Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Aeronautical Engineering Department, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 3030, Irbid 22110, Jordan
Mechanical Engineering Department, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 3030, Irbid 22110, Jordan
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 4 March 2012
Accepted 29 April 2012
Available online 15 May 2012
This research investigates the in-plane stress concentration factor (SCF) in countersunk rivet holes in
orthotropic laminated plates under uniaxial tension load. Finite element analysis (FEA) using ANSYS
software is used to build and mesh the geometry of a plate containing a countersunk hole, dene the
boundary and loading conditions, run the analysis and obtain the SCF results. The effect of several
geometric and material parameters such as plate thickness, straight-shank radius, countersunk angle,
countersunk depth, plate width, and the laminate ply angles on the SCF is also investigated. Finally,
multi parameter t and factorial analyses are applied to establish the relationships between the SCF and
the various geometric and material parameters, and to formulate a general equation for the SCF. Based
on the results, it is found that the values of the SCF obtained by means of the formulated equation are
within 7% of the nite element (FE) results for 96% of the runs and that the maximum overall error is
less than 14%.
2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Countersunk hole
Stress concentration factor
Finite element analysis
Orthotropic plates
1. Introduction
In industrial applications, rivets are used to join components
that are made of isotropic or anisotropic materials. In contrast to
the isotropic materials, the mechanical, physical and thermal
properties of anisotropic materials such as brous composites are
directional, which complicates the stress analysis in the neighborhood of holes.
Numerous studies on the stress concentration of two dimensional (2-D) plates with circular holes subjected to several loading
types are reported in the literature and summarized by Pilkey and
Pilkey (2008). Three dimensional (3-D) FE results of the SCF were
presented by Shivakumar and Newman (1992) for plates with
circular straight-shank holes subjected to remote tension. The
results showed that the maximum SCF lies at the mid-thickness of
the isotropic plate and drops near the free surface. Wu and Mu
(2003) performed FEA on uniaxial and biaxial loaded isotropic
and orthotropic plates with circular holes and examined the SCF of
holes in a plate structures and pressure vessels. Kotousov and
Wang (2002) presented analytical solutions for (3-D) stress
70
Nomenclature
b
Cs
e
E
G
Kt
Kh,o
Kss,o
KCs,o
Kqc,o
r
t
w
x,y,z
1,2,3
n
qc
qp
so
the
the
the
the
G12 6.9 GPa, G23 3.7 GPa, G13 6.9 GPa, n12 0.27, n23 0.54 and
Kt
smax
so
(1)
71
3.90
Kt
3.88
3.86
3.84
3.82
Fig. 3. The meshed conguration of the quarter model with the boundary and loading
conditions.
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
r/e
Fig. 4. Mesh renement results.
Design Language (APDL). This code was used to dene the material
system, to generate the geometric model, the FE model and to run
the analysis of the problem. Only 3-D hexahedron elements,
specied as solid45 in ANSYS package, were chosen to generate the
mesh in the volumes through the strategic selection of the isoparametric mapping concept. In order to achieve accurate results
for the SCF in the neighborhood of the hole, mesh gradation was
engineered to produce a very ne mesh near the hole and course
mesh elsewhere as shown in Fig. 3.
A mesh renement study was also conducted to optimize the FE
solution. The geometric parameters associated with the mesh
renement study were as follows: t/r 2, Cs/t 0.4, l/r 15 and w/
r 15 at qc 100 . Five FE models with different mesh sizes were
considered for the mesh renement as shown in Table 1.
For each mesh level the maximum SCF (Kt) was obtained and
compared with the next ner mesh. The results of the study are
shown in Fig. 4. Apparently, the Kt value of model 3 with the radiusto-element size ratio at the hole (r/e 25.3) has reached
a convergence value with an error less than 0.01% from the
asymptote. This error is very small; accordingly model 3 was
considered throughout the analysis of the present FE model.
The boundary conditions of the quarter model were imposed by
constraining the x-displacement at x 0 and the y-displacement at
y 0 to account for the planes of symmetry of the full model. A
uniform remote tensile stress (so) was applied at the plane x l.
Fig. 3 shows the details of the boundary and loading conditions of
the quarter model.
In the FE model, the properties of the 8-plies of the orthotropic
angle ply laminate were homogenized. This type of homogenization only alters the normal-shear coupling terms and not the other
components. Therefore, the plate is treated as one thick ply with
homogenized orthotropic properties that depends on the ply angle.
The homogenization technique was found used in the literature by
many researchers including Whitney and Nuismer (1974), Pipes
Table 1
The mesh size specications of the ve FE models of the mesh renement study.
