Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
DigitalGlobe QuickBird:
Instrument / Product Descriptions
Released: June 10, 2007
Executive Summary
This document describes QuickBird satellite instrument and product characteristics. It was
prepared in accordance with the format of the GMES-CMDA-EOPG-IS-08-03 document.
This product description is intended to be considered by GMES for informational
purposes only, and is applicable only for DigitalGlobe's QuickBird sensor. This product
description document contains modifications of existing QuickBird documentation in order to
meet GMES' required format. Not all descriptions included in this document are
considered "standard" measurements or characteristics for the QuickBird sensor and therefore
none of these descriptions will be considered as binding "contractual specifications" for the
purpose of QuickBird product deliveries. The specifications provided herein are for
information purposes only and are subject to change. Standard "contractual specifications"
will be jointly agreed upon by DigitalGlobe and ESA prior to the delivery of any QuickBird
products. All specifications and products described herein, and/or products delivered in
accordance with the specifications herein, are intended for internal use only and may not be
disseminated publicly for a fee or otherwise.
VALUE
Validated
Monitored
Uncertainty
Code
Parameter
Definition
VALUE
Semimajor
axis,
eccentricity,
inclination,
orbit type/
description,
altitude,
uncertainties
IVOS-01
Mission status
The status describes whether the satellite still has to be launched [specify
future launch date], or the mission is currently in its commissioning
phase [specify launch date and end of commissioning phase], or in
its operational phase [specify launch date and beginning of operational
phase], or it is a past mission [specify launch date and end of mission].
Launch Date - October 18, 2001
Operational Date January 1, 2002
NA
Operated daily since launch.
NA
IVOS-02
Orbit elements, general orbit type and satellite altitude
Semimajor axis [km], eccentricity, inclination [deg].
For example whether the orbit is sun-synchronous, retrograde etc. The
operational altitude [km] (reference mean value) of the satellite above the Earth
surface.
6821.5 km, 0.00109, 97.2 deg, sun-synchronous at 10:30AM local mean time
at descending node, 450 km altitude at equator.
Uncertainties (orbit maintenance tolerances): +/- 1.5 km semi-major axis, +/0.0001 eccentricity, +/- 0.1 deg inclination, +/- 15 minutes local mean time,
+/- 1.5 km altitude.
IVOS-03
Instantaneous geometric field of view (IGFOV) [m2 at altitude H in
km]
The geometric size of the image projected by the detector on the ground
through the optical system. When expressed in linear or area units such as
meters or hectares, it is an altitude dependent measure of the ground
resolution of the instrument. This is also called pixel footprint, and it should
not be confused with the Ground Sample/ing Distance. (Ref: Joseph, G. 2004.
How well do we understand Earth observation electro optical sensor
parameters? Post-Launch
Calibration of Satellite Sensors. Taylor and Grancis group: London.)
(Note that imagery must be re-sampled to 0.5 meters for non-US Government
customers)
VALUE
Validated
Yes, through review of focal plane/CCD design. The focal plane utilizes line
arrays with 100% fill factor.
Monitored
Uncertainty
Not applicable
Code
Parameter
Definition
IVOS-04
Ground Sampling Distance (GSD) [m]
Ground Sample Distance (GSD) refers to the size of the pixels expressed in
ground units. The pixel size has not to be confused with the spatial resolution
which instead identifies the minimum separation between two objects at
which the resulting images of the objects appear distinct and separate.
VALUE
Validated
Monitored
Uncertainty
Validated during ground test and on-orbit. Value does not change with time
Quarterly
Less than 1 cm
Code
Parameter
Definition
IVOS-05
Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) at IGFOV [value at specific
frequency]
The Modulation Transfer Function describes the response of the imaging
sensor as a function of the spatial frequency. It is calculated by performing
the normalized Fourier Transform of the Point Spread Function. The point
spread function (PSF) describes the response of an imaging system to a point
source or point object. A related but more general term for the PSF is a
system's impulse response. Another related quantity is the Contrast Transfer
Function (CTF). MTF describes the response of an optical system to an
image decomposed into sine waves. CTF describes the response of an optical
system to an image decomposed into square waves. In other words, the
Modulation Transfer Function at IGFOV can be defined as the ratio of the
intensity variation of the ground scene to the intensity variation of the image
at a spatial frequency equal to the IGFOV.
VALUE
Validated
Monitored
Uncertainty
Code
Parameter
Definition
IVOS-06
MTF calculation procedure
Please provide a description of the MTF calculation procedure used to
derive the value specified in IVOS-05.
