Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
com/lottery/l
otto-tips-strategies/
http://oeis.org/wiki/Welcome#Some_
Famous_Sequences
GameBelgium Method
Hi people,
New poster. Tx to Admin for registering me and providing access.
I saw a method by GameBelgium with regards to selecting lines from the last 20
draws with no matches which peaked my interest. In it he was trying to select 6
lines which will have no matches in the next draw, and I thought it should be
easier as a starting point to select just 3 lines thus eliminating up to 15 numbers
(in our 5/45 game) and up to 18 numbers (in the 6/49 game). The number of
lines out in the 5/45 game for the last 10 draws were:
13,11,8,8,10,15,6,12,13,12, so between 6 and 15 lines with no matches at an
average of about 10 lines with no matches. Any ideas/suggestions on how to
choose 3 lines from the approximately 10 lines that won't have any matches?
Thanks
#2
11-09-2013, 11:05 AM
Icewynd
Registered User
Hey Ramijami,
#3
11-10-2013, 10:30 AM
Ramijami
Registered User
Thanks Icewynd. Exploring the concept as a 3/20 game and using high/low, odd
even filters etc. to get a possible strategy. So far the best I'm doing is getting a
match in 5 or more sets. Trying to get a match consistently in 1-3 sets max. The
last few draws have eliminated 11-15 numbers in the 6/45, and 12-18 numbers in
the 6/49.
#4
11-10-2013, 11:13 AM
Icewynd
Registered User
Quote:
Hi Ramijami,
Not sure what you mean by 3/20 game -- are you trying to eliminate all but 20
numbers and hoping for a 3 match?
You might try searching this forum for "filters". I know PAB had a thread a while
back on this board than explored a large number of ways to filter the numbers.
Good luck!
#5
11-10-2013, 11:46 AM
Ramijami
Registered User
Hi Icewynd,
By 3/20 I mean choosing 3 lines of the 20 which I think won't have any matches
#6
11-10-2013, 12:01 PM
Icewynd
Registered User
#7
11-19-2013, 07:30 AM
GameBelgium
Registered User
Hi Ramijami
Picking 3 lines from 20 will give you a reduced amount of numbers to play. It will
probably give you 13 to 15 numbers which you should not play in the next draw.
However, in most cases, that will be all it gives you. If you want to use the
information to further eliminate numbers and provide you with a limited pool of
numbers containing the winning numbers, you will need to select more lines (if
you think this through, it makes perfect sense, doesn't it?). I applied the principle
to Euro Millions (a 5/50 lottery) and if I remember correctly, on average, 13 (!)
lines from the last 20 draws contained no matches.
Anyway, let us know how you do and if you're succesful in selecting the 3 lines
correctly on a regular basis, please share how you got there, and maybe we can
make it a work in progress.
Best of luck!
#8
11-19-2013, 10:07 PM
Join Date: May 2003
TheWasp
Posts: 5
Registered User
In my 649 lotto, I've found that typically there will be 23 lines from the last 72
draws that will not have the numbers that show in the next draw. This can vary
from a low of 17 to a high of 27 and not always will it just be the next 7 numbers,
it could be as many as 10. Of course, generating this set will produce a lot of
numbers that qualify and I've found that one needs to include some other info
about the last numbers to make it work to some degree of reliability.
#9
11-20-2013, 12:25 PM
Icewynd
Registered User
or 3 sets of numbers that will have one or two matches with the upcoming draw
while 12 (2X6) or 18(3X6) numbers will be successfully deleted.
Only about 6% of the time you could delete the last 5 games and have only one
game with a match (most often 1 match of six).
Good luck!
Hello Pab:
You are the teacher, not I, but Ill try to help.
I think that the way would be something like that:
1 -Go to the page of all the series:
http: // oeis.org/wiki/Index_to_OEIS: _
Section_Se*sequences_which_agree_for_a_long_time
2 -We search in the the thousands of possible series the one that we are
interested for our game.
For example. A002048:
The serie it consists these numbers between 1 and 49:
1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 10, 14, 15, 16, 21, 22, 25, 26, 28, 33, 34, 35, 36, 38, 40, 42, 46, 48,
49
3 -Now is when you can analize how many numbers of this serie, they appear
normally in every combination.
This page has thousands of possible filters (so many as series), because of it I said
you that there is a lot of information with possibilities of being applied.
Regards
Hints
Search
This is also the Horadam sequence (0,1,1,1). - Ross La Haye, Aug 18 2003
An INVERT transform of A019590. INVERT([1,1,2,3,5,8,...]) gives A000129.
INVERT([1,2,3,5,8,13,21,...]) gives A028859. - Antti Karttunen, Dec 12 2003
Number of meaningful differential operations of the k-th order on the space R^3.
Mar 11 2003
Number of order ideals of the "zig-zag" poset. See vol. 1, ch. 3, prob. 23 of
Stanley. - Mitch Harris, Dec 27 2005
F(n+1)/F(n) is also the Farey fraction sequence (see A097545 for explanation) for the
golden ratio, which is the only number whose Farey fractions and continued
fractions are the same. - Joshua Zucker, May 08 2006
a(n+2) is the number of paths through 2 plates of glass with n reflections
(reflections occurring at plate/plate or plate/air interfaces). Cf. A006356A006359. - Mitch Harris, Jul 06 2006
F(n+1) equals the number of downsets (i.e., decreasing subsets) of an n-element
fence, i.e., an ordered set of height 1 on {1,2,...,n} with 1 > 2 < 3 > 4 < ... n
and no other comparabilities. Alternatively, F(n+1) equals the number of subsets A
of {1,2,...,n} with the property that, if an odd k is in A, then the adjacent
elements of {1,2,...,n} belong to A, i.e., both k - 1 and k + 1 are in A (provided
they are in {1,2,...,n}). - Brian Davey, Aug 25 2006
Number of Kekule structures in polyphenanthrenes. See the paper by Lukovits and
Janezic for details. - Parthasarathy Nambi, Aug 22 2006
Inverse: With phi = (sqrt(5) + 1)/2, round(log_phi(sqrt((sqrt(5) a(n) + sqrt(5 a(n)^2
- 4))(sqrt(5) a(n) + sqrt(5 a(n)^2 + 4)))/2)) = n for n >= 3, obtained by rounding
the arithmetic mean of the inverses given in A001519 and A001906. - David W.
