Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
APPELLANT
VERSUS
MEHTAAB
RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
Leave granted.
2.
3.
The deceased
conducted
the
dead
Post mortem
body
and
after
allegations
and
alleged
that
he
was
falsely
implicated.
4.
2
Page2
3
Page3
6.
7.
4
Page4
the society.
consider
the
aspect
Unfortunately,
these
of
rehabilitating
factors
are
the
victim.
missing
in
the
has
been
lost.
Award
of
unreasonable
5
Page5
9.
for the State, the accused Mehtaab has three sons and
he owns 10-12 bighas of land and his annual income
was Rs.35-40,000/-.
As per
6
Page6
to
10
days
without
awarding
any
the modification
that
the
accused will
pay
In such
7
Page7
...J.
[T.S. THAKUR]
....J.
[ ADARSH KUMAR GOEL ]
NEW DELHI
FEBRUARY 13, 2015
8
Page8