Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 6

# SOME STRENGTHENED RESULTS ON GERRETSENS INEQUALITIES

## SHAN-HE WU AND ZHI-HUA ZHANG

Abstract. In this paper, we give some strengthened results on Gerretsens inequalities, and establish a parameter form for Gerretsens inequalities by using power series.

## 1. Introduction and Notations

In practice we assume that s denotes the semi-perimeter of triangle ABC, R the circumradius,
r the inradius, and (2n 3) !! = 1 3 5 (2n 3). In addition we have (1) !! = 1.
In 1953, J.C.Gerretsen  obtained the following important double inequalities:
Theorem 1.1. In every triangle we have the double-sided inequality
(1.1)

## 16Rr 5r2 s2 4R2 + 4Rr + 3r2 .

Gerretsens inequality (1.1) has broad applications in geometric inequalities, and is a powerul
tool of research in geometric inequalities. It is as important to geometric inequality theory as
Holders inequality is to analytic inequality theory.
The purpose of this note is to present a simple but powerful form of strengthening Gerretsens
inequalities for triangles. The parameter form for Gerretsens inequalities are established by using
power series.
2. The Strengthened Form of Gerretsens Inequalities
In this paper, the following three lemmas are necessary:
Lemma 2.1. (Basic inequalities for the triangle ) In every triangle we have
p
p
(2.1) 2R2 + 10Rr r2 2(R 2r) R2 2Rr s2 2R2 + 10Rr r2 + 2(R 2r) R2 2Rr.
Lemma 2.2. Assume 1 x 1 and 0 < < 1, we have the following power series expansion
(2.2)

(1 + x) = 1 +

X
( 1)( 2) ( n + 1)

n!

n=1

xn

## and the following Bernoullis inequality 

(2.3)

(1 + x) 1 + x

Lemma 2.3. Assume 1 < x < 1, the following power series expansion is well-known

(2.4)

X
1
=
xn .
1x
n=0

## Date: July 15, 2003.

1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 26D15.
Key words and phrases. Gerretsens inequalities, Eulers inequality, power series, strengthen, parameter.
The authors would like to thank professor Han-fang Zhang and the anonymous referee for some valuable suggestions
which have improved the final version of this paper.
This paper was typeset using AMS-LATEX.
1

## Theorem 2.1. In every triangle the following inequalities hold

16Rr 5r2 +

(2.5)

r2 (R 2r)
r2 (R 2r)
s2 4R2 + 4Rr + 3r2
.
Rr
Rr

Proof. Since basic inequalities (2.1) for the triangle are equivalent to the following inequalities:
p
(2.6)
16Rr 5r2 + 2(R 2r)(R r R2 2Rr) s2
p
4R2 + 4Rr + 3r2 2(R 2r)(R r R2 2Rr).
From Eulers inequality R 2r and Bernoullis inequality (2.3), we have
r
1,
R r > 0, 0 <
Rr
and
s
#
"
2 2Rr

R
R r R2 2Rr = (R r) 1
(R r)2
s
"
#

2
r2
1
r
r2
= (R r) 1 1

(R

r)
=
.
2
(R r)
2
Rr
2(R r)
According to (2.6), it is easy to obtain (2.5). The proof of Theorem 2.1 is completed.

The inequalities (2.5) were also proved by Xue-zhi Yang in , by the use of appropriate trigonometric inequalities.
Now, we will give a generalized result:
Theorem 2.2. In every triangle we have the following inequalities

 2n1

X
(2n 3) !!
r
2
(2.7)
16Rr 5r + r(R 2 r)
s2
2n1 n !
Rr
n=1

2n1

X
(2n 3) !!
r
2
2
4R + 4Rr + 3r r(R 2 r)
.
2n 1 n !
Rr
n=1

## Proof. In (2.6), we have obtained the following equality:

s
"
p
R r R2 2Rr = (R r) 1 1

#
r2
.
(R r)2

Let

r
= x (0 < x 1),
Rr
then
p
p
R r R2 2Rr = (R r)(1 1 x2 ).
From the power series expansion (2.2), we have

p
1 2 X (2n 3) !! 2n
2
1x = 1 x
x
(0 < x 1),
2
2n n !
n=2

or
1

x2

n=2

n=1

X ( 2n 3 ) !!
X (2n 3) !!
r
1
2n 1
= x [x+
x
]
=
2
2n 1 n !
2(R r)
2n 1 n !


2n 1

p
1 X (2n 3) !!
r
2
(2.8)
R r R 2Rr = r
.
2
2n 1 n !
Rr
n=1

r
Rr

2n 1
.

## SOME STRENGTHENED RESULTS ON GERRETSENS INEQUALITIES

Combining expressions (2.6) and (2.8) we obtain (2.7). Theorem 2.2 is proved.

(2.9)

where

X
(2n 3 ) !!
=
2n 1 n !
n=1

"

m1

m=1

r
R+r

 m #2n1
.

