Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
INTRODUCTION
reatine (Cr) loading is a common strategy to enhance performance in various types of athletic
endeavors. Previous research indicates that Cr
loading augments short-term, sprint exercise
(13, 22), resistance training (7, 18, 25, 27), and repeated
bouts of high-intensity exercise (2, 10). The magnitude of
performance enhancement with Cr loading reported in
previous studies varies due to different subjects, loading
regimens, Cr quality, and exercise protocols, yet recent
research (21) indicated approximately 26% improvement
during resistance training combined with Cr loading vs.
training alone. The exact mechanism explaining the ergogenic benefit of Cr supplementation remains to be identified, although increased phosphocreatine (PCr) resynthesis (2, 9), lean body mass (7, 18), and training volume
(18) have been implicated.
Research investigating any potential benefit of Cr
loading on endurance performance is relatively sparse. In
trained men (3), a decrease in endurance performance
was demonstrated, which was attributed to weight gain
(10.9 kg). In this study, a 6-km terrain run and treadmill
run to exhaustion at a workload equivalent to 120% max O2max) were completed by subjects,
imal oxygen uptake (V
and were repeated after administration of Cr (6 days of
O2
loading at 5 gday21) or placebo. No difference in peak V
was demonstrated between the Cr and placebo group vs.
730
METHODS
Experimental Approach to the Problem
Immediately after season-ending competition, cross-country athletes were separated randomly into an experimental (RA) or placebo (PL) group. Both athletes and research
technicians were blinded as to the specific treatment given to each subject. Subjects initially completed baseline
testing (BASE), a 5,000-m run followed by treadmill
O2max testing. After ingesting either RA or similar dose
V
PL 4872 hours later, subjects repeated testing at the
same time of day.
Subjects
CREATINE SERUM
TABLE 1. Demographic data for subjects in the RA and PL
groups.*
Parameter (Mean 6 SD)
RA (n 5 13)
PL (n 5 11)
Age (y)
Height (in)
Weight (kg)
% BF
O2max (mlkg21min21)
V
Gender (men, women)
19.50 6 1.42
68.62 6 4.52
63.41 6 8.97
12.25 6 7.46
54.76 6 9.72
8, 5
20.80 6 1.54
68.18 6 3.16
60.86 6 6.40
8.31 6 4.28
56.92 6 7.51
9, 2
Subjects were separated randomly into 2 groups: an experimental group (n 5 13) who took the recommended
dose (5 ml) of RA 10 minutes pre-exercise (according to
the manufacturers instructions), and a control group (n
5 11), who ingested a similar volume of PL solution (water, cyclomethyl cellulose [0.2%], aspartame [0.2%], 1%
citric acid, sodium benzoate [0.1%], red color no. 40, and
cherry and raspberry flavors [0.2%]). Demographic characteristics of the subjects are listed in Table 1. No differ-
AND
ences in any physical characteristics were evident between groups. The solutions were housed in identical bottles and were administered to subjects by the primary
investigator in a single-blind fashion, so only the primary
investigator was aware of the assignment of RA vs. PL
for each subject. Solutions were administered to the subjects based on the manufacturers instructions. Ingredients in RA are the following: 2.5 g of Cr monohydrate, Dribose, D-glucose, glucosamine sulfate, magnesium ascorbate, calcium pantothenate, calcium pyruvate, citrus bioflavonoids, green tea extract, guarana extract, L-arginine,
L-glutamine, L-carnitine, Siberian ginseng, royal jelly,
Vitamin B12, zinc gluconate, and chromium picolinate.
The serum produced specifically for women is slightly different, because it contains the aforementioned ingredients combined with wild yam extract, garcinia cambogia
extract, sorbitol, and glycerin.
o2max Assessment
V
Body height and weight were measured, and body composition was assessed using skinfold (SKF) calipers
(Lange Beta Technology, Cambridge, MD). The primary
investigator measured subcutaneous fat at 3 sites on the
body, following standardized procedures: chest, abdomen,
and thigh for men, and triceps, thigh, and anterior suprailiac for women (14). Sum of SKF was converted to %
BF using a common nomogram (16). Two measurements
at each site were taken in rotational order, and a third
measurement was recorded if the first 2 measures deviated by more than 10%.
Pretest Guidelines
732
ET AL.
RESULTS
5,000-m Run
Heart rate, RPE, and run time were increased significantly (p , 0.01) with each lap in both treatments. With
RA ingestion, no significant differences in RPE vs. BASE
were observed across the 5,000-m run, with the exception
of laps 4.58.5, when it was lower (p 5 0.01; Figure 1a).