Cantrell (DWCantrell(AT)sigmaxi.net), Feb 19 2007
A result of Jacobi from 1848 states that every symmetric matrix over a p.i.d. is
congruent to a triple-diagonal matrix. Consider the maximal number T(n) of summands
in the determinant of an n X n triple-diagonal matrix. This is the same as the
number of summands in such a determinant in which the main-, sub- and superdiagonal elements are all nonzero. By expanding on the first row we see that the
sequence of T(n)'s is the Fibonacci sequence without the initial stammer on the
1's. - Larry Gerstein (gerstein(AT)math.ucsb.edu), Mar 30 2007
Suppose psi=log(phi). We get the representation F(n)=(2/sqrt(5))*sinh(n*psi) if n is
even; F(n)=(2/sqrt(5))*cosh(n*psi) if n is odd. There is a similar representation
for Lucas numbers (A000032). Many Fibonacci formulas now easily follow from
appropriate sinh- and cosh-formulas. For example: the de Moivre theorem (cosh(x)
+sinh(x))^m=cosh(mx)+sinh(mx) produces L(n)^2+5F(n)^2=2L(2n) and L(n)F(n)=F(2n)
(setting x=n*psi and m=2). - Hieronymus Fischer, Apr 18 2007
Inverse: floor(log_phi(sqrt(5)*Fib(n))+0.5)=n, for n>1. Also for n>0,
floor(1/2*log_phi(5*Fib(n)*Fib(n+1)))=n. Extension valid for integer n, except
n=0,-1: floor(1/2*sign(Fib(n)*Fib(n+1))*log_phi|5*Fib(n)*Fib(n+1)|)=n (where
sign(x) = sign of x). - Hieronymus Fischer, May 02 2007
F(n+2) = The number of Khalimsky-continuous functions with a two-point codomain. Shiva Samieinia (shiva(AT)math.su.se), Oct 04 2007
From Kauffman and Lopes, Proposition 8.2, p. 21: "The sequence of the determinants of
the Fibonacci sequence of rational knots is the Fibonacci sequence (of numbers)."
Jonathan Vos Post, Oct 26 2007
This is a_1(n) in the Doroslovacki reference.
Let phi = 1.6180339...; then phi^n = (1/phi)*a(n) + a(n+1). Example: phi^4 =
6.8541019...= (.6180339...)*3 + 5. Also phi = 1/1 + 1/2 + 1/(2*5) + 1/(5*13) + 1/
(13*34) + 1/(34*89),... - Gary W. Adamson, Dec 15 2007
The sequence of first differences, fib(n+1)-fib(n), is essentially the same sequence:
1, 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, ... - Colm Mulcahy, Mar 03 2008
a(n)= the number of different ways to run up a staircase with n steps, taking steps
of odd sizes where the order is relevant and there is no other restriction on the
number or the size of each step taken. - Mohammad K. Azarian, May 21 2008
Equals row sums of triangle A144152. - Gary W. Adamson, Sep 12 2008
Except for the initial term, the numerator of the convergents to the recursion x = 1/
(x+1). - Cino Hilliard, Sep 15 2008
F(n) is the number of possible binary sequences of length n that obey the sequential
construction rule: if last symbol is 0, add the complement (1); else add 0 or 1.
Here 0,1 are metasymbols for any 2-valued symbol set. This rule has obvious
similarities to JFJ Laros's rule, but is based on addition rather than substitution
and creates a tree rather than a single sequence. - Ross Drewe, Oct 05 2008
F(n) = PRODUCT_{k=1, (n-1)/2} (1 + 4*cos^2 k*Pi/n); where terms = roots to the
Fibonacci product polynomials, A152063. - Gary W. Adamson, Nov 22 2008
Fp == 5^((p-1)/2) mod p, p = prime; [Schroeder, p. 90]. - Gary W. Adamson &Alexander
R. Povolotsky, Feb 21 2009
(Ln)^2 - 5*(Fn)^2 = 4*(-1)^n. Example: 11^2 - 5*5 = -4. - Gary W. Adamson, Mar 11
"Even the Fibonacci sequence - 1,1,2,3,5,8,13 - follows Benford's law." See Pickover.
F(n) = round(phi* F(n-1)) for n>1. - Joseph P. Shoulak, Jan 13 2012
For n > 0: a(n) = length of n-th row in Wythoff array A003603. - Reinhard Zumkeller
Jan 26 2012
Bridget Tenner, Feb 22, 2012: (Start)
The number of free permutations of [n].
The number of permutations of [n] for which s_k in supp(w) implies s_{k+-1} not in
supp(w).
The number of permutations of [n] in which every decomposition into length(w)
reflections is actually composed of simple reflections. (End)
The sequence F(n+1)^(1/n) is increasing. The sequence F(n+2)^(1/n) is decreasing.
Thomas Ordowski, Apr 19 2012
Two conjectures: For n > 1, F(n+2)^2 mod F(n+1)^2 = F(n)*F(n+1) - (-1)^n. For n > 0,
(F(2n) + F(2n+2))^2 = F(4n+3) + sum_{k = 2..2n}F(2k). - Alex Ratushnyak, May 06
+ (-1)^n =
G. Mantel, Resten van wederkeerige Reeksen, Nieuw Archief v. Wiskunde, 2nd series, I
(1894), 172-184.
A. Milicevic and N. Trinajstic, "Combinatorial Enumeration in Chemistry", Chem.
Modell., Vol. 4, (2006), pp. 405-469.
Ram Krishna Pandey, "On Some Magnified Fibonacci Numbers Modulo a Lucas Number",
Journal of Integer Sequences, Vol. 16 (2013), #13.1.7.
Clifford A. Pickover, A Passion for Mathematics, Wiley, 2005; see p. 49.
Clifford A. Pickover, The Math Book, From Pythagoras to the 57th Dimension, 250
Milestones in the History of Mathematics, Sterling Publ., NY, 2009, page 274.
A. S. Posamentier & I. Lehmann, The Fabulous Fibonacci Numbers, Prometheus Books,
Amherst, NY 2007.
P. Ribenboim, The New Book of Prime Number Records, Springer, 1996.
J. Riordan, An Introduction to Combinatorial Analysis, Princeton University Press,
Princeton, NJ, 1978.
A. M. Robert, A Course in p-adic Analysis, Springer-Verlag, 2000; p. 213.
J. Roberts, Lure of the Integers, Math. Assoc. America, 1992, p. 288.
A. Sapounakis, I. Tasoulas and P. Tsikouras, On the Dominance Partial Ordering of
Dyck Paths, Journal of Integer Sequences, Vol. 9 (2006), Article 06.2.5.
Manfred R. Schroeder, "Number Theory in Science and Communication", 5th ed.,
Springer-Verlag, 2009
Mark A. Shattuck, Tiling proofs of some formulas for the Pell numbers of odd index,
Integers, 9 (2009), 53-64.