## Proof. From the power series expansion (2.4), we have


1
m X
m



r
2r
r X
2r
r
r
m1
=
1
=
=
2
.
(2.10)
Rr
R+r
R+r
R+r
R+r
R+r
m=0

m=1

Combining expression (2.7) and (2.10) we immediately get (2.9). Theorem 2.3 is proved.

## 3. The Parameter Form of Gerretsens Inequalities

In this section, we will establish a parameterised form of Gerretsens inequalities.
Theorem 3.1. Let be a nonzero real number, in every triangle we have the following inequalities
(3.1)

where

1
( 1)2 R2 + 2(2 + 5 + 2)Rr (4 + )r2 + (R 2r) (1 2 )R 2r s2
2

1
( + 1)2 R2 2(2 5 + 2)Rr + (4 )r2 (R 2r) (1 2 )R 2r ,
2
2n1

X
( 2n 3 ) !! (1 2 )R 2r
=
.
2n 1 n ! (1 + 2 )R 2r
n=1

## Proof. When > 0, from inequality (2.1), we have

p
2R2 + 10Rr r2 2(R 2r) R2 2Rr s2
p
2R2 + 10Rr r2 + 2(R 2r) R2 2Rr,
or
(3.2)

## ( 1)2 R2 + 2(2 + 5 + 2)Rr (4 + )r2

p
+(R 2r)[(2 + 1)R 2r 2 R2 2Rr] s2

p
( + 1)2 R2 2(2 5 + 2)Rr + (4 )r2 (R 2r)[(2 + 1)R 2r 2 R2 2Rr],
From Eulers inequality R 2r, we obtain (2 + 1)R 2r > 0, and
s
"
#
2
p
2 2Rr)
4
(R
2
2
( + 1)R 2r 2 R2 2Rr = [( + 1)R 2r] 1
[(1 + 2 )R 2r]2

s
2

2
(1

)R

2r
.
= [(2 + 1)R 2r] 1 1
(1 + 2 )R 2r
Let

(1 2 )R 2r

(1 + 2 )R 2r

then
(2 + 1)R 2r 2

= x(0 < x 1),

p
1 x2 ).

## From the power series expansion (2.2), we have

p
1 X (2n 3) !! 2n 1
2
1 1x = x
x
,
2
2n 1 n !
n=1

and

p
X
1
(2n 3) !!
(3.3) ( + 1)R 2r 2 R2 2Rr = (1 2 )R 2r
2
2n 1 n !
2

n=1

(1 2 )R 2r 2n1

.
(1 + 2 )R 2r

## Combining expression (3.2) and (3.3), the inequality (3.1) is proved.

If < 0, then > 0, applying the above result, we have

1
( 1)2 R2 + 2(2 5 + 2)Rr (4 )r2 + (R 2r) (1 2 )R 2r s2
2

1
( + 1)2 R2 2(2 + 5 + 2)Rr + (4 + )r2 (R 2r) (1 2 )R 2r .
2
It is easy to see that above inequalities are equivalent to inequalities (3.1). The proof of Theorem
3.1 is completed.

Theorem 3.2. Let , t be real number, and 6= 2t, in every triangle we have the following inequalities
(3.4) (t 1)2 R3 + 2 [t2 + ( + 5)t + 2]R2 r [(4 + 1)t + 2 + 10 + 4]Rr2 + (22 + )r3
1
+ (R 2r) |( tR r)2 R(R 2r )| (tR r)s2
2
(t + 1)2 R3 2[t2 + ( 5)t + + 2]R2 r + [(4 1)t + 2 10 + 4]Rr2 (22 )r3
1
(R 2r) |( tR r)2 R(R 2r )| ,
2
where

2n 1

X
(2n 3) !! (tR r)2 R(R 2r)
=
.
2n 1 n ! (tR r)2 + R(R 2r)
n=1

## Proof. From inequality (2.1), we have

p

(3.5)
| tR r | [ s2 2R2 10Rr + r2 2(R 2r) R2 2Rr ] 0.

## Since (3.5) (tR r)(s2 2R2 10Rr + r2 ) 2 | tR r | (R 2r) R2 2Rr

p
(tR r)(2R2 + 10Rr r2 ) 2 | tR r | (R 2r) R2 2Rr (tR r)s2
p
(tR r)(2R2 + 10Rr r2 ) + 2 | tR r | (R 2r) R2 2Rr,
that is
(3.6)