Model #
Number
of elements
Number of
nodes
Radius-to-element
size ratio at the hole (r/e)
1
2
3
4
5
1380
5100
25200
48960
144000
1848
6160
28158
53475
152971
12.7
19.0
25.3
38.0
44.3
et al. (1979), Tan (1987), Soutis and Hu (2000) and Darwish and
Shivakumar (2011).
3.2. Verication analysis
The verication analysis was performed by independently
generating FE models by means of the prescribed element type and
meshing procedures for certain cases in the literature and by
reproducing their results.
3.2.1. Thin innite orthotropic plate with a circular hole
The SCF values (KN) in an innite orthotropic plate with
a circular hole were obtained from the present FE model for
different material systems and different lay-ups and compared
with the results of Lekhnitskiis equation (1963) in Table 2.
It is shown in Table 2 that the FE results are in good agreement
with the results of Lekhnistkiis equation.
3.2.2. Thin nite orthotropic plate with a circular hole
Here, the values of the SCF (Kh,o) become function of the plates
width in addition to the materials orthotropy. The FE results of the
SCF versus the radius-to-width ratio are compared with the results
from Tans equation (1994). Fig. 5 presents the results of the
comparison.
It is shown in Fig. 5 that the FE results are in good agreement
with the results of Tans equation. In the next sections, FE and
formulation analyses will be conducted to obtain the maximum SCF
around countersunk holes in orthotropic plates.
Table 2
Comparison between KN from the FE results and Lekhnistkiis equation for thin
innite orthotropic plate with a central circular hole.
Material
Angle (qp)
FE Results
Lekhnistkii Equation
%Error
Aluminum
Carbon Epoxy
Isotropic
0
10
20
60
70
0
30
0
30
3.00
6.06
5.24
4.04
1.99
2.01
3.67
3.10
6.37
4.61
3.00
6.32
5.34
3.94
1.92
2.00
3.65
3.01
6.57
4.54
0.0
4.1
2.0
2.6
3.7
0.7
0.5
2.9
3.1
1.5
E-glass Epoxy
Carbon Polyimide
72
5.2
Table 3
Material parameter levels for factorial analysis.
5.0
4.8
ho
4.6
Material parameter
Low
High
Ex/Ey
Ex/Ez
Ex/Gxy
Ex/Gyz
Ex/Gxz
0.5
0.5
1.67
1.67
1.67
0.1
0.6
5.0
5.0
10
10
10
0.7
3.0
nxy
nyz/nxz
4.4
4.2
4.0
FE
Tan Eq.
3.8
3.6
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
r/w
Fig. 5. Comparison between the FE results and Tans equation.
(2)
where Kh,o, Kss,o, KCs,o and Kqc,o are dimensionless parameters that
account for the effect of the width of the plate, the thickness, the
countersink depth and the countersink angle respectively
combined with the effect of the material orthotropy on the value of
Kt. The subscript o indicates for an orthotropic plate.
4.1. Innite thin orthotropic plate with a hole
In the mechanics of isotropic materials, the SCF of an innite
thin plate with a circular hole is 3. This baseline value is not valid
when the plate is made of an orthotropic material due to its
directional properties. In the present study, the plate is made of
Carbon/Epoxy laminate with an orthotropic layup of [qp]2s. Here,
the ply angle, qp, is as a key parameter in determining the orthotropic mechanical properties of the plate and accordingly the
baseline value of the SCF at the hole (KN). To nd an expression for
KN in terms of the 9 orthotropic properties, 7 nondimensional
material parameters (Ex/Ey, Ex/Ez, Ex/Gxy, Ex/Gyz, Ex/Gxz, nxy, nyz/nxz)
were rst tested through factorial analysis to examine their inuence on the value of KN. Two levels, low and high, for each
nondimensional material parameter were chosen for this study as
listed in Table 3.
The values of the low and high levels were selected carefully to
cover a wide range of each material parameter. One hundred and
twenty eight ANSYS runs were performed at different combinations
of the nondimensional parameters for the geometry of w/r 15, t/
r 1, Cs/t 0.5 and qc 100 . The FE results from these runs were
analyzed through Minitab software. The factorial analysis was
performed, and the results are shown in Fig. 6.
It can be seen in Fig. 6 that among the 7 dimensionless material
parameters, only three parameters (Ex/Ey, Ex/Gxy and nxy) have
major effect on KN. The parameter Ex/Gxz is considered to have
a minor effect on KN while the remaining parameters nearly
have no effect on KN. Based on these results, it can be stated that
KN can be expressed in terms the planar 2-D properties (Ex, Ey,
Gxy and nxy) even though the analysis and geometry are three
dimensional.