Simson, [No first name given], An explanation of an obscure passage in Albert
Girard's Commentary ..., Phil. Trans. Royal Soc., 10 (1753), 430-433.
N. J. A. Sloane, A Handbook of Integer Sequences, Academic Press, 1973 (includes this
sequence).
N. J. A. Sloane and Simon Plouffe, The Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, Academic
Press, 1995 (includes this sequence).
S. Vajda, Fibonacci and Lucas numbers and the Golden Section, Ellis Horwood Ltd.,
Chichester, 1989.
N. N. Vorob'ev, Chisla fibonachchi [Russian], Moscow, 1951. English translation,
Fibonacci Numbers, Blaisdell, New York and London, 1961.
N. J. A. Sloane, The first 2000 Fibonacci numbers: Table of n, F(n) for n = 0..2000
Amazing Mathematical Object Factory, Information on the Fibonacci sequences
M. Anderson et al., The Fibonacci Series
Matt Anderson, Jeffrey Frazier and Kris Popendorf, The Fibonacci series: the
successor formula
Matt Anderson, Jeffrey Frazier and Kris Popendorf, The Fibonacci series: the section
index
P. G. Anderson, Fibonacci Facts
Joerg Arndt, Matters Computational (The Fxtbook)
J.-L. Baril, Classical sequences revisited with permutations avoiding dotted pattern
Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, 18 (2011), #P178.
Paul Barry, A Catalan Transform and Related Transformations on Integer Sequences
Journal of Integer Sequences, Vol. 8 (2005), Article 05.4.5.
Paul Barry, On Integer-Sequence-Based Constructions of Generalized Pascal Triangles
Journal of Integer Sequences, Vol. 9 (2006), Article 06.2.4.
J. Bodeen, S. Butler, T. Kim, X. Sun, S. Wang, Tiling a strip with triangles, El. J.
Combinat. 21 (1) (2014) P1.7
H. Bottomley and N. J. A. Sloane, Illustration of initial terms: the Fibonacci tree
Brantacan, Fibonacci Numbers
J. Britton & B. V. Eeckhout, Fibonacci Interactive
N. D. Cahill, J. R. D'Errico, J. P. Spence, Complex factorizations of the Fibonacci
and Lucas numbers, Fib. Quart. 41 (2003) 13
C. K. Caldwell, The Prime Glossary, Fibonacci number
P. J. Cameron, Sequences realized by oligomorphic permutation groups, J. Integ. Seqs.
G.f.: x / (1 - x - x^2).
G.f.: Sum_{n>=0} x^n * Product_{k=1..n} (k + x)/(1 + k*x). - Paul D. Hanna, Oct 26
F(n) = ((1+sqrt(5))^n-(1-sqrt(5))^n)/(2^n*sqrt(5)).
Alternatively, F(n) = ((1/2+sqrt(5)/2)^n-(1/2-sqrt(5)/2)^n)/sqrt(5).
F(n) = F(n-1) + F(n-2) = -(-1)^n F(-n).
F(n) = round(phi^n/sqrt(5)).
F(n+1) = Sum(0 <= j <= [n/2]; binomial(n-j, j)).
This is a divisibility sequence; that is, if n divides m, then a(n) divides a(m).
Michael Somos, Apr 07 2012
E.g.f.: (2/sqrt(5))*exp(x/2)*sinh(sqrt(5)*x/2). - Len Smiley
(smiley(AT)math.uaa.alaska.edu), Nov 30 2001
[0 1; 1 1]^n [0 1] = [F(n); F(n+1)]
x | F(n) ==> x | F(kn).
A sufficient condition for F(m) to be divisible by a prime p is (p - 1) divides m, if
p == 1 or 4 (mod 5); (p + 1) divides m, if p == 2 or 3 (mod 5); or 5 divides m, if
For x > Phi, Sum n=0..inf F(n)/x^n = x/(x^2 - x - 1) - Gerald McGarvey, Oct 27 2004
F(n+1) = exponent of the n-th term in the series f(x, 1) determined by the equation
f(x, y) = xy + f(xy, x). - Jonathan Sondow, Dec 19 2004
a(n-1)=sum(k=0, n, (-1)^k*binomial(n-ceil(k/2), floor(k/2))). - Benoit Cloitre, May
05 2005
F(n+1)=sum{k=0..n, binomial((n+k)/2, (n-k)/2)(1+(-1)^(n-k))/2}. - Paul Barry, Aug 28
For n>m, the sum of the 2m consecutive Fibonacci numbers F(n-m-1) thru F(n+m-2) is
F(n)*L(m) if m is odd, and L(n)*F(m) if m is even (see the McRae link). - Graeme
McRae, Apr 24 2014.
Fib(n)=b(n)+(p-1)*sum{1<k<n, floor(b(k)/p)*Fib(n-k+1)} where b(k) is the digital sum
analogue of the Fibonacci recurrence, defined by b(k)=ds_p(b(k-1))+ds_p(b(k-2)),
b(0)=0, b(1)=1, ds_p=digital sum base p. Example for base p=10: Fib(n)=A010077
+9*sum{1<k<n, A059995(A010077(k))*Fib(n-k+1)}. - Hieronymus Fischer, Jul 01 2007
Fib(n)=b(n)+p*sum{1<k<n, floor(b(k)/p)*Fib(n-k+1)} where b(k) is the digital product
analogue of the Fibonacci recurrence, defined by b(k)=dp_p(b(k-1))+dp_p(b(k-2)),
b(0)=0, b(1)=1, dp_p=digital product base p. Example for base p=10:
Fib(n)=A074867(n)+10*sum{1<k<n, A059995(A074867(k))*Fib(n-k+1)}. -Hieronymus
Fischer, Jul 01 2007
a(n) = denominator of continued fraction [1,1,1,...] (with n ones); e.g., 2/3 =
continued fraction [1,1,1]; where barover[1] = [1,1,1...] = .6180339.... - Gary W.
Adamson, Nov 29 2007
F(n + 3) = 2F(n + 2) - F(n), F(n + 4) = 3F(n + 2) - F(n), F(n + 8) = 7F(n + 4) F(n), F(n + 12) = 18F(n + 6) - F(n). - Paul Curtz, Feb 01 2008
1 = 1/(1*2) + 1/(1*3) + 1/(2*5) + 1/(3*8) + 1/(5*13) + ... = 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/10 + 1/24
+ 1/65 + 1/168 + ...; where A059929 = (0, 2, 3, 10, 24, 65, 168,...). - Gary W.
