0
X
60.0
200.0
200.0
Step Description
Summary
Process Charts
Activity
Number
of Steps
Time
(min)
5
23.00
9
11.00
Transport
Step Description
Enter emergency room, approach patient window
X
Inspect
2
8.00
Distance
(ft)
Operation
Step
No.
Time
(min)
Distance
(ft)
0.50
15.0
10.00
0.75
3.00
0.75
1.00
1.00
4.00
5.00
10
2.00
11
3.00
12
2.00
13
3.00
14
2.00
15
1.00
16
4.00
17
2.00
18
4.00
19
1.00
40.0
40.0
X
60.0
X
200.0
Return to bed in ER
X
X
X
180.0
X
60.0
X
200.0
X
X
Walk to pharmacy
Pick up prescription
X
20.0
815
Process Charts
The annual cost of an entire process can
be estimated
It is the product of
1) Time in hours to perform the process each
time
2) Variable costs per hour
3) Number of times the process is performed
each year
Annual
labor cost
Time to perform
the process in hours
Variable costs
per hour
3 22
Process Charts
If the average time to serve a customer is
4 hours
The variable cost is $25 per hour
3 23
2.
3.
4.
Obs 2
Obs 3
Obs 4
Average
(min)
RF
Normal
Time
Element 1
2.60
2.34
3.12
2.86
2.730
1.0
2.730
Element 2
4.94
4.78
5.10
4.68
4.875
1.1
5.363
Element 3
2.18
1.98
2.13
2.25
2.135
0.9
1.922
The normal time for an element in the table is its average time,
multiplied by the RF. The total normal time for the whole
process is the sum of the normal times for the three elements,
or 10.01 minutes. To get the standard time (ST) for the process,
just add in the allowance, or
ST = 10.014(1 + 0.18) = 11.82 minutes/watch
3 27
3 29
Work Sampling
Via randomized observations over time, work
sampling estimates the proportion of time spent
on different activities
Activities can be working on a service/product,
doing paperwork, waiting for maintenance, being
idle use this data to assess productivity,
estimate allowances needed to set standards for
other work measurement methods and spot areas
for process improvement
Best used for highly divergent and flexible-flow
processes
3 30
Work Sampling-contd.
z 2 p 1 p
n
e2
Figure 4.6 Work Sampling Study of Admission Clerk at Health Clinic Using OM Explorer
3 31
Learning Curves
Previous techniques are good if the process is
stable.
Learning curve analysis takes into account that
learning takes place on an ongoing basis e.g. new
products/services are introduced frequently
Learning effects e.g. instruction and repetition can
be anticipated via a learning curve: relationship
between processing time and the cumulative
quantity of a product produced
Time required to produce a unit decreases as
more units are processed
Learning curve depends on the learning rate and
the real or estimated time for the first unit
produced
3 32
Learning Curves-contd.
Figure 4.7 Learning Curve with 80% Learning Rate
140,000
120,000
100,000
80,000
60,000
40,000
20,000
0|
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
3 33
Learning Curve-contd.
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
Learning curve
0.10
Learning
0.05 period
|
50
Standard time
|
|
|
100 150 200
|
|
250 300
3 36
3 37
50
40
30
20
10
0
40
80
120 160 200 240
Cumulative units produced
280
3 39
Checklists
A form used to record the frequency of
occurrence of certain process failures
(performance shortfalls) e.g. error, delay,
waste, rework
3 41
Pareto Charts
Out of several process problems, we need
to decide which ones to attack first
A problem is caused by vital few of its
factors vital few-trivial many
Paretos 80-20 rule: 80% of the activity is
caused by 20% of its factors
Frequency
Discourteous server
12
Slow service
42
Cold dinner
Cramped table
20
Atmosphere
10
3 43
Failures
Figure 4.9 is a bar chart and Figure 4.10 is a Pareto chart, both
created with OM Explorers Bar, Pareto, and Line Charts solver.
They present the data in a way that shows which complaints are
more prevalent (the vital few).
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
10
5
0
Discourteous
server
Slow
service
Cold
dinner
Cramped
tables
Atmosphere
Failure Name
3 44
45
40
Failures
30
60.0%
25
40.0%
20
10
20.0%
Percent of Total
80.0%
35
5
0.0%
0
Slow
service
Cramped
tables
Discourteous
server
Atmosphere
Cold
dinner
Failure Name
3 45
3 46
Personnel
Other
Mechanical failures
Weather
Unavailable cockpit crew
Procedures
SOLUTION
Step 1: A checklist of different types of process failures is
constructed from last months production records.
Step 2: A Pareto chart is prepared from the checklist data.