A 2-D analytical equation for KN was derived by Lekhnitskii
(1963) for an innite thin orthotropic plate with a central hole,
this equation is shown below:
KN
v
#
u "s
u
E
E
x
x
nxy
1 t2
Ey
2Gxy
(3)
Kh;o
3 X
3
X
Aij
j0 i0
r i
w
j
KN
where:
a00
6 a01
Aij 6
4 a02
a03
a10
a11
a12
a13
a20
a21
a22
a23
3
a30
a31 7
7
a32 5
a33
(4)
73
0:00
6 1:00
6
Aij 4
0:00
0:00
0:11
1:00
0:09
0:01
14:04
12:41
1:84
0:02
3
15:75
20:39 7
7
3:10 5
0:06
(5)
8
4.0
7
3.5
p=30
FE
Equation (4)
h,o
3.0
K
h,o
FE
p=50
5
4
r/w=0.40
3
2.5
p=80
r/w=0.25
r/w=0.10
2.0
1
0
20
40
60
80
Ply angle p
Fig. 7. The effect of r/w and qp on Kh,o.
100
120
1.5
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
r/w
0.5
74
2.0
Kss,o
1.5
1.0
p = 10o
0.5
p = 20 o
p = 40
p = 60
0.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
t/r
%Error
direction (Ez, Gxz, Gyz, nxz and nyz) have a negligible effect on the
SCF.
In this section, the straight shank hole is modied to a countersunk hole which in fact adds a degree of complexity to the
analysis. Having a sinking depth through a portion of the hole
allows the stresses to ow through the thickness of the plate
around the hole. Therefore, the sinking depth represented by (Cs/t)
is expected to affect the value of Kt. Here comes the signicance of
formulating an expression for KCs,o that integrates the role of the
geometry of the countersunk hole and the material orthotropy in
determining the Kt value. Factorial analysis was performed to
determine the geometric parameters that directly affect the value
of KCs,o which can be obtained by dividing the Kt value from the FE
solution by Kh,o from Equation (4). The results of the factorial
analysis are shown in Fig. 10.
Here it can be stated that a formula for KCs,o must include r/w, t/r
and Cs/t in addition to KN. A general equation of KCs,o is expressed in
the form shown below:
KCs;0
100
(8)
Based on Table 4, it can be stated that the results of the developed equation of KCs,o match very well with the FE results.
4.5. Formulation of Kqc,o
b 1
b2 2
t
Cs
t
Cs
KN c1 a2
1 a1
KN c2
r
r
t
t
b3 d1
r d2
t
Cs
a3
KN c3
t
r
w
Kt;eq Kt;FE
Kt;FE
Kqc;o 1 m qc 100
m At=rl1 KN l2
0:45
0:74 2
t
Cs
t
Cs
KN 1:14 0:03
KCs;0 10:16
KN 1:87
t
t
r
r
1:65 1:47
r 1:77
t
Cs
1:76
KN 0:56
7
t
r
w
A comparison between the FE results of KCs,o and Equation (7) at
different geometric congurations and different ply angles is
shown in Table 4.
(10)
(9)
2
Cs
Cs
Cs
0:008
0:01
0:015
t
t
t
(11)
Table 4
Comparison between KCs,o from Equation (7) and FE.
r/w
t/r 1
KCs,o
FE
t/r 2
KCs,o
Eq. (7)
Cs/t 0.1, qp 0
0.1
1.122 1.122
0.25 1.136 1.132
0.4
1.137 1.134
Cs/t 0.25, qp 45
0.1
1.120 1.084
0.25 1.135 1.095
0.4
1.136 1.112
Cs/t 0.50, qp 80
0.1
1.126 1.171
0.25 1.166 1.200
0.4
1.251 1.245
t/r 4
%Error
KCs,o
FE
KCs,o
Eq. (7)
%Error
KCs,o
FE
KCs,o
Eq. (7)
%Error
0.0
0.4
0.3
1.168
1.181
1.187
1.164
1.169
1.176
0.3
1.0
0.9
1.213
1.229
1.239
1.222
1.236
1.241
0.8
0.5
0.2
3.2
3.5
1.9
1.175
1.203
1.237
1.148
1.155
1.206
2.3
4.2
3.8
1.253
1.319
e
1.192
1.278
e
4.9
3.1
e
4.0
2.8
0.5
1.205
1.293
e
1.236
1.325
e
2.6
2.5
1.333
1.590
e
1.345
1.622
e
0.9
2.0
75
Table 5
Comparison between Kqc,o from Equation (9) and FE at r/w 0. 1, t/r 2 and qp 40 .