For our panchromatic bands, we calculate MTF from measurements of
painted edge targets on the ground, and compare to mathematical model
based on physical parameters of the sensor. We use two different algorithms
for converting edge response measurements to MTF. Our in-house
algorithm, based on Canova, et al., (Proc. SPIE, Vol. 3750, pp. 368-375) and
fits special functions to the edge response. These functions are then
analytically converted to MTF. The second algorithm has been supplied to
us by the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency and uses a Fast Fourier
Transform technique, averaging over many measurements. Each has its
advantages, but both give similar results. For the multispectral bands, we
calculate MTF from a physical/mathematical model, which agrees well with
the panchromatic measurements when applied using the pan sensor
parameters.
n/a
1.04m
n/a
n/a
1.04m
IVOS-07
Effective IFOV (EIFOV) [value at specific frequency]
VALUE
Validated
Monitored
Uncertainty
Code
Parameter
Definition
VALUE
Validated
Monitored
Uncertainty
Code
Parameter
Definition
VALUE
Validated
Monitored
Uncertainty
IVOS-08
Radiometrically accurate IFOV [value at specific frequency]
The resolution for which the MTF is higher than 0.95. (Ref: Joseph, G. 2004.
How well do we understand Earth observation electro-optical sensor
parameters?. Post-Launch Calibration of Satellite Sensors. Taylor and
Grancis group: London.)
Pan: 12m: Multi-spectral: < 16 m both at nadir
By analysis from MTF measurements of ground targets
No
Not calculated.
Code
Parameter
IVOS-09
Band to band registration [pixels at 1 sigma]
Definition
Distortions and differences between the various instruments bands due to the
detector (e.g. focal plane alignment and stability). The multispectral registration
is the maximum distance between the pixel centers of each multispectral
band corresponding to a selectable point. This error is measured relatively
from a reference band (TBD) to the others bands.
VALUE
Maximum misregistration in a typical strip from any color band to the pan
band does not exceed 2.5 PAN pixels, or 1.525 meters
Validated
Monitored
Uncertainty
Code
Parameter
Definition
IVOS-10
Centering accuracy [m at 1 sigma]
Centering accuracy is associated with the programming function and
concerns the ability of the system to optimally point a target on ground. This is
the difference between a theoretical centre of an image at the programming
step and his real position in the acquired image.
VALUE
Validated
Monitored
Uncertainty
Code
Parameter
Definition
IVOS-11
Direct Geo-location accuracy [m at 1 sigma]
The location error stands for the deviation between the real position of any
point on an image and its estimated position using the ancillary data of
the product without ground control points. The value of this error is
expressed for positions on the reference ellipsoid and an altitude given by a
DTM.
During the last two years, the 90 percentile of average geolocation errors has
varied from 13 to 21 meters projected to nadir.
VALUE
Validated
Monitored
Uncertainty
Code
Parameter
Definition
VALUE
Validated
Monitored
Yes- Monitored through the validation process for those ortho mosaics where
check points are available for every product.
Uncertainty
Code
Parameter
Definition
IVOS-13
Orthorectification procedure
Description of the applied orthorectification procedure specifying the
algorithm, sensor model and used Digital Elevation Model (DEM) or Digital
Terrain Model (DTM).
DigitalGlobe utilizes proprietary algorithms and software during the
generation of orthorectified products. The following describes the general
ortho product generation process.
VALUE
During the product generation process, the DigitalGlobe system uses a single
re-sample process (i.e. input imagery is re-sampled only once during product
generation). The single re-sample process is to ensure that the highest level of
data integrity is maintained. For orthorectified products, all products pass
through a model refinement stage. During the model refinement state, tie
point generation and GCP marking is performed on the raw uncompressed
data. This stage also provides DigitalGlobe with the ability to ensure an
accurate model for every product requiring either a control source or tie
points. Single image orthorectified products ordered with an accuracy
requirement of 1:50,000 for QB or 1:12,000 for WV1 require only a fine
DEM to be applied during orthorectification. Multi image products with the
same accuracy requirement do require tie points be generated to ensure
image-to-image alignment.
During the orthorectification process, DigitalGlobe utilizes the rigorous
sensor model embedded with our proprietary software. In addition to the
rigorous sensor model, DigitalGlobe uses SRTM90 or NED (if available)
DEMs for all ortho processing. These DEMs represent DigitalGlobes default
elevation model for use during orthorectification. Upon completion of the
model refinement stage, all products transition into image correction. At this
point, normal processing resumes.
Validated
Monitored
Uncertainty
Code
Parameter
Definition
IVOS-14
Jitter effect analysis
The jitter effects in an image concerns very high frequencies which occur
during the acquisition and cannot be corrected by calibration (e.g.
microvibrations). Please include within this report and relevant information.
Jitter is < 0.3 pan pixels per integration time
VALUE
Validated
Monitored
Uncertainty
IVOS-15
Noise equivalent reflectance (NE) [no unit] or Noise equivalent
Radiance Difference (NEL) [Wm-2steradian-1m-1]
This can be defined as the minimum change in reflectance (temperature) that
can be detected by the sensor. (Ref: Joseph, G. 2004. How well do we
understand Earth observation electro-optical sensor parameters?. Post-Launch
Calibration of Satellite Sensors. Taylor and Grancis group: London.)