Adamson, Mar 16 2008
a(2^n) = prod{i=0}^{n-2}B(i) where B(i) is A001566. Example 3*7*47 = Fib(16).
Kenneth J Ramsey, Apr 23 2008
F(n) = (1/(n-1)!) * [ n^(n-1) - { C(n-2,0) +4*C(n-2,1) +3*C(n-2,2) }*n^(n-2) +
{ 10*C(n-3,0) +49*C(n-3,1) +95*C(n-3,2) +83*C(n-3,3) +27*C(n-3,4) }*n^(n-3) { 90*C(n-4,0) +740*C(n-4,1) +2415*C(n-4,2) +4110*C(n-4,3) +3890*C(n-4,4) +1950*C(n4,5) +405*C(n-4,6) }*n^(n-4) + ... ]. - Andr F. Labossire, Nov 24 2004
a(n+1)=Sum_{k, 0<=k<=n} A109466(n,k)*(-1)^(n-k). [Philippe Delham, Oct 26 2008]
Formula from Thomas Wieder, Feb 25 2009:
a(n) = sum_{l_1=0}^{n+1} sum_{l_2=0}^{n}...sum_{l_i=0}^{n-i}...sum_{l_n=0}^{1}
delta(l_1,l_2,...,l_i,...,l_n)
where delta(l_1,l_2,...,l_i,...,l_n) = 0 if any l_i + l_(i+1) >= 2 for i=1..n-1
and delta(l_1,l_2,...,l_i,...,l_n) = 1 otherwise.
2^n (\prod _{k=1}^n \sqrt[4]{\cos^2(k\pi/(n+1))+1/4})^2 (Kasteleyn's formula
specialized). - Sarah-Marie Belcastro (smbelcas(AT)toroidalsnark.net), Jul 04 2009
a(n+1) =sum_{k=floor[n/2] mod 5} C(n,k) - sum_{k=floor[(n+5)/2] mod 5} C(n,k)
A173125(n)-A173126(n) =|A054877(n)-A052964(n-1)|. - Henry Bottomley, Feb 10 2010
If p[i]=modp(i,2) and if A is Hessenberg matrix of order n defined by: A[i,j]=p[ji+1], (i<=j), A[i,j]=-1, (i=j+1), and A[i,j]=0 otherwise. Then, for n>=1, a(n)=det
Milan Janjic, May 02 2010
Limit(F(k+n)/F(k), k = infinity) = (L(n) + F(n)*sqrt(5))/2 with the Lucas numbers
Since S(j,n) = binomial(n-2+j,j-1), the formula above equals the well-known binomial
formula, essentially.
For x = 0,1,2,3,4, x=1/(x+1) = 1, 1/2, 2/3, 3/5, 5/8. These fractions have numerators
1,1,2,3,5, which are the 2nd to 6th entries in the sequence. - Cino Hilliard, Sep
15 2008
Joerg Arndt, May 21 2013: (Start)
There are a(7)=13 compositions of 7 where there is a drop between every second pair
of parts, starting with the first and second part:
[ 2 1 2 1 1 ]
[ 2 1 3 1 ]
[ 2 1 4 ]
[ 3 1 2 1 ]
[ 3 1 3 ]
[ 3 2 2 ]
[ 4 1 2 ]
[ 4 2 1 ]
[ 4 3 ]
[ 5 1 1 ]
[ 5 2 ]
[ 6 1 ]
[ 7 ]
There are abs(a(6+1))=13 compositions of 6 where there is no rise between every
second pair of parts, starting with the second and third part:
[ 1 2 1 2 ]
[ 1 3 1 1 ]
[ 1 3 2 ]
[ 1 4 1 ]
[ 1 5 ]
[ 2 2 1 1 ]
[ 2 3 1 ]
[ 2 4 ]
[ 3 2 1 ]
[ 3 3 ]
[ 4 2 ]
[ 5 1 ]
[ 6 ]
f = fib()
a = [f.next() for i in range(100)]
A000045(n):
... """ Returns Fibonacci number with index n, offset 0, 4 """
... return a[n]
................
A000045_list(N):
... """ Returns a list of the first n Fibonacci numbers """
... return a[:N]
core,nonn,nice,easy,hear
approved
Search
Hints
A026300
Motzkin triangle, T, read by rows; T(0,0) = T(1,0) = T(1,1) = 1; for n >= 2, T(n,0) = 1,
T(n,k) = T(n-1,k-2) + T(n-1,k-1) + T(n-1,k) for k = 1,2,...,n-1 and T(n,n) = T(n-1,n-2) +
T(n-1,n-1).
0,5
COMMENTS
3
9
T(n, k)=Sum(i=0, Floor(k/2), binomial(n, 2i+n-k)[binomial(2i+n-k, i)binomial(2i+n-k, i-1)]) - Herbert Kociemba, May 27 2004
T(n, k) = A027907(n, k) - A027907(n, k-2), k<=n.
Sum_{k, 0<=k<=n}(-1)^k*T(n,k)=A099323(n+1) . - Philippe Delham, Mar 19
2007
Sum(T(n,k) mod 2, 0<=k<=n) = A097357(n+1) . - Philippe Delham, Apr 28
2007
Sum_{k, 0<=k<=n} T(n,k)*x^(nk)= A005043(n), A001006(n), A005773(n+1), A059738(n) for x = -1, 0, 1, 2
respectively. [From Philippe Delham, Nov 28 2009]
EXAMPLE
1;
1,1;
1,2,2;
1,3,5,4;
1,4,9,12,9;
1,5,14,25,30,21;
...
MAPLE
A026300 := proc(n, k)
add(binomial(n, 2*i+n-k)*(binomial(2*i+n-k, i) -binomial(2*i+n-k, i1)) , i=0..floor(k/2)) ;
end proc: # R. J. Mathar, Jun 30 2013
MATHEMATICA
t[n_, k_] := Sum[ Binomial[n, 2i + n - k] (Binomial[2i + n - k, i] Binomial[2i + n - k, i - 1]), {i, 0, Floor[k/2]}]; Table[ t[n, k], {n,
0, 10}, {k, 0, n}] // Flatten (* Robert G. Wilson v, Jan 03 2011 *)
t[_, 0] = 1; t[n_, 1] := n; t[n_, k_] /; k>n || k<0 = 0; t[n_, n_] := t[n,
n] = t[n-1, n-2]+t[n-1, n-1]; t[n_, k_] := t[n, k] = t[n-1, k-2]+t[n-1,
k-1]+t[n-1, k]; Table[t[n, k], {n, 0, 10}, {k, 0, n}] // Flatten
(* Jean-Franois Alcover, Apr 18 2014 *)
PROG
(Haskell)
a026300 n k = a026300_tabl !! n !! k
a026300_row n = a026300_tabl !! n
a026300_tabl = iterate (\row -> zipWith (+) ([0, 0] ++ row) $
zipWith (+) ([0] ++ row) (row ++ [0])) [1]
-- Reinhard Zumkeller, Oct 09 2013
CROSSREFS
KEYWORD
nonn,tabl,nice
AUTHOR
Clark Kimberling
EXTENSIONS
approved
Endbox has to be thanked and take alot of credit, for the new revised version of
the ISOLATOR. I wasn't quite happy with the original concept. It appeared to be
an attractive option. Betting on one number at a time. But the consistency has
proved negative. With as many as 19 losing bets in a row.