qc
Cs/t 0.1
80
90
100
110
120
Cs/t 0.25
Cs/t 0.5
Kqc,o FE
%Error
Kqc,o FE
%Error
Kqc,o FE
%Error
0.9815
0.9910
1.0000
1.0106
1.0215
0.9777
0.9888
1.0000
1.0112
1.0223
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.9651
0.9829
1.0000
1.0220
1.0429
0.9489
0.9744
1.0000
1.0256
1.0511
1.7
0.9
0.0
0.4
0.8
0.9465
0.9734
1.0000
1.0356
1.0725
0.9438
0.9719
1.0000
1.0281
1.0562
0.3
0.2
0.0
0.7
1.5
l1
2
Cs
Cs
Cs
4:8
6
10:7
t
t
t
(12)
l2
2
Cs
Cs
Cs
0:6
0:9
1
t
t
t
(13)
10
9
FE
Equation (5)
FE
Equation (5)
7
5
Kt
Kt
4
3
2
1
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Ply angle p
70
80
90
100
Fig. 11. The stress concentration factor Kt versus ply angle qp (t/r 1, Cs/t 0.5, r/
w 0).
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Ply angle p
Fig. 12. The stress concentration factor Kt versus ply angle qp (t/r 4, Cs/t 0.1, r/
w 0).
76
10
Table 6
Comparison between Kt from Equation (5) and FE at Cs/t 0. 25 and t/r 1.
qp qc 80
qc 100
7.85
6.41
4.49
3.14
2.31
1.99
2.01
2.10
2.34
2.58
6.8
2.6
1.6
3.4
13.5
10.5
0.0
1.2
0.4
0.8
7.71
6.52
4.71
3.33
2.75
2.29
2.02
2.10
2.36
2.61
8.02
6.55
4.6
3.23
2.37
2.05
2.07
2.16
2.41
2.65
3.9
0.5
2.4
3.0
13.5
10.4
2.2
2.9
2.2
1.6
8.03
6.82
4.89
3.43
2.83
2.35
2.06
2.13
2.41
2.7
8.18
6.69
4.70
3.31
2.44
2.10
2.13
2.22
2.48
2.72
1.8
1.9
3.9
3.5
13.8
10.3
3.5
4.2
2.8
0.7
r/w = 0.25
8
Kt
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
FE
Equation (5)
qc 120
r/w = 0.1
7
5
0
t/r
Fig. 14. The stress concentration factor Kt versus t/r (Cs/t 0.1, qc 110 and qp 0 ).
12
10
r/w = 0.25
FE
Equation (5)
11
Cs /t = 0.5
FE
Equation (5)
10
r/w = 0.1
8
Kt
Kt
9
8
Cs /t = 0.1
7
6
6
5
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
r/w
Fig. 13. The stress concentration factor Kt versus r/w (t/r 1, qc 90 and qp 0 ).
5
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
Cs/t
0.4
0.5
0.6
Fig. 15. The stress concentration factor Kt versus Cs/t (t/r 1, qc 100 and qp 0 ).
10
77
4.0
FE
Equation (5)
3.5
9
3.0
Cs /t = 0.25
2.5
K FE
Kt
Emax= 3.5%
7
Cs /t = 0.1
2.0
1.5
1.0
Cs/t = 0.10
Cs/t = 0.25
Cs/t = 0.50
6
0.5
0.0
5
90
100
110
Countersink angle c
120
0.0
130
Fig. 16. The stress concentration factor Kt versus the countersink angle (qc) (r/w 0.1,
t/r 1 and qp 0 ).
increasing (qp) gradually from 0 (bers parallel to the load direction) to 90 (bers perpendicular to the load direction), the
modulus in the load direction Ex decreases from maximum to
minimum and the lateral modulus Ey increases from minimum to
maximum. This change in the mechanical properties reduces the
concentration of the axial stresses (sx) at the sides of the hole. In
addition, the in-plane shear modulus and Poisons ratio, Gxy and nxy,
reach their peak values at 45-degrees and near 25-degrees
respectively which also affect the Kt vs. the ply angle distribution.
On the other hand, for xed r/w, stiffening the lateral direction of
the plate increases the edge effect, or in other words, the width at
which the plate becomes innite increases. In summary of this
point, increasing qp from 0 to 90 , the SCF decreases due to the
change of the mechanical properties of the plate, and on the other
hand increases due to the increasing edge effect. This counteract
effect is responsible for the descending-ascending trend of the Kt
versus qp curve.