Heart rate toward the end of the run was consistently
higher in RA than in BASE; however, no statistically significant differences were evident except at lap 3.5 (Figure
1b). Run time was significantly slower early in the run
with RA ingestion vs. BASE, and a nonsignificant trend
was shown for impaired performance (approximately 10
seconds) with RA (Figure 1c). Mean run time was 19.03
6 2.32 minutes at BASE vs. 19.20 6 2.61 minutes with
RA. With PL, RPE was significantly lower ( p , 0.025)
from laps 3.55.5 vs. BASE (Figure 2a). With PL ingestion, HR was significantly lower ( p , 0.025) vs. BASE at
laps 1.54.5, yet was similar during the remainder of the
run (Figure 2b). Run time was significantly slower ( p ,
0.025) at 1.55.5 laps with PL vs. BASE. Times to complete the 5,000-m run were similar in PL (18.94 6 2.41
minutes) and BASE (19.03 6 2.39 minutes; Figure 2c).
Run times were similar in RA and PL.
o2max Assessment
V
CREATINE SERUM
AND
BASE
54.07
3.88
1.12
126.40
192.40
8.67
6
6
6
6
6
6
9.36
1.13
0.05
31.79
8.10
0.76
RA
56.48
4.11
1.14
131.60
196.20
9.26
6
6
6
6
6
6
p
8.93
1.22
0.04
29.82
9.34
1.03
0.01
0.001
0.21
0.09
0.09
0.001
BASE
57.28
3.80
1.11
123.50
191.80
9.81
6
6
6
6
6
6
7.22
0.88
0.04
21.72
7.07
2.10
PL
58.85
4.00
1.13
128.20
191.10
9.89
6
6
6
6
6
6
p
6.67
0.87
0.03
20.38
6.53
2.13
0.09
0.01
0.05
0.09
0.60
0.85
* RA 5 Runners Advantage (experimental); PL 5 placebo; BASE 5 baseline testing; RER 5 respiratory exchange ratio; HR 5
heart rate.
p , 0.025.
DISCUSSION
The primary aim of the study was to determine any potential ergogenic benefit of Runners Advantage Cr serum
to enhance running performance. Data from this random O2max
ized, placebo-controlled study demonstrated that V
is significantly higher with administration of RA vs.
BASE. In addition, RPE was significantly lower with RA
ingestion. Nevertheless, compared with baseline testing,
5,000-run time was unaffected by RA ingestion, and athletes tended to run slower after RA ingestion. Consequently, our hypothesis that RA Cr serum does not enhance running performance was met, and the manufacturers claims of the ergogenic effects of this serum may
be unfounded. However, additional research into its potential ergogenic properties may be warranted if a serum
with a larger Cr dose and institution of a loading phase
is developed.
No benefit of RA on 5,000-m run time was evident in
this study. A likely explanation for this result comes from
previous work from Kreider et al. (19). In that study,
muscle biopsies from the vastus lateralis were obtained
from 40 men after randomized ingestion of low- and highdose placebo, 2.5 and 20 g of Muscle Marketings ATP
Advantage Cr serum, and 20 g of Cr monohydrate powder
for 5 days. Results demonstrated significant ( p , 0.05)
increments in muscle (PCr), free (Cr), and total creatine
with Cr monohydrate ingestion, suggesting Cr retention.
In contrast, Cr serum ingestion did not significantly alter
concentrations of these phosphagens, and it was found
that this product did not contain Cr. These data suggest
that ingestion of this Cr serum does not promote Cr retention. Because the ergogenic potential of Cr loading is
dependent upon its ability to enhance muscle (PCr) and
total creatine (12, 15), an inability of Cr serum to be taken
up by muscle may preclude any ergogenic benefits of this
product.
Despite there being no change in 5,000-m run time
with intake of RA, do the data have practical significance
O2max was higher ( p 5 0.01)
for the competitive runner? V
after RA ingestion, yet the magnitude of increase was
within the coefficient of variation of V O2max testing in
our laboratory. Green tea extract, a constituent in the
serum, has been reported to have a thermogenic effect by
significantly increasing 24-hour energy expenditure (1
329 kJ) and RER-derived fat oxidation in healthy men (6).
O2max in response to RA
This may explain the higher V
ingestion. In addition, it is evident that factors (lactate
threshold, running economy, substrate status) other than
PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS
The manufacturers claims of Runners Advantage Cr serum to confer an ergogenic benefit to runners are not entirely supported by our findings. With RA ingestion,
O2max was sig5,000-m run time was unchanged, yet V
nificantly higher. In current form and dosage, this product may have minimal ergogenic benefit, so we do not
recommend its use in competitive runners seeking to enhance performance.
734
ET AL.
REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the cooperation put forth by Coach
Jim Jones and the athletes on the cross-country team at
Salisbury University. The primary investigator would like to
thank Dr. Richard B. Kreider for providing a side effects/
symptoms inventory. This study was funded by Muscle
Marketing USA. However, the researchers independently
collected, analyzed, and interpreted all data and hold no
financial interest in the outcomes of this study. Dissemination
of results in this study do not constitute endorsement of the
tested supplement by the investigators or the National Strength
and Conditioning Association.
Address correspondence
astorino@csusm.edu
to
Todd
A.
Astorino,