Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
College of Engineering
Chemical Engineering Department
Manila
Experiment no. 4
Distribution
Group no. 5
Name
Signature
1. Coloma, Gillyn M.
2. Pascu al, Ronald Patrick D.
3. Sosa, Ma. Rebecah D.
Student No.
201211846
201210270
201211508
The Nernst law is summarized by the above figure which states that if a
solute X distributes between two non-miscible solvents A and B at a constant
temperature and X is in the same molecular conditions for in both of them,
then the ratio of the concentrations of X in the two solvents is a constant
quantity.
The law only applies at constant temperature and at same molecular state
of solute in both solvents (disregarding association or dissociation). The
solvents used must be insoluble with each other and the addition of solute
does not alter their solubility. The solutes to be added are in low
concentrations, the law does not apply in high concentrations. Finally, the
concentrations of solute in each solvent must be noted after reaching
equilibrium
This experiment aims to determine the values of K and n in the
distribution of acetic acid (solute) between diethyl ether (solvent A) and
water
(solvent
B).
THEORY
When a solute is added to a mixture of two miscible liquids and the system is
allowed to come to equilibrium at some given temperature, the following
relationship will hold regardless of the quantity of solute added:
Ka=
an2 /a 1
(1)
where Ka is the distribution constant, a 1 and a2 are the activities of the solute
in the two solvents, and n is the ratio of the average molecular weight in
solvent 1 to its average molecular weight in solvent 2. Association will
increase the average molecular weight, while dissociation will decrease it. It
is to be noted that n may vary considerably with concentration due to
changes in the degrees of association and dissociation.
In order to simplify this experiment, concentrations will be substituted for
activities in the above equation, so that the distribution equation becomes
Kc=
C2 /C 1
(2)
C2 /C 1
C2
C1
solvent
n = ration of the average molecular weight of the
solute in the solvent 1 to that in solvent 2
If the solute dissociates in aqueous solution, its
average molecular weight in water decreases and n
is greater than 1.
If the solute associates in water solution, its
average molecular weight in water increases and n
is less than 1.
9. Record the results in the table.
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Preparation of Glacial Acetic Acid Solutions at 0.1 M, 0.5 M, and 0.25
M concentrations
17 Molar
Glacial
Acetic Acid
120 mL 1.0
M Acetic
Acid
Solution
60 mL 1.0
M for
experiment
60 mL 1.0
M for
further
dilution
120 mL 0.5
M Acetic
Acid
Solution
60 mL 0.5
M for
experiment
60 mL 0.5
M for
further
dilution
120 mL
0.25 M
Acetic Acid
Solution
0.5 M NaOH
solution
80 mL for 0.5
M for
experiment
40 mL for
further
dilution
200 mL 0.1 M
NaOH
solution
Experimental Procedure
10 mL of bottom
layer was used for
0.5 and 0.25 M
Acetic Acid
25 mL 1.0 M
Acetic Acid + 25
mL diethyl ether
in a separatory
funnel (Repeat for
0.5 and 0.25 M)
5 mL (for 1 M)
bottom layer +
10 mL distilled
water (Titrate with
0.5 M NaOH)
10 mL top layer
+ 10 mL distilled
water (Titrate with
0.1 M NaOH)
DATA RESULTS
A. Initial Concentration of Acetic Acid: 1.0M
Solvent
Water
Trial
NaOH
(mL)
MNaOH (M)
Vsolution (mL)
Msolution (M)
16
0.5
15
0.5333
15. 8
0.5
15
0.5267
Ether
Average
1
39
0.1
20
0.5300
0.1950
38
0.1
20
0.1900
Average
0.1925
Trial
NaOH
MNaOH
Vsolution
Msolution
9.2
0.5
15
0.3067
9.1
0.5
15
0.3033
0.3050
Ether
Average
1
24
0.1
20
0.1200
25
0.1
20
0.1250
Average
0.1225
Trial
NaOH
MNaOH
Vsolution
Msolution
5.1
0.5
15
0.1700
5.4
0.5
15
0.1800
Average
1
13.5
0.1
20
0.0675
13.3
0.1
20
0.0665
Average
0.1750
Ether
0.0670
Concentration Range
0.50 1.0 M
0.6701486265
K
3.394635268
0.25 0.50 M
3.033350867
1.086211311
Nernst Law [ C B /C A .
As shown from the table, the experimental value of n for 0.5
1.0M is less than 1. Contrary to the theory, n < 1 means association.
Possible sources of error include the concentrations of NaOH used
which are not standardized. Errors may also be because of overtitration and ether losses due its high volatility. Incomplete
separation of the two solvents may also incur some error to the
calculations. Conversely, from 0.25 0.50 M computations, the value
of n is now greater than 1 which denotes the expected dissociation
of acetic from water.
CONCLUSION
The experimenters were able to determine the values of K and n
from the experiment. The computations and behaviour deviated
from