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
z/t
Fig. 18. Stress concentration factor variation through the thickness of the hole (r/
w 0.1, t/r 1 and qc 100 ).
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
c = 80
c = 100o
0.5
c = 120o
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
z/t
10
9
Fig. 19. Stress concentration factor variation through the thickness of the hole (r/
w 0.1, t/r 1 and Cs/t 0.25).
FE
Equation (5)
At the end of the discussion, it can be stated that the SCF can be
minimized by selecting small values of (r/w, t/r, Cs/t and qc) and a ply
angle between 50 and 60 for the orthotropic laminate. The
minimum Kt value obtained in this study was 1.983 for an innite
plate with r/w 0, t/r 1, Cs/t 0.1, qc 80 and qp 60 .
7
6
Kt
0.2
80
K FE
70
5
4
6. Conclusions
r/w = 0.25
3
2
r/w = 0.1
1
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Ply angle p
Fig. 17. The stress concentration factor Kt versus the ply angle (Cs/t 0.25, t/r 1 and
qc 100 ).
78
Kotousov, A., Lazzarin, P., Berto, F., Harding, S., 2010. Effect of the thickness on
elastic deformation and quasi-brittle fracture of plate components. Engineering
Fracture Mechanics 39, 4311e4326.
Kotousov, A., Wang, C.H., 2002. Three-dimensional stress constraint in an elastic
plate with a notch. International Journal of Solids and Structures 77,
1665e1681.
Li, Z., Guo, W., Kuang, Z., 2000. Three-dimensional elastic stress elds near notches
in nite thickness plates. International Journal of Solids and Structures 37,
7617e7631.
Lekhnitskii, S.G., 1963. Theory of Elasticity of an Anisotropic Elastic Body, rst ed.
Holden-Day, San Francisco.
Montgomery, D.C., Runger, G.C., 2006. Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers, fourth ed. John Wiley & Sons.
Montgomery, D.C., 2000. Design and Analysis of Experiments, fth ed. John Wiley &
Sons Inc.
Pilkey, W.D., Pilkey, D.F., 2008. Petersons Stress Concentration Factors, third ed.
John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Pipes, R.B., Wetherhold, R.C., Gillespie JR, J.W., 1979. Notched strength of composite
materials. Journal of Composite Materials 13 (2), 148e160.
Potti, P.K. Govindan, Rao, B. Nageswara, Srivastave, V.K., 1999. Notched strength of
carbon bre/epoxy composite laminates with a circular hole. Forschung Im
Ingenieurwesen 65 (7), 295e300.
Raghavan, B.V., Raju, K.S., 2009. Tensile stress concentration due to counter sunk
holes in adhesively bonded layered aluminum. Proceedings of the 5th Annual
GRASP symposium, Wichita, USA.
She, C., Guo, W., 2007. Three-dimensional stress concentrations at elliptic holes in
elastic isotropic plates subjected to tensile stress. International Journal of
Fatigue 29, 330e335.
Shivakumar, K.N., Bhargava, A., Hamoush, S., 2007. A general equation for stress
concentration in countersunk holes. CMC 6 (2), 71e92.
Shivakumar, K.N., Newman, J.C., 1992. Stress Concentrations for Straight-shank and
Countersunk Holes in Plates Subjected to Tension, Bending, and Pin Loading.
NASA Technical Paper 3192.
Soutis, C., Hu, F.Z., 2000. Failure analysis of scarf-patch-repaired carbon ber/epoxy
laminates under compression. AIAA Journal 38 (4), 737e740.
Tan, S.C., 1987. Laminated composites containing an elliptical opening. I. approximate stress analysis and fracture models. Journal of Composite Materials 21
(10), 925e948.
Tan, S.C., 1994. Stress Concentrations in Laminated Composites. Technomic
Publishing Co., Lancaster, PA.
Toubal, L., Karama, M., Lorrain, B., 2005. Stress concentration in a circular hole in
composite plate. Composite Structures 68, 31e36.
Wharely, R.E., 1965. Stress-concentration factors for countersunk holes. Experimental Mechanics 5 (8), 257e261.
Whitney, J.M., Nuismer, R.J., 1974. Stress fracture criteria for laminated composites
containing stress concentrations. Journal of Composite Materials 8, 253e265.
Wu, H., Mu, B., 2003. On stress concentrations for isotropic/orthotropic plates and
cylinders with a circular hole. Composites: Part B 34 (2), 127e134.