Now for some time I have been wondering if the Eliminator could be improved. If
I could find something that had a similar or better strike rate. And a better
monthly turnover.
I have FOUND IT. Thanks to something Endbox mentioned a while back about the
first line in the ISOLATOR virtually always getting down to the last number in 6--8 draws. I decided to see how this would work using the Eliminator concept of
betting on the final 2 numbers for a maximum of 4 bets.
The results for 2006 from 45 completed ISOLATORS. Are very impressive. Lets
just say the Eliminator has been dethroned. I will be posting those 45 results and
the new rules for the ISOLATOR over the next few days. Peace.
#2
05-18-2006, 06:35 PM
fullhouse
Registered User
The One!
Okay this is the revised ISOLATOR that I have been speaking about. I enjoyed my
first official win today when number 24 split (24)(26) in the 5th draw to become
the 40th winner of 2006. Below is what a numbers grid for the ISOLATOR looks
like.
01,02,03,04,05,06,07,
11,12,13,14,15,16,17,
21,22,23,24,25,26,27,
31,32,33,34,35,36,37,
41,42,43,44,45,46,47,
There are still just 35 numbers in the new ISOLATOR. The basic rules are as
follows.
(01) There are 10 ISOLATORS per month, spaced out 6 draws apart. Always
starting on the 1st of the month and then 6 draws apart. So these would be the
starting points of the 10 ISOLATORS for May.
(01)
(02)
(03)
(04)
(05)
(06)
(07)
(08)
(09)
(10)
The
The
The
The
The
The
The
The
The
The
1st
4th
7th
10th
13th
16th
19th
22nd
25th
28th
When the first line gets down to the last 2 numbers. It has qualified for that
particular ISOLATOR. And all the other lines are excluded. You then proceed to
bet on those two numbers for a maximum of 4 bets. In the same way you would
for the Eliminator.
If 2 or more lines qualify simultaneously. You favour line 31-37 if it is among
them. Or line 21-27. If the 30s are not there. Or thirdly 41-47. The reason being
these lines have a better success rate Over the others.
If the first line is a void by 2 of the last 3 numbers being drawn together. You wait
for the second line to qualify and go with that one instead. The biggest difference
between the Isolator and the Eliminator apart from there being 4 more a month.
Is you have to wait far less time to get the win or loss. For example a typical
Eliminator takes 18--22 draws to complete. An Isolator can be over as quickly as
*3* draws. And that is the major improvement. Most wins or losses are achieved
in 2-4 days instead of 9-12. And that keeps the interest and turnover coming
faster.
So those are the basics, if anyone wants to know anymore. Feel free to ask me.
This isn't replacing the Eliminator, Simply working alongside it. Together we now
have a fantastic monthly turnover of a potential 16 wins. But a realistic 12 or 13
instead of the 4 or 5 the Eliminator alone would give us. Some nice winning
streaks are possible. There has been 10 in a row already this year. And after
todays win we now have a streak of 9 in a row. So below are the years results so
far. Peace..
(THE ISOLATOR 2006 RESULTS)
---JANUARY--NO.01 WON IN DRAW 5-(21)-BET/1
NO.02 LOST
NO.03 WON IN DRAW 7-(33)-BET/1
NO.04 WON IN DRAW 7-(16)-BET/4
NO.05 WON IN DRAW 8-(42)-BET/2
NO.06 LOST
NO.07 WON IN DRAW 7-(12)-BET/1
NO.08 WON IN DRAW 8-(37)-BET/4
NO.09 WON IN DRAW 6-(33)-BET/2
NO.10 WON IN DRAW 7-(47)-BET/3
---FEBRUARY--NO.11 WON IN DRAW 8-(44)-BET/3
NO.12 WON IN DRAW 8-(24)-BET/1
NO.13 WON IN DRAW 8-(37)-BET/4
NO.14 WON IN DRAW 4-(31)-BET/1
NO.15 LOST
NO.16 WON IN DRAW 9-(34)-BET/3
NO.17 WON IN DRAW 4-(07)-BET/1
NO.18 WON IN DRAW 4-(26)-BET/1
NO.19 WON IN DRAW 5-(33)-BET/2
NO.20 WON IN DRAW 3-(37)-BET/1
---MARCH--NO.21 WON IN DRAW 8-(31)-BET/3
NO.22 WON IN DRAW 8-(33)-BET/1
NO.23 WON IN DRAW 9-(27)-BET/3
NO.24 WON IN DRAW 9-(05)-BET/4
NO.25 WON IN DRAW11'(23)-BET/4
NO.26 LOST
NO.27 WON IN DRAW 5-(23)-BET/2
NO.28 LOST
NO.29 WON IN DRAW 3-(05)-BET/1
NO.30 WON IN DRAW 5-(01)-BET/2
---APRIL--NO.31 WON IN DRAW 5-(21)-BET/2
NO.32 WON IN DRAW11'(31)-BET/4
NO.33 WON IN DRAW 5-(36)-BET/1
NO.34 WON IN DRAW 5-(06)-BET/2
NO.35 WON IN DRAW 4-(11)-BET/1
NO.36 WON IN DRAW 6-(27)-BET/3
NO.37 LOST
NO.38 WON IN DRAW 4-(46)-BET/1
NO.39 WON IN DRAW 7-(04)-BET/1
NO.40 WON IN DRAW 8-(07)-BET/4
---MAY--NO.41 WON IN DRAW 6-(26)-BET/3
NO.42 WON IN DRAW 9-(44)-BET/4
NO.43 WON IN DRAW 6-(16)-BET/2
NO.44 WON IN DRAW 6-(33)-BET/1
NO.45 WON IN DRAW 7-(42)-BET/2
NO.46 WON IN DRAW 5-(24)-BET/1
#3
05-19-2006, 03:07 AM
taaroa
Registered User
Thanks fullhouse for sharing this new finding. Thanks also to Enbox for inspiring
this new isolator. A new tool to hit the jackpot!
