Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Issue: W/n Atty. Valdes should be administratively sanctioned for his acts, namely:
o Excluding the property in Baguio from the estate of Jose Nakpil;
o Including his loans as claims on the estate; and
o Apparently, representing conflicting interests when his accounting firm prepared
the list of claims of creditors Angel Nakpil and ENORN against the estate of Jose
Nakpil, which was represented by his law firm.
Held: The SC found Valdes guilty of misconduct and suspends him for 1 year.The
Court held that the first two acts clearly show that Valdes broke the trust reposed on
him by Imelda Nakpil when the latter agreed to use his professional services as a
lawyer and an accountant. It was clear that Jose Nakpil and Atty. Came to an
agreement that the latter would be buying the property in trust for Jose. By his act
of excluding the property from the estate and including the loans he contracted
(and used for his own benefit) as claims, Valdes took for granted the trust formed
between Jose
and him (they had a close relationship since the 50s), which was the basis for
Imeldas decision to use his services.