## (t 1)2 R3 + 2[t2 + ( + 5)t + 2]R2 r [(4 + 1)t + 2 + 10 + 4]Rr2 + (22 + )r3

p
+(R 2r)[ (tR r)2 + R(R 2r) 2 |tR r| R2 2Rr ] (tR r)s2

## (t + 1)2 R3 2[t2 + ( 5)t + + 2]R2 r + [(4 1)t + 2 10 + 4]Rr2 (22 )r3

p
(R 2r)[(tR r)2 + R(R 2r) 2 |tR r| R2 2Rr].
According to 6= 2t and Eulers inequality R 2r, we obtain (tR r)2 + R(R 2r) > 0, and
p
(tR r)2 + R(R 2r) 2 |tR r| R2 2Rr
s
"
#
4(tR r)2 (R2 2Rr)
2
= [(tR r) + R(R 2r)] 1
[(tR r)2 + R(R 2r)]2

## (tR r)2 R(R 2r)

1
(tR r)2 + R(R 2r)


2

Let

(tR r)2 R(R 2r)

(tR r)2 + R(R 2r) = x(0 < x 1),
then
(tR r)2 + R(R 2r) 2 |tR r|

1 x2 ),

## From the power series expansion (2.2), we have

1 X (2n 3) !! 2n 1
1 x2 = x
x
,
2
2n 1 n !
n=1

therefore
p
(tR r)2 + R(R 2r) 2 |tR r| R2 2Rr

2n 1

X
1
(2n 3) !! (tR r)2 R(R 2r)
2
= [(tR r) R(R 2r)]
.
2
2n 1 n ! (tR r)2 + R(R 2r)

(3.7)

n=1

Combining expression (3.6) and (3.7) we can get the inequalities (3.4). Theorem 3.2 is proved. 
Now, we give some corollaries from Theorem 3.1 and Theorem 3.2.
Corollary 3.1. Let , t be real numbers, respectively, and 6= 2t, in every triangle we have the
following inequalities
(3.8) (t1)2 R3 +2 [t2 +(+5)t+2]R2 r[(4+1)t+2 +10+4]Rr2 +(22 +)r3 (tRr)s2
(t + 1)2 R3 2[t2 + ( 5)t + + 2]R2 r + [(4 1)t + 2 10 + 4]Rr2 (22 )r3 .
Corollary 3.2. Let be a nonzero real numbers, in every triangle we have the following double
inequality
( 1)2 R2 + 2(2 + 5 + 2)Rr (4 + )r2 s2

(3.9)

## ( + 1)2 R2 2(2 5 + 2)Rr + (4 )r2 .

Inequalities (3.8) ,(3.9) include Gerretsens inequalities and a lot of new geometric inequalities.
Corollary 3.3. Let , t be real numbers, respectively, and 6= 2t, in every triangle we have the
following double inequality
(3.10) (t 1)2 R3 + 2 [t2 + ( + 5)t + 2]R2 r [(4 + 1)t + 2 + 10 + 4]Rr2 + (22 + )r3
1
+ (R 2r) |( tR r)2 R(R 2r )| (tR r)s2
2
(t + 1)2 R3 2[t2 + ( 5)t + + 2]R2 r + [(4 1)t + 2 10 + 4]Rr2 (22 )r3
1
(R 2r) |( tR r)2 R(R 2r )| ,
2
where

X
X
( 2m 3 ) !!
1
2Rr
2

=
[
(tR

r)

R(R

2r)
2n1 (
)n ]2m1 .
m

1
2
2
m ! 2Rr
(tR r) + R(R + 2r)
m=1

n=1

## Proof. From Eulers inequality R 2r, we obtain

4Rr
4Rr
0<

< 1.
2
(tR r) + R(R + 2r)
(tR r)2 + 4Rr
Using the power series expansion (2.4), we have

(tR r)2 R(R 2r) (tR r)2 R(R 2r) (tR r)2 + R(R + 2r)

(3.11)
(tR r)2 + R(R 2r) = (tR r)2 + R(R + 2r) (tR r)2 + R(R 2r)

(tR r)2 R(R 2r)
1

=

2
4Rr
(tR r) + R(R + 2r)
1
(tR r)2 + R(R + 2r)


n
(tR r)2 R(R 2r) X
4Rr

=
(tR r)2 + R(R + 2r)
(tR r)2 + R(R + 2r)
n=0

n

X
1
2Rr
2
n1

=
(tR r) R(R 2r)
2
.
2Rr
(tR r)2 + R(R + 2r)
n=1

Combining expression (3.4) and (3.11) we immediately get the inequalities (3.10), and the proof of
Corollary 3.3 is completed.

References
 J.C.Gerretsen. OngelijKheden in the Driehoek. Nieuw Tijdschr, Wisk, 41(1953). 17.
 D.S.Mitrinovic, J.E.Pecric and V.Volenec. Recent Advances in Geometric Inequalities. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989. 23.
 D. S. Mitrinovic, P.M.Vasic. Analytic Inequalities. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1970. 4445.
 Xue-zhi Yang. The proof of a class of trigonometric Inequalities, Mathematics Olympic, Hunan Education Press,
Hunan Education Press, Changsha, China, 19(1994).2440. (in Chinese).
(SH.-H. Wu) Department of Mathematics, Longyan College, Longyan, Fujian 364012, P.R.China