Take care,
taaroa
#4
05-19-2006, 05:17 PM
fullhouse
Registered User
Quote:
Hi Taaroa,
Yes it is a solid strategy. Not a jackpot winner. But it will increase your bankroll
over the course of a year considerably. As long as you're are faithful to the rules.
And don't try to grow too fast. Peace...
#5
05-20-2006, 11:59 AM
endbox
Registered User
Hi all
#6
05-20-2006, 07:10 PM
fullhouse
Registered User
Quote:
#7
05-21-2006, 02:27 PM
Springbok
Registered User
Hi Fullhouse, Endbox
You really are observant. I came across this situation with the 2 numbers on one
line but ignored it as I was searching for the one number in the isolator. At this
stage I have not tested the previous isolator technique further because of a lack
of time but will be spending some time on it as I will be working a normal working
hours for the next 8 days. Let's talk about staking on your new strategy, taking
into account you have to bet on 2 numbers. Obviously you have to use
progressive staking up to 4 bets and make a profit that takes into account
previous losses.
#8
05-21-2006, 08:09 PM
fullhouse
Registered User
Quote:
HEY SPRINGBOK!
Nice to hear from you again. It gets kind of lonely on here, Lol! Yes if there is one
thing you will learn about me it is I consider good money management the most
important aspect of any strategy. The discipline to hold back when you should and
throw down when its due. With the ISOLATOR. I don't believe in a rigid
mechanical style of staking. So for example I would never just bet 1pt bet one,
2pts bet 2 and so on.
I would take each ISOLATOR in relation to what happened in the last one. So if
the previous ISOLATOR had been a losing one. In the following one I would
double stakes or even treble them. Also I watch for how many times and
ISOLATOR has or hasn't won in the first 2 bets. Because these are the bets that
can make profit at level stakes. Bet 3 would break even at level staking and bet 4
would give you a 33% loss at level stakes. So my goal is to utilize the wins in the
first 2 bets to the MAX. So if the last 2 or 3 Isolators won in bet 3 or 4. I would
again increase my stakes for bets one and two in the following ISOLATORS.
Another method I use in the Eliminator. Is to automatically drop down to half
stakes after **3** consecutive wins. The thinking here is a loss is inevitable.
Although long streaks are possible. The average is 4 wins in a row, for the
Eliminator. Lately is has been 5. The Isolator is capable of producing streaks of 8
or more on a regular basis. So I may set the threshold at 6 before reducing to
half stakes. And after a loss I double up again. This method protects your profits.
And then exploits the fact that back to back losers rarely occur. And I have never
seen 3 losers in a row for the Eliminator. I can't speak for the Isolator yet. But
one thing is certain. It at least matches the Eliminators minumum of 3 wins to
every loss. And that is all you need to know.
Today ISOLATOR 47 QUALIFIED. The first line 31--37 was a void when numbers
31/33 were drawn lunchtime leaving just number 36. But number 43 was also
drawn in line 41--47. Leaving numbers (44)(47) which are our qualifiers. I bet
very little on the first bet at Teatime. BECAUSE, the previous ISOLATOR won in
the first bet. Again my staking is ALWAYS in response to what occurs before. And
it has served me well. So from tommorow I will increase my stakes on numbers
(44)(47). I am aware that we are on a serious winning streak now. Presently at 9
in a row. So I expect a loser soon. And this may be it. Peace...
#9
05-23-2006, 12:03 PM
syscrash
Registered User
I'm not sure about the revised method... but If I follow your instruction...
tomorrow we should all look at 24 and 25?
#10
05-23-2006, 12:43 PM
fullhouse
Registered User
Quote:
Hi Syscrash.
ISOLATOR 47 ended today with number 47 splitting (44)(47) and giving us our
10th win in a row which is fantastic.
Now you see the beauty of this new ISOLATOR Syscrash. No sooner have we had
our latest winner and ISOLATOR 48 is already qualified with (like you said )
numbers (24)(25) So yes tomorrow we go after that pair. Be careful though. After
10 wins in a row. We must expect a loss now. So don't go crazy.
So here is how the ISOLATOR stands for 2006 now.
WINS 41
LOSSES 6
OVERALL S/R 6.6--1
Exceptional at the moment. I can't believe this can hold for the year. Only time
will tell. Peace...
#11
05-23-2006, 12:43 PM
fullhouse
Registered User
Quote:
Hi Syscrash.
ISOLATOR 47 ended today with number 47 splitting (44)(47) and giving us our
10th win in a row which is fantastic.
Now you see the beauty of this new ISOLATOR Syscrash. No sooner have we had
our latest winner and ISOLATOR 48 is already qualified with (like you said )
numbers (24)(25) So yes tomorrow we go after that pair. Be careful though. After
10 wins in a row. We must expect a loss now. So don't go crazy.
So here is how the ISOLATOR stands for 2006 now.
WINS 41
LOSSES 6
OVERALL S/R 6.6--1
Exceptional at the moment. I can't believe this can hold for the year. Only time
will tell. Peace...
#12
05-24-2006, 08:17 AM
syscrash
Registered User
#13
05-24-2006, 12:26 PM
fullhouse
Registered User
11 in a row!
Quote:
Hi Syscrash,
Strictly speaking no. We only want the first available line in each ISOLATOR. So
today at lunchtime number 24 popped. And gave us our 11th win in a row. And
8th in a row for May. Which is above all my expectations. Number 24 has
redeemed itself. As it has now given the ISOLATOR 2 of its last 3 wins. Both in the
first bet. Now the only question is, can this winning streak continue And give us a
perfect month for the first time this year? It is a big ask. It would mean the
winning streak would have to extend to 13 in a row. But It would be a wonderful
start for this fantastic Strategy. Especially as the Eliminator and S-B-S strategies
have under performed in May. So here is how we now stand with the ISOLATOR
after 48 starts.
WINS 42
LOSSES 06
OVERALL S/R 7--1
LONGEST WINNING STREAK 11 IN A ROW (CURRENT)
A strike rate of 7--1 is unheard of. I know this can't maintain. But I will enjoy it
while it does. So now we have a little wait as this ISOLATOR finished fast.
Tomorrow ISOLATOR 49 begins. Lets see if we can go 12 in a row. Peace...