50
Defect type
Tally
A. Tears in fabric
|| ||
B. Discolored fabric
|||
D. Ragged edges
Total
| ||| ||
36
7
Total
50
80
30
60
20
40
10
20
D
A
Cumulative Percentage
Step 1. Checklist
Number of Failures
40
100
B
0
Defect Failure
Figure 4.12 Application of the Tools
for Improving Quality
3 51
Materials
Training
Out of specification
Absenteeism
Not available
Communication
Humidity
Machine
maintenance
Schedule change
Machine speed
Other
Wrong setup
Process
Broken
fiber
board
20
Number of Broken Fiber Boards
15
10
0
First Second Third
Shift
Figure 4.12 Application of the Tools
for Improving Quality
3 52
3 53
3 54
Generating Ideas
Brainstorming involves a group of people
knowledgeable about the process
proposing ideas for change by saying
whatever comes to mind creativity
Benchmarking- a long-term
continuous improvement
Benchmarking is a systematic procedure that
measures a firms processes, services, and
products against the leaders
Used to understand how outstanding
companies do things so that they can improve
their own businesses
Competitive benchmarking is based on
comparisons with a direct competitor
Benchmarking
There are four basic steps
Benchmarking
New Service/Product Development Process
Benchmarking
Customer Relationship Process
Managing Processes
Failure to manage processes is failure to
manage the business
Implementing a beautifully redesigned
process is only the beginning to
continually monitoring and improving
processes
Seven common mistakes
1. Not connecting with strategic issues
2. Not involving the right people in the right way
Managing Processes
Seven common mistakes
4. Not being satisfied unless fundamental
reengineering changes are made
5. Not considering the impact on people
6. Not giving attention to implementation
3 62
Solved Problem 1
Create a flowchart for the following telephone-ordering process
at a retail chain that specializes in selling books and music
CDs. It provides an ordering system via the telephone to its
time-sensitive customers besides its regular store sales.
The automated system greets customers, asks them to choose
a tone or pulse phone, and routes them accordingly.
The system checks to see whether customers have an existing
account. They can wait for the service representative to open a
new account.
3 63
Solved Problem 1
SOLUTION
Solved Problem 1
SOLUTION
Solved Problem 2
An automobile service is having difficulty providing oil changes
in the 29 minutes or less mentioned in its advertising. You are
to analyze the process of changing automobile engine oil. The
subject of the study is the service mechanic. The process
begins when the mechanic directs the customers arrival and
ends when the customer pays for the services.
SOLUTION
Figure 4.15 shows the completed process chart. The process is
broken into 21 steps. A summary of the times and distances
traveled is shown in the upper right-hand corner of the process
chart.
The times add up to 28 minutes, which does not allow much
room for error if the 29-minute guarantee is to be met and the
mechanic travels a total of 420 feet.
3 66
Solved Problem 2
Step
No.
Time
(min)
Distance
(ft)
0.80
50.0
1.80
2.30
0.80
0.60
0.70
0.90
1.90
0.40
10
0.60
11
4.20
12
0.70
13
2.70
14
1.30
15
0.50
16
1.00
17
3.00
18
0.70
19
0.30
20
0.50
21
2.30
Number
Time
ActivityRecord name and desired service
of Steps
(min)
X
X
0.30
Recommend additional8services
Transport
X
X
X
X
InspectWalk to storeroom
Delay
X
40.0
0.30
Walk to pit
X
X
X
0.70
60.0
to service1pit
Carry filter(s)
Look up filter number(s)
1
5.00
80.0
40.0
420
Store
5.50
X
50.0
Distance
(ft)
7 area 16.50
Operation
in waiting
Walk to customer
70.0
Step Description
Summary
3 67
Solved Problem 3
What improvement can you make in the process shown in
Figure 4.14?
SOLUTION
Your analysis should verify the following three ideas for
improvement. You may also be able to come up with others.
a. Move Step 17 to Step 21. Customers should not have to wait
while the mechanic cleans the work area.
b. Store small inventories of frequently used filters in the pit.
Steps 7 and 10 involve travel to the storeroom.
c. Use two mechanics. Steps 10, 12, 15, and 17 involve running
up and down the steps to the pit. Much of this travel could
be eliminated.
3 68
Solved Problem 4
Vera Johnson and Merris Williams manufacture vanishing
cream. Their packaging process has four steps: (1) mix, (2)
fill, (3) cap, and (4) label. They have had the reported defects
analyzed, which shows the following:
Defect
Lumps of unmixed product
Frequency
7
18
6
29
Total
60
3 69
Solved Problem 4
SOLUTION
3 70
Solved Problem 4
7
100% = 11.67% of defects; the
60
cumulative percentage is
Lumps represent
6
100% = 10.00% of defects; the
60
cumulative percentage is
10% + 90% = 100.00%
The Pareto chart is shown in Figure 4.16
3 71
Solved Problem 4
100
90%
36
78%
32
Frequency of Defects
100%
90
80
28
70
24
60
20
48%
50
16
40
12
30
20
10
Label
Fill
Mix
Seal
40