VALUE
Pan
Blue
Green
` Red
NIR(1)
Maximum integration time, zero radiance
Noise Equivalent Radiance Difference
0.14
0.21
0.12
0.13
0.053
Validated
Monitored
Uncertainty
Code
Parameter
Definition
IVOS-16
Saturation radiance setting [mW/cm2/steradian/m]
The maximum value of radiance which can be measured by the detector.
Saturation is the condition where energy flux exceeds the sensitivity range of
a detector.
VALUE
Pan
Blue
Green
Red
NIR1
37.9
42.5
26.2
32.1
24.4
Validated
Monitored
Uncertainty
Code
Parameter
IVOS-17
System signal to noise ratio at two radiance values for the different
bands of the instrument [ratio]
Self explanatory
Definition
VALUE
Validated
Monitored
Uncertainty
Code
Parameter
Definition
VALUE
Validated
Monitored
Uncertainty
210
247
270
268
250
129
166
184
183
172
10
Code
Parameter
Definition
VALUE
IVOS-19
Any additional compression (e.g. jpg), compression noise
Data size reduction due to compression.
The performance of our compression algorithms is scene-specific. We do not
have data from the same imagery for both uncompressed and compressed
imagery so post-launch quantitative measurement is not possible. Pre-launch
simulations showed RMS radiometric errors of 3-10 digital numbers on high
dynamic range scenes. After compression, transmission, and decompression
image quality remains high and has not changed over the mission life.
Validated
Monitored
Uncertainty
Code
Parameter
Definition
IVOS-20
Absolute calibration
VALUE
Validated
Monitored
Uncertainty
11
IVOS-21
Effective bandwidth
Centroid and variance for each band (Ref. Palmer (1984). Effective
Bandwidths for Landsat-4 and Landsat-D Multispactral Scanner and
Thematic Mapper Subsystems. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and
Remote Sensing, Vol. Ge-22, no. 3, pp. 336-33 8.)
Center wavelength (nm)
Mean of 50% response points
Pan
Blue
Green
Red
NIR(1)
VALUE
Validated
Monitored
Uncertainty
725
479
547
654
815
398
68
99
71
114
On ground measurement
No
<2 nm
IVOS-22
Position and Velocity Orbit accuracy [m and m/s]
Horizontal and vertical (radial) orbit position and velocity accuracy.
Post-processed orbit accuracy: 0.9 meter position accuracy, each axis
(radial, along-track, cross-track) 1-sigma uncertainty level.
12
Validated
Monitored
Uncertainty
IVOS-23
Instantaneous field of view (IFOV) [m2]
The instantaneous field of view (IFOV) is the angle over which a
measurement is being made by a detector at any instant (i.e. swath).
Detector IFOV at nadir: see IVOS-03. The swath at nadir is one detector
by 27,568 pan pixels and 6,892 multi pixles, or 61 cm by 16.5 km for pan
and 2.44m by 16.5 km for MS.
By design and telescope distortion measurements
No
Negligible
Code
Parameter
IVOS-24
Instantaneous Access area [m2]
Definition
The total area on the ground that could potentially be seen at any
moment by turning the spacecraft or instrument.
VALUE
QB images are typically taken within 30 deg of nadir, but can be taken
anywhere on the earth as seen from 450km altitude.
Validated
Monitored
Uncertainty
Code
Parameter
IVOS-25
Duty cycle [percentage]
This is the fraction of the total time that the instrument us operating during
an orbit.
<4% duty cycle
Yes
As part of regular operations
Not application
VALUE
Definition
VALUE
Validated
Monitored
Uncertainty
Code
Parameter
Definition
VALUE
Validated
Monitored
Uncertainty
IVOS-26
Temporal resolution with same incidence angle and time of
acquisition [time]
This temporal resolution is defined as the shortest time separation
between two acquisitions of the same location on Earth captured with the
same incidence angle and at the same time of the day.
18 days (277 revs) to ground track repeat within 10 km at equator
247 days (3801 revs) to exact groundtrack repeat
Yes, by normal operations
Yes, by normal operations
Not applicable
DigitalGlobe Confidential and Proprietary
13
Code
Parameter
Definition
VALUE
Validated
Monitored
Uncertainty
IVOS-27
Temporal resolution with different incidence angle and time of
acquisition [time]
This temporal resolution is defined as the shortest time separation
between two acquisitions of the same location on Earth captured with a
different incidence angle and at a different time of the day.
2-3 days depending on latitude
Yes, by normal operations
Yes, by normal operations
Not applicable
Product QA
Sampling
Cloud Cover
Review (CCA)
Quality Issues
Review
14