#14
05-24-2006, 05:28 PM
endbox
Registered User
Hi all
Back from holl's.........Anyway back to the serious buisiness , this stratergy seems
superb , gone back 100 draws or so & picked random points ......Your're right
Fullhouse it works !........As one ISOLATOR finishes I'm still going to start a fresh ,
ie just wait untill another qualifies , take care endbox
#15
05-24-2006, 05:40 PM
fullhouse
Registered User
Quote:
Hi Endbox,
Yes I have only ever seen a winning streak longer than 11 in a row ONCE. And
that was the Eliminator from late OCTOBER 2005 to early JANUARY 2006 when it
went 14 in a row minus the voids in between. This ISOLATOR has already given
us 10 in a row this year. And is now 11 in a row. If the next 2 win that will be a
perfect 10 out of 10 for May. A FULLHOUSE, Lol!
But as I said that is a big ask. To go 13 in a row. Man I will be excited. I like the
increased frequency alot too Endbox. For example yesterday ISOLATOR 47 won
when (44)(47) split with number 47. And today ISOLATOR 48 won with number
24 splitting (24)(25)
That would never happen so fast with the Eliminator. You usually have to wait at
least four to six days between wins and losses. So if the previous Eliminator was a
loss. You have to dwell on it too long. With the ISOLATOR its not going to be too
long before you're back to winning ways. I love it. And you are largely to thank
Endbox.
So work this baby. Your bankroll is going to grow. And at a faster pace. I just
hope you don't start with the expected loss. Lol! Peace...
Was thinking the number picker challenge is possibly a good opportunity to share
ideas/methods on selecting numbers. I will post my current selection method and
others are free to share theirs (or not). I don't know how LotteryHits selects so
won't be able to provide that. My current method (done by computer):
Randomly select 20 unique numbers. Compare the selected set to the following
criteria and discard if it fails:
No more than 5 matching any of the previous jackpots (I use the full draw
history).
No more than 4 matching any of the last 100 draws.
No more than 3 matching any of the last 3 draws.
No more than 6 matching the last 3 draws combined (so no more than 6 from the
18 numbers in the last 3 draws).
Odd/Even 8-12.
High/Low 8-12.
No more than 6 from same decade.
No more than 3 of the same last digit.
No more than 3 of the same individual number rootsum.
No more than 4 from the same 7 number group (1-7, 8-14 etc.)
#2
01-28-2014, 07:41 AM
Icewynd
Registered User
Hi Ramijami,
Great idea for a post!
What I do is to list all 49 numbers by their skip. I then eliminate numbers that
have skipped more than 10 games. Then I look at what I can eliminate based on
decades, playslip groups (7's grouped by rows and columns), last digits, expected
repeats, etc. Using these 'clues' I eliminate numbers until I have only 20 left.
Good luck!
#3
01-28-2014, 02:41 PM
jol
Registered User
Other than the first challenge game I use non of the above.
I have used the challenge to try a new idea based on previous line hits/misses.
Numbers are the first 20 with no alteration or filter, if it throws out 1 to 20 then
that is what I would use.
I have been chasing the bubble a bit but from now on I will use the same system
without tinkering.
It will be interesting to see how it does.
#4
02-09-2014, 01:48 PM
Ramijami
Registered User
Was thinking of a "starting" point for a strategy. The premise is "What if" we
combine the two sets that consistently matches the most numbers when
combined to create a possible starting or "Master" set. These are the previous
sets (from draw 12) with the matching numbers on the side (not sure if there are
errors):
Random - 1 2 4 6 10 11 12 18 19 20 25 26 31 32 34 36 38 42 44 49 --- 25 36 44
(04)
Frank - 03 05 07 09 10 12 14 16 19 20 21 24 26 30 35 45 46 47 48 49
Ramijami - 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 9, 17, 19, 22, 24, 25, 28, 30, 38, 39, 40, 42, 44, 45, 47
-- 08 25 39 44
LotteryHits - 04 09 11 12 18 19 23 24 25 27 28 29 30 31 33 35 41 45 46 49 --25 27 (04)
Blitzed - 04 07 08 13 16 18 26 29 30 31 33 34 39 40 41 43 44 46 47 49 --- 08
39 44 (04)
IceWynd - 2 4 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 22 23 24 25 26 37 44 45 --- 8 25 44
(04)
Jol - 1 4 5 9 10 11 14 15 16 18 19 25 28 29 35 37 43 45 47 48 --- 25 (4)
Niteowl - 02 04 07 10 11 15 18 19 24 25 28 29 30 35 36 37 40 41 45 49 --- 25
36 (04)
These are the two sets COMBINED that gave the most numbers for draw twelve:
Random+Ramijami (5+b)
1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 9, 17, 19, 22, 24, 25, 28, 30, 38, 39, 40, 42, 44, 45, 47
4 10 11 12 18 20 26 31 32 34 36 49 (32)
Ramijami+Lottery Hits (5+b)
1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 9, 17, 19, 22, 24, 25, 28, 30, 38, 39, 40, 42, 44, 45, 47
04 11 12 18 23 27 29 31 33 35 41 46 49 (33)
Ramijami+NiteOwl (5+b)
1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 9, 17, 19, 22, 24, 25, 28, 30, 38, 39, 40, 42, 44, 45, 47
04 07 10 11 15 18 29 35 36 37 41 49 (32)
These produced (5+b) in 32/33 numbers. I'm sure there should be some full
Jackpots matches in those draws where there was a 5 number match (haven't
had time to back test other than this draw). Could be a possible strategy to
explore if one can choose which two predicted sets to combine to best effect?????
What do others think?
#5
02-10-2014, 07:11 AM
Icewynd
Registered User
#6
02-11-2014, 11:56 AM
jol
Registered User
Ramijami. Icewynd
Agreed thats still a massive set of numbers to cover.
Have you ever tried to hit 6 yourself in less than 33 numbers ? your picks so far
in the challenge suggest that you can probably beat 33.
How about a hit 6 in the lowest set of numbers challenge, you pick any set of
numbers, set then out in the order you want them used then see who gets all 6 in
the lowest number of balls.
Hello Jack, I've never tried converting lotto results into Cartesian coordinates, but
have often thought it would be fun to do so. If it were possible, it would make an
interesting chart. I note you had a response when you posted the same question
in that other forum, but must admit the reply did not make much sense to me,
the example given did not stack up. What is your interest and where did you hear
of this idea?
#3
09-27-2014, 09:52 AM
jack
Registered User
#4
09-27-2014, 12:07 PM
Frank
Registered User
#5
09-27-2014, 12:58 PM
Join Date: Feb 2011
jack
Registered User
Posts: 472
#6
09-28-2014, 03:12 AM
Frank
Registered User
But this has nothing to do with Cartesian coordinates does it? Cartesian
coordinates are two numbers , one in the X direction, one on the Y direction and
where they meet on a chart or a grid is where you plot or reference a point. What
you describe is nothing like that.
#7
09-28-2014, 06:31 AM
jack
Registered User
Posts: 472
#8
09-28-2014, 06:39 AM
Frank
Registered User
Well I'm sorry Jack, nothing you are saying make any sense to me, so think its
best we leave it there. I'll devise my own interpretation based on the Cartesian
plane, I think!
#9
09-28-2014, 06:44 AM
jack
Registered User
Hello, frank, objective view is predisposed draw a matrix (rows and columns)
joining a point, starting from the center. as you would then use the Cartesian? in
excel?
#10
09-28-2014, 06:59 AM
Frank
Registered User
But you've not explained at all how a lottery result 13,17,23,36,7,42 ends up in a
matrix. Nor how 1000 similar ones end up in the same matrix. If you can't do
that, I give up.
#11
09-28-2014, 10:15 AM
bloubul
Registered User
Hi Jack
Do you mind uploading a spreadsheet explaining / demostrating your statement.
I'm as confused as Frank.
[url]www.MediaFire.com[/url] is a free service, upload and paste the link here.
BlouBul
#12
09-28-2014, 10:19 AM
jack
Registered User
1 2 3 4 5 POSITONS
A 01 02 03 04 05
B 06 07 08 09 10
C 11 12 13 14 15
D 16 17 18 19 20
E 21 22 23 24 25
F 26 27 28 29 30
J 31 32 33 34 35
G 36 37 38 39 40
E 41 42 43 44 45
L 46 47 48 49
13 =C3
#13
09-28-2014, 10:26 AM
jack
Registered User
ok boublo=
linkhttp://www.mediafire.com/view/rcgpgcv5pxofhjy/SUMS_CARTESIAN_(1)
(2).xlsm
#14
09-28-2014, 10:28 AM
jack
Registered User
End Sub
#15
09-28-2014, 10:38 AM
Join Date: Feb 2011
jack
Posts: 472
Registered User
[url]http://ge.tt/9wNjXkz1/v/0?c[/url]
Buscar
5 mensajes Pgina 1 de 1
BUENAS NOCHES POR FAVOR QUIEN DE USTEDES ME PODRIA EXPLICAR EL METODO DEL ESPEJO
EN LA LOTERIA, POR EJEMPLO ME DICEN EL 3 SE CONVIERTE EN 8, Y ASI SUCESIVAMENTE, COMO
ASI GRACIAS
sofiaandrea
Mensajes: 337
Registrado: 23 Abr 2014, 12:32
A
r
r
i
b
a
Saludos Sofia
Es esta tabla de conversin de dgitos
1=6
2=7
3=8
4=9
5=0
Existen muchas pero esa es una de las mas utilizada.
a la orden.
investigadorloteril
Mensajes: 1096
Registrado: 05 Sep 2012, 11:38
Ubicacin: Venezuela-Carabobo.
A
r
r
i
b
a
La tabla que te da el investigador ... define una relacin de equivalencia entre los dgitos del
0 al 9 ...
Supongase que Ud. vio salir en la loteria al .. 508 (La Causa) .... en chance ... lo mas lgico es
que esta salida ... tenga un efecto posterior en los sorteos subsiguientes ... Muchos estudiosos
estiman que ... haciendo las conversiones de los dgitos usando la tabla ... sera una buena
proyeccin o futura jugada en CHANCE ( La misma lotera donde sali el 508) o en su defecto
en otra de la misma operadora en este caso TACHIRA ... As vemos ... por la construccin de
las respectivas equivalencias posibles ... puedes conseguir las 7 sombras ... clones ...
camuflajes .. como te guste ms llamarlos ...
508 -- 503 -- 558 -- 553 -- 008 -- 003 -- 058 -- 053 .. que son el 503 y sus 7 clones ...
Asi ves que cada triple tiene 7 clones o imagenes segn este "espejo"...
Ahora .. si a ese "Espejo" le llamas conversin ... o un "Lente" especial ... Veras las 7imagenes que el 508 proyecta ...
Los "Espejos" como les conocemos en casa ... solo proyectan una imagen ... que se llama el
mundo dual ... Tipo Alicia en el Pas de las Maravillas ... El mundo donde todo cambia de
sentido .. la izquierda es la derecha y viceversa ..
Con este "Espejo" ... el 508 .. lo veramos como 805 .... al que si le podramos llamar en
propiedad su espejo ...
Alabado sea el seor ... si con esta explicacin corta .. llega la suficiente luz a tu intelecto y
logras descifrar el mundo de la numerologia loteril ...
Saludos .. Un placer de antemano ...
Beremiz
Mensajes: 235
Registrado: 05 Ene 2012, 20:37
felicitaciones malba tahan por tan concisa y precisa informacion ,que buena .de verdad que
admiro tu talento y dios permita que puedas transmitirlo a muchos de tus decendientes .que
asi sea amen.
sjllove
muchas graciasamigo deltadelorinoco espero que consigas pronto esa formula de la centena .
sjllove
Mensajes: 654
Registrado: 29 Dic 2010, 08:10
A
r
r
i
b
a
Mensajes: 235
Registrado: 05 Ene 2012, 20:37
A
r
r
i
b
a
Muchas gracias beremiz es comprencible lo que dices todo cuesta y mucho mas esto que tiene
que ver con dinero ser o no ser esa es la cuestion.yo pagaria por tu informacion loteril .puedo
solicitar tu correo y ponernos de acuerdo .se que eres bueno en esto ya que hace mucho
tiempo veo tus apariciones en varios foros.
sjllove
Mensajes: 654
Registrado: 29 Dic 2010, 08:10
A
r
r
i
b
a
Mensajes: 1096
Registrado: 05 Sep 2012, 11:38
Ubicacin: Venezuela-Carabobo.
A
r
r
i
b
a
buenas noches amigo beremiz o el investigador .les queria pedir por favor si podrian
explicarnos este sistema rutiliano
He aqu una regla, presumiblemente rutiliana, conveniente para ganar con el nmero
simptico para cualquier mes. La reproduzco fielmente como ha sido transmitida por el
astrnomo, fsico y cabalista veneciano Pietro Casamia: Para realizar esta operacin, es decir
para obtener el verdadero nmero simptico mensual, conviene en primer lugar saber cuantos
das tenga la luna en aquellos primeros das del mes por cul se querr obrar.
79 12 86
71315
8446
381